A spectrum stripping method for the computer-coupled activation analysis of unknown samples by γ-ray spectrometry

A spectrum stripping method for the computer-coupled activation analysis of unknown samples by γ-ray spectrometry

AwoJylica Chimico Acla Publishing Company. in The Ncthcrlmds Elsevlcr Printed 349 Amsterdam A SPEC’I-I...

618KB Sizes 0 Downloads 20 Views

AwoJylica Chimico Acla

Publishing Company. in The Ncthcrlmds

Elsevlcr

Printed

349

Amsterdam

A SPEC’I-I
Rapid 1)s

y-K14

ill-c

ilVililill)lc.

Siklll])lC

instrunwntal

of

Of tllc

:llltl

part,

tllc

Of

of

results

cast

of

IX!CilUSC nature

witli

il

i\ y-ray

isotopes.

Several these

of

met.

at

CC cd.”

and

metlids

spcctruin tlie

a ~1liljOI’ with

coniph

It Wit11

IElst

few

i1

)IilVC

of

discussed

sonic

procedures

.‘-I”

hen

VillllCS,

of

tllat

spcc’tra IC’.’

if

Will

.’ in

tlIC

f down

un.wsIm ted

or the

of

nown

ON

UIlCO’l

ICVCIS

tllc

f’.

cutc’e-

stlcavn

of tlic y-r;,)’

Alifts

)I

Irltd

Of

I1 iti(:lli~

rc\*icwctl

lXC~:lltly

‘I’lic

of the

OfI

llot

Vi1ryillg

counting.

least-squares

lens

sarllplcs

is

Colll-

the

*iin

lnfi

I tl

n-

Icrns

.tt1

1). proi

&:. .a

and

preSt!nt

nxdlod,

tlie

pllotopenk

library

which

is

is pedd likely wllich

l>itSC
provisions could

witli

IInvc

viiryirlg

conditions

gain

d;lti1

illt~lOU6~1 several

but

been

use<1

tlcgrecs

in

tllc

SUCCCSS.

of

il

IlC

I

0:

,L. Nay ideal stripping have 1’ AKIJERS ,\sI) BI:A>IEI<~ Ilnvc rcportcd tlmt a “slli~clow pe;tk stringent

consiclerablc spectrum

saniplc

etc.

SpXtril

instance.

For

WllC!n

incorporates

stripping

Iaowcvcr,

is recorded

ground

ilIlt

inulticoniponcnt

cases,

rC?SUltS

tlic

S;;llllplCs

of of

tiic

ilS

from cacll

howcvcr,

prescncc

number

spwtronietry.

of

EMI~I<\-

tile

large

of

clioscn illltl

tlic

ilCtUZ\l

inetliod,

arId

wcigilt

rlletllocls.

;inalysis

of

nutnbcr

least-scluares

tllesc

y-ray

spcctronictcr

unsuspcctccl linear

Iilrgc

a

tllc

ilClliCVC.

2. It

aiial~liis tllc

y-ray

colnp~nc~~ts

clclllctlts

to

usccl’o

witll

tllc of

authors,

often

activntecl

iiiulticoliiponcnt of

cooling

difficult

ICilSt-SqU;lWS

shifts,

when

by

niorc

tllc

t Ire

Si111I)>lCS tccliniqucs

;Lfl unknown

contrilmtions

rlIiltly

ICilSt-S(lUilN?S

ant1 hSc-Iin42

il~lillyZCt1

WllC?Il

occur

tlw

niorc by

is

‘IIIC

ones

activation, spcctrul

COlll]X~lXblC

quite

mi.sturcs.

cxpcctcd

arc

Villi
arc

gain

Of

which

of

for

is tile

in

dctcrll~ini~tiorl

\vciglits

unknown

reduction

S}XXtril

ttie

SugKcStcd

cm2

arc

synthetic

of

Spcutrunl,

rnCtllodS tllc

wllicll

i~l>sc~~ccof

Ixen

niisetl is

tllc

of

(lilta of

lil)rxy

; (2)

iIViLililblC!1~‘5

sclcctcti

Wliilbk

illl;llySiS tlW

using

IitrgC! nuinbcr

;I

if

C0llCcIltriLti0ll

using

mmsurenwnt

Sc\*crill

assumptions

yield

cornlmtcr

IXlrilllll!tCrS

tcchiiiquc

ccrtai11

(f)

