Accepted Manuscript Social Support as a Mediator of Physical Disability and Depressive Symptoms in Chinese Elderly
Hui Xie, Wenjia Peng, Yang Yang, Dan Zhang, Yaoyao Sun, Menglian Wu, Jie Zhang, Jihui Jia, Yonggang Su PII: DOI: Reference:
S0883-9417(17)30288-1 doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2017.11.012 YAPNU 51025
To appear in:
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
Received date: Accepted date:
5 June 2017 5 November 2017
Please cite this article as: Hui Xie, Wenjia Peng, Yang Yang, Dan Zhang, Yaoyao Sun, Menglian Wu, Jie Zhang, Jihui Jia, Yonggang Su , Social Support as a Mediator of Physical Disability and Depressive Symptoms in Chinese Elderly. The address for the corresponding author was captured as affiliation for all authors. Please check if appropriate. Yapnu(2017), doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2017.11.012
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Social Support as a Mediator of Physical Disability and Depressive Symptoms in Chinese Elderly
Hui Xie, MS
PT
Doctoral Student, School of Nursing, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong,
RI
China, Phone: (86)013855210738. E-mail:
[email protected]
SC
Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233030, Anhui, China, Phone: (86)5523178522
NU
Wenjia Peng, PhD
MA
Lecturer, Preventive Medicine department, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233030, Anhui, China. E-mail:
[email protected]
D
Yang Yang, MS
PT E
Doctoral Student, School of Nursing, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China. E-mail:
[email protected]
CE
Dan Zhang, MS
AC
Doctoral Student, School of Nursing, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China. E-mail:
[email protected] Yaoyao Sun, MS
School of Nursing, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China. E-mail:
[email protected] Menglian Wu, MS School of Nursing, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China. E-mail:
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[email protected] Jie Zhang, PhD Professor, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China.
PT
Professor, Department of Sociology, State University of New York Buffalo State,
RI
Buffalo, New York, USA. E-mail:
[email protected]
SC
Jihui Jia, PhD
Professor, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China. E-mail:
NU
[email protected]
MA
Yonggang Su, PhD
Associate Professor, School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong
PT E
D
University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China. E-mail:
[email protected]
Correspondence: Yonggang Su, PhD, School of Foreign Languages and Literature,
CE
Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, P. R. China. Telephone:
AC
(86)53188382034; FAX: (86) 53188382034 .e-mail:
[email protected]
Acknowledgements: We thank all the participants who volunteered to share data and peers who helped to proofread the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Funding: This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of China [grant numbers 14YJAZH068]; and Shandong Province Science and Technology
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Department [grant number 2015ZDXX0801A01].
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Social Support as a Mediator of Physical Disability and Depressive Symptoms in Chinese Elderly
Abstract
PT
The relationship between physical disability and depressive symptoms has been
RI
associated with social support. Different aspects of social support may play distinct
SC
roles in health-related quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine the mediation of social support in the relationship between physical disability and
NU
depressive symptoms among old people in Mainland China. Subjective support and
MA
utilization of support mediated the relationship between ADL and depressive symptoms, with the indirect effect of subjective support and utilization of support at
D
0.038 and 0.030 respectively (the total effect was 0.180). Subjective support was
PT E
negatively associated with depressive symptoms in independent elderly people, utilization of support was negatively associated with depressive symptoms in partially
CE
dependent elderly people, and utilization of support had a greater association with
AC
geriatric depressive symptoms than subjective support in severely dependent elderly people. Social support mechanism and positive psychological intervention should be established and introduced in accordance with the physical disability of the elderly people, to protect them from depressive symptoms.
Keywords: social support; mediator; activities of daily living (ADL); elderly; depressive symptoms
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Social Support as a Mediator of Physical Disability and Depressive Symptoms in Chinese Elderly
Introduction
PT
Researches reveal that geriatric depressive symptoms have become a public health
RI
problem with the gradual aging of the population (Lino et al., 2014). In China, the
SC
population aged 60 and above has reached 200 million, and will increase to 400 million within 10 years (Lu & Li, 2015). The prevalence of depressive symptoms in
NU
old people in China is on the rise, as reported by urban researches and rural-based
MA
studies, with rates varying from 5.91% to 54.3% (Li et al., 2015; Jee & Lee, 2013). Depressive symptoms are associated with a negative socio-economic impact, such as
D
poverty, family disruption, emotional suffering, increased medical care expenses, and
PT E
mortality (Alexopoulos, 2005).
CE
Physical disability, considered as the inability or diminished capacity to perform basic self-care tasks, undermines a person's ability to interact with the physical and
AC
social environment, hence increasing the risk of depressive symptoms (Bruce, 2001). Increased disability in activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) have been proven to be connected with depressive symptoms (Bowen & Ruch, 2015; Hybels, Pieper, & Blazer, 2009). Failure to carry out ADL had been positively associated with depressive symptoms in elderly people (Newsom & Schulz, 1996) and physical disability accounted for incidences of depressive symptoms in the elderly (Kennedy, Kelman, & Thomas, 1990). Furthermore, that 1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT physical disability led to increased geriatric depressive symptoms over time has been supported by longitudinal researches (Lin & Wu, 2011). Given the influence of physical disability and depressive symptoms on the well-being of the elderly, it is
PT
urgent to find ways to deal with them.
