Toxicology Letters, 60 (1992) 325-328 0 1992 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. All rights reserved
TOXLET
325 0378-4274192/S
05.00
02709
Biphasic effects of smoking on human serum dopamine-p-hydroxylase activity
Teruo Nagaya”, Akemi Takahashib, and Michie Yokoyamab “Department
of Public Health,
Gifu University
Izumi Yoshidab
School of Medicine
and hGifU-shi Central
Public Health
Center, Gifti, (Japan) (Received (Accepted
9 October 1991) 16 December 1991)
Key words: Smoking
habits;
Nicotine;
Dopamine-P-hydroxylase;
Sympathetic
nerve activity;
Blood pres-
sure
SUMMARY To investigate droxylase
(DBH)
the chronic activity
effects
of smoking
was determined
on sympathetic
in 119 male non-smokers
nerve activity,
serum
dopamine-P-hy-
and 183 age-matched
male smokers.
The smokers were classified into 3 groups: 51 light smokers (l-19 cigarettes/day), 76 moderate smokers (20 cigarettes/day), and 56 heavy smokers (more than 20 cigarettes/day). The light smokers had the highest mean DBH activity,
and the heavy
smokers
had the lowest mean
DBH activity
in the 4 groups.
These
results suggest that light smoking stimulates the sympathetic nervous system, but that heavy smoking depresses the system. These biphasic changes in DBH activity are similar to the pharmacological effects of nicotine
on the peripheral
sympathetic
nervous
system.
INTRODUCTION
Cigarette smoke contains many chemical compounds. Among these, nicotine is thought to have the most effects on the human nervous system. Nicotine stimulates the sympathetic nervous system and adrenal medulla, and increases plasma catecholamine concentrations [ 11. Smoking also increases plasma catecholamine concentrations and induces transient hypertension in humans [l]. However, the chronic effects of smoking on the human sympathetic nervous system are obscure. Lower blood pressure in smokers than in non-smokers [2-51 may indicate suppression of the Correspondence to: Teruo Nagaya, Department 40 Tsukasa-machi, Gifu-shi 500, Japan.
of Public
Health,
Gifu University
School
of Medicine,
326
sympathetic nervous system by smoking. Dopamine-/?-hydroxylase (DBH), an enzyme converting dopamine to norepinephrine, is one of the catecholamine-synthesizing enzymes. Since DBH is secreted into the blood with catecholamines from sympathetic nerve terminals, and is much more stable in blood than catecholamines, serum DBH activity is a possible index of chronic sympathetic nerve activity [6]. In this study, serum DBH activity was determined in young male non-smokers and smokers to investigate the chronic effects of smoking on the sympathetic nervous system. SUBJECTS
AND METHODS
The subjects were 302 males who had visited the Gifu-shi Central Public Health Center for a health check for 30-year-olds from August 1989 to May 1990. All subjects were 30 years old and apparently healthy. The subjects were composed of I 19 non-smokers and 183 smokers. The smokers were classified into 3 groups according to the number of cigarettes smoked per day: 5 1 light smokers (1-l 9 cigarettes/day), 76 moderate smokers (20 cigarettes/day), and 56 heavy smokers (> 20 cigarettes/day). The data on the smoking habits of the subjects were taken from medical records in the Public Health Center. Venous blood was taken from each subject at 9910 a.m. before breakfast. The serum of the subjects was used for their ‘health check’, and the residual serum was stored at -20°C until DBH analysis by the method of Nagatsu and Udenfriend [7]. DBH activity was expressed in international units @mol/min)/l serum. One-way analysis of variance and Scheffe’s method were used to compare mean values for the 4 groups (non-smokers and 3 groups of smokers). Finally, the linear correlation coefficient test was used. All the tests were two-sided and statistical significance was fixed at P
Serum DBH activity in relation to smoking habits are summarized in Table I (means f SD) and P-values by Scheffe’s method for the 4 groups are presented in Table II. The mean DBH activities for the non-smokers and the total smokers were 22.9 and 22.2 IUil respectively (Table I). The difference was not significant. In subgroups of the smokers, the mean activities for the light, moderate and heavy smokers were 25.9, 22.1 and 18.8 IU/l, respectively. F- and P-values by one-way analysis of variance for the non-smokers and the 3 groups of smokers were 3.393 and 0.018 respectively (Table I). The Scheffe method revealed that light smokers had a significantly higher DBH activity than heavy smokers, but the differences in DBH activity between the two groups, except for the combination (light smokers vs. heavy smokers), were not significant (Table II). DBH activity was significantly negatively correlated with the number of cigarettes
321
TABLE SERUM
I DOPAMINE-p-HYDROXYLASE
30-YEAR-OLD Smoking
MALES
(MEAN
(DBH)
ACTIVITY
BY SMOKING
HABITS
habits
n
No. of cigarettes
DBH activity
per day
(IUIl serum)
Non-smokers
119
0
Smokers
183
21.7-t
22.2k11.6
51
11.6& 3.6
25.9+ 13.3
Moderate smokers Heavy smokers
76 56
20.0+ 33.2-t
22.1+_11.1
Total
302
0.0 7.9
18.8k 9.3 22.5*11.7
13.1z!z13.0
F
3.393
P
0.018 by one-way
302
22.9&l 1.9 9.6
Light smokers
F- and P-values
IN
i- SD)
analysis
of variance
for the 4 groups
(the non-smokers
and the 3 smoker
groups).
smoked subjects
per day in the 183 smokers (Y = -0.110, P = 0.056).
