Antimalarial drug quality in Gabon

Antimalarial drug quality in Gabon

16th ICID Abstracts / International Journal of Infectious Diseases 21S (2014) 1–460 Type: Poster Presentation Type: Poster Presentation Final Abstr...

63KB Sizes 50 Downloads 128 Views

16th ICID Abstracts / International Journal of Infectious Diseases 21S (2014) 1–460

Type: Poster Presentation

Type: Poster Presentation

Final Abstract Number: 52.033 Session: Epidemiology and Public Health II Date: Friday, April 4, 2014 Time: 12:45-14:15 Room: Ballroom

Final Abstract Number: 52.034 Session: Epidemiology and Public Health II Date: Friday, April 4, 2014 Time: 12:45-14:15 Room: Ballroom

Antimalarial drug quality in Gabon

Risk factors of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Kuala Lumpur

B.J. Visser 1,∗ , D. Kroon 1 , M.P. Grobusch 2 1 Centre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné (CERMEL), Lambaréné, Gabon & Academic Medical Centre (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Lambaréné, Gabon 2 Academic Medical Centre - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Background: In Gabon, antimalarial drugs are widely available in both the private as well in the public sector and often selfdescribed (correctly and incorrectly) for the many febrile episodes attributed to malaria. Insufficient facilities to check the quality of antimalarial drugs, poor patient knowledge about these drugs; their relative high costs and the lack of appropriate regulatory and legal actions by the government make these drugs attractive for counterfeiters. Reports of poor quality and falsified drugs have increased in the past decade and evidence that a considerable proportion of drugs consumed in the developing world are of poor quality (often with no active or wrong ingredients) is emerging. Falsified drugs are an immediate threat for public health and have led to a great number of deaths from untreated malaria. For Gabon, there is no (published) data about the quality of available antimalarial drugs. We hypothesize that poor-quality anti-malarial drugs are prevalent in Gabon. The objective is to describe the quality of available antimalarial drugs and to determine the prevalence of poor quality antimalarial drugs in the Republic of Gabon. Methods & Materials: Methods: - Prospective observational drug-quality field survey. Packaging analysis and chemical drugquality analysis with the GPHF Minilab. Main study outcomes: The primary outcome is the prevalence of poor quality antimalarial drugs. Furthermore, the quality of available antimalarial drugs will be described. Secondary outcomes: The proportion of outlets selling poor quality antimalarial drugs; the availability and prevalence of antimalarial drugs that are no longer recommended as first or second-line treatment; the proportion of different types of poor quality medicines and the risk indicators of poor quality antimalarial drugs in terms of packaging or chemical analysis. Results: To be expected in January 2014 or latest February 2014 Conclusion: To be expected in January 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.03.950

255

A. Azmi 1,∗ , R. Ismail 1 , K.A. Md. Isa 1 , N. Ismail 2 1

Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia University of Technology MARA Sungai Buluh Campus, Sungai Buluh, Selangor, Malaysia 2

Background: Globally, the issue of Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) was acknowledged to being a threat to the successful prevention and treatment of TB. In Malaysia, TB remains a major health issue and incidence has been rising slowly for the past decade indicating poor success rate in Malaysia’s current TB control programme. Currently, very little epidemiological data can be found regarding the situation of TB and MDR-TB in Malaysia. Therefore, the objective of this retrospective study is to identify the independent risk factors associated with MDR-TB in Malaysia. Methods & Materials: 477 systematically randomized TB patients from the Institute of Respiratory Medicine (IPR) were sampled based on the records of patients in 2010. Data were divided based on four categories, sociodemographics, lifestyle and habits, co-morbidities and TB case management. Results: Among 477 patients sampled, 67.9% were male with mean age 37.2 (SD 14.9). 30% of patients were foreign born with the majority were from Myanmar (14.9%), Indonesia (9.4%) and Bangladesh (2.7%). In multivariate logistic analysis, BCG Status (AOR = 0.292, 95%CI 0.13-0.67) was found to be a protective risk factor while history of previous TB (AOR = 4.36, 95%CI 1.80-10.56) was a risk factor for MDR-TB. Conclusion: Whilst history of previous TB is a commonly acknowledged risk factor, the evidence of BCG as a protective factor for MDR-TB indicates that BCG vaccination is still a viable preventive measure. Therefore, this study recommends the continuation of of neonatal BCG vaccination and further research should also be carried out in order to allow the possiblity of reintroducing the booster shot which was administered several years after the initial vaccination. Research should not only focus on the cost effectiveness of the practise but also on the long-term viability of booster shot in protecting against TB and MDR-TB http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.03.951