Chemical thermodynamics of Cs and Te fission product interactions in irradiated LMFBR mixed-oxide fuel pins

Chemical thermodynamics of Cs and Te fission product interactions in irradiated LMFBR mixed-oxide fuel pins

375 Journal of Nuclear Materials 130 (1985) 375-392 North-Holland, Amsterdam CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS FUEL PINS M. G. ADAMSON, PRODUCT INTERACTION...

1MB Sizes 15 Downloads 73 Views

375

Journal of Nuclear Materials 130 (1985) 375-392 North-Holland, Amsterdam

CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS FUEL PINS

M. G. ADAMSON,

PRODUCT

INTERACTIONS

IN IRRADIATED

LMFBR MIXED-OXIDE

E. A. AITKEN

Electric

General

OF Cs AND Te FISSION

Company,

Advanced

Nuclear Technology

Operation,

Sunnyvale,

California

94086,

U.S.A. T. 6. LINDEMER Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Chemical Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, U.S.A.

Technology

Division,

P. 0. Box X,

A combination

of fuel chemistry modelling and equilibrium thermodynamic calculations has been used to predict the atom ratios of Cs and Te fission products (Cs:Te) that find their way into the fuel-cladding interface region of irradiated stainless steel-clad mixed-oxide fast breeder It has been concluded that the ratio of condensed, chemically-associated Cs reactor fuel pins. and Te in the interface region,&?%}, which in turn determines the Te activity, iscontrolled by an equilibrium reaction between Cs Te and the oxide fuel , and that the value of
dynamic

In recent communications, solidus

phase boundaries

liquidus

information

to the interpretation

synergistic

Te,Cs-or

fission

liquid metal embrittlement Type-316

stainless

indicated.2'3 proposed

oxidative

Previously,

as causative

agents

chemical

both incidence

interaction

it is obvious

interpretation.

that

of Cs-Te and

is a prerequisite

0022-3115/85/$03.30

in

for detail-

As noted

0 Eisevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland Physics Publishing Division)

and temperature

relationconse-

employing

to obtain

estimated

the desired

thermodynamic information.

In this paper we present the results of thermochemical

estimations

and

how they have been used to ration-

alize the attainment

of sufficiently

values at the fuel-cladding

low Cs:Te

interface

of ir-

radiated mixed-oxide

fuel pins for promotion

of FPLME

and FCC.1 (Cs:Te<4:1).

(Cs:Te<2:1)

Although

de-

and character

of the thermochemistry

Cs-Te-0 mixtures ed mechanistic

process

have shown that the Cs-to- Te

FPLME and FCC1 processes, knowledge

are

in the conunoner

parameter

functions

indicate

products

thermo-

potential

one must resort to thermochemical

some relevant

out- of-pile

(Cs:Te) is a critical

termining

was

it had been

Since detailed

investigations ratio

calculations

AISI 316 cladding corrosion

known as fuel-cladding

(FCCI).4’8

quently

of

(FPLME) of AISI

steel cladding

derived

ships are lacking for these systems,

of this

product-induced

that Cs and Te fission

implicated

versus composition

for the Cs-Te system

and the relevance

were reported,'

and

experimentally

data such as tellurium

complex

other thermochemical chemical

gen, fuel, reactive ding components

fission

or oxygen chemically

involving

products

between

potential associated

specifically

oxy-

thus

on the

fuel composition

(hi0

of the

and clad-

have been performed,'-"

far none have focussed relationships

analyses

interactions

(0:M)

) and the ratio of

Cs2and Te (a)

in the

376

M.G. Adamson et al. i Cs and Te fission product i~lteract~urls

fuel-cladding pins.

gap of irradiated

Subsequently,"

used to explain

mixed-oxide

these results will be

the Cs:Te-dependences

and FCC1 observed

in laboratory

2. FUEL CHEMISTRY

CONSIDERATIONS

of FPLME

simulations.

fission

products

inside oxide fuel pins is 13,14 well understood, albeit in a

reasonably qualitative words,

sense (see Figure 1).

it is relatively

likely chemical

In this section we examine of current chemical

fuel chemistry

tions of ~reactive/volatile~

semi-quantitative

the capability

models

states and relative

at the fuel-cladding

products

to predict

then, using a model,

pressed

fuel pin of a

for the problem

between

of

Cs:Te and

This relationship

is ex-

in terms of the thermochemical

reaction

equilibria

interface fission

esti-

associated

(Cs:Te). The final step is development

a relationship

at the fuel-cladding

considered

product

most likely to control

reactivity

towards

the clad-

corresponding

more difficult concentrations

to quantify

it the

and distribu-

tions. Our assumed

"chemical

model"

is of neces-

It is based,

sity semi-quantitative.

most part, on the present consensus chemistry chemical

specialists

as to the most likely

states and controlling

equilibria

inside typical

oxide fuel pins. some general

reaction

operating

LMFBR

Our aim here is to arrive at

conclusions

tion ratio of chemically fission products

for the

of fuel

about the concentraassociated

Cs and Te

in, or near, the fuel-cladd-

ing gap.

ding. 2.1 Fuel Chemistry The chemical

phenomena

is considerably

fuel chemistry

fuel composition,

fuel pin, but due to

of kinetic and transport

that also must be taken into consideration,

products

Cs and Te in the gap of an operating

finding

tions in an irradiated

fission

gap loca-

fission

interface,

statement

fuel-cladding

the

concentra-

mate the atom ratio of chemically

thermochemical

states of particular

at discrete

the variety

In other

easy to predict

In addition

Model

behavior

of reactive/mobile

volatile"

to Cs and Te, the "reactive/

fission

FIGURE 1 Chemical Evolution in a Mixed-Oxide Fuel Pin with Emphasis on Fission Product Behavior

products

that must be con-

377

M. G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fission product interactions

sidered

are I, MO, Rb, Br and Se.

Se are members

and, principally

tively

short isotopic

tive yields siderably

erally

classified

as a noble metal-type

certain

characteristics

and relative

"reactive/volatile" typical

fuel immediately

following

reactor

and thermo-

of their respective

in the half-lives

fission

are considered

source of error in the present

6:l.

in fissile

(?lO%) resulting

is relatively

irradiation

constant

Table 1.

sink region

Some fission

inner surface.

gradients

fuel pins, although

the resulting

is not usually

of Cs and Rb is strongly

influenced

Xe and Kr precursors ranging from 4 minutes

ior of gaseous sive isotopic

precursors

.594

.071

fractionation

of Cs fission

6.12

0.73

These

pointed out that as much as one-third i.e., approximately

of 133Cs and 135Cs, transport

Br

Te

Se

MO

.052

.006

.097

.016

.654

0.54

0.06

1

0.16

6.74

Concentration

Concentration

(atom ratio)

to 6

can lead to exten-

Concentrations of Fission Products in Fast Neutrpg Irradiated Uo.8Puo.202 Fuel at 10 at% at burnup I

which

on the behav-

as noted by Langer et a1.16

half the yields

Rb

as marked

The transport

of the total Cs inventory,

cs

product

that exist inside

In fact, this dependence

authors

throughout

layer on the

can also occur down the shallow axi-

products,

fission

includes

fuel (T 5 1lOO'C)

cladding

have half-lives

the first few days

(atom percent) Relative

of the fuel-cladding

product

days.

spec-

condense

as well as the corrosion

by their gaseous

from changes

in some direct

down the steep radial

This non-isothermal

behavior

of once

regions of ir-

and eventually

as radial redistribution.