SillI~~)l~

tllC

tile

tllc

tllc

clerncntal

SiLIll~~IL’

IllctllOtlS

Ollly

tllC

IXlrtS:

Of

ZlllillySiS

pKlCtiCil1

Of

tW0

Ili1nlcly

cx~tll~xm21lts fitting

IX

ilCti\‘ilt~
one Of tllc scvcr;il ClClllClltS Iwcscnt in 1mrators

CillI

hI~ilSU~clll~llt

consists

spxtruni

first

;lctiviLtion

S~XXtr~~lIlCt~~

yield

f
off

sllifts. to

fIYJll1

\JC ZLffCCteCl

ilfC

ncitlicr

on

tllc

“pxling

to

correct

txttcr

a COlIIpkS

Equally

for

true

is

by

l&r&!

smootllcd tCC~llliC~UC”

gain

shifts,

SpeCtrUln

the

fact

if

tllat

StatiStiCal nor

weiglitcd

llscd

by

counting

tk

SpCtrUttl

unscrambling scatter

in

properly. previous statistics,

tllc ‘I’llC

aUtllorS, back-

results.

R71uf.

Cltinr.

Ada.

38 (1967)

349-356

.S/~ectr~m

~rocctfrrrc.s

sCri/)pirrg

‘!‘!lC

f~!!(J\Vill~

I~lulticoin!~oncnt (f) nuclitlcs

For

any

(!il,rrlry

t;ikcn

for

iwing svstctn

IllCilSUrl!
tlic

counting

s;iIiic

Icrigtll

of

xctivatctl

s>‘stcin.

tilllc

arc

of

l)ure

OlItilitl

tlicsc

iis

tlic

computer

analysis

c,f tlic

s;iIiI!)!c.

f~f il nunilwr

slwctra

of r;lt!hJ-

!)ilCkg:r~JUIll! ~!lOu!t!

.Xiltur;l!

intcrcst.

;l!So IN:

cx~ulltccl. (witli known wcigllts) of tlw clcmcnts time ant! c~orintC~~1in tllit s;ime counting slwc:trurii (JI tllc sxnii: !c*rigt!l of time i<

riltli0lIUc:!i
:~ntl tlic stancl;irtls for a known A n;itiir;\! I,;ic-k~rcJun(l

;lc.ti\*:ltcc!

/II,,..

for

wn!~!c~ycd

tlic

wliic*!~ arc

s!)cctr;l)

for any (.j)

13acli

of

tlic

S!Wl:tril,

inc*!u
tlio

fitting ii tliirtl or
l)y

rnctl1oc!

(4) Ixiscd

It’,, tllc

~ivcn

arc of

wcrc:

t;lkcIl.

sInoot!ictl tlic

s!JcctruIl~

‘I’IIC s;~lnp!cs

(2)

a~lsc,

!“““!
y-ray

rclittiOT1

II,’ , = 1 +

I/I

Ii;itur;l!

Ixlc~k~:rc~lliIc!

t!lrOug!l

;l writs

wc:i~!itct!

of

usinK

s!Jcx:trilI1l, 5 (IZltil

;i

is

!xJints

wc4gliiinC:

for i!~t~*!Ic:ll~ltlllc:! l’ollllt,

il5

tlicll using

factor, Kivcn

(f~,/C,)I<)lJ~~

I)!

(I)

tllc c3)llIlts in clw~nc!! i ilnt! nl= I’(.*I. ‘I’tw rcslwc.tivc naturrl! Ixlc:k~rount! is tllcn suld rxtctl frcltn O~C!I t jf tlw ;lllOVC Sicilll!
(,‘I

is

(5)

~~TY~pXlll

ci3cr;‘wtl

:‘S

Iiltcr.

