Journal of Fluorine Chemistry,
13(1979)
7 - 18
7
0 Elsevier Sequoia S.A., Lausanne - Printed in the Netherlands Received: October 19.1978
CHEMISTRY HF
WITH
A. E.
IN
HYDROGEN
HALOGENATED
FLUORIDE
V.
CATALYSTS
FOR
REACTION
OF
OLEFINS*
FEIRING
Central
Research
Experimental
& Development
Station,
Wilmington,
Delaware
Department,
E. I. du Pont de Nemours
& Company
19898
SUMMARY
Tantalum
pentafluoride,
tetrachloride,
and molybdenum
of hydrogen
fluoride
compounds.
Hydrogenation
chloroethane TaF5
was
niobium
pentafluoride,
pentachloride
to tetra-
and
catalyze
trichloroethene
of tetrachloroethene
observed
using
hydrogen,
titanium the addition and related
to 1,1,2,2-tetra-
methylcyclopentane,
and
in HF.
INTRODUCTION The
liquid
is an important compounds. alkenes
1
method
by halogen,
this report,
several
in particular, over
Contribution
proceeds
as tetra-
antimony
2615
Alkenes
employed
or boron
hydrocarbon heavily
substituted
require
a
which catalysts.
Catalyst,
trifluoride.
for this addition
pentafluoride
previously
with
or trichloroethene, -
pentachloride2
to alkenes
of organofluorine
readily
or below.
new catalysts
tantalum
No.
of hydrogen.fluoride
for the synthesis
temperature
such
traditionally
f
addition
The addition
at room
advantages
phase
appears
3
In
are described, to have major
8 RESULTS The
fluorination
two processes:
addition
monofluorinated for chlorine derivatives
heated time
2 and 2.
Catalysts
for this process
of batch
HF catalyst
2
at 75-150"
the mixture
The results
are
of the crude
was
shown
reaction
absorptions
vessel.
in Table mixture
assignable
demonstrated
were
fluorinated screened
>
of the catalyst
After
dried, 1.
highly
of 0.2 mole
appropriate
to 0" and quenched
separated,
the
of fluorine
HF catalyst
A mixture
to 0.018 mole
in a closed
involves
HCC12-CF3
'
experiments.
was cooled
phase
the more
HCC12-CC12F
~--> catalyst
to give
by a series
giving
of HF, and 0.006
experiments
followed
reactions
The organic
only
2
bond
exchange
HCC12-CClF
0.5 mole
(,&I formally
of HF to the double
derivative
CC12=CCl*
in a series
of tetrachloroethene
and
with
by proton
that no reaction
reaction
by glpc.
examination
and fluorine
to the products
was
ice water.
analyzed
In all cases,
of ,$,
nmr showed
in Table occurred
1.
Control
in the absence
of a catalyst. The results in addition
to the previously
for the reaction. active
indicate
Tantalum
of the materials
temperatures inactive.
that TaF5, known
TiC14,
SbC15,
pentafluoride
tested,
as low as 75O where
maintaining antimony
MoF5,
and NbF5,
are active appears
catalysts
to be the most
its activity pentachloride
to was
9 Table
1
Addition
of HF to Tetrachloroethylenea
Catalystb (mole %)
c
Product Analysisd J. 2, 2
6.
TaF5
(9)
1500
24.9 g
3
4
93
-
TaF5
(2.5)
150"
27.3 g
1
3
94
2
TaF5
(9)
7s"
30.3 g
30
40
30
-
SbC15
(3)
150"
24.6 g
48
21
30
-
SbC15
(9)
750
28.7 g
100
-
-
-
TiC14
(9)
1500
25.9 g
47
42
11
-
MoC15
(9)
150°
22.8
32
53
16
-
1500
29 4
61
34
4
-
NbF5 a.
Product Weight
Temperature
(51
0.2 mole
CC12=CC12;
percent
0.5 mole
HF; 6 hr.
b.
mole
C.
crude
d.
by glpc using a 10 ft x 0.25 in.lO% operated at 60°.
product
Under TaC15,
no catalytic
scale
an 86% yield
150".
at 150'
experiment
was
TaF5
Trichloroethene
tetrachloroethene, successful
fluorination.
the olefin
to a stirred
column
HgO,
BF3,
and WC1 6 showed reaction. 6) using
A
TaF5
gave
,J. of additional
are
(,5), a more
shown
in Table
sensitive
somewhat
solution
halogenated
to a mixture
were
of TaF5
HCl generated
2.
