A short note on forty patients treated by systematic desensitization

A short note on forty patients treated by systematic desensitization

Bchav.Ra. & Therapy. 1970.Vol. 8. pp. 219to220.Pergamon Rcrr. Printed in England A short note on forty patients treated by systematic (Received 8 D...

91KB Sizes 4 Downloads 57 Views

Bchav.Ra. & Therapy. 1970.Vol. 8. pp. 219to220.Pergamon Rcrr.

Printed

in England

A short note on forty patients treated by systematic (Received 8 December

desensitization

1969)

FORTY patients, 20 male and 20 female, were referred to the author for behaviour therapy. The age range was from 17 to 57, and the I.Q. range was from 83 to 131. On the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale (Taylor, 1953), the scores ranged from 7 to 46, and on the Maudsley Personality Inventory (Eysenck, 1956), the Neuroticism score for the group ranged from 5 to 48, and the Extraversion score ranged from 2 to 41. Despite wide variation in individuals, the group as a whole may be considered as being of slightly above average intelligence, within the normal range for extraversion, but having high neuroticism and anxiety scores. All patients were treated by Wolpe’s (1958) method of systematic desensitization, and relaxation was induced by hypnosis or by intravenous injections of Methohexitone sodium. A carefully constructed hierarchy was prepared for each patient. The patients suffered from phobias (12), sexual disorders (9). stuttering (I), alcoholism (9), drug addiction (7). gambling (I) and war neurosis (1). The outcome on discharge was that, of the 40 patients, 30 showed marked improvement, 5 showed slight improvement, and 5 no change. This would indicate a marked improvement rate of 75 per cent, and if one adds the patients who showed slight improvement, this gives a total improvement rate of 87.5 per cent. The patients who do not seem to have benefited from the therapy were four heroin addicts and the compulsive gambler. As a result of a follow-up one year later, it was seen that of the 30 patients rated as “markedly improved” on discharge, 28 or 93 per cent maintained their improvement. With the exception of the heroin addicts and the compulsive gambler, all the patients benefited to some degree from systematic desensitization therapy. The patients who made a good response to systematic desensitization were those who suffered from phobic disorders, various types of sexual disorder, alcoholism and those addicted to “soft drugs”.

TABLE

1. OUTCOME 0~ DISCHARGE OF 40 PATIENTS TREATED BY SYSTEMATICDESENSITIZATION

Diagnostic

categories

Marked improvement

Slight improvement

No change

Phobias (N = 12)

9

3

0

Alcoholism (N = 9)

9

0

0

Drug (a) (b) (c)

addiction (N = 7) Barbiturates Drinamyl Heroin

I 2 0

0 0 0

0 0 4

Compulsive gambling (N = 1)

0

0

I

Sexual disorders (N = 9) (a) Frigidity (b) Premature ejaculation Cc) Sexual perversions

4 2 1

2 0 0

0 0 0

S/urferirIg

1

0

0

I

0

0

30

5

5

(N = I)

War neurosis (N = I) Total

219

‘20

LE-IIJZRS TO THE EDITOR TABLE 2.

FOLLOW-UP RESULTS ONE YEAR .AFTER DISCHAftCE

&larked improvement maintained

Murked improvemenr (N = 30) Slight improvement (N = 5) No improvement (X=5) Total

Slight improvement maintained

SO

change

Not

contacted

2s 0 0

2 , 0

0 2 4

0

78

‘4

6

2

I

I

Tot.1 KR,AFT

Claybury Hospital Woodford Bridge, Essex

REFERENCES EYSENCK H. J. (1956)

113-140. TAYLOR J. (1953) WOLPE J. (1958)

The quexionnairz

A personality Psychotherapy

measurement

of nenroticism

and extraversion.

Riv. psicol.

scale of manifest anxiety. J. abnorm. sot. Psycho/. 48, 285-290. by Reciprocal Inhibition. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

50,