Ionic liquid-capped graphene quantum dots as label-free fluorescent probe for direct detection of ferricyanide

Ionic liquid-capped graphene quantum dots as label-free fluorescent probe for direct detection of ferricyanide

Author’s Accepted Manuscript Ionic liquid-capped graphene quantum dots as label-free fluorescent probe for direct detection of ferricyanide Xue Sun, Y...

2MB Sizes 2 Downloads 103 Views

Author’s Accepted Manuscript Ionic liquid-capped graphene quantum dots as label-free fluorescent probe for direct detection of ferricyanide Xue Sun, Yuting Qian, Yajie Jiao, Jiyang Liu, Fengna Xi, Xiaoping Dong www.elsevier.com/locate/talanta

PII: DOI: Reference:

S0039-9140(16)31036-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.12.085 TAL17175

To appear in: Talanta Received date: 20 August 2016 Revised date: 27 December 2016 Accepted date: 30 December 2016 Cite this article as: Xue Sun, Yuting Qian, Yajie Jiao, Jiyang Liu, Fengna Xi and Xiaoping Dong, Ionic liquid-capped graphene quantum dots as label-free fluorescent probe for direct detection of ferricyanide, Talanta, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.12.085 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1 2

Ionic liquid-capped graphene quantum dots as label-free

3

fluorescent probe for direct detection of ferricyanide

4 5

Xue Sun, Yuting Qian, Yajie Jiao, Jiyang Liu, Fengna Xi*, Xiaoping Dong*

6 7

Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018, China

8 9 10

Submitted to Talanta

11

* Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

12 13

14

Abstract

15

Despite complex molecular and atomic doping, efficient post-functionalization strategies for

16

graphene quantum dots (GQDs) are of key importance to control the physicochemical properties

17

and broaden the practical applications. With ionic liquid as specific modification agents, herein,

18

the preparation of ionic liquid-capped GQDs (IL-GQDs) and its application as label-free

19

fluorescent probe for direct detection of anion were reported. Hydroxyl-functionalized GQDs that

20

could be easily gram-scale synthesized and possessed single-crystalline were chosen as the model

21

GQDs. Also, the most commonly used ionic liquids, water-soluble 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium

22

tetrafluoroborate (BMIMBF4) was chosen as the model IL. Under the ultrasonic treatment,

23

BMIMBF4 easily composited with GQDs to form IL-GQDs. The synthesized IL-GQDs were

24

characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM),

25

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and fluorescence (FL) spectrum. After successful

26

combination with IL, the excitation-independent photoluminescence behavior of GQDs presented

27

almost no change, whereas, the anion responsiveness of IL-GQDs drastically improved, which

28

afforded the IL-GQDs a sensitive response to Fe(CN)63−. Based on the strong fluorescence quench,

29

a facile and sensitive detection of Fe(CN)63− was achieved. A wide linear range of 1.0×10-7 to

30

2.5×10-3 mol l-1 with a low detection limit of 40 nmol l-1 was obtained. As the composition and

31

properties of IL and GQDs could be easily tuned by varying the structure, ionic liquids-capped

32

GQDs might present promising potential for their applications in sensing and catalysis.

33

Keywords: Ionic liquid-capped GQDs; Composite; Fluorescent; Direct detection of anion;

34

Fe(CN)63−

35 36

37

1. Introduction

38

As a new class of luminescent carbon nanomaterials, graphene quantum dots (GQDs) have

39

rapidly attracted great research interests as intriguing candidates for photoluminescent (PL)

40

materials [1-6]. Compared with conventional semiconductor quantum dots (e.g. CdS, CdSe, CdTe

41

and PbS) and rare elements, GQDs are more biocompatible and environmentally friendly. In

42

addition, the stability of photoemission is higher than organic fluorescent dyes and the cost is

43

lower than noble metal (e.g. Au, Ag) clusters. As great efforts have been paid on developing new

44

preparing strategies, the synthetic methods gradually mature at present and a large number of

45

GQDs have been successfully obtained through both “top-down” and “bottom-up” methodologies

46

[7-13]. For example, Wang et al. reported the gram-scale synthesis of single-crystalline GQDs by

47

a facile molecular fusion route under mild and green hydrothermal conditions [14]. Though GQDs

48

have exhibited significant potential in biology, optical devices and sensing applications, their

49

potential for a spectrum of applications are still ongoing. For instance, the sensing platform for

50

cautions has been widely reported, the application for direct detection of anions is nevertheless

51

still rare (only few indirect detection using on-off strategy have been reported [15-17]).

52

Consequently, further extending the arsenal of GQDs materials is still of critical significance. In

53

spite of complex molecular and atomic doping, the efficient post-functionalization is also

54

extremely important because it provides a convenient route to control the physicochemical

55

properties of GQDs and therefore broadens their practical applications.

