Burkholderia gut symbionts enhance the innate immunity of host Riptortus pedestris

Burkholderia gut symbionts enhance the innate immunity of host Riptortus pedestris

Accepted Manuscript Burkholderia gut symbionts enhance the innate immunity of host Riptortus pedestris Jiyeun Kate Kim, Jun Beom Lee, Ye Rang Huh, Ho ...

970KB Sizes 0 Downloads 22 Views

Accepted Manuscript Burkholderia gut symbionts enhance the innate immunity of host Riptortus pedestris Jiyeun Kate Kim, Jun Beom Lee, Ye Rang Huh, Ho Am Jang, Chan Hee Kim, Jin Wook Yoo, Bok Luel Lee PII:

S0145-305X(15)30011-2

DOI:

10.1016/j.dci.2015.07.006

Reference:

DCI 2428

To appear in:

Developmental and Comparative Immunology

Received Date: 31 May 2015 Revised Date:

5 July 2015

Accepted Date: 6 July 2015

Please cite this article as: Kim, J.K., Lee, J.B., Huh, Y.R., Jang, H.A., Kim, C.H., Yoo, J.W., Lee, B.L., Burkholderia gut symbionts enhance the innate immunity of host Riptortus pedestris, Developmental and Comparative Immunology (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2015.07.006. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Developmental and Comparative Immunology: Short Communications

2

Burkholderia gut symbionts enhance the innate immunity of host Riptortus

4

pedestris

RI PT

3

5

Jiyeun Kate Kima, Jun Beom Leeb, Ye Rang Huhb, Ho Am Jangb, Chan Hee Kimb, Jin Wook Yoob,

7

Bok Luel Leeb*

SC

6

9

a

M AN U

8

Department of Department of Microbiology, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan 602-703,

10

South Korea; bGlobal Research Laboratory of Insect Symbiosis, College of Pharmacy, Pusan National

11

University, Busan 609-735, South Korea

TE D

12

*Corresponding author: Tel: +82-51-510-2809, FAX: +82-51-513-2801, E-mail address:

14

[email protected] (B.L.Lee)

AC C

15

EP

13

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract

17

The relation between gut symbiosis and immunity has been reported in various animal model studies.

18

Here, we corroborate the effect of gut symbiont to host immunity using the bean bug model. The bean

19

bug, Riptortus pedestris, is a useful gut symbiosis model due to the monospecific gut symbiont, genus

20

Burkholderia. To examine the effect of gut symbiosis to host immunity, we generated the gut

21

symbiont-harboring (symbiotic) insect line and the gut symbiont-lacking (aposymbiotic) insect line.

22

Upon bacterial challenges, the symbiotic Riptortus exhibited better survival than aposymbiotic

23

Riptortus. When cellular immunity was inhibited, the symbiotic Riptortus still survived better than

24

aposymbioic Riptortus, suggesting stronger humoral immunity. The molecular basis of the strong

25

humoral immunity was further confirmed by the increase of hemolymph antimicrobial activity and

26

antimicrobial peptide expression in the symbiotic insects. Taken together, our data clearly demonstrate

27

that Burkhoderia gut symbiont positively affect the Riptortus systemic immunity.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

16

28

Highlights (85 characters including spaces)

TE D

29



Symbiotic insect survives a bacterial infection better than aposymbiotic insect.

31



Symbiotic insect exhibits stronger humoral immunity than aposymbiotic insect.

32



Hemolymph of symbiotic insect has a high level of antimicrobial activity.

33



Gut symbiosis induces higher expression of antimicrobial peptides in host insect.

AC C

34

EP

30

35

Keywords

36

Gut symbiosis, Innate immunity, Antimicrobial peptide, Riptortus pedestris, Burkholderia symbiont

37

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction

39

Gut symbiosis has drawn a large amount of attention because the gut microbiota is known to be

40

pivotal to human health (Sekirov et al., 2010). Gut symbionts are intimately involved in numerous

41

aspects of host biology, from nutrient metabolism to brain and behavior (Cryan and Dinan, 2012;

42

Sommer and Backhed, 2013). The intimate relationship between gut microbiota and human

43

immunologic diseases implies gut microbial signals modulating host’s immune systems (Abt and Artis,

44

2009). Using the germ-free murine model, the importance of the gut microbiota has been revealed in

45

the development of the adaptive immune system, and the gut microbiota disturbances may lead to the

