- Email: [email protected]
Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation
Arthroplasty Today xxx (2016) 1e5
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Arthroplasty Today journal homepage: http://www.arthroplastytoday.org/
Case report
Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation Christopher Joyce, MD a, Jared L. Harwood, MD b, Andrew H. Glassman, MD, MS b, * a b
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history: Received 13 September 2016 Accepted 16 September 2016 Available online xxx
In our case study, we examine a case of catastrophic failure of a total hip arthroplasty acetabular component leading to complete central wear by the ceramic femoral head, requiring revision total hip arthroplasty. Despite subtle clinical findings, initial orthopaedic evaluation and treatment yielded a diagnosis of total hip arthroplasty dislocation. While a much more common phenomenon, the diagnosis led to futile initial attempts at closed reduction. Our index of suspicion must remain high to pick up on subtle, less common diagnoses we will encounter. © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Total hip replacement Acetabular component Dislocation Ceramic femoral head Revision surgery Retrieval analysis
Introduction Hip dislocation after total hip arthroplasty offers several challenges to the total joint surgeon. When using a posterior approach to the hip, the vast majority of postoperative dislocations occur posteriorly with an overall rate ranging from 1.1% to 4.76% in the literature [1-5]. Most dislocations warrant an attempted closed reduction in the emergency room. However, in this case, a thoughtful analysis of the presenting radiographs should have lead one to conclude that such an attempt would be futile. Detailed surgical planning is a necessary component to any revision case. Bone loss must be assessed for both the acetabular and femoral components, as this will affect what tools need to be available and what options exist for reconstruction. A full set of plain films must be obtained. Sometimes, a computed tomography
The authors received no funding for this study and report no conflicts of interest. One or more of the authors of this paper have disclosed potential or pertinent conflicts of interest, which may include receipt of payment, either direct or indirect, institutional support, or association with an entity in the biomedical field which may be perceived to have potential conflict of interest with this work. For full disclosure statements refer to http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010. * Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 725 Prior Hall, 376 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Tel.: þ1 614 293 6194. E-mail address: [email protected]
scan is useful in evaluating the extent of osteolysis. Laboratory workup should include complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) with an aspiration if results are consistent with infection. When all these details are obtained, things do not always unfold as expected. The following is one such case we encountered. The patient was advised that details of the case would be submitted for publication and provided informed consent. Case history A 50-year-old man initially presented to our emergency department in November 2012 complaining of right hip pain with a 1-month inability to ambulate without crutches on the right lower extremity. The patient denied any trauma but did have multiple sclerosis with periodic falls from standing. The patient had undergone staged bilateral total hip arthroplasties at an outside institution for steroid-induced avascular necrosis. The patient had been on disability since 2005 secondary to his hip complaints and back issues that had also been addressed with surgery. His left total hip arthroplasty was performed in 2008 and the right in 2009. Both procedures were reportedly uncomplicated with satisfactory postoperative recovery. His past medical history also included multiple sclerosis, juvenile dermatomyositis, migraines, and depression. Additional surgical history included lumbar spine fusion. The patient complained of persistent pain in the right hip associated with decreased range of motion and noise from the hip
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010 2352-3441/© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NCND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Please cite this article in press as: C. Joyce, et al., Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation, Arthroplasty Today (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010
2
C. Joyce et al. / Arthroplasty Today xxx (2016) 1e5
Figure 1. AP pelvis (a) and lateral right hip (b) radiographs taken during initial emergency room visit. Radiologist read as anterior dislocation of femoral head component from the acetabular component. The radiologist also noted ill-defined lucency (c) about the femoral and acetabular components possibly reflecting underlying particle disease.