56

Ionic liquids (ILs) are composed of organic cation and inorganic or organic anion. ILs are

57

regarded as one of the most exciting scientific discoveries in chemical science because of their

58

unique properties such as negligible vapor pressure, thermal stability, recyclability, ionic

59

conductivity, the ability to dissolve a wide range of chemical species, and easy of structural design

60

[18,19]. Moreover, ILs possessed excellent anion exchange properties. Due to those unique

61

properties, ILs-capped carbon nanomaterials have represented an interesting class of materials

62

owing to their exceptional properties arising from the synergistic combination of both components.

63

Due to π-π or cation-π interactions, ILs could easily combine with carbon materials to form

64

composites. For example, ILs-capped carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon nanofiber and graphene

65

have been extensively reported and applied as matrix with excellent solubility and conductivity for

66

electroanalysis [19]. In case of PL carbon materials, ILs-capped carbon quantum dots (CQDs) also

67

demonstrated unique properties. For instance, Wang et al. used citric acid monohydrate as a

68

carbon source and 1-aminopropyl-3-methyl-imida-zolium bromide (APMImBr) ionic liquid as

69

both modification agent and reaction medium to synthesize APMImBr-capped CQDs [20]. With

70

the modification of ILs, [APMIm][Br]-capped CQDs showed high thermal stability and anion

71

responsiveness i.e., CQDs spontaneously transferred from aqueous phase to ethyl acetate phase

72

once the anion of N(CF3SO2)2- was introduced. Wang et al. also prepared highly charged CQDs

73

through one-pot pyrolysis with citric acid as carbon source and APMImBr as capping agent. Due

74

to the IL modification, the as-prepared CQDs depicted a high quantum yield (25.1%) and its

75

amphiphilicity can be facilely tuned by anion exchange, which resulted in spontaneous phase

76

transfer between water and oil phase [21]. Liu et al. applied the microwave-hydrothermal

77

treatment

78

(1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, AMIMCl). AMIMCl helped to dissolve the cellulose in

79

straw and provided nitrogen atoms for the resulting heteroatom doped CQDs. Due to the surface

80

passivation or functionalization of IL, the produced CQDs possessed high quantum yield (22.58%),

81

which was higher than those of the other prepared from biomass. In addition, the CQDs can serve

82

as an effective label-free fluorescent sensor for the detection of Fe(III) ions with a very low

83

detection limit (200 nmol l-1) [22]. To the best of our knowledge, the preparation of ionic

84

liquid-capped GQDs composite with anion responsiveness and their application for direct sensing

85

of anion were few.

for

rice

straw

in

the

mixed

solvent

of

water

and

ionic

liquid

86

With IL as specific modification agents, in this work, we reported the preparation of

87

IL-capped GQDs and its application as label-free fluorescent probe for direct detection of anion.

88

hydroxyl-functionalized GQDs that possessed single-crystalline and could be easily gram-scale

89

prepared were chosen as the model GQDs. Also, the most commonly used and water soluble ionic

90

liquid, BMIMBF4 was chosen as the model IL. With the ultrasonic treatment, BMIMBF4

91

conveniently was combined with GQDs to form IL-GQDs (Scheme1). The role of ILs might lies

92

in two aspects. Firstly, IL could easily combine with GQDs to form composites due to π-π or

93

cation-π interactions. Secondly, IL possessed excellent anion exchange properties. Consequently,

94

more interaction or shorter action distance might occur between IL-GQDs and specific anion,

95

resulting in improved fluorescence quenching and analytical performance. In comparison with

96

GQDs, IL-GQDs presented an almost unchanged PL behavior and the evidently promoted anion

97

responsiveness. Its fluorescence could be strongly quenched in the presence of Fe(CN)63−. On this

98

basis, a facile and sensitive detection of Fe(CN)63− was achieved. The preparation strategy and the

99

main characteristics of IL-GQDs were described and discussed in detail.

100 101 102

2. Experimental section

103

Ionic

104

tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (tris) were purchased from Aladdin Chemistry Co. Ltd. (China).

105

Pyrene (purity > 97%) was obtained from Chengdu Cologne chemical reagent company (China).

106

The other chemicals used in this work were obtained from Hangzhou Gaojing Chemistry Co. Ltd.

107

(China). All chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further purification. All aqueous

108

solutions were prepared with ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm, Milli-Q, Millipore). Solutions

109

containing different cation and anion were applied. The solution of Ag+ was prepared from its

110

nitrate salts. The solution of Pb2+ was prepared from its acetic acid salt. The solutions of Fe3+, Al3+,

111

Mg2+, Cd2+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Cr3+, Hg2+, K+ and Na+ were prepared from their chloride salts. To avoid

112

the hydrolysis of metal ions, pH in the preparation and the following experiments was controlled.

