- Email: [email protected]
A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand
Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Materials Today: Proceedings journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/matpr
A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath ⇑, V. Vijayavignesh Department of Civil Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Tamil Nadu, India
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 25 July 2019 Received in revised form 26 November 2019 Accepted 30 November 2019 Available online xxxx Keywords: Self-compacting concrete Polypropylene fibers Manufactured sand Chemical admixtures (super plasticizer) Flexural properties
a b s t r a c t This review analyse the structural properties of the M-Sand addition with fiber reinforcerd Self Compacting concrete (SCC) is a high – execution solid that can traverse under its self-load to totally fill the structure work and self solidifies with no mechanical vibration. Comparison between the experimental results from the analysis exhibited that the proposed model provides satisfactorily predictions of ultimate compressive strength, failure strain, and stress-strain response. L-Box, U-Box, V-Funnel and J-Ring tests were performed to decide the properties of new concrete on both River sand and M sand. The properties of solidified cement on both R sand and M sand can likewise explored by leading the Flexural quality test. The test is directed after 28 days of restoring. The outcome of the review inferred that the Properties life time and workability of concrete. Ó 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Materials Engineering and Characterization 2019.
1. Introduction
2. Literature survey
Self compacting concrete (SCC) is generally called self setting concrete. The strong that can be compacted by its own one of a kind burden without any vibrators. It has the staggering passing capacity to stream the strong effectively to the sides of the zone without utilizing any compactors and vibrators. SCC is furthermore extensively less work genuine appeared differently in relation to standard concrete mixes. SCC is commonly similar to standard concrete with respect to its setting and diminishing time (grabbing quality), and quality. SCC gains its liquid properties by normally high level of fine aggregates, for example, sand and additionally added substance of explicit admixtures to settle the strong. In this undertaking, the assessments were done on the M30 grade SCC, composed utilizing four specific degrees (0.3, 0.6, 0.9 and 1.2%) of polypropylene fibre and a water bond degree of 0.45. The size of the Polypropylene fiber is 5 mm. L-Box, V-Funnel and J-Ring tests were performed to choose the properties of the new polypropylene fiber strengthened cement conveyed using R sand and M sand. This project is aimed to investigate the properties of set bond through the flexural quality test (See Tables 1 and 2).
2.1. Glass fiber
⇑ Corresponding author.
Shahana Sheril, et al. [1] deals with self compacting solid utilizing fly powder and glass fiber. In this work, an endeavour has been made to make a near report on the new and solidified state properties of M20 and M30 evaluations of cement blends of selfcompacting concrete (SCC) and glass fiber strengthened self compacting concrete (GFRSCC). The SCC and GFRSCC blends had a concrete substitution of 25% fly powder and expansion of glass fiber at 0%, 0.5%, 1.5% and 2% on all out volume blend. For testing its properties in the new state, slumflow test, Lbox and Vfunnel were utilized. Pressure (quality of 7 and 28 days), flexural and split elasticity tests were done. GFRSCC with 0.1% glass fiber indicated significant increment in the flexural quality than different examples the flexural quality of bars for 28 days are 8.30, 10.43, 13.17 and 14.08. K. Rubini et al. [2] Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) comprises of concrete, reinforced with Alkali Resistant glass Fibers which produce a slender, lightweight, yet solid material. High compressive and flexural Strength, capacity to replicate fine surface subtleties, low upkeep necessities, low coefficients of thermal development, high flame resistance, by watching the above test outcomes, it is presumed that the S2 Specimen (12% of Silica Fume
E-mail address: [email protected] (V. Gokulnath). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312 2214-7853/Ó 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Materials Engineering and Characterization 2019.
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312
2
B. Ramesh et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Table 1 Flexural Strength of Glass Fiber. S. No
Author
Material used
Grade of concrete
% of material
1
Shahana Sheril, et al., 2013
Glass fiber
M30
2
K. Rubini et al.
Glass fiber
M25
3
Manohar, et al.,
Glass Fiber
M40
4
R Bharathi Murugan, K. Haridhara et al.,
Glass Fiber
M30
5
Kasthuri M., Harini A. et al., 2017
Glass Fiber
M30
6
K. Rajeshkumar, N. Mahendran, et al., 2013
Glass Fiber
M35
0 0.5 1.5 1 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 0.3 0.9
Flexural Strength 7 Days
28 Days 8.3 10.43 13.17 14.08 3.82 4.23 4.27 4.32 9.1 11.8 12 12.7 12.9 5.33 5.51 5.69 5.87 2.2 2.6 3.1 3.7 5.12 6.31 7.97
2.85 3.5 3.55 3.59
1.6 2.1 2.4 3.2
Table 2 Flexural Strength of Other Various Reinforced Fibers. S.NO
1
Author
Material used
Grade of concrete
Portland Fly Ash
BA10
2
Norwati Jamaluddin, Ahmad Farhan Hamzah, Mohd Haziman Wan Ibrahim, Ramadhansyah Putra Jaya et al. Zeeshan Adib Ahmed, Dr. S.H. Mahure et al.,
Fly ash
M70
3
Adams Joe, Kanmalai Williams and Shrinath Rao K et al.,
Steel fibre
M30
4
D. Indu R. Elangovan et al.,
Fly Ash
M50
5
Ya Wou et al.
Fibrillated polypropylene fiber
M30
6
Matha Prasad Adari, Prof. E.V. Raghava Rao, D. Sateesh et al.,
Blast Furnace Slag
M40
and 0.5% of Glass Fiber) acquires Flexural quality contrasted with different mixes taken. Manohar et al. [3] deals on quality Characteristics of glass fiber reinforced self compacting concrete with fly ash remains and silica Fumes. The present work manages the workability and quality investigations on glass fiber strengthened self-compacting cement of evaluation M40 with fly ash remains and silica fumes. The mix proportion for self-compacting concrete were landed at by performing mix design and afterward adjusting utilizing EFNARC rules. The concrete was supplanted by 20% fly ash debris and 12% silica fumes by weight. The glass fiber rate was fluctuated from 0 to 0.8% by weight of cement. Development of glass fibers extended the 7 days flexural quality appeared differently in relation to the reference, anyway the addition was not basic. There was moderate (15% to 21%) development in 28 days flexural quality when fibres were added regarding the reference mix.
