Fabrication of graphene oxide composite membranes and their application for pervaporation dehydration of butanol Xianfu Chen, Gongping Liu, Yiqun Fan Hanyu Zhang PII: DOI: Reference:
S1004-9541(15)00150-0 doi: 10.1016/j.cjche.2015.04.018 CJCHE 288
To appear in: Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
18 November 2014 10 March 2015 18 March 2015
Please cite this article as: Xianfu Chen, Gongping Liu, Yiqun Fan Hanyu Zhang, Fabrication of graphene oxide composite membranes and their application for pervaporation dehydration of butanol, (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.cjche.2015.04.018
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Separation Science and Engineering Fabrication of graphene oxide composite membranes and their application for pervaporation dehydration of butanol* Gongping Liu (刘公平), Hanyu Zhang(张晗宇) ,Yiqun Fan (范益群)**
T
Xianfu Chen (陈献富),
SC R
Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, China
IP
Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Chemical
Abstract As a new kind of 2D nano materials, graphene oxide (GO) with 2-4 layers was fabricated via a modified Hummers method and used for the preparation of pervaporation (PV) membranes.
NU
Such GO membranes were prepared via a facile vacuum-assisted method on anodic aluminium oxide disks and applied for the dehydration of butanol. To obtain GO membranes with high performance, effects of pre-treatments, including high-speed centrifugal treatment of GO dispersion and thermal
MA
treatment of GO membranes, were investigated. In addition, effects of operation conditions on the performance of GO membranes in the PV process and the stability of GO membranes were also studied. It is benefit to improve the selectivity of GO membrane by pre-treatment that centrifuge the
D
GO dispersion with 10000 r·min-1 for 40 min, which could purify the GO dispersion by removing the
TE
large size GO sheets. As prepared GO membrane showed high separation performance for the butanol/water system. The separation factor was 230, and the permeability was as high as 3.1
CE P
kg∙m-2∙h-1 when the PV temperature was 50 oC and the water content in feed was 10%(by mass). Meanwhile, the membrane still showed good stability for the dehydration of butanol after running for 1800 min in the PV process. GO membranes are suitable candidates for butanol dehydration via PV
AC
process.
Keywords graphene oxide, membrane, pervaporation, dehydration, butanol
1 INTRODUCTION Recent advances in the synthesis and characterization of graphene-based 2D nano materials have brought new ideas for the design and fabrication of membranes with special structures as well as increased permeability, selectivity and resistance to fouling[1, 2]. As an important derivative and intermediate of graphene, graphene oxide Received 2014-11-18, revised 2015-3-10, accepted 2015-3-18. * Supported by the National High Technical Research Program of China (2012AA03A606), the Project of Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (12KJA530001) and the Innovative Research Team Program by the Ministry of Education of China (IRT13070). ** Corresponding author. E-mail address:
[email protected] 1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (GO) does not only have a lot of characters of graphene, but also amount directions to improve because of abundant oxygenic functional groups existed on the surface of graphene oxide[3-6]. GO could be synthesized facilely from natural graphite using
T
oxidants including concentrated sulfuric acid, nitric acid and potassium permanganate
IP
based on Hummers method[7].
SC R
A lot of works have been carried out to obtain high performance membranes by combining GO and common polymeric materials[8-12]. Besides, membranes made with pure GO were also reported, which exhibited a lot of special properties for
NU
separation due to their 2D channels[5, 13-15], hydrophilic surface[10, 16, 17] as well as the defects on GO sheets[18-20]. Among the special properties of GO membranes,
MA
the priority permeability for water attracted a lot of interests. It was found that GO sheets bear hydroxyl, epoxy, and other hydrophilic functional groups on their openings
D
and edges. Combined with the layered structure formed by GO laminates, these
TE
hydrophilic functional groups made GO membranes even completely impermeable to liquids, vapours, and gases, including helium, but allow unimpeded permeation of
CE P
water[16]. Similar GO membranes could be fabricated for the dehydration of organic solvents due to the high selectivity of water[21-25]. In the preparation process of such GO membranes, a series of facile membrane
AC
formation methods were employed including spin-coating method[13], dip-coating method[25], self-assemble method[6, 26] and different types of filtration methods[21, 24]. Meanwhile, various preparation conditions, such as salt concentration, pH value[27] and pressure[24], were investigated. However, GO materials made from different raw graphite via different chemical oxidation routes are different in C/O ratio, particle size and shape[28]. Even in one pot, synthesized GO sheets could be much different, especially in particle size. Hence, pre-treatment and purification of GO dispersion are very necessary. In addition, the functional groups and d-spacing of GO sheets are sensitive to water and temperature[16]. Thus, GO membranes should be thermal treated under suitable conditions before application. As an important kind of biofuels, butanol exhibits a huge potential to be the 2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT alternative of fossil energy. Membrane process is a high efficiency and low cost technique for the purification of butanol[29]. To date, both organic and inorganic materials have been used to fabricate membranes for the dehydration of butanol in
T
pervaporation (PV) processes. Organic membranes were easy to be fabricated and
IP
showed high selectivity to water[30, 31], but their permeabilities were generally below
SC R
2 kg∙m-2∙h-1. Inorganic membranes performed higher permeabilities[32-34], which usually in the range of 2-10 kg∙m-2∙h-1. An ideal membrane should combine the high performance of inorganic membrane and easy fabrication of organic membrane.
