A stereoselective synthesis of cis-alkenylboranes

A stereoselective synthesis of cis-alkenylboranes

c4 Jownat of Oganometaltic Chemistry. 92 (1975) CI-C6 6 Elsevier Sequoia S.A.. Lausanne - Printed in The Netherlands Prehminary communication A STE...

190KB Sizes 17 Downloads 119 Views

c4 Jownat of Oganometaltic Chemistry. 92 (1975) CI-C6 6 Elsevier Sequoia S.A.. Lausanne - Printed in The Netherlands

Prehminary

communication

A STEREOSELECTlVE

EI-ICHI

NEGISHlf.

Department (Received

SYNTHESiS

ROBERT

of Chemistry.

OF cjs-ALKENYLBORAKES

hl. WILLIAMS,

Syracuse

GEORGE

Unicersrty,

Syracuse,

LEW and TAKAO New

York

13210

YOSHIDA (U.SA.)

March 10th. 1975)

The reaction of 1-halo-1-alkynes

ment with either hydride produces manner.

with dialkylboranes followed by treat-

lithium triethylborohydride or potassium tri-s-butylborocis-alkenylboranes in high yields in a highly stereoselective

The cis nature of hydroboration [I] permits the ready formation of alkenylboranes UI which the boron atom and the vlcinal alkyi group are tmns to each other. Using such stereochemlcally defined alkenylboranes. a number of unique olefin syntheses have been developed which provide stereoselective routes to monoolefins [2], cY,P-unsaturatedcarbonyl derivatives [ 31, halides [2;r,4 1, alkenylmercury derivatives [ 51, conjugated dienes and enynes [ 61 and cumulenes [7]. However, the lack of convenient procedures for the synthesis of crs-alkenylboranes has considerably restricted their synthetic applicability. We have found that the reaction of 1-halo-1-alkenylboranes (I) with either lithium hiethylborohydride or potassium tri-s-butylborohydride* produces the desired cis-alkenylbonnes (Ii) in high yields (eqn. 1).

vinyl

RCZCX

HBR

2

R, R’, R” = alkyl,

R

X

MBR’;H

R

BR’,

\

C=C’ / \

H X = halogen, M = LI or K

(II)

+ BR”3

(1)

H

The experimental procedure is quite simple as esemplified by the following preparation of cis-1-hexenylbis(3-methyl-2-butyl)borane (III). To a dry, nitrogen-flushed 300.ml flask equipped with a septum inlet, a magnetic stirring bar and a mercury-sealed outlet were introduced sequentially borane gAtiable from .Xldncb Chemical Co.. Milwaukee. see ref. 8.

WLSCO~SUI. For a review on lbese compounds.

c5

in THF (2.56 AI, 19.6 ml, 50 mmol), 2-methyl-2-butene (7.0 g, 100 mmol, O”, 1 h), freshly distilled 1-iodo-1-hexyne (10.4 g, 50 mmol, O”, 1 h) and lithium triethylborohydride m THF (1.09 Ai, 46 ml, 50 mmol, -25” then warmed to 25” over 1 h). Triethylboranev and THF were evaporated in vacua, and the residue was estracted with petroleum ether. Evaporation of the petroleum ether produced III: NMR (CCL, TMS) 6 0.7-1.15 (m, ca. BlH), 1.15-2.4 (m, ca. 10H) and 5.85-6.05 (m, ca. 2H) ppm. The yield by NMR using benzene as an internal standard was 91%. The essential absence (< 2-3s) of the trans isomer was established by the comparison of the NMR data with those of the tram isomer obtained by the reaction of 1-hexyne with bis(3-methyl-2-butyl)borane which eshibited an entirely different pattern in the olefinic region [NMR (CCL, TMS) 6 0.7-1.15 (m, 21H), 1.15-2.5 (m, lOH), 6.25 (d, lH, J = 18 Hz), 6.5-7.15 (dt, lH, J = 18 and 6Hz) ppm]. The stereochemical results ?Ie consistent with the intramolecular migration of hydrogen from boron to carbon with inversion of configuration at the sp’ hybridized Q carbon center, analogous to the previously observed alkyl mlgratlon [2]. After osidation of a sample of III with sodium hydroxide and 30% hydrogen peroside, GLC examination”” (95% yield) and only a very

indicated

the formation

of 3-methyl-2-butanol

(2% yield) of 2,3_dimethyl-4nonanone which can be formed via the competitive alkyl transfer. This indicates that the migratory aptitude of the hydridic hydrogen relative to that of the 3-methyl-2-butyi group, after correction for the statistical factor, is ca. 100. Quite analogously, IV-VI were obtained in SO-95% yields. minor amount

E[CiiKHjKH(CHj)q;

t-C,P, ‘\

c=c

2

/

Although potassium tri-s-butylborohydride reacts similarly, the ease of removal of triethylborane makes lithium triethylborohydride the reagent of choice. Saline hydrides such as lithium hydride and potassium hydride are not ‘Tnetb~Iborcne IS ~~ro~honc. u-eared wlrh due cauuon.

