Pylorogastric intussusception in a Chihuahua puppy. A case report

Pylorogastric intussusception in a Chihuahua puppy. A case report

Journal of Ultrasound (2010) 13, 175e178 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jus Pylorogastric intussuscep...

765KB Sizes 2 Downloads 67 Views

Journal of Ultrasound (2010) 13, 175e178

available at www.sciencedirect.com

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jus

Pylorogastric intussusception in a Chihuahua puppy. A case report L. Lideo a,*, F. Mutinelli b, R. Milan a a b

Baroni Veterinary Clinic, Rovigo, Italy Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Venice, Legnaro, Padua, Italy

KEYWORDS Canine; Pylorogastric intussusception; Ultrasonography; Chihuahua.

Abstract A three-month-old Chihuahua dog was presented with acute abdominal pain, vomiting and cardiovascular shock. Abdominal ultrasound (US) and iodated contrast gastrogram revealed suspected pylorogastric intussusception. Because of the poor prognosis the dog was euthanatized. Diagnosis of pylorogastric intussusception was confirmed at necropsy. Parasitological, virological, serological and histological examinations were also performed. This report documents the sixth case of pylorogastric (i.e. duodenogastric, gastrogastric) intussusception in the veterinary medical literature and it is the first report on a puppy dog in which US and radiographic diagnosis were confirmed post mortem. Sommario Un Chihuahua di tre mesi e ` stato visitato con anamnesi di addome acuto, vomito, e shock cardiovascolare. L’ecografia addominale e i radiogrammi gastrici con mezzo di contrasto iodato rivelavano la presenza di un’intussuscezione pilorogastrica. A causa della prognosi non favorevole il cane e ` stato sottoposto a eutanasia. La diagnosi di intussuscezione pilorogastrica e ` stata confermata alla necroscopia; sono stati eseguiti gli esami parassitologici, virologici, sierologici, e istologici. Questo caso clinico rappresenta la sesta segnalazione di intussuscezione pilorogastrica (i.e., duodeno gastrica, gastrogastrica) nella letteratura scientifica veterinaria e rappresenta il primo caso per un cucciolo in cui la diagnosi ecografica e radiografica e ` stata confermata alla necroscopia. ª 2010 Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved.

Introduction Intussusception is defined as a prolapse of a part of the intestine into the lumen of an immediately adjoining part and has been reported in both humans and animals. In dogs

* Corresponding author. Via Verdi 35/A, 35020 Sant’Angelo di Piove di Sacco, Padua, Italy. E-mail address: [email protected] (L. Lideo). 1971-3495/$ - see front matter ª 2010 Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jus.2010.10.004

and cats intussusception most commonly occurs at the ileocecocolic junction where invagination is usually in the normal direction of peristalsis. Occasionally invaginations occur in the reverse direction (oral direction) within the small intestine and in other parts of the alimentary tract (i.e. gastroesophageal, pylorogastric or duodenogastric intussusceptions) [1,3,5,7,10]. Our report describes the first case of pylorogastric intussusception in a puppy of a small-breed dog along with clinical, radiological, US and post mortem findings.