NU
However, to access such a membrane is still a big challenge we are facing[35]. On this sight, GO membrane might be a promising one for butanol dehydration. However,
MA
seldom literature about such GO membranes for the dehydration of butanol was reported.
D
Here, we designed and fabricated GO membranes supported by ceramic substrates
TE
also via a simple vacuum-assisted filtration method, and applied these membranes for butanol dehydration in PV process. Effects of pre-treatments, including high-speed
CE P
centrifugal treatment of GO dispersion and thermal treatment of GO membranes, were investigated. Besides, effects of operation conditions on the performance of GO
AC
membranes in the PV process and the stability of GO membranes were also studied.
2 EXPERIMENTAL 2.1 Materials Fine grade synthetic graphite flakes of about 30 μm was supplied by Jinrilai Graphite Inc. (Qingdao, China) and used as received. Sulfuric acid [H2SO4, 97%(by mass)], hydrochloric acid [HCl, 10 %(by mass) in water], hydrogen peroxide [H2O2, 30 % (by mass)in water] and Potassium permanganate (KMnO4) from Sinopharm Co. (Shanghai, China) were also used as received. Anodic aluminium oxide (AAO) macroporous membranes with an average pore size of 100 nm and a thickness of 50 μm from Merck Millipore Co. (USA) were used as substrates for GO membranes.
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2.2 Preparation of graphene oxide Modified Hummers method was used to prepare GO from graphite[36]. 50 ml sulfuric acid was added to 2 g graphite powder and the temperature of the dispersion
T
was maintained at about 7 oC and stirred for 30 min. Then the dispersion was heated to
IP
20 oC and stirred for 60 min. Subsequently, 7 g KMnO4 was added in 4 times every 30
SC R
min. At this time, the dispersion changed in color from black to dark green. Then the dispersion was heated to 35 oC and stirred for 120 min. After 100 ml deionized water was added, the dispersion was heated to 98 oC and stirred for 5 min. The oxidation
NU
reaction was terminated by adding 200 ml deionized water. The dispersion turned brown in color. To remove the excess oxidant, 5 ml 30%(by mass) hydrogen peroxide
MA
dispersion was added, and the dispersion was stirred for 30 min. At this time, a dispersion with light yellow was obtained. Synthesized GO was separated and washed
D
with 100 ml 10 wt.% hydrochloric acid for five times in a Buchner funnel. Filtered GO
TE
cakes were redispersed in pure water and filtered and washed several times until no sulfate ions could be detected by the precipitation method with 0.02 mol·L-1 barium
CE P
chloride solution. Filtered GO cakes were redispersed in pure water again with the assist of ultrasonic wave for 60 min. The sonication power and frequency were
AC
controlled at 450 W and 20 kHz, respectively. Then, the dispersed GO dispersion was centrifuged at 3000 r·min-1 for 5 min to remove the graphite oxide particles. The purified GO dispersion was dried by a freeze drying method.
2.3 Fabrication of GO membranes 50 mg GO was dispersed in 200 ml water by an ultrasonic assisted method to form a homogeneous GO dispersion. To purify the GO dispersion, we designed a high-speed centrifugal pre-treatment to remove large size GO sheets. GO dispersion containing 250×10-6 GO was centrifugal pre-treated at a high rotate speed of 10000 r·min-1 for several times with 10 min each time. After each time of centrifugal treatment, the precipitation was removed from GO dispersion carefully. Then, the purified GO dispersion was diluted to 50×10-6. AAO microfiltration membranes were used as substrates for GO membranes. To 4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT improve the strength of AAO membranes, they were supported by macroporous ceramic disks (ϕ 40 mm × 2.5 mm) and sealed by a solvent resistant binder. GO membranes were prepared on the enhanced AAO substrates by a vacuum assisted filter
T
method. The thickness of membrane was controlled by adjusting the volume of added
IP
GO dispersion. Until no liquid could be observed on the surface of fresh GO membrane,
SC R
the vacuum conditions were kept for two more hours to remove the excess water in GO membrane. As prepared fresh GO membranes were dried at given temperatures for 12 h
2.4 Characterization techniques
NU
to remove the residual water.
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of GO was measured using an Nicolet
MA
8700 infrared microspectrometer (Thermo, USA) in the range of 4000-1000 cm-1. Raman spectra (LabRAM HR 800, Horiba, France) were recorded using an excitation
D
wavelength of 514 nm (2.41 eV). An X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (Miniflex 600,
TE
Rigaku, Japan) was used to measure the interlayer with focused monochromatized Cu-Kα radiation at a wavelength of 0.15418 nm, operating in the 2θ range of 5 o -50
o
CE P
at a scan rate of 20 (o)∙min-1. The average d-spacing value was calculated using Bragg`s law from the X-ray scattering data. Thermogravimetry (TG) analyses were performed in a STA 449F3 instrument (NETZSCH, Germany), heating the sample to 500 °C at a
AC
rate of 10 °C∙min-1 under a 100 ml∙min-1 air flow. The particle size distribution of the GO was characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS, Microtrac, Zetatrac, USA). FESEM (S-4800, Hitachi, Japan), TEM (JEOL 1011, JEOL, Japan) and AFM (XE-100, Park, Korea) were employed to characterize the microtopographies of samples. Contact angle between water and the surface of membrane was measured by a contact angle apparatus (A-100p, DropMeter, China). Pervaporation process for the dehydration of butanol was carried out on the device showed in the Fig. 1. The device contained five major parts including stock tank, membrane module, temperature controller, cold trap and vacuum system. The pressure of permeate side was controlled below 100 Pa, and the feed temperature was controlled at a various values from 30 to 90 oC with a deviation below 1 oC。The flux (F) was 5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT determined by using the following equation: F
Q A t
(1)
T
where Q is the mass of permeate; A is the effective membrane area and t is the time
IP
interval of sample collection. Gas Chromatograph (GC, GC2014, Shimadzu, Japan)
SC R
was used to analyze the contents of water in butanol. The separation factor of water and butanol was calculated using the standard equation: Ywater / Ybutanol X water / X butanol
(2)
NU
where X and Y are the weight fractions of species in the feed and permeate, respectively.