(I’ = -0.192,
P = 0.009)
but not in all the 302
DISCUSSION
The light smokers had the highest DBH activity, whereas the heavy smokers had the lowest DBH activity in the 4 groups (the non-smokers and the 3 groups of smokers). The difference in DBH activity between the two groups was significant. Therefore, the DBH activity was significantly negatively correlated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day in the smokers, but not in all the subjects including nonsmokers. These results suggest biphasic changes in DBH activity induced by smoking. Light smoking may stimulate the peripheral sympathetic nervous system, whereas heavy smoking may depress the system. These biphasic effects are similar to the pharmacological effects of nicotine on the peripheral nervous system. Small doses of TABLE
II
P-VALUES ANALYSIS
BETWEEN TWO GROUPS ASSESSED BY SCHEFFL’S OF VARIANCE FOR THE FOUR GROUPS
Groups
METHOD
AFTER
Non-
Light
Moderate
smokers
smokers
smokers
Non-smokers Light smokers
_ 0.500
0.500 _
0.978 0.367
0.198 0.021
Moderate smokers Heavy smokers
0.978 0.198
0.367 0.02 1
0.452
0.452 _
ONE-WAY
Heavy smokers
328
nicotine stimulate the peripheral symphathetic nervous system, but large doses depress the system [8]. The effects of smoking on DBH activity are possibly derived from the biological effects of nicotine in tobacco smoke. A previous study reported lower DBH activities in smokers than in non-smokers, but did not disclose the biphasic pattern found in the present study [9]. The previous report did not mention age distribution according to smoking habits in the subjects. Since serum DBH activity was influenced by age [lo, 111, the age of the subjects might have confounded the results in the previous study. In epidemiological studies, smokers had a lower blood pressure than non-smokers [2-51, and an inverse dose-response relationship between blood pressure and smoking was found in some studies [4,5]. These results suggest chronic depression of the sympathetic nervous system produced by smoking, and are consistent with our results in the heavy smokers, but not with those in the light smokers. The biphasic doseresponse relationship between blood pressure and smoking has not been found in human population studies. It is well known that blood pressure is influenced by many other factors (age, sex, body composition, exercise, personality, diet, drinking habits etc.). Since higher DBH activity in light smokers than in non-smokers is statistically insignificant in this study, such slight effects may be veiled by the effects of these other factors on blood pressure in human population studies. REFERENCES I Oates, J.A. and Wood, A.J.J. (1988) Pharmacologic tion. N. Engl. J. Med. 319, 1318-1330. 2 Green, findings. 3 Green,
M.S., Jucha, Am. Heart
E. and Luz, Y. (1986) Blood pressure
of cigarette
in smokers
smoking
and nicotine
and nonsmokers:
addic-
epidemiologic
J. 111, 932-940.
M.S. and Schwartz,
rate. Am. Heart
aspects
K.
(1991)Cigarette
smoking
related to ambulatory
blood pressure
and heart
J. 121, 156991570.
4 Berglund, G. and Wihelmsen, L. (1975) Factors related sample of Swedish men. Acta Med. Stand. 198, 291-298.
to blood
pressure
in a general
population
5 Goldbourt, U. and Medalie, J.H. (1977) Characteristics of smokers, non-smokers and ex-smokers among 10 000 adults males in Israel. Am. J. Epidemiol. 105, 75586. 6 Kopin, I.J. (1989) Plasma levels of catecholamines and dopamine$?-hydroxylase. In: U. Trendelenburg and N. Weiner (Eds.), Berlin, pp. 21 l-275.
Handbook
of Experimental
7 Nagatsu, T. and Udenfriend, S., Photometric blood. Clin. Chem. 18 (1972) 980-983. 8 Taylor. P. (1985) Ganglionic Rall and F. Murad (Eds.). York, pp. 215-221.
assay
Pharmacology,
Vol. 90, Part 2, Springer-Verlag,
of dopamine-/j’-hydroxylase
activity
in human
stimulating and blocking agents. In: A.G. Gilman, L.S. Goodman. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 7th edit.. Macmillan,
T.W. New
9 Huttunen, J.K., Pispa. J., Kumlin, T., Mattila, S., Naukkarinen, V. and Miettinen. T. (1979) Lack of correlation between serum dopamine-j-hydroxylase activity and blood pressure in middle-aged men. Hypertension 1, 47752. 10 Nagaya, T., Ishikawa, N. and Hata, H. (1990) No change in serum dopamine-/-hydroxylase activity in workers exposed to trichloroethylene. Toxicol. Lett. 54, 221-227. 11 Miyata, S., Nagata, H., Yamao, S., Nakamura, S. and Kamcyama, M. (1984) Dopamine-/I-hydroxylase activities in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of aged and demented patients. J. Neurol. Sci. 63, 403-409.