‘*Henna4

The U-apped solulron cooLarnm~ lnelhylborane

wb~cb was formed as one of he mam products.

was not analyzed

musx tierefore

quantitatwely

be

by GLC.

C6

satisfactory, producing cis-alkenylboranes m much lower yields at much slower rates over the temperature range of -25 to 65’. The remova: of the h-ialkylborane by-product and the inorganic salt may be omitted in many cases in which the crs-alkenylboranes are used as synthetic intermediates. For example, a lo-mmol ahquot of the solution containing 111 obtained as described above was treated with 6 N sodium hydroxide (6.8 ml, 40 mmol), and iodine dissolved in THF was added until the brown color of iodine began persisting for several minutes (ca. 27 mmol). GLC examination indicated the formation of h-ans-2,3dimethyl-Qnonene* in 82% yield (stereoisomeric purity 2 98%). Unlike the previously developed fmns-olefin synthesis via 1-halo-1-alkenylboranes [ 21, the procedure reported here does not involve protonolysis of organoboranes with carbosyiic acids at high temperatures and should be capable of accommodating various acidsensitive functional groups. A unique synthetic application of cis-alkenylboranes is their conversion to conjugated cis-enynes. In a manner analogous to the synthesis of conjugated Crans-enynes [ 6b]. V was converted in a highly stereospecific manner to cis-5,7-dodecenyne* in 51% yield (eqn. 2). 1. LiC=CC,

V

n-C4 Hg

H, .n

in hexane

*\

“,. I, 3. NaOH

,C=CCJ

Hg -n

(2)

>=C’

\

H >

Use of III or IV in place of V resulted lower yields.

H 98%

CIS

in the formation

of the cis-enyne

in

Acknowledgment We thank support.

Research

Corporation

and Syracuse

University

for financial

References 1 H-C. Brorrn. Hydrobonllon. W.A. Benlamm. Inc. Sew Yorh. 1962. 2 (P) G. Zwelfcl. InLmScience Chem. Rep;.. 7 (1973) 181 and ref. cited (b) C. Kdbnch and M.R. hlerkle. Angew. Cbem. InternaL. Ed. En&. 6 (1967) 74: (c) E J. Corey and T. Rarmdra,,athan. J. Amer. Chem. SIX.. 9-l (1972) 4013:(d) E. Negrsht. J.J. Katz sod H.C. Brown. Synthesrs. (1975)

therem:

555:

(e)

C.

Zwetfel

C C. WtuLney.

3 4 5

and

J. Amer.

R.P.

Fuher.

Chcm.

Sot..

IbId..

(1972)

9-l (1952)

557: 6560:

(f) C. Zwetfel.

(6)

H.C.

R.P.

Broun

and

Fuher. N.

J.T.

Rab-indmn.

Sno,v

and

J. Grgano-

metal. Chsm.. 61 (1973) C5: (b) G. Zwetfel and A. Horug. Syn~besas. (1973) 672; (i) G. Zweirel. A. Homg and J.E. Plamondon. J. Amer. Chem. Sot.. 96 (1974) 316. E Ne&b,. G. Lexr and T. Yosblda. J. Org. Chem .39 (1974) 2311. H.C. Brow-n. T. Hamaoha and N. Ravindnn. J. Amer. Chem. Sot.. 95 (19i3) 5786. 6156. (a1R.C. Larcckand H.C. Brown. J. OrwnomeLaL Cbem.. 36 (1972) 1: (b) R.C Larock. S.K. Gupra and H.C. Brown. J. Amer. Cbem. Sot.. 9-l (1971) 4371.

6

(a) E. Negnh~ and ibfd.. (1973) 874.

7 8

T. Yosbida. R.M. S. Knshnamurths. ‘Idenrifted

by

T. Yoshtda. Chrm. Commun.. (1973) 606; (b) E. Negrshi. G. Lew and (c) H.C. 6rovrn end N. Rarxndran. J. Org. Chem.. 38 (1973) 1617. Wdbamsaod Aldnctica

comparing

specti

E. Negisbt. J. Amer. Chem klh 7 (1974) 55. and

ChromaLoEraPblC

SIX..

beba\Tor

96

(1974)

wtLh

Lhose

T.

Yosbtdr.

3688.

of an aulheoctc

sample.