Accepted Manuscript Association of Estradiol on Expression of Melanocortin Receptors and Their Accessory Proteins in the Liver of Chicken (Gallus gallus) Junxiao Ren, Yanmin Li, Naiyi Xu, Hong Li, Cuicui Li, Ruili Han, Yanbin Wang, Zhuanjian Li, Xiangtao Kang, Xiaojun Liu, Yadong Tian PII: DOI: Reference:
S0016-6480(16)30337-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2016.10.012 YGCEN 12516
To appear in:
General and Comparative Endocrinology
Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:
4 April 2016 18 October 2016 24 October 2016
Please cite this article as: Ren, J., Li, Y., Xu, N., Li, H., Li, C., Han, R., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Kang, X., Liu, X., Tian, Y., Association of Estradiol on Expression of Melanocortin Receptors and Their Accessory Proteins in the Liver of Chicken (Gallus gallus), General and Comparative Endocrinology (2016), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen. 2016.10.012
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1
Association of Estradiol on Expression of Melanocortin Receptors and
2
Their Accessory Proteins in the Liver of Chicken (Gallus gallus)
3
Junxiao Ren1†, Yanmin Li1†, Naiyi Xu 1, Hong Li1, Cuicui Li1, Ruili Han1, 2, 3, Yanbin
4
Wang1, 2, 3, Zhuanjian Li1, 2, 3, Xiangtao Kang1, 2, 3, Xiaojun Liu 1, 2, 3*, Yadong Tian1, 2, 3
5
*
6 7
1
8
Zhengzhou 450002, China
9 10 11 12
2
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University,
Henan Innovative Engineering Research Center of Poultry Germplasm Resource,
Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China 3
International Joint Research Laboratory for Poultry Breeding of Henan, Henan
Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
13 14
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
15 16
*Corresponding authors
17
Yadong Tan:
[email protected]
18
Xiaojun Liu:
[email protected]
19 20 21 22
23
Abstract
24
The melanocortin receptor accessory proteins (MRAP and MRAP2) are small
25
single-pass transmembrane proteins that regulate the biological functions of the
26
melanocortin receptor (MCR) family. MCRs comprise five receptors (MC1R–MC5R)
27
with diverse physiological roles in mammals. Five MCR members and two MRAPs
28
were also predicted in the chicken (Gallus gallus) genome. However, little is known
29
about their expression, regulation and biological functions. In this study, we cloned
30
the MRAP and MRAP2 genes. Sequencing analysis revealed that the functional
31
domains of MRAP and MRAP2 were conserved among species, suggesting that the
32
physiological roles of chicken MRAP and MRAP2 could be similar to their
33
mammalian counterparts. Tissue expression analysis demonstrated that MRAP was
34
expressed in the adrenal gland, liver, spleen, glandular stomach and lungs, while
35
MRAP2 is predominantly expressed in the adrenal gland. All five MCRs were present
36
in the adrenal gland, but showed different expression patterns in other tissues. The
37
MC5R was the only MCR member that was expressed in the chicken liver. The
38
expression levels of MRAP in chicken liver were significantly increased at sexual
39
maturity stage, and were significantly up-regulated (P < 0.05) when chickens and
40
chicken primary hepatocytes were treated with 17β-estradiol in vivo and in vitro,
41
respectively; however, expression levels of PPARγ were down-regulated, and no
42
effect on MC5R was observed. Our results suggested that estrogen could stimulate the
43
expression of MRAP in the liver of chicken through inhibiting the expression of
44
transcription regulation factor PPARγ, and MRAP might play its biological role in a
45
different way rather than forming an MRAP/MC2R complex in chicken liver during
46
the egg-laying period.
47 48 49
Keywords: Chicken; melanocortin receptors; melanocortin receptor accessory proteins; 17β-estradiol
50
1. Introduction
51
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play important roles in GPCR signal
52
transduction. Many accessory proteins interact with GPCRs to alter either the GPCRs’
53
ligand binding mechanism or their functional responses (Metherell et al., 2005; Rana,
54
2003). The melanocortin receptor (MCR) accessory proteins (MRAPs) are GPCR
55
accessory proteins that function in the melanocortin system. There are two subtypes
56
of MRAPs, MRAP and MRAP2, which have been identified in many species (Hinkle
57
and Sebag, 2009; Webb and Clark, 2010). Comprehensive evolutionary analysis of the
58
MRAP and MRAP2 homologs revealed that the two subtypes possibly originated from
59
a single ancestor (Valsalan et al., 2013).
60
Both MRAP and MRAP2 are small proteins containing a single transmembrane
61
domain with no signal peptide. The MRAP gene in humans has six exons and is
62
located on chromosome 21q22.1. Exons 3 to 5 encode the 172-amino acid MRAP
63
protein. Comparative protein sequence studies of MRAP found that the N-terminal
64
and transmembrane regions are highly conserved, while the C-terminal regions vary
65
greatly in length and show little sequence homology between species. However,
66
MRAP possesses only a small amount of overall conservation in gene structure or
67
protein sequence among species (Valsalan et al., 2013; Webb and Clark, 2010). The
68
human MRAP2 gene comprises four exons that encode a 205-amino acid protein.
69
Molecular modeling also predicted the presence of a transmembrane domain that is
70
fully conserved among MRAP2 sequences (Agulleiro et al., 2010). Similar to MRAP,
71
the C-terminal domain is not conserved. However, the IPNFV domain is fully
72
conserved in all MRAP2 sequences (Cerdá-Reverter et al., 2013). The MRAP and
73
MRAP2 often form highly unusual antiparallel homodimers, which bind directly with
74
the MCRs and form a stable immunoprecipitable complex, which is essential for
75
trafficking of MCRs from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane, where
76
they mediate their pharmacological effects (Metherell et al., 2005; Roy et al., 2007;
77
Sebag and Hinkle, 2007).