Fluorotri-
of ,$ and $ at
molecule
different
Best results
(5-25O).
and filtering.
experiments,
for the addition
converted
required
batch
(Table 2, entry
catalysis
smoothly
drying,
carbowax
NbC15,
on the fluorination
using
low temperatures
with water,
of these
of pure distilled
Results
chloroethene
washing
V 0 ZrC14, 2 5'
CoF3,
activity
preparative
on CC12=CC12.
after
the conditions
Ta205,
compounds
based
g
than
conditions
achieved
for
by adding
in HF at relatively in the reaction
must
be
2
(0.08)
(0.8)
(0.3)
CC12=CHC1
CC12=CHC1
CC12=CHCl
Isolated
yield
(0.2)
HCC12CC12H
a.
(0.2)
CH2C1CC1F2
(0.25)
(0.2)
CH3CC13
(0.8)
CC12=CC12
HCC12CC12F
(0.4)
(0.2)
CC1F=CC12
CH2=CC12
(moles)
TaF5
0.5
product,
TaF 5 (0.01)
1.0
based
hr
hr
hr
hr
hr
hr
1500/6
(33)
(trace) HCCl,-CCl,H
H2CCl-CF3
(70)
tar recovered
H2CC1-CF3
(31) (5)
H3C-CC1F2
(80) (10)
(86)
(40)
HCC1=CC12
H3C-CC12F
HCC12-CF3
HCC12-CC1F2
HCC12-CC1F2
tar
H3C-CC12F
recovered
H2CC1-CC12F
charged.
hr
1000/6
7S"/6 hr
1500/6
1500/6
25"/3
25'/17
(89)
(1)
(40)
H2CC1-CC12F H2CC1-Ccl3
(32)
hr H2CC1-CClF2
HCC12-CF3
(75) (15)
(%)a
HCC12-CC1F2
Product
5O/2.5 hr H2CCl-CC12F
25'/0.5
150"/6
on substrate
(0.018)
(0.0075)
TaF5
0.25
(0.018)
(0.02)
(0.01)
TaF5
TaF5
TaF5
(0.015)
(0.008)
(0.002)
(0.018)
(moles) Conditions
0.25
2.0
0.5
BF3
TaF5
1.0
0.5
TaF5
TaF5
Catalyst
0.25
0.5
HF, moles
of distilled
Reactions
Substrate
Fluorination
Table
(50)
(60)
11 vented
to prevent
HCl addition conditions were
product,
quite
obtained.
the catalyst
of substantial
good
boron
yields
products
under
more
Ts>
unreacted
somewhat
gave
only
of the
Under
of fluorinated
trifluoride3
being
quantities
1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane.
In contrast,
the remainder
HCC1=CC12
formation
,$ and 2
severe
a 33% yield
conditions,
oE ,Q with
5. %
H2CC1-CC12F
&>
H2CCl-CClF2
5 25O
$+
5
2
these
5
$
5
H2CCl-CF3 R
Vinylidene
chloride
yield
treated
when The
TaF5/HF
gave with
converted
TaF5
fluorination
was briefly cleanly
chloroethane
were
l,l-dichloro-l-fluoroethane and 1.25
of several
explored
saturated
under
substrate
when
In view
treated
medium
pressures TaF5/HF Reaction potential
a brief
relatively
was conducted.
in acid
the conditions
in the presence
The presence
hydride
donor,
resulted
conditions.
catalyzed
unreacted
hydrogena-
of & in the
of hydrogen
on the reaction
of the first
of 0.2 mole
2 was
tars plus
on the reduction
up to 5000 psi had no effect under
usi.ng
at 150'.
interest
study
mild
gave mainly
TaF5/HF
of the recent
4-7 tion reactions, TaF5/HF
with
halocarbons
Both 1 and l,l,l-tri-
to ,$ and $ at 150". fluorinated
of HF at 25'.
As expected,
(Table 2).
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
However,
equivalents
in 40%
entry
at of & with
in Table
1.
of methylcyclopentane,
only
in,conversion
of the
a
12 hydrocarbon heating
to cyclohexane;
a mixture
(5000 psi) products
IIF (0.5 mole),
methylcyclopentane
(0.1 mole),
and hydrogen
traces
2, or 4. ?,
isolated
ethane,
was recovered
However,
(0.2 mole),
gave only
$
unchanged.
of tetrachloroethene
(0.018 mole),
TaF5
~ 1 was recovered
of unreacted
The major
in 30% yield
essentially
product
based
$ andthe
fluorination
was 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroThe methylcyclopentane
on $.
unchanged.