MA
The pervaporation separation index (PSI) was calculated using the following equation [37]:
PSI F ( 1)
(3)
AC
CE P
TE
D
where F is the flux, and α is the separation factor
Figure 1 PV set for the dehydration of butanol
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Characterizations of graphene oxide GO was characterized by FTIR spectroscopy. As shown in Fig. 2, a lot of hydrophilic functional groups were observed. Such functional groups have excellent water-absorbing capacity and play important roles in water transfer process in GO membranes. The peaks at around 3430 cm-1 and 1635 cm-1 refer to the -OH groups of absorbed water in GO. The peaks at 2930 cm-1 and 2850 cm-1 are attributed to -CH2groups on GO sheets. The peak at 1720 cm-1 corresponds to C=O groups from carbonyl
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT or conjugated carbonyl groups. The peaks at 1380 cm-1, 1264 cm-1 and 1110 cm-1 are due to the -OH groups from carboxyl, C-O-C groups from epoxy of ether, and C-O groups from alkoxy, respectively. These results agree well with the reports in
T
literature[38, 39]. In contrast, the peaks of -OH and C-O-C groups almost disappeared
MA
NU
SC R
IP
for reduced GO.
TE
D
Figure 2 FTIR spectrum of GO and reduced GO
To further study the structural properties of the GO powder, Raman spectroscopy
CE P
was employed. As shown in Fig. 3, G band at 1585 cm-1 and D band at 1338 cm-1 were observed clearly, which are assigned to the graphitized structure and local defects or
AC
disorders located at the edges of graphene, respectively[5, 18].
Figure 3 Raman spectrum of GO
The GO gel was prepared from GO dispersion (2 mg·ml-1) via a
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT filtration concentration process for TG analyses. The results are showed in Fig 4. It could be found that GO gel contained three types of water including free water, trapped water and bounded water[40, 41]. Free water behaves like normal water
IP
T
without any restraint, which could be removed mostly before 100 oC corresponding to a mass loss of 45 %; Trapped water is confined in GO sheets and encounters arbitrary
SC R
constrains while retaining translational mobility, which were almost removed by further increasing the temperature to 240 oC. This process corresponded to a mass loss of 29 %. Bound water is tightly bound to GO by different bonds allowing only local motions,
NU
which was also be partly removed above 240 oC corresponding to a small mass loss of 1 %. Comparing with the free water and the trapped water, the mass lose was much
MA
smaller for the decomposed of functional groups on GO sheets. There are two main reasons for the small weight loss ratio at 240 oC. First, the GO gel contains a lot of free
D
water and trapped water due to the good hydrophilicity of GO sheets. Second, only the
TE
C-O (hydroxyls and epoxides) groups were decomposed at around 240 oC, whereas the
AC
CE P
C=O and COOH components even did not change [42].
Figure 4 TG-DSC curve of GO gel
XRD spectra of GO and graphite are showed in Fig. 5. It could be found that the 2 theta degree of the sharp peak for GO was much smaller than that of graphite. This was due to the oxidation process in which the introduction of functional groups enlarged the d-spacing of GO sheets. According to the Bragg equation[43], the d-spacing was calculated to be 0.343 nm and 0.885 nm for graphite and GO, respectively. The
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
NU
SC R
IP
T
enlarged d-spacing made it possible for molecules transfer in GO membranes.
MA
Figure 5 XRD spectra of GO and graphite.
The morphologies of GO sheets are showed in Fig. 6, in which Fig. 6(a) and Fig.
D
6(b) are TEM images of GO sheets. From Fig. 6(a), we can clearly observe the
TE
corrugated surface of GO. Fig. 6(b) shows the edges of GO sheets. It could be found that the GO sheets were of 2-4 layers. AFM image [Fig. 6(c)] indicates that as-prepared
CE P
GO sheets is about 3.6 nm in thick and 1-3 μm in length and width. These results indicate that as-prepared GO sheets were a kind of proper 2D materials. Such 2D structure is benefit for the fabrication of ultrathin GO membranes and the improvement
AC
of permeability [18, 35].
Figure 6 (a) and (b) TEM micrographs of GO sheets, (c) AFM micrograph of GO sheets.