176

L. Lideo et al.

Case history A three-month-old, female Chihuahua dog, 650 g body weight (BW), with an acute history of abdominal pain, vomiting and hypovolemic shock was presented to our clinic. The vomiting had occurred on a few occasions during the previous week. At the time of the examination, clinical findings included lethargy, dehydration (approximately 8%) and hypothermia (36.5  C). The dog’s abdomen was tense on palpation. A complete blood count (CBC), serum biochemical analysis (SBA) and urinalysis (UA) were performed, and therapy with intravenous (IV) lactated Ringer’s solution (LRS) was administered. Clinicopathological abnormalities included moderate leukocytosis (21.07  103/mL; reference range (RR): 5.5e16.9  103/mL), high neutrophil count (13.82 103/mL; RR: 2e12  103/mL) and monocytosis (3.26  103/mL; RR: 0.1e1.4  103/mL). Serum biochemical abnormalities included hypoproteinemia (4 g/dL; RR: 5.7e7.7 g/dL), hypoalbuminemia (1.6 g/dL; RR: 2.6e4 g/dL), low calcium levels (7.6 mg/dL; RR: 8e12 mg/dL) and hypocholesterolemia (73 mg/dL; RR: 110e300 mg/dL). Electrolytes presented moderate hyponatriemia (140 mmol/L; RR: 146e154 mmol/L), hypochloridemia (97 mmol/L; RR: 107e125 mmol/L) and mild metabolic alkalosis (27 mmol/L; RR: 14e24 mmol/L), while hematic pH was 7.44. UA showed a specific gravity of 1.015 with aciduria (urine pH 6). Intravenous fluid therapy was continued using 0.9% sodium chloride solution (6 mL/kg BW/hour), ranitidine (4 mg/kg BW) and cefazolin (22 mg/kg BW). Abdominal radiograph showed distension of the gastric area. Abdominal US examination was performed (General Electric Logic 5 Expert) using a 7.5e10 MHz convex probe in order to evaluate the cause of the abdominal pain; the stomach was distended and filled with fluid, and the pyloric region appeared laminated, while the pylorus and proximal duodenum were displaced into the pyloric antrum and fundus. In addition, multiple concentric echogenic and echolucent rings were visible. A severe hypoechoic gastric mucosal layer caused by edema was also present (Fig. 1). Radiographic evaluation of the stomach and duodenum using iodated contrast medium showed double lines into the gastric lumen associated with abnormal distension of the stomach. Radiographic analysis 45 and 120 min after ingestion of iodated contrast media demonstrated weak propulsion of the contrast medium and a double layer into the gastric lumen. Diagnosis of pylorogastric intussusception was made, and the dog was euthanatized because of the poor prognosis. Diagnosis was subsequently confirmed at necropsy, but the clear causes were not found. Parasitological, serological and virological examinations were negative, while histological examination revealed diffuse superficial erosion of the gastric mucosal layer (Fig. 2).

Discussion Previous reports have described pylorogastric intussusception in dogs, where the distal segment (duodenum) was the intussusceptum prolapsing into the stomach [1,6,14].

Fig. 1 US examination of the pylorogastric intussusceptions. (a) Transverse image of the pyloric region. Multiple concentric echogenic and echolucent rings were visible. (b) Longitudinal image of intussusceptions seen in (a); pylorus and proximal duodenum were displaced into the pyloric antrum and fundus; severely hypoechoic gastric mucosal layer caused by edema (arrow).

Intestinal intussusception is usually described in dogs of less than one year of age and it commonly occurs at the ileocecocolic junction. The vast majority of cases of intussusception is of unknown origin [5,9,11,12,14]. In young dogs, enteritis (viral, parasitic or immunomediated) and general anesthesia, with or without abdominal surgical procedures, have been identified as possible predisposing factors. In dogs with pylorogastric intussusception, the cause or underlying etiological factors are unknown. Most cases of intussusception occur within the small bowel in the aboral direction. In this case, the dog presented pylorogastric intussusception in which the pylorus and proximal duodenum were invaginated in the oral (i.e. retrograde) direction into the body of the stomach. There are only five previously reported cases of pylorogastric/duodenogastric intussusceptions in the veterinary medical literature.

Pylorogastric intussusception in a Chihuahua puppy

177

Fig. 2 Diffuse superficial erosion of the gastric mucosal layer, sub-mucosal congestion and mild edema.

The case reported in this paper had marked similarities with the precedents: all dogs presented acute, severe vomiting, marked dehydration, tachycardia and abdominal pain [1]. Applewhite et al. [2] sustain that diagnosis of pylorogastric intussusception is difficult to confirm without exploratory celiotomy, but we affirm that diagnosis could be confirmed at US and radiographic examinations. In our dog, US and radiographic procedures confirmed the diagnosis of pylorogastric intussusception, and exploratory celiotomy was not required for diagnostic purposes. Our US findings support the US results obtained by Lee et al. [6]. Furthermore, positive-contrast gastrogram and necropsy also confirmed the diagnosis (Fig. 3). Treatment of pylorogastric intussusception was not successful in two of the previously reported cases. Two dogs underwent celiotomy with surgical reduction of intussusception, and post-operative follow-up was 20 and 4 months, respectively. Only one dog had spontaneous resolution [6]. The five dogs with diagnosis of this pathology were a 2-yearold neutered female English Sheepdog, a 7-year-old female Basset Hound, a 3-year-old male Rottweiler, a 10-monthold neutered male Saint Bernard and a 7-year-old female Maltese. Our case was a 3-month-old puppy dog of a very small breed (Chihuahua, 650 g BW) with severe pylorogastric intussusception, whose poor condition prevented us from performing surgery. None of the reported canine cases presented foreign bodies within the stomach or anywhere else in the gastrointestinal tract that could constitute predisposing causes. In our patient, histopathological evaluation of the stomach, pylorus, bowel, liver, spleen, kidney and lung showed no identifiable predisposing abnormalities. However, the stomach presented diffuse superficial erosion of the mucosal layer. Fecal parasitological and virological electron microscope examinations were negative. A possible etiological factor could be the presence of a predisposing inflammation due to a primary gastritis that could have stimulated the release of inflammatory mediators and vasoactive compounds from a variety of cell types (e.g. neutrophils, mast cells, platelets, endothelial cells,

