Acute and 28-days repeated dose sub-acute toxicity study of gallic acid in albino mice

Acute and 28-days repeated dose sub-acute toxicity study of gallic acid in albino mice

Accepted Manuscript Acute and 28-days repeated dose sub-acute toxicity study of gallic acid in albino mice Bhavesh C. Variya, Anita K. Bakrania, Prem ...

7MB Sizes 2 Downloads 57 Views

Accepted Manuscript Acute and 28-days repeated dose sub-acute toxicity study of gallic acid in albino mice Bhavesh C. Variya, Anita K. Bakrania, Prem Madan, Snehal S. Patel PII:

S0273-2300(18)30302-7

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.11.010

Reference:

YRTPH 4259

To appear in:

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Received Date: 12 April 2018 Revised Date:

13 October 2018

Accepted Date: 15 November 2018

Please cite this article as: Variya, B.C., Bakrania, A.K., Madan, P., Patel, S.S., Acute and 28-days repeated dose sub-acute toxicity study of gallic acid in albino mice, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.11.010. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Acute and 28-days repeated dose sub-acute toxicity study of gallic acid in albino mice

1 2

1 Bhavesh C. Variya1, Anita K. Bakrania1, Prem Madan2, Snehal S. Patel *

3 4 5

1

6

Gujarat, 382 481, India.

7

2

RI PT

Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University, Ahmedabad,

MD-Pathologist, Sukoon pathology laboratory, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380052, India.

Running title: Oral toxicity study of gallic acid in mice

M AN U

9

SC

8

10

*Corresponding author:

12

Dr. Snehal S. Patel,

13 14

Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University, Ahmedabad-382481, Gujarat, India

15

Phone: 02717-241900-04

16

E-mail address: [email protected]

EP AC C

17

TE D

11

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract:

19

Gallic acid is a phenolic acid ubiquitously present in numerous medicinal plants and food

20

beverages. Gallic acid is also a potent anti-oxidant phytochemical possessing numerous

21

medicinal potentials against various ailments such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and

22

other life-threatening diseases including malignancy. Present study was aimed to evaluate

23

acute and sub-acute toxicity of gallic acid in albino mice. The primary aim of the study was

24

to investigate gallic acid prompted PPAR-α/γ activation associated adverse events. Acute

25

toxicity of gallic acid was determined in albino mice and 28-days sub-acute toxicity study

26

was carried out in male and female albino mice at three dose levels, 100, 300 and 900

27

mg/kg/day, p.o. LD50 of gallic acid was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg in mice.

28

Hematological investigation did not show any alteration in transaminases and other blood

29

homeostasis parameters. Gross necropsy showed non-significant alteration upon gallic acid

30

administration. Histopathological finding suggested no significant alteration in tissue

31

histology with slight fatty cells in bone marrow indicating non-significant bone marrow

32

suppression, also no obvious effect was observed on hematological parameters. High dose of

33

gallic acid (900 mg/kg/day) for 28 days did not produce any significant alteration in

34

morphological and behavioral parameters. Histopathological finding also supports safety of

35

gallic acid in mice.

36

Keywords: Gallic acid; Gross histopathology; Gross necropsy; OECD 407; Oral toxicity

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

37

RI PT

18

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction

39

Gallic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy benzoic acid, is abundantly present in various plants in form of

40

either free form or as an ester-conjugate. Polyphenols are believed to be the most important

41

group of secondary metabolites involved in plant defence system. Gallic acid is found in

42

different food sources such as; grapes, pomegranate, amla, nuts, berries and many more.

43

Apart from plant sources, gallic acid is also present in some beverages like wine and tea

44

(Badhani et al., 2015; Variya et al., 2016). Amount of gallic acid in plant tissues is greatly

45

affected by external stimuli like storage, exposure of radiation and microbial contamination,

46

and because of these external factors, phenolic content in grape juice as well as wine is

47

largely variable (Amerine and Ough, 1980).

48

Globally, as a means of advancement in various ailment therapies, researchers are focussing

49

upon bioactive compounds extracted from various plants and semi-synthetic derivatives of

50

natural compounds. Recently, flavonoids have received a great deal of attention due to their

51

various pharmacological properties such as antitumor, antiulcer, antiallergic, antioxidant and

52

antiviral actions (Ali Khan et al., 2017; Bakrania and Patel, 2015; Burkard et al., 2017; Qian

53

et al., 2017). Amongst them, gallic acid, which is a natural plant triphenol has been

54

extensively evaluated for its various pharmacological actions in a variety of in vivo and in

55

vitro models (Locatelli et al., 2013). Gallic acid has numerous benefits as a medicative drug

56

which include; anti-melanogenesis, anti-angiogenesis, anti-inflammatory, anti-mutation, anti-

57

oxidant, anti-hyperlipidemic, anti-hepatosteatosis, anti-fungal, anti-chloasma, anti-cancer,

58

cardio-protective, allergen deactivator, treatment of fatty liver and diabetes (Badhani et al.,

59

2015; Choubey et al., 2015). Additionally, currently available dual therapy i.e. PPARα/γ dual

60

agonists like -glitazars, have side effects related to either PPAR-α or PPAR-γ activation.