Social support, defined as a range of supports accessible to an individual through
RI
his social interactions with other individuals (Cooke, Rossmann, Mccubbin, &
SC
Patterson, 1988), has received a great amount of attention for its function on
NU
alleviating or mediating the stress of life on mental health (Newsom & Schulz, 1996). It has been proved that social support can help to prevent negative effects of physical
MA
disability on mental health (Wan et al., 2013). Different dimensions of social support may play different roles in safeguarding health-related quality of life (Tang, Brown,
PT E
D
Funnell, & Anderson, 2008). Social support can be divided into objective support, subjective support, and utilization of support, based on its nature (Xiao, 1994).
CE
Objective support refers to actual or visible support, including material aids, the availability of and participation in social networks, and team relations (Xiao, 1994).
AC
Subjective support, also known as perceived social support, refers to the experience of and, the degree of satisfaction with being understood, respected, and supported. Utilization of support is defined as the degree to which the available support is used (Xiao, 1994). Perceived social support or subjective support, compared with objective support, acts as a significant stress reducer and has been found more significantly related to depressive symptoms, and effective in mediating the relationship between disability and depressive symptoms (Taylor & Lynch, 2004; Yang, 2006). 2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Nevertheless, Krause found received social support to be generally protective against the effects of stressors for the elderly (Krause, 1986). Overall, relatively few studies discussed the effects of objective support, subjective support, and utilization of support as mediators in the relation between physical disability and depressive
PT
symptoms in Asian elderly. The influence of utilization of support on ADL and
RI
depressive symptoms in elderly people has been especially rarely researched on.
SC
Social support is typically conceptualized as one category of coping resource, while
NU
physical disability as a kind of chronic stressor (Verbrugge & Allan, 1994). Studies on life stress suggest that the effectiveness of any coping resource may depend on
MA
properties of the stressor (Thoits, 1995). So, it is necessary to examine what dimensions of social support associate with depressive symptoms in different ADL.
PT E
D
The current study aimed to examine whether the relationship between physical disability and depressive symptoms can be mediated by social support among old
CE
people in Mainland China, and, if possible, to explore the role of objective support, subjective support, and utilization of support in relation to depressive symptoms in
AC
elderly people with different levels of ADL. This study first hypothesized that physical disability was associated with greater depressive symptoms (H1). Then, with the impairment of ADL as a stressor, this study also hypothesized that three dimensions of social support could mediate the relationship between ADL and depressive symptoms (H2) among Chinese elderly (seen in Figure 1). Furthermore, the present study specifically examined whether subjective support and utilization of support significantly were associated with 3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT depressive symptoms more effectively than objective support (H3) was. The findings of the present research will be enlightening to identify the mediate effect of social support in affecting depressive symptoms, and will hopefully promote the mental health service in community medical centers.
RI
Depressive Symptoms
SC
Mediating Effect H2
PT
H1 (–)
Physical Disability (ADL)
MA
NU
Social Support Objective Support (H3a) Subjective Support (H3b) Utilization of Support (H3c)
PT E
Materials and Methods
D
Figure 1. Theoretical model (H=hypothesis).
Participants
CE
A cross-sectional study was performed over 10 months in 2014 – 2015 with a
AC
convenience sample of 372 elderly adults qualified to participate from three community health centers in Bengbu, a medium-sized city in Anhui Province of China, . These participants met the study criteria: (1) the age (elderly 60 years of age and over, based on the reference set by the United Nations), (2) permanent local residents, (3) voluntary participation, and (4) ability to communicate in Chinese. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) documented with severe cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination score < 24) (Folstein, Folstein, & McHugh, 1975), (2)
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT a terminal prognosis, and (3) impaired reality (e.g., severe hearing impairment, diagnosis of paranoia). In the process of recruitment, invitations were handed out to 419 families to invite eligible elderly people to participate in the research. Of these eligible referrals, 11%
PT
declined the invitation, mainly owing to lack of time or interest. Therefore, a sum of
SC
RI
372 elderly people signed the informed consent and participated in the research.
Ethic statement
NU
The study (NO. 2014-25) was approved and granted permission by the Ethics
MA
Committee of Bengbu Medical College. All the participants were notified of the aim of the study and their right to attend or quit the investigation voluntarily, and they
D
were provided with written informed consent agreements prior to the initiation of the
PT E
study. During the research process, researchers ensured that participants’ private
CE
information would be kept secret, and that only aggregate data would be reported.