46

dysregulation of adaptive immune cells, possibly resulting disorders such as inflammatory bowel

47

disease. (Round and Mazmanian, 2009). Similarly, insect gut symbiosis models have showed the

48

association of gut symbiosis and host’s innate immunity. Tsetse flies (Glossina spp.), the sole vector

49

of protozoan African trypanosomes causing Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT, sleeping sickness),

50

possess commensal Sodalis and obligate Wigglesworthia as their major gut microbes. The tsetse flies

51

without Wigglesworthia exhibit an irregular expression of humoral and epithelial immunity-related

52

genes and decreased numbers of phagocytic hemocytes (Weiss et al., 2012; Weiss et al., 2011). Some

53

other insect studies researched on the effect of Wolbachia, which is not a gut symbiont, to host insect

54

immunity. In fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) and mosquito (Aedes aegypti), Wolbachia symbiont

55

increased the host survival against pathogen infections (Hedges et al., 2008; Moreira et al., 2009;

56

Walker et al., 2011). One of mechanisms explaining this protection was proposed as an immune

57

priming in which Wolbachia stimulates the basal immune responses and helps to prepare host insect

58

against subsequent infections (Rances et al., 2012).

59

Recently, the bean bug Riptortus pedestris, belonging to the stinkbug family Alydidae in the insect

60

order Hemiptera, has been recognized as a useful gut symbiosis model because they harbor a specific

61

gut symbiont of β-proteobacterial genus Burkholderia. This insect orally acquires their Burkholderia

62

symbionts from the rhizosphere environment in every generation (Kikuchi et al., 2007). When the

63

Burkholderia cells colonize the posterior midgut region (M4 region) of the Riptortus, the numerous

64

crypts of the M4 region are filled with the Burkholderia cells, leading to the exclusive gut symbiotic

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

38

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT association between Riptortus and Burkholderia symbiont (Kikuchi et al., 2005). Because newly

66

hatched R. pedestris nymphs are aposymbiotic (not possessing symbionts), symbiotic and

67

aposymbiotic insect lines are easily established by controlling the feeding of the cultured Burkholderia

68

cells. Reflecting its free-living origin in the environment, Burkholderia symbiont is easily cultivable

69

on standard microbiological media and consequently amenable to genetic manipulation. The

70

genetically manipulated symbiont strains have been used to understand molecular mechanism of

71

symbiotic association (Kim and Lee, 2015).

72

Previous studies on the Riptortus-Burkholderia symbiosis show that Burkholderia gut symbiont

73

positively affects the host fitness and gut development (Kikuchi et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2014b; Kim et

74

al., 2014c; Kim et al., 2013c). In this study, we explored the effect of the Burkholderia gut symbiont

75

to the Riptortus host systemic immunity. Using the symbiotic and aposymbiotic insects, survival rates

76

against bacterial septic infection were measured to examine overall immune defense as well as

77

humoral immune defense. Subsequently, the levels of antimicrobial activity of hemolymph and the

78

expression of antimicrobial peptides were examined to determine the molecular basis of the difference

79

in humoral immune responses between the symbiotic and aposymbiotic insects.

80

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

65

2. Materials and methods

82

2.1. Bacteria and media.

83

Escherichia coli K12 and Staphylococcus aureus RN4220 cells were cultured at 37°C with LB

84

medium (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% NaCl). Burkholderia symbiont RPE75 strain, a

85

spontaneous rifampicin resistant strain derived from RPE64 strain (Kikuchi et al., 2011), was cultured

86

at 30°C with YG-RIF medium (0.4% glucose, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.1% NaCl, 30 µg/ml rifampicin).

87

2.2. Insect rearing.

88

The bean bugs R. pedestris were reared in our insect laboratory at 28°C under a long day regime of 16

89

h light and 8 h dark as described (Kim et al., 2013b). Nymphal insects were reared in clean plastic

90

containers (34 cm long, 19.5 cm wide and 27.5 cm high) supplied with soybean seeds and DWA

AC C

EP

81

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (distilled water containing 0.05% ascorbic acid). Upon reaching adulthood, the insects were

92

transferred to bigger containers (35 cm long, 35 cm wide and 40 cm high) in which soybean plant pots

93

were placed for feeding and cotton pads were attached to the walls for egg laying. Eggs were collected

94

daily and transferred to new cages for hatching.