1 indicate

neutron energy

except during

Absolute

a minor

This ratio, which exhibits

composition,

gradient

or react in the vicinity

irradiated

mixed oxide fuel is

trum and uncertainties yields,

fuel, migrate

axial redistribution

ratio of Cs t Rb to Te t Se

(Cs:Te) in irradiated

small variations

in

Cs:Te

fission products,

radiated

transport

prod-

reduced

in Figure 1, a majority

from the hot central

al temperature

assessment.

The fission yield data in Table

approximately

partners

trans-

decay paths

gap.

some of the cool peripheral

Although

of noble gas precursors

such effects

that the overall

com-

due to differences

the case of the alkali metal ucts),

in the fuel-cladding

released

gap.

as Cs, I

of these chemical

(for example,

and radioactive

As illustrated

due to close sim-

behavior

and Br as I, and Te and Se as Te.

is possible

reactions,

of selective

the "volatile/reactive"

in a

shutdown

pounds, we treat Cs and Rb commonly

some fractionation

combination

temperature

in chemical

stabilities

We now show how the

of the

1.

In subsequent discussion, dynamic

Cs:Te
values

mixed oxide fast reactor

are shown in Table

of both I and Te

can also lead to substantially

category.

products

have had the opportunity

will exceed that of Cs (i.e.,

port mechanisms,

that also

concentrations

fission

irradiated

ilarities

fis-

along with Tc, Rh, Ru and Pd,

place it in the "reactive/volatile" Absolute

fission products

gen-

of ir-

Cs fission

to build up to their steady state concentrations, the total inventories

oxide fuel are con-

MO, although

before the longer-lived

chain decay products

of relatheir effec-

than those of their heavier

Cs, I and Te.

sion product displays

on account half-lives,

in irradiated

smaller

homologues

radiation,

of the lighter mass decay

chains

At the very beginning

in fresh fuel.

Rb, Br and

M. G. Adamson et al. i Cs and Te fission product interactions

378 axially

out of the fuel region as noble gas

rather than alkali metal. The chemical products

in the gap region

or by reactions central

fuel.

ments4*17

are determined

occurring

at this location

in the vapor phase over the Thermodynamic

from out-of-pile

nuclides migrate specie deposits

gradient

experi-

that iodine fission

exclusively

This

inner surface,

inner surface

temperatures

its vapor pressure

is suffici-

ently high that it shows some tendency grate axially

product

as CsI(v).

on the cladding

but even at typical (550 to 75O"C),

data and results

temperature

. indicate

to mi-

toward the blanket/plenum

Te also appears

from hot fuel and migrate

radial/axial

states of Cs and Te fission

either by reactions

escape

to migrate

zones.

down temperature

gradients

temperature

Cs(v) or CsOH(v)."

At locations where

oxide fuel and/or cladding

are not known with certainty

but appear to lie between

1:l and

1000°C and below, co-migrating to become associated concomitant transport

in vapor pressure,

(x=2,3,4),

etc,.provided

ities exceed values.'I

Any remaining

gap as Cs(l), however, high vapor pressure, migrate

stable vapor specie,

however

are only capable fraction

it appears

that the re-

vapor phase or gas-solid of converting

to cooler

transport

vapor specie.

such as the oxygen activity, tion/activity temperature proportion

in condensed

products into 4,18 Factors

the MO concentra-

phases,

are known to influence

both the overall

of converted

MO.

locations.

condenses

and shows no tendency

to take part in chemical

equilibria

fuel or other Cs compounds.

The bulk of the Cs fission

that

either to

in the gap exceeds

In addition

fission

to Cs2Te, which appears

in the cool peripheral

product

intermetallics

constitution

(unless

and the putative detected

intermetallic

fuel oxytellurides

by electron

microprobe

(EMPA) at a variety of fuel

locations

and, based on the observations,

have assumed

state.

Other proposed

such as (Ba,Sr,Cs) (Ba,Sr)Te03

fission

product

(Zr, Mo,RE,U,Pu)03

important

balance

The various

they

in determining

reactions

and transport

proces-

by Cs, Te, MO and I, and their

impacts on both the overall

'chemically-associated'

Cs-to-Te

and

ratios in the

gap (Cs:Te and Cs:Te, respectively) marized

in Table 2.

mates,

the following

assumed:

phases and

of Cs and Te.

involving 4,17 that

as

of Te

chemical

are minor and consequently

ses undergone estimated

we

they fall in the same category

- that is, only a small fraction

Cs2Mo04

9OO'C) or

products

and

such as MOTe or M202Te(M=U,Pu).

Both the small Pd, Te-containing inclusions

fuel or

phases are Pd-rich

of uncertain

oxytellurides

to

fuel and

Te-containing

reaction

are not considered

down axial thermal gradients

the temperature

reduces in the hot-

test gap locations.

the overall

gap

to quickly

This axial

Cs:Te and C-

this

Any Cs2Mo04

in the

due to its relatively

it is expected

of excess Cs effectively

and

finds its way into the fuel-cladding

threshold

Cs condenses

(or Cs) ends up in this particular

a small

of the solid MO fission

their transportable

reactions

the Cs and O2 activ-

the corresponding

are occasionally

(v), forms over the hot fuel

(r1300°C),

oxygen,

their

rates drop considerably.

sponsible

migrate

At

with the fuel and, due to

decreases

A reasonably Cs2Mo04

2:l.

Cs and Te tend

products

or U,Pu), CsxCr04

the gap, other possible

process

corrosion

- _

CS~MO~_~(M=U

concentrate

transport

T

such as Cr203 to form the solid compounds Cs2M04,

associated

vapor

do so as

~110O"C, this Cs can react with the mixed-

accompanied by cesium in oxide fuel 4 environments. The ratios of Cs:Te that are in this high temperature

down the

gradients

In performing

are sumthese esti-

orders of stability

for Cs compounds

(condensed

were

phases)

379

M. G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fission product interactions

z Cs2MO4_y > CsxCrO4

pin power rating.

(x = 3 or 4, y = 0 or 0.44)

to a hypothetical

CsI>Cs2Mo04>Cs2Te

for Te compounds Cs2Te

stabilities

or estimated

fuel surface

ical estimates essarily

approximate

interrelated

r M202Te.

activ-

compounds at typical 11,17 The numer-

conditions.

presented

such as fuel composi-

form, burnup, Table 2.

Variations

tions of processes reduction,

the relative

always

contribu-

la and 9 towards

however,

no matter

Cs:Te

how these vari-

the final Cs:Te value

falls close to 2:l.

tains because oxidation

etc., and fuel

Cs,Te Balance and Transport

(%5 at% burn-

in power rating and fuel compo-

sition can influence

ables are permutated,

in Table 2 are nec-

since they depend on many

parameters

tion, physical

MOTe

refer

nominally-

up).19

are based on cal-

Cs or Te chemical

ities over the various outer

rated FFTF fuel pin at mid-life

phases)

z (Pd-Te-Sn...)>

The relative culated

(condensed

The actual estimates reference-design

in effect

This result ob-

the fuel and Cr203

layer together

provide excess get-

Sheet: Impact of Cs,Te Fission Product Reactions Behavior on Cs-to-Te Ratios in the Fuel-Cladding

Gap

Impact on Cs:Te+ Reaction or Transport Process 1.

