Efficient optimization-based design of energy-integrated azeotropic distillation processes
Journal Pre-proof
Efficient optimization-based design of energy-integrated azeotropic distillation processes Thomas Waltermann, Tamara Grueters, Daniel Muenchrath, Mirko Skiborowski PII: DOI: Reference:
S0098-1354(19)30851-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106676 CACE 106676
To appear in:
Computers and Chemical Engineering
Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
13 August 2019 3 December 2019 5 December 2019
Please cite this article as: Thomas Waltermann, Tamara Grueters, Daniel Muenchrath, Mirko Skiborowski, Efficient optimization-based design of energy-integrated azeotropic distillation processes, Computers and Chemical Engineering (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106676
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Highlights • Optimization-based design of extractive and heteroazeotropic distillation processes. • Automatic initialization and polylithic modeling and solution approach. • Evaluation of heat integration, vapor recompression and dividing wall columns. • Integration of solvent selection and energy integration. • Efficient comparison of competing process options in three complex case studies.
1
2
Efficient optimization-based design of energy-integrated azeotropic distillation processes Thomas Waltermann, Tamara Grueters, Daniel Muenchrath, Mirko Skiborowski∗ TU Dortmund University, Department of Biochemical and Chemical Engineering, Laboratory of Fluid Separations, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
Abstract The separation of azeotropic mixtures is frequently performed by extractive or heteroazeotropic distillation processes. The design of these processes requires careful selection of a suitable solvent and is specifically challenging since feasibility and optimality of the processes require consideration of the closed loop design including solvent recovery. Consideration of energy integration further complicates the design task and is usually conducted as post-evaluation step. The current publication proposes an efficient optimization-based design approach, which allows for the direct evaluation of several energy-integrated process concepts, while significantly reducing manual effort and computational time through a polylithic modeling and solution approach. The developed approach allows for a simultaneous evaluation of solvent selection and energy integration and is illustrated for different case studies, including the evaluation extractive and heteroazeotropic distillation for the dehydration of ethanol, as well as the evaluation of multiple solvent ∗
Corresponding author Email address:
[email protected] (Mirko Skiborowski)
Preprint submitted to Computers & Chemical Engineering
December 5, 2019
candidates for the extractive distillation of acetone and methanol. Keywords: Extractive distillation, heteroazeotropic distillation, optimization, energy integration, solvent selection, conceptual design
1
1. Introduction
2
Azeotropic mixtures are encountered in the downstream processing of many
3
chemical processes and are of particular importance for the processing of bio-
4
renewables, for which aqueous-organic mixtures are frequently encountered.
5
Two established process concepts for the separation of such mixtures into
6
high purity products are extractive distillation (ED) and heteroazeotropic, or
7
heterogeneous azeotropic distillation (HAD) (Skiborowski et al., 2013; Arlt,
8
2014; Gerbaud and Rodriguez-Donis, 2014), which have been used in the
9
process industries for almost a century (Stichlmair and Herguijuela, 1992).
10
Both processes depend on the effect an entrainer, or mass separating agent
11
(MSA), has on the thermodynamic properties of the mixture. In the case
12
of ED the MSA facilitates the separation by interacting with the original
13
azeotropic mixture, by altering the relative volatility between the azeotrope
14
forming components, such that they can be separated in a two-feed column,
15
while recovering the MSA in a subsequent recovery column (cf. Figure 1
16
(left)) (Kossack et al., 2008). For HAD, the MSA is supposed to introduce
17
a minimum boiling heteroazeotrope, which facilitates the separation due to
18
a combination of distillation and decantation, as illustrated for a classical
19
configuration in Figure 1 (right)(Kraemer et al., 2011). Due to this combi-
20
nation and the ease of recovery of the MSA HAD was oftentimes preferred
21
in industry (Widagdo and Seider, 1996). Specifically for medium and large-
4
22
scale processes, as in the production of bulk chemicals and intermediates, ED
23
and HAD both benefit from economics of scale (Kiss and Suszwalak, 2012),
24
which they offer over alternative processes for the separation of azeotropic
25
mixtures, such as membrane separations and adsorption. However, since
26
distillation processes suffer from a low thermodynamic efficiency in general
27
(Koeijer and Kjelstrup, 2000) and due to the necessary separation and recov-
28
ery of the additional entrainer, ED and HAD are considered rather energy
29
intensive.
30
In order to design the most effective ED and HAD processes, the choice of
31
MSA, is of tremendeous importance (Blahuˇsiak et al., 2018). Potential MSA
32
are either selected based on heuristic rules and expert knowledge, or through
33
computer aided molecular design approaches (CAMD) (Gani et al., 2006).
34
The latter allow for an automated screening of MSA based on certain fea-
35
sibility criteria and the estimation of thermodynamic properties based on
36
group contribution models or quantitative structure-property relationships
37
(QSPR). CAMD approaches are well established for ED, evaluating e.g. dis-
38
tribution coefficients, selectivities and capacities (Kossack et al., 2008; Zhou
39
et al., 2019), or more informative, information on the isovolatility curve (Cig-
40
nitti et al., 2019). Further analysis of MSA feasibility for both ED and HAD
41
can be derived from analysis of residue curve maps (RCM) (Julka et al., 2009;
42
Skiborowski and G´orak, 2016). As the feasibility of HAD processes requires
43
a rather complex topology with respect to the vapor-liquid-liquid equilib-
44
rium (VLLE), the literature on CAMD approaches for HAD is rather scarce.
45
Two exceptions are the articles of Yang et al. (2012) and Furzer (1994).
46
Both propose a group-contribution-based CAMD approach. However, Yang
5
47
et al. (2012) evaluate the suitability of a MSA based on the formation of a
48
heteroazeotrope, as well as the derived information on its composition, tem-
49
perature and heat of vaporization,while Furzer (1994) proposes a simplified
50
graphical evaluation of the purification of one desired product based on an
51
analysis of the binary x-y diagram.
52
Despite the lack of topology-based screening methods for MSA selection, it
53
is important to recognize that the evaluation generally considers a specific
54
process structure, for which according criteria for MSA selection are derived.
55
While different ED and HAD process configurations are potentially feasible,
56
we will focus in this article on the classical ED and HAD processes illustrated in Fig. 1.
Figure 1: Illustration of the considered extractive distillation (left) and heteroazeotropic distillation (right) process configurations. 57 58
The depicted ED process is feasible for the separation of a mixture with a
59
temperature minimum azeotrope by introducing a heavy boiling MSA, which
60
shows a considerably higher affinity to component A than B. This configura-
61
tion is commonly preferred, because of an easier recovery of the MSA and the 6
62
purification of both products as distillate (Kossack et al., 2008). The recent
63
review article of Gerbaud et al. (2019) provides an elaborate description of
64
this, as well as alternative ED configurations and related feasibility criteria.
65
The depicted HAD process represents the most commonly considered config-
66
uration, which is also representative for the separation of a mixture with a
67
temperature minimum azeotrope, such as encountered in the dehydration of
68
ethanol or isopropanol. While a feasible MSA for ED should not introduce
69
an additional azeotrope, the occurrence of a ternary heterogeneous temper-
70
ature minimum azeotrope is mandatory for a feasible MSA in case of the
71
HAD process. The products are obtained as bottoms products in case of
72
the HAD process, while both columns operate in different distillation regions
73
and process feasibility depends primarily on the liquid phase separation in
74
the decanter on top of the second distillation column. Aside from the specific
75
HAD configuration depicted in Fig. 1, other variants are also possible such
76
as extractive HAD processes (Gerbaud et al., 2019), these are not covered in
77
the current design approach yet.
78
Which process and especially which combination of process and MSA per-
79
forms best requires a thorough investigation of the process performance,
80
based on appropriate thermodynamic and process specific models. The final
81
design tasks consists of the identification of a detailed feasible and at best eco-
82
nomically optimal process design, including various degrees of freedom such
83
as the number of trays or packing height in the different column sections,
84
the entrainer to feed ratio, reboiler and condenser duties and appropriately
85
sized columns. However, first potential MSA candidates need to be identified
86
and evaluated for feasibility. The various approaches for ED reach from an
7
87
investigation of the minimum entrainer flow rate and corresponding mini-
88
mum and maximum reflux ratios by means of RCM analysis (Wahnschafft
89
and Westerberg, 1993), bifurcation analysis (Knapp and Doherty, 1994) and
90
pinch-based shortcut methods (Br¨ uggemann and Marquardt, 2004) to var-
91
ious types of simulation and optimization approaches for equilibrium stage
92
models. For HAD the situation is similar, yet the determination of the mini-
93
mum entrainer flowrate and reflux ratio requires a multi-step approach, even
94
for sophisticated pinch-based shortcut methods (Urdaneta et al., 2002; Wa-
95
sylkiewicz et al., 2003; Kraemer et al., 2011; Skiborowski et al., 2018). Most
96
process design methods based on equilibrium stage models build on a pro-
97
cess simulator in combination with a manual optimization procedure (Brito
98
et al., 2016b), a metaheuristic (Tututi-Avila et al., 2014) or the optimiza-
99
tion of surrogate model, fitted to sampling data obtained from a process
100
simulator (Wang et al., 2013). For any of these design methods, the correct
101
identification of multiple liquid phases in case of HAD is mandatory. For the
102
common case of potential demixing into two liquid phases, this requires the
103
consideration of either vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) or VLLE in respect
104
to the equilibrium description. The article of Gerbaud et al. (2019) provides
105
an extensive review about ED in general and process synthesis, design and
106
optimization in specific, while the articles of Skiborowski et al. (2013, 2015a)
107
provide detailed reviews for ED and HAD in specific.
108
Overall, Scopus lists more than 1000 publications and more than 9000 patents
109
for the keywords ”extractive distillation” and ”heteroazeotropic distillation”,
110
with increasing numbers especially in the recent 10 to 20 years. Yet, only
111
a small fraction of these documents deals with heteroazeotropic distillation
8
112
and even for extractive distillation, articles that consider means for energy
113
integration have been published primarily in the recent five years. Heat in-
114
tegration (Cui et al., 2018), thermal coupling (Brito et al., 2016b) and the
115
equipment integration in terms of dividing wall columns (Kiss and Suszwalak,
116
2012; Franke, 2017), as well as the use of heat pumps (You et al., 2016) or
117
multi-effect distillation (Bessa et al., 2012) are potential options for energy
118
integration of extractive and heteroazeotropic distillation processes. For ex-
119
tractive distillation, the elaborate up-to-date review article of Gerbaud et al.
