Biochemical changes in Bifidobacterium bifidum var. Pennsylvanicus after cell wall inhibition IV. Galactolipid composition

Biochemical changes in Bifidobacterium bifidum var. Pennsylvanicus after cell wall inhibition IV. Galactolipid composition

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA BIOCHEMICAL ACTA CHANGES PENNSYLVANICUS IV. GALACTOLIPID 545 IN BIFIDOBACTERI~JM AFTER CELL WALL BIFiTDTJM VAR. ...

449KB Sizes 0 Downloads 37 Views

BIOCHIMICA

ET BIOPHYSICA

BIOCHEMICAL

ACTA

CHANGES

PENNSYLVANICUS IV. GALACTOLIPID

545

IN BIFIDOBACTERI~JM

AFTER

CELL

WALL

BIFiTDTJM

VAR.

INHIBITION

COMPOSITION

SUMMARY

A decrease of the lipid galactose content of cells and membranes was observed after growth of ~~~~~~cte~~~~ b~~~~~ var. ~~~~sy~v~~~c~swithout human milk. This change resulted both from a decrease of the amount of all glycolipid compounds and from a shift in the ratio of these compounds to the monog~aciosyl Iipids at the expense of the digalactosyl lipids. The shift was stronger after shortening of the lag phase of the cells. The alterations could be explained by a more limited disposal of UDPgalactose for glycolipid synthesis as a consequence of an increased cell wall polysaccharide synthesis.

INTRODUCTION

In a previous paper* we reported a considerable decrease of the galactose content in lipid extracts of whole cells, membrane and cytoplasmic preparations of Si$~~~~c~ey~~~~i~~~~~ var. ~en~s~~va~~cu~after inhibition of cell wall synthesis. Inhibition was effected by depriving the cells of human milk, which contains N-acetylglucosamine derivatives necessary for normal growth and cell wall mucopeptide synthesis2-4. Preliminary results suggested that the decrease in lipid galactose was correlated with an overall decrease of the galactolipids, which were identified as mono-, di-, and trigalactosyldiglyceride, mono-, and diacyl monogalactosyldiglyceride and acyl digalactosyldiglyceride l, In this paper we report the changes occurring in the galactolipid content and in the galactolipid composition after cell wall inhibition. MATERIALS

AND METHODS

Cells were inoculated at 23” and 37” and grown for 16 or 40 h with or without human milk’. The cells were harvested and washed as describedl. Membrane preparaBiochina.Biophys. A&z, 231

(197’)

545-549

tionswere obtained as before’~. Lipids were extracted and fractionated on si!icic acid columns according to described procedures;. Galactoiipids vvere present in the acetone column

fraction.

was established

Their

identification

after heating

was described

for 24 h at

previouslyl.

Membrane

70”.

Dry weight of cehs

fractions

were dried in WKGO

above P,&.

A modification of the procedure of ROUGEAS AND BATTY was used for rhe assay of the various galactolipids in acetone column fractions. The Silica gel G (Mercl;, Germany) was purified thoroughly with a slight’iy modified washing &-ocedare according to BROEKHCYSE~ in order to ob’cain acceptable blanks. Thin-layer chronzatograms of the acetone fractions (r-1.5 mg of total gala~to~~~~d~ were developed in ch_;oroforr~l-met~lanol-cone.

ammonia

(70 : zo : 2, by vol.). The separated

galartolipid

bands were located by a brief exposure to iodine vapour. The iodine wa,s removed by leading over SO, gas and by heating the plate for a short period, The bands were scrapedinto centrifuge tubes, as were areas of comparable size from the blank zone of the plate. To the adsorbent in the centrifuge tubes were added I ml 2% aqueous phenol and 4 ml cont. H&33,, the latter addition being rapid to ensure maximum heating of the mixture. The contents -were throughly mixed on a Vortex mixer, allowed to stand at room temperature for rs min and centrifuged at TQOOOg for I; min. The extinction of the supernatants was measured at 480 nm against a water blank. Standards of 20 pg and 50 ,t~ggallactose gave extinctions and 0.528 & 0.01, respectively. RESULTS

AND

0.223

&

0.01

(S.D.)

DISCUSSIQX

The lipid content

of inhibited

which can be explained ‘TABLE

of

cells was higher than that of normal cells (Table I),

by the nearly absence

of the cell wall mucopeptide

layer and

I

ZIPID

COXTEKT

GROWN

WITII

AND

COMPOSITIOX

OR WITROUT

NUMASi

OF CELLS

.4ND

MEMBRANES

OF B.

biJ%hPn

VAR. jW?Z’JtSyh&c7As

MILK

were inoculated a.t 23’ and harvested after 16 h growth at 37”. The values are expressed as means with standard errors. Membrane preparations were prepared after lysozyme treatment of cells as described before1 and dried in vactlo above P,O,. The number of pfeparaticns, all ana!gzed in duplicate are given between parentheses.