Volatile

Fraction of Total Cs or Te Inventory Affected

Overall

Ratio

'Chemically-Associated' Ratio, Cs:Te

precursor

transport

out of fuel

column

2.

CsI formation

a

,X 0.33 (Cs)

Reduced

(3.9:l)

Reduced

(3.9:1)

b

< 0.05 (Te)

Incleased

(4.1:1)

Increased

(4.1:1)

and

0.09

(Cs)

Unchanged

Reduced

(3.6:1)

?r 0.24

(Cs)

Unchanged

Unchanged

(3.6:1)

< 0.10 (Cs)

Unchanged

Reduced

(3.O:l)

~0.10

Increased

Increased

(3.3:1)

transport 3.

CsxTe formation transport

4.

Cs2Mo04

and

(x -1.5)

formation

and

transport 5.

Pd-Te-Sn

Intermetallic

(Te)

formation 6. 7.

MOTe/M202Te Cs2M04_y

formation

formation

< 0.05 (Te)

Unchanged

Increased

(3.5:l)

> 0.20 (Cs;O:M-

Unchanged

Reduced

(s2:l)

Unchanged

Potential

dependent) 8.

CsxCr04

9.

Axial transport

formation

(x = 3)

?

(Cs)

reduction "excess"

Cs*

+Molar Cs-to-Te other chemical

tt

of

?

(Cs; Rating

and O:M-dependent)* ratio in the vicinity forms.

of the fuel-cladding

Value of x taken from results of thermomigration

*"Excess"

Cs only available

if fuel 0:M

q.95.

Potential

Potential

reduction

reduction

(2:l)

(2:l)

gap; Cs:Te does not include Cs in

experiments. 4,17

380

M. G. Adamson et ul. J Cs and Te fission product ~~ter~cti~~s

tering capacity low

for Cs.

In the case of very

0:M fuel (<1.95), this gettering

stable than

capacity

is much reduced, yet, in terms of impact on m

it is at least partially

an increase

compensated

in the axial transport

tellurium by

of "excess"

or "free" Cs. of Problem

The foregoing

semi-quantitative

has shown that mfalls

analysis

with relative

to 2:1, which corresponds

ease

to the composition

of Cs2Te, the only stable compound

on the Cs-

rich side of the Cs-Te phase diagram. l$*O problem

is to show whether

Our

Cs2Te, by

reacting with the oxide fuel (M02ky) or other oxides such as Cr203 or Moo2 to form complex Cs-containing

oxides,

can cause C?

to fall

below 2:l. This problem closely tered in zircaloy-clad where

stress corrosion

that encoun-

to be the zircaloy

cracking

is the chemically

LWR-SCC

parallels

UO2 LWR fuel elements

iodine is assumed

sion products

('XC) agent and CsI

stable form of iodine fis-

in the fuel-cladding

problem

is generally

gap.

assumed

The

to de-

volve on the relative

thermochemical stabil9,21,22 although ities of CsI and Cs2U04,

Gotzmann

has recently

reaction

product

suggested

activity

attainable

face.23

Irrespective

partial

the maximum

at the cladding

the derived

sur-

the I or I2

inside LWR fuel elements,

absolute

activity

small at typical

and operating

iodine

of which thermochemical

is used to estimate

pressures

extremely

that the Cs

Cs2Mo04 may be more important

than Cs21J04 in determining

equilibrium

temperatures

values are

fuel compositions (e.g. pI s 10q5Pa).

Inside LMFBR fuel pins, the corresponding iodine activities

are also small unless

oxygen

or O:M, at the fuel outer

potential,

surface exceeds (that is, 0:M

activity

impractically > 2.01).

Cs2Te is believed

the

high values

However,

because

to be considerably

less

at this location

ted to be significantly iodine.

The question

the lOCal

2.2 Statement

present

CsI at typical LMFBR fuel outer surface operating temperatures, 10,11,24 the

chemical

is expec-

higher than that of now reduces

conditions

to whether

inside an t_MFBR

oxide fuel pin can raise the Te activity

to

the level corresponding

of

Cs2Te.

The previous

and Lindemer question

to decomposition

evaluations

of Gotzmann

et all' did not address

specifically;

however,

this

they did indi-

cate that Cs2Te would become unstable to Cr, Fe and Ni telluride stoichiometric

formation

fuel compositions

3. THERMOCHEMICAL 3.1 Method

thermodynamics

to the fuel-cladding

face region on account

of its strongly

thermal and thermodynamically In practice,

certain

tendencies

assumptions

calculations

'microdomains'.

and a cladding

and performfor two near-

If, as illustrated

as a fuel microdomain

microdomain

gas- or reaction

(B) separated

product-filled

the essential

assumption

transport

(A) by a

gap which SUP-

ports the bulk of the temperature

across

a

in Figure 2, the interface

is considered

component

of

in this region by making

ing thermochemical

region

aniso-

however, we can learn

number of simplifying

schematically

inter-

"open" charac-

about the reaction

species

isothermal

at near-

(O:Ms2).

EVALUATION

In principle, equilibrium

something

relative

and Assumptions

cannot be applied

ter.

10

difference,

is that the rates of

in and out of A and B, and

the gap, are not

excessive

- that is,

they do not result in rapidly changing compositions

of the species under

consideration

in A and B.

Because

the burnup

transport

rates in

and concomitant

component

nominally-rated

fuel pins are slow,

latter assumption consequently confidence

is probably

this

valid;

we can place some degree of in activity

values derived by

381

M.G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fission product interactions

application

to calculate (=RTlnaTe,

adopted

in this evaluation potential

the tellurium

where

reaction

was

activ-

equilibria

calculation

the conventional

activities,

or concentrations

microdomains

A and 6 over a range of typical

temperatures

(800 to 1400K) at selected

fuel

ponding change

employed

is

of deriving

partial

pressures

of both reactants

and prod-

ucts for the process

in

method

2nd Law procedure

the equilibrium

AGTe

aTe is the tellurium

ity) for controlling

thermochemical

thermochemistry.

of equilibrium

The approach

either from the corres-

in the standard

AGT (= RTlnK, where

Gibbs energy,

K is the equilibrium

stant) or from the equilibrium

con-

condition

that

E(G~)- ~(6~) = 0, where E, and $. are the partial molar free energies tials of products ly.25

Of course,

equivalent energies product

poten-

respective-

these two approaches

are

and require as input standard

of formation,

of formation

Gibbs

AG~O,~, for reactant

To express

species.

energies

or chemical

and reactants,

and

these standard

as functions

of tempera-

ture, we employ the linear approximation

aGfO T

,

= AHf0,2g8 - TLIS~~,~~~, where AHf0,2g8 and AS; 2g8 are the respective

,

and standard

entropy

of formation

and T is the temperature expression accurate

compositions

(0:M = 1.99 to 2.001) or their

corresponding potential,

oxygen potentials.

aE

thermodynamic

here as RT lnP* 02' (MPa). For equil-

conclusion

has been reconfirmed treated

source references.

substitutes

eral instances

lack measured

for the

which

in sev-

including

those due to small stoichiometry

differences believed

by this substitution

in the reaction

to be quite small

equations

- are

(slOkJ/mol).

