- Email: [email protected]
All-optical wavelength converter based on fiber cross-phase modulation and fiber Bragg grating
Optics Communications 283 (2010) 1744–1749
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Optics Communications journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/optcom
All-optical wavelength converter based on fiber cross-phase modulation and fiber Bragg grating Pavel Honzatko Institute of Photonics and Electronics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Chaberska 57, 182 51 Prague 8, Czech Republic
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 4 November 2009 Received in revised form 19 December 2009 Accepted 26 December 2009
Keywords: Wavelength conversion Fiber cross-phase modulation Fiber Bragg grating
a b s t r a c t I present new method of phase modulation to amplitude modulation conversion (PM/AM conversion) that utilizes integrating capabilities of fiber Bragg grating (FBG). I found that the wavelength converter based on fiber cross-phase modulation (XPM) and new method of PM/AM conversion have an order of magnitude higher conversion efficiency then the wavelength converter based on sideband filtration method and up to 6 dB higher conversion efficiency then the converter based on the nonlinear optical loop mirror. Numerical analysis and experimental results are provided for bit rates up to 40 Gb/s. Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction All-optical wavelength converter is one of principal building blocks in high-capacity wavelength division multiplexed networks allowing processing in optical layer. Long-haul transmission at high bit rates above 40 Gb/s requires utilization of return-to-zero (RZ) or differential phase-shift-keying (DPSK) modulation format. Wavelength conversion of RZ signal based on cross-phase modulation (XPM) in an optical fiber followed by an optical filter has been reported at 40 Gb/s [1] and later at 160 Gb/s [2]. XPM modulation acquired in Raman amplifier allows to achieve a higher modulation index while distortions due to self-phase modulation (SPM) are kept low [3,4]. Other wavelength converters based on Kerr nonlinearity of optical fiber include nonlinear optical loop mirror [5,6], nonlinear polarization rotation [7], and four wave mixing (FWM) [8]. Stability and compactness issues imposed by using long nonlinear fibers were relieved by using short lengths of special Bismuthbased highly nonlinear fibers. Wavelength conversion of RZ pulses was demonstrated with these fibers in a converter based on nonlinear polarization rotation [9], and FWM [10]. Record nonlinearity tapered chalcogenide glass fiber was used to further reduce the fiber length in wavelength converter based on XPM [11]. Wavelength converter based on mixed cross-gain (XGM) and cross-phase modulation in a semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) with subsequent filtering and inversion in a differential interferometer was demonstrated up to 320 GHz [12]. Other schemes based on nonlinearities of SOA exploit nonlinear polariza-
E-mail address: [email protected] 0030-4018/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2009.12.075
tion rotation [13], FWM [14], or mixed cross-phase/polarization/ gain-modulation in a differential scheme of Sagnac interferometer [15], Mach–Zehnder interferometer [16,17], and differential interferometer [18]. Recently I proposed a new scheme of PM/AM conversion suitable for use in wavelength converters based on fiber XPM for RZ modulation format [19]. The scheme have an order of magnitude higher conversion efficiency then the sideband filtration method and up to 6 dB higher conversion efficiency then the nonlinear optical loop mirror. Here I present numerical analysis of the performance together with the experimental results of conversion at repetition rates up to 40 Gb/s obtained in the wavelength converter with short highly nonlinear fiber. The principle of PM/AM conversion in FBG and numerical analysis are presented in Section 2. Experimental results are presented in Section 3.
2. Theory The scheme of the wavelength converter is shown in Fig. 1. The data pulses and CW are coupled into the highly nonlinear fiber (HNLF) using the wavelength selective directional coupler (CWDM). The CW is phase modulated through the cross-phase modulation (XPM) in the HNLF. The data pulses are blocked by another wavelength selective coupler and the phase modulation acquired by the CW is converted into the amplitude modulation in the fiber Bragg grating (FBG). When the monochromatic signal is tuned to the vicinity of the Bragg resonance and propagates along the FBG, the backward wave builds up at the expense of the forward wave. The backward wave effectively averages perturbations of the field because it is formed
P. Honzatko / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 1744–1749
1745
j is the coupling coefficient, rðxÞ ¼ n01 ðxÞx=c p=K is the local detuning, K is the FBG period and n01 ðxÞ is the effective refractive index of the fundamental mode. The FBG is supposed to be written in conventional SMF28 fiber and the effective refractive index of the fundamental mode used in the numerical simulations is taken from [20] Fig. 1. A wavelength converter based on fiber Bragg grating. CWL – CW laser, HNLF – highly nonlinear fiber, FBG – fiber Bragg grating.
