Ziad El Rassi (Editor) Carbohydrate Analysis by Modern Chromatography and Electrophoresi s Journal of Chromatography Library, Vol . 66 © 2002 Elsevier Science B .V. All rights reserved
947
CHAPTER 2 6
Electrochemical Detection of Carbohydrates a t Constant Potential after HPLC an d CE Separation s RICHARD P. BALDWI N Department of Chemistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
26 .1 . INTRODUCTION Without question, the determination of carbohydrate compounds in complex sample s represents both an extremely important and an extremely challenging task for th e modern analytical chemist . First, there is the difficulty of separating the carbohydrate s of interest from each other and from other components of the sample matri x usually carried out by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or capillar y electrophoresis (CE) . In addition, there is the difficulty of detecting a set of compound s that are poorly suited by nature to the optically based detection approaches normall y employed with these separation techniques . In this chapter, I focus on the latte r detection issue for carbohydrates and, in particular, consider the progress that ha s been made in developing alternative electrochemical (EC) detection strategies for thes e compounds . Certainly, the driving force for the interest in EC detection of carbohydrates ha s been the fact that these compounds lack a native chromophoric group that can b e accessed at convenient UV-visible wavelengths . Therefore, without prior conversio n of the carbohydrate to a suitable derivative, conventional absorbance and fluorescenc e methods provide far less than optimum sensitivity and selectivity for HPLC and C E applications . However, most carbohydrate species including not only simple sugar s but also alditols, sugar acids, aminosugars, oligo- and polysaccharides, and many suga r conjugates can undergo facile chemical oxidation and therefore make attractiv e candidates for direct EC detection with no need for derivatization . Thus, EC detection , if successful, offers the possibility of simpler, faster, and more efficient HPLC an d CE assay procedures for carbohydrate compounds . In addition, the amperometric E C systems involved are generally among the most economical and most flexible o f detection techniques available . For example, the instrumentation required to carry ou t References pp . 958—959
948
Chapter 2 6
potential control and current measurement, as required for EC detection, is relativel y unsophisticated and inexpensive . Further, the electrodes themselves can be easily varied in composition, size, and shape and, most important, can usually be miniaturized fo r applications where electrode size may be critical, e .g ., for in vivo sensing, CE detection, or incorporation onto lab-on-a-chip devices . For EC detection applications, the choice of electrode material is nearly alway s a critical one . This is certainly the case for the electro-oxidation of carbohydrat e compounds for which several common electrode materials are not well suited . Fo r example, mercury is easily oxidized itself and cannot withstand the higher oxidatio n potentials required by carbohydrates ; and carbohydrate oxidation at carbon electrodes i s kinetically unfavored and requires potentials too high for practical use . Consequently , the electrodes that have been successfully employed for such detection have consiste d of either a noble metal or a transition metal . The use of noble metal electrodes (e .g ., Pt or Au) for HPLC applications, firs t reported by Hughes and Johnson in 1981 [1], has typically been carried out with a pulsed potential format . This approach, usually termed pulsed amperometric detectio n (PAD) or, more recently, pulsed electrochemical detection (PED), is necessary becaus e adsorption of free radical intermediates produced during carbohydrate oxidation leads t o the fouling and rapid deactivation of the Pt or Au surface when the electrode is simpl y held at a constant oxidizing potential . PAD/PED addresses this problem by applicatio n of a controlled sequence of potential steps chosen to desorb the adsorbed specie s anodically and then regenerate the active state of the electrode surface cathodically. The resulting applications of PED/PAD over the past 20 years have been extensive an d leave no question concerning the broad utility of this technique ]2-5] . In fact, a separat e chapter devoted specifically to PAD/PED theory and applications has been included i n this volume (Chapter 25) . Therefore, no further discussion of noble metal electrodes an d the pulsed detection approach needs to be provided here . In addition, carbohydrate oxidation and detection has also been carried out a t electrodes made from several different transition metals (e .g ., Cu, Ni, Co, and Ru ) ]6] . Accordingly, the focus of this chapter will be the operation and performance o f such transition metal electrodes for carbohydrate analysis . In general, the applicatio n of these electrode materials has not been as extensive or as systematically developed as has that of Pt and Au . However, compared to Pt and Au, the transition metals offe r some unique detection features . Most important, electrodes from such materials al l exhibit stable activity for carbohydrate oxidation without the need for the continuou s application of surface cleaning and reactivation potentials . As a result, although thei r analytical performance is roughly comparable to that of pulsed detection at Pt and Au , the transition metals do not require specialized pulse instrumentation and thus are full y compatible with the simple potentiostatic control instrumentation commonly used for EC detection in existing HPLC and CE systems . In the discussion below, I will begi n with an overview of these electrode materials and the principles of their operation i n both HPLC and CE . Subsequently, I will review their most important applications t o date for carbohydrates, highlighting some of the most exciting new developments in th e field .
