JOURNAL
OF NUCLEAR
15,3 (1965) 201-207 0, NORTH-HOLLAND
MATERIALS
AN ANALYSIS
OF CREEP DUCTILITY
OF MAGNOX
PUBLISHING
CO., AMSTERDAM
AL80 AND ITS IMPLICATIONS
J. E. HARRIS Berkeley
Nuclear
Laboratories
of he
Received
The
ductility-temperature
crystalline wt
%
relationships
magnesium-O.8
beryllium
alloy
relationship
based
on heterogeneous
and theories
growth
casts are made
by
La
nucleation
l’alliage
entre
polycristallin
cavit&
de Stroh
de lacunes.
at particles of this alloy
ductilitb
et
under
ult&ieure
Des p&visions
en sent
alliage
possibles
sent
Die
Beziehungen
ratur
fiir
eine
alliage
dans
les
et les diverses
les propri&%
zwischen
en utilisant de
sur des
par condensation du point
(1)
where y is the surface energy and G the shear modulus. This equation, which strictly only applies for an elastic body, has been used successfully by McLean 2) to determine the
Dehnbarkeit
polykristalline
Al+0,005
de cet
Gew.-%
und die Theorie
erkllirt
Diese Theorie
werden.
kondensation. macht,
um
werden
Reaktorbedingungen MBglichkeiten werden
die
basiert
auf der heteroPartikeln
durch
Planungsvorschliige dieser
zu priifen.
zur Verbesserung
Legierung
Mehrere ihrer
und
Hohlraumgeunter
verschiedene Eigenschaften
diskutiert.
transition and
iiber
der Hohlraumbildung
Wachstum
Betragen
aus Mgf
Be kijnnen
an verschiedenen
Es das
und Tempe-
Legierung
Stroh-Gleichung
nachfolgenden
deduites
cet
reacteur
d’ambliorer
einem
h&&og&ne
de
d’un
discuthes.
% Al en poids-
The Stroh 1) condition for fracture at the head of a sliding interface of length L under an applied shear stress os is: 12yG 1/ 7CL
m&hodes
comportement d’utilisation
Keimbildung
Cracking
q>
du
genen
The purpose of this paper is to examine if modern theories of nucleation and propagation of creep fracture can account for the tensile ductility-temperature relationships of a magnesium-0.80 wt oh aluminium-0.005 wt oh beryllium alloy (Magnox ALBO). This alloy is used as a canning material in the UK nuclear reactors and some comments are made on creep failure under service conditions. 1.
vue
conditions
pour
6tre expliqube
UK
1964
0,8 Gew.-%
et les thPiories de formation
et la croissance
Glos.,
and
temperature
magn&ium-0,8
de
Berkeley,
Fore-
are discussed.
bashes sur la germination
particules
the
formation
and various possible methods
0,005 % Be en poids peut la relation
poly-
using
condensation.
on the behaviour
its properties
relation
for
30 October
aluminium-0.005
of cavity
vacancy
reactor service conditions of improving
oh
can be explained
Stroh
subsequent
wt
CEGB,
stress
cavitation
between of
a
triple
Nimonic
point alloy.
cracking For
this
L an estimate of the maximum length of sliding grain boundary. For a given tensile strain rate, the maximum stress maintained during a test will fall as the temperature is raised and it is thus possible to calculation
he
used
for
define a maximum temperature above which triple-point cracking does not occur. Such a theoretical transition temperature has been found 3) to be in reasonable agreement with experimental observations on polycrystalline magnesium deformed rapidly. Taking y = 600 ergs/cm2 and G= 1.3 x 1011 dynes/cmz, this temperature, called here the S&-oh-McLean transition, has now been determined for the 1 %/h tests on Magnox AL80 carried out by Brookes et aZ.4) (see fig. la). During this type of deformation in the cracking range, fracture is rarely achieved by the nucleation and propagation of a single crack but rather by the 201
202
5.
E.
HARRIS
(as) has been assumed to be half the applied tensile stress and this may have led to a slight overestimate 2.
of the transition
temperature.
