Chiral capillary electrophoresis

Chiral capillary electrophoresis

Journal Pre-proof Chiral Capillary Electrophoresis Samuel Bernardo-Bermejo, Elena Sánchez-López, María Castro-Puyana, María Luisa Marina PII: S0165-9...

1MB Sizes 2 Downloads 139 Views

Journal Pre-proof Chiral Capillary Electrophoresis Samuel Bernardo-Bermejo, Elena Sánchez-López, María Castro-Puyana, María Luisa Marina PII:

S0165-9936(19)30518-7

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.115807

Reference:

TRAC 115807

To appear in:

Trends in Analytical Chemistry

Received Date: 8 September 2019 Revised Date:

20 December 2019

Accepted Date: 5 January 2020

Please cite this article as: S. Bernardo-Bermejo, E. Sánchez-López, M. Castro-Puyana, M.L. Marina, Chiral Capillary Electrophoresis, Trends in Analytical Chemistry, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.trac.2020.115807. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

1

CHIRAL CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS

2

Samuel Bernardo-Bermejo1, Elena Sánchez-López1,2, María Castro-Puyana1,2, María

3

Luisa Marina1,2*

4

1

5

Ciencias, Universidad de Alcalá, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona Km. 33.600, 28871 Alcalá de

6

Henares (Madrid), Spain.

Departamento de Química Analítica, Química Física e Ingeniería Química, Facultad de

2

7

Instituto de Investigación Química Andrés M. del Río (IQAR), Universidad de Alcalá, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona Km. 33.600, 28871 Alcalá de Henares (Madrid), Spain.

8 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

*

17

Email: [email protected]

18

Tel: (+34)-918854935

Corresponding author: Maria Luisa Marina

19

20

21

1

22

ABSTRACT

23

The implications of chirality in different environments are already well known and reported

24

extensively in the literature. Capillary Electrophoresis, a separation technique that only

25

requires few nanoliters of sample, has demonstrated its potential for chiral analysis in the

26

past years. The aim of this article is to provide an overview on the fundamentals and

27

characteristics of Chiral Capillary Electrophoresis as well as the main advances and trends

28

in this topic. Special attention is paid to the most recent technological and methodological

29

developments achieved mainly in the most employed separation mode (Electrokinetic

30

Cromatography). The most noteworthy and recent applications reported on the

31

enantiomeric separation and determination of compounds in pharmaceutical, food,

32

biomedical, environmental or forensic samples will also be critically overviewed. The

33

characteristics of the developed methodologies will be detailed in Tables and future trends

34

will also be discussed.

35

36

Keywords:

Chiral

Capillary

Electrophoresis;

Enantiomers;

37

Chromatography; pharmaceutical formulations; food; biological samples.

Electrokinetic

38

39

Abbreviations: A-β-CD, acetyl-β-CD; APFO, ammonium perfluorooctanoate; CFSE, 5-

40

carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester; CILs, chiral ionic liquids; CNTs, carbon nanotubes;

41

CM-β-CD, carboxymethyl-β-CD; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DM-β-CD, 2,6-dimethyl-β-CD;

42

EBC, exhaled breath condensate; FASI, field-amplified sample injection; FASS, field-

43

amplified sample stacking; FMOC, 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chloride; FLEC, (+)-1-(92

44

fluorenyl)

ethyl

chloroformate;

FITC,

fluorescein

45

hydroxypropyl-γ-CD; LEKC, liposome EKC; M-β-CD, methyl-β-CD; NPs, nanoparticles;

46

OS-γ-CD, octa (6-O-sulfo)-γ-CD; LE-CEC, open tubular ligand exchange CEC; succ-γ-CD,

47

succinyl-γ-CD; S-α-CD, sulfated α-CD; S-β-CD, sulfated β-CD; S-γ-CD, sulfated γ-CD;

48

TM-β-CD, (2,3,6-tri-O-methyl)-β-CD; SBE-β-CD, sulfobutyl ether-β-CD.