Electrochemical Detection of Carbohydrates at Constant Potential
949
26 .2. OVERVIE W 26.2.1 . Electrode materia l The transition metals that have been employed most extensively for EC detectio n of carbohydrates in HPLC and CE have been Cu [7–10], Ni [11,12], and Co [13,14] . For this reason, the discussion here will focus on these materials . In addition, severa l other metals, including Ru [15] and Ag [16,17], have been shown to be suitable fo r carbohydrate detection but have not in practice seen very much use for this purpose . Of course, as carbohydrate detection at these electrodes is nearly always performed i n strongly basic solution and at oxidizing potentials, the active electrode surfaces in al l these cases should more accurately be described as the metal oxide or hydroxide . The most usual form for the electrode to take in practice is simply a wire or dis k of the pure metal . Such electrodes can be obtained commercially in a wide range of shapes and sizes as needed, and incorporation into a cell suitable for flow analysis mus t be done in-house but is normally straightforward . Furthermore, films of these metals , especially useful for on-capillary CE detection or lab-on-a-chip applications, can b e readily generated by routine electroplating, sputtering, or vapor deposition procedures . Of course, the thickness selected for such films should keep in mind that, with use , there may be a gradual loss of metal via dissolution at the metal–metal oxide/solution interface and the presence of underlying bulk metal insures that such loss should no t adversely affect electrode functioning . In addition to the pure metal, a variety of other electrode structures, includin g alloys and composite materials, have been investigated as well . A variety of Cu and N i alloys has been investigated by Kuwana's group for the purpose of improving electrod e performance, especially with respect to long-term stability of response 118–201 . Ni–T i and Ni–Cr mixtures were reported to exhibit the best results here, and Morita et al . have recently reported the further optimization of the Ni–Ti alloy composition to permi t extremely sensitive glucose detection in microbore HPLC [21 I . Alternatively, electrode s have been prepared for several metals by incorporating particles of the insoluble meta l oxides into carbon paste or polymer films 115,22–291 . Finally, chemically modifie d electrodes containing one of the active transition metals in a specific molecular form , e .g ., Co as cobalt phthalocyanine [30,311 or Ni as nickel tetramethyl-dibenzo-tetraaz a [15] annulene 132], have also been employed as well . Apart from the applied potential required for optimum detection, the differen t electrode materials and formats tend to exhibit more similarities than differences i n overall operation and performance . One of the few systematic studies comparing th e performance of different electrode materials was that by Luo and Baldwin [331 wh o showed that the sensitivity and stability afforded by Cu and Ni for flow detection o f carbohydrates was superior to those found for most of the alternative materials . For most of the electrode systems, the carbohydrate oxidations are thought to be electrocatalyti c in nature, initiated by the electrochemical generation of a high oxidation state of th e metal substrate (such as Ni(III) or Co(III)) . Beyond this, the specific electrode reaction s involved are generally not well established ; and most of the time reaction product s have not been well characterized . Although it has often been postulated that the initia l References pp . 958—959
950
Chapter 26
oxidative event occurs at the carbonyl group of the carbohydrate, the fact that mos t of the electrode materials oxidize alditols in a similar fashion suggests that this may not be the case . Of the different metals, the one whose electrode reactions have bee n most thoroughly investigated is Cu where carbohydrate oxidations have been show n by exhaustive electrolysis to consist of many electron processes (n = 14 for glucose ) and to yield single carbon units such as formate and carbonate as final products [33] . Fortunately, lack of knowledge of electrolysis mechanisms and products does no t preclude useful analysis applications to be developed and put into practice .