% of material
0.2 0.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.3
Flexural Strength 7 Days
28 Days
– – 3.27 3.56 3.66 3.12 – – – – 1.23 1.71 1.91 2.07 2.67 – – – – 4.9
6.44 4.41 4 4.15 4.36 4.1 19.47 21.12 21.89 26.4 3.11 3.78 4.41 6.02 6.2 16.21 19.45 24.54 27.16 7.5
R. Bharathi Murugan, et al. [4] deals with impact of glass fiber on new and solidified properties of self compacting concrete. Glass filaments were added for 5 diverse of volume parts (0%, 0.1%, 0.3%, 0.5% and 0.6%) to SCC concrete. The new condition of concrete is described by slump flow, T-50 cm Slump flow, and V-Funnel and L-box tests. The solidified properties of SCC glass fiber Reinforced concrete were upgraded, due to spanning the previous miniaturized scale splits in concrete by glass fiber expansion. The rate increment in Strength was 0.80%, 3.82%, 5.41% and 6.53% for SCC-01, SCC-03, SCC-05 and SCC-06 respectively. Kasthuri M et al. [5]: deals on examination among strength and Durability of glass fiber reinforced self compacting concrete with typical Concrete. In this investigation, addition of four diverse volume divisions of glass filaments viz. 0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15% and 0.20% on a M30 grade SCC was examined. For testing the properties of SCC and Glass Fiber Reinforced SCC (GFRSCC) in new state, slump
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312
B. Ramesh et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
flow, L-box and V-funnel tests were led. In this paper, the outcomes got on the new and solidified properties of SCC with and without glass fibres are introduced. The normal 7 days compressive, split tensile and flexural strength of SCC are 2.2 N/mm2, 2.6 N/mm2 and 3.1 N/mm2. K. Rajeshkumar, et al., [6] deals with exploratory investigations on strength, Durability and conduct of pillar utilizing SCC with GLASS fiber strands. It is included to the mixtures in different level of 0, 0.03 and 0.06. For testing the properties of SCC and Glass Fiber Reinforced SCC (GFRSCC) in new state, slump stream, L-box and V-funnel tests were coordinated. In this paper, the results on the new and hardened properties of SCC with and without glass fibres are presented. For 28 days the flexural quality test is 5.12, 6.31, and 7.97 individually. 2.2. Various fibre reinforced concrete Norwati Jamaludin et al. [7] This paper exhibits the impact of utilizing coal base cinder as a fractional substitution of fine totals in self-compacting concrete (SCC) on its new properties and flexural quality. An examination between SCC with different supplanting’s of fine totals with coal base slag demonstrated that SCC got flexural quality reduction on increment of water concrete proportion from 0.35 to 0.45. The normal sand was supplanted with coal base fiery debris up to 30% volumetrically. The new properties were researched by droop stream, T500 spread time, L-box test and sifter isolation obstruction so as to assess its self-similarity by contrasted with control tests implant with characteristic sand. The outcomes uncovered that the flow properties and passing capacity of SCC blends are diminished with higher substance of coal base cinder substitution. The outcomes additionally demonstrated that the flexural quality is influenced by the nearness of coal base cinder in the solid. Furthermore, the water bond proportions are impact fundamentally with higher cover content in cement. Ash Zeeshan Adib Ahmed et al. [8] This paper explores the fresh and solidified properties of HSSCC containing fly ash remains. The SCC preliminaries were made according to EFNARC particulars at different substitution levels (0, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5%) of fly ash for M70 grade of concrete. The Hardened properties are tested under 7 days and 28 days flexural strength, the 20% substitution of fly ash remains gives ideal quality yet 30% swap gives ideal quality for M70 grade of concrete. Adams Joe et al. [9] In this investigation 12 beams for conventional and self-compacting concrete will be casted and their flexural quality outcomes will be examined for 28 days and contrasted and normal and self-compacting concrete. Test results demonstrate that there is an expansion in the compressive quality and flexural quality of self-compacting concrete with steel fiber when contrasted with common concrete with steel fiber. D. Indu R. Elangovan et al., [10] The point of this study is to discover an ideal mix proportioning of HSSCC for various grades ((30 – 80) Mpa). Various preliminary mixes must be embraced like Fly Ash. The strength can be expanded by decreasing the waterCement proportion and including adequate amount of mineral admixture. Likewise substance admixtures are utilized to improve the usefulness and to limit isolation. Tests, will be led in fresh state to assess the nature of mix. In the wake of throwing, the specimens are tested for three fundamental qualities, for example, Compressive quality, Split tensile and Flexural quality at 7 days and 28th days separately. Yao Wu et al. [11] this paper deals with the quality and disfigurement attributes of PFRC pillars were examined by four-point twisting test. The impact of two sorts of polypropylene fibers in little portions (0.2 vol% 1.5 vol%) on the flexural quality and conduct of solid shafts were examined. Besides, the composite instrument between the polypropylene fiber and cement was
3
broke down and discussed. The mixes were bunched in a 30 L vertical pivot solid blender. Totals and bond were first mixed, and the water (containing the super plasticizer) was logically included until a homogeneous cement was gotten. At that point, the filaments were included, and the solid was mixed for somewhere around 3 min. Mattha Prasadh Adari et al. [12] this examination is for trial and numerical investigation on mechanical properties, for example, flexural quality and split tensile of self-compacting concrete (SCC) and the relating properties of convectional concrete (CC) were contemplated. The age at stacking of the concrete for 7 and 28 days curing. Blast furnace of 0.3% is included while planning M40 grade concrete. Water bond proportion of 0.4. James Ovrii et al. [13] the compressive and flexural qualities of solid utilizing rice husk ash debris (RHA) as halfway substitution for cement is explored. The Rice Husk Ash (RHA) substituted instead of cement were 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 and 1.2 RHA. The specimens were relieved for a time of 7, 14, 21, 28 and multi day separately and it was seen that the control specimen(0% RHA) experienced deformities, for example, blossoming yet the RHA-Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) specimens did not. T. Sravana Sandhya et al. [14] This project manages the flexural quality of self-compacting concrete where the cement is in part supplanted with fly ash-powder as10%, 20%, and 40% by weight of cement. The improved dose of super plasticizer of 0.5% of powder content is utilized in each mix. The flexural quality characteristics are examined. The significant strides in the production of Self Compacting Concrete are appropriate plan of mixes, the choice of admixtures that can keep up ease of mix and assessing the properties of the concrete acquired. R. Vasusmitha et al. [15] An endeavour is made to report study about Mechanical properties of High Strength Self Compacting concrete with various materials other than those utilized generally like Crushed basalt, Quartz sand, Quartz powder and so forth., Investigation is likewise carried on Permeability and Durability qualities of Concrete. It is outstanding that the properties of concrete are influenced by cementations’ lattice, total, and the change zone between these two stages. Decreasing the water-cement proportion and the expansion of pozzolanic admixtures like silica fumes are regularly used to change the microstructure of the framework and to upgrade the progress zone. The Reduction of the water-cement proportion results in a diminishing in porosity and refinement of narrow pores in network. One approach to build solid streaming capacity is limiting the voids among particles of the powder mix formed with cement, silica fumes and other fine segments. Mithra, P. Ramanathan et al. [16] The primary goal of this examination was to research the flexural conduct of self compacting Concrete (SCC) beams utilizing GGBFS as mineral admixtures alongside the expansion Super plasticizer. Trial based investigation has been broadly utilized as a way to discover the reaction of individual components of structure. In the present examination, destructive test on simply supported beam estimating 100 X 100 X 2000 mm and strengthened with HYSD bars was performed in the lab and load deflection information of that SCC reinforced solid beams was recorded. Primer trial examination was done to ponder the impact of GGBFS on crisp and solidified properties of SCC. A diagnostic and trial examination was completed for a beams with various mixes consolidated different portions of GGBFS (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2) as fractional supplanting of cement with a water-cement proportion of 0.35 and 0.40 is embraced. To improve the workability of solid, super plasticizer of 2.2% by weight of cement is included. Jagadeesh K. et al. [17] In this undertaking an investigation has been done on the impact of Polypropylene Fibers on both the new and solidified properties of SCC like compressive and flexural
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312
4
B. Ramesh et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Flexural strength (7days) 20
Shahana Sheril,
15
K. Rubini
10
Manohar, Kasthuri.M , Harini.A K. Rajeshkumar, N. Mahendran 0
0.5
1
2.5
1.5 % of materials
Fig. 1. Flexural Strength of 7 days for the Glass Fiber Reinforced Self- Compacting Concrete.