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3.2 Effect of pre-treatment of GO dispersion on the properties of GO membranes
T
GO dispersion containing 250 ppm GO was centrifugal pre-treated at a high rotate
IP
speed of 10000 r·min-1 for 10 min each time. After each time of centrifugal treatment, the precipitation was removed from GO dispersion carefully. The concentration of GO
SC R
was measured by an UV-vis spectroscopy. From the UV-vis absorption spectrum of GO dispersions (Fig. 7, right), it could be found that the curves were smooth and the
NU
absorbance values were relatively high at the wave length of 400 nm. Hence, the absorbance at 400 nm was applied for the measurement of concentration of GO
MA
dispersions. The correlationship between the absorbances of GO dispersions at a wave length of 400 nm and the times of pre-treatment was also showed in Fig 7 (upper). It could be clearly observed that the absorbance decreased with the increase of
D
pre-treatment times. At the beginning 30 min, a significantly decrease of the
TE
absorbance could be observed. While, a slight decline was contributed by the further pre-treatment after 40 min. In addition, some precipitates could be observed clearly at
CE P
the first 10 min from the photos of GO dispersions in Fig. 7 (left). While, only little precipitation was found after 4 times of centrifugal treatment. This result suggests that
AC
most GO sheets with large size or multi-layer could be removed by centrifugal pre-treated for 3-4 times. The particle size distributions of GO dispersions before and after 40 min
centrifugal treatment are showed in Fig. 8. It could be found that GO sheets with particle size of 4-6 μm had been removed from the dispersion after the high-speed centrifugal treatment. While the centrifugal treatment made slight difference for the GO sheets with particle size of 200-400 nm. By the way, the particle size distribution determined by DLS here is a qualitative analysis but not a quantitative analysis. Here, 40 min was applied for the centrifugal treatment of the GO dispersions.
10
SC R
IP
T
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
Figure 7 UV-vis absorption spectrum of GO dispersions (right), photos of GO dispersions (left) and effect of centrifuge time on the absorbances of GO dispersions (upper)
AC
Figure 8 Effect of centrifugal treatment on the particle size distributions of GO dispersions
The purified GO dispersion was diluted and used for the preparation of GO
membranes. As-prepared GO membranes were thermal treated at 60 oC for 12 h and then applied for the dehydration of butanol in PV process. When the water mass content in feed was 10% and the PV temperature was 50 oC, the performance of GO membranes derived from GO dispersions before and after centrifugal treatment were tested and showed in Fig. 9. It could be found that after the centrifugal treatment, the separation factor of GO membrane for water and butanol was improved to 230, which was almost 7 times than that of GO membrane without pre-treatment. While the permeate decreased from 5 kg∙m-2∙h-1 to 3.1 kg∙m-2∙h-1 only with a ratio of 38 %. This was likely due to the reason that an uniform d-spacing between GO sheets could be
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC R
IP
T
obtained by removing the large size GO sheets.
NU
Figure 9 Effect of centrifugal treatment on the performance of GO membranes
MA
3.3 Effect of thermal treatment temperature on the contact angle of GO membranes
D
The correlation of contact angle (CA) with thermal treatment temperature is
TE
showed in Fig. 10. The CA increased with the thermal treatment temperature. When the temperature increased from 30 oC to 60 oC, CA of GO membrane increased from 10 o to
CE P
70 o. In contrast, the CA was almost constant when the temperature various from 60 oC to 90 oC. Combining with the results of TG analyses, it could be explained by two reasons. One reason is that both the free water and trapped water between GO sheets
AC
escaped further when the thermal treatment temperature increased. With the lose of water, the d-spacing of GO sheets decreased and lead to a increased resistance for the permeation of water in GO membrane. The other reason is that the bonded water could also be removed at a high temperature and the hydrophilic groups were destroyed, which could weaken the water-absorbing ability of GO. As a result, the GO color turned from light yellow to black after being thermal treated at 90 oC for 12 h. With respect to prevent the excessive dehydration of GO and the destroy of hydrophilic groups, the thermal treatment should be controlled below 60 oC. Hence, 60 oC was chosen as the thermal treatment temperature.
12
SC R
IP
T
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
NU
Figure 10 Effect of thermal treatment temperature on the contact angle of GO membranes, and appearance of GO membranes thermal treated at 30 oC (left) and 90 oC (right) for 12 h
GO membranes treated and untreated at 60 oC for 12 h were tested in PV
MA
processes at 50 oC, 60 oC and 70 oC, respectively. Then, the GO membranes were immersed in their corresponding feeds at the initial PV temperature for 24 h.
D
Subsequently, the PV performances of these GO membranes were tested again to
TE
estimate the stabilities of GO membranes. The details in change are showed in Fig. 11. It could be found that thermal treated GO membranes showed smaller change ratios in
CE P
permeabilities and separation factors than that of GO membranes without thermal treatment. It indicates the stabilities of GO membranes were improved by the thermal
AC
treatment at 60 oC for 12 h. This is likely due to that the interaction force between GO sheets was enhanced by the remove of trapped water in GO during the thermal treatment process. Hence, all the GO membranes used below were thermal treated at 60 o
C for 12 h. Additionally, the activation energy values for permeation were calculated by using
Arrhenius equation[38]. When the water mass content in feed was 10%, the calculated apparent activation energies of water and butanol permeation were 11.3 and 21.9 kJ·mol-1, respectively. It means that the permeation of butanol through the membrane is more temperature-sensitive than water.