61

Even though they possess efficacious dual agonistic potential, many drug molecules failed in

62

therapeutic approach owing to the potential side effects viz. weight gain, fluid retention,

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

38

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT increased cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, elevated serum creatinine

64

level and bladder tumour (Wright et al., 2014). To overcome PPARα/γ-associated side

65

effects, there is an urgent need to identify a molecule having equilibration between PPAR-α

66

or PPAR-γ. In line with previous reports claiming PPARs-agonistic potential of gallic acid

67

(Bak et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2005), we also identified PPARα/γ-dual agonistic potential of

68

gallic acid in various experimental animals. Previous reports demonstrated in vivo as well as

69

in vitro safety profile of gallic acid in mice and rats. (Niho et al., 2001; Rajalakshmi et al.,

70

2001; Suganthy et al., 2018). Rajalakshmi et al. (2001) and Suganthy et al. (2018) have

71

conducted 28-days repeated dose toxicity of 7-methyl gallic acid and gallic acid at 1000

72

mg/kg dose level in mice and observed no adverse events on haematological parameters, as

73

well as no histological alteration in heart, liver, kidney, lung and brain. However, these

74

studies were focused on vital organs and haematological parameters hence there is still need

75

to assess detrimental effects of gallic acid on various other organs which are regulated

76

through PPARα/γ activation viz. adipose tissue, cardiovascular system, skeletal muscles and

77

bone-marrow. Due to the numerous pharmacological actions of gallic acid along with a vast

78

biodistribution for its activity on several organs with dual therapy for diabetes and

79

hyperlipidemia, we would aim at determining its PPARα/γ-associated toxicity before

80

advancing it as a dual management therapy for diabetes and hyperlipidaemia.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

81

RI PT

63

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2. Materials and methods

83

2.1. Materials

84

Gallic acid was procured from Sigma Aldrich, Co. St. Louis, MO, USA. Paraffin wax,

85

hematoxylin-eosin stain and glycerine used were of analytical grade. Various diagnostic kits

86

were procured from Lab-care Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd. India. Other materials used in the study

87

were of commercial grade and procured from local market. All other reagents were of

88

analytical grade, unless otherwise stated.

89

2.2. Experimental Animals

90

Three months old male and female swiss albino mice, weighing 25-30 g, were used and all

91

the protocols described in the current study were approved, vide protocol number

92

IP/PCOL/PHD/15-1/008 by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) of Institute of

93

Pharmacy, Nirma University, Ahmedabad. All the experimental procedures were in

94

accordance with the guidelines of Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of

95

Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), Government of India, New Delhi. The animals were

96

procured and housed in the animal house of the Institute under controlled conditions of

97

temperature 20°-25°C with 55±5% relative humidity and 12 h light and dark cycle. Acute and

98

sub-acute toxicity studies were performed according to the OECD-423 and OECD-407,

99

respectively; as described by regulation of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

82

100

Development (OECD).

101

2.3. Acute oral toxicity study

102

Female mice were randomly allocated into 2 groups i.e. vehicle control and gallic acid

103

control with 3 animals in each group. Gallic acid was dissolved in water and administered at

104

2000mg/kg body weight by oral gavage and animals were observed for 14 days for any sign 5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT of toxicity or mortality. Behavioural changes were observed consciously for first 4 hr and

106

body weight was recorded at the starting of protocol, on 7th day and at the end of protocol.

107

2.4. Sub-acute oral toxicity study

108

All the animals were randomized into 4 groups of 10 animals (5 male + 5 female) each

109

namely; normal control, gallic acid treated (100mg/kg), gallic acid treated (300mg/kg) and

110

gallic acid treated (900mg/kg). Treatment was initiated with 900mg/kg gallic acid, which was

111

the highest dose of gallic acid as per OECD 407 guidelines. Gallic acid was dissolved in

112

water and administered by oral gavage (p.o.) daily for 28 days. Simultaneously, same volume

113

of drinking water (approximately 100 µL) was administered orally to control animals.

114

Various evaluation parameters and changes in behaviour were recorded till the end of

115

protocol. Morphological changes in skin, fur, eyes, mucous membrane, lacrimation,

116

piloerection, pupil size, unusual respiration pattern, gait, posture and response to handling;

117

presence of tonic-clonic movements, stereotypies (excessive grooming, repetitive circling)

118

and bizarre behaviour (self-mutilation, walking backwards), before treatment and once every

119

week till 28 days, were recorded as describe earlier (Quesne, 1987). Continuous assessment

120

of body weight as well as food and water consumption were carried out once a week. During

121

the 4th week, sensory reactivity to stimuli (auditory, visual and proprioceptive stimuli), grip

122

strength and motor activity were assessed by former established methods (Bakrania et al.,

123

2017; Gad, 1982). The animals were subjected to fasting preceding the last dose on day 28

124

followed by blood and urine collection for various investigations.

125

2.4.1. Haematological, biochemical and urine investigation

126

At the end of protocol, animals were anaesthetized under light ether anaesthesia and blood

127

samples were collected from retro-orbital plexus into polypropylene eppendorf tubes

128

containing 20µL ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) for various haematological

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

105

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT examinations such as total leucocytes count, differential leucocytes count, platelet count, red

130

blood cell count, haemoglobin concentration, mean cell haemoglobin (MCH), mean cell

131

corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and

132

packed cell volume (PCV).