113

Briefly, pH values for Fe3+, Hg2+, Cr3+, and Al3+ were controlled at 2.2, 2.5, 2.5 and 3.0 using

114

glycine-HCl buffer, respectively. Cu2+ (pH 5.0), Zn2+(pH 6.5), Na+(pH 7.0), Pb2+(pH 7.0), K+(pH

115

7.0), Cd2+(pH 7.0), Mg2+(pH 7.0), Ca2+(pH 7.0) solutions were prepared in tris-HCl buffer solution.

116

For Ag+, pH value was set as 6.5 adjusted using Tris or HNO3. For the used anions, solutions of

117

NO3-, S2-, NO2-, S2O32-, HCO3-, H2PO4-, HPO42-, CH3COO- and Cl- were prepared from their

118

sodium salts. The solutions of Br-, Cr2O72-, Fe(CN)63-, Fe(CN)64-, S2O82- and SCN- were prepared

119

from their potassium salts. The pH of anion solution in the preparation and use was controlled by

120

adjusting with tris or HCl. Briefly, pH values for NO3-, NO2-, Cl-, Br-, Fe(CN)63- and Fe(CN)64-

121

solutions were set as 7.0. The pH for solutions of S2O32-, HPO42-, and CH3COO- was controlled as

122

9.0. The pH for solutions of S2O82-, Cr2O72-, H2PO4-, and SCN- was controlled as 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5,

123

respectively. The solution of S2- solutions were prepared in NaHCO3-Na2CO3 buffer solution at pH

124

11.5.

2.1 Materials and reagents liquid,

1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium

tetrafluoroborate

(BMIMBF4),,

and

125

2.2 Instrumentations

126

The fluorescence (FL) spectrum and intensity were recorded on an RF-5301PC

127

spectrofluorometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). Transmission electron microscopic (TEM)

128

photograph was taken on a JEM-2100 transmission electron microscope at operating voltage of

129

200 kV (JEOL Ltd., Japan). The sample was dispersed in water and then drop-casted on ultrathin

130

carbon-coated copper grid. For atomic force microscopy (AFM) characterization, the aqueous

131

solution of GQDs or IL-GQDs was spotted onto freshly cleaved mica surface and dried in air. The

132

samples were measured in air by tapping mode on MFP-3D AFM microscope (Asylum research).

133

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterizations were conducted by using a PHI5300

134

electron spectrometer using 250 W, 14KV, Mg Kα radiation (PE Ltd., USA). Fourier transform

135

infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the IL, GQDs and IL-GQDs were obtained using a Spectrum 5700

136

(Nicolet Instrument Co. USA)

137

2.3 Preparation of the IL-GQDs

138

IL-GQDs were prepared by combination of IL with pre-synthesized GQDs (Scheme 1).

139

Firstly, GQDs with hydroxyl groups were prepared according to the literature [14] with little

140

modification. The synthesis involved the hydrothermal treatment of 1,3,6-trinitropyrene in alkaline

141

NaOH solution for molecular fusion. Briefly, 1,3,6-trinitropyrene (2 mg/mL) was dispersed in

142

NaOH solution (150 mL, 5 mg/mL) by ultrasonically treating for 1 h. The obtained mixture was

143

transferred to poly(tetrafluoroethylene)-lined autoclave and heated at 200 oC for 4h. After cooling

144

down to room temperature, the resulting GQDs solution was filtered through a 0.45 μm

145

microporous membrane to remove undissolved carbon product, and dialysed by dialysis bag (3500

146

Da) against water for 3 days to remove the molecular precursors. The obtained solution in dialysis

147

bag (GQDs > 3500 Da) was further dialysed with retained molecular weight of 6000Da for 3 days

148

to remove impurities with large size. Finally, the obtained GQDs (3500-6000Da) were freeze dried

149

to a brown powder.

150

Secondly, IL-GQDs were prepared by mixing GQDs solution (3500-6000Da, 0.02 mg/mL)

151

with BMIMBF4 (100:1, V/V) and ultrasonically treating for 30 min. The formed solution was

152

dialyzed by dialysis bag (1000 Da) against water for 1 day to remove unbound IL.

153

Quantum yield (QY) of the GQDs and IL-GQDs was measured by using Rhodamine B as the

154

standard sample and was computed according to the following equation:

Yμ = Ys 

155

Fu As Fs Aμ

156

where Yμ and Ys are the quantum yield of the GQDs or IL-GQDs and the standard substance, Fu

157

and Fs respectively stand for the integral fluorescence intensity of the test GQDs or IL-GQDs and

158

the diluted standard solution and Aμ and As are the maximum absorbance value of GQDs or

159

IL-GQDs and the diluted standard solution, respectively [22].

