Thermochimica Acta, 85 (1985) 315-318 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam
COAL-CHAR
E.
GASIFICATION
PILARCZYK,
K.
WITH
STEAM
KNOBLAUCH
Bergbau-Forschung
GmbH,
315 -Printed
and
in The Netherlands
AND
H.
STEAM-OXYGEN
MIXTURES
JDNTGEN
Franz-Fischer-Weg
61,
4300
Essen
13
(FRG)
ABSTRACT The kinetics and pore development in steam and steam/oxygen gasification of a special coal-char derived from a German bituminous hard coal have been studied in a temperature range of 1023-1213 K. The steam gasification occurs under kinetic control causing the pore volume to grow with increasing burn-off. The reaction order with respect to the remaining carbon is Z/3, the activation energies applying a Langmuir-Hinshelwood equation are 266 resp. 51 kJ/ to steam the reaction rate is enmol. Adding 0.5 i 5.0 % oxygen hanced and becomes limited by the film diffusion-resistance. In this case lower pore volumes are obtained than in absence of oxygen.
INTRODUCTION In
activation
often for
used high
moved
in
of order
the
reaction
regime,
In
external
loss
of
the mainly
tics
study
and
the
pore
steam
a suitable During exterior
kinetic,
kinetic
porous
inner
gasification surface
pore
control
gasification structure
carbon
depending
diffusion
is
and
desired
in
is
is
on
film
order
re-
the
diffusion to
avoid
carbon.
materials
impurities, to
and/or
(ref.l-4)
applications
was
develop
namely
general
papers
materials
capacities.
interior
control.
starting
to
adsorptive
at
Many
carbonaceous
concerning have
been
steam
steam/carrier-mixture oxygen.
of
development
in
low
in
this
often
Therefore,
influence
activation
published
the
amounts
steam
of
different
field.
In
contains
technical
different
objective
of
this
of
on
the
oxygen
work kine-
activation.
EXPERIMENTAL The German
char
used
in
bituminous
(C:
88.0%,
The
kinetics
0040~6031/85/$03.30
H:
0.9%, were
this
hard N:
study
coal
was
by
1.5%,
determined 0 Elsevier Science
derived
from
devolatilization
0:
1.5%,
by
TGA-technique
Publishers
S:
B.V.
0.7%,
a special in ash:
N,
at
6.6%,
measuring
oxidized 1173
K
wf). continous
316 weight
changes
3 mm)
pressure. and
oxygen
different
isothermal
Helium
was
(O-50
different and
of
during
chosen
hPa).
burn-offs
steam/oxygen
grains
of
the
gasification as
carrier
Besides
were
in
these
prepared
gasification
for
(aO.1,
0.3
steam
(100-500
structure
3 mm
- 0.5,
at
TGA-experiments
for
of
char
a thermobalance
chars
analysis
granules
normal hPa)
in
with by
steam
a fluidized
bed. Hg-penetration to
determine
gasified
and
the
adsorption
pore
size
of
methanol
distribution
(T=293
resp.
K)
pore
were
volume
used of
the
chars.
RESULTS
AND
First action
DISCUSSION
of
all
rates
means
the
the
rate
be
oxygen-free
obtained
reaction
glecting can
for
were
is
steam
for
under
the
gasification
three
kinetic
different
control.
influence
of
the
gaseous
formulated
by
the
following
In
products
similar
re-
grains,
that
this the
case
and
ne-
gasification
Langmuir-Hinshelwood
equation:
-
dm, 1 _--.-_=_
dXc
dt
rn!
ki
1
1
dt
(l-Xc)n
= kio
exp
(-Ei/RT)
m,
the
actual
(1)
klCH,O
(m;)"-'
I+k2CH,0
with
Where weight
is
of
respect
carbon,
to
frequency
Xc
carbon,
(2) weight
the
CH
o the
EiZthe
factors,
of
carbon
burn-off,
at
n the
steam
time
t,
reaction
concentration,
activation
energies
rn: the order
initial
with
Iki o the and
T'the
tempera-
ture. The sus
reaction
(l-Xc)
different slope tion
of
on
order
n can
log-log
paper.
steam 0.66
energies
Ei
gression
after
measured
burn-off/
neously.