133

Plasma was separated from blood for biochemical investigation. The following biochemical

134

parameters were investigated: random plasma glucose, blood urea, serum creatinine, serum

135

total cholesterol, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamic pyruvic

136

transaminase (SGPT), sodium level, potassium level, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), total

137

protein, albumin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). All the analyses were performed on ABX

138

Micros 60® (Horiba ABX, Montpellier, France). Urine was collected overnight and analysed

139

for appearance, volume, osmolarity, pH (urinalysis strips), protein, glucose and presence of

140

any blood cells.

141

2.4.2. Gross necropsy and histopathological study

142

After blood sampling, animals were sacrificed and various organs were collected for gross

143

necropsy. Vital organs viz. heart, brain, kidneys, liver, lungs, reproductive organs such as

144

testes and ovaries, and other peripheral organs including adipose tissue, adrenal gland,

145

thyroid gland, spleen, thymus, stomach, intestine, pancreas, bones and peripheral nerves were

146

examined for the macroscopic morphology and organ weight was carried out.

147

Three animals from each group were randomly selected for histopathological studies. Heart,

148

brain, kidneys, liver, lungs, reproductive organs like testes or ovary and uterus or prostate,

149

white adipose tissue (WAT), trachea, salivary gland, thymus, adrenal gland, thyroid gland,

150

spleen, thymus, stomach, small and large intestines, pancreas, vagal nerve, peripheral nerve

151

i.e. sciatic nerve, femur bone and lymph nodes (1 located near to route of administration and

152

1 located distantly from the route of administration) were fixed in neutral buffered 10%

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

129

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT formalin. After fixation, samples were dehydrated with alcohol, embedded in paraffin,

154

sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. After formalin fixation, femur bone was

155

treated with 5% nitric acid for 24 hours and embedded in paraffin (Bakrania et al., 2017;

156

Variya et al., 2015). All the stained sections were examined for optical microscopy using

157

Olympus microscope. The pathologist performing the analysis was blinded to study protocol.

158

2.5. Statistical analysis

159

Statistical results are represented as mean±standard error of mean (S.E.M.). statistical

160

significant between the means of various groups were analyzed by unpaired two-tailed

161

Student's t-test using Prism (Graphpad, Version 5.00) statistical software. Data were

162

considered statistically significant when p<0.05.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

153

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3. Results

164

3.1. Acute toxicity study

165

Mice receiving 2000mg/kg gallic acid showed no alteration in behavioural parameters after

166

oral administration of gallic acid. Oral administration of gallic acid did not show any

167

significant alteration in body weight throughout the study protocol (supplementary table 1).

168

The mice, receiving 2000mg/kg, survived without any symptoms of toxicity indicating single

169

dose safety of gallic acid at 2000mg/kg in mice.

170

3.2. 28-days sub-acute toxicity study

171

3.2.1. Alteration in body weight and food-water intake

172

Weekly examined body weights of gallic acid administered mice were comparable to the

173

normal control in both sexes i.e. male and female mice. During the whole study protocol,

174

body weight fluctuation was recorded but non-significant change in body weight was

175

observed when compared with mice receiving either vehicle or other dose of gallic acid. This

176

indicates that gallic acid treatment has no major impact on body weights (Figure 1).

177

Likewise, food and water intake were found to be similar across all treated groups for the

178

entire study period in both, male and female as compared to the normal control mice (data not

179

shown); indicating that gallic acid has no major impact on the food and water consumption.

180

3.2.2. Morphological alteration

181

No changes in general appearance were observed pertaining to the eyes, skin, fur colour,

182

mucous membrane, lacrimation, piloerection, respiratory pattern and pupil size. Gallic acid

183

did not show alteration in posture, gait and response to handling. Additionally, there was

184

absence of any sign of tonic-clonic movements, stereotypies behaviours such as excessive

185

grooming and repetitive circling or any bizarre behaviour like backwards walking and self-

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

163

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT mutilation. The motor activities were also unaffected by gallic acid administration. Treatment

187

did not alter motor activity as well as grip strength significantly in both sexes, which was a

188

positive indication of absence of any variation in the skeletal system. No other apparent

189

morphological alterations were observed in gallic acid administered animals.

190

3.2.3. Haematological and biochemical examination

191

Gallic acid administered and control animals were subjected to the haematology analysis for

192

various biochemical parameters. As illustrated in Table 1, all the hematological and

193

biochemical parameters were found relative with the control mice. Biochemical estimations

194

for determination of various body organ functions such as; serum creatinine, blood urea,

195

serum cholesterol, random blood glucose, serum BUN, SGOT, SGPT and ALP indicated

196

absence of any deviation from the normal range inferring the normal body function regulation

197

was maintained in the gallic acid administered animals. Initially, mice receiving high dose of

198

gallic acid (900 mg/kg of body weight) and control mice were sacrificed and studies for

199

various toxicity. However, no significant toxicity was observed at highest dose of gallic acid

200

hence mice receiving lower dose of gallic acid were not sacrificed.

201

3.2.4. Urine analysis

202

Gallic acid administered animals when subjected to urinalysis parameters such as; change in

203

pH, osmolarity or physical appearance of urine, it was evident that no observable changes

204

were seen when compared to the normal control animals. The animals portrayed a pale-

205

yellow coloration of urine without pus, glucose, haematocrits or blood cells. Also, pH of

206

urine was maintained as slightly acidic indicative of the normal urine physiology and similar

207

results were observed in the gallic acid administered animals.