13
SC R
IP
T
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 11 Effect of thermal treatment on the stability of GO membranes
NU
3.4 Effect of water content in feed on the properties of GO membrane Controlling the PV temperature at 50 oC, the effects of water content in feed on the
MA
properties of GO membranes prepared form centrifugal treated GO dispersion were studied. As shown in Fig. 12, the permeate increased with the increase of water content
D
in feed. Meanwhile, the separation factor for water and butanol came down with the
TE
increase of water content. When the water mass content in feed was 4.8%, the separation factor was 440 and the permeate was 1.3 kg∙m-2∙h-1. On the contrary, the
CE P
separation factor came down to 124 and the permeate increased to 5.9 kg∙m-2∙h-1 when the water mass content in the feed increased to 16.7%. This might due to the change in
AC
d-spacing with the increase of water content in feed.
Figure 12 Effect of water content in feed on the performance of GO membrane
14
SC R
IP
T
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
NU
Figure 13 XRD patterns of GO membranes soaked in butanol solution with various water contents
In addition, we measured the d-spacing of GO membranes soaked in different
MA
butanol solutions with various water contents by using XRD[44]. Samples of GO membrane supported by AAO were loaded into different butanol solutions at ambient
D
temperature for 6 h and examined with XRD. The water mass contents of butanol were
TE
controlled at 5%, 10% and 20%, respectively. As shown in Fig. 13, a significant shift in the (001) reflection with the increase of water content was observed, which corresponds
CE P
to an increase in d-spacing. According to the Bragg equation[43], the d-spacing was calculated and showed in Fig 13. For GO membrane soaked in butanol solution with 20 % water mass content, the d-spacing was 1.473 nm, which is 1.7 times larger than
AC
that of dry GO membrane (0.885 nm). This results suggest that the d-spacing between GO sheets is sensitive to the water content in the feed, which are in good accordance with literature[16]. The higher water content means the larger d-spacing, which was benefit for the transfer of water in graphene membrane. Contrarily, the larger d-spacing means the more butanol molecules could pass through the GO membrane. As a result, the separation factor decreased and the permeate increased with the increase of water content in feed. The optical and FESEM images of GO membrane are showed in Fig 14. Optical images of AAO disk and AAO supported GO membrane [Fig. 14(a)] show that both the AAO disk and GO membrane were so thin. We could easily distinguish the characters behind them by naked eyes. The surface morphologies of the GO membrane 15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT characterized by FESEM and AFM are presented in Fig. 14(b) and Fig. 14(c), respectively. It could be found that all the pores on the surface of AAO were completely covered by GO sheets and formed a lot of wrinkles. This indicates that a
T
defect-free GO separation layer was formed on the top of AAO substrate. The
IP
cross-section of supported GO membrane is showed in Fig. 14(d). Cylindrical pore
SC R
structure of AAO substrate and layered structure of GO membrane could be clearly observed. The thickness of GO membrane with a value of 600 nm could also be
TE
D
MA
NU
obtained.
CE P
Figure 14 (a) Optical images of AAO disk (left) and AAO supported GO membrane (right), (b) FESEM micrograph of GO membrane, (c) AFM image of the surface morphology of GO membrane, (d) FESEM image of the cross-sectional morphology of GO membrane
The performance of various membranes reported in literature and the GO membranes we prepared for the dehydration of butanol via PV are listed in Table 1.
AC
Comparing with organic membranes, it could be found that the GO membranes we prepared for butanol dehydration showed high flux at a relatively low PV temperature. Although the separation factor of such GO membranes should be further improved, the water content in permeate was up 95%. It indicates that the GO membranes we prepared showed a relatively high efficiency for the dehydration of butanol via PV. Comparing with inorganic membranes, the fluxes of GO membranes we prepared were at a similar magnitude. While, a further improvement in separation factor should be carried out for our GO membranes. However, considering the cheap raw materials (graphite) and facile membrane formation process, GO shows a good potential to be one kind of low-cost membrane materials. Additionally, a relatively low PV temperature we applied also means a low cost for the process of butanol dehydration. In 16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT general, the GO PV membranes we prepared are suitable candidates for butanol dehydration processes.
MA
NU
SC R
IP
T
Table 1 PV performance of various membranes for butanol dehydration Feed Water mass water Flux Temp. content in Type of membranes mass /g·m-2·h /oC permeate -1 content /% /% PVA-CS/ceramic [31] 10 70 99.1 1100 Matrimid HF [45] 15 60 94.1-98.9 630-965 PI/PEI dual-layer HF [46] 15 60 99.5 846 PAA/polyethyleneimine [47] 5 50 96.2 769 ZIF-8/PBI [48] 15 60 99.8 81 TR-PBO [49] 10 80 97.7 58 CS [50] 4 30 99.1 210 NaA (SMART Chemical 9.2 60 99.9 1600 Company Ltd.) [51] 0.5 60 72.3 250 tubular silica [33] 5 70 96.9 4500 GO/AAO (our work) 10 50 96.2 3100 GO/AAO (our work) 4.7 50 95.6 1300
Separation factor 1000 91-491 1174 481 3417 390 2657 16107 520 600 230 440
TE
D
The stability of GO membranes were measured at the PV temperature of 50 oC and with the water mass content in feed of 10%. As shown in Fig. 15, the separation factor
CE P
of water and butanol was stable at the value up 200 and the permeate was almost at a constant value of 3.1 kg·m-2·h-1. The PSI was calculated to 710 kg·m-2·h-1. The GO
AC
membrane still showed a good and stable performance after running for 1800 min.