AC
Measurements
Depressive symptoms. The primary outcome variable, depressive symptoms of elderly people, was measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale-Long Form 30, which consists of 30 self-rating questions with “yes” or “no” options and a depressive symptoms-related score ranging from 0 to 30. A higher score suggests the presence of elevated depressive symptoms (Yesavage et al., 1982). The scale was particularly employed in monitoring and assessing the severity of depressive symptoms and has
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT shown good reliability and validity (Liu et al., 2013). Cronbach’s α for the current sample was 0.724. Physical disability. The older adults’ physical disability was measured via the ADL Scale, including ADL subscales (Katz et al., 1963) and IADL subscales (Lawton &
PT
Brody, 1969). The ADL subscale assesses six types of ability: bathing, feeding,
RI
dressing, transferring, toileting, and continence. The IADL subscale evaluates the
SC
ability to perform eight types of more complex activities, like telephone using, transportation and shopping. Scores for performing activities range from 1 to 4 (1
NU
point for each activity performed without help and 4 points for each activity that the
MA
individual is unable to perform). The maximum score is 56 (higher scores indicating greater dependence). Edwards confirmed the ADL scales in a Brazilian study,
D
showing a Cronbach’s α of 0.96 - 0.99 (Edwards, 1990). The elderly were grouped
PT E
into three categories in accordance with degrees of dependence: independent (< 16 points), partially dependent (16–22 points), and severely dependent (a total score of >
CE
22 or more than two items with scores of ≥ 3) (Zhang & He, 2015). Cronbach’s α for
AC
the current sample was 0.93. Social support. Social support was evaluated by using the Social Support Rating Scale (Xiao, 1994), which has been widely used among different populations in China (Ma et al.,2015; Ke, Liu & Li, 2010). The Cronbach’s α and the validity are both satisfactory (Ma et al., 2015). It was examined from three dimensions: objective support (3 items), subjective support (4 items), and utilization of support (3 items). The total score of social support and scores for the objective, subjective, and
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT utilization of support subscales range from 12 to 66, 1 to 22, 8 to 32, and 3 to 12, respectively. A higher score predicts more social support. The Cronbach’s α value for the whole scale and the three subscales in the study were 0.83, 0.86, 0.80, and 0.79, respectively. characteristics.
The socio-demographic characteristics
PT
Socio-demographic
RI
included gender, age, education level, marital status, residential status, chronic
SC
diseases (including hypertension, diabetes, coronary disease, cerebrovascular disease,
NU
osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis), and average monthly income.
MA
Data collection
Ethics approval was obtained from the three community health centers. Following
D
participant enrollment, data were elicited via interviews with the elderly people
PT E
conducted by researchers and research assistants trained in this respect and with bachelor’s degrees. The researchers and research assistants acquired the consent from
CE
the elderly people who were willing to participate and paid visits to the homes of
AC
these participants. The survey took 30 to 40 minutes, in the process of which the questionnaires were checked and the missing item responses were reconfirmed. Records of the diagnoses of chronic diseases were collected from patient charts.
Data analysis Data were double-entered by using the EpiData 3.1 software (EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark) and multiple logic checks were used to ensure quality. Statistical
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT analyses were conducted by using SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were calculated to determine the distribution of the socio-demographic factors, number of chronic diseases, and residential status, and to calculate the prevalence proportions. The mean ( X ) and standard deviation (SD) were
PT
calculated for the scores of social support, ADL, and depressive symptoms. One-way
RI
analysis of variance was used to analyze continuous variables with the
SC
Student-Newman-Keuls test or independent t-test for post hoc multiple comparisons. The Pearson correlation coefficient was applied to measure the correlations between
NU
ADL, social support, and depressive symptoms.
MA
Multiple linear regression analysis was then performed to discover the contributions of ADL and social support to depressive symptoms. The depressive
D
symptoms score was the dependent variable. The mediation effect was checked by
PT E
using Model 4 in the PROCESS program (Hayes, 2013), with the depressive symptoms as an outcome, and social support as a mediator. Finally, three individual
CE
linear regression models were conducted by examining the relation between the type
AC
of social support and physical disability status (i.e., independent group, partially dependent group, severely dependent group). The significance level was set at 0.05.
Results Table 1 displays the socio-demographic and depressive symptoms data for the sample. The age of the participants ranged from 60 to 93 ( X = 71.7; SD = 6.2), and 47.3% were male, 64.5% married, 71.2% on a low level of income (< 1500 RMB), and
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 65.5% at the education level lower than elementary (primary) school. Furthermore, 75.3% lived with a spouse, and 16.7% lived on their own. Of the elderly people, 65.3% had one or two chronic diseases, including hypertension, diabetes, coronary disease, cerebrovascular disease, osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis.
PT
The study compared participants in terms of the variables of age, gender,
RI
educational level, residential status, marital status, average monthly income, and
SC
number of chronic diseases in relation to depressive symptoms. Gender, age, and number of chronic diseases did not significantly differ from each other in relation to
NU
depressive symptoms. Education level was significant for the scores of depressive
MA
symptoms; post hoc multiple comparisons indicated that depressive symptoms were significantly higher among those with elementary school education or less. In addition,
D
single, widowed, and/or divorced participants scored significantly higher in
PT E
depressive symptoms than married participants. Lastly, the participants whose average monthly income was < 1500 RMB had significantly higher scores of depressive
CE
symptoms compared with the participants with an average monthly income of ≥ 1500
AC
RMB. Although the number of chronic diseases does not produce significant influence, the elderly people with three or four chronic diseases had higher depressive symptoms scores than those with one or two chronic diseases (See Table 1). Table 2 illustrates the correlation coefficients among ADL, social support, three dimensions of social support, and depressive symptoms. The ADL and depressive symptoms were positively correlated (r = 0.226, P < 0.01), indicating that greater dependence of ADL in elderly people was positively relative to the higher level of
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT depressive symptoms. Likewise, social support, objective support, subjective support, utilization of support, and depressive symptoms were negatively correlated (r = -0.369, -0.219, -0.340, -0.304, P < 0.01), suggesting that higher level of social support, objective support, subjective support, and utilization of support was positively relative
PT
to the lower level of depressive symptoms. Lastly, the study discovered a negative
RI
correlation between social support and ADL (r = -0.268, P < 0.01). Similarly, three
SC
dimensions of social support were negative correlation with ADL (r = -0.122, P < 0.05; -0.261, P < 0.01; -0.246, P < 0.01), indicating that greater dependence of ADL
NU
were relative to the lower level of objective support, subjective support, and
MA
utilization of support.