95

2.3. Burkholderia symbiont infection.

96

Burkholderia symbiont strain RPE75 was cultured at 30°C in YG-RIF medium. An inoculum solution

97

was prepared by suspending mid-log phase cultured Burkholderia cells in DWA at a concentration of

98

107 cells/ml. Newly-molted second instar nymphs were provided with wet cotton balls soaked with the

99

inoculum solution for two days and then reared on sterile DWA and soybean seeds. To generate the

SC

RI PT

91

aposymbiotic insect not harboring Burkholderia cells, we did not provide Burkholderia inoculum

101

solution but only sterile DWA.

102

2.4. Bacterial septic infection and measurement of survival rate.

103

Bacterial cells were washed with PBS (phosphate buffered saline, Gibco) and suspended with Grace’s

104

Insect Medium (Gibco) to have 1010 cells/ml bacterial solutions. Two µl of the bacterial cell solutions

105

were injected to male adult R. pedestris three days after the molting into adult. The survival rate was

106

monitored every 24 h after bacteria septic injection.

107

To inhibit phagocytosis activity of hemocytes, we injected latex bead solution (FluoSpheres®

108

Fluorescent Microspheres; Invitrogen) prior to the bacterial injection. Beads were washed with PBS

109

and suspended with Grace’s Insect Medium to have 3.6×1013 beads/ml solution. One µl of the bead

110

solution was injected to adult R. pedestris one day prior to the bacterial challenge. The insect’s

111

survival was monitored every 24 h.

112

2.5. Hemolymph preparation.

113

Hemolymph was collected from the insects that were injected with E. coli as described above. Around

114

17 h post injections, the hemolymph were collected in decoaggulation buffer (30 mM trisodium citrate,

115

26 mM citric acid, 15 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM EDTA, pH 4.6) by cutting legs. The ratio of

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

100

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT hemolymph to decoaggulation buffer was 1:9. The collected hemolymph solution was centrifuged at

117

20,000 × g for 15 min and the supernatants were boiled at 95°C for 5 min. After cooling the solution,

118

the hemolymph solution was centrifuged once more at 20,000 × g for 15 min and the final

119

supernatants were collected.

120

2.6. Hemolymph susceptibility assay.

121

The mid-log phase E. coli and S. aureus cells were washed with PBS (phosphate buffered saline,

122

Gibco) and suspended with PBS to have approximately 105 cells per 50 µl. To fifty µl of cell solution,

123

350 µl of different concentrations of hemolymph solutions were added. The different concentrations of

124

hemolymph solution were prepared by containing 0.5, 0.75, 1 or 1.25 µl of the hemolymph

125

supernatant prepared as mentioned above. The mixture of bacteria cells and hemolymph was

126

incubated at 37°C for 2 h. After incubation, the cell and hemolymph solutions were diluted and mixed

127

with 16 ml of 1% LB agar which was previously autoclaved and kept unsolidified at 50°C, and poured

128

onto a Petri dish. Colony forming unit (CFU) were counted after 10 h incubation at 37°C.

129

2.6. Measurement of expression of AMP genes.

130

The expression of AMP genes were measured in the fat body of insects at 17 h post septic injection.

131

The dissected fat bodies were subjected to RNA extraction using RiboEx (GeneAll, South Korea). The

132

RNA samples were reverse transcribed using TOPscript RT DryMIX containing oligo-dT primers

133

(enzynomics, South Korea) to synthesize cDNA. cDNA was subjected to real-time quantitative PCR

134

after mixed with a TOPreal qPCR 2x PreMIX with SYBR green (enzynomics, South Korea) and 0.25

135

µM each of the primers: rip-defensin (accession number AK416895) primer set, 5’-TCG GTC GGA

136

CTG AGA CTG AA-3’, 5’-TTG CCG CCT TTG TAT CCC TT-3’; riptocin (AB842297) primer set,

137

5’- TCC GAA GCT GAG GGT CTT CCC G-3’, 5’-TCC GCA TCC AAG TTC GCG TCC-3’; rip-

138

thanatins (AB842298) primer set, 5’- GTC TGC CTT CGT TGA AGA CG-3’, 5’- ATT CGC TTG

139

CAA ACG CCG-3’; elongation factor 1 alpha (AB591382) primer set, 5’- CCT GCA TCC GTT GCT

140

TTT GT-3’, 5’-GGC ATC GAG GGC TTC AAT AA-3’. The PCR temperature profile was set to

141

95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 15 sec and 72°C for 20 sec using

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

116

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT CFX96 real time PCR system (Bio-Rad). The comparative CT (∆∆CT) method was used to calculate

143

relative gene expression levels with elongation factor 1 alpha (EF1α) gene of R. pedestris as an

144

endogenous control gene.