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

3

isothiocyanate;

HP-γ-CD,

2-

62

1. Introduction

63

Chiral analysis is nowadays one of the most interesting areas within Analytical

64

Chemistry. This interest arises from the different properties that the enantiomers of a chiral

65

compound may have which originates the need to achieve their individual determination

66

[1]. As enantiomers of chiral drugs, food components or additives, agrochemicals or

67

pollutants can exhibit different biological activity, toxicity, degradation rates, persistence,

68

and other properties, the relevance of chiral analysis includes very different fields such as

69

the pharmaceutical, biomedical, food or environmental, among others [2-4].

70

Separation techniques are very powerful tools to achieve chiral analyses. Among

71

them, liquid chromatography (LC), gas chromatography (GC), supercritical fluid

72

chromatography (SFC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) have been the most employed

73

[5]. Although LC has been the most frequently used, CE has shown to have very interesting

74

characteristics to carry out enantiomeric separations [1] and it has had an important impact

75

in the last years as it can be observed in Figure 1 which shows the number of publications

76

dealing with chiral analysis using different analytical techniques from 2015.

77

On the one hand, chiral analysis benefits from some inherent characteristics of CE

78

such as its high efficiency and resolution, low consumption of reagents and samples or

79

short

80

electrophoretic principles can be applied to increase the sensitivity of the developed

81

methodologies which can also be enhanced using detection systems such as fluorescence or

82

mass spectrometry (MS), among others. On the other hand, the possibility of adding the

83

chiral selector directly to the separation medium in the so-called Electrokinetic

84

Chromatography (EKC) mode confers a high flexibility to chiral CE since the nature of the

analysis

times.

Also,

in-capillary

4

preconcentration

techniques

based

on

85

selector (or mixture of chiral selectors) and also its concentration can easily be changed

86

favoring the separation of enantiomers and reducing the economic costs derived from the

87

use of chiral chromatographic columns. The big variety of chiral selectors that can be

88

employed in EKC also contributes to increase the flexibility of CE to achieve an

89

enantiomeric separation [6]. In addition, the low amounts of reagents, solvents and samples

90

needed in CE fits well in the principles of green chemistry and reduces the environmental

91

impact of the developed methodologies. Although a chiral stationary phase can also be

92

employed in Capillary Electrochromatography (CEC) [7], EKC is by far the most employed

93

mode to perform enantiomeric separations in the format of CE as it will be shown in next

94

sections.

95

Numerous reviews devoted to chiral analysis by CE have been published in the last

96

years showing the high interest of this subject in different research fields. Table 1 groups

97

some of the most representative and recent review articles focused on general aspects of

98

enantiomeric separations by CE such as the current trends and future directions [8], the

99

history and contemporary theory of this technique as well as the study of the mechanisms

100

of non-covalent (enantioselective) interactions in different disciplines [9] or the potential of

101

different chiral selectors such as sugar-, amino acid-, nucleic acid-based polymers and ionic

102

liquids, among others [6, 10-12]. Although not included in this Table, other articles devoted

103

to review more specific and applied aspects of chiral CE have also been recently published

104

such as its application in food, environmental and pharmaceutical analysis [2-4, 13].

105

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the most relevant contributions

106

of CE to chiral separations paying special attention to the most innovative and recent

107

developments and improvements achieved. The fundamentals and characteristics of chiral 5

108

CE are also included and the most noteworthy applications to the analysis of real samples

109

in different fields reported in the last years will also be critically discussed.

110

2. Fundamentals and characteristics of chiral CE

111

CE separation principle relies on differences in the effective mobilities of the given

112

species in a narrow silica capillary (e.g. 50 µm internal diameter) under an electric field.

113

This effective mobility is defined as the sum vector of the electrophoretic mobility and the

114

mobility of the so-called electroosmotic flow (EOF). Silanol groups from the inner surface

115

of a fused-silica capillary are ionized above pH 3. At this or higher pH, positive ions from

116

the electrolyte solution, more widely known as background electrolyte (BGE), will then be

117

attracted by the negative wall generated by the silanol groups, forming a double layer.