Socio-demographic factors that were significantly affecting depressive symptoms
D
were included in the multiple linear regression analysis. Thus, the education level,
PT E
marital status, residential status, and monthly income were regarded as confounding variables. With these variables were being controlled, the results (Table 3, R2 = 0.244,
CE
F = 11.673, P < 0.05) indicated that, as predicted (H1), ADL was positively associated
AC
with depressive symptoms (β = 0.171, P < 0.01), and lower dependence of daily functioning was associated with lower depressive symptoms among elderly people. In the regression model, subjective support (β = -0.220, P < 0.001) and utilization of support (β= -0.193, P < 0.001) were negatively associated with lower depressive symptoms among elderly people (H3b, H3c), while subjective support (β = -0.220) was more negatively associated with depressive symptoms than ADL (β = 0.171) and utilization of support (β = -0.193). However, objective support was not significant (β
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT = 0.002, P = 0.979) in the study (H3a). The mediation effect is presented in Table 4. The indirect and direct effects of ADL and social support on depressive symptoms were studied with the usage of the SPSS macro created by Hayes (Hayes, 2013), which was conducted by means of
PT
bootstrapping strategy. Residential status and monthly income were set as covariates.
RI
The result showed that the overall models were significant (R2 = 0.149, 0.244, F =
SC
16.070, 16.779, P < 0.05).
Before social support was entered into the equation, impairment of ADL was
NU
strongly associated with depressive symptoms (B = 0.179, P < 0.01), whereas this
MA
effect was to be reduced (mediated to 0.112) by subjective support and utilization of support (B = -0.338, -0.548, P < 0.01, see Table 4). In this partial mediation model,
D
the indirect effect of subjective support and utilization of support were 0.038
PT E
(-0.112*-0.338) and 0.030 (-0.054*-0.548) respectively. The total effect was 0.180 (0.112 + 0.038 + 0.030). Consistent with prediction (H2), the results manifested that
CE
subjective support and utilization of support could mediate the relationship between
AC
ADL and depressive symptoms while objective support could not (Figure 2). It is important to notice that this is a partial mediating effect. Finally, multivariate linear regression models were applied to distinguish the contribution of objective support, subjective support, and utilization of support to the explained variance for physical disability. With the confounding demographic variables being controlled, it was revealed that in the independent elderly people, subjective support was negatively associated with depressive symptoms significantly
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (β = -0.215, P < 0.05). Utilization of support was negatively associated with depressive symptoms (β = -0.221, P < 0.05) in the partially dependent elderly people. In the severely dependent elderly people, subjective support and utilization of support were negatively associated with depressive symptoms, and utilization of support (β =
PT
-0.330, P < 0.05) had a greater association with geriatric depressive symptoms than
SC
RI
subjective support (β = -0.285, P < 0.05, see Table 5).
Discussion
NU
The research simultaneously investigated the associations between ADL, social
MA
support, and depressive symptoms in elderly people, to examine whether objective support, subjective support, and utilization of support mediated the relationship
D
between ADL and depressive symptoms. This study also took into account covariates,
PT E
such as residential status and monthly income, which could possibly confound the relations among physical disability, social support, and depressive symptoms. In
CE
addition, by discovering the roles in which objective support, subjective support, and
AC
utilization of support played when they are associated with depressive symptoms, the study contributed to the understanding of the impact of different levels of ADL in elderly people.
It was found that subjective support and utilization of support were effective as a mediator between ADL and depressive symptoms. Subjective support was negatively associated with depressive symptoms significantly in the independent elderly people, utilization of support was negatively associated with depressive symptoms in the
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT partially dependent elderly people, and utilization of support had a greater association with depressive symptoms in the severely dependent elderly people than subjective support did.
PT
Effects of ADL and social support on depressive symptoms
RI
The results demonstrated that impairment of ADL had a significant effect on
SC
depressive symptoms in the elderly, conforming with the findings of previous studies showing a relationship between activity limitations and psycho-social problems
NU
(Bowen & Ruch, 2015; Hybels, Pieper, & Blazer, 2009). Social support was found a
MA
positive association with depressive symptoms, and higher levels of depressive symptoms were closely related to lower levels of social support, as in some previous
D
studies (Lewin, Jöbges & Werheid, 2013; Lino et al., 2013; Aksüllü & Doğan, 2004).