160

2.4 Fluorescent detection of Fe(CN)63− using IL-GQDs

161

A solution of IL-GQDs (0.02 mg/mL) in 50 mM tris-HCl buffer solution (pH = 7.0) was used

162

as an FL probe toward Fe(CN)63−. In a typical run, IL-GQDs solution was mixed with different

163

amount of Fe(CN)63−. After the resulting solution was shaken well and incubated for 30 min at

164

room temperature, the FL emission spectra (excited at 470 nm) were recorded. The detection

165

measurements were performed in triplicate. The relative FL intensity (F0- F)/F0 versus Fe(CN)63−

166

concentration were used for calibration. Here, F0 and F are the FL intensities of IL-GQDs in the

167

absence and presence of different concentration of Fe(CN)63−, respectively.

168

3. Results and discussion

169

3.1 Photcture characterization of the IL-GQDs

170

The PL characteristics of both GQDs and IL-GQDs were investigated to evaluate the effect of

171

IL. Results were given in Fig. 1. As illustrated in the inset of the figure, both GQDs (pH=7.0, 0.02

172

mg/mL) and IL-GQDs (pH=7.0, 0.02 mg/mL calculated using GQDs) were pale-yellow,

173

transparent solution under daylight, indicating their hydrophilic characters. Such property might

174

be ascribed to the large amount of hydroxyl groups in GQDs and the hydrophilicity of the

175

water-soluble ionic liquid, BMIMBF4. When the aqueous suspensions of GQDs and IL-GQDs

176

were UV irradiated (365 nm), strong green fluorescence without obvious difference was observed.

177

To further study the FL property, FL spectra were recorded. As shown in Fig. 1a, the spectra of

178

GQDs in the absence and presence of ionic liquids were almost constant when excited at 470 nm.

179

In addition, the emission spectra of GQDs and IL-GQDs with progressively increased excitation

180

wavelengths from 400 to 470 nm with 10 nm increment were recorded. Excitation-independent PL

181

behaviors were revealed, suggesting single-emission fluorescence center and high crystallinity

182

[14]. The maximum excitation and emission wavelengths of the GQDs and IL-GQDs were

183

revealed at 470 nm and 512 nm, respectively (Fig. 1b, Fig. S1). The above results confirmed that

184

the incorporation of IL did not change the FL characteristics of GQDs including the maximum

185

emission wavelength and intensity. Also, significant improvement of the FL intensity was not

186

observed in this IL-GQDs composite.

187

The FL intensity of the IL-GQDs at different pH was studied. The pH of the solution was

188

adjusted by NaOH or HCl (Fig. S2). FL intensity was low at such strong acidic conditions,

189

whereas, it increased dramatically with the increase of pH value. When pH was above 6,

190

fluorescent intensity was relative stable. The phenomenon might be ascribed to the ionization of

191

hydroxyl groups of GQDs [14]. It is well known that electronic structure and charge density might

192

affect the opitical characteristics of GQDs. The QYs of GQDs and IL-GQDs were 12.1%,11.8%

193

at pH 7.0, respectively. Photo bleaching experiment of IL-GQDs was also performed to evaluate

194

the photo stability. IL-GQDs were irradiated continually for 4 hours under UV lamp (365 nm).

195

Results were shown in Fig. S3. It was demonstrated that the FL intensity of IL-GQDs can

196

maintain 94% of the original signal with four-hour irradiating under UV light, indicating good

197

photo stability.

198

3.2 Structure characterization of the IL-GQDs

199

Elemental analysis of the GQDs and IL-GQDs was performed by XPS. As shown in Fig. 2a,

200

the full-scan XPS spectrum confirmed that GQDs were composed of carbon and oxygen.

201

Fine-structure spectrum of C 1s (Fig. 2a) exhibited two main peaks 286.6eV and 284.6eV,

202

implying the C=C and C-OH groups due to the graphitic and hydroxyl groups modified carbon

203

atoms (Fig. 2a). The only one peak for O 1s was ascribed to hydroxyl groups formed from the

204

molecular fusion of 1,3,6-trinitropyrene in alkaline NaOH solution under the hydrothermal

205

treatment (Fig. 2a). Those results were consistent with the results reported in the literature [14]. As

206

known, 1,3,6-trinitropyrene possessed the same mother nucleus structure with graphene and could

207

occur molecular fusion in hydrothermal reaction to form graphene framework [14]. As the

208

powerful electrophilicity of nitro groups,the addition reaction can happen with electron-rich -OH

209

groups and resulted in GQDs with a large amount of hydroxyl groups. In the case of IL-GQDs, the