118

Applying an electric voltage to the capillary ends will result in a flow of cations towards the

119

cathode. This flow, i.e. the EOF, will drag the bulk solution on this direction. Thus,

120

considering a cathodic detection, positively charged molecules will reach the detector first,

121

followed by neutral species (null electrophoretic mobility) and negatively charged

122

molecules will then follow. Note that both the size and charge of the molecule will also

123

play a role in the effective mobility since the electrophoretic mobility is proportional to the

124

effective charge and indirectly proportional to the radius. Detection of negatively charged

125

species will only be achieved if the EOF is able to counteract their electrophoretic mobility

126

towards the anode. It is clear that this is the most simplistic way, but the enormous

127

flexibility of CE opens a wide array of possibilities. This simple scenario can be further

128

modified, if, for instance, coated capillaries are used. There is a high number of works

129

reported in literature showing the different capillary coatings [14]. This coating can be

6

130

temporary, meaning that it will have to be renewed in every analytical run, or can be

131

permanent, when the coat is covalently attached to the capillary inner surface.

132

CE offers higher efficiency obtaining narrower peaks typically with higher

133

resolution because of the flat flow occurring in the capillary opposed to the parabolic flow

134

found in LC. This also results in a larger peak capacity in CE, having a million theoretical

135

plates. Among the other different advantages of CE over LC, it is of relevance to highlight

136

the minimal requirements for sample and solvent consumption. Typically, sample injection

137

in CE is in the nanoliter range compared to the microliter range for LC. The inherent

138

dimensions of CE make it a miniaturized technique with minimal waste and therefore,

139

reduced environmental impact.

140

However, when one wants to separate enantiomers a more difficult mechanism

141

needs to be applied. Enantiomers have identical physicochemical properties, hence, their

142

electrophoretic mobility will be exactly the same, and enantioseparation will only be

143

possible under a chiral environment, e.g. interaction with a chiral selector. Typically, this

144

interaction is non-covalent (usually, van der Waals forces or hydrogen bonding are

145

involved), which origins the formation of temporary diastereoisomers complexes which are

146

then separated based on their different mobilities in the so-called direct mode. On the other

147

hand, and used to a much lower extent is the indirect mode in which each enantiomer is

148

covalently linked to an enantiopure chiral derivatization reagent. These two new molecules

149

are now diastereoisomers, thus, the differences in their physicochemical properties will

150

enable their separation under achiral conditions. The less popularity of this later approach is

151

due to the fact that the availability of these chiral derivatization reagents is limited and they

152

must be of high enantiomeric purity. Their high cost and also the time-consuming step 7

153

consequence of the derivatization makes it a not desired approach. Considering that the

154

direct mode is the approach most used in CE, we will further discuss its features.

155

Overall, chiral separations in CE are based on two mechanisms, one

156

chromatographic and the other electrophoretic. The chromatographic mechanism arises

157

from the differences in the complexation constants between the enantiomers and the chiral

158

selector. The electrophoretic mechanism is based on the different electrophoretic mobilities

159

that the two enantiomer-chiral selector complexes might have due to subtle differences in

160

size of these complexes, if an analyte is more or less “embedded” in the chiral selector. For

161

further details on mechanisms on enantioseparations in CE, readers are redirected to

162

previous contributions [15].

163

Now, it is important to describe the two approaches used to carry out chiral

164

separations in CE: EKC and CEC. In EKC, which is by far the most used mode, the chiral

165

selector is solved in the BGE forming a “pseudo-stationary phase” making the interaction

166

with the analyte happen in the liquid state and, if it shows enantiorecognition, it will enable

167

the enantioseparation. Several chiral selectors are currently available in CE but nowadays

168

there is an ongoing search to find more CE suitable chiral selectors with exceptional

169

properties. Among the available chiral selectors, cyclodextrins (CDs) deserve a special

170

mention. CDs are cyclic oligosaccharides composed of mainly 6 (α-CD), 7 (β-CD) or 8 (γ-

171

CD) α-D-glucopyranoside units linked via 1-4 bonds and are produced from starch via

172

enzymatic treatment. These “donut”-shaped molecules have secondary and primary

173

hydroxyl groups exposed on the outside, making the outside hydrophilic and the inside

174

hydrophobic. Depending on the interaction, enantiorecognition can be performed both in

175

the inside and/or in the outside. Several research groups have aimed their efforts on 8

176

obtaining a deeper understanding on the mechanisms of this interaction. Nuclear magnetic

177

resonance (NMR), often in combination with molecular modelling, is typically used to

178

study the nature of such interaction [16]. Native CDs can be chemically modified via

179

hydroxyl-derivatization to change their enantioselectivity, enhancing the applicability of

180

these molecules as chiral selectors. Note that the use of single-isomer CD derivatives is

181

advantageous compared to the ones with random substitution for reproducibility reasons.

