Vol. 40, No. 3, 1970
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
CHANGES IN THE SEDIMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS
OF DNA DUE
TO METHYLMERCURATION Dieter Department
of
W. Gruenwedel
Food Science
h Technology,
Davis,
Received
and Don S. Lu
California
University
of
California
95616
June 11, 1970 SUMMARY
The methylmercuric ion induced denaturation of DNA has been followed by determining the rate of sedimentation of native T7 DNA at neutral pH as a function of increasing CH3HgOH concentration in solvents of varying ionic strength. The denaturation and subsequent complexing reaction of DNA by CH3Hg+ appears to proceed in two steps: at first, there is a highly cooperative transition of the DNA from the native to the denatured state as indicated by an abrupt increase of ~by a factor of about 3. This is followed by a second sharp transition at higher CH3HgOH concentrations in which 2 increases additionally by a factor of 3 or more. The nature of this very rapidly sedimenting CH3HgDNA complex is unknown at present. Methylmercuric We have
studied
ions this
react
reaction
in an ultracentrifuge
measurements
are:
not
affect
the buoyant
is
reached
now binds the
beyond
buoyant
c) the
centration
denatured
DNA complex
DNA with
of sedimentation
the
more
to study
facts
very
about
density
buoyant
density
CH3HgOH does
CH 3HgOH concentration to denatured
dense
DNA which
and nonbuoyant;
amount
nonbuoyant
increase
b) in
the
of methylmercury at
the
same con-
DNA. the properties
the methylmercury-DNA
experiments.
the
a gradual
in the
becomes
native
of
transition
CH3HgOH produces increase
denaturation.
and by buoyant
a critical
becomes
CH3Hg-DNA complex
to learn
velocity
it
a gradual
of CH3HgOH as does
we decided
a cooperative
prior
DNA in Cs2S04 with
the DNA until
that
indicating
In an attempt
presented
is
(1)
The salient
of native of
there
of denatured
density,
bound;
titration
so much methylmercury
titration
DNA by causing
(2).
density
which
native
spectrophotometrically
measurements
a) the
with
Some results
below. 542
of
the
interaction of this
nonbuoyant with investigation
CH3Hgthe
help are
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Vol. 40, No. 3, 1970
MATERIALS AND METHODS T7 phage
were
centrifugation of
grown
and by banding
the phenol
extraction
The DNA was stored cacodylic 0.05
acid,
salt"
("high
Na2S04
+ 0.005
0.0025
g Na2S04 + 0.005
cacodylic g/ml
bulk
+ 0.16
24,000
determine
the
are
at
in 0.05
g Na2S04 were
+ 0.9 -M Cs2S04,
pH 6.8,
g/ml
if
acid
at
the
pH 6.8,
("low
bulk
-M
using
as a stabilizing g
was performed pH 6.8,
as in 0.0025 salt"
+ 0.005
20" C) or in 0.0025
g Cs2S04,
20" C) as well
(6).
performed
sedimentation
+ 0.45
the help
previously
experiments
experiments
of 0.5
self-generating
ug/50
in
("medium
salt'
M Na2S04 + 0.005
solution;
3
p = 1.044
uncorrected
solutions
the
The lamellar
described
of the above.
DNA concentrations. for
gradients
low concentrations
composition
routinely
was used
-s-values
to
contained
polydispersity
DNA solutions
bulk
in order
CH3HgOH) to 11 ug/50
increased
lamellar
C and
The method
solutions
of
Both
All
at 20"
E Ultracentrifuge.
of CH3HgOH) due to the
The ionic
identical
Model
(7-9).
~1 (at
performed
density
sedimentation
concentrations
DNA stock
were
rpm in a Beckman in
the DNA samples.
contained
g/ml
velocity
rate from
limiting
the
M cacodylic
rpm or 26,000
DNA ranging
of
either
pH 6.8,
g Cs2S04,
of band sedimentation
(at
as described
p = 1.250
acid,
with
20" C).
Sedimentation at
acid
by differential
T7 DNA was isolated
and purified
solution;
p = 1.127
(4).
the sedimentation
g cacodylic
acid
at
if
and purified
chloroform
JJ cacodylic
medium
solution;
(5)
at 4" C over
pH 6.8,
B (3)
in CsCl
method
-M Na2S04 + 0.005
bulk
on j$. __ coli
and lamellar , given
~1 of
was that solutions
in Svedberg
units,
solvent. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The addition T7 DNA does not critical (Fig.
of increasing alter
the rate
CH3HgOH concentration 1, curves
pertaining at pM = 3.5
amounts of
A, "high
[PM = - log
sedimentation
is reached,
A and B, and Fig.
to curve
of methylmercuric
salt"
(CH3HgOH)I.