210

full range XPS spectrum demonstrated the presence of C, N, O, B and F (Fig. 2d). The

211

corresponding C1s, N1s, O1s, B1s and F1s peaks centered at 284eV, 403eV, 534eV, 194.6eV and

212

684.5eV, respectively. Despite C=C or C-C (284.6eV) and C-OH (286.8eV), C-N centered at

213

285.9eV was observed corresponding to the presence of N element in IL. Similarly with O 1s of

214

GQDs, only OH groups were observed. The N1s peaks at 401.8eV and 403.6eV are ascribed to the

215

imidazole ring and C-N, the two kinds of in amide group and imidazole ring of BMIMBF4. The

216

presence of bromine and fluorine further proved the successful attachment of IL onto GQDs. The

217

interaction between IL and GQDs might lie in π-π or cation-π interactions and a carbon core with

218

peripheral cationic-ionic pairs might form. FTIR spectrum was also used to confirm the groups of

219

GQDs and IL-GQDs (Fig. S4). Both the GQDs and IL-GODs showed absorption of hydroxyl

220

group (3400 cm-1) and C-OH (1150 cm-1). Compared with GQDs, the FT-IR spectrum of IL,

221

IL-GQD showed the additional absorption peak from C-N stretching vibration at 1169cm-1. The

222

peak around 1572 and 1465cm-1 in IL and IL-GQDs were related to the typical stretching of

223

imidazole ring [23]. These results were consistent with the results from XPS and further confirmed

224

the successful hybridization of IL with GQDs.

225

The morphology characteristics of IL-GQDs were investigated using TEM and AFM. TEM

226

images revealed that IL-GQDs were well-dispersed (Fig. 3a, b) with relatively uniform size

227

distribution of 1.6-2.4 nm. The average diameter of the IL-GQDs was calculated to be 2.0 nm

228

(inset of Fig. 3c). High resolution TEM (HRTEM) image (Fig. 3d) showed clear lattice structure

229

of the IL-GQDs, indicating high crystallinity. The lattice spacing was measured to be about 0.23

230

nm, which can be attributed to the (100) facets of graphite [14]. AFM was used to evaluate the

231

height profiles of GQDs and IL-GQDs. As demonstrated in Fig. 4, GQDs showed a typical

232

topographic height of about 2.8 nm, indicating that most of the GQDs consisted of 3-5 layer of

233

graphite. For IL-GQDs, the topographic height increased to about 3.4 nm, confirming the

234

modification of IL onto GQDs.

235

3.3 Selective FL response of IL-GQDs towards anion

236

The GQDs-based FL sensing system has been widely reported. The selectivity of cations was

237

mainly achieved based on coordination or electrostatic effect because GQDs usually contained

238

carboxyl or hydroxyl groups or doped hetero atoms (e.g. N, S). However, research on direct anion

239

responsiveness of GQDs is nevertheless still rare. Due to the unique ion-exchange property of IL,

240

the IL-GQDs in this work were expected to possess anion responsiveness.

241

To test the selectivity of anion, the FL quenching experiments of both GQDs and IL-GQDs

242

were investigated. The FL quenching efficiency of (F0-F)/F0 was determined. Here, F0 and F were

243

the FL intensities of GQDs or IL-GQDs in the absence and presence of different ion, respectively.

244

The commonly used anions including HCO3-, H2PO4-, S2O82-, SCN-, HPO42-, Ac-, Cl-, NO3- , S2-,

245

NO2-, Br-, S2O32-, Cr2O72-, Fe(CN)63- and Fe(CN)64− were tested. As given in Fig. 5a, the FL of

246

GQDs could be slightly quenched by Cr2O72-, Fe(CN)63- and Fe(CN)64− with FL quenching

247

efficiency between 0.1-0.2. The other anions only caused faintly FL quenching with quenching

248

efficiency below 0.1. In case of IL-GQDs, the same anion selectivity was revealed, whereas, the

249

fluorescence quenching efficiency greatly improved towards Fe(CN)63- and Fe(CN)64−. For

250

Fe(CN)63-, the highest fluorescence quenching efficiency was observed. In order to eliminate

251

possible cation interference, the selectivity towards the commonly used cations was also

252

determined including Fe3+, Cr3+, Na+, Pb2+, K+, Cu2+, Cd3+, Al3+, Zn2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Ag+, Hg2+.

253

Among the tested ions, only Fe3+ possessed remarkable quenching for the FL of IL-GQDs (Fig.