The
ted
parameters
and
the
result are:
is
Fig.1
time-data of
this
of
For
method different
fitting
plotting
such
parallel
factors
squares
by
shows of
obtained.
frequency
least
obtained
A set
pressures. (n=0.66)
be
is
plots lines
evaluation ki
dXc/
dt
for
four
with of
o a nonlinear
WAS
computed
experiments shown
in
Fig.2.
an the
ver-
average activa-
refitting
the
simultaThe
evalua-
317
kl,O
k2,0
= 4.7.10'
m3gl'3/mo1
= 82.4
m3/mol
min
E1
= 265.6
E:! =
50.9
kJ/mol kJ/mol
* 0.6 8 0 0. 4 k 2
0.00
Fig.1
I
I111114
l-Xc
C-l
I
, 1
1.
Determination tion order n +200,x300,050~
Adding
0.5-5%
O2
gasification very
much
other pore
(see it
the
external is
sion
steam
is
be
On
the by
burn-off due
to
that of
car-
film
diffu
control.
During used
a bimodal
with
micro-
developed.
resp.
100
150
200
Cminl
Influence of temperature on the rate of steam oasification (500 hPa H,OTexp: +1083,x1133,*1183,o1213 K; solid lines: talc.)
1.0
z
0.8
2
0.6
rc 7 0.4 E 2 0.2
gasification
(rp (10
Fig.2
the
shown
analysis
raised
50
enhanced
Fig.3). can
structure
bon
to
0
time t
of the reac(T=1173K/*lOO. hPa H26)
rate
hand
0.2
of
pore
and
the
char
0. 0
structure
time t
macropores
rp>
10
Cminl
rim) is Fig.3
Influence of 0, on the rate of steam gasification (100 hPa H,O,T=1173 K/*0, +5,x10,025,#50 hPa 0,)
318
Fig.4
and
Fig.5
burn-off
for
cation
no
there
the
different
pore
is
show
pore
of
of
experimental
development
a raise
volume
the
is pore
these
conditions.
observed volume
at
T
In
1023
K,
as
function
H20/02-gasifiwhereas
I
,
4o
‘;; > 20
L”
8.0
9 macro
s
At
';; > 20
J “?I a-0
Xc
not
occur,
the
outside
interior. interior
temperature only
oxygen
surface At
the
surface
burn-off.
steam
will
diminish
(see
Fig.5),
with
without
pore in
it volume
the
water-gas
carbon
the is
for
Xc
the
creating
reacts
pore
evident
micropore
I
I
I
C-l
reaction
burning or
steam
consequently
the
I
I
that
a given
pellets pores
too,
volume
does
but
at in
at
increases adding
burn-off
oxygen level
region.
REFERENCES
1 2 3 4
I
Influence of 0, on the development of microand macropore volume in steam gasification (T=1173K/ *lOO hPa Hz0 no oxygen, +lOO hPa HZO+10 hPa 0,)
widening
temperature,
Therefore
especially
Fig.5
endothermic
reacts
area,
increasing
I
I
burn-off
the
area
higher
I
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1. 0
C-l
Influence of temperature on the development of microand macropore volume in H,O/O,-gasification (100 hPa H,O, 10 hPa O,/ + 1023, *1173K)
lower
?z?
B,
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
the
#
pl
,
K
I
macro /
40
burn-off Fig.4
1173
/”
8
5
at
I
60
al
of
(Fig.4).
80
% 8
pores
K. Hashimoto, K. Miura et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 18, 1 (1979) 72-80. H. Juntgen, Carbon, 6 (1968) 297-308. H.E. Klei, J. Sahagian and D.W. Sundstrom, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 14, 4 (1975) 470-473. 5.3. Kipling, and 6. MC Enaney, Papers 2nd Conf. on Ind. Carbon and Graphite, London, 7.-9.4.65, 380-389.
the the with to