FLEXURAL STRENGTH (28 DAYS) 20 Shahana Sheril,
N /mm2
15 K. Rubini 10
Manohar, Kasthuri.M , Harini.A
5 0 0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
R Bharathi Murugan , K Haridhara,,
% of materials Fig. 2. Flexural Strength of 28 days for the Glass Fiber Reinforced Self- Compacting Concrete.
quality. The SCC is made with 20% supplanting of cement with silica fumes and changing rate Polypropylene fibres from 0% to 2% i.e., 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2% to the all-out volume of cement alongside addition of super plasticizer 0.6% to the volume of concrete substance for M35 mix assignments. The primary focal point of this examination will be on researching greatest level of substitution Polypropylene Fibers that can be made added to add up to volume of cement to accomplish most extreme estimation of both compressive and flexural quality and to contemplate the flexural conduct of beams with and without reinforcement. Beaudoin J.J, et al. [18] The state of the art of fiber-reinforced concrete systems is covered in this book. This book constitutes a contribution to the concrete literature during a period of dynamic growth of cement composite technology in the construction materials industry. The principles and modern theories predicting the role of fiber reinforcement in cement systems are introduced in a concise and logical manner. The latest developments and research on glass fiber-reinforced cement are presented in the context of behavioural mechanisms, matrix microstructure and fiber–matrix interface physics and chemistry. This methodology was also applied to
cement composites containing polypropylene, polyethylene, polyamide, carbon, polyvinyl alcohol and numerous other fiber types. Joseph Robert Yost, et al. [19] Deflection behaviour of concrete flexural members reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcing bars is investigated. It is recognized that serviceability plays a significant role in the design of GFRPreinforced concrete beams. Therefore, accurate modelling of flexural stiffness is critical and the effect of influencing parameters must be considered. This study accounts for variations in concrete strength fc¢, reinforcement density r, and shear span-depth ratio (av / d). Experimental results from 48 simply supported concrete beams reinforced with GFRP are compared with ACI Committee 4400 s published deflection model. The ACI 440.1R model is found to overestimate the effective moment of inertia, and an appropriate modification is presented. Brahim Benmokrane et al. [20] Accelerated aging tests are being conducted on more than 20 types of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcing bars, which are produced from different combinations of constituent materials, manufacturing parameters, sizes and shapes, and surface coatings. The specimens are being sub-
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312
5
B. Ramesh et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Flexural strength (7days) 30 Norwati Jamaluddin Zeeshan Adib Ahmed N/mm2
25
Adams Joe D. Indu
20
YAO Wu Matha Prasad Adari
15
James E. O. Ovri 0 0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
R.Vasumathi M.Mithra
% of materials
Fig. 3. Flexural Strength of 7 days for the all Fiber Reinforced Self- Compacting Concrete.
Flexural strength (28days) 30 Norwati Jamaluddin Zeeshan Adib Ahmed
25
Adams Joe D. Indu
N/mm2
20
YAO Wu Matha Prasad Adari
15
James E. O. Ovri T.Sravana Sandhya R.Vasumathi
10
M.Mithra 0 0
0.5
1
1.5
% of materials
2
2.5
Shahana Sheril . Rubini
Fig. 4. Flexural strength of 28 days for the all fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete.
jected to various sustained tensile loading (22 to 68% of ultimate strength) in three types of alkaline environments: NaOH, simulated pore-water solution, and embedded in concrete. Time to rupture or residual strength, as applicable, have been determined. Additionally, stress corrosion mechanisms were evaluated by various microstructural analyses. The results showed clearly that alkaline ions and moisture could penetrate or diffuse through the resin (or through cracks and voids) to the interphases and the fibers. For GFRP bars embedded in moist concrete under various sustained stress levels, three types of stress corrosion mechanisms have been identified: stress dominated, crack propagation dominated, and diffusion dominate. Mohamed Safi, et al. [21] A new type of structural columns is being developed for new construction. They are made of
concrete-encased fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) tubes. The concrete-filled FRP tubes are cast in place. The tube acts as a formwork, protective jacket, confinement, and shear and flexural reinforcement. It can also be used to complement or replace conventional steel reinforcement of the column. This paper presents the results of experimental and analytical studies of the performance of concrete columns confined with carbon and glass FRP composite tubes. Concrete-filled FRP tubes are instrumented and tested under uniaxial compressive load. Test variables include type of fiber, thickness of tube, and concrete compressive strength. Results show that external confinement of concrete by FRP tubes can significantly enhance the strength, ductility, and energy absorption capacity of concrete. Equations to predict the compressive strength and failure strain, as well as the entire stress–strain
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312
6
B. Ramesh et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
curve of concrete-filled FRP tubes, were developed. Comparison between the experimental results and those of analytical indicates that the proposed model provides satisfactorily predictions of ultimate compressive strength, failure strain, and stress–strain response. The study shows that the available models generally overestimate the strength of concrete confined by FRP tubes, resulting in unsafe design. P.V. Vijay, et al. [22] This paper presents bending behaviour of rectangular concrete beams reinforced with sand-coated and ribbed glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars including failure mode delineation and deformability response. Discussion on the bending behaviour of the GFRP reinforced concrete members includes the influence of strength, stiffness, and geometric properties of concrete and GFRP bars. In addition, the limit state of energy absorption is established, which is a ratio of energy absorption at ultimate failure of GFRP reinforced concrete beams under bending to that at a limiting serviceability curvature. The energy absorption concept including the limit state has been introduced herein; this satisfies the curvature limit state so that the deflection and crack-width limit states can be unified and deformability factors established to avoid catastrophic failures. Antonio De Luca, et al. [23] Glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars are emerging as a valuable option as internal reinforcement for concrete structures, particularly when corrosion resistance or electromagnetic transparency is sought. GFRP bars, however, are typically not allowed as compression reinforcement in current design guidelines. An experimental campaign on fullscale GFRP reinforced concrete (RC) columns under pure axial load was undertaken using specimens with a 24 24 in. (0.61 0.61 m) square cross section. The study was conducted to investigate whether the compressive behavior of longitudinal GFRP bars impacts the column performance, and to understand the contribution of GFRP ties to the confinement of the concrete core, and to prevent instability of the longitudinal reinforcement. The results showed that the GFRP RC specimens behaved similarly to the steel RC counterpart, while the spacing of the ties strongly influenced the failure mode. The table discussed about the relation between flexural strength for 7 days and 28 days from the various articles. The relation between Flexural strength and material adding percentage shown in Fig. 1 from various articles. From that maximum flexural strength obtained at 1.5% by K. Rubini et al. Flexural strength increases with weight percentage. Flexural strength is maximum at 28 days compare to the 7 days. That was observed by the Manohar et al., (See Figs. 2, 3 and 4). 3. Conclusion The analysis from the literature on the comparison of river sand and M Sand for 7 days and 28 days. The outcomes from the literature shows the compressive strength is gradually increasing by adding the percentage of fiber. But when compared with R sand, the difference in the strength in M sand is comparatively low. The results concluded that like R sand, M- sand shows good strength and recommended for low cost of construction, with manufacture sand of SCC. CRediT authorship contribution statement B. Ramesh: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration. V. Gokulnath: Resources, Data curation, Validation, Investigation. V. Vijayavignesh: Methodology.