Cavity Nucleation In
argued
in a review
1961,
convincingly
nucleated
paper,
that
heterogeneously
creep
Co&e11 5) has cavities
at particles.
are
There
is some evidence for an association of creep cavities with particles in Magnox AL80 6) and recently it has been demonstrated are sufficient
second
phase
3)
that there
particles
in this
material to nucleate all the cavities observed in typical creep specimens (fig. 2). Vacancies will condense onto non-wetting particles in grain boundaries orientated normal to an applied tensile stress G if the particles are larger than a critical diameter d, given by 7) :
dr
2n
dt
t 3 ”
-
62 un
kTmr
given by 3) :
‘-lp m-lop
l-09 r-0
Ogb
In fig. lb, the critical diameter for the 1 %/h tests on Magnox AL80 is plotted as a function of temperature. Particles slightly smaller than the critical diameter may act as cavity nuclei if the grain boundary sliding rate B exceeds the longitudinal sintering rate and if intersecting slip spreads the void laterally faster than axial sintering. The critical grain boundary sliding velocity is
1’ ,
, 100
,
, 200
,
, 300
TEMPERATURE
,
, 400
,
, 500
B
_
D&Z rzlnf
2YQ
-exp kTr ’1
(3)
*C
Fig.
1. 1 %/h tensile test on Magnox AL80 4): (a) ductility-temperature plot showing the StrohMcLean transition and the Hull and Rimmer predictions; (b) critical diameter for cavity nucleation versus temperature; (c) radial rate of sintering versus temperature; (d) cavity growth rate by vacancy condensation versus temperature.
nucleation and impingement of many. Thus, in order to isolate the “general cracking” range from cavitation, the length of sliding interface has been taken here as equal to the mean grain diameter (0.18 mm). The maximum shear stress
where &b is the atomic grain boundary diffusion coefficient, 6z the grain boundary width, Q the atomic volume, r the particle radius, a the radius of the annular sink and k and T have their usual meaning. In fig. lc, the rate of radial sintering for a 500 J%diameter particle has been plotted again& temperature. For these calculations the following values have been used ; Bz = 10-T cm, y= 600 ergs cm-z, Q= 2.3 x lo-23 cm3 and a= 10-3 cm. It has been assumed that the activat,ion energy for grain boundary diffusion is 19 200 cal/mole, i.e. 0.6 times the activation
CREEP
Fig.
DUCTILITY
OF
AL80
203
2. Electron transmission photograph of Magnox AL80 specimen quenched from 600” C. The nume1‘OUS x8000 particles within the foil can be distinguished by the dislocations generated around them.
energy for lattice diffusion s), the frequency factor remaining unchanged at 1 cm2/sec. 3.
MAGNOX
Cavity
Using Rimmer ship for diffusion
Growth
as their starting point eq. (2), Hull and 9) have derived the following relationthe rate of growth by grain boundary of a cavity of radius r and spacing m: dr
2nDgbBzuQ
z-
lcTmr
(4)
’
By assuming that failure eventually occurs by the growth and impingement of the voids, an expression derived :
for
the
time
to
tr -
a%T 167KrSZD,b6x *
rupture
was
(5)
There are valid objections to Hull and Rimmer’s analysis and it is wrong to apply their model too literally. For example if most of the strain during creep is attributed to the opening-up of voids 5) then the objection of Feltham 10) that the analysis is inconsistent with the stress exponent and activation energy determined experimentally, would apply. In addition, during the final stages of tertiary
creep the inter-void areas would become highly stressed leading to necking and cracking between the cavities. Furthermore Greenwood 11) has pointed out that the analysis predicts a change in specimen density with time, at variance with the careful experimental measurements of Boettner and Robertson 12). The discrepancy can be resolved if it is postulated ii) that the voids are not all nucleated at the beginning of the test, but form progressively during the course of the deformation. Hull and Rimmer 9) admit the possibility of stressnucleated cavitation but this process is difficult to incorporate into a simple analytical expression for the time to rupture. However the basic assumptions of the Hull and Rimmer analysis, heterogeneous nucleation of cavities at particles 51s) and their subsequent growth by vacancy condensation sJs), now seem to be well established and the refinements in theory do not invalidate order-of-magnitude calculations. For example, Brookes et aZ.4) have illustrated the structure of a Magnox AL80 specimen which fractured in 1700 hours at 225’ C under a stress of 142 kg/cm2. The theoretical cavity spacing for this test calculated from eq. (5) is 17 pm and this is in reasonable
204
J.
agreement with a spacing of 25 to deduced from their photomicrograph. During a constant to failure is directly elongation, calculate
E.