254

5b). That may interfere with the detection of Fe(CN)63−. This issue can be circumvented by using

255

ascorbic acid (AA) as chelating agents for Fe3+ ions [24]. The above results showed that Fe(CN)63−

256

present the highest quenching for the FL of IL-GQDs over the other anions and cations. In

257

comparison with GQDs, also, the IL-GQDs as a FL probe promised much improved selectivity for

258

Fe(CN)63−. The reasons might lie in three aspects. Firstly, the used GQDs might have selectivity

259

towards iron based ions. Secondly, the corporation of IL on GQDs might regulate the

260

physicochemical property, especially the electrostatic property, of the GQDs. Compared with

261

GQDs, IL-GQDs might present a carbon core with peripheral cationic-ionic pairs. Thus, the

262

electrostatic effect between Fe(CN)63− and IL-GQDs might be promoted. Thirdly, Fe(CN)63− was

263

bulky anion and could anion-exchange with BF4- of IL (Scheme 1). More systematic work on the

264

mechanism of such selectivity was under way in our laboratory. By controlling the redox property

265

of the medium solution, Fe(CN)63− and Fe(CN)64− can be easily distinguished. For example,

266

Fe(CN)63− will transfer to be Fe(CN)64− in presence of hydroxylamine hydrochloride. On the other

267

hand, Fe(CN)64− will be converted into Fe(CN)63− with oxidizing agent.

268

3.4 Direct detection of Fe(CN)63− using IL-GQDs as FL probe

269

FL quenching of IL-GQDs caused by Fe(CN)63− at different pH was further explored. To

270

adjusted the pH of the solution, glycine-HCl buffer solution (pH=3), tris-HCl buffer solution (pH

271

4-9) and carbonate buffer solution (pH 10-11) were used. The concentration of the buffer solution

272

was set as 30 mmol l-1. As the buffer solution introduced anions and cations, the effect of the

273

buffer solution was firstly studied. The fluorescrnce intensities of IL-GQDs in buffer solution

274

were compared with those obtained by adjusting pH only with NaOH or HCl. Consistent results

275

with change no more than 5% at maximum emission wavelength were obtained (Fig. S5),

276

indicating no significant effect caused by the introduced by anions and cations in the buffer

277

solutions. Then the fluoscrescence quenching caused by Fe(CN)63− was studied by measuring the

278

fluorescence intensity in absence (F0) and presence (F) of Fe(CN)63− (Fig. S5) and calculating the

279

relative change as (F0-F)/F0 (Fig. S6). Obviously, the values of (F0-F)/F0 had great changes at pH

280

3.0-6.0 (Fig. S6). As most of the environmental or biological water bodies are neutral or nearly

281

neutral, the neutral solution (pH 7.0) that gave the highest FL quenching ratio was chosen for

282

further investigation.

283

The kinetic behavior of reactions between the IL-GQDs and Fe(CN)63− was investigated by

284

plotting relative FL intensities (F/F0) as a function of time. The reactions reached the quenching

285

equilibrium in about 30 min (Fig. S7). Therefore, 30 min was chosen as reaction equilibrium time

286

in the subsequent detection experiments.As Fe(CN)63− presented the highest FL quenching

287

efficiency for the

288

Fe(CN)63− based on direct FL quenching of IL-GQDs was performed. IL-GQDs solution reacted

289

with different concentrations of Fe(CN)63− and the FL spectra were measured. As shown in Fig. 6a,

290

the FL intensity of IL-GQDs decreased with increase of the concentration of Fe(CN)63−, proving

291

the validity of the FL assay for detection of Fe(CN)63−. The dependence of (F0-F)/F0 on the

292

concentration of Fe(CN)63− ions was concluded in Fig. 6b. Linear correlation existed between the

293

value of (F0-F)/F0 at 512 nm and the concentration of Fe(CN)63− in the range of 1.0×10-7 to

294

2.5×10-3 mol l-1. A well-resolved linear part (R2 = 0.994) was found in the concentration range of

295

1.0×10-7--5.0×10-5 mol l-1 and another linear part (R2 = 0.995) presented in the concentration range

296

of 5.0×10-5-2.5×10-3 mol l-1. The detection limit was calculated to be 40 nmol l-1 [25]. The direct

297

determination strategy was different form the indirect detection of anion that reported in the

298

literature. For example, Zhao et al. fabricated CQDs containing plenty of carboxylate moieties

IL-GQDs over the other anions and cations, a quantitative analysis of

299

[15]. After coordinated with Eu3+ ions, the fluorescence of CQDs turned off. As Eu3+ displayed

300

higher affinity with oxygen-donor atoms from phosphate (pi) than that with the ones from the

301

carboxylate groups of CQDs, turn-on FL can be observed with the addition of pi due to the strong

302

coordination between pi and Eu3+. Thus, the indirect determination of anion was achieved.

303

Obviously, the direct detection present in this work was much more convenient.