120
(2019) does not only extensively discuss the assessment of feasibility, syn-
121
thesis and design of extractive distillation processes, but also summarizes
122
the different publications on energy-integrated process designs. Most of the
123
published articles focus on the evaluation of a specific concept for energy
124
integration with respect to the non-integrated base case, considering a single
125
separation problem. Yet, even for those restricted investigations, it is high-
126
lighted that a reliable quantification of energy and economic saving potentials
127
require a case-specific evaluation, for the specific chemical system, feed and
128
product specifications and economic parameters (Brito et al., 2016a). The
129
article of You et al. (2016), which compares different heat pump configu-
130
rations for extractive distillation, as well as the article of Gu et al. (2019),
131
which presents an evaluation of three energy-integrated concepts, considering
132
heat integration, an intermediate reboiler, as well as vapor recompression, are
133
rather rare exceptions.
134
Fig. 2 summarizes the different steps associated with the design of ED and
135
HAD processes, which as previously discussed are mostly investigated subse-
136
quently, as in the classical hierarchical design approach proposed by Douglas
9
137
(1985). However, few efforts have been made to systematically integrate
138
some of the steps, especially the generation of suitable entrainers for ED
139
and the evaluation of the energy-based or economic performance of these
140
MSA candidates. The systematic synthesis framework proposed by Kossack
141
et al. (2008) integrates group-contribution-based CAMD with shortcut and
142
equilibrium-stage model-based process design optimization, while the system-
143
atic framework of Zhou et al. (2019) combines multi-objective optimization
144
for CAMD with RCM analysis and manual optimization of a process simulator model.
Figure 2: Sequence of steps associated with the design of ED and HAD processes. 145
146
For both studies, the rigorous design optimization is limited to a small num-
147
ber of MSA, for which a comparison is made based on the total annualized
148
costs (TAC). This is important for a fair comparison of the different MSA
149
candidates (Gerbaud et al., 2019). Nevertheless, neither of the approaches
150
includes any means for energy integration. However, the consideration of
151
energy integration might considerably alter the ranking of potential MSA,
152
since the MSA choice directly affects condenser and reboiler temperatures
153
and consequently the potential for energy savings. This potential problem
154
was already pointed out by Kossack et al. (2008). Consequently, a holistic
155
design approach should cover all four steps depicted in Fig. 2.
156
While CAMD methods for solvent screening and the preselection based on
157
feasibility criteria have been successfully established, at least for ED, the most 10
158
challenging task for the evaluation of ED and HAD considering means for
159
energy integration is posed by the efforts for the process design optimization.
160
Simulation-based methods for process optimization require at least a feasible
161
and converged initial flowsheet simulation, which has to be derived through a
162
manual trial and error approach. As highlighted by Luyben (2013) as well as
163
Le et al. (2015), obtaining such a convergent base case can be extremely chal-
164
lenging, particularly for HAD processes, for which the correct identification
165
of phase stability and the inherent integration of the column and decanter
166
are serious complexities. In order to avoid the complexity of closed-loop flow-
167
sheets, even for ED, most studies simplify the design task by performing a se-
168
quential design of the extractive and recovery column (Gerbaud et al., 2019).
169
Optimization-based design methods, which attempt an automatic initializa-
170
tion by solving a series of successive optimization problems, can overcome
171
these problems and simultaneously determine an optimized final process de-
172
sign, w.r.t. an economic objective and related problem specific constraints.
173
Such polylithic modeling and solution approaches (Kallrath, 2011) have pre-
174
viously been presented for ED (Kossack et al., 2008), HAD (Skiborowski
175
et al., 2015a), as well as the evaluation of various concepts for energy in-
176
tegration for the basic three distillation sequences for the distillation-based
177
separation of three products (Waltermann and Skiborowski, 2016, 2019).
178
Building on these preceding works, we have developed an optimization-based
179
design approach that enables the efficient computational screening of differ-
180
ent MSA candidates and means for energy integration for both ED and HAD.
181
This approach considers several means for energy integration, including clas-
182
sical heat integration, thermal-coupling and respective dividing wall column
11
183
designs as well as heat-pump assisted distillation in terms of vapor recompres-
184
sion. Compared with the previously considered optimization-based design of
185
energy-integrated distillation sequences (Waltermann and Skiborowski, 2019)
186
the design of the energy-integrated ED and HAD processes is considerably
187
more challenging, since these processes are already integrated and not fea-
188
sible without the additional MSA, which presents an additional degree of
189
freedom. To the best of our knowledge there has not been any publication
190
that proposed and demonstrated a simultaneous and computationally effi-
191
cient approach for the evaluation of various solvent candidates and means for
192
energy-integration. Such efficient tools are of tremendous importance to meet
193
the goals of designing more sustainable, yet economic processes in an ever
194
shrinking time window for process development (Agrawal, 2001). Besides
195
the comparative analysis of the different process concepts, the automatic de-
196
sign method can also be integrated into the process synthesis framework of
197
Kossack et al. (2008). This integration effectively extends the framework
198
by covering the last step of Fig. 2. The developed method is described in
199
further detail in Section 2, before Section 3 presents the results of different
200
applications, including a comparison of both process concepts for ethanol
201
dehydration with different feed specifications, as well as the comparison of
202
different MSA candidates for ED of acetone and methanol, illustrating the
203
importance of a simultaneous consideration of MSA selection and energy in-
204
tegration. Section 4 finally provides a conclusion and an outlook on future
205
work.
12
206
2. Modeling and optimization
207
The developed optimization-based design approach builds on several preced-
208
ing publications. The general approach for model formulation and solution
209
of ED processes was developed by Kossack et al. (2008) and Kraemer et al.
210
(2009b) while the extension to HAD processes was presented by Skiborowski
211
et al. (2015a). The underlying superstructure models are based on equi-
212
librium stage models considering the well-known MESH equations (material
213
balances, equilibrium models, summation constraints and enthalpy balances)
214
(Kister, 1992) in combination with variable locations for feed, reflux and boil-
215
up streams, as initially proposed by Viswanathan and Grossmann (1993). In
216
order to integrate an efficient phase-stability test (Bausa and Marquardt,
217
2000) and allow for a robust computation of VLE/VLLE, these calculations
218
are performed by a set of dedicated algorithms, for which the results and
219
sensitivities are integrated into the overall optimization problem via a set of
220
external equations (Skiborowski et al., 2015a). The external functions used
221
for the thermodynamic calculations are available online through the AVT-
222
SVT website1 .
223
The energy-integrated ED and HAD process variants are furthermore derived
224
from a previously presented design approach (Waltermann and Skiborowski,
225
2019) for the energy integration of simple sequences, considering the sepa-
226
ration of non-ideal mixtures into three products. The following subsections
227
first present a summary of the ED and HAD optimization models, before the 1
http://www.avt.rwth-aachen.de/cms/AVT/Forschung/Software/ iptu/Softwaresammlung-
Prozesssynthese/
13
228
different process modifications for energy integration are described, followed
229
by the solution approach that allows for an automatic initialization and op-
230
timization of the different process variants. An elaborate description of the
231
different model modifications for the energy-integrated process variants is
232
not introduced, as these are equivalent to the modifications for the simple
233
sequences, which were thoroughly described by Waltermann and Skiborowski
234
(2019).
235
2.1. Optimization model for extractive distillation
236
The graphical representation of the superstructure model of the simple ED
237
process is illustrated in Fig. 3. The simple (homogeneous) distillation column model is based on the work of Kraemer et al. (2009a).
Figure 3: Illustration of the superstructure of the simple ED process (left), with variable feed, reflux and boil-up locations, as well as a single equilibrium stage (right) with the different in- and outgoing streams and corresponding variables for flow rates, compositions, enthalpies and feed locations. 238
14
239
The equilibrium stages of the column model are numbered from top (1) to
240
bottom (Nth ), such that stage 1 corresponds to the condenser and stage Nth
241
to the reboiler. Thus, the column itself consists of a maximum number of Nth
242
- 2 theoretical stages. The corresponding MESH equations are further listed
243
for the ED column, while the same equations hold for the solvent recovery
244
column, without the appearance of the second feed stream. The mass balance
245
for each of the equilibrium stages inside the ED column is given by 0 = Ln−1 xn−1,i − Ln xn,i − Vn yn,i + Vn+1 yn+1,i + bF,n FF zF,i
246
247
+ bS,n FS zS,i + bR,n RR,n xR,i + bB,n RB,n yB,i ,
(1)
n = 2, . . . , (Nth − 1), i = 1, . . . , nc
248
with L and V representing the flow rate of the liquid and vapor streams
249
leaving or entering a theoretical stage n. Moreover, x and y correspond to
250
the molar compositions of these liquid and vapor streams. Furthermore, FF
251
and zF as well as FS and zS represent the flow rate and composition of the
252
fresh (azeotropic) feed stream and the solvent feed, for which distribution
253
to a certain theoretical stage n is determined through an additional binary
254
decision variable (bF,n and bS,n ). Similar decision variables (bR,n and bB,n )
255
determine the equilibrium stage to which the reflux and reboil streams with
256
flow rates RR and RB and composition xR and yB are distributed. The
257
corresponding energy balance with the specific enthalpies of liquid, vapor
258
and feed streams hL , hV , hF and hS is 0 = Ln−1 hL,n−1 − Ln hL,n − Vn hV,n + Vn+1 hV,n+1 + bF,n FF hF
259
260
+ bS,n FS hS + bR,n RR,n hL,R + bB,n RB,n hV,B , n = 2, . . . , (Nth − 1). 15
(2)
261
For the condenser (the first equilibrium stage), modified mass and enthalpy
262
balances including the condenser heat duty QC and the distillate flow rate
263
D, as well as additional constraints for the composition xR and enthalpy hL,R
264
of the reflux stream are specified
265
266
NX th −1
0 = Vn+1 yn+1,i − (
RR,j + D)xn,i ,
0 = Vn+1 hV,n+1 − ( 0 = xR,i − x1,i ,
268 269
0 = hL,R − hL,1 .