78
Five subtypes (MC1R, MC2R, MC3R, MC4R, and MC5R) have been identified
79
in the MCR family in many species, including chicken (Gallus gallus) (Cone et al.,
80
1993; Dores, 2013; Klovins et al., 2004; Ling et al., 2004; Mountjoy et al., 1992; Roy
81
et al., 2007), and they are distributed in various tissues (Cone, 2006; Davis et al., 2013;
82
Dores, 2013). All of the accumulated data suggested the co-expression and physical
83
interaction of MC2R with MRAP. MC2R,also referred to as the ACTH receptor, is
84
expressed primarily in the adrenal cortex and spleen (Cone et al., 1993; Mountjoy et
85
al., 1992). In the mammalian adrenal gland, MRAP facilitates MC2R expression and
86
trafficking from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane (Chung et al.,
87
2008). It also plays an essential and independent role in influencing the
88
three-dimensional conformation of MC2R, facilitating ACTH binding and activating
89
the MC2R/MRAP complex on the plasma membrane, leading to receptor signaling
90
(Hinkle and Sebag, 2009; Webb and Clark, 2010). MRAP is also expressed outside
91
the adrenal gland, this suggested that MRAP plays a wider physiological purpose
92
beyond MC2R-mediated adrenal steroidogenesis (Novoselova et al., 2013). The
93
MRAP2 is reported to be required for growth and development, as well as metabolism,
94
across species via melanocortin receptor signaling (Asai et al., 2013; Cone, 2006;
95
Sebag et al., 2013). It is predominantly expressed in the brain and interacts directly
96
with MC4R to enhance MC4R-mediated generation of the second messenger, cyclic
97
AMP (Asai et al., 2013). In zebrafish, MC1R physically interacts with the MRAP2
98
system; however, this interaction does not result in any modification of the studied
99
pharmacological profile (Cortés et al., 2014). More interestingly, MRAP2 can interact
100
with MC2R to aid MC2R trafficking to the membrane. However, data on functional
101
activation by ACTH are controversial (Agulleiro et al., 2010; Sebag and Hinkle,
102
2009). Both MRAP and MRAP2 reduce the expression level of MC4R and MC5R but
103
not of MC1R and MC3R in the plasma membrane. The MC5R homodimerizes in the
104
absence of MRAP, as does MC2R, but the co-expression of MRAP inhibits MC5R
105
homodimerization (Sebag and Hinkle, 2009).
106
It was reported that the transcriptional activation of MRAP gene was regulated by
107
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), which is one members of the
108
nuclear hormone receptor superfamily of transcription factors (Mangelsdorf et al.,
109
1995). Previous studies demonstrated that there were peroxisome proliferator
110
response element (PPRE) sites in the MRAP promoter, and PPARγ could bind to the
111
PPRE in the MRAP promoter to regulate the transcriptional activation of MRAP in
112
3T3-L1 cells (Kim et al., 2013). In addition, PPARγ can be negatively regulated by
113
estradiol treatment in human abdominal adipose tissue (Lundholm et al., 2008).
114
Both the MRAP and MRAP2 genes were identified in chicken genome. In
115
addition, there were two transcript variants of MRAP2 genes in the chicken genome,
116
MRAP2α and MRAP2β. The isoform in this study refers to MRAP2α. MRAP and
117
MRAP2 are located on chromosomes 1 and 3, and encode the deduced proteins of 120
118
and 206 amino acid residues, respectively. Five MCR family member genes were also
119
found in the chicken genome, among which MC1R and MC3R reside on chromosome
120
11 and 20, respectively, and MC2R, MC4R and MC5R reside on chromosome 2.
121
However, the expression patterns and regulatory mechanism of these genes are poorly
122
understood. To gain insights into the biological functions of these genes, we cloned
123
the MRAP and MRAP2, and investigated their tissue distribution and regulatory
124
mechanism. Our results demonstrated that MRAP was present not only in the adrenal
125
gland, but also in the liver, spleen, glandular stomach, lungs and brain, while MRAP2
126
is predominantly expressed in the adrenal gland and brain. All of the five MCRs were
127
present in the adrenal gland, but showed varied expression patterns in other tissues.
128
Only MC5R was present in the liver. Moreover, MRAP was significantly upregulated
129
by estradiol in chicken liver and primary hepatocytes, however MC5R expression
130
showed no changes. Our studies, for the first time, systematically investigated the
131
expression and regulation of melanocortin receptors and their accessory proteins in
132
chicken, and suggested that MRAP might play a role alone rather than forming the
133
MRAP/MC5R complex in the chicken liver during the egg-laying period.
134
2. Materials and methods
135
2.1 Animals, treatment and sampling
136
All experimental designs and procedures were performed in accordance with the
137
protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Henan
138
Agricultural University. All animals used in the experiments were female Lushi
139
Green-shell-egg chickens obtained from the Animal Center of Henan Agricultural
140
University. They were raised in the same environmental conditions with food and
141
water ad libitum.
142
To clone the MRAP, MRAP2 and related genes, and determine their expression
143
profiles, eight female birds at different ages were humanely killed. The heart, liver,
144
pectoral, kidney, adrenal gland, spleen, abdominal fat, duodenum, glandular stomach,
145
pancreas and lung were quickly removed, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at
146
−80°C in a freezer until use.
147
To investigate the effect of estradiol on the expression of MRAP, 40 birds at 10
148
weeks old were divided randomly into four groups of 10 birds. The birds in groups 1,
149
2 and 3 were injected intramuscularly with 0.5 mg, 2.0 mg and 8.0 mg of
150
17β-estradiol (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) (dissolved in olive oil)/kg of body weight,
151
respectively. The birds in group 4 served as the controls and were injected
152
intramuscularly with solvent olive oil only. All the birds were killed after treatment
153
for 12 hours. Their livers were collected and stored as mentioned above.
154
2.2 Primary hepatocyte culture and treatment
155
Hepatocytes were isolated from chicken embryonic livers according to the
156
method of Fischer and Marks (Fischer and Marks, 1976), with some modifications. In
157
brief, livers were removed from 18-day-old female embryonic chickens and washed
158
with D-Hanks solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The livers were manually minced,
159
washed with D-Hanks solution, and digested using collagenase type II with gentle
160
shaking at 37 °C for 0.5 hours. Dispersed cells were filtered through a 200-mesh sieve
161
and a 500-mesh sieve. After washing and centrifugation, unadulterated hepatocytes
162
were obtained using non-continuous density Percoll gradient centrifugation. Then the
163
cells were resuspended in DMEM medium (Sigma) supplemented with 5% fetal calf
164
serum, 100 mg/mL streptomycin and 100 U/mL penicillin, and counted using a Luna
165
automated cell counter (Biosystems L10001, Korea). The cell density was adjusted to
166
5×105 cells/mL. The cells with viability greater than 90%, as assessed using the
167
TrypanBlue exclusion assay, were plated on 6-well plates at 2 mL per well. Cells were
168
incubated at 38.5 °C under a water-saturated atmosphere containing 95% air humidity
169
and 5% CO2. When the cells reached 90% confluence (after approximately 24 hours),
170
the cell culture medium was replaced by serum-free DMEM medium with 100 mg/mL
171
streptomycin and 100 U/mL penicillin, and incubated for 12 hours.