208

3.2.5. Macroscopic gross necropsy

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

186

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Macroscopic examination exhibited normal architecture without any sign of the

210

inflammation. Gallic acid administration did not alter organ weights relative to the terminal

211

body weight and were found to be comparable with the normal control indicating absence of

212

any inflammation, atrophy, hypertrophy or oedema; rendering it safe for administration in

213

various organs viz. kidneys, liver, adrenals, brain, spleen and heart (Figure 2). The gross

214

necropsy evidenced devoid of any lesions or abnormalities in the organ macroscopy in both

215

male and female mice treated with gallic acid.

216

3.2.6. Histopathological studies

217

In gallic acid administered mice brain sections, a symmetric pattern was observed in the left

218

and right hemispheres of male and female mice. As illustrated in Figure 3A, the cerebrum,

219

cerebellum and grey matter regions contained healthy astrocytic cells with prominent nuclei

220

and in close proximity to the neurons. Microscopical examination of the heart sections

221

demonstrated no abnormalities in the cardiomyocyte architecture in gallic acid administered

222

rats (Figure 3B). The normal architecture of the cardiac myocytes was maintained with the

223

absence of cardiac myopathy, myofiber degeneration, necrosis, vacuolation and mononuclear

224

cell infiltration which justify gallic acid treatment devoid of any toxicity in the heart of both

225

male and female mice.

226

Renal sections showed thin and delicate glomerular capillary loops with evidently normal

227

number of endothelial and mesangial cells indicating a normal glomerular filtration in the

228

gallic acid and normal control animals (Figure 3C). As shown in Figure 3D, liver section

229

histology showed a network of hepatocytes which were arranged in single-cell thick plates

230

separated by vascular sinusoids. In the gallic acid administered mice hepatic sections, no

231

incidences of hepato-diaphragmatic nodules, focal inflammation, focal tension, lipid

232

accumulation, periportal hepatocellular vacuolation or infiltration of inflammatory cells were

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

209

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT observed rendering gallic acid safe for the hepatic-functioning.. In WAT histological study,

234

no significant adipogenesis was observed in the gallic acid administered mice (Figure 3E).

235

Morphology of the adipocytes was maintained in a continuous polyhedral pattern with no

236

significant variations in the adipocyte morphology and adipocyte intensity in gallic acid

237

administered mice compared to normal control sections rendering gallic acid devoid of any

238

alterations in the WAT.

239

Gallic acid administered mice lung sections are devoid of infiltered lymphocytes, plasma

240

cells and histocytes in the sub-pleural regions indicating absence of inflammation (Figure

241

3F). As shown in Figure 3G, pancreas histology sections comprised of a uni-layered

242

pyramidal shaped cells forming the secretory acini. Also, the endocrine regions contained the

243

islets of Langerhans with endocrine cells scattered throughout the exocrine part of the tissue.

244

As displayed in Figure 3H, the architecture of the small intestine consisting of the intestinal

245

mucosa with villi was present along with Paneth cells which were observed beneath the

246

crypts in numerous concentrations implying secretion of the antibacterial substances such as

247

lysozymes in gallic acid administered animals. (Figure 3I).. HE-stained stomach sections

248

showed an intact mucosal surface consisting of simple columnar epithelium along with

249

numerous mucus secreting cells and acid secreting cells comprising closely packed glands

250

within the gastric mucosa (Figure 3J). Overall, the histopathological study of GI tract was in

251

defence with the aspect that there are no abnormalities viz. ulceration, oedema or

252

inflammation associated to the administration of gallic acid in the gastrointestinal tract.

253

Gallic acid administered mice spleen sections (Figure 3K) evidently showed normal

254

haematopoiesis which did not differ from the spleen sections of the normal control animals.

255

Accessory axillary and subiliac lymph nodes were examined for any toxicities due to gallic

256

acid administration. Immune cells were located in the lymphoid tissue with blood vessels

257

present in the connective tissue trabeculae extending from the hilus into the lymph

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

233

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT parenchyma with normal microscopy features implying normal lymph functioning hence

259

gallic acid exhibits no significant immunological-toxicity in the lymphatic system. As shown

260

in Figure 3L, no thymic lymphoid depletion was observed in the gallic acid administered

261

mice thymus sections.

262

As depicted in Figure 3M, the relative thickness of the cortical zones was found to be similar

263

in the gallic acid administered mice pancreas sections as well as control mice pancreas

264

sections implying absence of any abnormalities due to treatment. The femur bone was

265

examined for bone-marrow related toxicity due to gallic acid administration and its histology

266

showed a uniform layer of dense connective tissue (periosteum) which also contained

267

osteoprogenitor cells (Figure 3N). However, the overall examination of the bone sections

268

exhibited a normal range of bone marrow, but gallic acid administered mice bone sections

269

demonstrated diminutive fatty cells (Figure 3N) indicating displacement of these cells with

270

fatty cells but the sections were devoid of significant bone-marrow suppression or related

271

deformities.

272

Uniform microscopy of the sciatic nerve was evident with a healthy epineurium connective

273

tissue (Figure 3O)with absence of axon dilation and axonal defragmentation in the nerve

274

sections implying a healthy network in the gallic acid administered mice. The gross histology

275

of the thyroid comprised of rounded cysts and follicles separated by scant inter-follicular

276

connective tissue. Also, the follicles maintained a uniform cuboidal epithelium surrounded

277

with the lumen.