(3)
j=2
NX th −1
267
n = 1, i = 1, . . . , nc ,
j=2
RR,j + D)hL,n − QC ,
n = 1,
1, . . . , nc ,
(4) (5) (6)
270
The same applies for the reboiler (the last equilibrium stage) with the reboiler
271
heat duty QB and the bottoms flow rate B, as well as the compositions and
272
enthalpy values xB and hL,B of the bottoms product and yB and hV,B of the
273
boil-up stream
274
275
0 = Ln−1 xn−1,i −
NX th −1
0 = Ln−1 hL,n−1 −
j=2
RB,j yn,i − Bxn,i , n = Nth , i = 1, . . . , nc ,
NX th −1 j=2
RB,j hV,n − BhL,n + QB , n = Nth ,
(7)
(8)
276
0 = xB,i − xNth ,i ,
1, . . . , nc ,
(9)
277
0 = yB,i − yNth ,i ,
1, . . . , nc ,
(10)
278
0 = hV,B − hV,Nth ,
(11)
279 280
0 = hL,B − hL,Nth .
(12)
281
The equilibrium relationship between the liquid and the vapor phase on each
282
of the equilibrium stages, as well as the computation of the specific enthalpies 16
283
is realized by means of the aforementioned external equations
284
eVLE = yi − yˆi (x, p) = 0, i
285
ˆ eVLE nc +1 = T − T (x, p) = 0,
(14)
286
ˆ ˆ eVLE nc +2 = hL − hL (x, p, T (x, p)) = 0,
(15)
287 288
ˆ y (x, p), p, Tˆ(x, p)) = 0, eVLE nc +3 = hV − hV (ˆ
(16)
289
which determine the equilibrium vapor composition yˆ(x, p) and temperature
290
Tˆ(x, p) for the current liquid composition x and pressure p, as well as the spe-
291
ˆ L (x, p, Tˆ(x, p)) and vapor enthalpy h ˆ V (ˆ cific liquid h y (x, p), p, Tˆ(x, p)), based
292
on pre-selected thermodynamic property models for the computation of the
293
liquid and vapor fugacitities, as well as specific heat capacities and enthalpies
294
of vaporization. Further details are provied in the article of Skiborowski
295
et al. (2015a). Moreover, further information on the applied thermodynamic
296
models in the scope of the current paper are listed in Section 3 for each
297
of the investigated case studies. The MESH equations for each stage are
298
supplemented by the summation constraints for the liquid and vapor phase
299
compositions
300
X
i = 1, . . . , nc ,
(13)
xn,i = 1,
n = 1, . . . , Nth ,
(17)
yn,i = 1,
n = 1, . . . , Nth .
(18)
i
301 302
X i
17
303
304
305
306
307 308
Closure relationships for each of the binary decision variables Nth X
n=1 Nth X
n=1 N th X
n=1 Nth X
bF,n = 1,
(19)
bS,n = 1,
(20)
bR,n = 1,
(21)
bB,n = 1,
(22)
n=1
309
as well as additional constraints that enforce an ordered location of the dif-
310
ferent feed, reflux and boil-up streams complete the set of equations for the
311
definition of the superstructure model. The optimization model for a sin-
312
gle column is further composed of additional sizing and costing correlations.
313
The sizing of the columns and additional equipment is done as described by
314
Waltermann and Skiborowski (2019), while the costing of the equipment is
315
based on the cost correlation of Guthrie (1969) and Biegler et al. (1997),
316
applying the CEPCI Equipment Index for September 2017 (Economic Indi-
317
cators, 2018) to update the calculated capital costs. The different competing
318
process options are optimized for TAC, which are composed of the annual
319
operating costs (AOC) and the annualized investment costs (AIC). The AIC
320
represents an annuity that reflects the depreciation of the initial investment
321
over a certain plant lifetime, considering a specific rate of return. The consid-
322
ered economic models, including the economic parameters, assumed utilities
323
and references are listed in further detail in the Supplementary material.
324
While the superstructure model of the solvent recovery column is equivalent
325
to the ED column, without the second feed stream, the MSA is recycled as 18
326
bottoms product B from the solvent recovery column to the ED column and
327
mixed with fresh MSA to compensate for solvent losses. For this purpose the
328
overall model is completed by additional mass and energy balances for the
329
mixing of the second feed stream
330
FS = FM SA + B2 − P
(23)
331
FS zS,i = FM SA zM SA,i + (B2 − P )xB2 ,i ,
332 333
FS hS = FM SA hM SA + (B2 − P )hL,B2
i = 1, . . . , nc − 1
(24) (25)
334
and mixed with a makeup stream FM SA to cover for losses in the product
335
streams. Additionally, a potential purge stream P is introduced, which can
336
be utilized in case of a potential accumulation of impurities. Since this is
337
not the case for the different case studies considered in Section 3, the purge
338
stream is limited to a certain upper level (< 1 % of the fresh feed stream)
339
during the initialization and furthermore reduced to zero during the economic
340
optimization, when accounting for fresh solvent cost.
341
2.2. Optimization model for heteroazeotropic distillation
342
The graphical representation of the superstructure model for the simple HAD
343
process is illustrated in Fig. 4. Apparently, the single column superstructures
344
are quite similar to those in the ED process. However, contrary to the ED
345
process, the fresh MSA stream and the MSA-rich recycle stream are mixed
346
with the (azeotropic) feed. The mixed stream is fed to the first column,
347
which is a simple distillation column that is supposed to operate in the ho-
348
mogeneous region of the composition space. The top product of the first
349
column, which is a saturated vapor feed from the partial condenser of the
350
first column, is further introduced as feed stream to the second column. 19
Figure 4: Illustration of the superstructure of the simple HAD process configuration, with variable feed, reflux and boil-up locations.
351
This column performs the heteroazeotropic distillation, for which the top va-
352
por stream leaving the column, which is supposed to be closely located to the
353
light-boiling heteroazeotrope, is first condensed and potentially sub-cooled,
354
before it is separated into two liquid phases in a decanter. Either the single
355
phases or a mixture of both are further recycled back to the heteroazeotropic
356
distillation column as well as the first distillation column. A major difference
357
between the ED and the HAD process is the location of the product streams.
358
Whilst both product streams for the ED process are derived as top products,
359
both products of the HAD process are derived as bottoms product. Although
360
top products have decent advantages with respect to potential impurities in
361
the reboiler, the production of bottoms products can bring other interesting
362
advantages, as will be shown in Section 3.2.
363
One of the major challenges in the design of HAD processes is the correct 20
364
determination of liquid phase-stability, since both VLE and VLLE relation-
365
ships allow for mathematically valid solutions in the whole composition space
366
(Raghunathan and Biegler, 2003; Skiborowski et al., 2015a). This problem
367
had previously been solved by the integration of a numerically efficient hybrid
368
method in a special implementation of the aforementioned external equations
369
(Skiborowski et al., 2015a). While the correct VLE or VLLE solution is first
370
determined based on a homotopy continuation approach (Bausa and Mar-
371
quardt, 2000), resulting VLLE solutions for column equilibrium stages are
372
further mapped to a quasi-homogeneous VLE result, including the compu-
373
tations of the specific enthalpies. This approach allows for the utilization of
374
the same MESH model as described in Eq. (1)-(22) for the ED columns, with
375
the exception of the decanter and the connectivity between the decanter and
376
the columns. The latter modifications are further described in the follow-
377
ing, while the interested reader is referred to the article of Skiborowski et al. (2015a) for a more detailed description.
Figure 5: Illustration of the decanter and the variables related to the computation of the in- and outgoing streams. 378 379
Besides the computation of the V(L)LE relationship, which is used to model
380
the liquid phase split in the decanter, the decanter is modeled by the fol-
381
lowing set of MESH equations that match to the graphical representation in 21
382
Fig. 5:
383
LC xC,i = LI xIi + LII xII i ,
384
LC hL,C = LI hIL + LII hII L ,
385
Ld1 xd1,i = ξ I LI xIi + ξ II LII xII i ,
386
Ld1 hd1 = ξ I LI hIL + ξ II LII hII L ,
i = 1, . . . , nc ,
(26) (27)
i = 1, . . . , nc ,
(28) (29)
387
Ld2 xd2,i = (1 − ξ I )LI xIi + (1 − ξ II )LII xII i ,
388 389
Ld2 hd2 = (1 − ξ I )LI hIL + (1 − ξ II )LII hII L .
i = 1, . . . , nc ,
(30) (31)
390
Eq. (26) and (27) provide the mass and enthalpy balances that link the
391
molar flow rates, compositions and specific enthalpies of the condensed top
392
vapor stream (Lc , xc , hL,c ) and the single liquid phases resulting from the
393
liquid phase split (LI , xI , hIL ) and (LII , xII , hII L ). The flow rate, composition
394
and specific enthalpy of the two recycle streams (Ld1 , xd1 , hd1 ) to the HAD
395
column and (Ld2 , xd2 , hd2 ) as recycle stream to the first column, are further
396
controlled by the split ratios ξ I and ξ II , as introduced in the mass and
397
enthalpy balances in Eq. (28)-(31). Thus, either both recylce streams can be
398
a mixture of the single liquid phases or either one can be limited to a single
399
phase.
400
The consideration of a partial condenser for the first column results in the
401
following modifications of the mass and enthalpy balances of the condenser
402
(Eq. (3) and (4)):
403
404 405
0 = Vn+1 yn+1,i −
NX th −1
0 = Vn+1 hV,n+1 −
RR,j xn,i + Dyn,i ,
n = 1, i = 1, . . . , nc ,
(32)
j=2
NX th −1 j=2
RR,j hL,n + DhV,n − QC , 22
n = 1.