Figure 15 The stability of GO membrane
5 CONCLUSIONS GO sheets with 2-4 layers and a typical 2D structure were prepared via a modified
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Hummers method. A lot of hydrophilic groups was detected on the surface and the edge of GO sheets. As-prepared GO dispersion was used to prepare GO membrane on the surface of ceramic microfiltration substrate via a facile vacuum-assisted filter method.
T
Such supported GO membrane without any detected defects showed a good
IP
performance for the dehydration of butanol via a PV process. A centrifugal
SC R
per-treatment at 10000 r·min-1 for 40 min could remove the large size GO sheets efficiently and improve the separation properties. The water content in feed could influence the d-spacing of GO sheets and affect the performance of GO membrane. The
NU
GO membrane showed a high permeate of 3.1 kg·m-2·h-1 and a separation factor of 230 at the conditions with a PV temperature of 50 oC and a feed water content of 10%(by
MA
mass). After running for 1800 min, the GO membrane still showed a good stability for the dehydration of butanol in the PV process. Such GO membranes are potential
TE
D
candidates for the dehydration of butanol.
REFERENCES
CE P
1 Kim, J., Cote, L.J., Huang, J.X., “Two dimensional soft material: new faces of graphene oxide”, Acc. Chem. Res., 45(8), 1356-1364 (2012). 2 Mi, B.X., “Graphene oxide membranes for ionic and molecular sieving”, Science, 343(6172), 740-742 (2014).
AC
3 Zarrin, H., Higgins, D., Jun, Y., Chen, Z.W., Fowler, M., “Functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposite membrane for low humidity and high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells”, J. Phys. Chem. C, 115(42), 20774-20781 (2011). 4 Liu, H.Y., Xi, P.X., Xie, G.Q., Shi, Y.J., Hou, F.P., Huang, L., Chen, F.J., Zeng, Z.Z., Shao, C.W., Wang, J., “Simultaneous reduction and surface functionalization of graphene oxide for hydroxyapatite mineralization”, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116(5), 3334-3341 (2012). 5 Hu, M., Mi, B.X., “Enabling graphene oxide nanosheets as water separation membranes”, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47(8), 3715-3723 (2013). 6 Choi, W., Choi, J., Bang, J., Lee, J.H., “Layer-by-layer assembly of graphene oxide nanosheets on polyamide membranes for durable reverse-osmosis applications”, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter., 5(23), 12510-12519 (2013). 7 Singh, V., Joung, D., Zhai, L., Das, S., Khondaker, S.I., Seal, S., “Graphene based materials: Past, present and future”, Prog. Mater Sci., 56(8), 1178-1271 (2011). 8 Wang, N.X., Ji, S.L., Zhang, G.J., Li, J., Wang, L., “Self-assembly of graphene oxide 18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and polyelectrolyte complex nanohybrid membranes for nanofiltration and pervaporation”, Chem. Eng. J., 213, 318-329 (2012). 9 Hu, K., Gupta, M.K., Kulkarni, D.D., Tsukruk, V.V., “Ultra-Robust Graphene Oxide-Silk Fibroin Nanocomposite Membranes”, Adv. Mater., 25(16), 2301-2307
T
(2013).
IP
10 Ganesh, B.M., Isloor, A.M., Ismail, A.F., “Enhanced hydrophilicity and salt rejection study of graphene oxide-polysulfone mixed matrix membrane”,
SC R
Desalination, 313, 199-207 (2013).
11 Choi, B.G., Huh, Y.S., Park, Y.C., Jung, D.H., Hong, W.H., Park, H., “Enhanced transport properties in polymer electrolyte composite membranes with graphene oxide sheets”, Carbon, 50(15), 5395-5402 (2012).
property
of
polysulfone
NU
12 Zhao, H.Y., Wu, L.G., Zhou, Z.J., Zhang, L., Chen, H.L., “Improving the antifouling ultrafiltration
membrane
by
incorporation
of
MA
isocyanate-treated graphene oxide”, PCCP, 15(23), 9084-9092 (2013). 13 Kim, H.W., Yoon, H.W., Yoon, S.M., Yoo, B.M., Ahn, B.K., Cho, Y.H., Shin, H.J., Yang, H., Paik, U., Kwon, S., Choi, J.Y., Park, H.B., “Selective gas transport through
D
few-layered graphene and graphene oxide membranes”, Science, 342(6154), 91-95 (2013).
TE
14 Boukhvalov, D.W., Katsnelson, M.I., Son, Y.W., “Origin of anomalous water
(2013).
CE P
permeation through graphene oxide membrane”, Nano Lett., 13(8), 3930-3935
15 Huang, H., Song, Z., Wei, N., Shi, L., Mao, Y., Ying, Y., Sun, L., Xu, Z., Peng, X., “Ultrafast viscous water flow through nanostrand-channelled graphene oxide membranes”, Nat. Commun., 4, 2979-2987 (2013).