The

from the 298 from the

method. 26

The

data used in the present

The following incurred

study by

- Controlling

Reaction

Equilibria

data. The errors

for several

are listed in Table 3 along with

3.2 Te Activity

thermodynamic

This

in the present

more exact free energy function thermodynamic

the

to phase

with values calculated

pounds as reasonable

(U, Pu) compounds

This

provided

ffiGf" values calculated

calculations

actual mixed

of interest

equilibria

02' P* = Po2 (MPa)/Pi2 02 ibria involving oxide fuel, we used U com-

where

298.15K

of Gibbs energy data

values corresponding

approximation

is defined

at

in the kelvins.

are not neglected. I1

transitions

comparing

Oxygen

enthalpy

was shown to afford an acceptably

representation

at the temperatures FIGURE 2 Schematic of Fuel-Cladding Interface Illustrating Fuel (A) and Cladding (B) Microdomains

standard

-

used throughout

IAEA-recommended the remainder

is

denote

phases:

state;

( ) gaseous state; [ ] solid solution

(subscript

c

notation

of the paper to

denotes

'solid state;

solvent); <

{

!liquid

ldenotes

solid

M.G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fission product interactions

382

Table 3.

Thermodynamic Participating (Enthalpy

Element/Compound

Values at 298.15K for Elements and Compounds in Fuel-Fission Product-Cladding Equilibria

Values in kJ/mol,

'"F.298

{Cs}

Entropy Values

Reference

‘;98

2.092

in J mol -lK-1).

(and Notes) 27

92.07

76.65

175.5

27

d-IO>

0

28.6

27

(02)

0

205.0

27



0

49.71

28

ITe}

17.5

73.91

28 (AH and ASm from samC ref.)

(Cs)

(Tel

211.7

182.6

28

(Te2)

160.4

258.9

28

4s Te>

-284.5

174.4

(Cs:Te)

-240.6

214.7

40 >

2 2

11 11,24 (AH and AS estimatedmby auth!!!r)

-1084.0

77.0

28

-1514.0

248.3

11

-1926.0

219.7

11



-1141.0



-1444.7

3 4

-1542.0

296.2

11

-1587.0

361.9

11


>



81.17

-23.0

80.0

-130.5

200.8

29 29

200.8

-87.9

120.3

-301.3

208.0



25,29 (Estimated by authors from data in Ref. 29)

84.06

-144.8

2

30(270-4)

146.0

-57.3



28

0

29 24,25,29

27.28

25



0

29.87

25



0

23.64

25

123.05

30



-346.6

ICSIl

-321.7

150.7

30 (AH, from Ref. 31)

m-1 I

-151.9

275.19

30

or liquid phase, depending

on the melting


>+
temperature. The controlling the interface

reaction

for Te activity

region was concluded

to be

2-y>

+ yco21

in or, for the corresponding

uranium

system,

(1)

383

M.G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fission product interactions



(2)

+

reactions

+ $P(02) The other candidate for microdomain

reactions

A (lOOO-1400K)

With the exception

written,

represent reaction

(3).

were: (3)

+

bivariant

the boundary

Other reaction

this evaluation

equilibria;

(4) is a univariant

rium that defines

considered

of (4), these various

equilibria

as

equilib-

between

(2) and

considered

in

are:

+ 0.78(02)

> t 0.22cTe) = 0.22~ Cs2Te)

<“2”3.56

t 0.22



+ 0.78

(4)


(II)

{Cs2Te3}

(12)

and

t +

=
2(02) (5)

= {Te)

(13)

2ITe) = (Te2)

(14)

(Te2) = Z(Te)

(15)

[TelCs =
(16)

(12) = 2(I)

(17)

or t 2 2 2 4 + (02). To allow comparison reaction

describing

with reaction(Z),

the equilibrium

(6)

the

between

oxide fuel, cesium and iodine

+ (I,) = 2CCsIl+



(7)

5$%3,) For microdomain

was also evaluated.

= + 2Cr>

1000K) the possible Te activity controlling reactions

considered

were:

< Cs2Cr04> +

and direct less steel,

813

reaction

In reactions

l=

4/3

(8) and (9),

reduction

(19)



= [Felss + 0.9
(20)

>= 3[Ni],, t 2
(21)

Cr203


urium potential reaction

2.

the procedure

by which

data are calculated,

Writing

tell-

consider

for the equilibrium

con-

dition

.

(IO)

6

was also

was

(slOkJ/mol

at

G(Te2) = '
or .

small effect on the

Te or 02 potentials

2deCr 240 > = 2 t (02)

TO illustrate

in stain-

in Cr203 activity

found to have a relatively

lOOOK).

+ 5/6(02)

chromium

as [Cr203]FeCr204,

The resulting

calculated

(9)

[Crlss, and tellurium:

[Crlss +
considered

between

(18)

5/4(02)

+

t 2(02)

B (BOO-


and setting



activities,

we obtain

2+x' + 9

' $02)

and at unit

(22)

384

M. G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fissiort product interactions

AGTe

=

AG;402+x> + AG;
(23)

50

I

I I MIC~DO~AIN

/--

RTlnaCs Te t 2-x L$ 2 2 o2

AGof&2UO4>-AG;{Te}+ or AGTe

=

A(AG",) + RTlnaCs Te t

(24)

2

(0:M

2-x RTlnP

= 2 FOR M

= ~O.?S~UO.25)

a Mo=

02

2 where

I

A f f UEL 1

I

(REACTION

5)

A(AGO~) represents the arithmetically

combined

bGDf terms.

Since x is small (sO.OOl),

~G;id_iO~+~>

=

bGof, and equation 24 simplifies to

AGTe

=

A(AGO~) + RTlnaCs2Te + AGO*.

The equilibrium

Te potential

to depend on the temperature, and activity

of Cs2Te.

data, and assuming level for Cs2Te

some reasonable

of the thermochemical

Figure 3 illustrates calculations

900

activity

performed

of T and

data.

for reactions

corresponding

2, 5 and

and oxygen

to exactly

stoich-

and Adamson,3'

and, in the case of reaction

the activities

of both

Te potential

tion 9 < reaction

5,

plots

the trend

in the order reac-

2 < reaction

case, the effect of employing value

5.

In each

a lower aCs Te 2

is the same - that is, it produces

essentially

parallel

lated Te potentials. of hGTe for reaction ~o:Cs2Mo04

activity

(400

( K1

decreases

in the calcu-

An additional 5 results

lowering

if the assumed

ratio is reduced

to 0.1: ,; however,

the resulting

still do not match

those corresponding

from 1:l

calculations

conclusion

to

cladding

interface

5 is the Te

equilibrium region.

to indicate

conditions

to draw from these

is that reaction

activity-controlling

appears

AgTe values

2 until T > 1400K.

The obvious

and were The Ellingham-type

of aGTe versus T are seen to display of increasing

TEMPERATURE

reaction

data used here were The mixed oxide hG 02 taken from the recent measurements of Woodley

to be equal.

