12 Years of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Eastern Saxony – Correlation with an unscreened German population

12 Years of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Eastern Saxony – Correlation with an unscreened German population

2. Screening & Diagnosis S9 30 12 Years of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Eastern Saxony − Correlation with an unscreened German population...

50KB Sizes 0 Downloads 18 Views

2. Screening & Diagnosis

S9

30 12 Years of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Eastern Saxony − Correlation with an unscreened German population

32 Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (NBSCF) in region Moravia, Czech Republic

J. Hammermann1 , M. Stopsack2 , B. Wiedemann3 . 1 University Childrens Hospital, TU Dresden, CF-Center, Dresden, Germany; 2 TU Dresden, Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Dresden, Germany; 3 TU Dresden, Institute for Medical Infomatic and Biometrics, Dresden, Germany

I. Valaskova1,2 , R. Gaillyova1,2 , H. Vinohradska3 , A. Holcikova4 , L. Homola4 . 1 University Hospital Brno, Medical Genetics, Brno, Czech Republic; 2 Masaryk University, Medical Faculty, Brno, Czech Republic; 3 University Hospital Brno, Clinical Biochemistry, Brno, Czech Republic; 4 University Hospital Brno, Clinic of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Brno, Czech Republic

From June 1996 until December 2007 we performed a two-step IRT/DNA-screening for cystic fibrosis for the eastern Part of Saxony in Germany. We screened 160,674 neonates and detected 38 cases of cystic fibrosis. Of those 38 patients with cystic fibrosis 36 were followed up in our cystic fibrosis center until now. In comparison of those patients with age-correlated patients from the German register we could show, that the frequence of cftr-mutations in our population differes significant in comparison to Germany. The age at diagnosis was − as expected − with in the middle 97 days significant lower than in the rest of Germany with 3.6 years. Patients in eastern Saxony seemed two have a slightly better growth and weight gain and a better FEV1. The first detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by throat swab we found in mid range at the age of 23.9 month, the data from the German register showed a first detection in the middle at the age of 42 month, wich is significant later. But even so we found Pseudomonas aeruginosa earlier in life, when we looked at the microbiological findings over the years, we could show that in our screened population even so more microbiological diagnostic per patient, visit and year was done than in the German population, we had less Pseudomonas aeruginosa findings. In Conclusion because auf the small number of patients, we couldn’t show statistical significance of our findings, but we could show trends for a better weight gain, growth and lung function and less pseudomonas-acquisition in the screened population, wich should be a trend for implementation of a nationwide newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Germany.

In Octobre NBSCF was added to routine newborn screening in Czech Republic. The Brno CF centre being responsible for 40% of the Czech population (over 40,000 births a year). Each sample screening starts with quantification of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) as 1st tier in dry blood. The test was considered positive with concentration of IRT 65 ml/l. For 2nd tier samples with elevated IRT are analyzed for 36/32 CF mutations using INNO-LiPA CFTR19 + INNO-LiPA17+Tn INNOGENETICS or ELUCINOGENETM CF-EU1 kits. Tests are positive when 2 CF mutations are identified. If 1 mutation is detected, sweat testing and second IRT is performed to distinguish carriers from compound heterozygotes with second CF mutation not identified on mutation screening panel. CF infants and their families follow-up specialized medical care and genetic counseling. We have obtained first data of NBSCF. We have estimated provisionally frequency of CF in NBSCF and carrier frequency: 1% newborns with IRT level over cut-off, 0.028% newborns with confirmed CF, 0.085% newborns CF carriers, 0.23% newborns with polymorphisms with not conclusively clinical significance, 0.06% newborns with mild genotypes. We expect important information about the feasibility and reliability of biochemically based NBSCF in comparison to a DNA based screening. Newborn screening in our region is still in the early stages but has already presented many benefits: early diagnosis and prompt treatment, diagnosing CF among older siblings and determination of CF carrier status in newborns and extended family members, recognition of CF epidemiology and heterogeneity of CFTR mutations in Czech Republic. Supported by SOLVAY − INNOGENETICS

31 Analysis of CFTR mutations in hypertrypsinogenemic newborns in Russian population

˜ Spain: 10 years 33 Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis in Cataluna, of experience