Fig. 3 Comparison between iodinated contrast enhanced X-ray 120 min after ingestion (b) and necropsy finding (a); there is a close correspondence between the two images.

neurons). Exfoliation of the superficial gastric epithelial cells and destruction of the normal mucosal barrier resulted in gastric acid, pepsin and gastric lipase back-diffusion. This inflammatory cascade may have stimulated further acid secretion and mucosal damage and may thus have increased cell membrane permeability, altering the microvascular blood flow and gastric motility [4,8,13,15]. In conclusion, pylorogastric intussusception is a very rare condition described in the veterinary medical literature (6 documented cases in the last 26 years), as the event is often transitory and resolves on its own. In some cases the stenosis is partial leaving a possibility for the food bolus to pass causing nonspecific transitory symptoms with partial solution of the problem. This pathology is not often described or studied due to the dog’s young age; it generally dies after the

178 initial therapies and further investigation is therefore interrupted. Etiological factors are unknown in absence of a gastrointestinal mass; predisposing factors include gastric inflammation, intestinal parasitism, viral enteritis, gastrointestinal foreign body and intraluminal and extraluminal mass lesions [2]. Our case confirms gastric inflammation as a possible predisposing etiological factor for pylorogastric intussusception. It also confirms that US and radiographic examinations are valid diagnostic tools for reaching a clinical diagnosis. However, prognosis is very poor in these patients, and further investigation is therefore required to identify effective curative treatment options.

Conflict of interest statement The authors have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Dr. Eliana Schiavon (Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Venice, Legnaro, Italy) for the assistance.

References [1] Applewhite AA, Cornell KK, Selcer BA. Pylorogastric intussusceptions in the dog: a case report and literature review. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001;37:238e43. [2] Applewhite AA, Cornell KK, Selcer BA. Diagnosis and treatment of intussusceptions in dogs. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet 2001;24:110e27. [3] Barreau P. Intussusception: Diagnosis and treatment. In: Procedings 33rd WSAVA & 14th FECAVA 2008 WSAVA Congress, August from 20 to 24, 2008, Dublin Ireland. p. 614, 2008.

L. Lideo et al. [4] Kleinschmidt S, Meneses F, Nolte I, Hewicker-Trautwein M. Retrospective study on the diagnostic value of full-thickness biopsies from the stomach and intestines of dogs with chronic gastrointestinal disease symptoms. Vet Pathol 2006;43: 1000e3. [5] Lamb CR, Mantis P. Ultrasonographic features of intestinal intussusception in 10 dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1998;39: 437e41. [6] Lee H, Yeon S, Lee H, et al. Ultrasonographic diagnosis-pylorogastric intussusceptions in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasoun 2005; 46:317e8. [7] Levitt L, Mauer MS. Intussusception in dogs and cats: a review of 36 cases. Can Vet J 1992;33:660e4. [8] Lidbury JA, Suchodolski JS, Steiner JM. Gastric histopathologic abnormalities in dogs: 67 cases (2002e2007). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007;234:1147e53. [9] Patsikas MN, Papazoglou LG, Jakovljevic S, Dessiris AK. Color Doppler ultrasonography in prediction of the reducibility of intussuscepted bowel in 15 young dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasoun 2005;46:313e6. [10] Patsikas MN, Jakovljevic S, Moustardas N, et al. Ultrasonographic signs of intestinal intussusceptions associated with acute enteritis or gastroenteritis in 19 young dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2003;39:57e66. [11] Patsikas MN, Papazoglou LG, Papaioannou NG, et al. Ultrasonographic findings of intestinal intussusceptions in seven cats. J Feline Med Surg 2003;5:335e43. [12] Petra M, Gentilini F, Pinna S, et al. Intermittent gastroesophageal intussusception in a dog: clinical features, radiographic and endoscopic findings and surgical management. Vet Res Commun 2003;27:783e6. [13] Washabau RJ. Gastrointestinal motility disorders and gastrointestinal prokinetic therapy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2003;33:1007e28. [14] Watson PJ. Gastroduodenal intussusception in a young dog. J Small Anim Prac 1997;38:163e7. [15] Webb C, Twedt DC. Canine gastritis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2003;33:969e85.