by coherent superposition of many small reflections at different points along the grating. When the input wave is phase modulated and its phase deviates by p, instead of being depleted during the propagation along the grating it is amplified at the expense of the energy stored in the backward wave. In this way PM is converted to AM. Utilising the coupled mode equations, it can be shown that for sufficiently strong grating the amplitude of converted pulse approaches twice the value of the input CW asymptotically. In this way, the converted pulse can have almost four times higher peak power than the power of CW. The perturbation of the backward wave leads to appearance of small and wide trailing pulse. Let the input data pulses have a Gaussian shape
ED ðtÞ ¼ ED0 exp½2 lnð2Þt2 =T 2D expðixD tÞ;
ð1Þ
where ED0 is the data pulse amplitude, T D is the pulse full width at half maximum, and xD is the angular frequency of data pulses. This pulse is sent into a HNLF together with a continuous wave at different frequency. Due to the cross-phase modulation, the data pulse shape will be imprinted in the phase of CW field at the output of HNLF,
EX ðtÞ ¼ expfim exp½4 lnð2Þt 2 =T 2D ixX tg;
Fig. 2. Pulse converted by the FBG when the CW is tuned to the resonance (dash) and when it has an offset of 6 GHz (solid). An inset shows detail for small power levels.
ð2Þ
where xX is the angular frequency of CW, m ¼ 2c2 Leff PD is the modulation index, c2 is the nonlinear coefficient of the fiber, P D ¼ jED0 j2 is the data pulse peak power,
Leff ¼
1 expðaLÞ
a
;
ð3Þ
is the effective length of the fiber, and a is the fiber loss coefficient. Here we omitted plethora of effects that occur in nonlinear dispersive fibers like dispersion and self-phase modulation (SPM) of data pulses, walk-off, parametric processes, PM/AM conversion as a result of XPM and dispersion, modulation instability (MI), and Stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS). This is justified as long as we work in the regime where the dispersive length of pulses is long compared to the length of the fiber, their peak power is not excessively high, the CW power is sufficiently low so that parametric processes, MI and SBS are unimportant and CW is sufficiently detuned from the input pulses. These conditions are met in our experiment. To facilitate comparison with the experiment we will keep the data pulse width T D ¼ 2:5 ps and XPM modulation index m ¼ p throughout the simulations. The converted signal is found from the spectrum of the XPM signal and the complex transmission function HðxÞ of the FBG as
EC ðtÞ ¼ F1 fHðxÞF½EX ðtÞg;
Fig. 3. Conversion of a long sequence of consecutive pulses. A frequency offset of 6 GHz was used.
ð4Þ
1
where F½ and F ½ denotes Fourier transform and its inverse. The complex transmission function of the uniform FBG can be written as [20]
HðxÞ ¼
cðxÞ expðipL=KÞ ; cðxÞ coshðcðxÞLÞ irðxÞ sinhðcðxÞLÞ
where L is the FBG length,
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi cðxÞ ¼ jjj2 rðxÞ2 ;
ð5Þ Fig. 4. An experimental set-up. DS-data source, MLL-modelocked laser, PA-preamplifiers, BA-booster amplifier, MOD-modulator, OMUX-optical time domain multiplexer, F-filters, PC-polarization controllers, CWL-CW laser, DCA-data communication analyzer, RX-receiver, CRU-clock recovery unit.
1746
P. Honzatko / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 1744–1749
n01 ¼ 1:46409528 0:00829634k 0:00184767k2 ;
ð6Þ
where the wavelength k should be substituted in lm. The grating period K ¼ 534:6 nm provides Bragg resonance at 1547 nm. The coupling strength is related to the resonance transmission T 0 expressed in dB as
jL ¼ arccoshð10T 0 =20 Þ:
ð7Þ
The uniform grating used in the experiment had a transmission dip depth of 24.5 dBm and bandwidth of 0.13 nm that correspond to the coupling strength of jL ¼ 3:5, and number of grating periods 30,800, respectively.
First we study the wavelength conversion of a solitary Gaussian pulse. Using the presented model we obtain the converted pulse that is presented in Fig. 2. The pulse has a peak power P pk ¼ 3:2PX , where P X is the power of continuous wave. The pulse propagation time through the FBG is 80.4 ps. A small magnitude trailing pulse appears as a result of perturbation of the backward wave in the grating. As can be seen in Fig. 2, the conversion efficiency can be further improved and the trailing peak suppressed when the CW laser has a negative frequency offset with respect to the Bragg resonance. This offset leads to lower background suppression, however. There is a trade-off between the trailing pulse magnitude and the background suppression.