172
To assess the effect of estradiol on expression of the MRAP gene in hepatocytes,
173
the cells were divided into four groups, with four repeats in each group, and treated
174
with 25 nM, 50 nM and 100 nM of 17β-estradiol, respectively. The control group
175
received solvent ethanol alone at a final concentration of 0.1%. After 12 hours, the
176
cells were washed with fresh D-Hanks solution, collected by the Trizol reagent
177
(Takara, Kyoto, Japan), and stored at −80°C until use.
178
2.3 RNA extraction and reverse transcription
179
Total RNA from primary hepatocytes and chicken tissues was extracted with
180
Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA,
181
USA). The quantity and quality of the RNA samples were assessed using a NanoDrop
182
2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) and standard
183
denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis. The RNA samples with OD260/280 ratios
184
above 1.8 were used for further study. One microgram of RNA from each sample was
185
treated with DNase I (Invitrogen #18068015) to remove trace amounts of DNA
186
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each of the RNA samples was treated
187
with DNase I (Invitrogen #18068015) to remove trace amounts of genomic DNA
188
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The treated RNA samples were checked
189
by PCR with primer pairs for amplification of internal control β-actin and GAPDH
190
genes (Table s1). Only the samples showed no amplification from RNA without
191
reverse transcription were used for the next study. One microgram of the DNase I
192
treated RNA was then reverse transcribed into cDNA using random hexamer primers
193
with the Thermo Scientific™ Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo
194
Scientific # K1621) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA was
195
stored at −20°C until use.
196
2.4 Gene cloning and sequencing analysis
197
According to the predicted chicken MRAP and MRAP2 sequences in GenBank
198
(accession numbers XR_001470382 and XM_015284715, respectively), two pairs of
199
specific PCR primers (Supplemental Table 1) for cloning the coding sequences (CDS)
200
of the genes were designed, using the software primer 5.0. The PCR was performed in
201
a 12.5-µL reaction volume containing 0.5 µL of first-strand cDNA, 6.25 µL of 2×PCR
202
Mix (Takara), 0.5 µL each of the forward and reverse primers (10 µM), and 4.75 µL
203
RNase-free water. The reactions were amplified using the following conditions: 95°C
204
for 5 minutes; 30 cycles at 95°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 30
205
seconds; followed by 72°C for 10 minutes. The PCR products were sequenced by
206
Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Each sequence was confirmed by
207
sequencing twice and on both strands.
208
Database searches were performed at NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/)
209
using BLASTn and BLASTx under default settings. Peptide translations were made
210
using SDSC Biology Workbench (http://workbench.sdsc.edu/). Signal peptide and
211
transmembrane helices analyses were performed using the Signal P Server 4.1 and
212
TMHMM Server v. 2.0 available at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/ and
213
http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/, respectively. N-linked glycosylation sites
214
were
215
http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/. Amino acid alignments were generated
216
using Clustal V in the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0 (MEGA
217
6).
218
2.5 Tissue distribution of MRAP, MRAP2 and MCR genes
predicted
using
NetNGlyc
1.0
servers
at
219
The expression profiles of MRAP, MRAP2 and MCR genes in the 11 tissues
220
including heart, liver, pectoral, kidney, adrenal gland, spleen, abdominal fat,
221
duodenum, glandular stomach, pancreas and lung were analyzed by RT-PCR. First,
222
the same amount of cDNA sample from each tissue of eight individuals was mixed.
223
The mixed cDNA sample was used to generate amplification products by PCR using
224
primer pairs for the MRAP, MRAP2 and MCR genes (Supplemental Table 1). To
225
confirm the effectiveness of reverse transcription, PCR was also carried out to
226
amplify a cDNA fragment of the chicken β-actin gene using the specific primer pair
227
shown in Supplemental Table 1. The PCR was carried out in a 12.5-µL reaction
228
volume with the same amplification conditions mentioned in section 2.4.
229
Amplification products were separated by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel and
230
stained with DNA Green (LaiFeng, HangZhou, China).
231
2.6 Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)
232
The expression levels of the genes were quantified using SYBR Green method in
233
a Roche Lightcycle R96 instrument according to the method of Nolan (Nolan et al.,
234
2006). The β-actin was used as the endogenous control. Each reaction contained 5 µl
235
of SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Takara), 3.5 µl of RNase-free water, 0.5 µl each of
236
forward and reverse primers (Supplemental Table 1) and 0.5 µl of extracted cDNA.
237
The reaction conditions were as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes; followed
238
by 40 PCR cycles at 95°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 20
239
seconds; followed by a further 10-minute extension at 72°C. All reactions were
240
performed in triplicate. The expression levels were measured in terms of the cycle
241
threshold (Ct), and then normalized by β-actin using the 2 -△△Ct method.
242
2.7 Western blotting analysis
243
Total protein was extracted from liver tissue using the RIPA lysis buffer (R00zO,
244
Solarbio, China). The protein concentration was determined using a Bradford assay
245
(Bradford, 1976). A total of 50 µg protein from each sample was separated on 12%
246
SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Separated protein was then transferred to polyvinylidene
247
difluoride (PVDF) membranes (IPVH00010, Millipore, USA) and membranes were
248
then blocked with nonfat milk for 1 hour. Then the membranes were washed with
249
PBST three times and incubated with the MRAP primary antibodies (MRAP BK-730,
250
Broad-ocean Bio-science, China) at 4°C for overnight. The membranes were then
251
washed three times using PBST, and incubated with secondary antibody conjugated
252
with HRP (ZB-2305, ZSGB-BIO, China) for one hour at room temperature. Images
253
were captured and analyzed by UVP GDS-8000 System (Thermo Scientific). β-actin
254
was used as an internal control.
255
2.8 Statistical analysis
256
Statistical analyses of the qPCR results were carried out using SPSS version 20.0.
257
One-way ANOVA and repeated measures ANOVA were used for statistical analysis of
258
relative expression levels, followed by Dunnett’s test. Graphics were drawn using
259
Graphpad Prism 5 (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), and differences were
260
considered significant at P ≤ 0.05. Data was presented as the mean ± SD.
261
3. Results
262
3.1 Cloning and sequence analysis of chicken MRAP and MRAP2
263
The full-length coding sequences for the chicken MRAP and MRAP2 were
264
obtained by PCR amplification using chicken adrenal gland cDNA as the template.