(33)
406
For the HAD column with the decanter, the whole set of equations for the
407
condenser (Eq. (3)-(6)) is to be replaced by the mass and enthalpy balances
408
0 = Vn+1 yn+1,i − LC xC,i ,
409 410
0 = Vn+1 hV,n+1 − LC hL,C − QC ,
n = 1, i = 1, . . . , nc , n = 1,
(34) (35)
411
as well as additional equations that link the first outlet stream of the decanter
412
with the reflux stream to the HAD column:
413
0=
NX th −1 j=2
RR,j − Ld1 ,
414
0 = xR,i − xd1,i ,
415 416
0 = hL,R − hd1 .
(36)
1, . . . , nc ,
(37) (38)
417
The mixed feed stream Fmix of the first column is further determined based
418
on the following mass and enthalpy balances:
419
Fmix = FF + FM SA + Ld2 ,
420
421 422
(39)
Fmix zFmix ,i = FF zF,i + FM SA zM SA,i + Ld2 xd2,i , Fmix hFmix = FF hF + FM SA hM SA + Ld2 hd2 .
i = 1, . . . , nc − 1
(40) (41)
423
The same sizing and costing correlations for the ED process are considered
424
for the HAD process as well and are listed in the Supplementary mate-
425
rial. Thereby, the additional costs for the decanter are not considered in
426
the economic evaluation, which is a pragmatic simplification, since the dis-
427
engagement time required for its sizing can only be obtained reliably by lab
428
experiments (Mersmann et al., 2011).
23
429
2.3. Heat and mass integrated processes ED and HAD processes
430
Based on the initial superstructure formulations of the ED and HAD pro-
431
cess, different means for heat and mass integration are considered, for which
432
a graphical illustration is presented in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7. For visual con-
433
venience, the potential stream distribution indicated for the simple process
434
configurations in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 is spared in these illustrations. As illus-
435
trated, a heat-integrated option, the vapor recompression for both individual
436
columns, as well as a thermally-coupled and an equipment-integrated divid-
437
ing wall column equivalent of the thermally-coupled process are considered.
438
All of these energy-integrated process variants, which are further described in
439
more detail, are automatically derived in an automated procedure, through
440
constraint modifications and additional sub-models, starting from the simple
441
non-integrated process concepts, as will be elaborated in Section 2.4. The
442
following subsections provide further detail on the energy-integrated ED and
443
HAD process configurations, while the reader is redirected to our previous
444
article on the design of energy-integrated simple distillation processes (Wal-
445
termann and Skiborowski, 2019) for the respective model modifications.
446
2.3.1. Extractive distillation
447
While the ED process requires recycling of the MSA and accounts for the
448
mixed solvent stream as a second feed to the ED column, the modification
449
for the energy-integrated process concepts are equivalent to those presented
450
for the direct split sequence for a ternary product separation by Waltermann
451
and Skiborowski (2019). They are illustrated in Fig. 6.
452
For the thermally-coupled (TC) ED process, the reboiler of the first column is
453
removed and the liquid stream from the bottom of the ED column is directly 24
454
fed as feed stream to the second column, while the boil-up stream for the ED
455
column is provided by a vapor side stream from the second column. Although
456
the thermal coupling may enable an overall reduction of the energy require-
457
ment, as well as a reduced investment by elimination of the reboiler, the
458
vapor production is shifted completely to the reboiler of the second column,
459
which operates at a higher temperature. Consequently, energy savings may
460
not directly translate into reduced operational costs, especially in the case of
461
a very high-boiling entrainer (Wu et al., 2013). Additional cost-savings can
462
be established by means of an equipment integration, in terms of the imple-
463
mentation of the TC ED process in a dividing wall column (DWC). While
464
the superstructure model based on the MESH equations is identical for the
465
TC and DWC configuration, sizing and costing correlations are adapted, as
466
described by Waltermann and Skiborowski (2019).
467
For a direct heat integration (HI) between both columns in the ED process, a
468
sufficient pressure difference between the operating pressures of both columns
469
needs to be established, such that the reboiler of the ED column can be par-
470
tially or fully integrated with the condenser of the second column to minimize
471
the external energy requirement. Although Fig. 6 indicates two separate heat
472
exchangers connected by a dashed arrow, the optimization model considers
473
only a single heat exchanger for the heat integration. The corresponding
474
optimization model further includes optional auxiliary heat exchangers to
475
compensate for the difference between the condenser and reboiler heat duty,
476
as well as additional pre-heating of the feed stream to the second column, in
477
order to reach the saturation temperature at the increased pressure.
478
The heat pump assisted ED process considering vapor recompression (VRC)
25
Figure 6: Heat and mass integrated ED processes: Thermally-coupled (TC) (top left), dividing wall column (bottom left), direct heat integration (top right) and mechanical vapor recompression (bottom right).
479
may enable significant savings in terms of energy requirements and operat-
480
ing costs, but at a considerable increase in capital costs due to the required
481
compressor. VRC can be considered as a state-of-the-art industrial system
482
for energy integration in binary splits, which has been applied specifically 26
483
for close boiling systems (Kiss et al., 2012). Despite the comparably large
484
temperature difference between top and bottoms products in the ED process,
485
VRC is of particular interest for the improvement of ED processes (Gerbaud
486
et al., 2019). While the superstructure allows for a partial or complete bypass
487
of the VRC section, two additional heat exchangers are integrated for super-
488
heating the vapor up-front the compressor in order to avoid condensation in
489
the compressor, as well as behind the valve to ensure saturation conditions
490
for the reflux to the column. The compression is modeled as isentropic with
491
a specific isentropic efficiency (Harwardt and Marquardt, 2012; Waltermann
492
and Skiborowski, 2019). As for the HI variant, the separate heat exchangers
493
connected by the dashed arrow are considered as single heat exchanger in
494
the optimization model.
495
2.3.2. Heteroazeotropic distillation processes
496
Similar to the ED process, the modification for the energy-integrated HAD
497
concepts are equivalent to those presented for the indirect split sequence for
498
a ternary product separation by Waltermann and Skiborowski (2019). The
499
major differences are the integration of the decanter in the HAD column and
500
the recycle stream to the first column, which is mixed with the fresh feed
501
and MSA. The different energy-integrated process options are illustrated in
502
Fig. 7,consisting of a thermally-coupled process configuration, a dividing wall
503
column as well as directly heat integrated distillation columns and heat-pump
504
assisted distillation by means of vapor recompression.
505
For the thermally-coupled (TC) HAD process, the condenser of the first col-
506
umn is eliminated, such that the top vapor stream is introduced as feed
507
stream to the HAD column, while the reflux to the first column is provided by 27
Figure 7: Heat and mass integrated HAD processes: Thermally-coupled (TC) (top left), dividing wall column (bottom left), direct heat integration (top right) and mechanical vapor recompression (bottom right).
508
a liquid side stream from the HAD column. Thereby, both reboilers are main-
509
tained and only the heat duty for condensation is shifted from the first to the
510
second column, for which condensation is performed at a lower temperature.
511
The thermal coupling can again result in considerable overall energy savings
512
(Kiss et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2014), while especially the equipment integration
513
of the thermally-coupled process in terms of a dividing wall column (DWC)
514
offers additional investment savings. As both reboilers are maintained, possi-
515
ble energy savings should directly translate into operating cost savings, unless 28
516
condensation in the HAD column cannot be performed with cheap cooling
517
water (Wu et al., 2014). The absence of a vapor split for the DWC variant
518
of the HAD column makes it particularly interesting from the operational
519
point of view.
520
For direct heat integration (HI), the first column of the HAD process is op-
521
erated at elevated pressure, such that the top vapor stream can be used as
522
heat source for the reboiler of the HAD column. Similar to the ED process,
523
the separate heat exchangers connected by the dashed arrow are modeled as
524
single heat exchanger and additional heat exchangers are considered in order
525
to compensate for the difference between the condenser and reboiler heat
526
duty, as well as additional pre-heating of the feed stream to the first column.
527
Same as for the ED process, mechanical vapor recompression (VRC) enables
528
a partial or complete integration between the reboiler and condenser of each
529
individual column in the HAD process. The separate heat exchangers con-
530
nected by the dashed arrows are considered as single heat exchanger in the
531
optimization model, but are only considered present in the economic evalu-
532
ation in case the VRC system is actually utilized.
533
2.4. Solution procedure
534
The proposed approach is termed ”optimization-based design”, since all indi-
535
vidual problems in the solution procedure are solved as undetermined math-
536
ematical programming problems, especially considering the inequality con-
537
straints for the product specifications rather than any fixation of the design
538
degrees of freedom (such as energy duties, product streams or distillate-to-
539
feed ratios). As already mentioned, a polylithic modeling and solution ap-
540
proach (Kallrath, 2011) is applied, which allows for an automatic initializa29
541
tion and optimization of the different process configurations. The approach
542
builds on the topological analysis of the composition space and initial mass
543
balance calculations for the individual column of the basic process configura-
544
tions of ED and HAD illustrated in Fig. 1. By approximating the potential
545
product compositions of the individual columns, these are initialized con-
546
sidering flash calculations for linearized composition profiles. Subsequently
547
mass balances and enthalpy balances are added and the individual columns
548
are optimized for minimum energy duties, considering a fixed column size
549
with a maximum number of equilibrium stages. For both extractive and
550
heteroazeotropic distillation, the individual columns are than connected in
551
series (first to second), while depending on the specific process variant the
552
necessary modifications for heat and mass integration are performed. As the
553
last step of the automatic initialization procedure, the recycle streams are
554
closed and the energy duty is minimized once more for the final product spec-
555
ifications. Finally, all constraints on feed, reflux and boil-up locations are
556
relaxed and the process design is optimized for minimum TAC, for which the
557
additional sizing and costing models are added to the optimization model.
30
Figure 8: Automated initialization and solution procedure for ED and HAD processes
31
558
The sequence of steps in the polylithic modeling and solution approach are
559
summarized in Fig. 8. The developed solution procedure is a direct ex-
560
tension of the design approach for energy integration distillation sequences
561
(Waltermann and Skiborowski, 2019). The final mixed-integer non-linear
562
programming (MINLP) problem, which includes the integer decisions on the
563
number of equilibrium stages and feed positions, is solved as a series of suc-
564
cessively relaxed nonlinear programming (NLP) problems. This approach
565
proofed to result in improved robustness and numerical efficiency of the cal-
566
culations in previous design optimizations (Kraemer et al., 2009b; Kraemer
567
and Marquardt, 2010; Skiborowski et al., 2014, 2015a). As in the reformu-
568
lation of mathematical programming problems with equilibrium constraints,
569
additional nonlinear complementary constraints are added as penalty terms
570
in the objective function to ensure that integer values are obtained for the
571
relaxed binary variables (Skiborowski et al., 2015a).