400

3.5 Quantitation detection of Fe(CN)63- in real water samples

401

The applicability of IL-GQDs for detecting Fe(CN)63− in real river water was further

402

evaluated. Determination of Fe(CN)63− in the water from Jinsha Lake in Hangzhou (China) was

403

then carried out. Before use, the river samples were filtered through a membrane (0.22 μm) and

404

then centrifuged (15000 r/min) for 10 min. When Fe(CN)63− (0.015-1.5 mM) was added to such

405

river sample, the recoveries of three samples were between 91.3% and 95.3% (Table 1). The

406

detection measurements were performed in triplicate and the RSD was below 2.0 %. The results

407

indicated that this FL probe is promising for direct Fe(CN)63- detection in real samples.

408

4. Conclusion

409

With ionic liquid as specific modification agents, herein, the preparation of ionic

410

liquid-capped GQDs (IL-GQDs) and its application as label-free FL probe for direct detection of

411

anion were reported. The advantages of the proposed method and the prepared IL-GQDs lie in

412

four aspects. (1) After successful combination with IL, the IL-GQDs did not only preserve the

413

excitation-independent PL behavior of GQDs, but also presented the markedly enhanced anion

414

responsiveness, which afforded the IL-GQDs a sensitive response to anion. (2) Based on the

415

improved FL quenching, a facile and direct FL sensor for sensitive detection of Fe(CN)63− was

416

achieved with wide linear range and low detection limit. (3) Compared with complex molecular

417

and atomic doping, the modification of GQDs with functional ILs provided a simple and efficient

418

post-functionalization way to adjust the physicochemical properties of GQDs. (4) As the

419

composition and properties of IL and GQs could easily be tuned by varying the structure, ionic

420

liquids-capped GQDs might present promising potential for broadening the practical applications

421

of GQDs in sensing and catalysis

422

Acknowledgements

423

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science

424

Foundation of China (No. 21305127), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of

425

China (Y15B050022, Y17B050008), the Science Foundation of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University

426

(13062173-Y) and 521 talent project of ZSTU.

References [1] R.L. Sun, Y. Wang, Y.N. Ni, S. Kokot, Talanta 125 (2014) 341. [2] J. Peng, W. Gao, B.K. Gupta, Z. Liu , R.R. Aburto, L.H. Ge, L. Song, Nano Lett. 12(2012) 844. [3] Z. Z. Wu, W.Y. Li, J. Chen, C. Yu, Talanta 119 (2014) 538. [4] X. Yan, X. Cui, B.S. Li , L.S. Li, J, Nano Lett. 10(2010) 1869. [5] X.M. Li, M.C. Rui, J.Z. Song, Z.H. Shen, H.B. Zeng, Adv. Funct. Mater. 25 (2015) 4929. [6] X. Yan, X. Cui, L.S. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2010) 5944. [7] F.E. Lin, C. Gui, W. Wen, X. Zhang, Talanta 158(2016) 292. [8] S.Y. Bian, C. Shen, H. Hua, L. Zhou, F.N. Xi, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 69977. [9] X. Wang, G. Sun, N. Li, P. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (2016) 2239. [10] N. Li, A. Than, X. Wang, S. Xu, L. Sun, H. Duan, C.J. Xu, P. Chen, ACS Nano. 10(2016) 3622. [11] X.H. Zhao, L. Gong, Y. Wu, X.B. Zhang, J. Xie, Talanta, 149 (2016), 98. [12] R.L. Liu, D.Q. Wu, X.L. Feng , K. Müllen, J. Am.Chem.Soc.133 (2011) 15221. [13] B. Lin, C. Li, Wang, J.X. Luo, Q.W. Guo, K.Y. Liu, K. Liu, W.J. Zhao, Y.Q. Lin, Talanta 144 (2015) 1301. [14] L. Wang, Y.L. Wang, T. Xu, H. B. Liao, C.J. Yao, Y. Liu , Z. Li, Z.W. Chen, D.Y. Pan, L.T. Sun, M.H. Wu, Nature Commun. 5 (2014) 5357. [15] B.F. Shi, L.L. Zhang, C.Q. Lan, J.J. Zhao, Y.B. Su, S.L. Zhao, Talanta 142 (2015) 131. [16] C.F. Zhang, Y.Y. Cui, L. Song, X. F. Liu, Z.B. Hu, Talanta 150 (2016) 54. [17] H.X. Zhao, L.Q. Liu, Z.D. Liu, Y. Wang, X.J. Zhao , C.Z. Huang, Chem. Commun. 47 (2011) 2604. [18] A.A. Hamad, M.A. Alsaadi, M. Hayyan, I. Juneidi, M.A. Hashim, Electrochim. Acta. 193 (2016) 321. [19] S.G. Zhang, Q.H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z.J. Chen, M. Watanabe, Y.Q. Deng, Prog. Mater Sci. 77 (2016) 80. [20] B. G. Wang, W.W. Tang, H.S. Lu, Z.Y. Huang, J. Mater Sci. 50 (2015) 5411. [21] A. Ananthanarayanan, X.W. Wang, P. Routh, B. Sana, S. Lim , D.H. Kim, K.H. Lim, J. Li, P.