AC
16 Nair, R.R., Wu, H.A., Jayaram, P.N., Grigorieva, I.V., Geim, A.K., “Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak-tight graphene-based membranes”, Science, 335(6067), 442-444 (2012). 17 Lee, J., Chae, H.R., Won, Y.J., Lee, K., Lee, C.H., Lee, H.H., Kim, I.C., Lee, J.M., “Graphene oxide nanoplatelets composite membrane with hydrophilic and antifouling properties for wastewater treatment”, J. Membr. Sci., 448, 223-230 (2013). 18 Li, H., Song, Z., Zhang, X., Huang, Y., Li, S., Mao, Y., Ploehn, H.J., Bao, Y., Yu, M., “Ultrathin, molecular-sieving graphene oxide membranes for selective hydrogen separation”, Science, 342(6154), 95-98 (2013). 19 Sun, C.Z., Boutilier, M.S.H., Au, H., Poesio, P., Bai, B., Karnik, R., Hadjiconstantinou, N.G., “Mechanisms of molecular permeation through nanoporous graphene membranes”, Langmuir, 30(2), 675-682 (2013). 20 Shan, M.X., Xue, Q.Z., Jing, N.N., Ling, C.C., Zhang, T., Yan, Z.F., Zheng, J.T.,
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT “Influence of chemical functionalization on the CO2/N2 separation performance of porous graphene membranes”, Nanoscale, 4(17), 5477-5482 (2012). 21 Hung, W.S., An, Q.F., De Guzman, M., Lin, H.Y., Huang, S.H., Liu, W.R., Hu, C.C., Lee, K.R., Lai, J.Y., “Pressure-assisted self-assembly technique for fabricating
IP
amphiphilic graphene oxide”, Carbon, 68(670-677 (2014).
T
composite membranes consisting of highly ordered selective laminate layers of 22 Yeh, T.M., Wang, Z., Mahajan, D., Hsiao, B.S., Chu, B., “High flux ethanol
J. Mater. Chem. A, 1(41), 12998-13003 (2013).
SC R
dehydration using nanofibrous membranes containing graphene oxide barrier layers”, 23 Huang, K., Liu, G.P., Lou, Y.Y., Dong, Z.Y., Shen, J., Jin, W.Q., “A graphene oxide
NU
membrane with highly selective molecular separation of aqueous organic solution”, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 53(27), 6929-6932 (2014).
24 Tang, Y.P., Paul, D.R., Chung, T.S., “Free-standing graphene oxide thin films
MA
assembled by a pressurized ultrafiltration method for dehydration of ethanol”, J. Membr. Sci., 458, 199-208 (2014).
25 Lou, Y.Y., Liu, G.P., Liu, S.N., Shen, J., Jin, W.Q., “A facile way to prepare graphene
oxide
composite
membrane
via
silane-graft
D
ceramic-supported
modification”, Appl. Surf. Sci., 307, 631-637 (2014).
TE
26 Hu, M., Mi, B.X., “Layer-by-layer assembly of graphene oxide membranes via electrostatic interaction”, J. Membr. Sci., 469, 80-87 (2014).
CE P
27 Huang, H.B., Mao, Y.Y., Ying, Y.L., Liu, Y., Sun, L.W., Peng, X.S., “Salt concentration, pH and pressure controlled separation of small molecules through lamellar graphene oxide membranes”, Chem. Commun., 49(53), 5963-5965 (2013). 28 Huang, X., Yin, Z.Y., Wu, S.X., Qi, X.Y., He, Q.Y., Zhang, Q.C., Yan, Q.Y., Boey, F.,
AC
Zhang, H., “Graphene-Based Materials: Synthesis, Characterization, Properties, and Applications”, Small, 7(14), 1876-1902 (2011). 29 Liu, G.P., Wei, W., Jin, W.Q., “Pervaporation membranes for biobutanol production”, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2(4), 546-560 (2014). 30 Peters, T.A., Poeth, C.H.S., Benes, N.E., Buijs, H., Vercauteren, F.F., Keurentjes, J.T.F., “Ceramic-supported thin PVA pervaporation membranes combining high flux and high selectivity; contradicting the flux-selectivity paradigm”, J. Membr. Sci., 276(1-2), 42-50 (2006). 31 Zhu, Y.X., Xia, S.S., Liu, G.P., Jin, W.Q., “Preparation of ceramic-supported poly(vinyl alcohol)-chitosan composite membranes and their applications in pervaporation dehydration of organic/water mixtures”, J. Membr. Sci., 349(1-2), 341-348 (2010). 32 Gallego-Lizon, T., Edwards, E., Lobiundo, G., dos Santos, L.F., “Dehydration of water/t-butanol mixtures by pervaporation: comparative study of commercially
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT available polymeric, microporous silica and zeolite membranes”, J. Membr. Sci., 197(1-2), 309-319 (2002). 33 van Veen, H.M., van Delft, Y.C., Engelen, C.W.R., Pex, P., “Dewatering of organics by pervaporation with silica membranes”, Sep. Purif. Technol., 22-3(1-3), 361-366
T
(2001).
IP
34 Castricum, H.L., Sah, A., Kreiter, R., Blank, D.H.A., Vente, J.F., ten Elshof, J.E., “Hybrid ceramic nanosieves: stabilizing nanopores with organic links”, Chem.