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. References [1] Shahana Sheril P.T. Ghousia College of Engineering, Ramnagaram, Karnataka, 2013, self-compacting concrete using fly ash and glass fibre, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT) 2(9) (2013) IJERT IJERT ISSN: 2278-0181. [2] K. Rubini, An Experimental Study on Self-Consolidating Concrete with Silica Fume and Glass Fibre, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT) 5 (12) (2016), http:// www.ijert.org ISSN: 2278-0181 IJERTV5IS120296. [3] Manohar, Strength characteristics of glass fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete with fly ash and silica fume, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT) 4 (08) (2015) 2015, ISSN: 2278- 0181. [4] M.K. Haridhara et al., Influence of Glass Fiber on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Self Compacting Concrete, IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci. 80 (2017) (2004) 012004. [5] M. Kasthuri, A. Harini, et al., Comparison between Strength and Durability of Glass Fibre Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete with Normal Concrete, 6(2) (2017) ISSN(Online) : 2319-875. [6] K. Rajeshkumar, N. Mahendran, Experimental Studies On Strength, Durability And Behaviour of Beam Using SCC With E.GLASS Fibre Strands. ISSN:22780181 2(4) (2013) [7] Norwati Jamaluddin, Ahmad Farhan Hamzah, Mohd Haziman Wan Ibrahim, Ramadhansyah Putra Jaya, Fresh Properties and Flexural Strength of SelfCompacting Concrete Integrating Coal Bottom Ash, doi:10.1051/C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 201/0 0 (201)conf 201 MATEC Web Conferences, 2016. [8] Zeeshan Adib Ahmed, Dr. S.H. Mahure, High Strength Self-Compacting Concrete using Fly Ash, 4(VIII), August 2016 IC Value: 13.98 ISSN: 2321-9653 [9] Adams Joe, Kanmalai Williams, Rao K. Shrinath, Experimental Study on Flexural Behaviour of Self Compacting Steel Fibre Concrete, The 2013 world congress on advances in structural and mechanics(ASEM13), jeju, Korea, September 8-12-2013 [10] R. Elangovan Indu, Optimum Mix Proportioning of High Strength SelfCompacting Concrete, Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. (IJETT) 37 (6) (2016). [11] Wu Yao, Flexural Strength and Behavior of Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams, J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 17 (2) (2002). [12] Matha Prasad Adari, Prof. E.V.Raghava Rao, D.Sateesh, An experimental development of m40 grade self-compacted concrete & comparison in behaviour with m40 conventional concrete [Adari*, 4.(9): September, 2015] ISSN: 2277-9655 (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785. [13] James E. Ash, O. Ovri, Ovie P. Umukoro, The Compressive and Flexural Strengths of Self Compacting Concrete Using Rice Husk, Int. J. Adv. Mater. Res. 1 (3) (2015) 80–85, http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ijamr. [14] T. Sravana Sandhya, Venkata Narsireddy Sagili, Mohammed Hussain, Flexural strength of self-compacting concrete, Int. J. Eng. Techniques – 4(2), Mar – Apr 2018 ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 217 [15] R. Vasusmitha, P. Dr, Srinivasa Rao, Strength And Durability Study Of High Strength Self Compacting Concrete, Int. J. Mining, Metallurgy Mech. Eng. (IJMMME) 1 (1) (2013), ISSN 2320–4060 (Online). [16] M. Mithra, P. Ramanathan, P. Muthupriya, R. Venkatasubramani, Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Self Compacting Concrete Containing GGBFS, Int. J. Eng. Innovative Technol. (IJEIT) 1 (4) (April 2012), ISSN: 2277-3754. [17] K.A. Jagadeesh, E. Ramesh Babu, Flexural strength of self compactimng concrete with silica fume and polypropylene fibres with and without reinforcement, Int. J. Adv. Technol. Eng. Sci. www.ijates.com 02(07), July 2014 ISSN (online): 2348–7550 [18] J.J. Beaudoin, Handbook Of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete, Principles, Properties, Developments And Applications, Accession Number: 00642758, ISBN: 0815512368, February 1994. [19] Joseph Robert Yost, Shawn P. Gross, David W. Dinehart, Effective Moment of Inertia for Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Concrete Beams, 100(6), January 2003 [20] Brahim Benmokrane, Peng Wang, Habib Rahman, Durability of Glass FiberReinforced Polymer Reinforcing Bars in Concrete Environment, 6(3), August 2002 [21] Mohamed Saafi, Houssam Toutanji, Zongjin Li, Behavior of Concrete Columns Confined with Fiber Reinforced Polymer Tubes, 96(4), January 1999. [22] P.V. Vijay, Hota V.S. GangaRao, Bending Behavior and Deformability of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Members, 98(6) (2001). MS No. S-2009-092.R2 received and reviewed under Institute publication policies, American Concrete Institute. August 2009. [23] Antonio De Luca, Fabio Matta, Antonio Nanni, Behaviour of Full-Scale Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Columns under Axial Load, ACI Struct. J. 107 (5) (2010), MS No. S-2009-092.R2 received and reviewed under Institute publication policies, American Concrete Institute. August 2009.