278

As shown in Figure 4A, testes histology showed a well organised germinal epithelium in both

279

gallic acid administered and normal control male mice. No observable difference in the

280

seminiferous epithelium of tubules was seen with a single layer of sertoli cells and

281

spermatogonia. The prostate gland architecture comprised of the fibromuscular stroma with

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

258

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT smooth muscle separated by strands of connective tissue rich in collagenous and elastic fibres

283

(Figure 4A). The corpora amylacea in the secretory alveoli were present as circular and

284

eosinophilic bodies without any sign of inflammatory secretions implying no toxicity due to

285

gallic acid treatment in the male reproductive organs.

286

The gross histology of the ovary comprised of a single layer cover of cuboidal epithelium in

287

continuation with the peritoneal mesothelium (Figure 4B). The ovarian follicles comprised of

288

an oocyte surrounded by various follicular cells viz. griffin follicle and primordial follicle.

289

There were no variations in the ovary histology pertaining to gallic acid administration. As

290

displayed in Figure 4B, the uterus sections comprised of a healthy and strong mucosal layer,

291

endometrium and a fibromuscular layer (myometrium). The endometrium exhibited simple

292

columnar epithelium and stromal cells indicating absence of any alterations in the uterine

293

functioning due to gallic acid administration.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

282

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4. Discussion

295

Gallic acid is a major phyto-tannin present in variety of plants. Gallic acid has shown

296

excellent results for hyperlipidaemia and diabetes therapy and it was therefore necessary to

297

perform the toxicity study of gallic acid in order to evaluate its pharmacological safety in

298

animals. Additionally, having PPAR-α/γ dual agonistic potential, it is more important to look

299

after PPAR-α/γ activation associated side effects viz. cardiac dysfunction, variation in blood

300

homeostasis, bone marrow depression and alteration in metabolism (Ahmed et al., 2007;

301

Home, 2011). Initially, the variation in food and water intake as well as body weight was

302

analysed and it was keenly observed that there was no variation pertaining to treatment with

303

gallic acid.

304

During the gross necropsy analysis of the various organs, no significant alteration in the

305

organ weights compared to the normal control organ weights was evident. Also, the various

306

organs did not portray any lesions, oedema or observable abnormalities; hence, gallic acid did

307

not expose any treatment related adverse effect on the various organs.

308

Alteration in haematopoietic system is one of the most crucial parameter for assessment of

309

drug toxicity (Yuan et al., 2014). In the present study, various biochemical parameters such

310

as; total blood counts, haemoglobin, differentiate leucocyte counts, PCV, MCV, MCH and

311

MCHC were estimated and these parameters lied within the respective normal ranges in the

312

gallic acid (900 mg/kg/day) administered mice of both sexes which was in comparison to the

313

normal control estimates. Liver and kidney are site of drug metabolism and elimination and

314

most sensitive organs to be affected by chemical toxicity. Any alteration in liver or kidney

315

functions result in the elevation of SGOT, SGPT, ALP, BUN, serum creatinine and

316

electrolytes in blood (Liju et al., 2013). We observed non-significant alteration in plasma

317

cholesterol, liver and kidney functions in gallic acid administered animals. This further states

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

294

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT that gallic acid maintains the normal biochemical homeostasis of the body and is devoid of

319

any toxicity to the various organs of the body. The urine analysis also portrayed the normal

320

appearance and microscopic characteristics along with absence of pus cells (pyuria),

321

concluding that gallic acid treatment did not deteriorate the kidney functioning.

322

Histopathological study also showed absence of any lesions, microvacuolar degeneration,

323

scalloping of the brush border or frank necrosis of tubular epithelium in renal histology

324

indicating no alteration in renal function which confirmed that gallic acid did not produce any

325

toxicity in the renal system altering its excretion physiology. The liver also devoid of any

326

infiltrated inflammatory mediators rendering gallic acid safe for administration at a dose of

327

900 mg/kg. Previous reposts have demonstrated that the hepatocytes which did not possess

328

any necrosis and portrayed uniform architectural arrangement do not have any alteration in

329

liver biomarkers markers i.e. SGOT, SGPT, ALT and albumin (Pari and Amudha, 2011;

330

Yayla et al., 2014; Zirak et al., 2014). These data are in accordance with previous study

331

demonstrating the safety of gallic acid in mice at a dose of 1000 mg/kg for 28-days

332

(Rajalakshmi et al., 2001). However, in contrast to this, Niho et al. demonstrated increased

333

liver weight in rats receiving 5% gallic acid in diet for 13 weeks but no alteration was

334

observed in rats receiving 1.7% gallic acid in diet for 13 weeks (Niho et al., 2001).

335

During the in-depth microscopic study of cardiac tissues through histopathological

336

examination, we did not observe any pathological findings as evidence of toxicity. There was

337

no evidence of myocyte hypertrophy indicating a physiological adaptive response to

338

normalised blood pressure and manifests absence of any changes in the myocardium. Gallic

339

acid administrated mice brain tissue histology has its intact architecture with medium and

340

large sized neurons with axons fully intact and systematically arranged devoid of any axonal

341

swelling or degeneration. Gallic acid did not demonstrate neuronal toxicity as evidence from

342

the brain histology.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

318

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT PPAR-γ agonists induce adipogenesis and WAT differentiation leads to increase in adiposity.