26.2 .2. Separation considerations One detection requirement shared by all of the metal-based electrode system s (including Pt and Au) is that they exhibit maximum response for carbohydrate oxidatio n only under high pH conditions typically, pH 13 and seldom below pH 12 . Becaus e the pK a values of simple sugars are 12–13 [34], this means that the carbohydrate specie s will normally have some anionic character under these conditions and must be separated as such unless post-separation pH adjustment of the mobile phase or CE buffer is carrie d out . Accordingly, for HPLC applications, anion-exchange chromatography has normall y been the separation method of choice when EC detection is employed . Of course, thi s precludes the use of conventional silica-based stationary phases . Fortunately, specialized polymeric ion-exchange columns suitable for these separations are now commerciall y available . For CE applications, the high pH requirement has actually proven to be quit e convenient as the accompanying deprotonation serves to provide the carbohydrate analyte with the charge needed for effective electrophoretic migration and separation . Otherwise, an additional procedure involving formation of a charged derivative o r reliance on a more complex form of CE such as capillary electrochromatograph y would be necessary . In fact, manipulation of the pH of the CE buffer has been show n to provide an effective means for optimizing carbohydrate separation . For example , e .g ., glucose , Ye and Baldwin [35] showed that related carbohydrate compounds glucitol, and gluconic, glucaric, and glucuronic acids are ionized to different degree s in and easily separated by CE in 0 .10 M NaOH . Furthermore, many traditionall y difficult problems, such as the separation of different alditols from one another or th e resolution of complex polysaccharide mixtures, can be overcome by measures as simpl e as optimizing the pH of the CE buffer [35] or adjusting the electroosmotic flow b y surfactant addition [36] .
26 .2.3 . Instrumentatio n One issue that must be acknowledged with respect to CE/EC of carbohydrates i s that, at the time of this writing, the instrumentation required is not yet commerciall y available in a pre-packaged or `black-box' format with which the non-electrochemist
Electrochemical Detection of Carbohydrates at Constant Potential
95 1
might feel most comfortable . Rather, CE/EC devices must be assembled in-hous e from the readily available components . At the minimum, a commercial potentiosta t identical to that used for EC detection in HPLC must be acquired and then interface d to an existing CE instrument. This requires the solution of two instrumental problem s unique to EC detection in CE namely, the electrical isolation of the CE and EC electronics and the physical alignment of the EC electrode with the capillary outlet . As both of these problems, though important, are common to all CE/EC systems and no t just to those intended for carbohydrate detection, they will be described only briefl y here . The need to isolate, or `decouple', the CE and EC systems arises from the fact tha t CE separation voltages are typically 5–30 kV and generate 11A-level electrophoresi s currents as a background . This is in contrast to typical EC detection potentials of 1 V or less and currents in the nano- to pico-amp range . Thus, for practically useful CE/E C operation, it is imperative that electrical overlap of the two systems is minimized . Suc h electrical decoupling can be carried out by either of two general approaches . In th e first, decoupling is accomplished by creating a fracture in the capillary wall 1 cm o r so before the outlet end [37] . The fracture is typically covered with a porous coatin g such as Nafion in order to inhibit solution flow and stabilize the capillary and is the n immersed in an electrolyte solution that contains the high voltage CE electrode . The physical end of the capillary is immersed in a separate solution that contains the E C detection electrodes . With this arrangement (which is termed `off-column' detection) , the CE voltage and current are dropped across the capillary only up to the point of th e fracture and should have little or no interaction with the downstream EC system . In th e alternative decoupling approach (which is referred to as `end-column' detection), th e EC electrodes are simply placed at the physical end of the capillary in the same buffe r reservoir as the CE electrodes . No special isolation procedures are employed except to insure that only relatively narrow capillaries, 25 p,m or less in diameter, are used . In these cases, the ohmic resistance of the capillary is sufficiently high that the CE curren t is low in magnitude and nearly all of the CE voltage is dropped across the capillary itsel f [38,39] . Both the off-column and end-column CE/EC configurations are illustrated i n Fig . 26 .1 . The need to insure accurate capillary/electrode alignment arises from the fact tha t both the CE capillaries and the EC electrodes typically used have diameters from 5 to 100 Rm . Optimum sensitivity requires that the electrode is positioned very clos e to the capillary outlet from the outset of the analysis, and optimum reproducibilit y requires these positions are maintained throughout the entire analysis process . In th e earliest CE/EC designs, proper electrode placement was carried out by attaching th e EC microelectrode, in the form of a wire or fiber, to an x,y,z-micropositioner and the n moving it as close as possible to, and perhaps inside, the capillary tip . This is referred to as an `in-capillary' detector configuration [37,40] . Alternatively, the EC electrode can take a flat, disk-shaped form and then simply be pushed up against the capillary tip s o that exiting solution flows onto and then radially out across its surface . Because such a `wall jet' electrode is physically much larger and can be seen and worked with fairl y easily, optimum placement is far easier to establish initially and subsequently maintai n over an extended series of CE/EC experiments [41] . This advantage can be enhanced References pp. 958—959
Chapter 2 6
952
(a)
HIGH VOLTAG E POWER SUPPLY
EC DETECTION W POTENTIOSTAT
CAPILLARY DECOUPLE R
Fig . 26.1 . Off-column (a) and end-column (b) CEEC configurations . W, R, and A represent working , reference, and auxiliary electrodes, respectively.