145

2.7. Statistical analyses.

146

The statistical significance of data was determined using a Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon survival test or

147

two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post-hoc test, provided in the Prism GraphPad software.

RI PT

142

SC

148 3. Results

150

3.1. Insect harboring gut symbiont survives better against bacterial septic infection than insects lacking

151

gut symbiont.

152

To address the question whether the host’s systemic immunity can be affected by gut symbiosis, the

153

survival rates of Riptortus hosts harboring Burkholderia symbiont (symbiotic insects) and lacking

154

Burkholderia symbiont (aposymbiotic insects) were monitored after bacterial challenges. When the

155

Gram-negative E. coli cells were injected into hemocoele of adult Riptortus, the symbiotic insects

156

exhibited significantly better survival than the aposymbiotic insects (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test, P

157

= 0.0018) (Fig. 1A, i). The symbiotic insects also survived the Gram-positive S. aureus septic

158

infection better than the aposymbiotic insects (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1A, ii).

159

These results indicate that gut symbiosis with Burkholderia symbiont positively affect the Riptortus

160

host’s defense against systemic bacterial infection.

TE D

EP

AC C

161

M AN U

149

162

3.2. The symbiotic insects have better humoral immune defense than the aposymbiotic insects.

163

The insect immunity comprises cellular immunity and humoral immunity, in which the phagocytosis

164

of hemocytes is a main cellular immune response, and the action of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) is a

165

major part of humoral immune responses. To examine the effect of gut symbiosis to humoral 7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT immunity, we saturated phagocytosis in the Riptortus by injecting latex beads into the hemocoele

167

(Supplementary Fig. S1). These beads are taken up, but not degraded, by hemocytes, and thus

168

effectively block the cellular immune response (Elrod-Erickson et al., 2000). Even though the cellular

169

immune responses were inhibited by the beads, the symbiotic insects still exhibited significantly better

170

survival than the aposymbiotic insects against E. coli infection (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test, P =

171

0.035) (Fig. 1B, i) and against S. aureus infection (Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test, P = 0.031) (Fig. 1B,

172

ii), indicating stronger humoral immune responses in insects harboring gut symbionts.

RI PT

166

SC

173

3.3. The antimicrobial activity of hemolymph of the symbiotic insect is stronger than that of the

175

aposymbiotic insects.

176

We further addressed the molecular basis of the strong humoral immune defense of the symbiotic

177

insects. The activated hemolymph of the symbiotic and aposymbiotic adult insects were collected at

178

17 h post E. coli injection and subjected to boiling and centrifugation to remove large proteins. The

179

antimicrobial activity of the hemolymph solution was accessed by their killing effect to the E. coli

180

cells. When the same volume of hemolymph of the symbiotic and aposymbiotic insects was compared,

181

the hemolymph of symbiotic insects exhibit much stronger antimicrobial activity than that of

182

aposymbiotic insects (two-way ANOVA, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2A).

TE D

EP AC C

183

M AN U

174

184

3.4. The symbiotic insect exhibits higher AMP expression than the aposymbiotic insect.

185

Riptortus is a hemimetabolous insect whose innate immune mechanisms are much less studied than

186

holometabolous insects such as Drosophila, Manduca and Tenebrio (Lemaitre and Hoffmann, 2007).

187

However, we have identified three major AMPs of Riptortus by protein purification (Kim et al., 2015)

188

confirmed by the data of expressed-sequence tags (EST) (Futahashi et al., 2013) and RNA sequencing

189

(Futahashi et al., unpublished data). In searching for the molecular basis of the strong humoral

190

immunity and the increased antimicrobial activity of hemolymph of the symbiotic insect, we examined

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the expression of the Riptortus AMPs in the fat body of the symbiotic and aposymbiotic adult insects.

192

While the basal expressions of riptocin, rip-defensin and rip-thanatin were similar between the

193

symbiotic and aposymbiotic insects, the expression of AMPs were significantly more increased in the

194

symbiotic insects than in the aposymbiotic insects upon bacterial infection (Fig. 2B). These results

195

indicate that gut symbiosis can enhance the induction of AMP expression in the fat body in response

196

to the bacterial systemic challenge.