50 ,um
strain rate test the time proportional to the final
Thus, from eq. (5) it is possible to the theoretical
elongation
at fracture
HARRIS
growth would be rapid (fig. Id) leading to lowductility failure (fig. la). If cavities could be nucleated at temperatures > 300” C then they would grow rapidly enough to give brittle failure (fig. la). However, at these high temperatures
the critical
diameters
as a function of temperature. These “Null & Rimmer” predictions for 1 %jh tests have been
become large and sintering rates are extremely fast, nueleation is thus inhibited and the material
superimposed
fails in a ductile manner by localised to almost 100 o/o reduction in area.
onto
ature-ductility growth
rate
the experimental
plot in fig. la. (eq.
temper-
In fig.
Id the
(4)) has been plotted
as a
function of temperature. For these calculations, which will be used here simply to illustrate the temperature dependence of fracture and growth, an arbitrary void spacing of 10 pm has been chosen.
4.
Ducti~ty-Temperature
Relationship
icant size. On this interpretation, optimum conditions for cavitational failure occurs only in the narrow temperature range 250 + to 300” C. Here, although the stress is too low for Stroh-McLean cracking, the critical diameters are still smaller than particles seen quite frequexltly in electron transmission specimens a). In addition, although sintering rates are fairly rapid, local bursts of grain boundary sliding should be capable of forming stable void nuclei from particles slightly smaller than the critical size. Subsequent void 7 In practice,
true
cavitation
failures
occur
as low as 190’ C in 1 Oh/h tests.
at
influence
of
primary
and
secondary
recrystallisation on fracture characteristics has been discussed elsewhere 14-17).These effects are important, for example the fall in ductility above 400” C is probably due to excessive grain growth which results in the deformation concentrated into only a few grains. 5,
An explanation of the temperature-ductility relationships of the 1 %/h tests illustrated in fig. la, is now possible. At low temperatures ( < N ‘200” C) the stresses maintained during the tests are high and the critical diameters correspondingly small (< N 700 A). Moreover, even particles smaller than the critical diameter can act as nuclei in sliding grain boundaries, since the sintering rate is low (fig. 1~). However, the cavity growth rates by vacancy condensation are also low (fig. Id) and as these temperatures are below the Stroh-McLean transition, failure occurs by cracking before the voids can grow to a signif-
temperatures
The
necking
being
App~ca~on of Theories to Reactor Operating Conditions
A large number of creep tests have been carried out on Magnox ALSO in the temperature range of interest for reactor applications (200 to 450” c). Recently these data have been analysed 18) and the following relationships established : d= 3.8 x lo-15 d-0.5 ~7 exp for stresses
(- 32 OOO/RT), > “r’ 2240 psi
2=5*g x IO-4 d-0.8 03.5 exp ( - 32 000~~~)~ for stresses > N 80 and -: N 2240 psi d--90
d-2
oT-1 exp (-32
(6)
(7)
OOO/RT),
for stresses
< N 80 psi
(8)
where d is the steady state creep rate and d is the mean grain diameter in inches. The fuel elements remain in the reactor for a maximum period of five years and a suitable design criterion is that the can must not deform more than 1 O/Oin 40 000 hours. If, as is reasonable for these slow rates of deformation, primary strain is ignored, this corresponds to a secondary creep rate of 2.5 x 10-‘/h. Using this criterion, it is possible to calculate from eqs. (6) to (8) for a given temperature, the maximum stress generated in a can as a function of its grain size.
These
relationships,
for
the
grain
size
CREEP
‘DUCTILITY
range 0.25 to 0.0025 cm (0.1 to 0.001 inches) at 450, 300 and 200’ C are given in figs. 3a, b and c respectively and designated “design” curves. Similar curves are presented for an arbitrary “fault” condition of 1 O/Jdeformation in 400 hours (i.e. a creep rate of 2.5 x 10-5/h). 6.
Cracking
As described earlier, using eq. (1), the minimum stress necessary for triple point cracking can be calculated for each grain size. Such “cracking” curves have been compared with the corresponding “design” and “fault” curves in fig. 3. The average as-charged grain size of high STRESS
(Kg.
CM-2)
0.1
OF
ERAGE AS- CHARGED. .-*-.-.-.-.-. GRAIN SIZE. 0.01
Fig. 3. Stress generated in a Nagnox ALSO can at imposed defo~tion rates of 1 o/0in 40 000 hours (Design) and 1 o/oin 400 hours (Fault) as a function of grain size. From the Stroh relationship the minimum stress for triple point cracking (Cracking) hes also been plotted against grain size; only where the cnrves cross is such cracking possible. The horizontal dotted lines oorrespond to the average as-charged gain sizes in UX reactors.