182

However, single-isomer CDs prices are still somehow prohibited.

183

Other chiral selectors used in EKC are chiral surfactants. When working above the

184

so-called critical micelle concentration (CMC) they will be in the micelle state, i.e.

185

spherical-like aggregates of surfactant molecules in which the hydrophilic heads are in

186

direct contact with the solvent whereas the hydrophobic tails are embedded in the middle of

187

the micelle aggregate. Other chiral selectors falling under EKC mode are ligand-exchange

188

compounds, proteins, bile salts, polysaccharides, ionic liquids, chiral crown ethers,

189

nucleotides, and antibiotics, among others. Readers are encouraged to go to different

190

reviews for detailed description on this topic [10, 17-20].

191

Unlike in EKC, in CEC, chiral stationary phases are employed. CEC is considered

192

to be in between electrophoretic and chromatographic techniques since it combines

193

characteristics of both. The mechanisms of separation of enantiomers in CEC are due to the

194

electrophoretic mobility of the charged analytes and their partition between the chiral

195

stationary phase and their free state in the mobile phase. There are three types of columns

196

in CEC: packed, open tubular, and monolithic columns, depending on how the chiral

197

stationary phase is placed in the capillary. Since this CE mode has not been widely reported

198

in last years, readers are redirected to previously published contributions on the matter [21]. 9

199

Even though the most used media in chiral separations are based on aqueous

200

solvents, CE also enables the possibility to work under non-aqueous conditions in the so

201

called non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis (NACE). This mode is indicated when the

202

analytes of interest or the chiral selectors are not soluble in water. The most common chiral

203

selectors employed in NACE are neutral and charged cyclodextrins as well as ion-pair

204

selectors and antibiotics [15]. Some advantages of NACE include shorter analysis times

205

with higher reproducibility thanks to the less Joule heat produced even at high voltages, as

206

well as more suitable coupling to MS detection [22]. Although there is a wide array of non-

207

aqueous solvents used, methanol is the most popular one. To favor charge of the analytes, it

208

is also needed to add an electrolyte to the non-aqueous solvent, such as formic or acetic

209

acid with or without the corresponding salt (ammonium formate or acetate). Although

210

NACE enables to achieve chiral separations, as we will see in coming sections, this CE

211

mode has scarcely been employed compared with EKC.

212

3. Advances in chiral CE

213

From the middle of 1980s when the first applications of CE in the field of chiral

214

separations were published, this technique has shown its attractive capabilities to achieve

215

highly efficient separations of enantiomers. Although the use of CE is not an easy task (it

216

effectively requires trained and skilled researchers and, above all, a lot of patience and

217

dedication as Fanali and Chankvetadze have recently pointed out [8]), from 1990 to 2010s,

218

there was a high interest in the scientific community to explore and exploit its inherent

219

advantages so that, great efforts were focused on the development of technological and

220

methodological improvements. Since then, other areas have attracted the researchers’s

221

attention affecting the development and applications of chiral CE. Nevertheless, even 10

222

though nowadays CE is a well-established separation technique (mainly in the EKC mode),

223

its full potential has not yet been reached and there are still significant challenges to face.

224

Currently, one of the most emerging research areas in chiral CE is the search of

225

novel chiral selectors. In fact, a considerable number of reviews have examined this topic

226

(some representative and recent examples are included in Table 1). Although, as it will be

227

illustrated in section 4, the use of single CDs or combinations of CDs remains the most

228

popular separation system in chiral CE, numerous researchers have focused their efforts on

229

the evaluation of other alternatives. Sonnendecker et al. demonstrated in an interesting

230

work, the discrimination power of large-ring CDs (single CDs composed of 10 to 12

231

glucose units) in the CE separation of chiral drugs [23]. On the other hand, one of the most

232

popular area in the search of novel chiral selectors is the use of chiral ionic liquids (CILs)

233

which have either a chiral cation, a chiral anion, or both in their structure. From the first

234

enantioseparations obtained using CILs as chiral selectors [24, 25], the number of

235

applications in this field has kept growing. Although some works have shown the

236

possibility of using CILs as single chiral selectors [26], they are mainly used in