572
For the problem definition, only the feed and product specifications as well as
573
the thermodynamic model and some specifications for initialization need to
574
be defined. The latter includes the maximum number of equilibrium stages
575
as well as initial guesses for feed locations and entrainer-to-feed ratio. Since
576
the resulting optimization problem is highly non-linear and non-convex, the
577
obtained solution is limited to a local optima. While current research activi-
578
ties are dedicated to extend the optimization approach in order to overcome
579
this limitation through an additional global search (Kruber et al., 2019), the
580
sensitivity of the applied optimization approach with respect to the initial
581
structure was checked for the subsequently addressed case studies, to check
582
for the possible entrapment in local solutions of poor quality.
32
583
3. Case Studies
584
In order to demonstrate the capabilities of the developed optimization-based
585
design method, its application is illustrated for three case studies in the sub-
586
sequent subsections. Setting up the problem specification and constraints
587
for the individual case studies requires only few modifications, providing a
588
general design method, as presented in Section 2. All computations have
589
been performed with GAMS V22.7.2., using SNOPT as NLP solver, on a
590
R stand-alone PC with an Intel CoreTM i7-7700 CPU with 3.6 GHz. Infor-
591
mation on the economic evaluation and the applied thermodynamic models
592
and parameters are provided in the Supplementary material.
593
3.1. Extractive distillation of methanol from a ternary mixture with acetoni-
594
trile and benzene
595
The first case study investigates the separation of methanol from a mix-
596
ture with acetonitrile and benzene, as considered by Zhu et al. (2016) and
597
Wang et al. (2018). The components in the mixture are representative of
598
common solvents in the chemical and pharmaceutical industry and the con-
599
sidered feed stream is a saturated liquid with a flow rate of 10 mol/s and
600
a composition of 25 mol-% acetonitrile, 10 mol-% benzene and 65 mol-%
601
methanol. The complex topology of this ternary mixture, which possesses
602
three binary azeotropes that separate the composition space into three dis-
603
tillation regions, impedes a direct methanol recovery by simple distillation,
604
as indicated in Fig. 9.
605
The objective of the process design study is to evaluate the cost-optimal de-
606
sign of an ED process, using chlorobenzene as a suitable MSA (Wang et al.,
33
Figure 9:
Topology of ternary mixture of acetonitrile, benzene and methanol including
simple distillation boundaries and considered feed composition for first case study.
607
2018). The cost of the MSA is assumed to be 1000 $/t2 for the poten-
608
tial make-up stream. Methanol is to be recovered with a purity of at least
609
99.5 mol-% and a recovery of at least 99.5 %, while the mole fraction of
610
chlorobenzene in the distillate of the solvent recovery column shall also be
611
less than 0.01 mol-%. VLE calculations are based on the Wilson g E -model
612
in combination with the extended Antoine equation and DIPPR correlations
613
for the specific heat capacities and the enthalpy of vaporization. All param-
614
R eters are extracted from the Aspen Plus APV-V88 VLE-IG and PURE32
2
exchange rate of 0.8465 e$
34
615
database. Optimization-based design calculations are performed for the sim-
616
ple, as well as the HI, TC, DWC and VRC configurations, for which the
617
superstructures of the individual columns offer up to 80 equilibrium stages.
618
For the economic assessment a depreciation within 10 years is considered.
619
The HI ED process is identified as the cost optimal solution. The detailed
620
design of the HI ED process is depicted in Fig. 10. In order to exploit
621
the heat from the condenser of the second column for partial integration of
622
the reboiler of the first column, the second column is operated at 2.4 bar.
623
Thereby the external steam demand for column 1 is reduced by 38 %, while
624
additional 94.3 kW are required to preheat the feed to the second column to
625
saturation conditions. Overall, HI allows for the reduction of external heat
626
demand from 1008 kW to 803 kW, when compared to the simple ED process,
627
resulting in AOC savings of about 17 %.
628
However, overall TAC savings of just 2 % are obtained, due an increase in
629
AIC. Fig. 11 illustrates the cost distribution of the optimized simple and
630
energy-integrated ED processes. Further details for each of the process de-
631
signs are provided in the Supplementary material. While the results indicate
632
only little economic saving potential for the HI variant, the potential appli-
633
cation of VRC is not utilized as the potential energy savings are not high
634
enough to cover for the additional investment for the compressor. Moreover,
635
the thermal coupling in case of the TC and DWC variant results in even
636
higher costs as a higher steam grade has to be used. The latter is in agree-
637
ment with investigations of Wu et al. (2013), who evaluated DWC for ED
638
for several chemical systems and concluded that economic savings can only
639
be obtained for few certain cases.
35
Figure 10: Detailed results of the optimized design of the HI ED process for the separation of methanol from a ternary, azeotropic mixture of acetonitrile, benzene, and methanol.
640
While only little improvements can be obtained by means of energy inte-
641
gration in case of this ED process, the optimization-based design method
642
enables the efficient evaluation of all process configurations. For all five pro-
643
cess configurations optimized designs were obtained within less than an hour
644
of computational time, without parallelization of the computations. Thus, a
645
quick evaluation of the saving potential is enabled based on a quantitative
646
evaluation of optimized process configurations.
36
Figure 11: Overview of cost distribution for the simple and energy-integrated optimized ED process designs for the separation of methanol from a ternary, azeotropic mixture of acetonitrile, benzene, and methanol.
647
3.2. Dehydration of ethanol by ED and HAD
648
Alcohol and ethanol dehydration in specific are the most prominent exam-
649
ples for ED, as well HAD. Specifically the purification of bioethanol from
650
dilute fermentation broth is considered quite energy intensive (Singh and
651
Rangaiah, 2017). Consequently, Kiss and Suszwalak (2012) already inves-
652
tigated the saving potential of DWC designs for ED and HAD processes,
653
concluding that both processes enable energy savings compared to the non-
654
integrated processes. Considering the same pre-concentrated feed stream of
655
100 kmol/h with an ethanol fraction of 85 mol-%, the optimization-based
656
design approach is first applied to evaluate the different options for energy
657
integration for both ED and HAD. According to international standards and
658
as considered by Kiss and Suszwalak (2012), the bioethanol product has to 37
659
contain less than 2 wt-% water, translated to a purity of at least 99.5 mol-
660
%, while the water byproduct has to have a purity of at least 99.9 mol-%.
661
Ethylene glycol and cyclohexane are selected as preferred and established sol-
662
vents for ED and HAD respectively (Singh and Rangaiah, 2017). For both, a
663
price of 1000 $/t3 is considered for the potential make-up stream. The ther-
664
modynamic properties of both systems are modeled by the NRTL model in
665
combination with the extended Antoine equations and DIPPR correlations
666
R for the specific enthalpies, using parameters from the Aspen Plus APV-V88
667
VLE-IG and PURE32 database. For the economic assessment a depreciation within 3 years is considered.
Figure 12: Overview of cost distribution for the simple and energy-integrated optimized ED and HAD process designs for the dehydration of a pre-concentrated ethanol stream. 668
3
exchange rate of 0.8465 e$
38
669
Fig. 12 illustrates the cost distribution of the optimized simple and energy-
670
integrated ED and HAD processes. Obviously, the ED process configurations
671
are significantly less expensive than the HAD process, with the simple ED
672
process being the most economic choice for the given problem specifications.
673
Again, the compressor sections in the VRC variant are bypassed for both ED
674
and HAD. For the ED process, no HI design was derived, since the necessary
675
operating pressure for heat integration between both columns requires the
676
reboiler temperature of the second column to exceed the maximum tempera-
677
ture limit of 492 K, which was specified based on a limitation of the available
678
utilities. HI for the HAD results in almost the exact same TAC as the simple
679
variant, however, with a considerable shift between AIC and AOC. While for
680
the ethanol dehydration the economic advantage of the thermally-coupled
681
side rectifier over the thermally-coupled ED process are significant, the po-
682
tential benefit of the side-rectifier depends majorly on the contribution of
683
investment costs to the overall TAC values. Since for the other case studies,
684
the AIC contribute (significantly) less to the overall TAC than for the ethanol
685
dehydration, the expected economic advantages of the thermally-coupled side
686
rectifier over the thermally-coupled ED process are less pronounced and only
687
the thermally-coupled ED option is considered.
688
Similar to the previous case study, the TC and DWC options result in in-
689
creased costs for the ED process, particularly since both process need to use a
690
higher steam grade for their sole reboiler covering the total heat duty. For the
691
TC process as depicted in Fig. 6, the reboiler of the second column produces
692
the complete vapor stream that is split by the thermal coupling between the
693
first column and the second column’s rectifying section. Since the separation
39
694
in the extractive column is commonly more difficult than the solvent recovery,
695
the majority of the vapor will be transferred to the first column. However,
696
due to the large vapor load in the second column’s stripping section, the di-
697
ameter of the second column will be relatively large. While the consideration
698
of a constant column diameter might even result in hydrodynamic problems
699
in the rectifying section, moving the stripping section to the first column and
700
operating a thermally-coupled side rectifier (that corresponds to the second
701
column’s rectifying section) may also provide additional cost savings. The
702
potential of such a thermally-coupled side rectifier was further evaluated in
703
addition to the standard TC process of Fig. 6 for the current case study and the results of the design optimization are compared in Table 1. Table 1:
Information on cost and sizes of the optimized thermally-coupled ED process
and the thermally-coupled side rectifier.
thermally-coupled
ED process with
ED process
thermally-coupled side rectifier
HCol1 [m]
16.0
19.0
DCol1 [m]
1.1
1.02
HCol2 [m]
8.5
7.0
DCol2 [m]
1.03
0.26
AIC [ke/a]
301.0
129.4
AOC [ke/a]
591.8
520.6
TAC [ke/a]
892.9
770.7
704 705
While for the initial TC configuration both columns have similar diameters,
706
the side-rectifier configuration enables a significantly smaller column diame40
707
ter for the side rectifier, while the height of the first column HCol1 increases
708
due to the movement of the stripping section of the second column. However,
709
the AIC are significantly smaller for the side rectifier. Moreover, as the side
710
rectifier is optimized as an individual process, the optimization exploits the
711
reduced column diameter by means of an increased number of theoretical
712
stages in the individual sections, such that the overall energy demand and
713
the AOC are also reduced in the optimized process design. Overall, the TAC
714
of the thermally-coupled side rectifier is about 14 % smaller than the initial
715
TC option, so that this option becomes competitive to the extractive DWC.