that had been gradually increasing. Plain radiographs taken in the emergency department demonstrated findings that were interpreted as a dislocation of the femoral head component as seen in Figure 1. There was concern for anterior dislocation of the femoral component. Orthopaedics was consulted, and the patient was seen and evaluated by a junior resident after hours. The patient subsequently underwent 2 unsuccessful attempts at closed reduction under intravenous sedation in the emergency department. In addition, the patient's ESR and CRP were elevated, so preparations were made for hip aspiration and open reduction in the operating room. However, the patient left the hospital against medical advice before the procedures. He had undergone a recent aspiration at an outside hospital that was reportedly negative. One month later, the patient presented to our outpatient clinic with persistent right hip pain radiating to the right foot. He was
evaluated by the senior author. Radiographs taken in the office were interpreted as persistent right hip dislocation and stable periprosthetic lucency. It was recognized that the patient had central wear-through of the acetabular shell, as this was the only possible explanation for the femoral neck being superimposed on the socket in both AP and lateral views. Concern for infection was high due to elevated ESR and CRP, so the patient was advised to undergo hip aspiration. The aspiration showed no growth, and the decision to proceed with operative treatment was made. In the time between the patient's initial evaluation and surgery, he sustained a fall from standing resulting in a right hip intertrochanteric periprosthetic fracture as seen in Figure 2. The patient underwent operative revision of the right total hip arthroplasty roughly 10 months after the initial emergency room visit via posterolateral approach. Intraoperatively, we encountered
Figure 2. AP right hip (a) and lateral right hip (b) radiographs taken at the patient's initial clinic visit. The patient had fallen from standing height intervally. Radiographs demonstrate persistent right hip dislocation and stable lucency around the acetabular and femoral components, along with a new right greater trochanteric fracture that went onto nonunion.
Please cite this article in press as: C. Joyce, et al., Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation, Arthroplasty Today (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010
C. Joyce et al. / Arthroplasty Today xxx (2016) 1e5
3
with a walker for 100 feet, and comfortably sit in a chair. He was discharged to an extended care facility on the third postoperative day. Discussion
Figure 3. Approximately 10 months after initial presentation, the patient underwent a revision total hip arthroplasty. Intraoperative photograph of the acetabular cup with a large central dome defect where the ceramic femoral head bore through. Extensive metallosis is also noted in surrounding tissue.
the polyethylene liner immediately deep to the fascia and completely displaced from the acetabular cup. The polyethylene showed significant wear. There were copious amounts of black metallosis-stained tissue within the joint and in surrounding tissue with concomitant soft tissue reaction. After extensive debridement of the black tissue, the intertrochanteric fracture was found to be malunited. At this point, the approach was converted to a sliding trochanteric osteotomy for adequate exposure. On exposing the hip joint, it was discovered that the ceramic head of the femoral component had worn completely through the central dome of the acetabular component, leaving a hole in the acetabular component as demonstrated in Figure 3. The ceramic femoral head, polyethylene acetabular liner, and acetabular components were removed (Fig. 4). The patient's bony acetabulum was significantly expanded and demonstrated a large central defect, most consistent with Paprosky type 2A bone stock damage. This was filled with fresh crushed cancellous bone. The acetabulum was reamed and fitted with a new acetabular component fixed with adjunctive dome screws. A new polyethylene liner was placed in the acetabular shell, and a cobaltechromium head was press fitted onto the trunnion of the retained, original femoral component (Fig. 5). The patient had excellent stability with the new implants, although he still had roughly 10 -15 of residual flexion contracture. The patient recovered well postoperatively in the hospital. He worked with physical therapy daily and was able to ambulate
Femoral component dislocation is a common complication of total hip arthroplasty, especially in the early postoperative period. The overall dislocation rate after primary total hip arthroplasty has been cited at 1.1%-4.76% with the majority occurring in the early postoperative period [1-5]. A study by Phillips et al. [2] looked at complications in the first 6 months postoperatively and found an overall dislocation rate of 3.9% with 3% occurring in the first 8 weeks after surgery. In addition, a long-term analysis of Medicare patients from 1998 to 2007 by Malkani et al. [4] found a dislocation rate of 3.84% in the first 2 years postoperative and 0.92% from years 2 to 10. While dislocation continues to be a major concern in total hip arthroplasties, the incidence of chronic dislocated prosthesis is rare. A comprehensive review of the literature was performed, and 7 reports of chronic hip prosthetic dislocations were discovered [6-12]. In 2 cases, the patients had no associated pain and were treated without intervention [8,11]. One patient underwent successful open reduction with soft tissue closure [12], and another with a revision total hip replacement [9]. In 1 case, the femoral component eroded through skin, and the component was removed and the patient followed [7]. One patient was successfully treated with an adjustable external fixator [6]. There was 1 case in the literature that described a dislodged polyethylene liner leading to erosion of the acetabular component by a cobaltechromium femoral head and extensive metallosis of the surrounding tissue, which was treated with total hip revision [10]. To our knowledge, the case we described is the first case reported of a ceramic head completely wearing through the acetabular cup with resulting central dislocation. In this particular case, the likely precipitating event for central dislocation was failure of the locking mechanism of the polyethylene liner, resulting in direct contact between the ceramic head and metal acetabular cup. There are several case reports in the literature describing failure of the polyethylene liner requiring revision surgery. Binda et al. [13] presented a case of a polyethylene liner dislodging in an S-ROM Oblong Cup System (DePuy, Warsaw, IN). On evaluation of the components, irregular wear at the locking slot sites was noticed. A similar case was described by Mesko with dissociation of the polyethylene liner from a Pinnacle (DePuy, Warsaw, IN) acetabular cup. Evaluation of the liner intraoperatively revealed shearing of 3 of the 6 peripheral locking tabs [14]. As this is a rare occurrence, there is
Figure 4. Photograph of titanium acetabular cup (a), ceramic femoral head, and fragmented acetabular polyethylene liner (b) after hardware removal.