further by fixing both the capillary and the wall-jet electrode in a mechanical support that serves to hold both in place more rigidly [42] . Finally, `on-capillary' electrode s in which the capillary and the EC electrode are incorporated into a single integrate d unit have also been described . This can be accomplished by gluing a wire electrode onto the capillary tip [43] or by sputter-coating the capillary tip with a thin layer of the desired electrode material [44] . As a result, the position of capillary and electrod e is permanently fixed ; and alignment is no longer an issue . Rather, the integrate d capillary/electrode unit is simply immersed in the terminating CE buffer reservoir at th e start of the CE/EC experiment . As a result of these instrumental developments, both the convenience and th e performance of CE/EC have been enhanced considerably . For example, both the wall jet and the on-capillary configurations have shown peak height variations of less tha n 2% for repeated injections with the same capillary—electrode arrangement and of les s than 5% for different electrodes or capillary—electrode alignments . Typically, the same electrodes can be used for continuous day-long experiments and for discontinuou s experiments spanning several weeks . Although this may not always be the case, on capillary electrodes have sometimes proven to be more durable than the capillar y itself.
Electrochemical Detection of Carbohydrates at Constant Potential
95 3
26 .3. APPLICATION S To date, nearly every variety of carbohydrate compound has been detected unde r constant potential conditions at one or more of the transition metal electrodes describe d above . A representative listing of these applications is given in Table 26 .1 . No attempt was made here to provide a comprehensive compilation, but rather the listing highlights those reports that seem either to possess a historical significance to the field or t o address particularly unusual or important carbohydrate analytes . Because the focu s here is especially on the EC detection step rather than the separation process, example s involving flow-injection analysis (i .e ., with no formal separation process) are included i n addition to those where the EC detection is coupled to HPLC or CE . In the former cases , the detection could clearly be coupled to either or both of these separation systems, i f desired . Among the carbohydrate compounds successfully detected and quantitated at constant potential electrodes have been not only simple mono- and oligosaccharides but als o the following related species : alditols, aldonic, aldaric, and uronic acids, aminosugars , nucleosides, aminoglycosides, and cyclodextrins . Fig . 26 .2 illustrates a typical separation of several such compounds from the glucose and galactose families via HPL C on a commercially available high pH anion-exchange column and with detection at a Cu-based electrode [511 . The samples included all the alditol and acidic sugar derivatives for each family, and the elution order observed was exactly that expected on th e basis of the compounds' pK a values and their resulting ionic character in the 0 .13 M NaOH/0.02 M Na 2 SO 4 mobile phase employed . This particular system was intended t o showcase the separation of analytes with very different charges, ranging here from th e nearly uncharged glucitol and galactitol to the di-anionic glucaric and galactaric acids . In fact, a more challenging problem is presented by the separation of a group of mor e closely related carbohydrate compounds e .g ., a series of alditols . Such a separation , achieved here by CE with EC detection again at a Cu electrode, is illustrated in Fig . 26 . 3 [35] . The electropherograms shown here were obtained for a series of eight differen t alditols at four different NaOH concentrations . In all cases, the pH was sufficiently hig h for the operation of the Cu electrode ; but only under the most alkaline conditions were the alditols (pKa = 13—44) sufficiently deprotonated to permit their separation by CE . An obvious point of interest is the question of whether detectability is limited t o relatively low molecular weight species, which certainly represent the compounds tha t have been the most frequently studied, or can be extended to larger polysaccharides a s well . On this issue, there have been two specific studies reported to date . Zhou an d Baldwin used CE with EC detection at Cu electrodes to investigate some commerciall y available polysaccharide samples [36] . These included enzymatically hydrolyzed starc h with polysaccharide fragments containing 10—15 glucose units and dextran sample s with nominal molecular mass as high as 18,300 Da (or containing approximately 10 0 monosaccharide units) . Also, Lewinski et al . reported the detection of heparin, a highl y sulfated glucosamine/glucuronic acid polysaccharide with a molecular mass in th e 15,000-Da range, via flow-injection analysis at both Ru oxide and Cu oxide electrode s [29] . Because the separation difficulties encountered with samples as complex as thes e and the lack of available standards, it was not possible in either of these studies t o References pp. 958—959
o
,..)