DISCUSSION The addition to involve
protonation
resulting
cation
probably
stems
capable The
of hydrogen
acceptors is well
of
'super-acid'
sequence
basic
systems
pentahalides
highly
from HF and
of the
species
olefins. fluoride
and tantalum
exchange
(Scheme
e.g.,
L$ and 2, is more
process
1) could
formation
ion
pentafluoride
account
difficult
for the observed
exchange 2l e
of more
highly
to define.
and an elimination-addition
HCC12-CC12F
HCC12-CC1F2 exchange
2 i CC12=CF2
acidic
halogenated
1
CC12=CClF
by capture
of this process
of more
of the subsequent
products,
Both a direct
followed
is likely
8
The mechanism fluorinated
to olefins
Catalysis
the weakly
such as antimony known.
1
the formation
of protonating
formation
Scheme
of the olefin
by fluoride.
from
fluoride
HCC12CF3 4.
results.
13 The conversion of ,$ to 2 is a catalyzed process as no reaction occurs when $ is treated with HF alone at 150'. several mechanisms for this catalysis can be proposed
A priori_,
(Scheme 2).
Pathway a is a ligand exchange process which has previously been proposed' for antimony halide catalyzed fluorination reactions. Scheme 2 HCC12-CC12F
HCC12CF2Cl
Pathway b involves an acid catalyzed loss of chloride generating a carbocation which can form product through the olefin (pathway c) or directly by fluoride ion capture
(pathway d).
The requirements
for any active catalyst for these processes should differ.
The
effectiveness of a catalyst for the direct exchange process (pathway a) should depend in part on the lability of its ligands and the concentration of coordinately unsaturated species in solution.
Pathway b requires the catalyst to generate a Species
sufficiently acidic to protonate 2.
In principle, a comparison
14 of the efficiency study
for the & ->
process
could
plicated
largely
by the question
from
10
decrease
its activity
in superacid produced
of the now well
Interestingly,
by protonation
of donating
reduced
hydride
compared
to Sb(II1)
with
is known5
to
catalyst.
4-6
reduction
is
of carbocations
the cation
of ,& is not directly in the presence
from a tertiary
to that of delocalized of aromatic
known
In
here may derive
to reduction6
of Sb(V)
is com-
lifetimes.
observed
2
possibilities
of 1; to 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
media.
is efficiently
to the 2 ->
mechanistic
catalyst
as a fluorination
The reduction example
resistance
in this
from this study
of TaF5
Reduction
halides.
on these
of relative
its greater
identified
compared
of data
performance
antimony
another
information
interpretations
the superior
catalysts
2 transformation
provide
Unfortunately,
fact,
of the various
reduced
of a hydrocarbon
position,
carbocations
by H2, but
formed
behavior
capable similar
by the protonation
4
hydrocarbons.
EXPERIMENTAL Hydrogen
fluoride
(Alfa), niobium (Fisher),and received. inert
samples
pentafluoride
molybdenum
Antimony
atmosphere used
(Air Products),
pentachloride
pentachloride
before
use.
as received.
A-60
instrument
Fluorine
NMR spectra
operated
at 94.1 MHz using obtained
reagents
NMR spectra with
obtained CFC13
tetrachloride
(Alfa) were
All other
in CDC19
were
titanium
pentafluoride
used
as
(B & A) was distilled
Proton
a Varian
data were
(Alfa),
tantalum
were
as internal 5700A
commercial
obtained
TMS as internal
on a Varian
on a Hewlett-Packard
were
in an
XL-100
on
standard. instrument
standard. instrument.
Glpc
15 Caution! human
tissue,
Laboratory
Hydrogen
contact
work
hood with
resulting
with
operator
fluoride
IIF should
wearing
full
is extremely
in painful,
corrosive
slow-healing
be conducted
only
face shield
to burns.
in an efficient
and protective
clothinq.
Catalyst
Screen
An 80-ml (0.2 mole)
Hastelloy
of tetrachloroethene
The bomb was cooled charged
with
10 g
to atmospheric for six hours was cooled
in dry
pressure with
over
organic
parison with
layer
anhydrous
analyzed
flow of 60 ml/min.
Preparation
(0.8 mole)
Hastelloy
bomb
of tetrachloroethene
pentafluoride. evacuated,and
15ooc.
with
The
against
was agitated
with
40 g
for 6 hr with
The bomb was cooled
and
com-
gas
in Table
1.
(2)
with
132.8
g
of tantalum
ice and acetone,
of hydrogen
an inside
in ice water.and
dried
column
carrier
and 5.6 g (0.02 mole)
(2 mole)
The
authentic
tube was charged
in dry
onto
was weighed
in 10% Carbowax
are contained
bomb was cooled
charged
The bomb
water,and
of 1,2,2-Trichloro-l,l-Difluoroethane
A 360-ml
was agitated
the bomb.
of 60°C and a helium results
and brought
discharged
The material
a 10 ft x 0.25
The
evacuated,and
were
washed
33.2 g
of the catalyst.
of 150°C.
to rinse
chromatography
temperature
mole
The bomb
and the contents
chloride.
with
fluoride,
temperature
was collected,
using
0.018
nitrogen.