265
Sequencing analysis indicated that the coding sequences of MRAP and MRAP2 were
266
entirely identical to the predicted coding sequences of the two genes in GenBank
267
(accession number XR_001470382 and XM_015284715, respectively). The chicken
268
MRAP gene comprised of three exons and encoded a 120-amino acid MRAP protein
269
(Fig. 1A). The cDNA sequences and deduced amino acid sequences are shown in
270
Fig.1B. Bioinformatics analyses results revealed that there was no signal peptide but a
271
possible transmembrane domain from amino acid 38 to 60 in the MRAP protein
272
sequence with N-terminus inside the cell and C-terminus outside (Supplemental Fig.
273
l). In addition, there were two potential N-linked glycosylation (Asn-X-Ser/Thr) sites
274
at positions 3 and 6 in the N-terminal intracellular domain and one at amino acid 91 in
275
the extracellular domain. The MRAP2 gene of chicken also comprised of three exons
276
and encoded a 206- amino acid MRAP2α protein (Fig. 2A). The cDNA sequences and
277
deduced amino acid sequences are shown in Fig. 2B. Similar to MRAP, MRAP2 had
278
no signal peptide but a possible transmembrane domain between amino acid 45 and
279
67 (Supplemental Fig.2).
280
Multiple alignments of MRAP and MRAP2 amino acid sequences among
281
different species including chicken and 10 other species from mammal, avian,reptile,
282
batrachians, and fish are obtained by Clustal V (Fig. 3A and Fig. 3B). Amino acid
283
sequence alignment analysis among species manifested that chicken MRAP and
284
MRAP2 shared low identifies with other species. The most conserved parts were in
285
the N-terminus and transmembrane regions. Amino acid sequence alignment analysis
286
between chicken MRAP and MRAP2 indicated that MRAP was only 16.02% identical
287
to MRAP2 (Fig. 3C). The most conserved parts were in the N-terminal and
288
transmembrane regions. The N-terminal were 41.67% identical. The molecular
289
evolution and the relationships between the homologs were investigated using
290
phylogenetic methods. The evolution analysis result showed that the phylogeny tree
291
was divided into two phylogenetic groups by MRAP and MRAP2 (Fig. 4). The avian
292
MRAP and MRAP2 clusters separate from mammalian and reptile MRAP and
293
MRAP2.
294
3.2 Tissue distribution of MRAP, MRAP2 and MCRs
295
To detect the tissue specific expression patterns of MRAP, MRAP2 and MCRs
296
mRNA in chicken, tissues including heart, liver, pectoralis, kidney, adrenal, spleen,
297
abdominal fat, duodenum, glandular stomach, pancreas lungs and hypothalamus were
298
studied using semi-quantitative PCR in 30-week-old laying chickens (Fig. 5). MRAP2
299
can be detected in the adrenal gland and brain tissues, and MC2R only can be detected
300
in the adrenal gland. Only MRAP and MC5R can be detected in the liver tissue of
301
chicken. Other genes were extensively expressed in multiple tissues.
302
3.3 Differential expression of MRAP, MC5R and PPARγ in the liver at the different
303
developmental stages of chicken
304
To further understand the biological functions of MRAP in the chicken liver, the
305
mRNA expression levels of MRAP, MC5R and PPARγ in the liver during the different
306
developmental stages of chicken were studied using qPCR. In addition, the protein
307
levels of MRAP were also detected by Western Blotting. The relative expression
308
levels of MRAP mRNA (Fig. 6A) and protein (Fig. 6B) in 30-week-old chickens were
309
significantly higher than those in 10- and 20-week-old (P<0.01). The relative
310
expression levels of PPARγ mRNA were significantly lower (P<0.01), while MC5R
311
mRNA was not changed (Fig. 6C).
312
3.4 Effect of 17β-estradiol on MRAP, MC5R and PPARγ expression in vitro and in
313
vivo
314
To sight into the effect of 17β-estradiol on the expression of MRAP, MC5R and
315
PPARγin vivo, the mRNA expression levels of the three genes were investigated in the
316
livers of chickens treated with 17β-estradiol. Meantime, the protein levels of MRAP
317
were also analyzed by Western Blotting. The results showed that the expression levels
318
of MRAP mRNA (Fig. 7A) and protein (Fig. 7B) (P<0.05) were significantly
319
increased in the livers of 17β-estradiol treated chickens. By contrast, the PPARγ
320
mRNA expression levels were significantly decreased by varying degrees after the
321
chickens treated with different doses of 17β-estradiol for 12 hours. No alteration was
322
observed to the expression levels of MC5R mRNA when chickens treated with
323
17β-estradiol (Fig. 7C).
324
To further verify whether the expressions of MRAP, MC5R and PPARγ genes
325
were regulated by sex steroids in vitro, chicken primary hepatocytes were treated with
326
different concentrations of 17β-estradiol. The results showed that the expression level
327
of MRAP mRNA presented a dose dependent increase, and the PPARγ appeared a
328
corresponding decrease; the MC5R mRNA expression level was unaffected by
329
17β-estradiol (Fig. 8).
330
4. DISCUSSION
331
In this study, we cloned the whole coding sequences of MRAP and MRAP2 in
332
chicken for the first time. Sequence analysis indicated that chicken MRAP is a small
333
protein of 120 amino acids with no signal peptide, which has a tyrosine-rich domain
334
in the N-terminal region. The chicken MRAP shares relatively low amino acid
335
sequence identities with MRAPs of mammalian species (approximately 40% identity).
336
Three functionally distinct domains of MRAP are highly conserved in chickens (Fig.
337
3A) (Webb and Clark, 2010). These observations suggested that the physiological
338
roles of chicken MRAP might be similar to its mammalian counterparts. The chicken
339
MRAP2 shared relatively low amino acid sequence identities with chicken MRAP and
340
other mammalian MRAP2s. The functional domains of MRAP2 are varied (Agulleiro
341
et al., 2010; Cerdá-Reverter et al., 2013); therefore, its biological functions need to be
342
explored further.