AL80
205
temperature fuel element cans (> - 390'C) is 0.038 cm (0.015 inches) and for low temperature cans is 0.018 cm (0.007 inches). From fig. 3 it is clear that even if considerable grain coarsening occurred, there is no possibility of the material reaching the theoretical cracking stress at 300 and 450” C. Cracki~lg should also be avoided at 200"C even under the specified fault condition for here no grain growth should occur. However, the analysis indicates that it would probably be unsafe to use material with grain size > 0.02inches at 200” C and thus trouble may be experienced with “shuffled” + oans at this temperature. The implication, so far, is that in normal circumstances triple point cracking should not occur in reactor cans. It follows that the most likely fracture mode is cavitation and there have been reports of this type of can failure rs,z*). 7.
0.01
NAGNOX
Cavitation
Again using eqs. (6) to (S), it is possible to calculate the stress correspon~ng to the 1 o/O in 40 000 hours criterion as a function of temperature for a fixed grain size of 0.018 cm (0.007 inches). Then, using equation (2) a plot of critical particle diameter versus temperatnre can be prepared (fig. 4). Also included is another arbitrary fault condition of a 1 o/oin 400 hours creep rate for material with an average grain size of 0.051 cm (0.02 inches). The “design” curve in fig. 4 demonstrates that even at the minimum reactor temperatures the critical diameter is as large as 0.5to 1 ,um. Such particles would just be visible in the optical microscope and in fact, are not seen frequently enough in reactor Magnox to account for a significant cavity nucleation rate (a relatively large number of nuclei would be needed to cause failure owing to the low cavity growth rates at these low temperatures, see fig. 1). In addition, at this slow rate of deformation, the average grain boundary sliding rate (- 4 x IO-9 cm/h) is much slower than rates of t “Shuffling” consists of moving fuel elements from hot regions to cooler parts of the reactor core (and vice versa) t#qobta& qveq bqrg-up qf the fuel,
206
J.
E.
HARRIS
cavitation range of temperatures may be due simply to the lower creep resistance of the finer grained material. This leads to a lower stress for a given imposed deformation rate and a correspondingly larger critical diameter. This effect is illustrated in fig. 5 where the critical diameter for a 1 y0 in 40 000 hours (2.5 x 10-7/h) strain rate at 200” C is plotted
against grain
size. Another effect which could lead to a lower cavity nucleation rate is that the average grain boundary
sliding rate is decreased as the grain
size is decreased (fig. 5). Grain boundary sliding may be important during the early stages of cavity formation at sub-critical particles. An alternative method of improving creep ductility would be to remove the second phase particles or at least keep their maximum size
250
200 I CRITICAL
Fig. 4.
DIAMETER
Critical particle diameter for cavity nucleation
versus temperature
for Magnox
size 0.018
cm deformed
in 40 000
hours
0.051
(CM)
(Design)
cm deformed
AL80
of mean gram
at an imposed and
of mean
at an imposed
MEAN
rate of 1 y0 grain
rate of
size
1 y0 in
GRAIN
DIAMETER
0.01
(CMS) 0.1
9t
400 hours (Fault).
radial sintering (- 4x 10-4 cm/h for a 0.1 ,um particle at 200” C) making it improbable that particles much smaller than the critical size can act as nuclei. It follows that, if no part of the can is strained at a rate faster than the design criterion (2.5 x 10-‘/h), then few cavities will be nucleated and brittle failure will not occur. condition the specified fault Under (2.5 x lo-s/h),
particles
in the range
1000 to
2000 A could act as cavity nuclei at the lower reactor temperatures and such particles occur in reactor Magnox 3).
8.
Production
of Ductile Magnox 1
It is well known that refining the grain structure increases creep ductility and this is exploited in the production of ductile cans 2s). In the cracking range this effect is easy to understand, for a reduction in grain size leads to a reduction in the length of grain boundary sliding interface. An improved ductility in the
0.01
0.001 MEAN
Fig. 5.
GRAIN
DIAMETER
(INCHES)
Critical particle diameter for cavity nucleation
versus average grain size of Magnox deformation
in 40 000
hours
at
average rates of grain boundary plotted
against
grain size for deformation.
AL80
for 1 o/0
200” C. Estimated
sliding has also been the
same
rate
of
CREEP
below about 500 A. However
DUOTILITY
the high vapour
pressure of magnesium would make, for example, zone-reining
operations
carry out and may preclude prove possible addition of a that
the
ductility
extremely
difficult
to
the low density of magnesium centrifugal separation. It may to clean up the material by the scavenging element: it is likely
observed
improvement
in
tensile
on adding beryllium 4) is due to some
such effect.