I~rotn

tlic

sliiftctl

st;lIit!;trc!

S!wctrutn

Cl/C,,

ratios

;lrl:

counts in tlw it!1 cllmnc! ant1 (.‘,, is tllilt in tllc !w;tk cl~annc!. l;roln tlicse ratios , 11~1tlw counts in tlw rcslwc.tivc !wak c!l;mncl of tllc sampIt! slxxtrum, :I )‘-rily slw. t111m of tllat coil1!~oIlcnt is p!ncratrrc! ant! tllcn sul)tractc!t! from t!lC! conilxAtc slx:trtir~i. ‘!‘!iis gcllcrilti(JlI illlt! sucwssiw sul,tr;iction of tlllt spectra is c~wtinucd until 111~~ ~llilr;lc.tlrI~i?;tic: s!wc*tI*liti~ of tlil* c!cnsirc*c!clcllicnt is ~wc~lot! off.

rwasurcd.

\~!~cIv f I I:. tllc

‘I’IIC scalctl

U!)

grount!

as

y-WY !ly

slwtrutll

IllU!ti!>!ic~iltioIi

clcscrilml

allow.

01 tllc wit11 If.

!Jy

i\ctiViltl_!t! tllc

St;lll~!ilIX!

\vcigl:lltiIig

viSu:l!

Of

factor

till2

atid

~!SillnilliltiOll,

~ll2Ill~:llt

is

ccxmx*tc
for

il11 iln!)urit>p,

SlllOlJtllC!ll, tlic

Ixlck-

front

citlwr

sainplc clmtilillcr or
tlW

of

following xl

tllc

rcs!xxtivc

!~~lSt-SC~U~lWS

(k-lk -fl,‘

stanclard, fl~rllllllil

iI:ilIiil~izinc: for

il siiiK!c

tlw

cliffcrcnrc

~0lll!~Oll~tlt

htwccn

its

of !mrc

tile two 11)

:

.fllc) .v’lk = c)

~vhC!rC \‘lk rcpx!nts t!K! umnts in t!il! it!1 c!limtlc! clement /2 in tlic saniplc xnt! pr is tlic! !woportion

tllc: \VilS

(2) Of

t!lc

Shirdard,

.rlk

t!lOSe

of tlw St~tltli~rtl spectrum

dw

t0

of tlic

elenwnt k in tlw sample. From this prop0rtion, stantlnrd wxl the pr\r,?mctcrs usecl for activation elcnicnt in the sarnplc is computed.

tlic weight of tlic clctnent nncl counting, tlic weight

in tlic of the

‘J’lw complete computer progrrrtn usictl for the ilCtiVi\tiOn nndysis of tllC unknown SilltlI)le by tlw spectrum stripping mctlwtl is dcscrilxxl clsewlwrel~. The main pr0gr;lfll, coded in Fortrzm I\’ for nn IB!U 709_1 computer. consists of a group of sulxoutincs wliicli ni:ly lx c;tllcd in tlrc Jx0Jxr scqucncc to Jwrform the ViLlh.ls oJ)criltionS sucll iIS smootliing, weighting, sJwctrum striJ>JGng, etc., ricccssary for the clctcrmination of tlic elcmcnt;d conwntration in the s;~niplc. Only the “Subroutine SIM” wltiicll is usctl tc) sirnulxtc tlic pure spcctrutn of eac11 coniponcnt is dcscrilxxl in tllis section. In ~encrating tlw pure spcctruni. if tllc ;lCtUill IWilk cllilnncl?; 0f tile S:1lllplc spectrum i\lX! not tllc s;Llllc: ;is tllosc of tllc lihxry sJJcctr:l, it is llcCCSSi\r!J to correct for tllc gziiti drift 1’4’ sllifting, one ilt il timct, c;wli lih;iry slwctrum in Sucli ;1 wily tllilt tllc Jxomincnt ~)llotol~~i~ks of tlw dcsirctl clement in tllc lilxwy ant1 tllc snmple ;lrc ;Ilignc
J

=

I’,, I’”