Cells

the increased number of internal membranes in these cells?. The galactose content of the lipids decreased however remarkably. Data of the lipid content of the membrane fractions give a more useful comparison. The membrane lipid proved to be rather low in comparison to membranes of other gram-positive bacteria@. Snip for membranes of 3ac~~~~~ ~e~a~e~~~~ a similar value was reported lo. The relatively i low lipid content Biochirn. Biaphys. Acta,

231

(rgpj

545-549

GALACTOLIPID COMPOSITION OF

of the preparations ribonucleoprotein

B. bijdzw

may be caused

547

by the presence

and polysaccharide8.

Another

of the remarkable

amount

of

cause may be the fact that membrane

preparations were dried in vacua above P,O,. Membrane lipid did not change very much after cell wall inhibition, only the galactose content of the lipids decreased to about 50%. The decrease of the galactose content of the lipids was not due to the acidity 5.0-5.~

of the medium

of inhibited

cells at the time of harvesting

(pH 6.0-6.4

for the medium of normal cells). By column fractionation it was found that in normal cells 30-45%

lipid was accounted

by the phospholipids,

45-60%

by the glycolipids

veTsus

of the total and 1o-2o~~

by the neutral lipids. Alterations in the galactose content of the lipids were reflected in the distribution of the lipid fractions in cells in which cell wall synthesis was inhibited. indicated

The glycolipid fraction amounted to 15-30% an overall decrease of the galactolipids. The

of the total lipids, which polar fraction, containing

mainly phospholipids, was increased (60-70~/~) but the neutral fraction remained constant (IO-ZO~/~). Because the phosphorus content in total lipid extracts did not a phosphorus-free polar lipid may be change significantly after cell wall inhibitionl, eluted from the column together present

with the phospholipids.

time concerning the nature The decrease of the galactose

the glycolipid

fraction

galactolipids

at the

decrease of

from a shift between

glycolipids

could result

and/or from a decline of the total number the individual

No data are available

of this polar component. content of the lipids and the relative of glycolipid

the individual

molecules.

in normal cells of the late logarithmic

Determination

of

phase (16 h growth)

after inoculation at 23O showed high proportions of digalactosyldiglyceride and monogalactosyldiglyceride (Table II). The amount of acylmonogalactosyldiglyceride is less TABLE

II

GALA~TOLIPID GROWNWITN

COMPOSITION

0F

ORWITHOUTHUMAN

CELLS

bijidunz v_4~.pe?znsylvanicus

0FB.

INOCULATED

AT

23’

AND

MILK

Cells were harvested after 16 h of growth at 37”. The composition was determined by quantitative thin-layer chromatography of the total glycolipid fraction. The values are expressed as percent of total lipid galactose in the first two columns. Means with standard errors for duplicate determinations in three extracts are shown. The composition is given in percentages of total galactolipid molecules in the third and fourth column.

Galactolipid

Diacylmonogalactosyldiglyceride Monogalactosyldiglyceride (+acylmonogalactosyldiglyceride) Monogalactosylmonoglyceride Acyldigalactosyldiglyceride Digalactosyldiglyceride Trigalactosyldiglyceride

Galactolipad composition 0/Oof lipid gala&se (= 100)

0h of total galactolipid molecules (= 100)

+ Human milk

+ Human milk

3.5 f 22.8 1.1 8.6 52.6 11.4

& * f & *

- HWYLaVl milk

- Huvnan milk

0.29

9.5 f

1.34

5.6

13.8

0.64 0.40 0.57 0.50 0.15

31.2 *

1.41

36.9

45.2 3.3 3.5 28.8 5.8

2.3 i: 1.37 4.9 & 0.86 39.8 f 3.42 12.1 f 0.83

I.8 6.9 42.4 6.1

than 1% of lipid galactose. After cell wall inhibition a remarkable shift to monogalactosyldiglyceride and its acylated derivatives was observed. The total monogalactosyl lipids were increased from 44 to 62%. This increase was reflected in a drop of the total digalactosyl lipids which was about the same. Biochim. Biophys. Ada,

231

(1971)545-549

~noc~~atio~ of celis at 37” izstead of at 23” gave a. shortening of the lag phase from 8 to 4 II and a slightly lower pH value after a6 h growth. The proportions of the various gaiactolipids in normal cells remained the same (Table III). Inhibitedcellshowever showed a m&e distinct shift to total manogalactosyl lipids from 41 to 7ic/;i with a concomitant decrease cf total digalactosyl lipids. After 40 h growth (pH 3: harvest 5.5) the amount of trigalactosyldiglyceride of inhibited cells ixreased from 6 to x.jC;& at the cost of the total monoga!actosyl lipids (from Sz to 57%) and the total digaiactosyl lipids (from 32 to z~*/~o)_ TABI.E