237

combination with other chiral selectors (mostly CDs or macrocyclic antibiotics). In this

238

way, they can bring extra enantiorecognition ability while retaining the system modification

239

capability of achiral ionic liquids, so that the enantioseparations can be significantly

240

improved due to the cooperation between both selectors through a synergistic effect. In this

241

point, it should be mentioned that CILs have generated a considerable controversy among

242

the scientists since some of them claim that the addition of the synthesized CIL to the

243

separation buffer implies that it is no longer a CIL but a mixture of independent cations and

244

anions. Therefore, the addition of these anions or cations should work in the same manner

11

245

as the synthesized CIL [11]. However, some works have reported that the addition of CILs

246

gave rise to better results than the addition of their separated ions [27]. More research work

247

is necessary to provide a higher understanding on this subject. Nevertheless, regardless of

248

the mechanisms involved, the fact is that an important number of recent works reported the

249

synthesis of new CILs and their evaluation as chiral selectors in CE [28-30]. Readers

250

interested on gaining deeper insight on the use of CILs in chiral CE are referred to some

251

excellent recent review papers [10, 11, 31]. In addition to CILs, other compounds have also

252

been evaluated as chiral selectors over the last years. For instance, some articles have

253

shown for the first time the enantioseparation abilities of rifampicin [32], doxycycline [33],

254

clarithromycin lactobionate in combination with neutral CD derivatives [34], erythromycin

255

through the use of a carbamoylated erythromycin-zirconia hybrid monolithic column in

256

CEC [35], amino triazolium-modified lactobionic acid [36], or chondroitin sulfate D in

257

combination with a β-CD derivative [37].

258

It is worthy to mention that the use of nanoparticles (NPs) (quantum dots, gold NPs,

259

silica NPs, or carbon nanotubes (CNTs), among others) to improve chiral CE separations in

260

terms of efficiency and resolution, is receiving a significant attention [38]. Chiral selector

261

modified NPs can be bound to a capillary column in CE [39] or added to the buffer solution

262

[40] which confers a high flexibility to the choice of the chiral selector. Between these two

263

approaches, the second one may be, a priori, of greater interest due to some advantages

264

such as easier performance, no need to prepare a column, and no residual effect of

265

stationary phase. In any case, this research area is still far from reaching its full potential so

266

that it is foreseeable that new methodologies based on the use of NPs will be developed in

267

the next years.

12

268

Other important aspect to be considered is the limited concentration sensitivity that

269

can be obtained when using UV detection that is the most employed detection system in

270

chiral CE. The main strategies used to overcome this limitation are focused on the use of

271

preconcentration strategies based on electrophoretic principles or alternative detection

272

systems. Of course, chiral CE can also benefit from the advances and new developments

273

achieved in the field of off-line sample preparation techniques but these techniques will not

274

be commented here. The preferred preconcentration techniques based on electrophoretic

275

principles to improve the detection sensitivity are in-line (carried out within the capillary)

276

or on-line (in a completely integrated and automated manner) sample treatment. Among

277

them, field-amplified sample stacking (FASS), field-amplified sample injection (FASI),

278

and sweeping are usually the most employed in chiral CE analysis to improve the

279

sensitivity not only when UV detection is employed but also with other detectors such as

280

MS. The fundamentals of these preconcentration strategies are already well-known so the

281

developments in this area are being related mainly with the finding of the appropriate

282

combination of some of them in order to achieve the highest sensitivity as illustrated in

283

section 4. Regarding the use of alternative detection systems, laser induced fluorescence

284

(LIF) or MS detectors continue being the preferred ones although LIF detection implies the

285

need of molecule labeling as an essential step prior to CE analysis. By adding a

286

derivatization step, sample treatment becomes more tedious, leading in most cases to

287

derivatization problems when complex matrices are analyzed. Even so, different works

288

published in the last years demonstrated the potential of LIF as detection mode to carry out

289

the chiral analysis of different compounds in real samples enabling to achieve LODs in the

290

nM and sub-pM range [41, 42]. With respect to the CE-MS coupling, two interesting

291

review articles have been published in the last years. On the one hand, Jiang et al. described 13

292

the recent advances of CE-MS instrumentation and methodology in a general way [43]