---

*

i

wlwrc I’,, is tllc tlcsirccl lw;ik cll;lnncl in tllc sarnlh spectrum, I,, tlw rcspcctivc Jwak illld i tllc CllilIltlCl niimbcr of tllc librxry slwctrum. ‘J’lw ;lssunlptions inherent in tllis Jwoccclurc ilrc’: (I) tlicrc is no rcli\tiVC drift in tlw first clxmncls of the lilxwy :\llcl SillllplC! SlWCtril, illld (2) 111(?drift rclationsl~ip is IillCilr. \\‘itll tllc comJ>utccl cllzuincl nulnlwrs A 1, ;111ilrr;ly r)f counts 1’1 is formed by ilssUlninff il 1inc;lr rcliltionsliip bct\WCn tllc counts for t\Vo il(lj~c’CIlt pSCUd0 clianricl llUllll~c~1~~ in tlli: il?Til~ A. Since tllC iirrX1y A is in tlic form of flXCtiOnil1 Clliln?lCl numlxxs, FLunit CllilllnCl nunilwr /(isclcfincd ;\S 1J I < /c < .‘I 1, 1 illl(l tllc! nuliih!r Of counts yk for cllil!lncl k is 0ldilind from tllc rcrhtion :

CllilIlIl~l

Y,, = <;, +

(’c--.4(A ,)(CI-A I--c,) I) I

(4)

1b I

wlicrc <.*I :incl (‘,111 rcprcscnt resJwAivcly.

tlw counts

for

tlw

pscuclo

cllanncls

rll

illltl AI+I,

A rrtr(vsis of syri thctic wixtrtrcs Jiisturcs wit11 known zmiounts of the components wcrc JxX!JXlrTly conncctccl to an RIDI, 40o-cllnnnel J~u~schcigllt nnalyacr. The spcctm of nil the stanch& were checked zinc1 in n few cnscs the impure spectra were stripped of tlic impurity ilS described above. One spectrum of cwli standnrd wr?s used ns n lilxxry spectrum ant1 the otlicr ;w a compiir~tor

Jf. P. MLSOS,

352

I). w.

I3IsI
Figure 1 illustrates how tllc spectrum of the standard for wcigllt dctcrmimltion. de&cd component is obtained from the mixed spectra by successive s’ripping. It is interesting to see from tliis I:ig. tllat tllc rcsitlual bremsstrahlung spectrum from the mixture overlaps tllc pure spectrum of plioslhorus wllicl, is a p-emitter. ‘I’llc results of tlw analysis of tlic syntlwtic mixtures using tlw stripping metlmd arc given in ‘Table I and comparwl witli the values obtained by the least-squares mctlIod. Except -__- .--

12

I ‘.‘-‘-’

‘I .‘--

___

I”‘-

.___. ___..

I---’

____

IO

._. ,_ ..- - ._._‘,..__.. -.._.,-UNKNOWN MlXTURE P94Omg Br l 2opJ No l IOOpg UNKNOWN -No

-

UNKNOWN

..‘.s.

P LIBRARY

-No

1 I _/

- Br I

(P*40mgl

2

a

08

0

I2

I6 ENERGY

20

24

28

32

(HoV)

in tlic case of potassium and mercury tllcrc is good agreement lxtwccn the values obtained using botll Inetllods. ‘I’lw large diffcrcncc bctwecn tlw results for potassium obtained from least squaws antI tliosc from thd stripping rnctliotl is probably due to an error in tllc wcigllt of potassium in tlw standard. However, tllis does not affect tlir: hsic nietlwl, Iwcausc tlic results of potassium analysis of rcplicatc llny samples seem to l~c consistent witllin cspcrimcntnl errors (see Table II). It is obvious from Tnblc I that tlw stripping metlwtl apparently yields better results for the annlysis of mercury, wliicli procluccs a y-emitter up011 iKtiViltiou with thermal neutrons, \VCill<

tllilll

tllC!

Icast-sclurwcs

111~tllOtl.

