Aquagenic pruritus in polycythemia vera: a cross-sectional study

Aquagenic pruritus in polycythemia vera: a cross-sectional study

Accepted Manuscript Aquagenic pruritus in polycythemia vera: a cross-sectional study Edyta Lelonek, MD, Assoc. Prof. Łukasz Matusiak, MD, Prof. Tomasz...

193KB Sizes 0 Downloads 71 Views

Accepted Manuscript Aquagenic pruritus in polycythemia vera: a cross-sectional study Edyta Lelonek, MD, Assoc. Prof. Łukasz Matusiak, MD, Prof. Tomasz Wróbel, MD, Prof. Jacek C. Szepietowski, MD PII:

S0190-9622(17)32577-X

DOI:

10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.021

Reference:

YMJD 12069

To appear in:

Journal of American Dermatology

Received Date: 23 February 2017 Revised Date:

29 September 2017

Accepted Date: 11 October 2017

Please cite this article as: Lelonek E, Matusiak Ł, Wróbel T, Szepietowski JC, Aquagenic pruritus in polycythemia vera: a cross-sectional study, Journal of American Dermatology (2017), doi: 10.1016/ j.jaad.2017.10.021. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Aquagenic pruritus in polycythemia vera: a cross-sectional study

2

Edyta Lelonek, MD1; Assoc. Prof. Łukasz Matusiak, MD1; Prof. Tomasz Wróbel, MD 2; Prof. Jacek

3

C Szepietowski MD 1

4

1

5

University, 50-368 Wrocław, Chałubińskiego 1, Poland;

6

2

7

Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Pasteura 4, Poland;

SC

Department and Clinic of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation,

8

10

Corresponding author: Edyta Lelonek, [email protected]

Chałubińskiego 1, 50-368 Wrocław, Poland; tel.: +48717842286; fax: +48713270942

11

1. Manuscript word count: 521

13

2. References: 5

14

3. Number of tables: 2

TE D

12

15

M AN U

9

RI PT

Department and Clinic of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical

Conflict of interest disclosures: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

17

Funding Sources: none.

18

IRB approval: The study was approved by the Ethic Committee of Wroclaw Medical

19

University (No. 355/2016).

AC C

20

EP

16

21

22

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT To the Editor: Polycythemia vera-associated pruritus and more specifically aquagenic pruritus

24

(AP) is characterized by the development of intense itching sensation without observable skin

25

lesions and brought on by contact with water of any temperature1. Although AP is recognized

26

as the most excruciating aspect of PV, the knowledge about its pathophysiology and precise

27

character is still vague. Therefore, this study was undertaken to analyze the clinical features of

28

AP and its associations with laboratory results.

29

The group of 102 patients with confirmed molecularly PV (present JAK2V617F mutation)

30

was examined. Demographic data, disease history, PV status and treatment modalities were

31

collected from all participants. AP intensity was evaluated with the visual analogue scale

32

(VAS), verbal rating scale (VRS) and a 4-item Itch Questionnaire (4-IQ). Furthermore, all

33

study participants underwent laboratory tests. Complete blood count, serum levels of lactate

34

dehydrogenase (LDH), uric acid (UA) and immunoglobulin E (IgE) were done. The detailed

35

characteristic of the study group is given in Table 1.

36

AP was present in 41.2% (42/102) of PV patients. A significant negative correlation between

37

hemoglobin concentration (HGB), hematocrit level (HCT) and pruritus severity assessed with

38

VRS and 4-IQ was found (p<0.05, for all correlations). Such a trend was also observed for

39

VAS, however did not reach statistical significance. Of note, the alterations in HGB or HCT

40

levels did not condition the presence or absence of AP among patients with PV (p>0.05)

41

(Table 2). Moreover, only morphology parameters (incl. HGB and HCT) were independent

42

factors responsible for increase/decrease of AP intensity, with no drug influence on PV-

43

associated itching.

44

The significant negative correlations between the intensity of pruritus and HGB or HCT noted

45

in our study seem to be consistent with previously reported data2. In contrast to our study,

46

some other authors discerned the presence of generalized pruritus due to the iron depletion

47

after phlebotomy3. However, iron replacement therapy has not been consistently effective in

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

23

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the treatment of AP4. This means that the root cause of the presence or intensity of AP in PV

49

patients is hidden elsewhere.

50

The correction of hematological parameters in PV is one of the main recommended strategies

51

for the improvement of PV-related systemic symptoms including pruritus2. Taking into

52

account the antiplatelet treatment, we did not find any significant associations with the

53

intensity of AP.

54

However, our data presented some contrasting findings showing that, lower HCT and HGB

55

levels (but within the normal range), could intensify itching among AP patients. It is not

56

completely clear if AP development was due to the decrease of HCT/ HGB levels, or occurred

57

because of another mechanism. This phenomenon could be explained by the symptomatic

58

action of these drugs without, in fact, affecting the clinical course of disease. It could be

59

further confirmed by the recent data with regards to treatment with JAK2-/JAK1-inhibitors5,

60

which could bring relief in the general symptoms such as fatigue, night sweats or itching due

61

to the targeting of the signal pathways of the EPO-receptor.