716
However, for the considered case study the simple ED process is econom-
717
ically still slightly more favorable than the process configuration with the thermally-coupled side rectifier.
Figure 13: Economic and energetic comparison of simple extractive distillation process with ED-DWC 718
41
719
In contrast to the thermally-coupled and DWC options for extractive distil-
720
lation, TC and DWC allow for cost improvements of the HAD process (cf.
721
Fig. 12). This is again in agreement with the results of Wu et al. (2013, 2014)
722
who reported a larger potential of DWC for application in HAD. A detailed
723
comparison of the simple and DWC process options for ED is illustrated in
724
Fig. 13.
725
Despite the economic benefits of the simple process, it is important to note
726
that the DWC variant enables energy savings of about 6 %, being quite com-
727
parable to the 9 % energy savings reported by Kiss et al. (2012). Yet, the
728
shift of the complete energy provision to the highest temperature level in
729
the single reboiler, requires the use of high pressure steam, due to the high
730
boiling temperature of ethylene glycol. Thus, the possible energy savings
731
do not translate into cost savings in terms of AOC, as pointed out by Wu
732
et al. (2013). Moreover, though the dimensions of the single DWC shell are
733
comparable to the extractive column of the simple process, due to the more
734
complicated construction of the split-shell arrangement that is considered by
735
a surcharge factor of 20 % for the DWC, the savings in investment costs for
736
the DWC are also negligible, when comparing the AIC values of simple and
737
DWC variants of the extractive distillation process.
738
Interestingly the derived results change substantially based on the feed com-
739
position, as has been shown in our preceding work (Waltermann et al., 2017),
740
in which we investigated a feed of 10 mol/s with an ethanol content of just
741
6 mol-%, representative of an aqueous ethanol stream from fermentation
742
broth, without additional pre-concentration. In this case, for which the re-
743
sults of the optimization-based design are summarized in Fig. 14.
42
Figure 14: Annualized costs of different process variants for the dehydration of a diluted ethanol feed with 6 mol-% ethanol (Waltermann et al., 2017)
744
Obviously, the HAD process is for this problem specification significantly less
745
expensive than the ED process, whereas the DWC design of the HAD pro-
746
cess is the economically favorable choice. In order to further elucidate the
747
importance of the pre-concentration for the ED process, the optimization-
748
based design is performed for an adapted feed stream with an ethanol content
749
of 6 mol-% and a flowrate of 1416.7 kmol/h, which corresponds to the feed
750
stream considered by Kiss and Suszwalak (2012), prior the pre-concentration.
751
This feed flowrate results in a capacity of about 31000 t/a bioethanol, which
752
also corresponds well to other publications (Singh and Rangaiah, 2017). In
753
accordance with the previous results the simple ED and the DWC version
754
of the HAD process are investigated, while an additional beer column for
755
pre-concentration is considered as well for the ED process. The total heat 43
756
duties and the cost distribution for the three optimized process variants are
757
listed in Table 2, while the design results for the two most economic process variants are depicted in Fig. 15. Table 2:
Energy and cost values for ethanol dehydration of diluted feed by simple ED,
ED with additional pre-concentration and DWC version of HAD
simple ED
simple ED
HAD-DWC
with pre-concentration free xpre D
xpre D = 0.85
QB,tot [kW]
18965.0
5409.3
6004.0
6383.0
AOC [Me/a]
4.80
1.03
1.16
1.12
AIC [Me/a]
0.95
0.53
0.62
0.58
TAC [Me/a]
5.76
1.56
1.78
1.71
758 759
Obviously the ED process with pre-concentration in the beer column results
760
in a much more economic design, compared to the simple ED process for the
761
modified feed specification. However, according to the optimization results
762
that consider all three columns simultaneously the preferred economic process
763
design performs a pre-concentration from 6 mol-% to 79.2 mol-% ethanol, in-
764
stead of the previously considered 85 mol-%. Specifying a pre-concentration
765
to 85 mol-% in the beer column results in a significant increases of the re-
766
quired energy demand and an overall increase in TAC from 1.56 Me/a to
767
1.78 Me/a. Despite the feed-forward connection of the pre-concentration
768
and the ED, there is a clear interdependency between both steps, such that
769
simultaneous optimization of the combined process is mandatory.
770
Unlike the ED process the increased amount of water has a much less decisive 44
Figure 15: Illustration of simple ED with pre-concentration (left) and HAD-DWC (right) for ethanol dehydration of a low concentrated feed
771
effect on the DWC version of the HAD process. While the optimized design
772
has about 10 % higher TAC compared to the ED process with beer column,
773
it is also only about 21 % more expensive compared to the previous design
774
for the pre-concentrated feed (cf. Figure 12).
775
Considering the cost of the pre-concentration and the beer column in the
776
ED design (TAC of 1.78 Me/a for the 85 mol-% case) it can be concluded
777
that the HAD process does not benefit from such separate pre-concentration,
778
while the HAD process is presumably also more flexible with respect to feed
779
fluctuations. The latter should be evaluated further based on a fixed design
780
and process performance evaluations, accounting for the operation limita-
781
tions of the selected internals and performance variations for variable gas
782
and liquid loads.
45
783
Since the computational times for each of the evaluated process variants did
784
not exceed 15 minutes, the complete case study can be evaluated in less than
785
4 h of computational time. This time could be reduced further through par-
786
allelization of the evaluations by means of simple multi-threading, given a
787
sufficient amount of licenses. The case study clearly demonstrates that the
788
proposed design approach can be used to efficiently evaluate ED and HAD
789
and potential means for energy integration for a specific separation problem
790
and variations in the problem specifications.
791
3.3. Separation of acetone and methanol by ED
792
The last case study investigates the separation of acetone and methanol by
793
means of ED with various MSA, similar to the preceding work of Kossack
794
et al. (2008) and Skiborowski et al. (2015b). However, the current investi-
795
gation includes the different means for energy-integration and evaluates the
796
effect on the preferred solvent choice. The considered saturated liquid feed
797
consists of an equimolar mixture of acetone and methanol with a flow rate of
798
540 kmol/h. The considered MSA candidates correspond to the selection of
799
Kossack et al. (2008) and are listed in Table 3 with their corresponding costs,
800
adopted from Skiborowski et al. (2015b). The thermodynamic properties are
801
calculated by the UNIQUAC g E model, the extended Antoine equations and
802
DIPPR correlations, for which the parameters are taken from the Aspen
803
R Plus APV-V88 VLE-IG and PURE32 database. Purity requirements for
804
both products are 99.5 mol-% and the plant is depreciated for a period of
805
10 years.
806
As indicated in Figure 16, DMSO represents the most favorable solvent
807
choice, based on the economic performance of the optimized simple ED pro46
Table 3: Considered MSA candidates and their specific costs (exchange rate of 0.8465 e$ ) for acetone/methanol separation by means of ED.
MSA
Costs
ethanol
800 $/t
chlorobenzene 1000 $/t DMSO
1400 $/t
water
0.03 $/t
p-xylene
1250 $/t
808
cess. While its high boiling point mandates the use of high pressure steam,
809
the low energy requirement results in the overall lowest AOC, which for the
810
comparable high depreciation time determines largely the TAC.
811
Only the AOC of the water-based ED process are comparable, while chloroben-
812
zene results in considerably higher AOC and around 25 % higher TAC. The
813
TAC of the p-xylene and ethanol-based ED process are significantly higher,
814
being more than 50 % and 90 % more expensive compared to the DMSO-
815
based ED process. It has to be mentioned that despite the large price differ-
816
ences of the considered MSA, especially water, the solvent make-up stream
817
is negligible small, resulting in a maximum cost share of less than 2.4 % of
818
the TAC, also due to the high product purity specifications.
819
Based on these initial results it is further checked if the consideration of en-
820
ergy integration can alter this ranking, focussing on the first three solvents,
821
since energy savings of more than 50 % are highly unlikely. The results of
822
this evaluation are further summarized in Figure 17, for which the dashed
823
line indicates the TAC of the simple DMSO process, which serves as refer47
Figure 16: Economic results for the optimized ED processes for the separation of acetone and methanol with different MSA. 824
ence value for the subsequent evaluation. A HI variant of the DMSO process
825
is discarded, since the reboiler temperature of the solvent recovery column
826
would exceed the maximum temperature limit of 492 K, which was specified
827
based on a limitation of the available utilities. The TC and DWC options are
828
both more expensive, since despite an overall reduced heat duty, the overall
829
AOC increase significantly due to the increased high pressure steam require-
830
ment, since all of the heat has to be supplied at the highest temperature of
831
the process.
832
Only the VRC option allows for slight savings of 2 % in TAC. However,
833
the VRC section is only utilized in the extractive distillation column, but
48
Figure 17: Economic results for the optimized energy-integrated ED processes for the separation of acetone and methanol with different MSA.
834
bypassed in the recovery column. In fact, despite the relatively high tem-
835
perature difference between reboiler and condenser of about 33 K for the
836
extractive column, the necessary compression can be performed with low
837
energy requirements and offers economic savings. For the recovery column,
838
however, the VRC offers no saving potential due to the very high temper-
839
ature difference of 126 K between reboiler and condenser. Altogether, the
840
potential AOC savings are, however, canceled mostly out by the increased
841
AIC for the required compressor.
842
For chlorobenzene, the results are comparable and none of the options for
843
energy integration apart from the VRC allows for TAC savings. As for the 49
844
DMSO-based process, the VRC option allows for a slight reduction of 9 % of
845
the TAC, which however does not suffice to outperform the DMSO process.