PT E
Furthermore, this research discovered that subjective support and utilization of support play a role as a mediator between ADL and depressive symptoms. That is,
CE
when mediated by subjective support and utilization of support, less impairment of
AC
ADL is related to fewer depressive symptoms. Thus, it is important to notice the function of subjective support and utilization of support in relieving the negative consequences of ADL on depressive symptoms, which helps to understand the relative effectiveness of different dimension of social support as mediator in the relation between physical disability and depressive symptoms. In the case of physical disability characterized with slow rehabilitation, subjective support and utilization of support provide emotional comfort and positively affect elderly’ understanding and
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT utilization of social contact and appraisals (Yang, 2006). The sense of security for knowing that tangible assistance is available (Newsom & Schulz, 1996), together with the ability of utilization of available support, can ease distress and ameliorate depressive symptoms.
PT
The finding that subjective support and utilization of support played a role as a
RI
mediator between ADL and depressive symptoms has important implications for care
SC
workers since social support is more amenable to manage. The participants in the present study were on a lower-income (71.2% had a monthly income of < 1500 RMB)
NU
and lower-education level (65.5% had elementary school education or less), and
MA
16.7% lived independently and 34.7% had three or four chronic diseases. The level of subjective support and utilization of support of the elderly people with less income
D
and poorer education was lower than that of those with higher income and higher
PT E
educational level since a higher average income can better meet material needs and, secure higher social status, indicating greater adaptability, self-adjustment, and utility
CE
of social support (Ma et al., 2015). Improving the perception of social relationships,
AC
strengthening ties with confidants, and especially improving the utilization of existing support, are more effective than providing other means of support in reducing risks for depression in elderly. It is also important to notice that this is a partial mediating effect, implying that those who have impairment of ADL will tend to develop depressive symptoms when they have no access to enough social support, but other mediating factors may get involved.
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Impact of subjective support, objective support, and utilization of support against depressive symptoms in elderly people with different levels of ADL An interesting discovery in this study is that subjective support was negatively
PT
associated with depressive symptoms in independent elderly people, utilization of
RI
support was negatively associated with depressive symptoms in partially dependent
SC
elderly people, and utilization of support had a greater association with depressive symptoms than subjective support in severely dependent elderly people.
NU
For independent elderly people, lower subjective support inferred lower level of
MA
satisfaction with social support (Ke, Liu, & Li, 2010). In a collectivistic culture, people prioritize group loyalty, cooperation and sense of belonging instead of
D
individualism, social support is assumed as a matter of course (Hogg & Vaughan,
PT E
2003). Chinese filial piety also advocates respecting and helping the elderly, when social support (objective support) for elder people can be taken as natural and may not
CE
get enough appreciation, and may not buffer the effects of pressures (such as
AC
disabilities) (Bozo, Toksabay, & Kürüm, 2009). The perceived reality is the psychological reality, which is an actual (intermediary) variable affecting people’s behavior and development (Thoits, 1983). Consequently, subjective support, a mediator variable that can influence personal behavior (Thoits, 1983), significantly predicted depressive symptoms more than actual or visible support in the independent elderly people. For the partially dependent and severely dependent elderly people, the inability to
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT care for oneself might produce negative psychosocial influences, such as lower self-esteem, loss of perceived control, social activity restriction (Lenze, Rogers, & Martire, 2001) and inadequate positive evaluation of social support, which increases the requirement for social support and the susceptibility to depressive symptoms
PT
(Alexopoulos, 2005), but decreases the utilization of support. A possible explanation
RI
is that older people with physical disability are less likely to use support efficiently or
SC
actively even when they are offered much support. Furthermore, another reason might be related to the influence of Asian culture that emphasizes social harmony so that
NU
people can be dubious whether the pursuit of support might break the balanced
MA
distribution of resources in the community or burden the social networks (Chen, Hicks, & While, 2014). This necessitates a possible intervention that promotes the
D
recognition of, and training in, the utilization of support, particularly for the
PT E
partially dependent and severely dependent elderly people in the community. This study has twofold significance for health professionals. First, the concepts of
CE
social support should be clearly defined, and further researches are needed with more
AC
samples to measure the features of social support, including the amount, specific types and forms of utilization. Second, the mechanism of social support and positive psychological interventions should be established, to cater to physical disability of elderly individuals and to improve their psychological health as well.
Limitations A couple of limitations can be potential in this study. Firstly, the study only examined
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT senior citizens as community residents, which was a restriction to the universality of its findings, while the rates of depressive symptoms were higher among institutionalized older people and hospitalized older persons. Therefore, the findings may not be generalized to apply to different subgroups of older people. Social support,
PT
in particular, may function differently in these subgroups. Secondly, cross-sectional
RI
analysis of this observational study cannot provide direct causal evidence; thus,
SC
further experimental or longitudinal studies are necessary to facilitate an evaluation of
NU
causality.