One of tllc problems cncountcrctl in tlw itctiV;~tiOll analysis of bromine obtnincd for rcsitlucs in plant materials 13 was tllilt tllc bromiIic content some of tlic samples using tllc AA-G ICiISt-SClIl;lrCS program1 was found to lw larger for tllC earlier countings tllilll tllc Values ObtiLiIlCtl litter in tllc tlCCiLy. ‘This bchvior was not, Ilowcvcr, rcflcctccl in the values ol)tninccl for soclium ancl pOti~SSiuI~1. Since the amount of bromine in tlIese sarnplcs was in tlw range of 5-20 p.p.m., it is lHYhi~l>l~ that vial ilnpuritics such ns sodium and col)pcr which produce rclativcly sllortcrlived activities than Hzl3r, can make the bromine values appear larger in tllc car11 pesticide

Amal.

Cliiw:.

Acln,

jH (13G7)

349-356

353 '1'/\I3l,EI COsf1'ARtSOS or

Tllli

LKAST-SQUAl
l’l~OCI~I>Ul
IIlcSUI.TS

1’011

OIlTAlNlcI) ,\SlJ

Till:

STI~II’I’IS~;

Till:

ASALI’SIS

01’

hll.xTUllI‘;S

..-...

_.

. ~O?lJ,MJtJCJJtS fhC*

I\‘PJIHI~~J

OJ

PJliXtJlW

ruCi~1Jf.s

0)

I~rsltIlS

C0WjXJlJCJJf.~

t/JE

_ . .

_

I’

ltJC

Sqll”Y”S

_

.._

(JJJK) _._

0.

ljr

0.02.0

100

.-

o.oro,~

O.rJlO

c-Jooc>;

Si& I< Ijr

0. IO0 I ..(f)(J O.OOJO

0.0().5.) I .S”CJl 0.00 I OS

sa I<

0. 100 J ..I’)(’

O.CJC)7.j

l)r

O.OO.!O

1.5745 0.00 I’).(

s;c

0.

0.

I00

IO.3

I ..I()(,

t’r

O.SOl’

.jo.js 0. .,nc).I

sa

0. I00

C>.OC).l7

I

(J.*jfr_5

.?

0..1”5~

3

0..7”9.3 cJ.*7X(cJ ‘J._jfJ_jO 0.j jrr, 0. _jf1.(2

4 5 0 7

I

I11

all C;\scs tllc

SpXtK~l

I ..,

I .)b

.3(,(,.S .312.4 .3.34.5 275.1

.3WLN

lS..Z_) 15.‘)’

‘5.15 13.07

14.27

.34S-8 .3.50. .? .2c,n. I

I S.C’l

I .I .faC,

I.3.‘5

tn.75

1(I.00

’ 7.50

.q I().0

J-1 I 4 ,307.l

15,s.;

I S.0” I S.2”

11.30 IS.00

I5..3” __-_-

I3.‘)0 .L

.3 1s..3 :L .jr tl;htil for

-__.

~,.00_5f’

IO

277.4 LL 312.5

Avcri1Kc

..-

I

I .a(‘)” 0.0

.

I

I<

IIK

sfrippiJJg

_

o.rJrc).j

Ijr

llrc

/JJJhP)

O.rN)_).)

_. O.O.lH7

._ ..-

CJbtaiJrcd

_~..

._0. 105.3

o.oy’

.jo.oo

Ii

THE

lJlCt~JOd

-._---..__._

sir

1’

JtSiIJ&’

fCClSllJJl’thOda

.-.

.$O.“O

Sil.

USISC

-.

iccslclts

obtrliJJc*tf

ltSJJJ&’

1JJJ6)

*

sYsT1113T1c

~11:11101)

I O..(O

3(,1.2 1.-_ ..3.)2.H-&3.) Cl1;11111cls 2S-zoo

If).‘2 ---.--1o.rn:i_

wcw

usccl

for

1.1

I I .a$)

I S.O.( :l:O.f>

tl1c co111lJiJt;1tio11

I.)..3o~:o.q

of tl1c

\vcigllts.

runs wlicn tlwse inipuritics arc not properly acwuntctl for in the hst-squares rncthod. It sl~oulcl lx pointed out that the o.gr-MeV peak of (J*JCu can hardly lx distinguishccl from tile 0.55-IMCV y-ray peak of “*13r for a visual identification of tlic traces of copper in the samlh. Since the 0.78-McV peak of H213r may lx used to sitnulAr~rtl.