RI PT

191

197 4. Discussion

199

Here, we report that gut symbiosis enhances the host immunity in the bean bug Riptortus model

200

system. The gut symbiont-harboring bean bug survives better in bacterial septic challenges and

201

exhibits a strong humoral immune response by expressing significantly higher level of antimicrobial

202

peptides than the gut symbiont-free bean bug. Along with the previous reports from other animal

203

studies, our study again reinforces the intimate association between gut symbiosis and host immunity.

204

By utilizing the simplicity of the Riptortus-Burkholdera gut symbiosis, we hope to further extend our

205

understanding how the gut symbionts affect the host systemic immunity in molecular level.

206

Through this study, we additionally acquired information about the characteristics of Riptortus

207

immune responses. Data in Figure 1B, in which the latex bead injection distinguished the effect of

208

humoral and cellular immune responses, suggest that different immune responses of the Riptortus are

209

critical to E. coli and S. aureus infections. In E. coli infection, we did not observe a significantly

210

different survival rate between bead-injected and none-injected insects, indicating little protective

211

effect of the cellular immune response against E. coli. However, the survival rate after S. aureus

212

infection was significantly different between bead-injected and none-injected insect (aposymbiotic

213

insect, P = 0.036; symbiotic insect, P = 0.049 by Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test), suggesting that the

214

cellular immune response contributes significantly to the host defense against S. aureus infection.

215

These results correlate with our recent data about the hemolymph antimicrobial activity. The activated

216

hemolymph exhibited a dose dependent antimicrobial activity against E. coli, but not against S. aureus

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

198

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Kim et al., unpublished data). Therefore, it seems that the cellular immunity is important for the S.

218

aureus clearance in the hemocoele of Riptortus, and the humoral immunity is more effective to the

219

defense against E. coli.

220

Immune priming is one of the proposed mechanisms in enhanced insect immunity by Wolbachia

221

symbiont (Moreira et al., 2009; Rances et al., 2012). It suggests that harboring the Wolbachia

222

symbiont increases the basal immune responses in host insects. In our data, the AMP expression in the

223

Burkholderia-harboring bean bugs was similar to that of aposymbiotic bean bugs after buffer-injection

224

(Fig. 2B) and none-injection (data not shown). These suggest that the basal immune responses of the

225

symbiotic bean bugs were not significantly different from the aposymbiotic bean bugs. However, upon

226

bacterial infection, the extent of the activated immune responses was much greater in the gut

227

symbiont-harboring bean bug (Fig. 2B).

228

The molecular mechanism of how gut symbionts enhance the host systemic immunity, through general

229

health improvement by nutritional support or specific immune enhancement by gut symbiont-derived

230

signals, is a big question to answer. In order to answer this question, the hemimetabolous Riptortus

231

innate immunity should be understood in great detail as well as the mechanisms of the gut symbiosis.

232

Currently, RNA sequencing analysis on the immune genes of the R. pedestris has been done

233

(Futahashi et al., unpublished data) and expected to provide important information about

234

hemimetabolous insect immunity. We also have been investigating molecular mechanisms of

235

establishing the Riptortus gut symbiosis (Kim et al., 2014a; Kim et al., 2013a). Therefore, by studying

236

various aspects of the Riptortus-Burkholderia model system and interconnecting the results, we hope

237

to unveil the molecular cross-talks between Burkholderia gut symbiont and Riptortus innate immunity

238

in near future.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

217

239 240 241

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Acknowledgements

243

This study was supported by the Global Research Laboratory Program (grant number 2011-0021535)

244

and Basic Science Research Program (grant number 2014R1A1A4A01007507) of the National

245

Research Foundation of Korea.

RI PT

242

246 References

248

Abt, M.C., Artis, D., 2009. The intestinal microbiota in health and disease: the influence of microbial

249

products on immune cell homeostasis. Current opinion in gastroenterology 25, 496-502.

250

Cryan, J.F., Dinan, T.G., 2012. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on

251

brain and behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 701-712.

252

Elrod-Erickson, M., Mishra, S., Schneider, D., 2000. Interactions between the cellular and humoral

253

immune responses in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 10, 781-784.