0%’ %XAaNOX
Acknowledgements A
number
of
of the Central Electricity
There have been examples in UK reactors of small leaks in the end welds of the can resulting in the build-up of uranium oxide at the fuel/can interface and the volume changes being accommodated by local deformation of the can wall. Where the original leak has been too small to be detected by the Burst Cartridge Detection Gear, the first warning of the fault has been the final rupture of the can wall which has only occurred after extensive deformation, following the build up of a large oxide mound 21-23). The large radial dimensional changes in the fuel elements lead to difficulties during discharge and an ultimate danger here is that of blocking the coolant gas flow in the channel. The ideal can material in these circumstances may be envisaged to be one which is ductile at very slow rates of strain, but which fails in a brittle manner when the deformation rate is increased during the build-up of the oxide mound and thus gives an early warning of the fault. At low temperatures ( < 250” C) this may be achieved with a coarse-grained inclusion-free alloy, for such material would not cavitate at slow strain rates, but at high rates of deformation the cracking stress would be exceeded and brittle failure occur (fig. 3). At higher temperatures it would be necessary to control the size of the inclusions such that they are smaller than the critical size for cavity nucleation at low rates of deformation yet Iarger than the critical size when the stress rises under the fault condition.
discussions
with
Generating
Board.
References A. N. Stroh, Proe. Roy. Sot. 223 (A) (1954) 404 D.
McLean,
J. E.
Inst.
Metals
85
CEGB
Report
No.
to Trans.
Brookes,
J. Inst. A.
J.
Harris,
I?. E.
Fast Burst Failures
valuable
Dr. G. W. Greenwood are gratefully acknowledged, This paper is published by permission
submitted
9.
207
AL80
H.
Iron
N.
Kirby
and
88 (1959-60)
Cottrell,
Structural
Steel
Symposium
Inst.
(1961)
468
RD/B/N
325
AIME
Metals
and
(1956-57)
W.
T.
Burke,
500 Processes
and
Inst.
in Creep,
Metals
Joint
1
5. E. Harris, V. J. Haddrell and G. K. Rickerds, J. Nuel. R.
W.
Mat.
6 (1962)
Balluffi
144
and L.
L.
Seigle, Acta
Met.
5
(1957) 449 P. G. Shewmon and F. N. Rhines, Trans. Amer. Inst.
Min. Met.
Eng.
200 (1954)
1021
D. Hull and D. E. Rimmer, Phil. Msg. 4 (1959) 673 P, Feltham,
Structural
Processes in Creep, Iron
and Steel Inst. and Inst. Metals Joint Symposium (1961)
82
G. W.
Greenwood,
R.
C. Boettner
Amer.
Inst.
R.
Ratcliffe
T.
Phil. M&g. 8 (1963)
and
W.
Min. Met. and
D.
Eng.
G. W.
707
Robertson,
Trans.
221
613
(1961)
Greenwood,
(to be
published) C. W. Inst.
Chen and E. Min. Met.
R. D. Staeey,
S. LMaehlin, Trans.
Eng.
218 (1960)
J. Inst.
Amer.
177
Metals 89 (1960-61)
399
J. E. Harris and P. G. Partridge, Proc. Berkeley Conf. on Properties of Reactor Materials and the Effticts of Radiation worths,
Damage
(London,
Butter-
1962) 359
J. E. Harris,
Nature
200
(1963)
1197
J. E.
and R.
B.
Jones,
CEGB
No.
Harris RD/B/R
Laboratories,
144
(1963)
Berkeley,
Report
Berkeley
Nuclear
Glos.
V. W.
Eldred,
J. Inst. Metals 89 (1960-61)
V. W.
Eldred,
The Metallurgist
H. K. Hardy,
J. F. W.
Bishop,
3 (1964) D. 0.
Pickman
and V. W. Eldred, J. Brit. Nucl. Energy (1963) 33 G. W. Greenwood U.N.
and
B.
F.
Sot.
Sharpe,
2
Third
Int. Conf. on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic
Energy, Geneva, paper No. 28/P/148 G. F. Hines and A. G. Uglow, CEGB Lab)
395 57
Report
Nuol. Energy
No.
RD/B/N
809. 4 (1965)
307 66
(1964)
(1964) (Berkeley J.’ @it,