Fig. 5. Eye diagrams of (a) input and (b) converted pulses at 10 Gb/s.
P. Honzatko / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 1744–1749
The resonant mode perturbation have to decay before the arrival of the next pulse. In opposite case, the perturbation would accumulate in the grating preventing proper function of the converter. I therefore investigated the response of the converter to the long sequence of consecutive pulses. I found that our grating should work almost perfectly for repetition rates up to 40 Gb/s. The result of conversion of 16 consecutive ‘‘ones” is shown in Fig. 3. For this repetition rate the field of the resonant mode almost relaxes to its steady state before the arrival of the next pulse and only a small transient effect at the beginning of the long sequence can be observed.
1747
3. Experiment The experimental set-up is shown in Fig. 4. As a source of RZ pulses I used the mode-locked laser ðu2 tÞ generating a periodic train of pulses with a repetition rate of 10 GHz, a wavelength of 1563 nm, and a pulse-width of 1.5 ps. These pulses were preamplified, filtered, and modulated with Mach–Zehnder intensity modulator MOD driven from the pseudorandom bit sequence generator PRBS (up to 231 1, Centellax), that was synchronized to the mode-locked laser signal via receiver RX (Bookham) and clock recovery unit CRU (Centellax). Pulses from the data
Fig. 6. Eye diagrams of (a) input and (b) converted pulses at 20 Gb/s.
1748
P. Honzatko / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 1744–1749
source were eventually multiplexed to 20 Gb/s or 40 Gb/s in optical multiplexer (OMUX, u2t), and then amplified by booster amplifier BA and coupled into the highly nonlinear fiber HNLF (OFS) using the reflecting port of a coarse wavelength division multiplexer (CWDM) centered at 1551 nm (Opneti). The HNLF with a length L ¼ 50 m, a zero dispersion wavelength of 1506 nm and a 1 was used in the experinonlinear coefficient c ¼ 11 W1 km ment. At the output of the NZ-DSF, the RZ pulses and CW were separated by another CWDM. The average power of amplified and filtered pulses was 19.1 dBm and their duration at the input of the HNLF was 2.5 ps FWHM. The energy of pulses was estimated to be 8.1 pJ at 10 Gb/s and their peak power to be 2.9 W that cor-
responds approximately to a nonlinear phase shift of p. Light of a CW laser was amplified to 12 dBm and coupled into the HNLF using the pass port of the CWDM. Polarization controllers (PC3–PC4) were used to obtain the best magnitude of converted pulses. The converted RZ pulses were detected by fast receiver for 40 Gb/s (u2t) and analyzed by the data communication analyzer (DCA8100, Agilent). The eye diagram of input pulses and of converted pulses for 10 Gb/s data stream can be seen in Fig. 5. It can be seen that an excellent quality of converted signal can be attained. Some jitter that can be observed on the detected pulses is caused by group delay variations and probably would be removed if the synchronization signal for DCA was derived from
Fig. 7. Eye diagrams of (a) input and (b) converted pulses at 40 Gb/s.
P. Honzatko / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 1744–1749
the output signal. The pulse duration of the converted pulses was estimated to be 4 ps based on the autocorrelation measurement and the data from home-made optical sampling oscilloscope. I also performed an experiment with format conversion at 20 Gb/s. The signal from our RZ-pulses source was multiplexed to 20 Gb/s in an optical time domain multiplexer (OMUX) preserving the PRBS 27 1. The average power of RZ pulses was kept at 19.1 dBm, so the pulse energy was reduced to 4.1 pJ and the peak nonlinear phase shift reduced to p=2. Nevertheless, clear eye diagram was obtained at this repetition rate demonstrating scalability of the device toward the higher bit-rates (Fig. 6). When the input RZ pulses were further multiplexed to 40 Gb/s, the eye diagram of converted pulses was almost closed (Fig. 7). It was a combined result of the jitter imposed by the synchronization scheme used in the experiment, insufficient peak power of input RZ pulses, that was further reduced by a factor of two, and possibly by the transient effects in the FBG itself. 4. Conclusion I presented new method of wavelength conversion. The converter is based on fiber XPM with subsequent conversion of PM into AM in the fiber Bragg grating. The interference between the Bragg grating resonant mode and forward wave is exploited for conversion of PM into AM. Because an energy accumulated in the resonant mode is utilized, the converter has up to 6 dB better conversion efficiency then a converter based on nonlinear optical loop mirror and an order of magnitude better conversion efficiency then the wavelength converter based on sideband filtration. Numerical analysis and experimental results are provided for bit rates up to 40 Gb/s. Acknowledgement This project was supported by the program ‘‘Information society” of the Czech Academy of Sciences (1ET300670502). References [1] B.-E. Olsson, P. Ohlen, L. Rau, D.J. Blumenthal, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 12 (7) (2000) 846.