62

In conclusion, AP is a frequent, although seemingly underestimated, problem among PV

63

sufferers. Further research on the morphologic parameters and their associations with pruritus

64

could contribute to better understanding of the pathophysiology of AP and its management.

66 67 68 69

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

65

RI PT

48

70 71 72 73

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 74 75 76 77

References: 1. Steinmann HK, Graeves MW. Aquagenic pruritus. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985; 13: 91–6. 2. Siegel FP, Tauscher J, Petrides. Aquagenic pruritus in polycythemia vera:

79

Characteristics and influence on quality of life in 441 patients. Am. J. Hematol., 88:

80

665–669.

82

3. Gangat N, Strand JJ, Lasho TL, et al. Pruritus in polycythemia vera is associated with

SC

81

RI PT

78

a lower risk of arterial thrombosis. Am J Hematol 2008; 83: 451–3. 4. Jackson N, Burt D, Crocker J, et al. Skin mast cells in polycythaemia vera:

84

relationship to the pathogenesis and treatment of pruritus. Br J Dermatol 1987; 116:

85

21–9.

89 90 91 92 93 94 95

TE D

88

in myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1455–1457.

EP

87

5. Tefferi A, Litzow MR, Pardanani A. Long term outcome of treatment with ruxolitinib

AC C

86

M AN U

83

96 97 98 99

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 100 101 102

Table 1. Characteristics of studied group

AP

women

65

31

men

37

11

Age (years)†

66.9 ± 12.7

64.0 ± 13.8

69.0 ± 11.6

NS

BMI (kg/m2)†

26.8 ± 4.2

26.9 ± 4.7

26.8 ± 3.8

NS

Duration of PV (years)†

6.2 ± 5.9

6.8 ± 7.9

5.7 ± 4.1

NS

60.8 ± 12.5

57.2 ± 13.0

63.3 ± 11.5

0.02

26

15

11

NS

35

13

22

42

42

0

NA

3

0

3

NA

1

0

1

NA

5-hydroxyurea

75

30

45

NS

phlebotomy

66

28

38

acetylsalicylic acid

33

17

16

clopidogrel

5

4

1

anagrelid

4

3

1

pipobroman

6

1

5

Episodes of thrombosis (n)

arterial

AP senile pruritus atopic itch PV treatment (n)

EP

Presence of pruritus (n)

TE D

venous

M AN U

Age at diagnosis of PV (years)†

p-value*

34

NS

26

SC

Gender (n)

Non-AP

RI PT

Total

AC C

103

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 104

105 106

* – AP vs. non-AP, † – mean ± SD; AP – aquagenic pruritus, PV – polycythemia vera, NA – not applicable, NS – not significant

107

109

RI PT

108

Table 2. Characteristics of AP patients

6.6 ± 8.6

p-value*

NA

NA

5.2 ± 2.4

NA

NA

4.8 ± 1.9

NA

NA

28.6

NA

NA

38.1

NA

NA

21.4

NA

NA

11.9

NA

NA

6.0 ± 2.9

NA

NA

12.1 ± 14.4

14.4 ± 24.6

NS

5.4 ± 1.7

4.7 ± 1.2

NS

15.0 ± 2.9

15.3 ± 2.4

NS

45.6 ± 8.6

55.5 ± 66.0

NS

PLT (103/µL)

441.3 ± 227.9

435.0 ± 409.3

NS

LDH (U/L)

296.2 ± 148.7

320.6 ± 282.8

NS

UA (mg/dL)

5.1 ± 1.9

5.7 ± 1.4

NS

IgE (kU/L)

29.8 ± 46.4

20.7 ± 28.0

NS

AP duration (years)†

VASmax (points)† VASmean (points)† VRS (%)

‘mild’ ‘moderate’

TE D

‘severe’ ‘very severe’

4-item Itch Questionnaire (points)†

WBC (103/µL) RBC (106/µL)

AC C

HGB (g/dL)

EP

Laboratory results†

HCT (%)

M AN U

AP intensity

110 111 112 113

Non-AP

SC

AP

* – AP vs. non-AP, † – mean ± SD; AP – aquagenic pruritus, WBC – white blood cell count, RBC – red blood cell count, HGB – hemoglobin concentration, HCT – hematocrit level, PLT – platelet count, LDH – lactate dehydrogenase, UA – uric acid, IgE – immunoglobulin E; VAS – visual analogue scale, VRS – verbal rating scale, VASmax – maximum intensity of

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

pruritus during the last 3 days, VASmean – mean intensity of pruritus during the last 3 days, NA – not applicable, NS – not significant

AC C

114 115

7