III

GALACTOLIPID GXOU7N

WITH

COMPOSITIOX OR WITHOUT

OF

CELLS

HUMAN

B. ~.~~d~~~VAR.

OF

~~~Z~zSy~~U~~Z~C~~S INOCULATED

AT

3~~ ASD

EYJfLi<

Cells were harvested after 16 h of growth at 37>. The composition was determined by quantitative thin-layer chromatography of the total glycolipid fraction. The values are expressed as percent of total lipid galactose in the first two columns. Means with standard errors for duplicate determinations in three extracts are shown. The composition is given in percentages of total gaiactolipid molecules in the third and fourth column. ..~___ _._.. Galactolipid Galactolipid compositl:o9z .I__ - -..-._.._.__ 91, of lipid galaclose 74 of total glycol$Ad wkoleccdes (= 100) (= IOO)

Diacylmonogala,ctos~Idiglyceride Monogalactos yldiglyceride (+ acylmonogalactosyldigl~ceride~ Zlonogalactosyllnonoglyceride ~c~lldigalactosyld~glyceride Digalactosyldiglyceride Trigalactosyldiglyceride

..-.~.. Nwnm

+ Human

-_ Irlwm,an

$ N~tlman

-

mikk

milk

m itk

w&2 _I__.-

1.5 = 0.01

12.3 :t 1.36

2.5

15.7

22.6 i 0.44 0.9 = 0.45 12.4 = 1.28

37.7 rt 0.87 6.0 i- 0.81 9.9 r. 0.23

47.8 7.2 6.1

jZ.1

27.0

37-r 1.5 10.0 42.5 5.7

+

0.72

10.5 + 0.73 ~--

&

1.27

7.2 I: 0.96 ..- --.~

..-.

i7.2

5.3

The decrease of the galactose content of the lipids after cell wall inhibit&, anpeared to be caused not only by a decrease of the mean number of the galactose molecules/galactolipid molecule but also by a decrease of the proportion of gaiactolipids of total lipids (Table IV). The galactolipid content of the total cell decreases still after cell wall inhibition in spite of the near absence of the mucopeptide. The

GXLACTOLIPXU

CO3TENT

OF CELLS

ANU

MEMIBRASES

OF ./it. bij%&m YAR.

~en?Z.~~~~~~z~~l,~S

Cellswereiaoc~~lated at 23’ and harvested after IS h of growth at 37” with or without human milk. Values were calculated out the data of Tables I and II.

{Lmoles galactose/,umole galactolipid pmoles galactolipid/mg lipid ,umoles galactolipid/mg dry weight _____-~.---

1.62

1.44

1.62

I.44

0.28

0.18

0.27

0.16

0.017

o.or4 -~.

0.022 -__---

o.or5

_ _--

amount of gakactolipid molecules/mg membrane decreased about 33% together with the decrease of the mean nuniber of galactose rnoleculesig~ac~o~~~~d molecule. The most probable e~F~ana~on for the decrease of the galactose content of the

GALACTOLIPID

COMPOSITION

OF B.

bijdum

519

lipids seems to be a competition for UDP-galactose. After cell wall inhibition an outer electron-dense layer was always seen in electronmicrographs of these cells before and after treatment with lysozyme*. This layer presumably consists of cell wall polysaccharide material composed of glucose, galactose and rhamnosell. Increase of polysaccharide synthesis could be a compensation for the lack of a rigid peptidoglycan layer and could compete with glycolipid synthesis for UDP-galactose. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors are indebted to Mr. G. A. M. Rutten for excellent technical assistance. REFERENCES F. A. EXTERKATE AND J. H. VEERKAMP, Biochim.Bio$hys. Acta, 176 (1969) 65. P. GYBRGY, R. F. NORRIS AND C. S. ROSE, Arch.Biochem.Biophys., 24 (1954) 193.

G. BASCHANG, Fovtschv. Chew.. Ovg. Naturstoffe, 20 (1962) 200. M. C. GLICK, T. SALL, F. ZILLIKEN AND S. MUDD, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 37 (1960) 361. J. H. VEERKAMP, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 210 (1970) 267. P. G. ROUGHAN AND R.D. BATT, Anal.Biochem., 22 (1968) 74. R. M. BROEKHUYSE, Biochim.Biophys. Acta, 152 (1968) 307. F. A.EXTERKATE,G.F.J.VRENSENAND J.H.VEERKAMP, Biochim.Biophys. Acta, 219 (1970) 141. 9 M. R. J. SALTON, Ann. Rev. Micvobiol., 21 (1967) 417. IO S. MIZUSHIMA, M. ISHARA AND K. KITAHARA, J. Biochem. Tokyo, 59 (1966) 374. R. LAMBERT AND Y. SAITO, Arch.Biocheun.Biophys., 112 (1965) 120. II J. H. VEERKAMP, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 231 (1971)545-549