ClJiJJJ.

rfcln,

38

(1367)

349-356

ate its y-ray sJwctrum in tlw successive stripping prowclurc, any contribution from H2Hr activity may Ix ~rvoiclcd. WZu to tile InCilsUrCInCnt of rcccivctl fVJm tllc c’.S.D.A., Scvcn replicates of one of tlic Ilily satnplcs C;ulfport, \vCrC irratli;~tctl, toK:ctIier wit11 cluplicatcs of sodium, JXJtiWGiuI~l and hotninc standards, in tllc rwctor for about 8 Jl at a neutron flux of illIOllt 10” n cm-2 ilftC1 sufficient cooling, in were counted, ‘I’llcsc salllJ’JCs antI tllc StilnCli~KlS see-‘. tllc same counting system as tlcscribctl Iwforc. IInalysis of tllc clata \VilS pcrformccl using botll tltc Icast-sclu;lrcs and tlic qJcctrutn stripping computer Jwogralns. Figure 2 SJIOWS tJw rcSitJU;lJ sJwc:trutn after SUcwSSiVC StriJ’Jkg of CWII Of tllct cc~rTlporIcnts,

SIMULATED

6

including tllat of tllc Iwclniiiw st;~riclwtl. It ilJ’J)l!ilrS from tllis Fig. tllirt tlwrc arc some ilnl>uritic:s wllicli can Ilnrclly Iw itlcntificcl in tlic composite spcctruin of tllc snmplc. ‘I’llc rcs\llts of tllc r?llill~SCS Of tllCsC Silllll)lCS for sodium, potassium ilIlt brorllinc c)l)ti\illCtJ using tJlc sJxxtrutl1 StriJJJlill~ mctJlotJ arc C(~ll~JX\rC!dill ‘I‘illJJC I I Wit11 tJlC WSJWcti\T! VilIUCS fro111 tllc JCilSt-S(JUilrCS JXOpXlll.

It CiLIl IJCSW11 ftX~111 ‘TilbICS J iIllping IlWtJlOd iS CIS

STI~II’I’ISC

SI’ECTItt’Sl

IS ,\CTl\‘,\‘l’IC~S

,\S.\I.\‘SIS

355

rnetl1od in idc;d cilscs. Howcvcr, if the sample cont;hw unol~servable

tlie former seems to bc impurities for whkl1 no library data can tw furnish1 for tlic Icast-squares an;Ilysis. One need not even USC the entire spcctrurn for comparison, hit instead nicasurc the arm under tlic lm-miincnt JAiotopcak of tlic striJ3pecl spcctruni much mow Jmxiscly than frown tlic ~011iJh2s sJwArum ancl coinJxwe tliis wit11 tlic Jxtk nrcn of tlic St~IIltli~d (See l:iff. 2). FurtlwrIIlOrC, if tllC iKtiV.?tiOIl JX’OdUct of tJle c]Clllcnt of illtcrcst ]1i1J3]XnS to h.2 a !VCi1k y-cniittcr (I:‘,< 0.25 Me\‘) tlic effect of Immsstralllun~ producccl by tlw p-emitters in tlic sanlJ>lc Call lx considcr;~My reclur*ctl on tlie :llli\l}*SiS of tlii?; clciiwnt l>y resorting to tlic spectrum striJ)J>inK inctl1ocl. An ;ldClctl iltl\~illlt~l~CZ of tJIis lllC!tllOCl is tllilt tlwre is no need for ilcdiVatiI1~ iIll counting tllc stnnchrcls of tllc ~llI~VillltCtl iI1IJ~iiritics hng \Vittl tJlCZSillIlJ)Ic if iL Cilt~l]OjiUC! Of t]lC li]HXry S]XXtra is ;Lvililnlllf?. *l’llC S]NX~tIUlIl striJ)Jiing IIlctlICd will be particxili~rlv ilscful for tllc ilIlillySiS c)f ill1 clclllcllt in tlic “limit-of-scIisitivity*’ t%np? in tllc presence of Illiltris intcrfc~rcIicc~. ‘I’lw activation

pml

as th?

