Vol.39,No.2,
1970
BlOCHEMlCAlANDBlOPHYSlCALRESEARCH
COMMUNICATIONS
CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PRIYING OF DNA SYNTHESIS
IN ISOLATED RAT LIVER iilUCLEI* Leigh
A. Burgoyne,
School
M. Anwar Waqar and Maurice
R. Atkinson
of Biological Sciences, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042.
Received March 2, 1970 SUMMARY : Nuclei isolated from rat liver in the absence of Ca2+ incorporate deoxyribonucleotides into added poly d(A-T) but not into their nuclear DNA, which is of high molecular weight. On exposure to Ca2+ the nuclear DNA is nicked and then serves as primer for incorporation of deoxyribonucleotides, in the presence of Mg2+, through the action of nuclear DNA polymerase. Incorporation of the chain-terminating arabinosyl analog araCMPI is a measure of Ca2+-dependent production of DNA primer sites in nuclei. Although (cf.
1,2)
little which
known of the
nuclear nuclei
that
from
Escherichia
3'-hydroxyl
primer
DiJA replication primer that
is
ends
are
is
unable
ed in a Ca2+-dependent
of studies
control
controlled
now being
prepared
from
were
homogenized
adult
to initiate
A - 1.37
nick
their
that
the Dp+A and
describes
until
at nicks,
The possibility that
report
DNA synthesis
(3-8), and repair.
I)NA synthesis
IXA (9).
This
nuclei
isolation
of
DNA has been nick-
reaction.
chloride,
pH 7.4)
rat
(10)
liver
rapidly
EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA/g Buffer
isolated
by endonucleases studied.
DNA polymerases
DijA replication
initiates
ends in duplex
- Isolation, washing --of Nuclei (GO mM KCl, 15 mM NaCl, 0.15 mM spermine, 15 mM tris
in
nuclear coli
Isolation etnanol,
of nuclear
incorporation
factors
D1\IA polymerase provide
generate
have been a number
and of deoxyribonucleotide
is
Purified
there
in at least
of liver
M sucrose,
and assay were 0.5
with
with
the
carried
mM spermidine,
additions follo\!ing
7 ml of Buffer
and the homogenate
out in Buffer 15 mM 2-mercapto-
as indicated.
Nuclei
modifications. A - 0.34
was layered
Livers
M sucrose, on 0.33
1 mM EDTA, 0.25 mM EGTA and centrifuged
were
2 mM
volumes for
sucrose,
of
15 min
at 16,000 g. buffer
P
The nuclear pellet was dispersed in 7 volumes of Buffer A - 2.4 M 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, layered over an equal volume of the same
and centrifuged
for
45 min at 75,000
* This work Committee
g.
After
one wash in Buffer
A -
was supported by grants from the Australian Research Grants and the University of Adelaide Anti-Cancer Foundation. analogs of CMP and CTP; EGTA : ethylene ' araCMP, araCTP : arabinofuranosyl glycol-bis-(2-aminoethyl ether)-N,N'-tetraacetic acid. 254
Vol.
No.2,1970
BIOCHEMICAL
40
20
RO
40
60
AND BIOPHYSICALRESEARCH
-
50
-
COMMUNICATIONS
Minutes
50
Minutes
Minutes
Figure 1. All assays were in 50 ul of Buffer A - 0.34 enol pyruvate, 0.4 mM ATP with nucleotides as indicated. and incorporation of 32 P into DNA was measured by scintillation addition of 10 ~1 of 10 mM EDTA, 1.8 M KOH and removal of by washing on paper discs with 10% CC1 COOH; 5 times with CC13COOH, 1.5 mM KH2P04; and twice WI4 h ethanol.
100
100
\1 sucrose, 2 mM phosphoIncubations were at 37O counting after acid-soluble material 0.25 Y Na2S04, 5%
A. Nuclei (5.0 x 106/assay) in assay solution with 1 r\l EDTA 0 2 mM E TA, 10 mM MgC12, 0.4 mM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and 16 UM a- 3yP-dTTP'(4:0 x log cpm/umole): t, no additions; 1 mM CaC12 at zero time.
Q,
+ poly
d(A-T),
90 url in residues;
+-,
4 mM each of dl\.TP, dGTP, and dTTP; Q, + .-32P-dTTP + 0.4 mM Activated nuclei (2:8 x 105/assay in assay solution with 1 mM EDTA, EGTA, 10 mM MgCl2: +, + 27 UM a- 3*P-dTTP (2.7 x 109 cpm/vmole); 0, P-dTTP and 0.4 mM each of dATP, dCTP and dGTP. Activated nuclei (8 x 105/assay) in assay solution with 1 mM EDTA, 0. mM EGTA, 10 mM MgC12, 0.4 mM each of dA P, dGTP and dTTP: a, + 3.2 PM a- i' *P-araCTP (1.2 x 109cpm/umole); 0, + '5*P-araCTP and 1 mM CaC12.