1749
[2] L. Rau, W. Wang, H. Poulsen, D. Blumenthal, 160 Gb/s OTDM wavelength conversion using XPM in dispersion shifted fiber, in: Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Optical Society of America, 2004, p. FA7. [3] W. Wang, H.N. Poulsen, L. Rau, D.J. Blumenthal, H.-F. Chou, J.E. Bowers, G.-N. Lars, 80-Gb/s regenerative wavelength conversion using a hybrid Raman/EDFA gain-enhanced XPM converter with highly-nonlinear-fiber, in: Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Optical Society of America, 2003, p. TuH2. [4] W. Wang, H.N. Poulsen, L. Rau, H.-F. Chou, J.E. Bowers, D.J. Blumenthal, J. Lightw. Technol. 23 (3) (2005) 1105. [5] J. Yu, X. Zheng, C. Peucheret, A.T. Clausen, H.N. Poulsen, P. Jeppesen, J. Lightw. Technol. 18 (7) (2000) 1001. [6] J. Yu, P. Jeppesen, S.N. Knudsen, Electronics Lett. 37 (9) (2001) 577. [7] C. Vinegoni, M. Wegmuller, B. Huttner, N. Gisin, Opt. Commun. 182 (4) (2000) 335. [8] K. Igarashi, H. Tobioka, S. Takasaka, R. Miyabe, J. Hiroishi, T. Yagi, O. Aso, S. Namiki, Wavelength conversion characteristics of highly efficient fiberoptic four-wave mixer for 160 GHz picosecond pulse train, in: Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Optical Society of America, 2004, p. TuC6. [9] J.H. Lee, K. Kikuchi, T. Nagashima, T. Hasegawa, S. Ohara, N. Sugimoto, Opt. Express 13 (8) (2005) 3144. [10] M. P. Fok, C. Shu, D. J. Blumenthal, 40-Gb/s polarization multiplexed RZ-ASKDPSK signal wavelength conversion using a 32-cm bismuth-oxide highly nonlinear fiber, in: CLEO/Europe and IQEC 2007 Conference Digest, Optical Society of America, 2007, pp. CI4–2. [11] L. Fu, M. Pelusi, E. Mägi, V. Ta’Eed, B. Eggleton, Electronics Lett. 44 (1) (2008) 44. [12] Y. Liu, E. Tangdiongga, Z. Li, H. de Waardt, A.M. Koonen, G.D. Khoe, X. Shu, I. Bennion, H.J.S. Dorren, J. Lightw. Technol. 25 (1) (2007) 103. [13] Y. Liu, M.T. Hill, E. Tangdiongga, H. De Waardt, N. Calabretta, G.D. Khoe, H.J.S. Dorren, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 15 (1) (2003) 90. [14] M.W.K. Mak, H.K. Tsang, Electronics Lett. 36 (2) (2000) 152. [15] L. Xu, I. Glesk, V. Baby, P.R. Prucnal, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 16 (2) (2004) 539. [16] S. Nakamura, Y. Ueno, K. Tajima, Error-free all-optical data pulse regeneration at 84 Gbps and wavelength conversion at 168 Gbps and wavelength conversion at 168 Gbps with symmetric mach-zehnder all-optical switches, in: Optical Amplifiers and Their Applications, Optical Society of America, 2000, p. OWB7. [17] S. Nakamura, T. Tamanuki, Y. Ueno, K. Tajima, Ultrafast optical demultiplexing, regeneration, and wavelength-conversion with symmetric-mach-zehnder alloptical switches, in: Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Optical Society of America, 2003, p. WG1. [18] W. Zhao, M.L. Masanovic, D.J. Blumenthal, G. Fish, J. Opt. Netw. 6 (8) (2007) 1014. [19] P. Honzatko, Wavelength converters based on fiber XPM and fiber Bragg gratings, in: Proceeding of 2009 11th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, 2009, p. We.C2.4. [20] M. Kulishov, J. Azaña, Opt. Express 15 (10) (2007) 6152.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Optics Communications journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/optcom
All-optical wavelength converter based on fiber cross-phase modulation and fiber Bragg grating Pavel Honzatko Institute of Photonics and Electronics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Chaberska 57, 182 51 Prague 8, Czech Republic
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 4 November 2009 Received in revised form 19 December 2009 Accepted 26 December 2009
Keywords: Wavelength conversion Fiber cross-phase modulation Fiber Bragg grating