better

Icnst-squares

tl1an

illlill~SiS

tl1c

of

latter

Immiiic

Jx2sticidcS

>*iclcls results of-scnsiti\*it>*”

Lvitll httcr

iIiStruIIicIitnl

tcclIIiiclucs.

‘I’llc

ri\llgc.

‘l‘lii:

corrects of

for

tllc

i.

tlic

c:ounts

c~lIoSc~1i

it

Iiiglicr

iS

not

StilnclilrtlS tllilt

1’ilIl

Of

wciglit

tlliln

cJuito

tllC to

for tllc

fi1Ctor

lWilk tllilt

IIC! C!.KJX_!CtCO\VlICll l‘llC

hckgrouncl

\vill

\VciglItinC:

region

1,.

in

ilccO1lllt

lilx-;irics

tllC?

StiltiSticiIl

IYJ)rMCd in

tlicr

iI

tlw

u~;ccl

rc~ioii.

in

rc~ioii

St;~tiStic*al

tllc

;tc.tivitv filCtOr

tl1:iii

flll~~tUiltiOll~

to

il

tlw

CllCBS;cIl

tllc

iii tllc

tlic: ]“ilk

il

c)nly

c-ountS iii

Jwr

tliit

lx:

in

tlIC

~~llillIll~l

\vlll Jw I00

c-ll;1nnc!l.

ill72

-:I not

of tJIc*

c~oiiIitiIil:

Sta11chrtlS

l)YcscIlt

ancl

fuiicticm

C~~)UlltS

Also of

tllc

lO\vt!l.

tllilll

IIl~:tllclcl

Kivcs

lt!sS

of CilCll sJwc*triil11 \vliic:l~ Ki1.c’s

tltcr Sillllt’ \vciKlltiiIg

C:Ictor

in

tllL*

tllc

slIoulcl InctlIo~l*

\vltcn (.‘I = 100,

x0,000

of

is

otlli!t

c~oIiiInuIiic~iItioI~.

SillIll~lC

uwtl.

“liinit-

wiiic:

iIictlIcxi

tlw

flU~tUiltiOllS 1CVClS

IiltC!r

liictlIcIcl

in tlw

ICilSt-SClU;lrC!:’

of

illS;tiIncC

rc~istcring

no

stril~]~iIiC:

0l~ti~illCYl

lm*sont

t lw

munting

for

tlic

c5Jwci;~lly

tll0sc

bvl~kl1 is niorc oftcil 11’1 = I/(‘, \VlIctrc CI is

IllOrC illlJ~C~rtilllcX2to t]lC! ilZl~l]~*siS;.13csidcs, into

I)C

tllilt

SclUilrCS, \vitlI

f;dor

flllc~tIlilti~~~IlS

r*Ollc*C*iVilbh!

Silllll~lC!. tllc

11’1

f;l\~Orill~l~

~wli~riill~

IX1Ck~:rOUIlCl

Slio\Vs

tllc! Ictnst

\~ci~lItiIi~

f;lC*tor

wciglitin~ is rcJwcsmtc(l tllr!

inatcri;~ls

tlmii

rcsultS

‘I’l1c

‘I‘llUs 11,‘1\lscCl for

times

‘I’lIcS;c!

st;ktistical

ilIlt

plant

(:oIIilxirCfs

\voi~lItinC:

Stalldi1rtlS.

l~lIi\lln~l

i1110

iirl~itraril?*

IiicIitionccl.

in

Jmxi5ion

c~01~1iti11~

Of

is ll~C!tl to t;il;c*

Si;llllJ~lC~

~lll
tllc!

illike.