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Materials Today: Proceedings journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/matpr
A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath ⇑, V. Vijayavignesh Department of Civil Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Tamil Nadu, India
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 25 July 2019 Received in revised form 26 November 2019 Accepted 30 November 2019 Available online xxxx Keywords: Self-compacting concrete Polypropylene fibers Manufactured sand Chemical admixtures (super plasticizer) Flexural properties
a b s t r a c t This review analyse the structural properties of the M-Sand addition with fiber reinforcerd Self Compacting concrete (SCC) is a high – execution solid that can traverse under its self-load to totally fill the structure work and self solidifies with no mechanical vibration. Comparison between the experimental results from the analysis exhibited that the proposed model provides satisfactorily predictions of ultimate compressive strength, failure strain, and stress-strain response. L-Box, U-Box, V-Funnel and J-Ring tests were performed to decide the properties of new concrete on both River sand and M sand. The properties of solidified cement on both R sand and M sand can likewise explored by leading the Flexural quality test. The test is directed after 28 days of restoring. The outcome of the review inferred that the Properties life time and workability of concrete. Ó 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Materials Engineering and Characterization 2019.
1. Introduction
2. Literature survey
Self compacting concrete (SCC) is generally called self setting concrete. The strong that can be compacted by its own one of a kind burden without any vibrators. It has the staggering passing capacity to stream the strong effectively to the sides of the zone without utilizing any compactors and vibrators. SCC is furthermore extensively less work genuine appeared differently in relation to standard concrete mixes. SCC is commonly similar to standard concrete with respect to its setting and diminishing time (grabbing quality), and quality. SCC gains its liquid properties by normally high level of fine aggregates, for example, sand and additionally added substance of explicit admixtures to settle the strong. In this undertaking, the assessments were done on the M30 grade SCC, composed utilizing four specific degrees (0.3, 0.6, 0.9 and 1.2%) of polypropylene fibre and a water bond degree of 0.45. The size of the Polypropylene fiber is 5 mm. L-Box, V-Funnel and J-Ring tests were performed to choose the properties of the new polypropylene fiber strengthened cement conveyed using R sand and M sand. This project is aimed to investigate the properties of set bond through the flexural quality test (See Tables 1 and 2).
2.1. Glass fiber
⇑ Corresponding author.
Shahana Sheril, et al. [1] deals with self compacting solid utilizing fly powder and glass fiber. In this work, an endeavour has been made to make a near report on the new and solidified state properties of M20 and M30 evaluations of cement blends of selfcompacting concrete (SCC) and glass fiber strengthened self compacting concrete (GFRSCC). The SCC and GFRSCC blends had a concrete substitution of 25% fly powder and expansion of glass fiber at 0%, 0.5%, 1.5% and 2% on all out volume blend. For testing its properties in the new state, slumflow test, Lbox and Vfunnel were utilized. Pressure (quality of 7 and 28 days), flexural and split elasticity tests were done. GFRSCC with 0.1% glass fiber indicated significant increment in the flexural quality than different examples the flexural quality of bars for 28 days are 8.30, 10.43, 13.17 and 14.08. K. Rubini et al. [2] Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) comprises of concrete, reinforced with Alkali Resistant glass Fibers which produce a slender, lightweight, yet solid material. High compressive and flexural Strength, capacity to replicate fine surface subtleties, low upkeep necessities, low coefficients of thermal development, high flame resistance, by watching the above test outcomes, it is presumed that the S2 Specimen (12% of Silica Fume
E-mail address: [email protected] (V. Gokulnath). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312 2214-7853/Ó 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Materials Engineering and Characterization 2019.
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312
2
B. Ramesh et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Table 1 Flexural Strength of Glass Fiber. S. No
Author
Material used
Grade of concrete
% of material
1
Shahana Sheril, et al., 2013
Glass fiber
M30
2
K. Rubini et al.
Glass fiber
M25
3
Manohar, et al.,
Glass Fiber
M40
4
R Bharathi Murugan, K. Haridhara et al.,
Glass Fiber
M30
5
Kasthuri M., Harini A. et al., 2017
Glass Fiber
M30
6
K. Rajeshkumar, N. Mahendran, et al., 2013
Glass Fiber
M35
0 0.5 1.5 1 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 1 0.5 1 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 0.3 0.9
Flexural Strength 7 Days
28 Days 8.3 10.43 13.17 14.08 3.82 4.23 4.27 4.32 9.1 11.8 12 12.7 12.9 5.33 5.51 5.69 5.87 2.2 2.6 3.1 3.7 5.12 6.31 7.97
2.85 3.5 3.55 3.59
1.6 2.1 2.4 3.2
Table 2 Flexural Strength of Other Various Reinforced Fibers. S.NO
1
Author
Material used
Grade of concrete
Portland Fly Ash
BA10
2
Norwati Jamaluddin, Ahmad Farhan Hamzah, Mohd Haziman Wan Ibrahim, Ramadhansyah Putra Jaya et al. Zeeshan Adib Ahmed, Dr. S.H. Mahure et al.,
Fly ash
M70
3
Adams Joe, Kanmalai Williams and Shrinath Rao K et al.,
Steel fibre
M30
4
D. Indu R. Elangovan et al.,
Fly Ash
M50
5
Ya Wou et al.
Fibrillated polypropylene fiber
M30
6
Matha Prasad Adari, Prof. E.V. Raghava Rao, D. Sateesh et al.,
Blast Furnace Slag
M40
and 0.5% of Glass Fiber) acquires Flexural quality contrasted with different mixes taken. Manohar et al. [3] deals on quality Characteristics of glass fiber reinforced self compacting concrete with fly ash remains and silica Fumes. The present work manages the workability and quality investigations on glass fiber strengthened self-compacting cement of evaluation M40 with fly ash remains and silica fumes. The mix proportion for self-compacting concrete were landed at by performing mix design and afterward adjusting utilizing EFNARC rules. The concrete was supplanted by 20% fly ash debris and 12% silica fumes by weight. The glass fiber rate was fluctuated from 0 to 0.8% by weight of cement. Development of glass fibers extended the 7 days flexural quality appeared differently in relation to the reference, anyway the addition was not basic. There was moderate (15% to 21%) development in 28 days flexural quality when fibres were added regarding the reference mix.