a b s t r a c t I present new method of phase modulation to amplitude modulation conversion (PM/AM conversion) that utilizes integrating capabilities of fiber Bragg grating (FBG). I found that the wavelength converter based on fiber cross-phase modulation (XPM) and new method of PM/AM conversion have an order of magnitude higher conversion efficiency then the wavelength converter based on sideband filtration method and up to 6 dB higher conversion efficiency then the converter based on the nonlinear optical loop mirror. Numerical analysis and experimental results are provided for bit rates up to 40 Gb/s. Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction All-optical wavelength converter is one of principal building blocks in high-capacity wavelength division multiplexed networks allowing processing in optical layer. Long-haul transmission at high bit rates above 40 Gb/s requires utilization of return-to-zero (RZ) or differential phase-shift-keying (DPSK) modulation format. Wavelength conversion of RZ signal based on cross-phase modulation (XPM) in an optical fiber followed by an optical filter has been reported at 40 Gb/s [1] and later at 160 Gb/s [2]. XPM modulation acquired in Raman amplifier allows to achieve a higher modulation index while distortions due to self-phase modulation (SPM) are kept low [3,4]. Other wavelength converters based on Kerr nonlinearity of optical fiber include nonlinear optical loop mirror [5,6], nonlinear polarization rotation [7], and four wave mixing (FWM) [8]. Stability and compactness issues imposed by using long nonlinear fibers were relieved by using short lengths of special Bismuthbased highly nonlinear fibers. Wavelength conversion of RZ pulses was demonstrated with these fibers in a converter based on nonlinear polarization rotation [9], and FWM [10]. Record nonlinearity tapered chalcogenide glass fiber was used to further reduce the fiber length in wavelength converter based on XPM [11]. Wavelength converter based on mixed cross-gain (XGM) and cross-phase modulation in a semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) with subsequent filtering and inversion in a differential interferometer was demonstrated up to 320 GHz [12]. Other schemes based on nonlinearities of SOA exploit nonlinear polariza-
E-mail address: [email protected] 0030-4018/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2009.12.075
tion rotation [13], FWM [14], or mixed cross-phase/polarization/ gain-modulation in a differential scheme of Sagnac interferometer [15], Mach–Zehnder interferometer [16,17], and differential interferometer [18]. Recently I proposed a new scheme of PM/AM conversion suitable for use in wavelength converters based on fiber XPM for RZ modulation format [19]. The scheme have an order of magnitude higher conversion efficiency then the sideband filtration method and up to 6 dB higher conversion efficiency then the nonlinear optical loop mirror. Here I present numerical analysis of the performance together with the experimental results of conversion at repetition rates up to 40 Gb/s obtained in the wavelength converter with short highly nonlinear fiber. The principle of PM/AM conversion in FBG and numerical analysis are presented in Section 2. Experimental results are presented in Section 3.
2. Theory The scheme of the wavelength converter is shown in Fig. 1. The data pulses and CW are coupled into the highly nonlinear fiber (HNLF) using the wavelength selective directional coupler (CWDM). The CW is phase modulated through the cross-phase modulation (XPM) in the HNLF. The data pulses are blocked by another wavelength selective coupler and the phase modulation acquired by the CW is converted into the amplitude modulation in the fiber Bragg grating (FBG). When the monochromatic signal is tuned to the vicinity of the Bragg resonance and propagates along the FBG, the backward wave builds up at the expense of the forward wave. The backward wave effectively averages perturbations of the field because it is formed
P. Honzatko / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 1744–1749
1745
j is the coupling coefficient, rðxÞ ¼ n01 ðxÞx=c p=K is the local detuning, K is the FBG period and n01 ðxÞ is the effective refractive index of the fundamental mode. The FBG is supposed to be written in conventional SMF28 fiber and the effective refractive index of the fundamental mode used in the numerical simulations is taken from [20] Fig. 1. A wavelength converter based on fiber Bragg grating. CWL – CW laser, HNLF – highly nonlinear fiber, FBG – fiber Bragg grating.
