ABSORB: EVALUATION OF THE BIORESORBABLE EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING VASCULAR SCAFFOLD (BVS) IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DE NOVO NATIVE CORONARY ARTERY LESIONS: 1 YEAR ANGIOGRAPHIC, IVUS, IVUS-VH AND OCT RESULTS OF COHORT B

ABSORB: EVALUATION OF THE BIORESORBABLE EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING VASCULAR SCAFFOLD (BVS) IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DE NOVO NATIVE CORONARY ARTERY LESIONS: 1 YEAR ANGIOGRAPHIC, IVUS, IVUS-VH AND OCT RESULTS OF COHORT B

E1623 JACC April 5, 2011 Volume 57, Issue 14 i2 SUMMIT ABSORB: EVALUATION OF THE BIORESORBABLE EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING VASCULAR SCAFFOLD (BVS) IN THE TREA...

118KB Sizes 0 Downloads 45 Views

E1623 JACC April 5, 2011 Volume 57, Issue 14

i2 SUMMIT ABSORB: EVALUATION OF THE BIORESORBABLE EVEROLIMUS-ELUTING VASCULAR SCAFFOLD (BVS) IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DE NOVO NATIVE CORONARY ARTERY LESIONS: 1 YEAR ANGIOGRAPHIC, IVUS, IVUS-VH AND OCT RESULTS OF COHORT B i2 Oral Contributions Ernest N. Morial Convention Center, Room 353 Sunday, April 03, 2011, 8:25 a.m.-8:50 a.m.

Session Title: DES I Abstract Category: 16. PCI - DES (clinical/outcomes) Presentation Number: 2901-6 Authors: Patrick W. Serruys, on behalf of the ABSORB Cohort B investigators, Erasmus MC Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Background: The fully resorbable BVS (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara) was tested in the ABSORB Cohort A study in 30 patients with excellent 3 year clinical results major adverse cardiac event rate 3.6%. At 6 months, this first generation device (BVS 1.0) showed in-scaffold late loss of 0.44 ± 0.35 mm, 11.8% reduction in scaffold area and 24.3% decrease in minimal luminal area by IVUS attributed to late recoil. In a subset of patients with OCT, BVS 1.0 demonstrated 3% preserved box versus 30% open box, 50% dissolved bright box and 18% dissolved black box. By 2 years, OCT showed that the device had almost fully resorbed. To improve mechanical support of the device, the revision BVS 1.1 scaffold with modified strut design and polymer processing was developed and tested in 101 patients at 12 sites in the European and Asia Pacific regions version (Cohort B). Methods: Cohort B patients were divided into Group B1 (n=45) with imaging follow-up at 180 days and 2 years and Group B2 (n=56) with imaging follow-up at 1 and 3 years. Key imaging endpoints at 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years: in-scaffold and in-segment late loss (LL), in-scaffold % volume obstruction, quantitative and qualitative measurements by OCT (strut area and strut appearance). Results: Data to 6 months for the full 101 patients and up to 9 months for Group B1 (n=45) are currently available. Group B1 9 month results had a MACE rate of 4.4%. Imaging data at 6 months for Group B1 demonstrated an angiographic LL of 0.19 ± 0.18mm, a 2.0% reduction of the scaffold area and a 5.4% decrease in minimal luminal area by IVUS at variance with changes seen with BVS 1.0. The OCT data demonstrated an absence of qualitative alterations of the appearance of polymeric struts. They uniformly kept their preserved box appearance whereas open box, dissolved bright or black boxes were not observed unlike those observed in BVS 1.0. These observations suggest that the mechanical integrity of BVS 1.1 is longer lasting, thereby able to prevent any substantial loss in scaffold area in the first 6-months after implantation. Conclusions: The twelve month angiographic, IVUS, IVUS-VH and OCT results for Group B2 will be presented for an assessment of strut resorbtion at 1year.