343
The importance of MRAP for the functional expression of the MC2R/ACTH
344
receptor and MRAP/MC2R for physiological function of adrenal gland has been
345
extensively studied since MCRs and MRAP were first discovered and cloned about 25
346
years and 40 years ago, respectively (Mountjoy et al., 1992; Schwyzer, 1977). It has
347
been well documented that MRAP interacts with MC2R and trafficking MC2R from
348
the endoplasmic reticulum to the cell surface. However, there are still some confusing
349
facets of the system. One study reported that MC2R was expressed on cell surface in
350
the absence of MRAP (Roy et al., 2007). Very recently, the MC2R orthologs of the
351
stingray, Dasyatis akajei, and the elephant shark, Callorhinchus milii, were reported
352
also functionally expressed in CHO cells in the absence of co-transfection of an
353
exogenous MRAP cDNA (Dores, 2016; Reinick et al., 2012). In addition, studies
354
showed that human MRAP was expressed in a wide range of tissues including the
355
hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, and spinal cord, among other tissues
356
(Gardiner et al., 2002), but MC2R was only detectable in the adrenal, bone, adipose
357
tissue, ovaries, testes, skin, and the pituitary (Metherell et al., 2005). MRAP
358
expression clearly extends beyond MC2R expression (Jackson et al., 2015). Up to
359
now, the observation of MRAP expression outside the adrenal gland suggested a
360
special physiological purpose
361
steroidogenesis. However, few studies looked into the functional roles of MRAP in
362
the absence of MC2R.
beyond
MC2R
or
MC5R-mediated
adrenal
363
Our results showed that the MRAP and MC5R were expressed in the adrenal
364
gland and liver; however, MC2R was only detected in the adrenal gland in chickens. A
365
previous study reported that MC2R was found in the adrenal gland and spleen in
366
chicken (Takeuchi et al., 1998). The possible reason that made the difference might be
367
due to the chickens used for the studies were in the different developmental stages.
368
With the absence of MC2R in chicken liver and other tissues, the question arises as to
369
whether any other MCR family members, instead of MC2R, interact with MRAP in
370
the chicken liver or whether MRAP is involved in other biological processes besides
371
the above-mentioned functions. Previous studies in mammals have showed that
372
MRAPs have no effect on the trafficking of MC1R and MC3R but reduce surface
373
expression of MC4R and MC5R (Chan et al., 2009; Sebag and Hinkle, 2009). Another
374
study has also shown a significant reduction in MC5R signaling in the presence of
375
MRAPs (Sebag and Hinkle, 2010). However, our data showed that expression of
376
MRAP was up-regulated, but MC5R maintained no change when the individuals and
377
hepatocytes were treated by estradiol. The different mechanism might be in part due
378
to differences in species, cell-lines, tissue or be dependent on the ortholog studied.
379
Hence, there is still a considerable amount of work need to be done to clarify the
380
physiological roles of the MRAP.
381
The significant physiological difference between hens at 20 weeks and those at
382
30 weeks lies in their sexual maturity and egg laying. Estrogen is vitally important for
383
sexual maturity and the development of the female reproductive system (Hess et al.,
384
2011; Sato et al., 1996). The plasma estrogen in female chicken reaches peak level
385
just before the onset of the first egg production (Tanabe et al., 1981; Williams and
386
Harvey, 1986), then goes down gradually, but still maintains with a relative higher
387
level than that in the immature pullets for certain period (Williams and Harvey, 1986).
388
Moreover, for chicken, the liver is one of the main target organs for estrogen.
389
Estrogens initiate the transcription of estrogen-dependent genes and enhance the
390
stability of their transcripts (Flouriot et al., 1996). The MRAP was up-regulated by
391
estrogen, which suggested that estrogen might be served as an activator of MRAP.
392
Nuclear hormone receptors are ligand-activated transcription factors that regulate
393
gene expression by interacting with specific DNA sequences in the upstream region
394
(promoter) of their target genes. Through sequence analysis, PPREs was found in the
395
chicken MRAP promoter region. PPARγ, a key regulator of adipogenesis, is involved
396
in the regulation of lipid metabolism (Luquet et al., 2004; Watanabe et al., 2003). It
397
has been reported to increase the expression of certain genes involved in adipogenesis,
398
for instance the genes encoding stearoyl–CoA desaturase-1 (SCD-1) (Ikeda et al.,
399
2015), disulfide-bond A oxidoreductase-like protein (DsbA-L) (Jin et al., 2015),
400
insulin-dependent glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) (Wu et al., 1998), adipocyte fatty
401
acid binding protein (aP2)(Tontonoz et al., 1994), lipoprotein lipase (LPL)
402
(Schoonjans et al., 1996) and the fatty acid translocase (CD-36/FAT) (Sato and Akiba,
403
2002). In addition, PPARγ can be negatively regulated by estradiol treatment in human
404
abdominal adipose tissue (Lundholm et al., 2008). Previous study demonstrated that
405
PPARγ could bind to the transcriptional regulation factor PPRE of MRAP to regulate
406
the transcriptional activation of MRAP in 3T3-L1 cells (Kim et al., 2013). As our in
407
vitro and in vivo experiments indicated, estradiol exhibited an inhibition role on the
408
expression of PPARγ, which likely in turn relieves the transcriptional suppression role
409
to MRAP, leading to the increase of MRAP expression in mRNA and protein level.
410
In summary, given the above findings, it was implied that estradiol might
411
contribute to the expression of MRAP through inhibiting the expression of
412
transcription regulation factor PPARγ in chicken liver. MRAP might play its
413
biological role in a different way rather than forming an MRAP/MC2R complex
414
under estradiol induction in chicken. However, further studies need to be carried out
415
to confirm the functions of MRAP in chicken liver.
416 417
Figure legends
418
Fig. 1 Cloning and sequence analysis of chicken MRAP. (A) The gene structure
419
of chicken MRAP. Exons are indicated by boxes. The gray regions of boxes represent
420
the coding sequence, and the white regions represent the regions that were cut off in
421
the transcribed mRNA. The introns are regions within the broken lines which
422
indicated the cut off in the mRNA. (B) cDNA and deduced amino acid sequence for
423
chicken MRAP. Nucleotides are shown in lower case letters and amino acids in capital
424
letters above the first nucleotide in each codon triplet. The predicted start (atg) and
425
stop (tga) codons, are shown in bold text with underlining. Predicted glycosylated
426
amino acids (N) are indicated by gray shading. The predicted transmembrane is
427
shown as black boxes with white text. The numbers on left hand side indicated the
428
number of nucleotides counting continuously from the first one.
429 430
Fig. 2 Cloning and sequence analysis of chicken MRAP2. Descriptions for Fig. 2A and 2B are the same as described in Fig. 1A and 1B, respectively.
