SHOULD ANTICOAGULATION THERAPY BE COMBINED WITH DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION?

SHOULD ANTICOAGULATION THERAPY BE COMBINED WITH DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION?

E264 JACC March 27, 2012 Volume 59, Issue 13 ACC-i2 with TCT SHOULD ANTICOAGULATION THERAPY BE COMBINED WITH DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PATIENTS WI...

105KB Sizes 1 Downloads 70 Views

E264 JACC March 27, 2012 Volume 59, Issue 13

ACC-i2 with TCT SHOULD ANTICOAGULATION THERAPY BE COMBINED WITH DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION FOLLOWING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION? i2 Poster Contributions McCormick Place South, Hall A Saturday, March 24, 2012, 9:30 a.m.-Noon

Session Title: Adjunct Pharmacology Abstract Category: 21. Pharmacotherapy - Interventional Aspects Presentation Number: 2536-596 Authors: Kay Woon Ho, Joan Ivanov, Peter Seidelin, Christopher Overgaard, mark osten, Eric Horlick, Douglas Ing, Karen Mackie, Vladmir Dzavik, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada Background: The role for warfarin combined with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is unclear. We conducted a single centre, retrospective study to examine cerebrovascular ischemic events and bleeding risk in nonvalvular AF patients post PCI, who were treated with DAPT vs. DAPT+warfarin (triple therapy, TT) to determine the optimal medical regimen. Methods: Nonvalvular AF patients who underwent PCI from 2000 to 2009 were identified from hospitalization and PCI databases. Patient clinical characteristics, CHADS2 score, PCI details, antithrombotic therapy and its duration were recorded. Clinical outcomes were obtained from hospital records, death registries and administrative databases. Primary composite endpoint was death, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Secondary endpoints included bleeding and blood transfusion (BT) rates. Results: There were 602 patients included; 220 given DAPT and 382 TT. Duration of DAPT/TT was 5.9±5.0 months (5.8±5.0 months for TT, 6.1±4.9 months for DAPT). Baseline patient characteristics were similar except for higher CHADS2 (2.6 vs 2.1), driven by older age (72.9 vs 70.5 years), more heart failure (49.2% vs 36.9%) and higher previous stroke rate (14.4% vs 6.4%) in TT group. In view of higher CHADS2 in TT group, we stratified cerebrovascular ischaemic events by low (≤2) and high (>2) CHADS2 scores. High CHADS2 was associated with more primary outcomes regardless of TT or DAPT therapy (O.R. 1.585, C.I. 1.225 - 2.050). There was no difference in primary outcome with TT vs DAPT use in low or high CHADS2 groups, but more gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds occurred with TT use (2.6% vs 0.5%, p<0.05). There were no differences in major bleeding or BT rates between groups. Conclusions: The use of TT compared to DAPT was not associated with reduction in cerebrovascular ischaemic events in nonvalvular AF patients post PCI regardless of CHADS2 score. There was a 5-fold increase in GI bleed with TT use. These results suggest exercising caution when using TT in nonvalvular AF patients post PCI. DAPT alone may be safer and does not appear to be associated with increased stroke rate.