SC R
Commun., 9, 1103-1105 (2008).
35 Han, Y., Xu, Z., Gao, C., “Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification”, Adv. Funct. Mater., 23(29), 3693-3700 (2013).
NU
36 Li, D., Muller, M.B., Gilje, S., Kaner, R.B., Wallace, G.G., “Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets”, Nat Nano, 3(2), 101-105 (2008). 37 Shu, X.J., Wang, X.R., Kong, Q.Q., Gu, X.H., Xu, N.P., “High-Flux MFI Zeolite
MA
Membrane Supported on YSZ Hollow Fiber for Separation of Ethanol/Water”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(37), 12073-12080 (2012). 38 Suhas, D.P., Raghu, A.V., Jeong, H.M., Aminabhavi, T.M., “Graphene-loaded
D
sodium alginate nanocomposite membranes with enhanced isopropanol dehydration performance via a pervaporation technique”, RSC Advances, 3(38), 17120-17130
TE
(2013).
39 Dreyer, D.R., Murali, S., Zhu, Y., Ruoff, R.S., Bielawski, C.W., “Reduction of
CE P
graphite oxide using alcohols”, J. Mater. Chem., 21(10), 3443 (2011). 40 Buchsteiner, A., Lerf, A., Pieper, J., “Water dynamics in graphite oxide investigated with neutron scattering”, J. Phys. Chem. B, 110(45), 22328-22338 (2006). 41 Zhu, J., Andres, C.M., Xu, J., Ramamoorthy, A., Tsotsis, T., Kotov, N.A.,
AC
“Pseudonegative Thermal Expansion and the State of Water in Graphene Oxide Layered Assemblies”, Acs Nano, 6(9), 8357-8365 (2012). 42 Andrikopoulos, K.S., Bounos, G., Tasis, D., Sygellou, L., Drakopoulos, V., Voyiatzis, G.A., “The Effect of Thermal Reduction on the Water Vapor Permeation in Graphene Oxide Membranes”, Advanced Materials Interfaces, 1(8), 1-8 (2014). 43 Shen, J.F., Hu, Y.Z., Shi, M., Lu, X., Qin, C., Li, C., Ye, M.X., “Fast and facile preparation of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide nanoplatelets”, Chem. Mater., 21, 3514-3520 (2009). 44 Liu, R.L., Arabale, G., Kim, J., Sun, K., Lee, Y.W., Ryu, C.K., Lee, C.G., “Graphene oxide membrane for liquid phase organic molecular separation”, Carbon, 77, 933-938 (2014). 45 Guo, W.F., Chung, T.S., “Study and characterization of the hysteresis behavior of polyimide membranes in the thermal cycle process of pervaporation separation”, J. Membr. Sci., 253(1-2), 13-22 (2005).
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 46 Wang, Y., Goh, S.H., Chung, T.S., Na, P., “Polyamide-imide/polyetherimide dual-layer hollow fiber membranes for pervaporation dehydration of C1-C4 alcohols”, J. Membr. Sci., 326(1), 222-233 (2009). 47 Zhang, G., Song, X., Ji, S., Wang, N., Liu, Z., “Self-assembly of inner skin hollow
T
fiber polyelectrolyte multilayer membranes by a dynamic negative pressure
IP
layer-by-layer technique”, J. Membr. Sci., 325(1), 109-116 (2008).
48 Shi, G.M., Yang, T., Chung, T.S., “Polybenzimidazole (PBI)/zeolitic imidazolate
alcohols”, J. Membr. Sci., 415, 577-586 (2012).
SC R
frameworks (ZIF-8) mixed matrix membranes for pervaporation dehydration of 49 Ong, Y.K., Wang, H., Chung, T.S., “A prospective study on the application of
NU
thermally rearranged acetate-containing polyimide membranes in dehydration of biofuels via pervaporation”, Chem. Eng. Sci., 79, 41-53 (2012). 50 Biduru, S., Sridhar, S., Murthy, G.S., Mayor, S., “Pervaporation of tertiary
MA
butanol/water mixtures through chitosan membranes cross-linked with toluylene diisocyanate”, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 80(12), 1416-1424 (2005). 51 Gallego-Lizon, T., Edwards, E., Lobiundo, G., Freitas dos Santos, L., “Dehydration
D
of water/t-butanol mixtures by pervaporation: comparative study of commercially available polymeric, microporous silica and zeolite membranes”, J. Membr. Sci.,
CE P
TE
197(1–2), 309-319 (2002).
AC
Graphic Abstract
A graphene oxide (GO) membrane was prepared on ceramic disk via a vacuum-assisted filter method. The GO membrane with a typical 2D structure exhibits selective water permeation due to the hydrophilic groups on GO sheets. The ceramic 22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT supported GO membrane with submicron thickness and enhanced mechanical strength was applied for the pervaporation dehydration of butanol. The GO membrane showed a high permeate of 3.1 kg·m-2·h-1 and a separation factor of 230 at the conditions with a
T
PV temperature of 50 oC and a feed water content of 10%(by mass). After running for
AC
CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC R
potential candidates for the dehydration of butanol.
IP
1800 min, the GO membrane still showed a good stability. Such GO membranes are
23