431
Fig. 3 Multiple alignments of MRAP and MRAP2 amino acid sequences among
432
different species by Clustal V. 50%-70% percentage identity sites are indicated by
433
gray shading and more than 70% percentage identity sites are indicated by black
434
shading. (A) Multiple alignment of MRAP amino acid sequences. The amino acid
435
sequences name and NCBI accession numbers used in the multiple alignment were as
436
follows: hs MRAPα, Homo sapiens (human), NM_178817.3; hs MRAPβ, Homo
437
sapiens
438
NM_001285394.1; mm MRAP, Mus musculus (house mouse), NM_029844.3; gg
439
MRAP, Gallus gallus (chicken), XR_001470382.1 ; mg MRAP, Meleagris gallopavo
(human),
NM_206898.1;
hs
MRAPγ,
Homo
sapiens
(human),
440
(turkey), XM_003202927.2; mu MRAP, Melopsittacus undulates (budgerigar),
441
XM_005151786.1; ap MRAP, Anas platyrhynchos (mallard), XM_005013839.2; cp
442
MRAP, Chrysemys picta (painted turtle), XM_005283913.1; ps MRAP, Pelodiscus
443
sinensis (Chinese soft-shelled turtle), XM_006126058.1; xt MRAP, Xenopus
444
(Silurana) tropicalis (western clawed frog), XM_002938443.3; dr MRAP, Danio rerio
445
(zebrafish), Ensembl version: ENSDART00000148193.2. The position of ligand
446
binding domain (1), antiparallel dimerization domain (2), and the transmembrane
447
domain (3) are shown by black lines. (B) Multiple alignment of MRAP2 amino acid
448
sequences. The amino acid sequence names were described as above, the NCBI
449
accession numbers were as follows: hs MRAP2, NM_138409.2; mm MRAP2,
450
NM_001101482.2; gg MRAP2α, NM_001320907.1; gg MRAP2β, XM_015284715.1;
451
mg MRAP2, XM_010707659.1; mu MRAP2, XM_005153140.1; ap MRAP2,
452
XM_013093506.1; ps MRAP2α, XM_006133346.2; ps MRAP2β, XM_006133347.2;
453
xt MRAP2, XM_002933917.2; dr MRAP2, XM_001342887.5. (C) Amino acid
454
sequences alignment of chicken MRAP and MRAP2α. The asterisk represents the
455
same amino acid.
456
Fig. 4 Phylogenetic relationship between representative MRAP and MRAP2
457
homologs. The amino acid sequence alignments were conducted using Clustal V
458
based on a BLOSUM protein weight matrix. The bootstrap consensus tree was
459
inferred from 1000 replicates. The evolutionary distances were computed using the
460
Poisson correction method. The fragmented sequences were removed for obtaining a
461
stable topology. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6. Branch lengths
462
reflect evolutionary divergence.
463
Fig. 5 Tissue distribution of chicken MRAP, MRAP2 and MCRs mRNAs using
464
RT-PCR. Distribution is shown of amplification products separated by electrophoresis
465
on a 2% agarose gel.
466
Fig. 6 Expression patterns of MRAP, MC5R and PPARγ in liver in different
467
developmental stages. (A) The MRAP mRNA levels were normalized to the mRNA
468
levels of β-actin. (B) Bottom: Western blotting of MRAP using equal amounts of
469
protein extracted from livers of chickens with different ages. Top: Corresponding
470
MRAP densitometry values were normalized to β-actin, respectively. (C) The MC5R
471
and PPARγ mRNA levels were normalized to the mRNA levels of β-actin. Graphed
472
data represent the mean ± SD, n = 6. Values with different superscripts indicate
473
statistical difference (p<0.05).
474
Fig. 7 Effects of 17β-Estradiol on the expression of MRAP, MC5R and PPARγ in
475
chicken liver. (A) The MRAP mRNA levels of the genes were normalized to the
476
mRNA levels of β-actin. (B) Bottom: Western blotting of MRAP using equal amounts
477
of protein extracted from livers treated with increasing concentrations of 17β-estradiol.
478
Top: Corresponding MRAP densitometry values were normalized to β-actin,
479
respectively. (C) The MC5R and PPARγ mRNA levels were normalized to the mRNA
480
levels of β-actin. Graphed data represent the mean ± SD, n = 6. Values with
481
different superscripts indicate statistical difference (p<0.05).
482
Fig. 8 Effects of 17β-Estradiol on the expression of MRAP, MC5R and PPARγ in
483
primary hepatocytes. The mRNA levels of the genes were normalized to the mRNA
484
levels of β-actin. Each data point represents the mean ± SD, n = 6. Values with
485
different superscripts indicate statistical difference (P<0.05).
486 487
Supporting Information
488
Supplemental Table.1 List of PCR and real-time PCR primers used. All primers were
489
designed by primer 5.0 and synthases by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Products
490
have been sequenced and alignment with the reference sequence.
491
Supplemental Fig.1 The output of MRAP transmembrane domain performed by
492
TMHMM Server v. 2.0.
493
Supplemental Fig.2 The output of MRAP2 transmembrane domain performed by
494
TMHMM Server v. 2.0.
495
Author contributions
496
RJ and LY performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. LH, XN and LC
497
participated in the management of the experimental animals and the sample collection.
498
WY and LZ contributed to the cell culture and qRT-PCR analyses. KX and HR
499
participated in critical discussion. TY and LX conceived the study, participated in the
500
experiment design and critical discussion. All authors read and approved the final
501
manuscript.
502
Disclosure statement
503 504
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Acknowledgments
505
This work was supported by the Henan International Cooperative Research
506
Project (162102410030), Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-Industry Technology
507
Research System (CARS-41-K04), Key Science and Technology Research Project of
508
Henan Province (112101110800).