I)i\*isioii of ISi~tolwS Ih:vitlopinc!nt of ‘I’llc fill~lllc~ii1l sUJq)ort rciitlcrc~tl I>?* tlw U.S. Atomic Eiicrgy Coinmission for tllis \vc)rk ;iii(l tllc fin<* ~‘OO]WTiltiOll of 3lr. I). 1;. J3Al<~l~IIi~l.of tllc L.S.I).rI., (;ulfJmrt in furnislliil/; tllc Ili1v S;iIll]~]Cs arc’ Krl!iltl> ~ipprcciatccl. ‘I’llc :lutliors ilW inclcl~tcd to I)r. i* is ~rntcfull?~ tllo

xc k llowlccl@!d.

A of

SJXXtrUll1

unknown

of the y-ray

striJ,J)ing lYlctllC1tl for ttic C~~lllJ~lltc~r-c:0~~J~l~~l iIctiViltiOl1 illl;ll~SiS sninplcs using y-m>’ sJxxAroinctry is cliscussccl. 13cforc tlic unscxxin_llJinjq is lxxfcmnetl using stzmtlarcl spectra of the ccmponcnts, cncli sJ&truni

is slnootllccl, strltisti(:itlly wciglltcd ;~nd corrwtctl for IxxkgrrJuncl. ‘1’h pllMope:lks of tllc stantl;~rcl spcctr;t ;Irc tllcn aligned wit11 tllc rcspcctive peaks of tllc sitmple spwtrurn, one ilt ;I time aftctr cca-rccting for Kilitl drift if ncccssary, ant1 tllc undcsirctl tllc cllarxtcristic spectrum c:ornp~ncnts arc strilqxxl out. After sucwssivc sui,tr;iction, of tlw tlcsircrl clcnicnt is C~Oll1l1ilr~Cl witll tliat of ttw st;Lncl;trtl to tlctcrrninc its wciglit. ‘1’11~ results cht:iinetl using tllc prcscnt inctllorl arc as f.q~ocl as tlrosc c)bt;~inctl from l)ut ill’l>C?Zlr to lx2 better wlicn i~ssunlldions IcilSt-SflUilrC!S iI1l;llt’SiS in i(lc;Il C:lSCS, irilicrctlt in tl:c IGlSt-S(lUilrC!S lTlctll0tl ilW no IonK:cr Villitl.

011

s;lwr-trt!

clc:c.rit

unc

1iitItlIcItlc

(“SlJwtrum

tl’~C~llill1tillOllS

inconnus

c:;lritctc:risticlu(:

tic l’c~l~incnt

I’illl;ll~SC!

S(III jxjitls.

1.m

rC~SUltiltS

sent

;ltissi

stril)lJing”)

lJil1’

;\c:tivittion.

c:st c-oinlxd I~~ris

clue

~3:u.x

lair

Al>rc\s il wlui ol>tcnus

spcc:trcmC~tric

soustraction cl’un lxw

Ctaloii Ia

in~~tl1Idc

~illlIlllil

Iwur

sticxc5siw, pour tics

IC

ch~tcrmiiicr 1ncJinclrcs

c’illT6S.

1% wirtl cinc ;~l;tivicrullgsir~ll~ll~tiscllc hlctllc~clc cliskuticrt, 1x4 tlc:r unlxknnntc I’rolwn untcr Vcrwcntlung cincs ;,-Sl’“ktrotnctcrs, ths mit cinctn Rccllncr Kckoppclt ist, i~llillySiC!lt wcrclcn. IhXU wwclcii \*orIwr ;o-Spektrcn clcr c:inzclncn I3cstilndtcilc niilwr untersucht untl tlann rnit dcm Sp!ktrurn dcr I’roh vcrgliclwn. Ihrcl1 itufcin;~ntIcrf~~l~:cn~k~Subtraktioncn tlcr SIwktrcn cinzclncr Elcmcntc vtrn clcnon dcr l’rolw iiiittcls clcs I
.s -I 5 0

7

x ‘J

IO I

I

I.:

’ .)