2).
beyond
At the
bulk
of the
macromolecules s suddenly
particular
salt
the
increase
solution,
At pM = 3.3, 543
which
hydroxide
2 appears
to native until increases
concentration in s commences to reach
a plateau
a
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 40, No. 3, 1970
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
80
l
2
3
4
5
6
00
DM
s as a function Fig. 1. Plot of the rate of sedimentation pM = - log (CH3HgOH). Curve A: "high salt';- bulk solution. "medium salt" bulk solution (see MATERIALS AND METHODS).
of pM. Curve
B:
120 -
100 -
80 -4
60 -
40 -
20 -
o-
12)456\ PM
Fig. 2. Plot of the rate of pM = - log (CH3HgOH). Curve AND METHODS).
sedimentation C: "low salt"
544
5 as a function bulk solution
of pM. (see MATERIALS
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 40, No. 3, 1970
region rate
after
having
increased
of sedimentation It
a sufficiently sediments
with
pM < 3.5
yields
denatured until
strong
complexing
a rate
equal
DNA.
abruptly
are
in complete
buoyant
density
mercuric
ions
Curve
occurs
ionic
the
decrease
with
with
solution, "low
behavior
of T7 DNA exhibited
increase
in 2 of T7 DNA in the by a sudden
renewed
increase
PM-values
of
the various
It
is
-s is
in
the
that
the
of strand
flexibility separation
the
the
of 5 on pM at
solutions.
denaturation
salt"
in
solution,
as well
as "low
were in the aware
the salt" with
the
this of
reproducible
545
solution
a subsequently the g,
and thus
characteristics
we may have
increase the
radius
the macromolecules. and the
bulk
overlooked
of the
medium.
initial
lowers
at
initial
Although
sedimentation that
"medium
to increase
sedimentation
highly
the
proceeds
the sedimentation
bulk
of
Due to
reaction
5 starts to
and
DNA (1,2).
For instance,
salt"
results
of methyl-
CH3HgOH concentrations.
"high
CH3HgOH of
These
interaction
bulk
rate
differences
to associate
DNA.
sedimentation
curves
amount
to single-stranded
salt"
with
of our spectrophotometric
In contrast
"medium
CH3HgOH at
react
a large
dependence
"high
titration
since
point
2, show the
solution.
higher
in s in the
structure
enhances a result
still
DNA does not
methylmercurated
ultimately
we are nevertheless
reasonable
of the helical quently,
drop
of alkali
at which
was shown
in the
to us real
macromolecules,
corresponding
bulk
DNA that
to that
at pM = 3.8 whereas
decrease
of s at
seem to indicate the
salt"
yields
comparable
concentration,
s increases
cyanide,
by adding
of
results
C, Fig.
instance,
removal
CH HgOH concentrations. 3
in the
followed
it
ion
pM = 4.1
is
the
corresponding
counter
lower
reached,
for
the
2 = 170.
DNA whereas
native
denatured
1, and curve
in the
bulk
is
that
at pM = 3.0,
at pM = 2.6,
as sodium
at a rate
DNA leads
of the
such
this
in which
native
strength
at progressively salt"
from
yielding
studies
indeed,
of native
sediments
agreement
B, Fig.
the
agent
concentration
reaction
sharply;
of CH3HgOH at pM > 3.5,
to that
We conclude
a critical
thus
again
removal
a DNA that
However,
from 5 = 12 to 2 = 36.
increases
can be shown that
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
accompanying
in -s with of gyration
a breakdown and,
The subsequent decrease
consedrop
in molecular
in
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 40, No. 3, 1970
weight.
Indeed,
B, Fig. 36.0,
the
1) , s = 36.5, at
the
in
formaldehyde
studying (lo),
and by Zimmer helix-coil
easily
explained.
brought
about
guanosine
this
the
observed
solvent
by the sites
f are
of
and with
the
the
mo:e
However,
value
and cease
in detail:
species,
same time,
of bound
preferential
coefficient
acid
DNA (ll), induced
group.
and the bound yields set
of pM.
limit
of infinitely
ENnf
(II)] weight
the
(13-15). per
If mole
of bound where
water
M3 is
of water
Let
the
sites,
us conpolymer, of the
- V,P) [eqn. volume
mass
binding
diluted
= Ms(l
and
a high
to properties
specific
cation
less
thymidine has
to be a function
in moles
(01
and frictional
density
and relative
we define
with
rb -
of DNA nucleotide per mole unhydrous
DNA molecular
and M, the molecular
Similarly, + TM1 + rbMx) [eqn. (III)] where ii,, vl, and specific volumes of the polymer, the water
methylmercury
group.
ENnf
= M3(1
- v,p)
equal
to l/p.
If
of single-stranded
cation of all
number
solvation
is
saturation
partial
methylmercuric
+ rbMxvx)/(M3 respectively, the partial
Vl is
of
of
to the
this
and p, n and N are
and Avogadro's
vs = (M3c3 + LM1vl
(I)
the
cation
equation
weight,
the methylmercury
into
the presence
due to the mass increase
s may be related
by the
molecular
solvent
undoubtedly
after
the
coefficient species
the
at
of
(III)
DNA, s=
by Freifelder
denaturation
DNA since
(1,2).
weight
solvation
curve
denatured
obtained
alkaline
(cf.