Please cite this article in press as: C. Joyce, et al., Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation, Arthroplasty Today (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010
4
C. Joyce et al. / Arthroplasty Today xxx (2016) 1e5
Figure 5. Postoperative radiographs ([a] AP pelvis and [b] AP right hip) demonstrate a stable revision total hip arthroplasty construct in which the acetabular cup, liner, and femoral head components were removed and replaced. Two dome screws were placed after 30-cc fresh crushed cancellous bone was used to fill the patient's central dome defect and 10 cc of human demineralized allogenic bone matrix putty was used for the defects in the proximal femur.
not much discussion of locking mechanism failures of polyethylene liners in the literature. It is unclear what the ultimate cause of the failure is related to a defect in the material, positioning of the components, or patient mobility. It is important to be aware of the possibility of a polyethylene liner dislocation in cases with malpositioned femoral head or persistent hip pain or mechanical symptoms because the liner is radiolucent. There are many proposed risk factors for dislocation of a total hip arthroplasty, including neuromuscular and cognitive disorders, patient noncompliance, previous hip surgery, posterior surgical approach, surgeon experience, and component selection [15]. A systematic review analyzing risk factors for primary total hip revisions found evidence for an increased incidence of revision surgery for dislocation in elderly patients, rheumatoid arthritis, femoral head components 28 mm, and posterior surgical approach [16]. In addition, a matched-pair analysis by Meftah et al. [17] demonstrated that ceramic femoral head components have a significantly lower wear rate when compared with cobaltechromium metal heads. One risk factor for failure of the prosthesis and dislocation is the fact that this patient's indication for the procedure was avascular necrosis of the femoral heads bilaterally, which has been shown to have an increase in dislocation rate postoperatively [18]. Looking at our case, 1 additional potential risk factor that this patient had was noncompliance; however, as this case does not represent a typical dislocation, it is difficult to draw conclusions about why it occurred. Summary The typical treatment protocol for prosthetic hip dislocation is to first attempt closed reduction under neuromuscular relaxation with local or general anesthesia. If unsuccessful, the underlying etiology of the dislocation must be obtained and treated appropriately, frequently with surgical revision [15]. In this case, closed reduction was attempted twice unsuccessfully before consenting the patient for surgery, which followed standard treatment protocols. While total hip arthroplasty dislocation is relatively uncommon, it is a diagnosis that will be encountered with some frequency by many orthopaedic surgeons; catastrophic failure is
rare and requires a high index of suspicion. In retrospect, it is clear that our patient's hip was not dislocated anteriorly as suspected, seen most clearly on the lateral radiographs. Radiographic recognition of a central wear through the acetabular component could have prevented futile closed reduction maneuvers and confirmed the need to proceed with operative revision total hip arthroplasty. By discussing total hip arthroplasty dislocation in the setting of our patient's catastrophic failure, we hope that readers will be more adept at evaluating and treating both. Acknowledgments The authors thank M.M. Manring for his help in reviewing this article. References [1] Leichtle UG, Leichtle CI, Taslaci F, Reize P, Wunschel M. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: risk factors and treatment options. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2013;47(2):96. [2] Phillips CB, Barrett JA, Losina E, et al. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A(1):20. [3] Morrey BF. Instability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1992;23(2):237. [4] Malkani AL, Ong KL, Lau E, et al. Early- and late-term dislocation risk after primary hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty 2010;25(6 Suppl):21. [5] Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64(9):1295. [6] Butler RA, Hsu JR, Barrack RL. Use of an Ilizarov apparatus to perform closed reduction of chronic proximal dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(2):411. [7] Kadar A, Gigi R, Chechik O. Protrusion of an artificial femoral head: a rare complication of chronic dislocation of the prosthetic hip. J Arthroplasty 2013;28(2):374.e17. [8] Kindsfater KA, Bureau CA, Sherman CM. Unrecognized acetabular component rotation with formation of pseudoarticulation after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25(3):498.e11. [9] Lidder S, Ranawat VS, Ranawat NS, Thomas TL. Chronic asymptomatic dislocation of a total hip replacement: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2009;3:8956. [10] Mohammed R, Cnudde P. Severe metallosis owing to intraprosthetic dislocation in a failed dual-mobility cup primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27(3):493.e1. [11] Nellensteijn JM, Nellensteijn DR, De Jong T. Case report: Painless chronic liner dissociation of a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471(6):1769.