509
References
510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538
Agulleiro, M.J., Roy, S., Sánchez, E., Puchol, S., Gallo-Payet, N., Cerdá-Reverter, J.M., 2010. Role of melanocortin receptor accessory proteins in the function of zebrafish melanocortin receptor type 2. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 320, 145-152. Asai, M., Ramachandrappa, S., Joachim, M., Shen, Y., Zhang, R., Nuthalapati, N., Ramanathan, V., Strochlic, D.E., Ferket, P., Linhart, K., 2013. Loss of function of the melanocortin 2 receptor accessory protein 2 is associated with mammalian obesity. Science. 341, 275-278. Bradford, M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254. Cerdá-Reverter, J.M., Agulleiro, M., Cortés, R., Sánchez, E., Guillot, R., Leal, E., Fernández-Durán, B., Puchol, S., Eley, M., 2013. Involvement of melanocortin receptor accessory proteins (MRAPs) in the function of melanocortin receptors. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 188, 133-136. Chan, L.F., Webb, T.R., Chung, T.-T., Meimaridou, E., Cooray, S.N., Guasti, L., Chapple, J.P., Egertová, M., Elphick, M.R., Cheetham, M.E., 2009. MRAP and MRAP2 are bidirectional regulators of the melanocortin receptor family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 6146-6151. Chung, T., Webb, T., Lf, Cooray, S., Metherell, L., King, P., Chapple, J., Clark, A., 2008. The majority of adrenocorticotropin receptor (melanocortin 2 receptor) mutations found in familial glucocorticoid deficiency type 1 lead to defective trafficking of the receptor to the cell surface. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 93, 4948-4954. Cone, R.D., 2006. Studies on the physiological functions of the melanocortin system. Endocr. Rev. 27:736-749. Cone, R.D., Mountjoy, K.G., Robbins, L.S., Nadeau, J.H., Johnson, K.R., ROSELLI‐REHFUSS, L., Mortrud, M.T., 1993. Cloning and functional characterization of a family of receptors for the melanotropic peptides. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 680, 342-363. Cortés, R., Agulleiro, M.J., Navarro, S., Guillot, R., Sánchez, E., Cerdá-Reverter, J.M., 2014. Melanocortin receptor accessory protein 2 (MRAP2) interplays with the zebrafish melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) but has no effect on its pharmacological profile. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 201, 30-36. Davis, P., Franquemont, S., Liang, L., Angleson, J.K., Dores, R.M., 2013. Evolution of the melanocortin-2 receptor in tetrapods: Studies on Xenopus tropicalis MC2R and Anolis carolinensis MC2R. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 188, 75-84.
539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582
Dores, R.M., 2013. Observations on the evolution of the melanocortin receptor gene family: distinctive features of the melanocortin-2 receptor. Front. Neurosci. 7, 28. Dores, R.M., 2016. Hypothesis and Theory: Revisiting Views on the Co-evolution of the Melanocortin Receptors and the Accessory Proteins, MRAP1 and MRAP2. Front. Endocrinol. 7, 79. Fischer, P.W., Marks, G., 1976. Chick embryo liver cells maintained in serum-free Waymouth MD 705/1 medium. Methods Cell Sci. 2, 449-452. Flouriot, G., Pakdel, F., Valotaire, Y., 1996. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of rainbow trout estrogen receptor and vitellogenin gene expression. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 124, 173-183. Gardiner, K., Slavov, D., Bechtel, L., Davisson, M., 2002. Annotation of Human Chromosome 21 for Relevance to Down Syndrome: Gene Structure and Expression Analysis. Genomics. 79, 833-843. Hess, R.A., Fernandes, S.A., Gomes, G.R., Oliveira, C.A., Lazari, M.F., Porto, C.S., 2011. Estrogen and its receptors in efferent ductules and epididymis. J. Androl. 32, 600-613. Hinkle, P.M., Sebag, J.A., 2009. Structure and function of the melanocortin2 receptor accessory protein (MRAP). Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 300, 25-31. Ikeda, J., Ichiki, T., Takahara, Y., Kojima, H., Sankoda, C., Kitamoto, S., Tokunou, T., Sunagawa, K., 2015. PPARγ Agonists Attenuate Palmitate-Induced ER Stress through Up-Regulation of SCD-1 in Macrophages. PloS one, 10, e0128546. Jackson, D.S., Ramachandrappa, S., Clark, A.J., Chan, L.F., 2015. Melanocortin receptor accessory proteins in adrenal disease and obesity. Front. Neurosci. 9, 213. Jin, D., Sun, J., Huang, J., Yu, X., Yu, A., He, Y., Li, Q., Yang, Z., 2015. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ enhances adiponectin secretion via up-regulating DsbA-L expression. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 411:97-104. Kim, N.S., Kim, Y.-J., Cho, S.Y., Lee, T.R., Kim, S.H., 2013. Transcriptional activation of melanocortin 2 receptor accessory protein by PPARγ in adipocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 439, 401-406. Klovins, J., Haitina, T., Fridmanis, D., Kilianova, Z., Kapa, I., Fredriksson, R., Gallo-Payet, N., Schiöth, H.B., 2004. The melanocortin system in Fugu: determination of POMC/AGRP/MCR gene repertoire and synteny, as well as pharmacology and anatomical distribution of the MCRs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 563-579. Ling, M.K., Hotta, E., Kilianova, Z., Haitina, T., Ringholm, A., Johansson, L., Gallo‐Payet, N., Takeuchi, S., Schiöth, H.B., 2004. The melanocortin receptor subtypes in chicken have high preference to ACTH‐derived peptides. Br. J. Pharmacol. 143, 626-637. Lundholm, L., Zang, H., Hirschberg, A.L., Gustafsson, J.-Å., Arner, P., Dahlman-Wright, K., 2008. Key lipogenic gene expression can be decreased by estrogen in human adipose tissue. Fertil. Steril. 90, 44-48. Luquet, S., Lopez-Soriano, J., Holst, D., Gaudel, C., Jehl-Pietri, C., Fredenrich, A., Grimaldi, P.A., 2004. Roles of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARδ) in the control of fatty acid catabolism. A new target for the treatment of metabolic syndrome. Biochimie. 86, 833-837. Mangelsdorf, D.J., Thummel, C., Beato, M., Herrlich, P., Schütz, G., Umesono, K., Blumberg, B., Kastner, P., Mark, M., Chambon, P., 1995. The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell. 83, 835-839. Metherell, L.A., Chapple, J.P., Cooray, S., David, A., Becker, C., Rüschendorf, F., Naville, D., Begeot, M., Khoo, B., Nürnberg, P., 2005. Mutations in MRAP, encoding a new interacting partner of the ACTH receptor, cause familial glucocorticoid deficiency type 2. Nat. Genet. 37, 166-170. Mountjoy, K.G., Robbins, L.S., Mortrud, M.T., Cone, R.D., 1992. The cloning of a family of genes that