344

Simultaneously, PPAR-γ activation decreases osteogenesis and finally leads to bone marrow

345

suppression (Watt and Schlezinger, 2015). In the present study, there was non-significant

346

increase in WAT cellular size without increase in WAT or body weight. Histopathological

347

study demonstrated trivial fatty cells in the bone marrow but haematological parameters were

348

not affected and found to be comparable with control animals, indicating non-significant or

349

absence bone marrow suppression in the gallic acid administered mice.

350

Histology of the gastrointestinal system organs were studied and it was observed that the

351

stomach was precisely lined by the gastric mucosa and it did not possess any signs of

352

ulceration or infiltration of inflammatory markers which evidences that gallic acid

353

administration does not possess any hyperacidity which is an adverse effect observed with

354

several drug therapies (Cho and Ogle, 1977; Marshall and Warren, 1984). Further, the small

355

and large intestines also did not show any significant signs of ulceration or disruption in the

356

normal architecture confirming absence of any abnormalities in the gastrointestinal system

357

due to gallic acid administration. Similarly, the adrenals also did not expose to hypertrophy or

358

any inflammatory secretions which conclude the proper functioning of the adrenals in the

359

gallic acid administered animals.

360

Gallic acid administrated mice spleen comprised of normal lymphocyte regularity and no

361

evidence of lymphocyte hyperplasia indicating no alteration in spleenocytes. Further, the

362

thymus maintained its normal size and weight portraying that there was no splenomegaly

363

observed and therefore a normal synthesis of the corticosteroids was also maintained in the

364

body. No signs of lymphocyte apoptosis, lymphocyte necrosis and epithelial necrosis of

365

thymus was evident which concludes that gallic acid does not alter the immune system

366

mechanism in mice at a dose of 900 mg/kg.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

343

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Further, the male and female reproductive system organs were studied for any change which

368

could eventually impair the reproductivity of the animals due to gallic acid treatment. We

369

observed no observable difference in the testes architecture as compared to the normal

370

control male mice. There were evidences showing large quantities of spermatids in the gallic

371

acid administered mice which justify normal spermatogenesis and these results complied with

372

the normal control data. Also, the healthy occurrence of spermatids documents the orderly

373

progression of spermatogonia to spermatocytes (Abdullah and Bondagji, 2011; Aly et al.,

374

2012). Similarly, the prostate gland also exposed a normal histology. The female

375

reproductive organs- ovary and uterus, both maintained the normal ovulation and uterine

376

endometrium characteristics respectively. These indicated that gallic acid neither had any

377

adverse effect on the male nor female reproductive systems. Recently, Suganthy et al. also

378

did not observe in vitro genotoxicity of gallic acid at dose of 2000 µg/mL (Suganthy et al.,

379

2018).

SC

M AN U

TE D EP

381

AC C

380

RI PT

367

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5. Conclusion:

383

Acute and sub-acute toxicity study is essential element for translational research as well to

384

determine safety. The LD50 of gallic acid is found to be greater than 2000 (category 5,

385

LD50>2000 mg/kg). Gallic acid did not produce any significant toxicity related to

386

haematological and biochemical parameters. Despite of having adipogenic potential, gallic

387

acid did not show significant increase in body weight or bone marrow suppression in sub-

388

acute toxicity study in mice. The results of this study suggest that ingestion of gallic acid has

389

no adverse action or health-related acute or sub-acute toxicity.

SC

RI PT

382

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

390

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abbreviations

392

ALP- Alkaline phosphatase

393

BUN- Blood urea nitrogen

394

CPCSEA - Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on

395

Animals

396

EDTA - Ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid

397

HE - Hematoxylin and eosin

398

LD50 – Lethal dose

399

MCH - Mean cell haemoglobin

400

MCHC - Mean cell corpuscular haemoglobin concentration

401

MCV - Mean corpuscular volume

402

OECD - Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

403

p.o. - per oral

404

PCV - Packed cell volume

405

PPAR - Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

406

SGOT - Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase

407

SGPT -Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase

408

WAT - White adipose tissue

SC M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

409

RI PT

391

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Acknowledgment:

411

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by Department of

412

Science and Technology (DST, SERB, vide file no. SB/FT/LS-185/2012) for providing

413

research grant to carry out presented work. BV would like to offer his sincere gratitude to Dr.

414

Prem Madan, MD Pathologist for the assistance in the analysis of the histopathology samples.

RI PT

410

415

Author contributions

417

BV and AB designed, performed and interpreted studies data and wrote the manuscript. PM

418

analyzed and interpreted histopathological data. SP and PM analyzed and interpreted

419

experimental data, contributed to writing the manuscript and contributed to study supervision.

M AN U

SC

416

420

Conflicts of interest

422

The authors state that there are no conflicts of interest pertaining to this manuscript.

425

426

EP

424

AC C

423

TE D

421

427

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure captions

429

Figure 1: Food consumption of control and gallic acid administered male and female mice.

430

Values expressed as Mean ± SEM, n=5. Data are considered statistically significant when

431

p<0.05

432

Figure 2: Gallic acid did not show macroscopic alteration in various organs. Alteration in

433

organ weight with respect to body weight.

434

Values expressed as Mean ± SEM, n=5. Data are considered statistically significant when

435

p<0.05

436

Figure 3: Histopathological studies of brain, heart, kidney, liver, white adipose tissue, lung,

437

pancreas, small and large intestine, stomach, spleen, thymus, adrenal gland, bone and sciatic

438

nerve in control and gallic acid administered mice.

439

Figure 4: Histopathological studies of testes, prostate, ovary and uterus in control and gallic

440

acid administered mice.