Please cite this article in press as: C. Joyce, et al., Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation, Arthroplasty Today (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010
C. Joyce et al. / Arthroplasty Today xxx (2016) 1e5 [12] Suh KT, Moon KP, Kim IB, Lee JS. Open reduction of a chronic proximal dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008;23(5):790. [13] Binda HP, Sarkar SP. Dissociation of the S-ROM* metal-backed polyethylene acetabular linerda case report and literature review. Acta Orthop Belg 2003;69(1):86. [14] Mesko JW. Acute liner dissociation of a Pinnacle acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 2009;24(5):815. [15] Soong M, Rubash HE, Macaulay W. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004;12(5):314.
5
[16] Prokopetz JJ, Losina E, Bliss RL, et al. Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disor 2012;13:251. [17] Meftah M, Klingenstein GG, Yun RJ, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Long-term performance of ceramic and metal femoral heads on conventional polyethylene in young and active patients: a matched-pair analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95(13):1193. [18] Conroy JL, Whitehouse SL, Graves SE, et al. Risk factors for revision for early dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008;23(6):867.
Please cite this article in press as: C. Joyce, et al., Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation, Arthroplasty Today (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Arthroplasty Today journal homepage: http://www.arthroplastytoday.org/
Case report
Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation Christopher Joyce, MD a, Jared L. Harwood, MD b, Andrew H. Glassman, MD, MS b, * a b
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history: Received 13 September 2016 Accepted 16 September 2016 Available online xxx
In our case study, we examine a case of catastrophic failure of a total hip arthroplasty acetabular component leading to complete central wear by the ceramic femoral head, requiring revision total hip arthroplasty. Despite subtle clinical findings, initial orthopaedic evaluation and treatment yielded a diagnosis of total hip arthroplasty dislocation. While a much more common phenomenon, the diagnosis led to futile initial attempts at closed reduction. Our index of suspicion must remain high to pick up on subtle, less common diagnoses we will encounter. © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Total hip replacement Acetabular component Dislocation Ceramic femoral head Revision surgery Retrieval analysis
Introduction Hip dislocation after total hip arthroplasty offers several challenges to the total joint surgeon. When using a posterior approach to the hip, the vast majority of postoperative dislocations occur posteriorly with an overall rate ranging from 1.1% to 4.76% in the literature [1-5]. Most dislocations warrant an attempted closed reduction in the emergency room. However, in this case, a thoughtful analysis of the presenting radiographs should have lead one to conclude that such an attempt would be futile. Detailed surgical planning is a necessary component to any revision case. Bone loss must be assessed for both the acetabular and femoral components, as this will affect what tools need to be available and what options exist for reconstruction. A full set of plain films must be obtained. Sometimes, a computed tomography
The authors received no funding for this study and report no conflicts of interest. One or more of the authors of this paper have disclosed potential or pertinent conflicts of interest, which may include receipt of payment, either direct or indirect, institutional support, or association with an entity in the biomedical field which may be perceived to have potential conflict of interest with this work. For full disclosure statements refer to http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010. * Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 725 Prior Hall, 376 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Tel.: þ1 614 293 6194. E-mail address: [email protected]