CH3HgOH concentrations
is
of single-stranded
of
of
alkali
were
the methylmercuric
weight
are,
of
concerning
the higher
MS = M3 + TM1 + rbMx [eqn. the polymer, Ml the molecular
vX
the
increase
of
solvated
of moles r the
nucleotide,
the
sedimentation
of
at pM = 3.5
of T7 DNA in
investigations
of 5 at
volume
somewhat
coefficient
their
that
results
in studying
in
a limiting
M s' i s'
number
denaturation
addition
and sedimenting
viscosity
the heat
In part,
and a low specific
sider
with
Similar
increase
reach
measured
of DNA (12).
binding
2 should
identical
strength.
and Triebel
transition
coefficient
almost
by Studier
The renewed
the
is
same ionic
and Davison
where
sedimentation
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
DNA is
Substitution
of eqns.
(II)
and
+ rbMx(l - vxp) [eqn. (IV)] if, at the it is further assumed that the frictional
unaffected
546
by methylmercuration,
eqn.
(IV)
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 40, No. 3, 1970
permits
an estimate
to denatured of
DNA.
T7 DNA), that
binding
obtain
from
eqn.
that
2 indeed
region
We set
(IV)
?
x
this
the
We are,
however,
at a loss
of the
cesium
is
by the
from
in
the
shows
the pM value of
all
at
the plateau
likelihood
mass increase
to explain
salt
2 [P + l/vl]~
the beginning
interpretation caused
CH3Hg-group
C, Fig.
1.5 when going at
of the
and rb = 0.5 [that is, we T and G; see ref. (2)] and
Curve
pM values
in g is
weight
e.g.,
of about
above
addition
= 216,
x
= 1.45.
to the
change
M
to two bases,
by a factor
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
molecular
ml/g,
~(rb=0.5)/~(rb=O)
to us that
and that
= 0.19
only
separation
indicating
in 2 due to the
M3 = 441 (monomer
ml/g,
increases
mercuration.
increase
occurs
of strand
correct
the
v3 = 0.47
assume
the point
of
AND BIOPHYSICAL
due to methyl-
dramatic
increase
in -s
at pM < 3. Figs. salt"
bulk
rapidly the
1 and 2 show that solution
than
sedimenting
supporting
buoyant nonbuoyant
the
measurements
net
v1 = l/p experimental possible
the
the
formation
brought
mercurated
DNA.
that,
(2)
high addition
and that
results that
is
swill
presented
thus
sharp
rise
about
by the
in order
that
this
instance, medium
This
calf
"high
to produce
the
continues
thymus
containing
about high
if
in our DNA becomes 1.6 g Cs2S04( 2)
CH3HgOH concen-
or correspondingly to DNA causes
would
in the
Indeed,
at a sufficiently
CH3Hg-group
mean that
the
also
be a function
of r
far
seem to support
this
of 2 at pM < 3 reflects increase
trend
increased.
Cs2S04 concentrations, of the
is needed
solution
further for
that
of the polymer.
invalid
bulk We expect
we find
proposed
hydration is
salt"
(2 > 0) in a buoyancy
previously
activities,
in the
"low
concentration
and at sufficiently
water
CH3HgOH concentration
CH3Hg-DNA species.
at pM = 3.2
We have tration
in
electrolyte
density
a lower
the
in hydrophobic
an abrupt
decrease
approximation
[eqn.
(IV)].
notion.
onset
low
The It
is
of microgel
character
of
the methyl-
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This Public
research
Health The authors
with
has been
supported
by grant
GM 16282
from
the
United
help
in providing
States
Service. would
like
to thank
Mr.
E. Low for
T7 bacteriophage. 547
his
them
Vol. 40, No. 3, 1970
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.
D. W. Gruenwedel and N. Davidson, J. Mol. Biol., 21, 129 (1966) D. W. Gruenwedel and N. Davidson, Biopolymers, 2, 847 (1967) K. D. Lunan and R. L. Sinsheimer, Virology, 2, 455 (1956) C. A. Thomas, Jr. and J. Abelson, In "Procedures in Nucleic Acid Research", ed. by G. L. Cantoni and D. R. Davies, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York and London, 1966, pp. 553 J. D. Mandell and A. D. Hershey, Anal. Biochem., 1, 66 (1960) D. W. Gruenwedel and Chi-hsia Hsu, Biopolymers, 7, 557 (1969) J. Vinograd, R. Bruner, R. Kent, and J. Weigle, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S., 9, 902 (1963) J. Vinograd and R. Bruner, Biopolymers, A, 131 (1966) J. Vinograd and R. Bruner, Biopolymers, 5, 157 (1966) D. Freifelder and P. F. Davison, Biophys. J., 3, 49 (1963) F. W. Studier, J. Mol. Biol., 2, 373 (1965) Ch. Zimmer and H. Triebel, Biopolymers, 8, 573 (1969) R. J. Goldberg, J. Phys. Chem., 57, 194 (1953). S. Katz and H. K, Schachman, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 18, 28 (1955) R. Bruner and J. Vinograd, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 108, 18 (1965)
548