SC

M AN U

441

AC C

EP

TE D

442 443

RI PT

428

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 444

Table captions

445

Table 1: Effect of gallic acid (900 mg/kg) on hematological and biochemical profile in mice

447

from 28 days sub-acute toxicity study

448

Gallic acid did not show significant alteration in haematological and biochemical

449

parameters in mice. Values expressed as Mean ± SEM, n=5. Data are considered statistically

450

significant when p<0.05

451

SC

RI PT

446

Supplementary Table 1: Change in body weight body weight in acute toxicity in mice

453

*results are rounded off to nearest whole number

454

Supplementary table 2: Grip strength and motor activity in sub-acute toxicity study of gallic

455

acid in mice

456

Higher dose of gallic acid did not alter grip strength and motor activity in mice. Values

457

expressed as Mean ± SEM, n=5. Data are considered statistically significant when p<0.05

M AN U

452

AC C

EP

TE D

458

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT References:

460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508

Abdullah, L., Bondagji, N., 2011. Histopathological patterns of testicular biopsy in male infertility: A retrospective study from a tertiary care center in the western part of Saudi Arabia. Urol Ann. 3, 19-23. Ahmed, I., et al., 2007. Dual PPAR α/γ Agonists: Promises and Pitfalls in Type 2 Diabetes. American Journal of Therapeutics. 14, 49-62. Ali Khan, M. S., et al., 2017. Flavonoids and Anti-Oxidant Activity Mediated Gastroprotective Action of Leathery Murdah, Terminalia Coriacea (Roxb.) Wight & Arn. Leaf Methanolic Extract in Rats. Arq Gastroenterol. 54, 183-191. Aly, H. A., et al., 2012. Mitochondrial dysfunction induced impairment of spermatogenesis in LPStreated rats: modulatory role of lycopene. Eur J Pharmacol. 677, 31-8. Amerine, M. A., Ough, C. S., Methods for analysis of musts and wines. 1980. Badhani, B., et al., 2015. Gallic acid: a versatile antioxidant with promising therapeutic and industrial applications. RSC Advances. 5, 27540-27557. Bak, E. J., et al., 2013. Gallic acid improves glucose tolerance and triglyceride concentration in dietinduced obesity mice. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 73, 607-14. Bakrania, A. K., Patel, S. S., 2015. Combination treatment for allergic conjunctivitis – Plant derived histidine decarboxylase inhibitor and H1 antihistaminic drug. Experimental Eye Research. 137, 32-38. Bakrania, A. K., et al., 2017. Repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity study of DEAE-Dextran in mice: An advancement in safety chemotherapeutics. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 88, 262-272. Burkard, M., et al., 2017. Dietary flavonoids and modulation of natural killer cells: implications in malignant and viral diseases. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 46, 1-12. Cho, C. H., Ogle, C. W., 1977. The effects of zinc sulphate on vagal-induced mast cell changes and ulcers in the rat stomach. Eur J Pharmacol. 43, 315-22. Choubey, S., et al., 2015. Medicinal importance of gallic acid and its ester derivatives: a patent review. Pharm Pat Anal. 4, 305-15. Gad, S. C., 1982. A neuromuscular screen for use in industrial toxicology. J Toxicol Environ Health. 9, 691-704. Home, P., 2011. Safety of PPAR agonists. Diabetes Care. 34 Suppl 2, S215-9. Huang, T. H., et al., 2005. Anti-diabetic action of Punica granatum flower extract: activation of PPARgamma and identification of an active component. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 207, 160-9. Liju, V. B., et al., 2013. Acute and subchronic toxicity as well as mutagenic evaluation of essential oil from turmeric (Curcuma longa L). Food Chem Toxicol. 53, 52-61. Locatelli, C., et al., 2013. Alkyl esters of gallic acid as anticancer agents: a review. Eur J Med Chem. 60, 233-9. Marshall, B. J., Warren, J. R., 1984. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet. 1, 1311-5. Niho, N., et al., 2001. Subchronic toxicity study of gallic acid by oral administration in F344 rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 39, 1063-1070. Pari, L., Amudha, K., 2011. Hepatoprotective role of naringin on nickel-induced toxicity in male Wistar rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 650, 364-70. Qian, L., et al., 2017. Optimized microwave-assistant extraction combined ultrasonic pretreatment of flavonoids from Periploca forrestii Schltr. and evaluation of its anti-allergic activity. ELECTROPHORESIS. 38, 1113-1121. Quesne, P. M. L., 1987. Principles and Methods for the Assessment of Neurotoxicity Associated with Exposure to Chemicals. (Environmental Health Criteria No 60.). Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 50, 510-510. Rajalakshmi, K., et al., 2001. Assessment of the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of gallic acid in mice. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 39, 919-922.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

459

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

SC

RI PT

Suganthy, N., et al., 2018. Safety assessment of methanolic extract of Terminalia chebula fruit, Terminalia arjuna bark and its bioactive constituent 7-methyl gallic acid: In vitro and in vivo studies. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 92, 347-357. Variya, B. C., et al., 2016. Emblica officinalis (Amla): A review for its phytochemistry, ethnomedicinal uses and medicinal potentials with respect to molecular mechanisms. Pharmacol Res. 111, 180-200. Variya, B. C., et al., 2015. Comparative evaluation of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors in experimentally-induced myocardial necrosis: Biochemical, morphological and histological studies. Eur J Pharmacol. 764, 283-91. Watt, J., Schlezinger, J. J., 2015. Structurally-diverse, PPARgamma-activating environmental toxicants induce adipogenesis and suppress osteogenesis in bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Toxicology. 331, 66-77. Wright, M. B., et al., 2014. Minireview: Challenges and opportunities in development of PPAR agonists. Mol Endocrinol. 28, 1756-68. Yayla, M., et al., 2014. Protective effect of Et-1 receptor antagonist bosentan on paracetamol induced acute liver toxicity in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 726, 87-95. Yuan, G., et al., 2014. Toxicological assessment of combined lead and cadmium: acute and subchronic toxicity study in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 65, 260-8. Zirak, M. R., et al., 2014. Tropisetron attenuates cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 738, 222-9.