scan is useful in evaluating the extent of osteolysis. Laboratory workup should include complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) with an aspiration if results are consistent with infection. When all these details are obtained, things do not always unfold as expected. The following is one such case we encountered. The patient was advised that details of the case would be submitted for publication and provided informed consent. Case history A 50-year-old man initially presented to our emergency department in November 2012 complaining of right hip pain with a 1-month inability to ambulate without crutches on the right lower extremity. The patient denied any trauma but did have multiple sclerosis with periodic falls from standing. The patient had undergone staged bilateral total hip arthroplasties at an outside institution for steroid-induced avascular necrosis. The patient had been on disability since 2005 secondary to his hip complaints and back issues that had also been addressed with surgery. His left total hip arthroplasty was performed in 2008 and the right in 2009. Both procedures were reportedly uncomplicated with satisfactory postoperative recovery. His past medical history also included multiple sclerosis, juvenile dermatomyositis, migraines, and depression. Additional surgical history included lumbar spine fusion. The patient complained of persistent pain in the right hip associated with decreased range of motion and noise from the hip
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010 2352-3441/© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NCND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Please cite this article in press as: C. Joyce, et al., Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation, Arthroplasty Today (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010
2
C. Joyce et al. / Arthroplasty Today xxx (2016) 1e5
Figure 1. AP pelvis (a) and lateral right hip (b) radiographs taken during initial emergency room visit. Radiologist read as anterior dislocation of femoral head component from the acetabular component. The radiologist also noted ill-defined lucency (c) about the femoral and acetabular components possibly reflecting underlying particle disease.
that had been gradually increasing. Plain radiographs taken in the emergency department demonstrated findings that were interpreted as a dislocation of the femoral head component as seen in Figure 1. There was concern for anterior dislocation of the femoral component. Orthopaedics was consulted, and the patient was seen and evaluated by a junior resident after hours. The patient subsequently underwent 2 unsuccessful attempts at closed reduction under intravenous sedation in the emergency department. In addition, the patient's ESR and CRP were elevated, so preparations were made for hip aspiration and open reduction in the operating room. However, the patient left the hospital against medical advice before the procedures. He had undergone a recent aspiration at an outside hospital that was reportedly negative. One month later, the patient presented to our outpatient clinic with persistent right hip pain radiating to the right foot. He was
evaluated by the senior author. Radiographs taken in the office were interpreted as persistent right hip dislocation and stable periprosthetic lucency. It was recognized that the patient had central wear-through of the acetabular shell, as this was the only possible explanation for the femoral neck being superimposed on the socket in both AP and lateral views. Concern for infection was high due to elevated ESR and CRP, so the patient was advised to undergo hip aspiration. The aspiration showed no growth, and the decision to proceed with operative treatment was made. In the time between the patient's initial evaluation and surgery, he sustained a fall from standing resulting in a right hip intertrochanteric periprosthetic fracture as seen in Figure 2. The patient underwent operative revision of the right total hip arthroplasty roughly 10 months after the initial emergency room visit via posterolateral approach. Intraoperatively, we encountered
Figure 2. AP right hip (a) and lateral right hip (b) radiographs taken at the patient's initial clinic visit. The patient had fallen from standing height intervally. Radiographs demonstrate persistent right hip dislocation and stable lucency around the acetabular and femoral components, along with a new right greater trochanteric fracture that went onto nonunion.
Please cite this article in press as: C. Joyce, et al., Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation, Arthroplasty Today (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010
C. Joyce et al. / Arthroplasty Today xxx (2016) 1e5
3
with a walker for 100 feet, and comfortably sit in a chair. He was discharged to an extended care facility on the third postoperative day. Discussion
Figure 3. Approximately 10 months after initial presentation, the patient underwent a revision total hip arthroplasty. Intraoperative photograph of the acetabular cup with a large central dome defect where the ceramic femoral head bore through. Extensive metallosis is also noted in surrounding tissue.