P.
954
.1
,=
Y
=
,E
7.. L~
'~
~
7. ~J
I.-
9lJ
=
~
".~
.~= ~
•-
,~ ~
,
=~
=
.~'~
~
~ ,
~
~ . ~
~-~
~
,~
.
,
.~,~ ~ '~
-~
0
¢
~;
,~
~_~
d_
•
r~.- d
•-
~
----
.~
¢.. L~
.=_
o
.~,~
--
>.,
E
< --~
o
-=
,
Chapter 26
o
~
g
~J
o
.=_
.
"N
.
.
,
.-
.
.,.=
q =
~
~
..=
~
=
~
~A
J
Electrochemical Detection of Carbohydrates at Constant Potential
955
H
T
2 pA i
0
8
16 32 24 Retention Time, mi n
40
48
Fig . 26 .2 . Chromatograms of glucose and galactose families . Stationary phase, Dionex Carbopac PA 1 column ; mobile phase, 0 .020 M Na2 SO4 /0 .134 M NaOH ; working electrode, Cu CME at +0 .50 V vs . Ag/AgCI . Labeled peaks correspond to glucitol (A), glucose (B), gluconic acid (C, 8 x 10 -6 M), glucuroni c acid (D), glucaric acid (E), galactitol (F), galactose (G), galactonic acid (H, 2 .5 x 10 -5 M), galacturonic aci d (I), and galactaric acid (J) ; all concentrations were 4 x 10 M unless indicated otherwise .
evaluate the electrodes' response for specific polysaccharides . However, it is clear that EC at transition metal electrodes offers a viable detection approach for carbohydrate s well above the oligosaccharide level .
26 .4. CONCLUSIONS In assessing the present state and future possibilities of constant potential E C detection of carbohydrates, it seems beneficial to take two different points of reference . First, one can try to compare the strengths and weaknesses of the approach vs . its mos t References pp. 958—959
956
Chapter 2 6 1-8 6. 7
T 1
T
10 n A
(a)
0
i 6 12 18
0
Time/min
6
. t . 12 18 24
Time/min
6.7
4 5 3 6
5 4
2
8 1
(d )
Fig . 26 .3 . Electropherograms of alditol mixture in 25 mM NaOH (a), 0.10 M NaOH (b), 0 .20 M NaOH (c) , and 0 .25 M NaOH (d) . Capillary, 80 cm long ; separation voltage, 15 kV; working electrode, 100-µm C u disk at +0.60 V vs . Ag/AgCl . Labeled peaks correspond to ethylene glycol (1, 1 mM), glycerol (2, 50 0 11M), inositol (3, 160 µM), erythritol (4, 250 1 .iM), galactitol (5, 250 1iM), adonitol (6, 250 µM), glucito l (7, 250 µM), and mannitol (8, 250 µM) .
Electrochemical Detection of Carbohydrates at Constant Potential
957
immediate alternative, pulsed EC detection at Au or Pt . Alternatively, one might try to evaluate EC detection in general vs . other usually spectroscopy-based carbohydrate detection strategies . In what follows below, I will try to address both of these questions directly.