by coherent superposition of many small reflections at different points along the grating. When the input wave is phase modulated and its phase deviates by p, instead of being depleted during the propagation along the grating it is amplified at the expense of the energy stored in the backward wave. In this way PM is converted to AM. Utilising the coupled mode equations, it can be shown that for sufficiently strong grating the amplitude of converted pulse approaches twice the value of the input CW asymptotically. In this way, the converted pulse can have almost four times higher peak power than the power of CW. The perturbation of the backward wave leads to appearance of small and wide trailing pulse. Let the input data pulses have a Gaussian shape
ED ðtÞ ¼ ED0 exp½2 lnð2Þt2 =T 2D expðixD tÞ;
ð1Þ
where ED0 is the data pulse amplitude, T D is the pulse full width at half maximum, and xD is the angular frequency of data pulses. This pulse is sent into a HNLF together with a continuous wave at different frequency. Due to the cross-phase modulation, the data pulse shape will be imprinted in the phase of CW field at the output of HNLF,
EX ðtÞ ¼ expfim exp½4 lnð2Þt 2 =T 2D ixX tg;
Fig. 2. Pulse converted by the FBG when the CW is tuned to the resonance (dash) and when it has an offset of 6 GHz (solid). An inset shows detail for small power levels.
ð2Þ
where xX is the angular frequency of CW, m ¼ 2c2 Leff PD is the modulation index, c2 is the nonlinear coefficient of the fiber, P D ¼ jED0 j2 is the data pulse peak power,
Leff ¼
1 expðaLÞ
a
;
ð3Þ
is the effective length of the fiber, and a is the fiber loss coefficient. Here we omitted plethora of effects that occur in nonlinear dispersive fibers like dispersion and self-phase modulation (SPM) of data pulses, walk-off, parametric processes, PM/AM conversion as a result of XPM and dispersion, modulation instability (MI), and Stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS). This is justified as long as we work in the regime where the dispersive length of pulses is long compared to the length of the fiber, their peak power is not excessively high, the CW power is sufficiently low so that parametric processes, MI and SBS are unimportant and CW is sufficiently detuned from the input pulses. These conditions are met in our experiment. To facilitate comparison with the experiment we will keep the data pulse width T D ¼ 2:5 ps and XPM modulation index m ¼ p throughout the simulations. The converted signal is found from the spectrum of the XPM signal and the complex transmission function HðxÞ of the FBG as
EC ðtÞ ¼ F1 fHðxÞF½EX ðtÞg;
Fig. 3. Conversion of a long sequence of consecutive pulses. A frequency offset of 6 GHz was used.
ð4Þ
1
where F½ and F ½ denotes Fourier transform and its inverse. The complex transmission function of the uniform FBG can be written as [20]
HðxÞ ¼
cðxÞ expðipL=KÞ ; cðxÞ coshðcðxÞLÞ irðxÞ sinhðcðxÞLÞ
where L is the FBG length,
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi cðxÞ ¼ jjj2 rðxÞ2 ;
ð5Þ Fig. 4. An experimental set-up. DS-data source, MLL-modelocked laser, PA-preamplifiers, BA-booster amplifier, MOD-modulator, OMUX-optical time domain multiplexer, F-filters, PC-polarization controllers, CWL-CW laser, DCA-data communication analyzer, RX-receiver, CRU-clock recovery unit.
1746
P. Honzatko / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 1744–1749
n01 ¼ 1:46409528 0:00829634k 0:00184767k2 ;
ð6Þ
where the wavelength k should be substituted in lm. The grating period K ¼ 534:6 nm provides Bragg resonance at 1547 nm. The coupling strength is related to the resonance transmission T 0 expressed in dB as
jL ¼ arccoshð10T 0 =20 Þ:
ð7Þ
The uniform grating used in the experiment had a transmission dip depth of 24.5 dBm and bandwidth of 0.13 nm that correspond to the coupling strength of jL ¼ 3:5, and number of grating periods 30,800, respectively.
First we study the wavelength conversion of a solitary Gaussian pulse. Using the presented model we obtain the converted pulse that is presented in Fig. 2. The pulse has a peak power P pk ¼ 3:2PX , where P X is the power of continuous wave. The pulse propagation time through the FBG is 80.4 ps. A small magnitude trailing pulse appears as a result of perturbation of the backward wave in the grating. As can be seen in Fig. 2, the conversion efficiency can be further improved and the trailing peak suppressed when the CW laser has a negative frequency offset with respect to the Bragg resonance. This offset leads to lower background suppression, however. There is a trade-off between the trailing pulse magnitude and the background suppression.