255
+
Vol.39,No.2,
3.34
M sucrose
persed where
1970
for
BlOCHEMlCALANDBlOPHYSlCALRESEARCHCOMMUNlCATlONS
by centrifuging
assay
indicated, for
were
washed
--Results tained
an active
dGTP,
.-32 P-dTTP
In these
g, the nuclei
(2 ml/liver).
Nuclei
were
were
dis-
activated,
in Cuffer A - 0.34 :I sucrose, 1 mM CaC12, 5 mF1 Ca2+ and Fig2+ were then removed by centrifuging of suffer A - 1.0 V sucrose, 2 mtl EDTA, 0.5 tnfl EGTA. The
10 min.
and w-suspended
and Discussion
Nearest-neighbor shown),
in the same solution
an underlay
nuclei
15 min at 16,030
by suspending
MgC12 at 0-2O through
for
conditions but with
- Nuclei
in Buffer isolated
in
F. - 0.34 (Ca2+,
:I sucrose.
11g2+) - free
solutions
con-
UijA polymerase when assayed with poly d(D-T), df,TP, dCTP, 2+ , with EGTA to selectively chelate Ca 2t (Fig. IA). analysis showed all label in alternating d(A-T) copolymer.
and Mg
added no added
calf primer
thymus
Dl!A also
CNA synthesis
served
as primer
was at tne limit
(results
not
of detection
I -
Figure 2. Nuclei (3 x 106/assay) in 100 ~1 of assay solution as for F' l9 with 1 mM CaCl 9 mM MgCl 0.4 mM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP and 18 UM U- 39 P-dTTP Af%r incubation at 37O for the number of minutes indi(1.7 x log cpm?imole). cated by the nunbers on the curves, reactions were stopped with 20 ,,I of 10 mM EDTA, 1.8 M KOH and loaded on a 5 ml alkaline sucrose gradient (17). Afte-r centrifuging for 17 hr at loo and 36,000 r.p.m. in an M.S.E. SW-40 rotor, 7 drop fractions were collected and acid-insoluble radioactivity (A) or total DNA (B; The pellet ("fraction 0") contained almost all the DNA in ref. 18) measured. the zero-time sample. 256
Vol. 39,No.2,
(Fig. out
IA).
primer
that
la).
its
high
nuclei
assayed
with
of label
phosphates
dGTP and dTTP,
and at least
iiearest-neignbor
analysis
possible
primer increases
were: ApA, 3.033 O.G38 to 3.X6 would
give
(13).
as the only
substrate,
the
in Fig.
resu?ts
significantly cate
little
activated
if
former
for
results
nicks
araCTP.
tor
arabinosyl
residues bacterial
with
DfJase, and hydrolysis
attacilment
to all
as sole
labeled
of endogenous
sequences TpT,
(cf.
ref.
1)
deoxyribonucleotides
nucleotides.
endogenous
4
substrate
to U.051;
transferase
single
is
dCTP,
nucleotide.
adjacent
GpG, 0.037
terminal
synthesis
dATP,
to
of homodinucleotide
to 0.383;
that
from
triphospnate
frequencies
1.3 with
tri-
Di;A could all
the corresponding
labeled
incorpor-
unlabeled
endogenous
however,
nucleotides
The nearest-neighbor
primer
is extensive
from
contribute
analyses
due to terminal
therefore
indi-
transferase.
In the presence
tenini.
incorporation
consistent
inhibitor
cytosine
with
of dTMP (Fig.
a model
DtiA and provides
DTiA synthesis.
Further
to terminal
(cf.
15) sources.
support
iiuclei incorto
of added
IC),
d,lTP,
well
beyond
a Ca 2+ -dependent
endo-
terminator
3) showed
that
label
ed nuclei
(Fig.
28;
(15).
on D!aA with
polymerase
did not label after partial
Centrifugation time)
to nuclear
to "titration"
of from
product
(Fig.
(14)
nuclei by brief
that
and to a expos-
extent
primer
sucrose
inhibiaraCVP
animal
DiJA to a limited
between
studies
the growth
transferring
unactivated activation
in an alkaline intermediate
to account
came from
of a17 available
and the smaller
257
termini
model
terminator,
was in DNA of a size zero
this
a metabolite
to Ca*+ , araCMP was attached corresponding
for
is
u-32P-AraCTP above background, ':ut
lD), probably
3'-hydroxyl
chain
an effective
positions
in which
enough
of DNA synthesis
and is
mainly significantly
chain
tire
unlikely
available
the nuclear This
ure of nuclei (Fig.
of tne three
and
DNA nicking during brief exposure to Ca 2t (Fig. lC), 32 P-dTTP alone, up to a limit probably corresponding
are
the observed
with
level
there
of label
limit.