MA
Conclusion
The present study provides evidence that social support relieves the passive effects of
D
ADL on the occurrence of depressive symptoms among elderly people. This is helpful
PT E
for planning a possible avenue of preventive measures and for improving knowledge on the disposal of depressive symptoms, consequently constructive for promoting
CE
social support in community elderly population. Furthermore, the study, by exploring
AC
the roles that subjective support, objective support, and utilization of support play in preventing depressive symptoms, contributes to the understanding of the impact of different levels of ADL on elderly people. The mechanism of social support and positive psychological intervention should be established to protect elderly people from depressive symptoms.
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT References: Aksüllü, N., & Doğan, S. (2004). Relationship of Social Support and Depression in Institutionalized and Non-institutionalized Elderly. Anatolian J Psychiatry, 5, 76-84.
Alexopoulos, G. S. (2005). Depression in the Elderly. The lancet, 36(5), 1961-1970. Bowen, M. E., & Ruch, A. (2015). Depressive Symptoms and Disability Risk Among Older White and Latino Adults by Nativity Status. J Aging Health, 27(7), 1286-1305. Bozo, O., Toksabay, N. E., & Kürüm, O. (2009). Activities of Daily Living, Depression, and Social Support among Elderly Turkish People. J Psy, 143(2), 193-205.
PT
Bruce, M. L. (2001). Depression and Disability in Late life: Directions for Future Research. Am J Geriat Psychiat, 9, 102-112. Chen, Y., Hicks, A., & While, A. E. (2014). Loneliness and Social Support of Older People Living
RI
Alone in a County of Shanghai, China. Health Soc Care Community, 22(4), 429-438. Cooke, B. D., Rossmann, M. M., Mccubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1988). Examining the Definition
SC
and Assessment of Social Support: a Resource for Individuals and Families. Fam Relat, 37(2), 211-216.
Edwards, M. M. (1990). The Reliability and Validity of Self-report Activities of Daily Living Scales.
NU
Can J Occup Ther, 57(5), 273-278.
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). ‘‘Mini-mental state’’: a Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician. J Psychiatr Res, 12, 189-198.
MA
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, New York, The Guilford Press.
Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2003). Social Psychology. London, Sage. Hybels, C. F., Pieper, C. F., & Blazer, D. G. (2009). The Complex Relationship between Depressive
D
Symptoms and Functional Limitations in Community-dwelling Older Adults: the Impact of Subthreshold Depression. Psycho Med, 39(10), 1677-1688.
PT E
Jee, Y. J., & Lee, Y. B. (2013). Factors Influencing Depression among Elderly Patients in Geriatric Hospitals. J Phys Ther Sci, 25(11), 1445-1449. Katz, S., Ford, A. B., Moskowitz, R. W., Jackson, B. A., & Jaffe, M. W. (1963). Studies of Illness in the Aged. The Index of ADL: a Standardized Measure of Biological and Psychosocial Function.
CE
JAMA, 185, 914-919.
AC
Kennedy, G. J., Kelman, H. R., & Thomas, C. (1990). The Emergence of Depressive Symptoms in Late Life: The Importance of Declining Health and Increasing Disability. J Commun Health, 15, 93-104. Ke, X., Liu, C. J., & Li, N. X. (2010). Social Support and Quality of Life: a Cross-sectional Study on Survivors Eight Months after the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. BMC Public Health, 10, 1-11.
Krause, N. (1986). Social Support, Stress, and Well-being among Older Adults. J Gerontol, 41, 512-519. Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of Older People: Self-maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Gerontologist, 9, 179-186. Lenze, E. J., Rogers, J. C., & Martire, L. M. (2001). The Association of Late-life Depression and Anxiety with Physical Disability: a Review of the Literature and Prospectus for Future Research. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 9(2), 113-135. Lewin, A., Jöbges, M., & Werheid, K. (2013). The Influence of Self-efficacy, Pre-stroke Depression and Perceived Social Support on Self-reported Depressive Symptoms during Stroke Rehabilitation.
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Neuropsychol Reha, 23(4), 546-562. Li, J. K., Wu, H. T., Sun, G. N., Chen, X. Y., & Wang, C. P. (2015). The Quality of Life and Depression Status of the Left-behind Elderly among Rural Areas in Shandong Province. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 19(9), 897-900.
Lin, I., & Wu, H. (2011). Does Informal Care Attenuate the Cycle of ADL/IADL Disability and Depressive Symptoms in Late Life? J Gerontol, 66B, 585-594. Lino, V. T., Portela, M. C., Camacho, L. A., Atie, S., & Lima, M. J. (2013). Assessment of Social Support and Its Association to Depression, Self-perceived Health and Chronic Diseases in Elderly Individuals Residing in an Area of Poverty and Social Vulnerability in Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil.
PT
PLoS ONE, 8, 1-7.
Lino, V. T., Portela, M. C., Camacho, L. A., Atie, S., Lima, M. J., Rodrigues, N. C., Barros, M. B., &
RI
Andrade, M. K. (2014). Screening for Depression in Low-Income Elderly Patients at the Primary Care Level: Use of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. PLoS ONE, 9(12), 1-10.
SC
Liu, J., Wang, Y., Wang, X. H., Song, R. H., & Yi, X. H. (2013). Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Geriatric Depression Scale among Chinese Urban Community-dwelling Elderly Population. Chin J Clinic Psycho, 21(1), 39-41.