Fig. 5. Eye diagrams of (a) input and (b) converted pulses at 10 Gb/s.
P. Honzatko / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 1744–1749
The resonant mode perturbation have to decay before the arrival of the next pulse. In opposite case, the perturbation would accumulate in the grating preventing proper function of the converter. I therefore investigated the response of the converter to the long sequence of consecutive pulses. I found that our grating should work almost perfectly for repetition rates up to 40 Gb/s. The result of conversion of 16 consecutive ‘‘ones” is shown in Fig. 3. For this repetition rate the field of the resonant mode almost relaxes to its steady state before the arrival of the next pulse and only a small transient effect at the beginning of the long sequence can be observed.
1747
3. Experiment The experimental set-up is shown in Fig. 4. As a source of RZ pulses I used the mode-locked laser ðu2 tÞ generating a periodic train of pulses with a repetition rate of 10 GHz, a wavelength of 1563 nm, and a pulse-width of 1.5 ps. These pulses were preamplified, filtered, and modulated with Mach–Zehnder intensity modulator MOD driven from the pseudorandom bit sequence generator PRBS (up to 231 1, Centellax), that was synchronized to the mode-locked laser signal via receiver RX (Bookham) and clock recovery unit CRU (Centellax). Pulses from the data
Fig. 6. Eye diagrams of (a) input and (b) converted pulses at 20 Gb/s.
1748
P. Honzatko / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 1744–1749
source were eventually multiplexed to 20 Gb/s or 40 Gb/s in optical multiplexer (OMUX, u2t), and then amplified by booster amplifier BA and coupled into the highly nonlinear fiber HNLF (OFS) using the reflecting port of a coarse wavelength division multiplexer (CWDM) centered at 1551 nm (Opneti). The HNLF with a length L ¼ 50 m, a zero dispersion wavelength of 1506 nm and a 1 was used in the experinonlinear coefficient c ¼ 11 W1 km ment. At the output of the NZ-DSF, the RZ pulses and CW were separated by another CWDM. The average power of amplified and filtered pulses was 19.1 dBm and their duration at the input of the HNLF was 2.5 ps FWHM. The energy of pulses was estimated to be 8.1 pJ at 10 Gb/s and their peak power to be 2.9 W that cor-
responds approximately to a nonlinear phase shift of p. Light of a CW laser was amplified to 12 dBm and coupled into the HNLF using the pass port of the CWDM. Polarization controllers (PC3–PC4) were used to obtain the best magnitude of converted pulses. The converted RZ pulses were detected by fast receiver for 40 Gb/s (u2t) and analyzed by the data communication analyzer (DCA8100, Agilent). The eye diagram of input pulses and of converted pulses for 10 Gb/s data stream can be seen in Fig. 5. It can be seen that an excellent quality of converted signal can be attained. Some jitter that can be observed on the detected pulses is caused by group delay variations and probably would be removed if the synchronization signal for DCA was derived from
Fig. 7. Eye diagrams of (a) input and (b) converted pulses at 40 Gb/s.
P. Honzatko / Optics Communications 283 (2010) 1744–1749
the output signal. The pulse duration of the converted pulses was estimated to be 4 ps based on the autocorrelation measurement and the data from home-made optical sampling oscilloscope. I also performed an experiment with format conversion at 20 Gb/s. The signal from our RZ-pulses source was multiplexed to 20 Gb/s in an optical time domain multiplexer (OMUX) preserving the PRBS 27 1. The average power of RZ pulses was kept at 19.1 dBm, so the pulse energy was reduced to 4.1 pJ and the peak nonlinear phase shift reduced to p=2. Nevertheless, clear eye diagram was obtained at this repetition rate demonstrating scalability of the device toward the higher bit-rates (Fig. 6). When the input RZ pulses were further multiplexed to 40 Gb/s, the eye diagram of converted pulses was almost closed (Fig. 7). It was a combined result of the jitter imposed by the synchronization scheme used in the experiment, insufficient peak power of input RZ pulses, that was further reduced by a factor of two, and possibly by the transient effects in the FBG itself. 4. Conclusion I presented new method of wavelength conversion. The converter is based on fiber XPM with subsequent conversion of PM into AM in the fiber Bragg grating. The interference between the Bragg grating resonant mode and forward wave is exploited for conversion of PM into AM. Because an energy accumulated in the resonant mode is utilized, the converter has up to 6 dB better conversion efficiency then a converter based on nonlinear optical loop mirror and an order of magnitude better conversion efficiency then the wavelength converter based on sideband filtration. Numerical analysis and experimental results are provided for bit rates up to 40 Gb/s. Acknowledgement This project was supported by the program ‘‘Information society” of the Czech Academy of Sciences (1ET300670502). References [1] B.-E. Olsson, P. Ohlen, L. Rau, D.J. Blumenthal, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 12 (7) (2000) 846.