N.V. Petrova1 , Z.A. Kusova2 , T.A. Vasilyeva1 , E.E. Timkovskaya1 , N.Y. Kashirskaya2 , N.I. Kapranov2 , R.A. Zinchenko1 . 1 Research Centre for Medical Genetics RAMS, Laboratory of Genetic Epidemiology, Moscow, Russian Federation; 2 Research Centre for Medical Genetics RAMS, Clinical Department of Cystic Fibrosis, Moscow, Russian Federation

S. Gartner1 , T. Casals2 , J.L. Marin3 , J.L. Seculi4 , O. Asensio5 , J.L. Hernandez3 , R. Prats6 , N. Cobos7 . 1 Unidat de Fibrosi Quistica. Hospital Vall d’Hebr´on, Barcelona, Spain; 2 Centre Diagnosi Gen`etic Molecula de Malalties Hereditaries. IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain; 3 Institut de Bioqu´ımica de Catalu˜na, Barcelona, Spain; 4 Unitat de Fibrosi Qu´ıstica. Hospital San Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain; 5 Unitat de Fibrosi Qu´ıstica, Hospital de Sabadell. Corporaci´o Parc Taul´ı, Barcelona, Spain; 6 Direcci´o General de Salut P´ublica, Barcelona, Spain; 7 Unitat de Fibrosi Qu´ıstica Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

The spectrum of presentation of cystic fibrosis (CF) is wide and significantly varied. Neonatal hypertrypsinogenemia is one of the clinical symptoms due to secretory abnormalities in pancreas. Neonatal screening for CF consists of the immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) test at least as the first step. The aim of the investigation was to reveal the risk group of CF among newborns with the first positive IRT test result. DNA samples extracted from dried blood spots of 810 newborns with the first positive IRT test result were analysed for 10 CFTR mutations (CFTRdele2,3(21kb), F508del, Idel507, 1677delTA, 2184insA, 2143delT, 2183AA>G, 394delTT, 3821delT, L138insA). All newborns were from Moscow and were born during 01.01.2008 to 31.12.2008 period. Screened mutations shared for 67.5% of mutant alleles of CF patients from Russia. MultiplexPCR and gel electrophoresis were carried out for mutation screening. 5 persons with two CFTR mutations (3 − F508del/F508del, 1 − CFTRdele2,3(21kb)/CFTRdele2,3(21kb), 1 − F508del/2184insA) and 33 persons with one mutant CFTR allele (26 heterozygous for F508del, 4 − CFTRdele2,3(21kb), 1 − 3821delT, 1 − L138ins) were revealed during the investigation. The total frequency of identified CF mutant alleles in newborns with the first positive IRT test result was 0.02654 (0.02031–0.03441) in Moscow population. This evaluation is significantly higher than the frequency of these mutations in the sample of healthy individuals from Russian population (0.00642 (0.0041–0.00951; p < 0.01).

We started a newborn screening (NS) for CF from September 1999 to 2008. 713422 newborns were screened. Our NS is based on determinations of IRT in the blood spot collected at 3−5 days. Infants with higher cut-off (120 ng/ml) were recalled for a second measurement (before 40 days of life). If the level remained high (cut-off 60 ng/ml) they were submitted to CFTR gene analysis (32 common mutations) and to sweat testing. Newborns presenting one CF mutation and positive sweat test were analysed for the complete CFTR gene (DGGE, SSCP and sequencing of abnormal patterns). Results: The IRT-1 was positive in 13.421 (1.8%) and the IRT-2 in 4.142 (0.5%). The total number of CF patients identified by NS was 98. 42 CF patients were identified by positive sweat test and two CF mutations in the first gene analysis. 50 CF patients were diagnosed by second mutations identified by the complete CFTR gene analysed. 6 patients were diagnosed by positive sweat test, and 2 mutations in the complete CFTR gene. There were 5 false-negative cases and 24 cases with inconclusive diagnosis. A total of 122 cases of CF (included 16 Meconium ileus and 2 cases diagnosis by positive familiar history) were detected with an incidence of 1/5.847 live births being much lower than the expected. F508del was found in 51% of alleles. Vit E levels were low in 47% of cases. No CF patients with chronic colonisation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were reported. Conclusions: The NS for CF allowed assessing the incidence of CF in our populations. The early diagnosis and treatment dramatically decrease the chronic colonisation of Pa. Also declining CF birth rates as genetic screening effect must be considered in future.