26 .4 .1 . Constant potential vs . pulsed detection EC detection of carbohydrates using a pulsed potential format at Au and Pt electrodes represents a firmly established analysis approach . Thanks largely to the persistent effort s of Dennis Johnson's group at Iowa State University, the electrode processes involve d in PED are well characterized ; the instrumentation needed for PED, at least for HPL C applications, can be purchased commercially ; and PED's ability to provide sensitive an d relatively stable analytical performance has been amply demonstrated . By comparison , constant potential detection at transition metal electrodes offers possible advantages i n two respects . First, the instrumentation required for constant potential detection is b y nature simpler than that required for PED . Second, the constant potential detection mod e should, in principle, provide better detectability and lower detection limits because, al l other things being equal, noise (especially in the form of charging current) should b e minimized when the applied potential is invariant . In practice, however, these advantages have not proven to be decisive factors to users of the EC technique . Even a cursory scan of the relevant literature shows that there have been over the years, and continue to be today, many more reported applications of PE D for carbohydrate detection than of the constant potential approach . This preference fo r PED is especially apparent for HPLC applications where pre-packaged PED instrumentation is already available and many separation and detection protocols have alread y been documented . This preference, based largely on convenience, holds much les s for CE-based applications where EC instrumentation of both types must normally b e assembled in-house and there are very few longstanding and well-established analytica l procedures . Interestingly, Casella et al . have recently compared the quantitative detectio n capabilities of PED and constant potential detection at Au/Cu [49] and Au/Ni [501 composite electrodes that are capable of supporting both detection modes and have foun d that the latter gives consistently lower detection limits and wider linear ranges in HPLC , usually by a factor of 5-10 . Nevertheless, this modest gain in detectability with constan t potential detection has not been sufficiently important to remove PED from its dominan t position in HPLC studies . It may be expected, however, that the constant potential ap proach may find itself better able to compete with PED in CE applications and espe cially those involving new lab-on-a-chip instrumentation where issues of instrumen t simplicity and ruggedness may turn out to be more important than they are in HPLC .
26 .4 .2. EC detection in general It must be generally admitted that EC-based detection methods have usually bee n slow to be adopted fully by the non-electrochemical community when more familia r References pp . 958—959
958
Chapter 2 6
optical detection methods are available as an alternative . To a large extent, this has been true for carbohydrates for which analyses involving complicated and time-consumin g derivatization with strongly absorbing or fluorescing functional groups continue to b e widely used despite the fact that EC techniques normally allow direct detection withou t the need to carry out such operations . In the future, two factors may act in the favo r of the EC approach . Certainly, the accessibility of EC methods has increased to th e extent that a highly specialized background in electrochemistry is no longer required fo r their implementation . Furthermore, the ease of miniaturization of EC electrodes and th e simplicity and affordability of the associated EC instrumentation make this approac h ever more attractive for CE applications than for HPLC . For the development of full y microfabricated instrumentation, these aspects of EC detection should be even mor e appealing . Thus, for these newer and still emerging separation methodologies, it shoul d be expected that interest in EC detection in both the pulsed and the constant potentia l formats will increase and intensify in the years to come .