1749
[2] L. Rau, W. Wang, H. Poulsen, D. Blumenthal, 160 Gb/s OTDM wavelength conversion using XPM in dispersion shifted fiber, in: Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Optical Society of America, 2004, p. FA7. [3] W. Wang, H.N. Poulsen, L. Rau, D.J. Blumenthal, H.-F. Chou, J.E. Bowers, G.-N. Lars, 80-Gb/s regenerative wavelength conversion using a hybrid Raman/EDFA gain-enhanced XPM converter with highly-nonlinear-fiber, in: Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Optical Society of America, 2003, p. TuH2. [4] W. Wang, H.N. Poulsen, L. Rau, H.-F. Chou, J.E. Bowers, D.J. Blumenthal, J. Lightw. Technol. 23 (3) (2005) 1105. [5] J. Yu, X. Zheng, C. Peucheret, A.T. Clausen, H.N. Poulsen, P. Jeppesen, J. Lightw. Technol. 18 (7) (2000) 1001. [6] J. Yu, P. Jeppesen, S.N. Knudsen, Electronics Lett. 37 (9) (2001) 577. [7] C. Vinegoni, M. Wegmuller, B. Huttner, N. Gisin, Opt. Commun. 182 (4) (2000) 335. [8] K. Igarashi, H. Tobioka, S. Takasaka, R. Miyabe, J. Hiroishi, T. Yagi, O. Aso, S. Namiki, Wavelength conversion characteristics of highly efficient fiberoptic four-wave mixer for 160 GHz picosecond pulse train, in: Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Optical Society of America, 2004, p. TuC6. [9] J.H. Lee, K. Kikuchi, T. Nagashima, T. Hasegawa, S. Ohara, N. Sugimoto, Opt. Express 13 (8) (2005) 3144. [10] M. P. Fok, C. Shu, D. J. Blumenthal, 40-Gb/s polarization multiplexed RZ-ASKDPSK signal wavelength conversion using a 32-cm bismuth-oxide highly nonlinear fiber, in: CLEO/Europe and IQEC 2007 Conference Digest, Optical Society of America, 2007, pp. CI4–2. [11] L. Fu, M. Pelusi, E. Mägi, V. Ta’Eed, B. Eggleton, Electronics Lett. 44 (1) (2008) 44. [12] Y. Liu, E. Tangdiongga, Z. Li, H. de Waardt, A.M. Koonen, G.D. Khoe, X. Shu, I. Bennion, H.J.S. Dorren, J. Lightw. Technol. 25 (1) (2007) 103. [13] Y. Liu, M.T. Hill, E. Tangdiongga, H. De Waardt, N. Calabretta, G.D. Khoe, H.J.S. Dorren, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 15 (1) (2003) 90. [14] M.W.K. Mak, H.K. Tsang, Electronics Lett. 36 (2) (2000) 152. [15] L. Xu, I. Glesk, V. Baby, P.R. Prucnal, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 16 (2) (2004) 539. [16] S. Nakamura, Y. Ueno, K. Tajima, Error-free all-optical data pulse regeneration at 84 Gbps and wavelength conversion at 168 Gbps and wavelength conversion at 168 Gbps with symmetric mach-zehnder all-optical switches, in: Optical Amplifiers and Their Applications, Optical Society of America, 2000, p. OWB7. [17] S. Nakamura, T. Tamanuki, Y. Ueno, K. Tajima, Ultrafast optical demultiplexing, regeneration, and wavelength-conversion with symmetric-mach-zehnder alloptical switches, in: Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Optical Society of America, 2003, p. WG1. [18] W. Zhao, M.L. Masanovic, D.J. Blumenthal, G. Fish, J. Opt. Netw. 6 (8) (2007) 1014. [19] P. Honzatko, Wavelength converters based on fiber XPM and fiber Bragg gratings, in: Proceeding of 2009 11th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, 2009, p. We.C2.4. [20] M. Kulishov, J. Azaña, Opt. Express 15 (10) (2007) 6152.