846
The situation looks quite different for the water-based ED process. While
847
the thermally-coupled process configurations also do not offer economic ben-
848
efits, both HI and VRC can significantly improve the economic performance,
849
even beyond the DMSO-based process. In fact, the HI process configura-
850
tion becomes the overall most attractive process, being 21 % less expensive
851
than the simple DMSO-based process. Thus, it has to be concluded that the
852
consideration of energy integrated process concepts can effectively alter the
853
results of the solvent screening.
854
Besides the economic saving potential, water offers additional benefits, being
855
sustainable, non-toxic and extremely cheap. The comparably big impact of
856
energy integration for the water-based ED process stems from the compara-
857
bly low boiling point of water, which on the one hand enables the use of low
858
pressure stream and on the other hand results in smaller temperature differ-
859
ences between the different heat exchanger’s that are to be integrated. The
860
process design of the optimized HI ED process with water is depicted in Fig-
861
ure 18. Allowing for the integration of around 6 MW, it reduces the external
862
heat duty by 39 % compared to the simple ED process. Consequently, MSA
863
selection should be performed with the additional consideration of energy
864
integration.
50
Figure 18: Detailed design of HI ED as optimal process variant for case study 3
865
The case study illustrates that energy integration should not be considered
866
as a final post-processing step for the best solvent choice for non-integrated
867
processes, but rather be included in the solvent screening. While feasibility
868
criteria can be considered for a pre-evaluation of suitable solvents, the final
869
solvent screening should be performed on the basis of the optimized process
870
design, since the complex interactions between solvent properties, process
871
performance and energy integration potential cannot be depicted by simple
872
heuristics.
51
873
4. Conclusion
874
The design of extractive and heteroazeotropic distillation processes is a chal-
875
lenging task, which requires the correct identification of a mass separating
876
agent, as well as the optimization of an integrated closed-loop process, consid-
877
ering the primary separation and solvent recovery. On top of that, different
878
means for energy integration can be considered, which can very well alter the
879
results in terms of optimal solvent choice and process selection. While sol-
880
vent selection and process design are nowadays supported by computational
881
tools, there are still distinct limitations that need to be resolved in order to
882
determine the best solvent and process combination. MSA selection is usu-
883
ally focussed on simplified criteria, which are important for pre-screening but
884
should not determine the final choice, whereas process simulators oftentimes
885
lack the necessary capabilities for process optimization and require a tedious
886
initialization and optimization approach, relying to a large extend on manual
887
tuning and expert knowledge. The potential of energy integration is rarely
888
evaluated for more than the finally selected solvents.
889
The presented optimization-based method for the design of extractive and
890
heteroazeotropic distillation processes overcomes the problems related to the
891
use of commercial process simulators and enables a direct evaluation of dif-
892
ferent means for energy integration for multiple solvents. The capabilities of
893
the presented design approach are illustrated for three different case stud-
894
ies, highlighting different features of the proposed method. The application
895
for the separation of methanol from the ternary mixture with acetonitrile
896
and benzene by extractive distillation with chlorobenzene shows that the
897
design method is can be applied to multi-azeotropic mixtures with four or 52
898
even potentially more components. The ethanol dehydration case study il-
899
lustrates how effective extractive and heteroazeotropic distillation processes
900
with potential energy-integration can be evaluated and compared for varying
901
problem specifications. Finally, the separation of the acetone and methanol
902
mixture illustrates the potential for an integrated evaluation of solvent se-
903
lection and energy integration. It further highlights the advantages of such
904
a simultaneous consideration in determining the optimal process design.
905
As presented for the case studies, the approach facilitates a computationally
906
efficient quantitative comparison of the different process concepts for specific
907
separation problems and enables a detailed analysis of the benefits and lim-
908
itations of these process concepts through modification of feed and product
909
specifications. While the results of the case studies validate previous results
910
for the concept of dividing wall columns in extractive and heteroazeotropic
911
distillation, reported by Wu et al. (2013, 2014), the presented design method
912
enables an efficient evaluation of the potential and the comparison with al-
913
ternative means for energy integration. It provides an important computa-
914
tionally efficient tool for the integration of solvent and process design, which
915
is mandatory for the evaluation of a multitude of solvent candidates, which
916
cannot rely on manual initialization and optimization.
917
Future work will investigate the utilization of the current approach for com-
918
puter aided solvent screening and design, as in the work of Kruber et al.
919
(2018), exploring the already indicated potential for parallelization of the
920
required computations. Furthermore, in order to overcome the potential en-
921
trapment in sub-optimal local solutions of the highly nonlinear mixed-integer
922
optimization problems, the extension of the optimization approach to a hy-
53
923
brid stochastic deterministic approach (Skiborowski et al., 2015b) is also
924
under current investigation (Kruber et al., 2019). At last, an extension of
925
the considered process concepts, including concepts such as internally heat-
926
integrated distillation-columns (Harwardt and Marquardt, 2012) or combi-
927
nations of the different concepts (Jana, 2019), as well as a potential energy
928
integration with a background process will be explored as well.
929
Acknowledgement
930
This work was performed in the knowledge transfer project “Hybrid separa-
931
tion processes: Modeling and design of membrane-assisted distillation pro-
932
cesses”, which is part of the Collaborative Research Center on ”Integrated
933
Chemical Processes in Liquid Multiphase Systems”. Financial support by
934
the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) is gratefully acknowledged.
935
54
936
55
937
56
938
939
References
940
Agrawal, R., 2001. Separations: Perspective of a process developer/designer.
941
American Institute of Chemical Engineers. AIChE Journal 47 (5), 967.
942
Arlt, W., 2014. Azeotropic distillation. In: Gorak, A., Oluji´c, Z., G´orak,
943
A. (Eds.), Distillation: Equipment and Processes. Academic Press, pp.
944
247–259.
945
Bausa, J., Marquardt, W., 2000. Quick and reliable phase stability test in
946
vlle flash calculations by homotopy continuation. Computers & Chemical
947
Engineering 24 (11), 2447–2456.
948
Bessa, L. C., Batista, F. R., Meirelles, A. J., 2012. Double-effect integration
949
of multicomponent alcoholic distillation columns. Energy 45 (1), 603–612.
950
Biegler, L. T., Grossmann, I. E., Westerberg, A. W., 1997. Systematic meth-
57
951
ods for chemical process design. Prentice Hall, Old Tappan, NJ (United
952
States).
953
Blahuˇsiak, M., Kiss, A. A., Babic, K., Kersten, S. R., Bargeman, G., Schuur,
954
B., 2018. Insights into the selection and design of fluid separation processes.
955
Separation and Purification Technology 194, 301–318.
956
Brito, K. D., Cordeiro, G. M., Figueirˆedo, M. F., Vasconcelos, L., Brito,
957
R. P., 2016a. Economic evaluation of energy saving alternatives in extrac-
958
tive distillation process. Computers & Chemical Engineering 93, 185–196.
959
Brito, K. D., Cordeiro, G. M., Figueirˆedo, M. F., Vasconcelos, L. G., Brito,
960
R. P., 2016b. Economic evaluation of energy saving alternatives in extrac-
961
tive distillation process. Computers & Chemical Engineering 93, 185–196.
962
Br¨ uggemann, S., Marquardt, W., 2004. Shortcut methods for nonideal multi-
963
component distillation: 3. extractive distillation columns. AIChE Journal
964
50 (6), 1129–1149.
965
Cignitti, S., Rodriguez-Donis, I., Abildskov, J., You, X., Shcherbakova, N.,
966
Gerbaud, V., 2019. Camd for entrainer screening of extractive distillation
967
process based on new thermodynamic criteria. Chemical Engineering Re-
968
search and Design 147, 721–733.
969
Cui, F., Cui, C., Sun, J., 2018. Simultaneous optimization of heat-integrated
970
extractive distillation with a recycle feed using pseudo transient continua-
971
tion models. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
972
973
Douglas, J. M., 1985. A hierarchical decision procedure for process synthesis. AIChE Journal 31 (3), 353–362. 58
974
975
Economic Indicators, 2018. Chemical engineering plant cost index. Chemical Engineering 1, 64.
976
Franke, M. B., 2017. Design of dividing-wall columns by mixed-integer non-
977
linear programming optimization. Chemie-Ingenieur-Technik 89 (5), 582–
978
597.
979
Furzer, I. A., 1994. Synthesis of entrainers in heteroazeotropic distillation
980
systems. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 72 (2), 358–364.
981
Gani, R., Jim´enez-Gonz´alez, C., ten Kate, A., Crafts, P. A., Jones, M.,
982
Powell, L., Atherton, J. H., Cordiner, J. L., 2006. A modern approach to
983
solvent selection. Chemical Engineering 113 (3), 30–43.
984
Gerbaud, V., Rodriguez-Donis, I., 2014. Extractive distillation. In: Gorak,
985
A., Oluji´c, Z., G´orak, A. (Eds.), Distillation: Equipment and Processes.
986
Academic Press, pp. 201–245.
987
Gerbaud, V., Rodriguez-Donis, I., Hegely, L., Lang, P., Denes, F., You, X.,
988
2019. Review of extractive distillation. process design, operation, optimiza-
989
tion and control. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 229–271.
990
Gu, J., You, X., Tao, C., Li, J., 2019. Analysis of heat integration, inter-
991
mediate reboiler and vapor recompression for the extractive distillation of
992
ternary mixture with two binary azeotropes. Chemical Engineering and
993
Processing - Process Intensification 142, 107546.
994
995
Guthrie, K. M., 1969. Capital cost estimating. Chem. Eng. Technol. 76 (6), 114–142. 59
996
Harwardt, A., Marquardt, W., 2012. Heat-integrated distillation columns:
997
Vapor recompression or internal heat integration? AIChE Journal 58 (12),
998
3740–3750.
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
Jana, A. K., 2019. Performance analysis of a heat integrated column with heat pumping. Separation and Purification Technology 209, 18–25. Julka, V., Chiplunkar, M., O’Young, L., 2009. Selecting entrainers for azeotropic distillation. Chemical Engineering Progress 105 (3), 47–53. Kallrath, J., 2011. Polylithic modeling and solution approaches using algebraic modeling systems. Optimization Letters 5 (3), 453–466.