26.5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by a grant from the U .S . National Science Foundatio n XYZ-on-a-Chip Program .
26.6 . REFERENCE S 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24.
S . Hughes and D .C . Johnson, Anal . Chim . Acta, 132 (1981) 1 1 D .C . Johnson and W.R . LaCourse, Anal . Chem ., 62 (1990) 589A . W.R . LaCourse and D .C . Johnson, Carbohydr . Res ., 215 (1991) 15 9 D .C . Johnson and W .R . LaCourse, Electroanalysis, 4 (1992) 36 7 D .C . Johnson and W.R . LaCourse, in Z . El Rassi (Ed .), Carbohydrate Analysis, Elsevier, Amsterdam , 1995, p . 39 1 R .P. Baldwin, J . Pharm . Biomed . Anal ., 19 (1999) 69 S .V. Prabhu and R .P. Baldwin, Anal . Chem ., 61 (1989) 85 2 P. Luo, S .V. Prabhu and R .P. Baldwin, Anal . Chem ., 62 (1990) 75 2 L .A . Colon, R . Dadoo and R .N . Zare, Anal . Chem ., 65 (1993) 476 P.D . Voegel and R .P. Baldwin, Am . Lab ., 28 (1996) 3 9 K .G . Schick, V.G . Magearu and C .O . Huber, Clin . Chem . (Winston-Salem, NC), 24 (1978) 44 8 R .E . Reim and R .M . Van Effen, Anal . Chem ., 58 (1986) 3203 T.R .I . Cataldi, I .G . Casella, E . Desimoni and T. Rotunno, Anal . Chim . Acta, 270 (1992) 16 1 T.R .I . Cataldi, A . Guerrieri, I .G. Casella and E . Desimoni, Electroanalysis, 7 (1995) 305 J . Wang and Z. Taha, Anal . Chem ., 62 (1990) 141 3 T.P. Tougas, M .J . DeBenedetto and J .M . DeMott Jr., Electroanalysis, 5 (1993) 66 9 J .M . DeMott Jr., T.P. Tougas and E .G .E . Jahnzen, Electroanalysis, 10 (1998) 83 6 J .M . Marioli and T. Kuwana, Electroanalysis, 5 (1993) 1 1 P.F. Luo and T. Kuwana, Anal . Chem ., 66 (1994) 277 5 P.F. Luo, T. Kuwana, D .K . Paul and P.M .A . Sherwood, Anal . Chem ., 68 (1996) 333 0 M . Morita, O . Niwa, S . Tou and N . Watanabe, J . Chromatogr. A, 837 (1999) 1 7 J .M . Zadeii, J. Marioli and T. Kuwana, Anal . Chem ., 63 (1991) 649 Y. Xie and C .O . Huber, Anal . Chem ., 63 (1991) 171 4 S . Mannino, M . Rossi and S . Ratti, Electroanalysis, 3 (1991) 711
Electrochemical Detection of Carbohydrates at Constant Potential 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51.
95 9
Q . Chen, J . Wang, G . Rayson, B . Tian and Y. Lin, Anal . Chem., 65 (1993) 25 1 M .E .G . Lyons, C .A. Fitzgerald and M .R. Smyth, Analyst, 119 (1994) 85 5 K . Kano, M . Torimura, Y . Esaka and M . Goto, J . Electroanal . Chem ., 372 (1994) 13 7 S . Mannino, M .S . Cosio and P. Zimei, Electroanalysis, 8 (1996) 35 3 K. Lewinski, Y. Hu, C .C . Griffin and J .A . Cox, Electroanalysis, 9 (1997) 67 5 L.M . Santos and R.P. Baldwin, Anal. Chim . Acta, 206 (1988) 8 5 J. Zhou and S .M . Lunte, Anal . Chem ., 67 (1995) 1 3 T.R .I . Cataldi, E . Desimoni, G . Ricciardi and F. Lelj, Electroanalysis, 7 (1995) 435 M .Z . Luo and R .P. Baldwin, J . Electroanal . Chem ., 387 (1995) 8 7 A .T. Andrews, Electrophoresis : Theory, Techniques and Biomedical and Clinical Applications, Oxfor d University Press, New York, 1981, p . 7 J . Ye and R .P. Baldwin, J . Chromatogr. A, 687 (1994) 14 1 W. Zhou and R .P. Baldwin, Electrophoresis, 17 (1996) 31 9 R.A . Wallingford and A .G . Ewing, Anal . Chem ., 59 (1987) 176 2 X . Huang, R.N. Zare, S . Sloss and A .G . Ewing, Anal . Chem ., 63 (1991) 18 9 W. Lu and R .M . Cassidy, Anal . Chem ., 66 (1994) 200 S . Sloss and A .G . Ewing, Anal . Chem ., 65 (1993) 57 7 J . Ye and R .P. Baldwin, Anal . Chem ., 65 (1993) 352 5 A .M . Fermier, M .L . Gostkowski and L .A. Colon, Anal . Chem ., 68 (1996) 166 1 M . Zhong and S .M . Lunte, Anal . Chem., 68 (1996) 248 8 RD. Voegel, W. Zhou and R .P. Baldwin, Anal . Chem ., 69 (1997) 95 1 S .V. Prabhu and R .P. Baldwin, Anal . Chem ., 61 (1989) 225 8 PD. Voegel and R .P. Baldwin, Electroanalysis, 9 (1997) 114 5 J . Hong and R .P. Baldwin, J . Cap . Elec ., 4 (1997) 6 5 Y. Fang, F. Gong, X . Fang and C . Fu, Anal . Chim . Acta, 369 (1998) 3 9 I .G. Casella, M . Gatta and E. Desimoni, J. Chromatogr. A, 814 (1998) 6 3 I .G . Casella, M .R . Guascito and T.R .I . Cataldi, Anal . Chim . Acta, 398 (1999) 15 3 S .V. Prabhu and R .P. Baldwin, J . Chromatogr., 503 (1990) 227