14

Chen, Adv. Funct. Mater. 24 (2014) 3021. [22] R. L. Liu , M.P. Gao, J. Zhang, Z. L. Li, J.Y. Chen, P. Liu, D.Q. Wu, RSC Adv. 5 (2015) 24205. [23] J. Ju, W. Chen, Biosens. Bioelectron. 58 (2014) 219. [24] F.X. Wang, Z.Y. Gu, W. Lei, W. J. Wang, X.F. Xia, Q.L. Hao, Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 190 (2014) 516. [25] D. Badocco, I. Lavagnini, A. Mondin, G. Favaro, P. Pastore, Spectrochim. Acta B.114(2015) 81.

15

Table 1 Detection of Fe(CN)63− in water samples. [a] Fe(CN)63− added Fe(CN)63− found Samples (mM) (mM)

Recovery (%)

RSD (%)

Samples 1

1.50

1.43

95.3

0.83

Samples 2 Samples 3

0.150 0.015

0.141 0.0137

94.0 91.3

1.36 1.98

[a] Reaction conditions: IL-GQDs (pH=7.0, tris-HCl buffer solution, 0.02 mg/mL), reactions time: 30 min , excitation wavelengths: 470 nm.

16

Figures Captions Scheme 1. Schematic illustration for the preparation of green IL-GQDs and turn-off detection of Fe(CN)63−. Fig. 1.

(a) FL emission spectra of GQDs and IL-GQDs excited at 470nm. (b) FL emission

spectra of IL-GQDs obtained with excitation wavelength progressively being increased from 400 to 470 nm (wavelength interval between adjacent lines was 10 nm). The insets are the photographs of GQDs (left 1 and 3) and IL-GQDs (left 2 and 4) aqueous solution under visible light and UV light of 365 nm, respectively. Fig. 2.

(a) Full-scan XPS, (B) high-resolution C 1s, (C) high-resolution O 1s spectra of the

GQDs. (d) Full-scan XPS, (e) high-resolution C 1s, (f) high-resolution O 1s, (g) high-resolution N 1s, (h) high-resolution B 1s, (i) high-resolution F 1s spectra of the IL-GQDs. Fig. 3.

(a, b) Low-magnification TEM and (c, d) HRTEM images of the as-prepared IL-GQDs.

The inset in figure c was the corresponding size distribution of the IL-GQDs. The labeled number in figure d was the lattice spacing of IL-GQDs. Fig. 4.

AFM images of the GQDs (a) and IL-GQDs (b) on mica substrate. Inset in each figure

was the height profiles along the lines. Fig. 5.

(a) The variation of (F0-F)/F0 of IL-GQDs and GQDs in presence of different anions

(excitation at 470 nm). The concentration of all anions was set as 1.0×10-3 mol l-1. (b) Variation of (F0-F)/F0 of IL-GQDs and GQDs in presence of different cautions (excitation at 470 nm). The concentration of all cations was set as 1.0×10-3 mol l-1. AA was used as the masking agent and its concentration was set as 2.5×10-3 mol l-1. Fig. 6.

(a) Fluorescent spectra of IL-GQDs in the presence of different concentrations of

Fe(CN)63−. Curves of a-m (from top to bottom) represented the concentrations of Fe(CN)63− as 0, 1.0×10-7, 1.0×10-6, 5.0×10-6, 1.0×10-5, 5.0×10-5, 1.0×10-4, 2.5×10-4, 5.0×10-4, 1.0×10-3, 1.5×10-3, 2.0×10-3, 2.5×10-3 mol l-1, respectively. Insets were photos of IL-GQDs under daylight and 365nm UV light (from left to right) containing Fe(CN)63− (1.0×10-3 mol l-1). (b) Variation of (F0-F)/F0 as a function of the concentration of Fe(CN)63−.

17

Scheme 1.

18

Fig. 1.

19

Fig. 2.

20

Fig. 3.

21

Fig. 4.

22

23

Fig. 5.

24

Fig. 6.

Highlights (1) Ionic liquid-capped GQDs (IL-GQDs) were easily prepared. (2) IL-GQDs was used as label-free fluorescent probe for direct detection of Fe(CN)63−. (3) Sensitive detection of Fe(CN)63− with low detection limit was achieved.

25

Graphic abstract

26