the polyethylene liner immediately deep to the fascia and completely displaced from the acetabular cup. The polyethylene showed significant wear. There were copious amounts of black metallosis-stained tissue within the joint and in surrounding tissue with concomitant soft tissue reaction. After extensive debridement of the black tissue, the intertrochanteric fracture was found to be malunited. At this point, the approach was converted to a sliding trochanteric osteotomy for adequate exposure. On exposing the hip joint, it was discovered that the ceramic head of the femoral component had worn completely through the central dome of the acetabular component, leaving a hole in the acetabular component as demonstrated in Figure 3. The ceramic femoral head, polyethylene acetabular liner, and acetabular components were removed (Fig. 4). The patient's bony acetabulum was significantly expanded and demonstrated a large central defect, most consistent with Paprosky type 2A bone stock damage. This was filled with fresh crushed cancellous bone. The acetabulum was reamed and fitted with a new acetabular component fixed with adjunctive dome screws. A new polyethylene liner was placed in the acetabular shell, and a cobaltechromium head was press fitted onto the trunnion of the retained, original femoral component (Fig. 5). The patient had excellent stability with the new implants, although he still had roughly 10 -15 of residual flexion contracture. The patient recovered well postoperatively in the hospital. He worked with physical therapy daily and was able to ambulate
Femoral component dislocation is a common complication of total hip arthroplasty, especially in the early postoperative period. The overall dislocation rate after primary total hip arthroplasty has been cited at 1.1%-4.76% with the majority occurring in the early postoperative period [1-5]. A study by Phillips et al. [2] looked at complications in the first 6 months postoperatively and found an overall dislocation rate of 3.9% with 3% occurring in the first 8 weeks after surgery. In addition, a long-term analysis of Medicare patients from 1998 to 2007 by Malkani et al. [4] found a dislocation rate of 3.84% in the first 2 years postoperative and 0.92% from years 2 to 10. While dislocation continues to be a major concern in total hip arthroplasties, the incidence of chronic dislocated prosthesis is rare. A comprehensive review of the literature was performed, and 7 reports of chronic hip prosthetic dislocations were discovered [6-12]. In 2 cases, the patients had no associated pain and were treated without intervention [8,11]. One patient underwent successful open reduction with soft tissue closure [12], and another with a revision total hip replacement [9]. In 1 case, the femoral component eroded through skin, and the component was removed and the patient followed [7]. One patient was successfully treated with an adjustable external fixator [6]. There was 1 case in the literature that described a dislodged polyethylene liner leading to erosion of the acetabular component by a cobaltechromium femoral head and extensive metallosis of the surrounding tissue, which was treated with total hip revision [10]. To our knowledge, the case we described is the first case reported of a ceramic head completely wearing through the acetabular cup with resulting central dislocation. In this particular case, the likely precipitating event for central dislocation was failure of the locking mechanism of the polyethylene liner, resulting in direct contact between the ceramic head and metal acetabular cup. There are several case reports in the literature describing failure of the polyethylene liner requiring revision surgery. Binda et al. [13] presented a case of a polyethylene liner dislodging in an S-ROM Oblong Cup System (DePuy, Warsaw, IN). On evaluation of the components, irregular wear at the locking slot sites was noticed. A similar case was described by Mesko with dissociation of the polyethylene liner from a Pinnacle (DePuy, Warsaw, IN) acetabular cup. Evaluation of the liner intraoperatively revealed shearing of 3 of the 6 peripheral locking tabs [14]. As this is a rare occurrence, there is
Figure 4. Photograph of titanium acetabular cup (a), ceramic femoral head, and fragmented acetabular polyethylene liner (b) after hardware removal.
Please cite this article in press as: C. Joyce, et al., Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation, Arthroplasty Today (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010
4
C. Joyce et al. / Arthroplasty Today xxx (2016) 1e5
Figure 5. Postoperative radiographs ([a] AP pelvis and [b] AP right hip) demonstrate a stable revision total hip arthroplasty construct in which the acetabular cup, liner, and femoral head components were removed and replaced. Two dome screws were placed after 30-cc fresh crushed cancellous bone was used to fill the patient's central dome defect and 10 cc of human demineralized allogenic bone matrix putty was used for the defects in the proximal femur.