254

Futahashi, R., Tanaka, K., Tanahashi, M., Nikoh, N., Kikuchi, Y., Lee, B.L., Fukatsu, T., 2013. Gene

255

expression in gut symbiotic organ of stinkbug affected by extracellular bacterial symbiont. PLoS One

256

8, e64557.

257

Hedges, L.M., Brownlie, J.C., O'Neill, S.L., Johnson, K.N., 2008. Wolbachia and virus protection in

258

insects. Science 322, 702.

259

Kikuchi, Y., Hosokawa, T., Fukatsu, T., 2007. Insect-microbe mutualism without vertical

260

transmission: a stinkbug acquires a beneficial gut symbiont from the environment every generation.

261

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 4308-4316.

262

Kikuchi, Y., Hosokawa, T., Fukatsu, T., 2011a. An ancient but promiscuous host-symbiont association

263

between Burkholderia gut symbionts and their heteropteran hosts. ISME J. 5, 446-460.

264

Kikuchi, Y., Hosokawa, T., Fukatsu, T., 2011b. Specific developmental window for establishment of

265

an insect-microbe gut symbiosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 4075-4081.

266

Kikuchi, Y., Meng, X.Y., Fukatsu, T., 2005. Gut symbiotic bacteria of the genus Burkholderia in the

267

broad-headed bugs Riptortus clavatus and Leptocorisa chinensis (Heteroptera : Alydidae). Appl.

268

Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4035-4043.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

247

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Kim, J.K., Han, S.H., Kim, C.H., Jo, Y.H., Futahashi, R., Kikuchi, Y., Fukatsu, T., Lee, B.L., 2014a.

270

Molting-associated suppression of symbiont population and up-regulation of antimicrobial activity in

271

the midgut symbiotic organ of the Riptortus-Burkholderia symbiosis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 43, 10-14.

272

Kim, J.K., Jang, H.A., Won, Y.J., Kikuchi, Y., Heum Han, S., Kim, C.H., Nikoh, N., Fukatsu, T., Lee,

273

B.L., 2014b. Purine biosynthesis-deficient Burkholderia mutants are incapable of symbiotic

274

accommodation in the stinkbug. ISME J. 8, 552-563.

275

Kim, J.K., Kim, N.H., Jang, H.A., Kikuchi, Y., Kim, C.H., Fukatsu, T., Lee, B.L., 2013a. Specific

276

midgut region controlling the symbiont population in an insect-microbe gut symbiotic association.

277

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 7229-7233.

278

Kim, J.K., Kwon, J.Y., Kim, S.K., Han, S.H., Won, Y.J., Lee, J.H., Kim, C.H., Fukatsu, T., Lee, B.L.,

279

2014c. Purine biosynthesis, biofilm formation, and persistence of an insect-microbe gut symbiosis.

280

Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 4374-4382.

281

Kim, J.K., Lee, B.L., 2015. Symbiotic factors in Burkholderia essential for establishing an association

282

with the bean bug, Riptortus pedestris. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 88, 4-17.

283

Kim, J.K., Lee, H.J., Kikuchi, Y., Kitagawa, W., Nikoh, N., Fukatsu, T., Lee, B.L., 2013b. Bacterial

284

cell wall synthesis gene uppP is required for Burkholderia colonization of the stinkbug gut. Appl.

285

Environ. Microbiol. 79, 4879-4886.

286

Kim, J.K., Son, D.W., Kim, C.H., Cho, J.H., Marchetti, R., Silipo, A., Sturiale, L., Park, H.Y., Huh,

287

Y.R., Nakayama, H., Fukatsu, T., Molinaro, A., Lee, B.L., 2015. Insect gut symbiont's susceptibility

288

to host antimicrobial peptides caused by alteration of bacterial cell envelope. J. Biol. Chem. pii:

289

jbc.M115.651158. [Epub ahead of print]

290

Kim, J.K., Won, Y.J., Nikoh, N., Nakayama, H., Han, S.H., Kikuchi, Y., Rhee, Y.H., Park, H.Y.,

291

Kwon, J.Y., Kurokawa, K., Dohmae, N., Fukatsu, T., Lee, B.L., 2013c. Polyester synthesis genes

292

associated with stress resistance are involved in an insect-bacterium symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

293

U. S. A. 110, E2381-2389.

294

Lemaitre, B., Hoffmann, J., 2007. The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu. Rev. Immunol.

295

25, 697-743.