40 ml of water
by gas liquid
an oven
and
of hydrogen
an inside
calcium
samples
The bomb
with
in ice water
tube was charged
ice and acetone,
(0.5 mole)
30 g of ice, using lower
bomb
fluoride.
temperature the contents
of were
16 discharged onto 50 g of ice using 15 ml of water to rinse the bomb.
The lower organic layer was separated, washed with water,
and dried over calcium chloride.
It weighed 126.5 g.
A
115.6-g portion of the product was distilled at atmospheric pressure to give 104.6 g (0.675 mole, 84%) of 1,2,2-trichloro1,1-difluoroethane as a colorless liquid, bp 70-72'C; proton NMR (6, CDC13) 5.85 (t, J = 5.3 Hz): fluorine NMR (6, CDC13) -63.31 (d, J = 5.3 Hz).
Preparation of 1,1,2-Trichloro-1-Fluoroethane A 250-ml polychlorotrifluoroethylene
C,$,)
vessel was charged
with 2.2 g (0.008 mole) of tantalum pentafluoride.
The vessel
was evacuated, cooled in liquid N2 and ch,arged by distillation with 20 g (1.0 mole) of hydrogen fluoride.
The vessel was filled
with nitrogen and immersed in a bath of water and ethylene glycol at 5OC.
Trichloroethene
added in one portion. 2.5 hr.
(108 g, 0.8 mole), cooled to OOC, was
The resulting mixture was stirred for
The mixture was poured over 40 g of cracked ice.
The
organic layer was separated, washed with water, and dried over anhydrous calcium chloride. chloro-l-fluoroethane
It weighed 116.7 g.
1,1,2-Tri-
(108.1 g, R9%), bp 87-89OC,was obtained
by distillation: proton NMR (6, CDC13) 4.13 (d, J = 13 Hz)
Hydrogenation of Tetrachloroethene An 80-ml Hastelloy bomb tube was charged with 33.2 g (0.2 mole) of tetrachloroethene, 8.4 g (0.1 mole) of methylcyclopentane,and 2.8 g (0.01 mole) of tantalum pentafluoride. The bomb was cooled in dry ice and acetone, evacuated and charged with 10 g (0.5 mole) of hydrogen fluoride.
The bomb was warmed
to 25' and pressured to 5000 psi with hydrogen.
The bomb was
agitated for 6 hr with an inside temperature of 150°C.
The
bomb was cooled to O0 and vented slowly to atmospheric pressure. The contents were discharged onto 40 q of ice.
The lower organic
layer was collected, washed with water,and dried over anhydrous calcium chloride.
Evaporative distillation of the material at
2 mm to a vessel cooled in dry ice gave 19 q of colorless liquid, separating it from a quantity of tar.
Proton NMR of the liquid
showed upfield absorption for methylcyclopentane and a singlet at 6 5.95 for 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane.
Glpc analysis of
the material against authentic samples using a 10 ft x 0.25 in 10% carbowax column with an oven temperature of 50' confirmed the above products.
The chromatoqraph also showed traces of
&I 51 and 2.
REFERENCES
W. A. Sheppard and C. M. Sharts,
'Organic Fluorine
Chemistry,' W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York (19691, pages 59-65. M. R. Frederick, U.S. Patent 2,724,004 (Nov. 15, 1955); E. T. McBee, U.S. Patent 2,637,747 (Jan. 23, 1948). R. C. Arnold, U.S. Patent 2,560,838 (July 17, 1951); A. L. Henne and R. C. Arnold, J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 70, 758 (1948). J. Wristers, J. Chem. Sot. Chem. Commun., 575 (1977). H. Hoqeveen, C. J. Gaasbeek, and A. F. Bickel, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 88, 703 (1969); H. Hoqeveen and A. F. Bickel, ibid, 88, 719 (1969).
18 6
M. Siskin
and J. Porcelli,
(1974); M. Siskin, 98,
5413
A. E. Feirinq,
8
M. Kilpatrick
Press,
ibid.=,
3641
Chem.
Sot. 96,
(1974); M. Siskin,
3640 ibid
(1976).
7
Aqueous
J. Amer.
J. Org. Chem. and J. G. Jones
Solvents,' New York,
9
Reference
10
M. Herlem,
42,
J. J. Laqowski 1967,
1, pages Pure
in
Chapter
3255
(1977).
'The Chemistry ed.,
Vol.
2.
76-81.
Appl.
Chem.
49, 107
(1977).
of Non-
II, Academic