(200

FIGURE 3 Equilibrium Tellurium Potentials (AG ) of Candidate Te Activity-Controlling Re a: &ions 2, 5 and 9 Plotted as Functions of Temperature

the range of

iometric mixed oxide fuel (Uo,75Puo.2502).

assumed

4000

the results of such

9 with Cs2Te at unit activity potentials

AGof

(say 0.1 to l), we may calcu-

values which fall within

val4dity

is thus seen

oxygen potential

With appropriate

late AGTe for a typical matrix

A$

(25)

in the fuel-

Thermodynamics

that under typical gap

Cs2Te decomposes

lower oxygen potentials

to elemental

over cCs2Mo04>

Te at

+

than over + 2 3 4 However, with kineticalfy limited _ reaction

equilibria,

are sometimes earlier,

thermodynamic

misleading

this appears

to be the case with

Since an analogous

reaction

5.

reaction

5 has been proposed

iodine activities

predictions

and, as mentioned

sufficient

equilibrium

to

as the source of to induce XC

in

385

M. G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fission product interactions

zircaloy-clad worthwhile

LWR fuel elements,

to summarize

23

the evidence

+ equilibria

of the fuel may be strictly

trolling

it is

capsule

(a) no tendency

hypothetical:

cladding

the product

of reaction

to form as

between

Cs20 and (b) no tendency

with

for Cs2Mo04

in liquid Cs containing

oxidation

products,

2 give considerably

tials than reaction

to

very

it is migrating

rather than with traces

of Cr203 on the cooler cladding the reactivity

dominantly cladding

as an oxide

as a mobile

surface,

alternative

(Moo2 or Mo03);

temperature

gradient

experiments,

in

Cs+I and Cs+Te mixtures were

allowed

to thermodiffuse

of stoichiometric stoichiometric temperatures

hyper-

oxide fuel pellets

gave no evidence

CsI or Cs2Te had undergone

cific chemical container

interactions

material

specifically

from

as high as 14OO'C inside

long MO capsules, either

over columns

and slightly

that spe-

with the MO

(one such test was

designed

to detect

I2 re-

leased as the result of such inter17,34 action);

unalloyed

liquid;

upon calculating (c-205 kJ/mol)

regime

(~-550

9; he influences

tion 2 were determined

4GTe

that, strictly,

studied,

fied by the small errors

for temperatures

these calculations,

02

was justi-

((lOkJ/mol).

1.9995, 2.0000,

tions; when Cs and MO 'co-habit',

ed by appropriate

in Figure 4.

900

For

2.0005 and 2.0010 were obtaininterpolation

lation of the data described Oxygen potentials

and extrapo-

in reference

plotted

32.

at 900 and 1400K are given

in Table 4; the estimated

uncertainties

these data range from 15 to 25 kJ/mol.

If reaction 5 is excluded as the aTe-con-

The

in the interval

G values corresponding 4 to mixed oxide stoichiometries such as 1.9990,

it is rare to find cs at these loca-

rather than metal-

+

phase equilibrium

incurred at both the

upper and lower 0:M limits

in (outer) unrestruc-

lieved to be oxidic

25 with it is

the
use of this approximation

of irradiated

lic.

poten-

does not apply over the entire O:M/A% range

tured fuel regions

in the gap where the MO is be-

Although

condensed

seen inside cracks

usually

low

value for reac-

from equation

set equal to unit.

to 1400K, are illustrated

it is

extremely

in the applicable

kJ/mol at lOOOK).

MO is occasionally

pins,

repre-

of fuel 0:M or oxygen

tial on the equilibrium

aCs2Te recognized

The

3 and 4 were both rejected

Te potentials A6

in B, the

fuel - Cs2Te equilibria

as candidates

results, although

due to the

Cs2Te is a solid.

sented by reactions

which

inner surface.

of Cs2Te in micro-

fact that in this region it exists pre-

of Cs or Cs20

could only take place

initially

it

region will react with the (hot) fuel through which

domain A (the fuel) is enhanced

tests also showed that a conphase reaction

- is

higher Te poten-

9 but, intuitively,

similar

if MO existed

0

respectively

In addition,

leading to Cs2Mo04

the equilibria

Not only does

straightforward.

low levels of oxygen at T <1000K;4'17y33

densed

reac-

seems more likely that Cs2Te at the interface

MO

metal and liquid Cs supersaturated

decompose

reaction

tests demonstrated

between

Cs2Te and the fuel, and Cs2Te and

between

for Cs2Mo04

represent

tions 2 and 9 - which

that

in outer regions

relatively isothermal

the choice

equilibrium,

of Also

in Figure 4 are AcTe versus tempera-

386

ht. G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fission product interactions

Table 4.

Oxygen

Potential

(AE, ,kJ/mol) - Fuel Composition

(O:M;M=U.75Pu.25)

Da&

from Reference

1.9995

ture relationships telluride

316 stainless

tellurides

metals

-640

-630

-443

-264

-244

-470

-460

-394

-259

-239

considered

metal

Fe, Cr and Ni, The metal

are assumed

to be the

with their respective

at typical cladding

thermochemical

+

of the three common AISI

10, 20 and 21.

phases co-existing

2.0010

900

steel components

i.e. reactions

2.0005

1400

for [metal1316

equilibria

2.0000

32.

temperatures.

The

data used for ,

and

were either taken di29 rectly from Mills' assessment or estimated

using the techniques

discussed

and Mills' data for related example,
NiTe2.

tellurides.

data for NiTelml,

To calculate

telluride

equilibria,

For

values were obtained coefficients components

000

+ metal to

of Fe, Cr

stainless

steel.

by calculating

Such

activity

(vi) for each of the three

4000

!200

TEMPERATURE

(K)

1400

FIGURE 4 Equilibrium Tellurium Potential of Reaction 2 Plotted as a Function-of Temperature and Fuel 0:M (also shown are AG -T relationships for three Metal-Metal TellJfide Equilibria).

in Fe-Cr and Fe-Ni binary alloys

from appropriate Gibbs energies estimated

from

potentials

it was necessary

for the activities

and Ni in AISI Type-316

11

Ni2Te3 and

the tellurium

with the three [metal]316

values

[Crlsc6ss + (CrnTex) ---

for

listed in Table 3 were estimated

associated

utilize

in reference

the AHf",2g8 and S;g8 values

corresponding



tables of partial

of solution35.

activities

5; wherever

experimental reasonable

illustrate

These

are summarized

comparison,

The results

excess

slightly

Table 5.

Estimated Activity Type-316 Stainless

wt%

to very

fuel (AzTe>' 0, or

Cs2Te will be converted

Values for Fe, Cr and Ni in AISI Steel at lOOOK

Concentrations Component

First, Cs2Te

with respect

hyperstoichiometric

aTes l; in reality,

was noted.

in Figure 4

clear trends.

is seen to be unstable

in Table

data were found for agreement

presented

several

Activity

N(mole fraction)

Coefficient (Vi)

Activity (ai = yiNi)

Fe

65.5

0.651

1.1

0.70

Cr

17.0

0.181

2.3

0.42

Ni

12.0

0.113

0.5

0.056

to

381

M. G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fission product interactions

Cs2Te3 or some other higher telluride, potential

then being determined

reaction

equilibrium



+ &*UO47

Te potential,

involving

ICs2Te)

Second,

).

is critically

upon oxygen potential u0.75pu0.2502+y

tellurium

to react with chromium

stainless

steel cladding

Te activity

(activity)

calculated

in Type 316

iodine partial

that the calculated

A(&;)

in go

uncertainty

to *lo0 kJ/mol, which

the estimated

3.3

Relationships

2.