not much discussion of locking mechanism failures of polyethylene liners in the literature. It is unclear what the ultimate cause of the failure is related to a defect in the material, positioning of the components, or patient mobility. It is important to be aware of the possibility of a polyethylene liner dislocation in cases with malpositioned femoral head or persistent hip pain or mechanical symptoms because the liner is radiolucent. There are many proposed risk factors for dislocation of a total hip arthroplasty, including neuromuscular and cognitive disorders, patient noncompliance, previous hip surgery, posterior surgical approach, surgeon experience, and component selection [15]. A systematic review analyzing risk factors for primary total hip revisions found evidence for an increased incidence of revision surgery for dislocation in elderly patients, rheumatoid arthritis, femoral head components 28 mm, and posterior surgical approach [16]. In addition, a matched-pair analysis by Meftah et al. [17] demonstrated that ceramic femoral head components have a significantly lower wear rate when compared with cobaltechromium metal heads. One risk factor for failure of the prosthesis and dislocation is the fact that this patient's indication for the procedure was avascular necrosis of the femoral heads bilaterally, which has been shown to have an increase in dislocation rate postoperatively [18]. Looking at our case, 1 additional potential risk factor that this patient had was noncompliance; however, as this case does not represent a typical dislocation, it is difficult to draw conclusions about why it occurred. Summary The typical treatment protocol for prosthetic hip dislocation is to first attempt closed reduction under neuromuscular relaxation with local or general anesthesia. If unsuccessful, the underlying etiology of the dislocation must be obtained and treated appropriately, frequently with surgical revision [15]. In this case, closed reduction was attempted twice unsuccessfully before consenting the patient for surgery, which followed standard treatment protocols. While total hip arthroplasty dislocation is relatively uncommon, it is a diagnosis that will be encountered with some frequency by many orthopaedic surgeons; catastrophic failure is
rare and requires a high index of suspicion. In retrospect, it is clear that our patient's hip was not dislocated anteriorly as suspected, seen most clearly on the lateral radiographs. Radiographic recognition of a central wear through the acetabular component could have prevented futile closed reduction maneuvers and confirmed the need to proceed with operative revision total hip arthroplasty. By discussing total hip arthroplasty dislocation in the setting of our patient's catastrophic failure, we hope that readers will be more adept at evaluating and treating both. Acknowledgments The authors thank M.M. Manring for his help in reviewing this article. References [1] Leichtle UG, Leichtle CI, Taslaci F, Reize P, Wunschel M. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: risk factors and treatment options. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2013;47(2):96. [2] Phillips CB, Barrett JA, Losina E, et al. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A(1):20. [3] Morrey BF. Instability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1992;23(2):237. [4] Malkani AL, Ong KL, Lau E, et al. Early- and late-term dislocation risk after primary hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty 2010;25(6 Suppl):21. [5] Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64(9):1295. [6] Butler RA, Hsu JR, Barrack RL. Use of an Ilizarov apparatus to perform closed reduction of chronic proximal dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88(2):411. [7] Kadar A, Gigi R, Chechik O. Protrusion of an artificial femoral head: a rare complication of chronic dislocation of the prosthetic hip. J Arthroplasty 2013;28(2):374.e17. [8] Kindsfater KA, Bureau CA, Sherman CM. Unrecognized acetabular component rotation with formation of pseudoarticulation after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25(3):498.e11. [9] Lidder S, Ranawat VS, Ranawat NS, Thomas TL. Chronic asymptomatic dislocation of a total hip replacement: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2009;3:8956. [10] Mohammed R, Cnudde P. Severe metallosis owing to intraprosthetic dislocation in a failed dual-mobility cup primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27(3):493.e1. [11] Nellensteijn JM, Nellensteijn DR, De Jong T. Case report: Painless chronic liner dissociation of a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471(6):1769.
Please cite this article in press as: C. Joyce, et al., Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation, Arthroplasty Today (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010
C. Joyce et al. / Arthroplasty Today xxx (2016) 1e5 [12] Suh KT, Moon KP, Kim IB, Lee JS. Open reduction of a chronic proximal dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008;23(5):790. [13] Binda HP, Sarkar SP. Dissociation of the S-ROM* metal-backed polyethylene acetabular linerda case report and literature review. Acta Orthop Belg 2003;69(1):86. [14] Mesko JW. Acute liner dissociation of a Pinnacle acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 2009;24(5):815. [15] Soong M, Rubash HE, Macaulay W. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004;12(5):314.
5
[16] Prokopetz JJ, Losina E, Bliss RL, et al. Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disor 2012;13:251. [17] Meftah M, Klingenstein GG, Yun RJ, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Long-term performance of ceramic and metal femoral heads on conventional polyethylene in young and active patients: a matched-pair analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95(13):1193. [18] Conroy JL, Whitehouse SL, Graves SE, et al. Risk factors for revision for early dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008;23(6):867.
Please cite this article in press as: C. Joyce, et al., Catastrophic failure of an acetabular total hip arthroplasty component mimicking a posterior dislocation, Arthroplasty Today (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2016.09.010