296

Moreira, L.A., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Jeffery, J.A., Lu, G., Pyke, A.T., Hedges, L.M., Rocha, B.C., Hall-

297

Mendelin, S., Day, A., Riegler, M., Hugo, L.E., Johnson, K.N., Kay, B.H., McGraw, E.A., van den

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

269

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Hurk, A.F., Ryan, P.A., O'Neill, S.L., 2009. A Wolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti limits infection

299

with dengue, Chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell 139, 1268-1278.

300

Rances, E., Ye, Y.H., Woolfit, M., McGraw, E.A., O'Neill, S.L., 2012. The relative importance of

301

innate immune priming in Wolbachia-mediated dengue interference. PLoS Pathog 8, e1002548.

302

Round, J.L., Mazmanian, S.K., 2009. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during

303

health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 313-323.

304

Sekirov, I., Russell, S.L., Antunes, L.C., Finlay, B.B., 2010. Gut microbiota in health and disease.

305

Physiol. Rev. 90, 859-904.

306

Sommer, F., Backhed, F., 2013. The gut microbiota--masters of host development and physiology. Nat.

307

Rev. Microbiol. 11, 227-238.

308

Walker, T., Johnson, P.H., Moreira, L.A., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Frentiu, F.D., McMeniman, C.J., Leong,

309

Y.S., Dong, Y., Axford, J., Kriesner, P., Lloyd, A.L., Ritchie, S.A., O'Neill, S.L., Hoffmann, A.A.,

310

2011. The wMel Wolbachia strain blocks dengue and invades caged Aedes aegypti populations.

311

Nature 476, 450-453.

312

Weiss, B.L., Maltz, M., Aksoy, S., 2012. Obligate symbionts activate immune system development in

313

the tsetse fly. J. Immunol. 188, 3395-3403.

314

Weiss, B.L., Wang, J., Aksoy, S., 2011. Tsetse immune system maturation requires the presence of

315

obligate symbionts in larvae. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000619.

316

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

298

Figure legends

318

Fig. 1. (A) Bean bug survival rate after bacterial challenges. The symbiotic (SYM) insects (blue line)

319

and the aposymbiotic (APO) insects (red line) were injected with E. coli cells (i) or S. aureus cells (ii)

320

and monitored for their survival. For control insect groups, the same volume of buffer was injected

321

(mock injection). For each sample group, thirty insects were monitored. (B) Bean bug survival rate

322

after bead injection and bacterial challenges. The latex bead solutions were injected to insects one day

323

prior to the E. coli (i) or S. aureus (ii) challenge to inhibit the cellular immune responses. The control

AC C

317

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 324

groups of insects were prepared by either injected bead only or bacteria only. For each sample group,

325

thirty three insects were monitored.

326 Fig. 2. (A) Antimicrobial activity of the activated hemolymphs. The E. coli-injected hemolymphs of

328

the symbiotic (SYM) and aposymbiotic (APO) insects were compared for their antimicrobial activities

329

to the E. coli cells. CFUs were normalized by hemolymph-untreated CFUs set to 100%. Means and

330

SDs are shown (n=4). (B) Expression level of AMPs. The fat bodies of the symbiotic and

331

aposymbiotic insects were collected to measure the expression of riptocin (i), rip-defensin (ii) and rip-

332

thanatins (iii) at 17 h post injection with buffer, E. coli cells or S. aureus cells. The expression level

333

was normalized by the comparative CT (∆∆CT) method using EF1α as a reference gene. Columns and

334

bars indicate means and SDs (n = 3). Statistically significant differences between the symbiotic and

335

aposymbitotic insects were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s correction (NS, not

336

significant; ***, P < 0.0001).

AC C

EP

TE D

337

M AN U

SC

RI PT

327

14

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

Supplementary Fig. S1. Bacterial phagocytosis of hemocytes of bead-injected or noneinjected insects. Adult Riptortus was either none-injected or bead-injected (FluoSpheres® Fluorescent Microspheres, 3.6×1010 beads per insect). After 12 h initial bead-injection, FITClabelled bacteria (approximately, 2 x 107 bacteria cells per insect) were injected to the insects. In order to examine the bacterial uptake of hemocytes, hemolymph was collected at the 3 h post injection of FITC-labelled bacteria. In contrary to the hemocytes from no-bead injected insects, the hemocytes from bead-injected insects were saturated with beads without FITClabelled bacteria.