At

on AzTe

arises princip-

associated

value of AGfoCs2Te}

for stoichiometric

02 kJ/mol).

is ver 3 sensi-

and in the cor-

term for rPaction

ally from the uncertainties

is

2 on AGo

Te activity

lOOOK the cumulative

and 2

fuel

of the strong de-

for reaction

with

(?42 kJ/mol)

mixed oxide

Between

(*25

Te Activity,

Cs:Te and Fuel 0:M

ships necessary versus

to construct

Cs:Te at a typical

temperature. exercise between

of developing

was 950K, which the ranges

(6) but is slightly

a plot of AETe gap

chosen for this

lies approximately

for cladding

(A) and fuel

below the normal boiling

point of liquid cesium equilibria

eval-

the relation-

fuel-cladding

The temperature

(95210.

are represented

(26)

20.8TlnXTe

where

XTe is the Te mole fraction.

tion 26 was derived

The pertinent

by reactions

11, 12

s01vus~'~~

of the form AGTe = A t BT t

RTnlnXTe where

n= 2.5; this form of expres-

sion, which corresponds

to a Henrian

model, was used previously Phillips

to describe

of pertinent

pression

describing

Cs:Te<3:2,

portion

Te-rich

the Te-rich - fCs2Te$

As a reasonable

was estimated

measurements

The AG;

somewhat

oxygen

using Knights and Phillips'

on {Cs20) +



+ {Cs021 mixtures. 36

workers

found a0 (=p, /pi

if similar behavior Te-Cs mixtures,

and

At 500°C these

) to lie in the

range of 0.01 to20.022for2mixtures

analogous

line

end of the hypothetical tie and pure{ Tel.

value for ICs2Te31

activity

ex-

liquid solutions,

we simply drew a straight

between

of

Due to a complete

data, an analogous

was not derived.


crudely

solution

by Knights and

an equivalent

solvus. 36

absence

approximation,

and 4GTe

11 at 773, 873 and 973K to

values for reaction an expression

Equa-

by fitting Te solubilities

along the {Cs 1 -

>l:l;

The second part of the thermochemical uation consisted

re-

= -315342 + 131 T +

the ICsI -Cs20>

tive to uncertainties

amounts

For

7 is 12 to 13 orders

consequence

of ~~~~

responding

12).

smaller.

One obvious pendence

to convert

over stoichiometric

from reaction

of magnitude

high for

Cr203 layer; as shown later, the

the corresponding

in liquid cesium

16), the following

was used:

AzTe(J/mol)

in the event there is

to ICs2Te31 (i.e. reaction

pressure

lationship

of tellurium

reaction

over

may also be high enough

comparison,

of formation

dependent

fuel is sufficiently

no protective

of

(Cs:Te>3:1;

range 1.9995 to

Third, the Te potential

stoichiometric

For solutions

+

over the narrow

stoichiometry

and 16, and the Gibbs energies

used are those listed in Table 3.

the equilibrium

and hence the propensity

Cs2Te to decompose,

2.0005.

the Te

by a new

with 0:Cs

is assumed i.e.

for the

= 0.015 It

aTe .005 for Te:Cs = l:l, then using AG+!%s2Te>

and reaction

12, a value for AGO" {Cs2Te3} may

be calculated. No attempt was made to estimate

separate

&If0

and ASSfOvalues for Cs2Te3, due to the lack of data on comparable The resulting

families

S-shaped

imposed over a schematic diagram

in Figure 5.

of compounds.

plot is shown superof the Cs-Te phase

The hG,, versus Cs:Te

M. G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fission product interactions

388

plot actually

parallels

shaped curves relating

the well-known 2

02 oxide fuel and, to provide reference several of the fuel compositions to the fuel-Cs2Te indicated. potentials [metal]

equilibrium

Also indicated corresponding +

metal

on the fuel side.

points,

corresponding

(reaction

1) are

are equilibrium

Te

transport cladding

This is necessary

because

of Cs and Te across the gap to the through

the gas-phase

the Cs and Te partial ratio; these,

pressures

will depend on and their

in turn, may be sensitive

tions of oxygen potential

to the three

telluride

316SS and the corresponding

S-

and 0:M for mixed

Two equilibria

func-

and temperature.

are relevant

here, namely

equilibria

Te activity

levels.


l.%UO2>

+ 1.5(02) -c (Cs)

(27)

= (Te) + 1.5 and Z
+ 2.5

+ 2.5(02) + (Cs)

(28)

= (Te2) + 2.5

Both equilibria 0 EOUIVALENT F”ELO:M I REACTION II

-260

either

in Figure 6. -300 -

4’1 4

2:1 32

I:,

2’3

,,,

12

,I

I:4 Cr.TeRATIO 4

were considered

because

(Te) or (Te2) may be dominant, The oxygen potential

of the

boundary

between

tracting

(28) from (27) to eliminate

then setting

the two was obtained

pTe = pT

Equations

.

as shown

by sub(Cs) and

27 and

28 were also used to c % lculate the oxygen potential

at several pT

/pcs and pTe/pCs

” Figure 6. values, which also are e% s own in Inspection

of Figures 4 and 6 reveals

both the Te potential the corresponding are markedly CS

80

66 46 COMPOSITION. AT%

Te

26

3.4 The Gas-Phase

(Te2):(Cs)

and (Te):(Cs)

Thus far, we have developed between

fuel O:M, the condensed

ratio, and Te potential understand

the situation

and (Te):(Cs)

responding

to various

phase Te:Cs

or activity.

To fully

in the fuel-cladding

gap, we must also consider (Te2):(Cs)

relationships

the ratios of

in the gas phase cor-

condensed

phase ratios

on the fuel 0:M.

How-

ever, it is also clear that for exactly fuel, the gas-phase

composition

will be Cs-rich at all likely temperatures Under these conditions,

(lOOO-1400K). fore, gas-phase

transport

there-

of Te (and Cs)

across the gap could never provide Te in excess of that needed to form
surface.

more positive

Ratios in the Gap

at the fuel surface and

Te:Cs ratio in the gas-phase

dependent

stoichiometric FIGURE 5 Diagram Illustrating the Relationship between the Equilibrium Tellurium Potential in Reaction 2, the Condensed Phase Cs:Te Ratio and the SolidusLiquidus Phase Boundaries of Cs-Te Binary Mixtures.

that

In contrast,

definition

tial for stoichiometric 0:M slightly face,

greater

at the

a slightly

of the oxygen potenU

0 75"O 25'2' Or an than 2 at the fuel sur-

wiZ2 result in Te transport in excess of

that needed to deposit
on the cladd-

not only increases Increase of the A; ing. 02 the Te and Te2 partial pressures - according to the equilibrium