M AN U

509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528

AC C

EP

TE D

529

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1: Effect of gallic acid (900 mg/kg) on hematological and biochemical profile in mice from 28 days sub-acute toxicity study Female animals

900 mg/kg gallic acid

Control

900 mg/kg gallic acid

Hemoglobin (gm/dl)

14.3 ± 1.16

14.1 ± 2.15

14.2 ± 2.08

13.1 ± 1.34

Total WBC count (per cu.mm)

3200 ± 86.11

2700 ± 311

1200 ± 163

1800 ± 248

Total platelet count (Per cu.mm)

803000 ± 71360

790000 ± 33897

570000 ± 42060

651000 ± 61280

Neutrophils (%)

34 ± 3.20

41 ± 5.34

49 ± 7.22

41 ± 8.10

Lymphocytes (%)

63 ± 5.94

52 ± 5.13

43 ± 6.37

49 ± 6.02

Eosinophils (%)

2 ± 0.07

3 ± 1.00

5 ± 1.04

3 ± 0.57

Monocytes (%)

1 ± 0.00

4 ± 0.67

3 ± 0.39

4 ± 1.67

Total RBC count (mil./cumm)

9.71 ± 1.044

9.57 ± 2.38

9.27 ± 2.79

8.87 ± 3.34

PCV (%)

42.9 ± 4.22

43.3 ± 3.36

40.2 ± 4.37

40.8 ± 5.07

MCV (%)

44.2 ± 5.00

45.1 ± 5.71

43.4 ± 3.99

46.2 ± 6.32

MCH (%)

14.7 ± 2.84

13.8 ± 2.62

15.3 ± 6.18

14.8 ± 4.70

MCHC (%)

33.3 ± 2.97

32.6 ± 6.04

35.3 ± 6.98

32.1 ± 3.34

Random blood glucose (mg/dl)

126.2 ± 35.2

82 ± 11.04

146 ± 15.39

124 ± 8.51

0.47 ± 0.05

0.37 ± 0.07

0.28 ± 0.002

0.35 ± 0.005

38.9 ± 2.33

36.5 ± 5.19

36.4 ± 2.08

47.8 ± 7.83

70 ± 0.99

74 ± 6.34

65 ± 3.5

57 ± 8.32

SGPT (U/L)

32.71 ± 3.16

34.6 ± 6.34

32.3 ± 1.87

39.8 ± 6.40

SGOT (U/L)

77.4 ± 5.04

67.4 ± 7.71

81.8 ± 4.75

79.3 ± 7.67

Blood urea (mg/dl) Serum cholesterol (mg/dl)

TE D

EP

AC C

Serum creatinine (mg/dl)

SC

Control

M AN U

RI PT

Male animals Parameter

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

18.1 ± 3.66

17 ± 3.01

17 ± 2.30

21.3 ± 3.18

Serum sodium (mmol/L)

136 ± 22.08

142 ± 13.15

133 ± 9.46

137 ± 9.91

Serum potassium (mmol/L)

3.8 ± 0.64

4 ± 0.34

4 ± 0.36

4.1 ± 0.83

Serum protein (total) (gm/dl)

5.73 ± 1.97

5.98 ± 0.73

5.53 ± 1.00

5.9 ± 1.25

Serum albumin (gm/dl)

2.61 ± 0.05

2.63 ± 0.62

2.58 ± 0.64

2.7 ± 0.81

Serum alkaline phosphatase (U/L)

69.7 ± 1.55

68 ± 8.41

165 ± 6.58

147.9 ± 21.18

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Serum BUN (mg/dl)

Gallic acid did not show significant alteration in haematological and biochemical parameters in mice. Values expressed as Mean ± SEM, n=5. Data are considered statistically significant when p<0.05 Note: Initially, mice receiving high dose of gallic acid (900 mg/kg of body weight) and control mice were sacrificed and studies for various

AC C

EP

TE D

toxicity. We did not observe any significant toxicity hence we did not sacrifice the mice receiving lower dose of gallic acid.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights… •

Acute toxicity i.e. LD50 of gallic acid, known for various biological potentials, was more than 2000 mg/kg in mice.

use of gallic acid. •

Hematological, biochemical and morphological parameters did not show significant alteration in gallic acid treated mice.



28 days repeated dose sub-acute toxicity showed NOAEL (No observed adverse effect level) at a dose of 900 mg/kg in mice.

EP

TE D

potential therapeutic agent.

M AN U

Due to multiple therapeutic uses and minimal adverse events, gallic acid could be

AC C



RI PT

No alteration in transaminase and BUN level indicates hepato- and nephro-safety with

SC