% of material
0.2 0.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 1.5 2 0.3
Flexural Strength 7 Days
28 Days
– – 3.27 3.56 3.66 3.12 – – – – 1.23 1.71 1.91 2.07 2.67 – – – – 4.9
6.44 4.41 4 4.15 4.36 4.1 19.47 21.12 21.89 26.4 3.11 3.78 4.41 6.02 6.2 16.21 19.45 24.54 27.16 7.5
R. Bharathi Murugan, et al. [4] deals with impact of glass fiber on new and solidified properties of self compacting concrete. Glass filaments were added for 5 diverse of volume parts (0%, 0.1%, 0.3%, 0.5% and 0.6%) to SCC concrete. The new condition of concrete is described by slump flow, T-50 cm Slump flow, and V-Funnel and L-box tests. The solidified properties of SCC glass fiber Reinforced concrete were upgraded, due to spanning the previous miniaturized scale splits in concrete by glass fiber expansion. The rate increment in Strength was 0.80%, 3.82%, 5.41% and 6.53% for SCC-01, SCC-03, SCC-05 and SCC-06 respectively. Kasthuri M et al. [5]: deals on examination among strength and Durability of glass fiber reinforced self compacting concrete with typical Concrete. In this investigation, addition of four diverse volume divisions of glass filaments viz. 0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15% and 0.20% on a M30 grade SCC was examined. For testing the properties of SCC and Glass Fiber Reinforced SCC (GFRSCC) in new state, slump
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312
B. Ramesh et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
flow, L-box and V-funnel tests were led. In this paper, the outcomes got on the new and solidified properties of SCC with and without glass fibres are introduced. The normal 7 days compressive, split tensile and flexural strength of SCC are 2.2 N/mm2, 2.6 N/mm2 and 3.1 N/mm2. K. Rajeshkumar, et al., [6] deals with exploratory investigations on strength, Durability and conduct of pillar utilizing SCC with GLASS fiber strands. It is included to the mixtures in different level of 0, 0.03 and 0.06. For testing the properties of SCC and Glass Fiber Reinforced SCC (GFRSCC) in new state, slump stream, L-box and V-funnel tests were coordinated. In this paper, the results on the new and hardened properties of SCC with and without glass fibres are presented. For 28 days the flexural quality test is 5.12, 6.31, and 7.97 individually. 2.2. Various fibre reinforced concrete Norwati Jamaludin et al. [7] This paper exhibits the impact of utilizing coal base cinder as a fractional substitution of fine totals in self-compacting concrete (SCC) on its new properties and flexural quality. An examination between SCC with different supplanting’s of fine totals with coal base slag demonstrated that SCC got flexural quality reduction on increment of water concrete proportion from 0.35 to 0.45. The normal sand was supplanted with coal base fiery debris up to 30% volumetrically. The new properties were researched by droop stream, T500 spread time, L-box test and sifter isolation obstruction so as to assess its self-similarity by contrasted with control tests implant with characteristic sand. The outcomes uncovered that the flow properties and passing capacity of SCC blends are diminished with higher substance of coal base cinder substitution. The outcomes additionally demonstrated that the flexural quality is influenced by the nearness of coal base cinder in the solid. Furthermore, the water bond proportions are impact fundamentally with higher cover content in cement. Ash Zeeshan Adib Ahmed et al. [8] This paper explores the fresh and solidified properties of HSSCC containing fly ash remains. The SCC preliminaries were made according to EFNARC particulars at different substitution levels (0, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5%) of fly ash for M70 grade of concrete. The Hardened properties are tested under 7 days and 28 days flexural strength, the 20% substitution of fly ash remains gives ideal quality yet 30% swap gives ideal quality for M70 grade of concrete. Adams Joe et al. [9] In this investigation 12 beams for conventional and self-compacting concrete will be casted and their flexural quality outcomes will be examined for 28 days and contrasted and normal and self-compacting concrete. Test results demonstrate that there is an expansion in the compressive quality and flexural quality of self-compacting concrete with steel fiber when contrasted with common concrete with steel fiber. D. Indu R. Elangovan et al., [10] The point of this study is to discover an ideal mix proportioning of HSSCC for various grades ((30 – 80) Mpa). Various preliminary mixes must be embraced like Fly Ash. The strength can be expanded by decreasing the waterCement proportion and including adequate amount of mineral admixture. Likewise substance admixtures are utilized to improve the usefulness and to limit isolation. Tests, will be led in fresh state to assess the nature of mix. In the wake of throwing, the specimens are tested for three fundamental qualities, for example, Compressive quality, Split tensile and Flexural quality at 7 days and 28th days separately. Yao Wu et al. [11] this paper deals with the quality and disfigurement attributes of PFRC pillars were examined by four-point twisting test. The impact of two sorts of polypropylene fibers in little portions (0.2 vol% 1.5 vol%) on the flexural quality and conduct of solid shafts were examined. Besides, the composite instrument between the polypropylene fiber and cement was
3
broke down and discussed. The mixes were bunched in a 30 L vertical pivot solid blender. Totals and bond were first mixed, and the water (containing the super plasticizer) was logically included until a homogeneous cement was gotten. At that point, the filaments were included, and the solid was mixed for somewhere around 3 min. Mattha Prasadh Adari et al. [12] this examination is for trial and numerical investigation on mechanical properties, for example, flexural quality and split tensile of self-compacting concrete (SCC) and the relating properties of convectional concrete (CC) were contemplated. The age at stacking of the concrete for 7 and 28 days curing. Blast furnace of 0.3% is included while planning M40 grade concrete. Water bond proportion of 0.4. James Ovrii et al. [13] the compressive and flexural qualities of solid utilizing rice husk ash debris (RHA) as halfway substitution for cement is explored. The Rice Husk Ash (RHA) substituted instead of cement were 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 and 1.2 RHA. The specimens were relieved for a time of 7, 14, 21, 28 and multi day separately and it was seen that the control specimen(0% RHA) experienced deformities, for example, blossoming yet the RHA-Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) specimens did not. T. Sravana Sandhya et al. [14] This project manages the flexural quality of self-compacting concrete where the cement is in part supplanted with fly ash-powder as10%, 20%, and 40% by weight of cement. The improved dose of super plasticizer of 0.5% of powder content is utilized in each mix. The flexural quality characteristics are examined. The significant strides in the production of Self Compacting Concrete are appropriate plan of mixes, the choice of admixtures that can keep up ease of mix and assessing the properties of the concrete acquired. R. Vasusmitha et al. [15] An endeavour is made to report study about Mechanical properties of High Strength Self Compacting concrete with various materials other than those utilized generally like Crushed basalt, Quartz sand, Quartz powder and so forth., Investigation is likewise carried on Permeability and Durability qualities of Concrete. It is outstanding that the properties of concrete are influenced by cementations’ lattice, total, and the change zone between these two stages. Decreasing the water-cement proportion and the expansion of pozzolanic admixtures like silica fumes are regularly used to change the microstructure of the framework and to upgrade the progress zone. The Reduction of the water-cement proportion results in a diminishing in porosity and refinement of narrow pores in network. One approach to build solid streaming capacity is limiting the voids among particles of the powder mix formed with cement, silica fumes and other fine segments. Mithra, P. Ramanathan et al. [16] The primary goal of this examination was to research the flexural conduct of self compacting Concrete (SCC) beams utilizing GGBFS as mineral admixtures alongside the expansion Super plasticizer. Trial based investigation has been broadly utilized as a way to discover the reaction of individual components of structure. In the present examination, destructive test on simply supported beam estimating 100 X 100 X 2000 mm and strengthened with HYSD bars was performed in the lab and load deflection information of that SCC reinforced solid beams was recorded. Primer trial examination was done to ponder the impact of GGBFS on crisp and solidified properties of SCC. A diagnostic and trial examination was completed for a beams with various mixes consolidated different portions of GGBFS (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2) as fractional supplanting of cement with a water-cement proportion of 0.35 and 0.40 is embraced. To improve the workability of solid, super plasticizer of 2.2% by weight of cement is included. Jagadeesh K. et al. [17] In this undertaking an investigation has been done on the impact of Polypropylene Fibers on both the new and solidified properties of SCC like compressive and flexural
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312
4
B. Ramesh et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Flexural strength (7days) 20
Shahana Sheril,
15
K. Rubini
10
Manohar, Kasthuri.M , Harini.A K. Rajeshkumar, N. Mahendran 0
0.5
1
2.5
1.5 % of materials
Fig. 1. Flexural Strength of 7 days for the Glass Fiber Reinforced Self- Compacting Concrete.