NU
Lu, P. P., Li, & H. Y. (2015). Study on the Differences of the Caring Demands and Abilities of the Elderly in Different Caring Modes. J Chin Gen Pract, 18(15), 1780-1785. Ma, L. N., Li, Y., Wang, J. Y., Zhu, H., Yang, W., Cao, R. J., Qian, Y. Y., & Feng, M. (2015). Quality
MA
of Life Is Related to Social Support in Elderly Osteoporosis Patients in a Chinese Population. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 1-10.
Ma, W. K., Kang, D. M., Song, Y. P., et al. (2015). Social Support and HIV/STDs Infections among a Probability-based Sample of Rural Married Migrant Women in Shandong Province, China. BMC
D
Public Health, 15, 1-11.
PT E
Newsom, J. T., & Schulz, T. (1996). Social Support as a Mediator in the Relation between Functional Status and Quality of Life in Older Adults. Psychol Aging, 11, 34-44. Tang, T. S., Brown, M. B., Funnell, M. M., & Anderson, R. M. (2008). Social Support, Quality of Life, and Self-care Behaviors among African Americans with type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Educ, 34(2), 266-276.
CE
Taylor, M. G., & Lynch, S. M. (2004). Trajectories of Impairment, Social Support, and Depressive Symptoms in Late Life. J Gerontol, 59B, 238-246. Thoits, P. A. (1983). Dimensions of Life Events that Influence Psychological Distress: an Evaluation
AC
and Synthesis of the Literature, in Psychological Stress: Trends in Theory and Research. Edited by Howard K. New York, Acadimic Press, 33-103.
Thoits, P. A. (1995). Stress, Coping, and Social Support Processes: Where Are We? What Next? J Health Soc Behavior, 35, 53-79. Verbrugge, L. M., & Allan, M. J. (1994). The Disablement Process. Soc Sci Med, 38, 1-14. Wan, M. A., Normah, C. D., Mahadir, A., et al. (2013). Loneliness and Depression among the Elderly in an Agricultural Settlement: Mediating Effects of Social Support. Asia Pac Psychiatry, 5, 134-139. Xiao, S. Y. (1994). The Theoretical Basis and Application of Social Support Questionnaire. J Clinic Psychol Med, 4, 98-100.
Yang, Y. (2006). How Does Functional Disability Affect Depressive Symptoms in Late Life? The Role of Perceived Social Support and Psychological Resources. J Health Soc Behav, 47,
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 355-372. Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., et al. (1982). Development and Validation of a Geriatric Depression Screening Scale: a Preliminary Report. J Psychiatr Res, 17(1), 37-49. Zhang, M. Y., & He, Y. L. (2015). Rating Scales for Mental Health. Changsha: Hunan Science &
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Technology Press, 268.
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table
1.
Comparison
of
depressive
symptoms
scores
among
different
socio-demographic variables Variables
N (%)
Depressive
F or t
P
symptoms score ( X ± SD)
176 (47.3)
10.80 ± 6.25
Female
196 (52.7)
11.16 ± 6.42
60 - 69
132 (35.5)
11.05 ± 7.02
70 - 79
137 (36.8)
11.22 ± 6.14
80 - 89
91 (24.5
≥ 90
12 (3.2)
11.76 ± 6.49
Junior or senior high school
101 (27.2)
9.74 ± 5.75
College or above
27 (7.3)
8.70 ± 5.86
240 (64.5)
10.40 ± 6.16
132 (35.5)
12.07 ± 6.52
62 (16.7)
13.21 ± 7.17
Living with spouse
280 (75.3)
10.75 ± 6.10
Living with others (children,
30 (8.0)
8.63 ± 5.43
< 1500
265 (71.2)
11.59 ± 6.43
≥ 1500
107 (28.8)
8.62 ± 5.43
132 (35.5)
10.44 ± 6.07
PT E
D
244 (65.5)
Married
CE
Single/widowed/divorced
0.996
5.655
0.004
-2.454
0.015
6.262
0.002
4.722
<0.001
1.546
0.202
10.25 ± 4.92
Elementary school or less
Marital status
0.021
10.65 ± 5.78
MA
Education level
0.577
NU
SC
Age group (years)
-0.559
RI
Male
PT
Gender
Residential status
AC
Living on their own
relatives, et al) Average monthly income (RMB)
Number of chronic diseases 1
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 111 (29.8)
10.59 ± 5.95
3
73 (19.6)
12.25 ± 6.49
4
56 (15.1)
11.45 ± 7.29
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
2
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2. Descriptive and Pearson Correlation Analysis Range
Mean
SD
2
3
4
5
6
1 ADL
14 ~ 56
20.79
9.76
-0.268**
-0.122*
-0.261**
-0.246**
0.226**
2 Social
18 ~ 53
35.03
7.44
-
0.794**
0.880**
0.628**
-0.369**
1 ~ 17
7.91
3.00
-
-
0.527**
0.323**
-0.219**
11 ~ 29
19.67
4.17
-
-
-
3 ~ 12
7.45
2.21
-
-
1 ~ 29
10.99
6.33
-
3 Objective
PT
support
0.359**
-0.340**
-
-
-0.304**
-
-
-
4 Subjective
RI
support
5 Utilization
6 Depressive
Note.