389

M.G. Adamson et at. / Cs and Te fission product iIlter~t~o~s

are measurements

of Cs:Te in irradiated

fuel

pins, the impact of fuel pin linear power rating on
incidence

The evaluation

relative

to

of FCC1 and FPLME.

has shown that the overall

ratio of (condensed)

chemically-associated

and Te that develops

in the gap of irradiated

pins is low relative

to the fission yield

ratio @2:1

versus %:l).

the Te activity equilibrium

It is proposed

between

activity-controlling

condensed surface.

equilibrium

to oxygen potential

stoichiometry

that

in the gap is determined

reaction

and oxide fuel at its outer

sensitive

Cs

This Te

is very

(AE

(0:M).

by an

Cs2Te

02

) or fuel

As shown in figures 4 and 5, stoichiometric I

I

-500 800

o\I,‘i

I

I

$000

fuel establishes

1200

TEMPERATURE

1400

cladding

(Kl

a Te activity

enough to convert

unoxidized

to its telluride

enough to correspond (i.e. Cs:Te
FIGURE 6 The Oxygen Potential - 0:M - Temperature Dependence of the Equilibrium Gas Phase Te-to-C& Ratio in Reaction 2 (calculated from reactions 27 and 28)

tainties

+ + (02)

(29)

= &2UO4>

metric

f (Te),

high

to Cs2Te decomposition

Taking account

of uncer-

data used and

made in the calculations,

noting that slightly

clearly

in the

and is nearly

in the thermochemical

assumptions

is sufficiently
that is high

chromium

and

hyperstoichiometric

oxidizing

fuel

to decompose

it is also possible fuel may be capable

Cs2Te,

that stoichioof reducing

Cs:Te

below 2. for example partial

- but it also decreases

pressure

- according

Calculations

the Cs

corresponding

to the equi-

0:M values

librium

of the gas-phase to various

Cs:Te ratios

fuel outer surface

(or condensed-phase

Cs:Te ratios)

have shown that for typical gas conditions

= Z(Cs) + do*

>+ (02).

(30)

gas-phase

is always more Cs-rich

evaporating

phase transport

4. DISCUSSION In this section

of the paper we discuss

results of our thermochemical Cs,Te fission cladding

product

evaluation

behavior

the

of

in the fuel-

gap in terms of the factors exerting

primary

influences

c-1

ratio at the fuel outer surface

the cladding

condensed

products

and

Also discussed

Thus, if gas-

is the only path for Cs-Te to reach the cladding

face, we would not expect

the cladding

unless the fuel Of course,

face is touching

the gap allow

the gap by capillary

on

corresponds

if the f&l

bridge

to

condensing go

the cladding,

within

sur-

this mechanism

lead to Cs:Te
to 0:H $2.

on the condensed-phase

inner surface.

fission

phase.

the

than the

outer sur-

or if solids

liquid Cs-Te mixtures action,

to

gas-phase

hf. G. Adamson ei al. / Cs and Tc~~si~n product i~lterQcti~ns

390

transport is unnecessary and Cstfe will likely

close to stoichiometric 14'37 and burnup, by

reach the cladding without change in composi-

generating a surplus of metallic fission prod-

.

.

tion, i.e.
ucts that are noble with respect to oxidation,

densed-phase transport is felt to be a more

raises the global 0:M value.14'15 The net

plausible trans-gap transport mechanism in

result is that after 1-2 at% burnup in typical

fuel pins irradiated to burnups 22 at%.

commercial LMFBR fuel pins the peripheral fuel

The factors

that

exert

the major influence

on AGTe, and hence on Q:s:Te),are the fuel oxygen potential and the fuel 0:M. The oxygen

will have attained an oxygen potential corresponding

to near-stoichiometric

fuel.

At this point the Te activity, or cm],

potential of the peripheral fuel, which is in

is SO close to the threshold for Cs2Te de-

turn influenced by fuel temperature, deter-

composition that a relatively small increase

mines the local Te activity, and the fuel 0:M

in fuel oxygen potential will accomplish

value - together with the local Cs and Te con-

Any abrupt increase in fuel operating temper-

centrations - determines
ature, such as accompanies a normal power

this,

or reduction in
ascension or design basis over-power transi-

interaction depends upon the relative quanti-

ent, might be sufficient to raise AE

ties of Cs2Te, fuel and available oxygen within the fuel. Reactions 31 and 32, in which

necessary

the 02

amount.

In this connection

we note that Cs:Te con-

ratios as low as 1:3 have been

Ay(=y-y') represents the 'availableoxygen',

centration

describe the overall stoichiometry:

measured by British workers at the fuelcladding

+

Y

+ + 2-a


y-&': Cs2M04,(31)

cMO~+~,> + +I

interface

region in certain oxide-

fuelled LMFBR-type test pins.6

These measure-

ments included pins reported as suffering exceptionally severe FCC1 at relatively low

Tel

cladding temperatures (380-540°C)and Material
2

unreacted”

+ Ay {Tel =

(32)

&s2TeI+Ay”l.

Test Reactor pins that exhibited

'normal'

FCCI; in both cases the Cs:Te determinations were made at locations where interactionwas

If vaporization of <"Cs2TeI+by'3 is signifi-

most pronounced. Because the measured Cs:Te

cant, as in the case of a true gap, this pro-

ratio is so low, we suspect that the reported

cess will lead to a net decrease in
low temperature "exceptionallysevere FCCI" is

(<2/1+&y). In this case, the relative rates

at least partially the result of Cs,Te-induced

of
liquid metal embrittlement (FPLME).

product supply to the peripheral fuel will

In considering the relationshipsbetween

determine the net concentrationsof Cs and Te


at this location.

of Cs and Te at the fuel-cladding interface,

During irradiation, LMFBR oxide-fuelled pins undergo two processes that tend to simultane-

several interesting questions relating to Te detectability surfaced. Fee and Johnson"

ously raise the 0:M and ~i?~ of peripheral

have argued that because Te is not always de-

fuel to values close to thoge which would de-

tected by EMPA at locations exhibiting FCC1

stabilize Cs2Te. In initially hypostoichio-

the presence of Te is not a necessary condi-

metric fuels, radial oxygen redistribution rapidly brings the peripheral fuel composition

tion for occurrence of FCCI. This argument ignores two important points: first, the in-

M.G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fission product interactions

herent

limitation

of EMPA in detecting

ments at low concentration and second,

sections,3g

in irradiated

the roles of Te-Cs mixtures

fuel that

in promoting

FCC1 and FPLME are essentially

REFERENCES

ele-

the possibility

catalytic.

action,

to promote

the corresponding

typical during

shielded

EMPA system,

preliminary

searches.

is universally

observed

may simply reflect fission yield

inter-

Te level probably

often falls below its detection

threshold

in a

particularly The fact the "Cs ,438 regions

in attacked

the high overa

ratio (essentially

1. Y. G. Adamson and J. E. Leighty, J. Nucl. Yater. 114

both 398

In other words, since only trace levels of Te and Cs may be sufficient

As will be proposed exceeding

paper,12

3. M. G. Adamson, W. H. Reineking, T. Lauritzen and S. Vaidyanathan, Liquid Yetal Embrittlement of AISI 316 Stainless Steel by Te-Cs Mixtures, in: Liquid and Solid Metal-Induced Embrittlement of Metals, ed. M. H. Kamdar, TMS-AIME, New York (1984). 4.