FLEXURAL STRENGTH (28 DAYS) 20 Shahana Sheril,
N /mm2
15 K. Rubini 10
Manohar, Kasthuri.M , Harini.A
5 0 0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
R Bharathi Murugan , K Haridhara,,
% of materials Fig. 2. Flexural Strength of 28 days for the Glass Fiber Reinforced Self- Compacting Concrete.
quality. The SCC is made with 20% supplanting of cement with silica fumes and changing rate Polypropylene fibres from 0% to 2% i.e., 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2% to the all-out volume of cement alongside addition of super plasticizer 0.6% to the volume of concrete substance for M35 mix assignments. The primary focal point of this examination will be on researching greatest level of substitution Polypropylene Fibers that can be made added to add up to volume of cement to accomplish most extreme estimation of both compressive and flexural quality and to contemplate the flexural conduct of beams with and without reinforcement. Beaudoin J.J, et al. [18] The state of the art of fiber-reinforced concrete systems is covered in this book. This book constitutes a contribution to the concrete literature during a period of dynamic growth of cement composite technology in the construction materials industry. The principles and modern theories predicting the role of fiber reinforcement in cement systems are introduced in a concise and logical manner. The latest developments and research on glass fiber-reinforced cement are presented in the context of behavioural mechanisms, matrix microstructure and fiber–matrix interface physics and chemistry. This methodology was also applied to
cement composites containing polypropylene, polyethylene, polyamide, carbon, polyvinyl alcohol and numerous other fiber types. Joseph Robert Yost, et al. [19] Deflection behaviour of concrete flexural members reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcing bars is investigated. It is recognized that serviceability plays a significant role in the design of GFRPreinforced concrete beams. Therefore, accurate modelling of flexural stiffness is critical and the effect of influencing parameters must be considered. This study accounts for variations in concrete strength fc¢, reinforcement density r, and shear span-depth ratio (av / d). Experimental results from 48 simply supported concrete beams reinforced with GFRP are compared with ACI Committee 4400 s published deflection model. The ACI 440.1R model is found to overestimate the effective moment of inertia, and an appropriate modification is presented. Brahim Benmokrane et al. [20] Accelerated aging tests are being conducted on more than 20 types of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcing bars, which are produced from different combinations of constituent materials, manufacturing parameters, sizes and shapes, and surface coatings. The specimens are being sub-
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312
5
B. Ramesh et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Flexural strength (7days) 30 Norwati Jamaluddin Zeeshan Adib Ahmed N/mm2
25
Adams Joe D. Indu
20
YAO Wu Matha Prasad Adari
15
James E. O. Ovri 0 0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
R.Vasumathi M.Mithra
% of materials
Fig. 3. Flexural Strength of 7 days for the all Fiber Reinforced Self- Compacting Concrete.
Flexural strength (28days) 30 Norwati Jamaluddin Zeeshan Adib Ahmed
25
Adams Joe D. Indu
N/mm2
20
YAO Wu Matha Prasad Adari
15
James E. O. Ovri T.Sravana Sandhya R.Vasumathi
10
M.Mithra 0 0
0.5
1
1.5
% of materials
2
2.5
Shahana Sheril . Rubini
Fig. 4. Flexural strength of 28 days for the all fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete.
jected to various sustained tensile loading (22 to 68% of ultimate strength) in three types of alkaline environments: NaOH, simulated pore-water solution, and embedded in concrete. Time to rupture or residual strength, as applicable, have been determined. Additionally, stress corrosion mechanisms were evaluated by various microstructural analyses. The results showed clearly that alkaline ions and moisture could penetrate or diffuse through the resin (or through cracks and voids) to the interphases and the fibers. For GFRP bars embedded in moist concrete under various sustained stress levels, three types of stress corrosion mechanisms have been identified: stress dominated, crack propagation dominated, and diffusion dominate. Mohamed Safi, et al. [21] A new type of structural columns is being developed for new construction. They are made of
concrete-encased fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) tubes. The concrete-filled FRP tubes are cast in place. The tube acts as a formwork, protective jacket, confinement, and shear and flexural reinforcement. It can also be used to complement or replace conventional steel reinforcement of the column. This paper presents the results of experimental and analytical studies of the performance of concrete columns confined with carbon and glass FRP composite tubes. Concrete-filled FRP tubes are instrumented and tested under uniaxial compressive load. Test variables include type of fiber, thickness of tube, and concrete compressive strength. Results show that external confinement of concrete by FRP tubes can significantly enhance the strength, ductility, and energy absorption capacity of concrete. Equations to predict the compressive strength and failure strain, as well as the entire stress–strain
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312
6
B. Ramesh et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
curve of concrete-filled FRP tubes, were developed. Comparison between the experimental results and those of analytical indicates that the proposed model provides satisfactorily predictions of ultimate compressive strength, failure strain, and stress–strain response. The study shows that the available models generally overestimate the strength of concrete confined by FRP tubes, resulting in unsafe design. P.V. Vijay, et al. [22] This paper presents bending behaviour of rectangular concrete beams reinforced with sand-coated and ribbed glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars including failure mode delineation and deformability response. Discussion on the bending behaviour of the GFRP reinforced concrete members includes the influence of strength, stiffness, and geometric properties of concrete and GFRP bars. In addition, the limit state of energy absorption is established, which is a ratio of energy absorption at ultimate failure of GFRP reinforced concrete beams under bending to that at a limiting serviceability curvature. The energy absorption concept including the limit state has been introduced herein; this satisfies the curvature limit state so that the deflection and crack-width limit states can be unified and deformability factors established to avoid catastrophic failures. Antonio De Luca, et al. [23] Glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars are emerging as a valuable option as internal reinforcement for concrete structures, particularly when corrosion resistance or electromagnetic transparency is sought. GFRP bars, however, are typically not allowed as compression reinforcement in current design guidelines. An experimental campaign on fullscale GFRP reinforced concrete (RC) columns under pure axial load was undertaken using specimens with a 24 24 in. (0.61 0.61 m) square cross section. The study was conducted to investigate whether the compressive behavior of longitudinal GFRP bars impacts the column performance, and to understand the contribution of GFRP ties to the confinement of the concrete core, and to prevent instability of the longitudinal reinforcement. The results showed that the GFRP RC specimens behaved similarly to the steel RC counterpart, while the spacing of the ties strongly influenced the failure mode. The table discussed about the relation between flexural strength for 7 days and 28 days from the various articles. The relation between Flexural strength and material adding percentage shown in Fig. 1 from various articles. From that maximum flexural strength obtained at 1.5% by K. Rubini et al. Flexural strength increases with weight percentage. Flexural strength is maximum at 28 days compare to the 7 days. That was observed by the Manohar et al., (See Figs. 2, 3 and 4). 3. Conclusion The analysis from the literature on the comparison of river sand and M Sand for 7 days and 28 days. The outcomes from the literature shows the compressive strength is gradually increasing by adding the percentage of fiber. But when compared with R sand, the difference in the strength in M sand is comparatively low. The results concluded that like R sand, M- sand shows good strength and recommended for low cost of construction, with manufacture sand of SCC. CRediT authorship contribution statement B. Ramesh: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration. V. Gokulnath: Resources, Data curation, Validation, Investigation. V. Vijayavignesh: Methodology.