AC
CE
PT E
D
SD=Standard Deviation. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.
-
MA
symptoms
NU
of support
SC
support
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 3. Multiple linear regression Analysis on the depressive symptoms Dependent Variables:
Unstandardized
Standardized
Depressive Symptoms
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
SE
t
P
-0.341
0.733
β
Junior or senior high school
-0.257
0.753
-0.018
College or above
-0.457
1.326
-0.019
0.075
0.731
0.006
-0.345
0.730
0.103
0.918
-0.009
-0.137
0.891
-0.132
-2.384
0.018
RI
Marital status
PT
Education level (ref. elementary school or less)
SC
Residential status (ref. living on their own) -0.128
0.933
Living with others
-3.075
1.290
Average monthly income
-3.078
0.816
-0.220
-3.774
0.000
ADL
0.111
0.033
0.171
3.386
0.001
Objective support
0.003
0.119
0.002
0.027
0.979
Subjective support
-0.335
0.088
-0.220
-3.804
0.000
Utilization of support
-0.555
0.148
-0.193
-3.749
0.000
F
0.244 11.673*
CE
Ref=reference;
MA
D
PT E
R2
NU
Living with spouse
SE = Standard Error.
AC
* P < 0.05
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 4. Mediation Effect Analysis Based on PROCESS B
SE
t
P
LLCI
ULCI
Outcome: Depressive Symptoms ADL
0.179
0.032
5.646
0.000
0.117
0.242
-3.454
-0.179
Residential status (ref. living on their own) -1.817
0.833
-2.182
0.030
Living with others
-3.777
1.337
-2.825
0.005
-6.407
-1.148
-3.533
0.696
-5.075
0.000
-4.902
-2.164
R2
RI
Monthly income
PT
Living with spouse
SC
0.149
16.070*
F
0.000
0.119
0.003
0.997
-0.233
0.233
Subjective support
-0.338
0.087
-3.905
0.000
-0.508
-0.168
Utilization of support
-0.548
0.146
-3.764
0.000
-0.834
-0.262
ADL
0.112
0.032
3.530
0.001
0.050
0.174
-0.186
0.839
-0.222
0.825
-1.837
1.464
-3.082
1.273
-2.422
0.016
-5.585
-0.579
-3.276
0.669
-4.900
0.000
-4.590
-1.961
MA
Objective support
D
NU
Outcome: Depressive Symptoms
Living with spouse Living with others
CE
Monthly income R2
0.244 16.779*
AC
F Note:
PT E
Residential status (ref. living on their own)
SE = Standard Error;
LLCI = Lower Limit Confidence Interval; ULCI = Upper Limit Confidence Interval; Ref=reference; * P < 0.05.
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 5. Multivariate linear regression models to identify the predictors of depressive symptoms scores and the contribution of each predictor to the explained variance for different physical disability Independent group B (SE)
β
Partially dependent group P
B (SE)
β
P
0.006
0.954
-0.113
senior high
-0.148
-0.011
0.900
(1.175)
0.082
(1.969)
Marital
-2.001
status
(1.361)
0.850
-0.197
0.947
-0.298
(2.948) -0.124
0.143
0.006
1.224
-0.007
NU
above
0.017
0.080
0.952
(1.320)
MA
0.372
(1.396)
(1.408)
school College or
RI
or
B (SE)
SC
Education level (ref. elementary school or less) Junior
Severely dependent group
PT
Variable
β
P
-0.008
0.935
-0.013
0.897
0.101
0.333
-0.073
0.551
-0.136
0.267
-0.241
0.031
0.124
0.265
-0.285
0.014
-0.330
0.001
(2.298)
(1.257)
1.540
with
(1.627)
spouse 1.999
with others
(2.689)
Average
-2.542
monthly
(1.319)
AC
income
0.063
CE
Living
0.091
Objective
-0.329
support
(0.177)
Subjective
-0.321
support
(0.126)
Utilization
-0.206
of support
(0.227)
0.345
-0.377
(1.708)
0.458
-8.369
PT E
Living
D
Residential status (ref. living on their own)
-0.192
-0.165
0.056
-0.029
0.826
(1.617)
-0.390
0.000
(2.196) -2.701
0.183
-0.175
0.095
0.012
-0.291
0.092
0.407
0.365
-0.653 (0.297)
0.280 (0.249)
-0.190
0.108
(0.179) -0.073
-3.035 (1.384)
(0.220) -0.215
-2.387 (2.137)
(1.603)
0.066
-0.967
-0.450 (0.179)
-0.221
0.030
-0.910 (0.258)
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT SE = Standard Error
PT
Objective support
0.000
Subjective support
0.112
NU
ADL
-0.054
Depressive symptoms
-0.548
MA
Utilization of support
-0.338
SC
-0.112
RI
-0.039
D
Figure 2. The estimation of the mediation effect of social support in affecting ADL
PT E
and depressive symptoms among the elderly in China. (N = 372).
AC
CE
Note. Residential status and Monthly income were controlled as covariates.
27