1005
Kiss, A. A., Flores Landaeta, S. J., Infante Ferreira, C. A., 2012. Towards
1006
energy efficient distillation technologies - making the right choice. Energy
1007
47 (1), 531–542.
1008
Kiss, A. A., Suszwalak, D. J., 2012. Enhanced bioethanol dehydration by
1009
extractive and azeotropic distillation in dividing-wall columns. Separation
1010
and Purification Technology 86, 70–78.
1011
Kister, H. Z., 1992. Distillation design. McGraw Hill, New York [u.a.].
1012
Knapp, J. P., Doherty, M. F., 1994. Minimum entrainer flows for extractive
1013
distillation: A bifurcation theoretic approach. AIChE Journal 40 (2), 243–
1014
268.
1015
Koeijer, G., Kjelstrup, S., 2000. Minimizing entropy production rate in binary
1016
tray distillation. International Journal of Applied Thermodynamics 3, 105–
1017
110. 60
1018
Kossack, S., Kraemer, K., Gani, R., Marquardt, W., 2008. A systematic
1019
synthesis framework for extractive distillation processes. Chemical Engi-
1020
neering Research and Design 86 (7), 781–792.
1021
Kraemer, K., Harwardt, A., Marquardt, W., 2009a. Design of heat-integrated
1022
distillation processes using shortcut methods and rigorous optimization.
1023
Computer Aided Chemical Engineering 27 (C), 993–998.
1024
Kraemer, K., Harwardt, A., Skiborowski, M., Mitra, S., Marquardt, W.,
1025
2011. Shortcut-based design of multicomponent heteroazeotropic distilla-
1026
tion. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 89 (8), 1168–1189.
1027
Kraemer, K., Kossack, S., Marquardt, W., 2009b. Efficient optimization-
1028
based design of distillation processes for homogeneous azeotropic mixtures.
1029
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 48 (14), 6749–6764.
1030
Kraemer, K., Marquardt, W., 2010. Continuous reformulation of minlp prob-
1031
lems. In: Diehl M., Glineur F., Jarlebring E., Michiels W. (Ed.), Recent
1032
Advances in Optimization and its Applications in Engineering. Springer,
1033
pp. 83–92.
1034
Kruber, K. F., Grueters, T., Skiborowski, M., 2019. Efficient design of in-
1035
tensified extractive distillation processes based on a hybrid optimization
1036
approach. In: 29th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process En-
1037
gineering. Vol. 46 of Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. Elsevier, pp.
1038
859–864.
1039
Kruber, K. F., Scheffczyk, J., Leonhard, K., Bardow, A., Skiborowski, M.,
1040
2018. A hierarchical approach for solvent selection based on successive 61
1041
model refinement. In: 28th European Symposium on Computer Aided
1042
Process Engineering. Vol. 43 of Computer Aided Chemical Engineering.
1043
Elsevier, pp. 325–330.
1044
Le, Q.-K., Halvorsen, I. J., Pajalic, O., Skogestad, S., 2015. Dividing wall
1045
columns for heterogeneous azeotropic distillation. Chemical Engineering
1046
Research and Design 99, 111–119.
1047
1048
1049
1050
Luyben, W. L., 2013. Distillation design and control using Aspen simulation. John Wiley & Sons. Mersmann, A., Kind, M., Stichlmair, J., 2011. Thermal separation technology: principles, methods, process design. Springer, New York.
1051
Raghunathan, A. U., Biegler, L. T., 2003. Mathematical programs with equi-
1052
librium constraints (mpecs) in process engineering. Computers & Chemical
1053
Engineering 27 (10), 1381–1392.
1054
Singh, A., Rangaiah, G. P., 2017. Review of technological advances in
1055
bioethanol recovery and dehydration. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry
1056
Research 56 (18), 5147–5163.
1057
Skiborowski, M., G´orak, A., 2016. Hybrid separation processes. In: Lutze,
1058
P., G´orak, A. (Eds.), Reactive and Membrane-Assisted Separations. De
1059
Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, pp. 37–110.
1060
Skiborowski, M., Harwardt, A., Marquardt, W., 2013. Conceptual design of
1061
distillation-based hybrid separation processes. Annual Review of Chemical
1062
and Biomolecular Engineering 4, 45–68. 62
1063
Skiborowski,
M.,
Harwardt,
A.,
Marquardt,
W.,
2015a. Efficient
1064
optimization-based design for the separation of heterogeneous azeotropic
1065
mixtures. Computers & Chemical Engineering 72, 34–51.
1066
Skiborowski, M., Rautenberg, M., Marquardt, W., 2015b. A hybrid
1067
evolutionary-deterministic optimization approach for conceptual design.
1068
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 54 (41), 10054–10072.
1069
Skiborowski, M., Recker, S., Marquardt, W., 2018. Shortcut-based optimiza-
1070
tion of distillation-based processes by a novel reformulation of the feed
1071
angle method. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 132, 135–148.
1072
Skiborowski, M., Wessel, J., Marquardt, W., 2014. Efficient optimization-
1073
based design of membrane-assisted distillation processes. Industrial & En-
1074
gineering Chemistry Research 53 (40), 15698–15717.
1075
Stichlmair, J. G., Herguijuela, J.-R., 1992. Separation regions and processes
1076
of zeotropic and azeotropic ternary distillation. AIChE Journal 38 (10),
1077
1523–1535.
1078
Tututi-Avila, S., Jim´enez-Guti´errez, A., Hahn, J., 2014. Control analysis of
1079
an extractive dividing-wall column used for ethanol dehydration. Chemical
1080
Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 82, 88–100.
1081
Urdaneta, R. Y., Bausa, J., Br¨ uggemann, S., Marquardt, W., 2002. Analysis
1082
and conceptual design of ternary heterogeneous azeotropic distillation pro-
1083
cesses. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 41 (16), 3849–3866.
1084
Viswanathan, J., Grossmann, I. E., 1993. Optimal feed locations and number 63
1085
of trays for distillation columns with multiple feeds. Industrial & Engineer-
1086
ing Chemistry Research 32 (11), 2942–2949.
1087
Wahnschafft, O. M., Westerberg, A. W., 1993. The product composition re-
1088
gions of azeotropic distillation columns. 2. separability in two-feed columns
1089
and entrainer selection. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
1090
32 (6), 1108–1120.
1091
Waltermann, T., Muenchrath, D., Skiborowski, M., 2017. Efficient
1092
optimization-based design of energy-intensified azeotropic distillation pro-
1093
cesses. In: 27th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engi-
1094
neering. Vol. 40 of Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. Elsevier, pp.
1095
1045–1050.
1096
Waltermann, T., Skiborowski, M., 2016. Efficient optimization-based design
1097
of energetically intensified distillation processes. In: 26th European Sym-
1098
posium on Computer Aided Process Engineering. Vol. 38 of Computer
1099
Aided Chemical Engineering. Elsevier, pp. 571–576.
1100
Waltermann, T., Skiborowski, M., 2019. Efficient optimization-based design
1101
of energy-integrated distillation processes. Computers & Chemical Engi-
1102
neering 129, 106520.
1103
Wang, C., Wang, C., Guang, C., Zhang, Z., 2018. Comparison of extrac-
1104
tive distillation separation sequences for acetonitrile/methanol/benzene
1105
multi-azeotropic mixtures. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnol-
1106
ogy 93 (11), 3302–3316.
64
1107
Wang, H., Cui, X., Li, C., Fang, J., 2013. Separation of ethyl acetate-
1108
dichloromethane-ethanol by extractive distillation: Simulation and opti-
1109
mization. Chemical Engineering & Technology 36 (4), 627–634.
1110
Wasylkiewicz, S. K., Kobylka, L. C., Castillo, F. J., 2003. Synthesis and
1111
design of heterogeneous separation systems with recycle streams. Chemical
1112
Engineering Journal 92 (1-3), 201–208.
1113
1114
Widagdo, S., Seider, W. D., 1996. Journal review. azeotropic distillation. AIChE Journal 42 (1), 96–130.
1115
Wu, Y. C., Hsu, P. H.-C., Chien, I.-L., 2013. Critical assessment of the
1116
energy-saving potential of an extractive dividing-wall column. Industrial
1117
and Engineering Chemistry Research 52 (15), 5384–5399.
1118
Wu, Y. C., Lee, H.-Y., Huang, H.-P., Chien, I.-L., 2014. Energy-saving
1119
dividing-wall column design and control for heterogeneous azeotropic dis-
1120
tillation systems. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 53 (4),
1121
1537–1552.
1122
Yang, Z., Zhao, X., Li, C., Fang, J., 10 2012. Computer aided design for
1123
entrainer in heteroazeotropic distillation by combining group contribution
1124
method with graph principle. Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal 63, 3158–
1125
3164.
1126
You, X., Rodriguez-Donis, I., Gerbaud, V., 2016. Reducing process cost and
1127
co2 emissions for extractive distillation by double-effect heat integration
1128
and mechanical heat pump. Applied Energy 166, 128–140.
65
1129
Zhou, T., Song, Z., Zhang, X., Gani, R., Sundmacher, K., 2019. Opti-
1130
mal solvent design for extractive distillation processes: A multiobjec-
1131
tive optimization-based hierarchical framework. Industrial and Engineering
1132
Chemistry Research 58 (15), 5777–5786.
1133
Zhu, Z., Xu, D., Liu, X., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., 2016. Separation of acetoni-
1134
trile/methanol/benzene ternary azeotrope via triple column pressure-swing
1135
distillation. Separation and Purification Technology 169, 66–77.
66
1136
Conflict of Interest
1137
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests
1138
or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work
1139
reported in this paper.
67
1140
Author Contribution
1141
Thomas Waltermann: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Investi-
1142
gation, Visualization, Writing Original Draft. Tamara Grueters: Method-
1143
ology, Software. Daniel Muenchrath: Methodology, Software. Mirko
1144
Skiborowski: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Project ad-
1145
ministration, Writing Review & Editing.
68