E. A. Aitken, S. K. Evans and B. F. Rubin, Proc. Panel on Behavior and Chemical State of Irradiated Ceramic Fuels, (IAEA, Vienna, 1974) 269; see also, E. A. Aitken, M. G. Adamson, D. Dutina and S. K. Evans, Proc. Symp. on Thermodynamics of Nuclear Materials 1974 Vol I (IAEA, Vienna, 1975) 187.

5.

J. E. Antill, K. A. Peakall and E. F. Smart, J. Nucl. Mater. 56 (1975) 47; also, J. E. Anti11 and x B. Warburton, ibid -71 (1977) 134.

Cs:Te all chemical

threshold chemical ceeding

at the interface criterion

In conclusion, fuel-cladding

promotion

limit. the present

interface

evaluation

Cs-to-Te

region of irradiated

of FCC1 (Cs:Te<4:1)

tain conditions,

has

ratio at the

fuel pins is sufficiently

and,

low for

under cer-

FPLME (Cs:Te<2:1).

case of FPLME, the essential condition

than ex-

and system-dependent

shown that the effective

mixed-oxide

Te activity

is a more plausible

for interaction

some arbitrary

EMPA detectability

in a subsequent

some critical

In the

thermochemical

to be met at the interface

corresponds

stoichiometric

hyperstoichio-

metric

fuel.

It

tion is achieved sions,

is suggested during

LMFBR power

or a design basis over-power

trans-

ient. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS gratefully

by the U.S. Department Reactor

Research

Sciences,

of Energy,

Technology

under Contracts

and W-7405-eng-26,

acknowledge

support

Divisions

and Materials

DE-AT03-76SF71031

respectively.

of

J. Nucl. Mater. e

Nucl.

(1979) 39.

11. T. B. Lindemer, T. M. Besmann and C. E. Johnson, J. Nucl. Mater. -100 (1981) 178. 12. M. G. Adamson published.

The authors

ibid, p. 108 (a) and p.

9. T. M. Besmann and T. B. Lindemer, Technol. -40 (1978) 297. 10. 0. Gotzmann,

power ascen-

such as a normal commercial

increase

M. G. Adamson,

to

that this condi-

reactor

7. A. Delbrassine and A. J. Flipot, Fuel and Cladding Interaction, Intern. Working Group on Fast Reactors, Tokyo, 1977,‘ IAEA/IWGFR-16 (1977) 9.

170 (b).

to be that the oxygen potential or very slightly

6. K. Q. Bagley, W. Batey, J. R. Findlay and R. Paris, in: Proc. Intern. Conf. on Fast Breeder Reactor Fuel Performance, Monterey, CA., 1979, (ANS, 111., 1979) 233.

8.

appears

(1983) 327.

2. Y. 6. Adamson, E. A. Aitken and S. Vaidyanathan, Nature -295 (1982) 49.

forms of Cs find their way into the gap; see Table 2).

391

and E. A. Aitken,

13. E. A. Aitken, General NED0-12328 (1972).

Electric

to be

Report

14. R. L. Gibby, R. E. Woodley, M. G. Adamson and C. E. Johnson, in: Proc. Intern. Conf. 3n Fast Breeder Reactor Fuel Performance, Yonterey, CA. 1979, (ANS, Ill., 1979) 188.

M.G. Adamson et al. / Cs and Te fission product interactions

392

15. J. H. Davies and F. T. Ewart, J. Nucl. Mater. 41 (1971) 143.

26. T. B. Lindemer, (1976) 75.

16. S. Langer, G. Buzzelli, J. R. Lindgren, P. W. Flynn, R. J. Campana, L. A. Neimark, S. Greenburg and C. E. Johnson, in: Proc. Intern. Conf. on Fast Breeder Reactor Fuel Performance, Monterey, CA., 1979, (ANS, Ill., 1979) 353.

27. JANAF Thermochemical Tables, NSDR-NBS-37 (1971) and Supplements (1974, 1975, 1978).

17. M. G. Adamson, J. H. Davies and E. S. Darlin, Internal Fuel Rod Chemistry, Intern. Working Group on Fuel Performance and Technology for Water Reactors, Erlangen, FRG, 1979, IAEA/IWGFPT-3 (1979), 83: see also Trans. Amer. Nucl. Sot. -17 (1973) 195. 18. I. Johnson and C. E. Johnson, Proc. Symp. on Thermodvnamics of Nuclear Materials 1979 Vol. (IAEA, Vienna, 1975) 99.

i

19. M. G. Adamson and S. Vaidyanathan, Trans. Amer. Nucl. Sot. 38 (1981) 289 and 291. 20. K. A. Chuntonov, A. N. Kuznetsov, V. M. Fedorov, and S. P. Yatsenko, Inorganic Materials (Eng. Trans.) 18 (1982) 937. 21. J. H. Davies, F. T. Frydenbo and M. G. Adamson, J. Nucl. Mater. 80 (1979) 366. 22. 0. Cubicciotti, R. L. Jones and B. C. Syrett, in: Proc. Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry, ASTM 5th Intern. Conf., Boston, 1980 (ASTM, Philadelphia, PA., 1982) 146. 23. 0. Gotzmann, 185.

J. Nucl. Mater. -107 (1982)

24. M. G. Adamson, E. A. Aitken, R. W. Caputi, P. E. Potter and M. A. Mignanelli, Proc. Symp. on Thermodynamics of Nuclear Materials 1979 Vol 1 (IAEA, Vienna, 1980) 503. 25. 0, Kubaschewski and C. B. Alcock, Metallurgical Thermochemistry (Pergamon, Oxford, 1979).

28.

J. Amer. Ceram. Sot. 59

U. S. Department of Interior Bureau of

Mines - Bulletin 672, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC (1982). 29. K. C. Mills, Thermodynamic Data for Inorganic Sulfides, Selenides and Tellurides (Butterworths, London, 1974). 30. D. 0. Wagman and co-workers, Selected Values of Chemical Thermodynamic Properties, U.S. Nat'l. Bur. Stand. Tech. Report Series 270. 31. R. C. Feber, Los Alamos Sci. Laboratory, Los Alamos Report LA-NUREG-6635 (1977). 32. R. E. Woodley and M. G. Adamson, Mater. 82 (1979) 65.

J. Nucl.

33. E. A. Aitken and M. G. Adamson, General Electric Report GEAP-12511 (1974). 34. E. A. Aitken, M. G. Adamson and S. K. Evans, General Electric Report GEAP-12489 (1974). 35. R. Hultgren and co-workers, Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties the Elements (ASM, OH., 1973). 36. C. F. Knights and B. A. Phillips, Mater. 84 (1979) 196. 37. F. Ewart, K. Lassmann, Manes and A. Saunders, (1984) 44.

J. Nucl.

Hj. Matzke, L. J. Nucl. Mater.

38. 0. C. Fee and C. E. Johnson, Mater. 96 (1981) 80.

of

124

J. Nucl.

39. See, for example, H. S. Rosenbaum. T. A. Lauritzen, W..V; Cummings and R. T. Peterson. General Electric Report GEAP-5344 (1967).