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. References [1] Shahana Sheril P.T. Ghousia College of Engineering, Ramnagaram, Karnataka, 2013, self-compacting concrete using fly ash and glass fibre, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT) 2(9) (2013) IJERT IJERT ISSN: 2278-0181. [2] K. Rubini, An Experimental Study on Self-Consolidating Concrete with Silica Fume and Glass Fibre, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT) 5 (12) (2016), http:// www.ijert.org ISSN: 2278-0181 IJERTV5IS120296. [3] Manohar, Strength characteristics of glass fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete with fly ash and silica fume, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT) 4 (08) (2015) 2015, ISSN: 2278- 0181. [4] M.K. Haridhara et al., Influence of Glass Fiber on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Self Compacting Concrete, IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci. 80 (2017) (2004) 012004. [5] M. Kasthuri, A. Harini, et al., Comparison between Strength and Durability of Glass Fibre Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete with Normal Concrete, 6(2) (2017) ISSN(Online) : 2319-875. [6] K. Rajeshkumar, N. Mahendran, Experimental Studies On Strength, Durability And Behaviour of Beam Using SCC With E.GLASS Fibre Strands. ISSN:22780181 2(4) (2013) [7] Norwati Jamaluddin, Ahmad Farhan Hamzah, Mohd Haziman Wan Ibrahim, Ramadhansyah Putra Jaya, Fresh Properties and Flexural Strength of SelfCompacting Concrete Integrating Coal Bottom Ash, doi:10.1051/C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 201/0 0 (201)conf 201 MATEC Web Conferences, 2016. [8] Zeeshan Adib Ahmed, Dr. S.H. Mahure, High Strength Self-Compacting Concrete using Fly Ash, 4(VIII), August 2016 IC Value: 13.98 ISSN: 2321-9653 [9] Adams Joe, Kanmalai Williams, Rao K. Shrinath, Experimental Study on Flexural Behaviour of Self Compacting Steel Fibre Concrete, The 2013 world congress on advances in structural and mechanics(ASEM13), jeju, Korea, September 8-12-2013 [10] R. Elangovan Indu, Optimum Mix Proportioning of High Strength SelfCompacting Concrete, Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. (IJETT) 37 (6) (2016). [11] Wu Yao, Flexural Strength and Behavior of Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams, J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed. 17 (2) (2002). [12] Matha Prasad Adari, Prof. E.V.Raghava Rao, D.Sateesh, An experimental development of m40 grade self-compacted concrete & comparison in behaviour with m40 conventional concrete [Adari*, 4.(9): September, 2015] ISSN: 2277-9655 (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785. [13] James E. Ash, O. Ovri, Ovie P. Umukoro, The Compressive and Flexural Strengths of Self Compacting Concrete Using Rice Husk, Int. J. Adv. Mater. Res. 1 (3) (2015) 80–85, http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ijamr. [14] T. Sravana Sandhya, Venkata Narsireddy Sagili, Mohammed Hussain, Flexural strength of self-compacting concrete, Int. J. Eng. Techniques – 4(2), Mar – Apr 2018 ISSN: 2395-1303 http://www.ijetjournal.org Page 217 [15] R. Vasusmitha, P. Dr, Srinivasa Rao, Strength And Durability Study Of High Strength Self Compacting Concrete, Int. J. Mining, Metallurgy Mech. Eng. (IJMMME) 1 (1) (2013), ISSN 2320–4060 (Online). [16] M. Mithra, P. Ramanathan, P. Muthupriya, R. Venkatasubramani, Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Self Compacting Concrete Containing GGBFS, Int. J. Eng. Innovative Technol. (IJEIT) 1 (4) (April 2012), ISSN: 2277-3754. [17] K.A. Jagadeesh, E. Ramesh Babu, Flexural strength of self compactimng concrete with silica fume and polypropylene fibres with and without reinforcement, Int. J. Adv. Technol. Eng. Sci. www.ijates.com 02(07), July 2014 ISSN (online): 2348–7550 [18] J.J. Beaudoin, Handbook Of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete, Principles, Properties, Developments And Applications, Accession Number: 00642758, ISBN: 0815512368, February 1994. [19] Joseph Robert Yost, Shawn P. Gross, David W. Dinehart, Effective Moment of Inertia for Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Concrete Beams, 100(6), January 2003 [20] Brahim Benmokrane, Peng Wang, Habib Rahman, Durability of Glass FiberReinforced Polymer Reinforcing Bars in Concrete Environment, 6(3), August 2002 [21] Mohamed Saafi, Houssam Toutanji, Zongjin Li, Behavior of Concrete Columns Confined with Fiber Reinforced Polymer Tubes, 96(4), January 1999. [22] P.V. Vijay, Hota V.S. GangaRao, Bending Behavior and Deformability of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Members, 98(6) (2001). MS No. S-2009-092.R2 received and reviewed under Institute publication policies, American Concrete Institute. August 2009. [23] Antonio De Luca, Fabio Matta, Antonio Nanni, Behaviour of Full-Scale Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforced Concrete Columns under Axial Load, ACI Struct. J. 107 (5) (2010), MS No. S-2009-092.R2 received and reviewed under Institute publication policies, American Concrete Institute. August 2009.
Please cite this article as: B. Ramesh, V. Gokulnath and V. Vijayavignesh, A review on fiber reinforced self compacting concrete addition with M-Sand, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.312