583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626
encode the melanocortin receptors. Science. 257, 1248-1251. Nolan, T., Hands, R.E., Bustin, S.A., 2006. Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Nat Protoc 2006. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1559-1582. Novoselova, T.V., Jackson, D., Campbell, D.C., Clark, A.J., Chan, L.F., 2013. Melanocortin receptor accessory proteins in adrenal gland physiology and beyond. J. Endocrinol. 217, R1-R11. Rana, B.K., 2003. New insights into G-protein-coupled receptor signaling from the melanocortin receptor system. Mol. Pharmacol. 64, 1-4. Reinick, C.L., Liang, L., Angleson, J.K., Dores, R.M., 2012. Identification of an MRAP-independent melanocortin-2 receptor: functional expression of the cartilaginous fish, Callorhinchus milii, melanocortin-2 receptor in CHO cells. Endocrinology. 153, 4757-4765. Roy, S., Rached, M., Gallo-Payet, N., 2007. Differential regulation of the human adrenocorticotropin receptor [melanocortin-2 receptor (MC2R)] by human MC2R accessory protein isoforms α and β in isogenic human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 21, 1656-1669. Sato, K., Akiba, Y., 2002. Lipoprotein lipase mRNA expression in abdominal adipose tissue is little modified by age and nutritional state in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 81, 846-852. Sato, M., Rippy, M.K., Bryant, H.U., 1996. Raloxifene, tamoxifen, nafoxidine, or estrogen effects on reproductive and nonreproductive tissues in ovariectomized rats. FASEB. J. 10, 905-912. Schoonjans, K., Staels, B., Auwerx, J., 1996. Role of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) in mediating the effects of fibrates and fatty acids on gene expression. J. Lipid Res. 37, 907-925. Schwyzer, R., 1977. ACTH: A SHORT INTRODUCTORY REVIEW *. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 297, 3-26. Sebag, J.A., Hinkle, P.M., 2007. Melanocortin-2 receptor accessory protein MRAP forms antiparallel homodimers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 20244-20249. Sebag, J.A., Hinkle, P.M., 2009. Regions of melanocortin 2 (MC2) receptor accessory protein necessary for dual topology and MC2 receptor trafficking and signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 610-618. Sebag, J.A., Hinkle, P.M., 2010. Regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling: specific dominant-negative effects of melanocortin 2 receptor accessory protein 2. Sci. Signal. 3, 1299-1311. Sebag, J.A., Zhang, C., Hinkle, P.M., Bradshaw, A.M., Cone, R.D., 2013. Developmental control of the melanocortin-4 receptor by MRAP2 proteins in zebrafish. Science. 341, 278-281. Takeuchi, S., Kudo, T., Takahashi, S., 1998. Molecular cloning of the chicken melanocortin 2 (ACTH)-receptor gene. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1403, 102-108. Tanabe, Y., Nakamura, T., Tanase, H., Doi, O., 1981. Comparisons of plasma LH, progesterone, testosterone and estradiol concentrations in male and female chickens (Gallus domesticus) from 28 to 1141 days of age. Endocrinol. Jpn. 28, 605-613. Tontonoz, P., Hu, E., Graves, R.A., Budavari, A.I., Spiegelman, B.M., 1994. mPPAR gamma 2: tissue-specific regulator of an adipocyte enhancer. Genes. Dev. 8, 1224-1234. Valsalan, R., Krishnan, A., Almén, M.S., Fredriksson, R., Schiöth, H.B., 2013. Early vertebrate origin of melanocortin 2 receptor accessory proteins (MRAPs). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 188, 123-132. Watanabe, M., Inukai, K., Katagiri, H., Awata, T., Oka, Y., Katayama, S., 2003. Regulation of PPARγ transcriptional activity in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 300, 429-436. Webb, T.R., Clark, A.J., 2010. Minireview: the melanocortin 2 receptor accessory proteins. Mol. Endocrinol. 24, 475-484. Williams, J., Harvey, S., 1986. Plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone growth hormone,
627 628 629 630 631 632
oestradiol, testosterone and androstenedione in the domestic hen from 6 weeks of age to sexual maturity. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 26, 515-522. Wu, Z., Xie, Y., Morrison, R.F., Bucher, N., Farmer, S.R., 1998. PPARgamma induces the insulin-dependent glucose transporter GLUT4 in the absence of C/EBPalpha during the conversion of 3T3 fibroblasts into adipocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 101, 22.
Primers name
Gene
Primer sequence (5'-3')
Accession
location
number
(5'-3') F:
MRAP
Primer
R:
oduct size
426-445
XR_00147038 CTCAGCAGTCCATTCCCAGA 2.1
Pr
636-617
211
GTCAGGTTTGGTCTTCGCTG F: MRAP2
24-43
NM_00132090 TAACAGAACCTCCCAGCAGG 7.1
R:
217-198
194
GTGCTCCTGTCTTTGTCAGC F: MC1R
273-292
NM_00103146 CAAGACGCTCTTCATGCTGC 2.1
R:
398-379
126
AGGAAGGAGAGGGAGGACAC F: MC2R
812-831
NM_00103151 ACTGTGCCTGCTACATGTCC 5.1
R:
915-896
104
CCGTAATTCTGGGCTTCGGA F: RT-PCR primer
MC3R
XM_00494723 CCGTTCCACCGTTCACCTAA 6.2
R: CTTACTGCTGGCTGTTGGGA F:
MC4R
3322-334 1 3482-346 3 475-494
NM_00103151 ATCATGACGGTCAAGCGTGT 4.1
R:
161
774-755
300
GGCCCAGCACACAACAAAAA F: MC5R
691-710
NM_00103101 AGAACCAGCATGAAGGGAGC 5.1
R:
959-940
269
CCACAGACCATTCTCACGCT F:GAACATCATCCCAGCGTC GAPDH
NM_204305.1
663-682
CA R:
795-776
133
ACGGCAGGTCAGGTCAACAA F: β-actin
NM_205518.1
415-434
GAGAGAAGATGACACAGATC R:
530-511
116
GTCCATCACAATACCAGTGG q-PCR primer
MRAP
XR_00147038 2.1
F:
426-445
CTCAGCAGTCCATTCCCAGA R:
211 636-617
GTCAGGTTTGGTCTTCGCTG F: MC5R
66-85
NM_00103101 TGTGCCTACTGTCAAGAGCA 5.1
R:
276-257
211
CTCCCAAGCATTAGACACGC F: β-actin
NM_205518.1
GAGAGAAGATGACACAGATC R: GTCCATCACAATACCAGTGG
633 634
415-434
530-511
116
Fig. 1A
Fig. 1B
Fig. 2A
Fig. 2B
Fig. 3A
Fig. 3B
Fig. 3C
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6A
Fig. 6B
Fig. 6C
Fig. 7A
Fig. 7B
Fig. 7C
Fig. 8
635 636 637
Highlights
638
MRAP and MRAP2 were conserved between species.
639
MRAP and MCRs were expressed in adrenal gland, and also in other tissues in
640
chicken.
641
Only MRAP and MC5R expressed in chicken liver.
642
The expression of MRAP was regulated by estrogen in vivo and in vitro.
643
MRAP might play its biological role in a different way rather than forming an
644
MRAP/MC2R complex
645 646