These nuclease
is
in
covalent
absence
any of the
at all
dCTP and dGTP, the
IJith
in the
from
dTrlP attachment
shorted
approaching
by limited 32P-dT?lP,
incorporation
Labeled
araCTP
Template-independent
it
with-
during isolation 2+ and Ilg inediate
by pancreatic
CpC, 0.3Gg
lC,
initiated
DiM.
?5% of the a- 32P label
855 from
to DirA synthesis.
that
porate
products
(13).
frequencies
bulk
Gmission
in nearest-neigtibor to O.iI81;
and that
2-3 fold.
at least (12)
termini
13).
rates
to acid-soluble showed
23)
triphosphates
(Fig.
labeling
(11)
was immediately
the median
deoxyribonucleoside
5' nucleotides
COMMUNICATIONS
to 1 ml? CaC12, 5 rnli QC12
was observed
apparent
(Fig.
2A) than
exposed
decreased
be hydrolyzed
DMA synthesis
value
(Fig.
were
ANDBIOPHYSICALRESEARCH
Centrifugation in an alkaline sucrose gradient 2+ of Ca continuous nicking decreased the size of
initial
DliA smaller
Mien ation
(Fig.
in the presence
UI~A from
was into then
BIOCHEMICAL
When CaC12 was added,
added
showed the
1970
gradient from
3) resulting
termini (Fig. unactivatfrom
Vol. 39, No. 2, 1970
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BlOPHYSlCAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
3
6 Fraction
9
12
Number
Figure 3. Activated nuclei (7.9 x lO'/assay) incubated for 45 min in 100 ~1 assay solution (Fig. 11) with MgC12, EDTA, EGTA, dATP, dGTP, dTTP and 23 u;I a-32P-araCTP (2.0 x 10 cpm/umole). Distributions of radioactivity (A) and DNA (B), after centrifuging for 14 nr in the alkaline su rose gradient, were measured as in Fig. 2: +, incubation with no added Ca ii+ ; Q=, with 1 mH CaC12.
extensive
labeling
in
the presence
each case incorporation primer
sites by nicking of nuclear Our experiments do not prove
is
involved
that
this
in physiological ef$ect
DNA synthesis DNA replication
must
--in vivo (16).
of U- 32P-araCTP
of araCMP is a measure
and CaC12 (Figs. 1B & D). In 2+ of Ca -dependent production of
DNA. that the Ca2' -dependent
initiation
be considered and in particular
of DNA replication, in any search for
H.M.,
Progr.
Nucleic~Acid
Res. w.
258
for
N.,
but
factors
endonucleases
The authors acknowledge the technical assistance Mr Mario Froscio and the provision of arabinosyl References 1. Keir,
priming
that
of nuclear they
that
do indicate
control
nuclear
may be involved
of Mrs Donna Staunton cytosine by Dr. W.J.
-,4
DNA
81 (1965).
and Hechter.
in
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 39, No. 2, 1970
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Biophys., 133, 238 (1369). Hawk, R., and Wang, T.Y , Arch. Biochem. Biochem. Bi Res. Comn., 21, 235 Brewer, E.N., and Rusch, H, ichim, Siophys. AZ 16T; 455 f D.L., and Muel 'ler, G.m 43: Friedman, 28,(1969). -DeBellis, R.H. ,, Federat ;i on Proc., 2: Thompson, L.R. ,, and Carthy,B.J.TB iochem. Bioohvs. Fes. Comm.. 30. E.A., h,wanJ-?Uiiiiii R.X; 7. Erhan, S., Reisher, S., Franko,
2.
(1965) * 1968). 166 (1968). ilature,
225-, j40 (1970). a. Lagunoff 1 ;. ’ Qf&;e~3E+~ ;o~~9;;) (1969). 9. Kornbero T. . ' . 75.. Science. i54, 1662 (1966). 10. Blobel,-G., an-i, Korib?rg; A., J. Biol. elm., 11. Lehman, I.R., Bessman, M.J.,sS~~S?&d 233, 163 (1958). s., z, 864 (1961). 12. Jesse, J., Kaiser, P.D., and Kornberg, R., J -. -Biol. 13. Waqar, N.A., Burgoyne, and Ptkinson ? R L.A., , '/. ., unpublished results. 14. Momparler, R.L., Biochem. Bio;hys. p,eS. a., 34-, 465 (1969). M.R., D&tsr, M. ., Kornberg, A., Russell, A.F., and Iloffatt, 15. Atkinson, 16. ;1,~~~l~aD~~e~7C(:g69~Foc 17. Olivera: B.M: 1 and Lehman:
ia.
Burton,
K.,
Biochem.
J.,
I:R:: Proc. 62-, 315 m6).'
259
'iatl &'
Acad m' -*
Sci m' --*
U S ti' &"
64 n' -'
1065 (l969) 1426 (IPG7):