293

whereas Liu and Shamsi´s review was focused directly on chiral CE-MS [44]. The main

294

limitation of MS detection in chiral CE is due to the incompatibility of nonvolatile chiral

295

selectors frequently employed that may cause ion suppression and contamination of the

296

ionization source leading to a sensitivity decrease. In some cases, it is possible to use a low

297

concentration of chiral selector to achieve a complete enantioseparation without a loss in

298

MS sensitivity [45, 46]. However, in many cases, the presence of nonvolatile chiral

299

selectors in the MS chamber should be avoided. In this line, different authors proposed

300

MEKC-MS methodologies based on the use of (+)-1-(9-fluorenyl) ethyl chloroformate

301

(FLEC) as chiral derivatization reagent to form stable diastereomers with the enantiomers

302

of

303

perfluorooctanoate (APFO) as a volatile pseudostationary phase [47, 48]. Other possibility

304

when the presence of a chiral selector is imperative is the use of chiral stationary phases

305

(CEC mode) or volatile chiral selectors such as polymeric micelles [49]. Nevertheless, the

306

most used strategies to improve the applicability of CE-MS to chiral analysis are those

307

based on the use of the counter migration or partial filling techniques [50]. The

308

combination of a preconcentration strategy with LIF or MS detection appears as the most

309

powerful way to reach a high sensitivity in chiral analysis by CE. This fact has been

310

illustrated in different works such as those reported by Patel et al. and Piestansky et al. who

311

developed chiral methodologies for the ultra-trace chiral determination of two protein

312

amino acids or pheniramine and its metabolite in single neurons or human urine,

313

respectively [41, 51].

the

chiral

compounds

and

their

subsequent

14

separation

using

ammonium

314

The combination of chiral CE with NMR spectroscopy, MS and computation

315

methodologies (molecular modeling and molecular mechanics calculations) is another

316

interesting and relevant area through which it is possible to obtain data related to the

317

mechanistic aspects of selector-selectand interactions [8, 9]. The high peak efficiency that

318

can be achieved in CE makes this separation technique a powerful tool for studying non-

319

covalent intermolecular interactions. In this way, a higher understanding of the enantiomer

320

separation mechanisms on the molecular level is provided. Even though this research is

321

constantly evolving and a high number of works have been published in the last five years

322

to determine the intermolecular interactions between different chiral compounds and chiral

323

selectors [36, 46, 52, 53], we are still far from understanding the nature of the forces

324

involved in the chiral recognition, especially when dual chiral systems are employed.

325

326

4. Applications of CE to chiral analysis

327

Due to its great versatility, CE enables the analysis of numerous chiral compounds

328

in a wide variety of samples in different fields such as the pharmaceutical, biomedical, or

329

food analysis, among others. Here, the most relevant and recent applications of CE to the

330

analysis of chiral compounds in real samples are included.

331

332

4.1. Pharmaceutical analysis

333

In the last years, new CE methods enabling the enantiomeric determination of drugs

334

in pharmaceutical formulations were developed and validated according to the International

335

Conference on Harmonisation guidelines (ICH guidelines). Some of the most relevant and 15

336

recent works published are grouped in Table 2. EKC using CDs as chiral selectors is the

337

most frequent approach, and the most frequent detection mode was UV, used in all cases

338

except in one in which LIF detection was employed.

339

The enantiomeric analysis of drugs marketed as pure enantiomers continues being a

340

challenge because a low amount of the enantiomeric impurity has to be detected in the

341

presence of the majority enantiomer. In fact, ICH guidelines establish that the presence of

342

the impurity enantiomer cannot be higher than 0.1% of the majority enantiomer [76]. This

343

requires a considerable enantiomeric resolution to avoid the overlapping of the majority

344

peak and the enantiomeric impurity peak, and a high sensitivity enabling the detection of

345

the enantiomeric impurity at such low concentrations. In this context, there is another

346

interesting factor affecting the determination of the enantiomeric impurity, which is the

347

enantiomer migration order. In fact, unless high enantiomeric resolutions are possible, it is

348

desirable that the enantiomeric impurity is the first-migrating enantiomer, this avoiding the

349

overlapping of the majority peak with that corresponding to the impurity. Taking into

350

account the importance of the enantiomeric resolution obtained and that the “one factor at

351

time” method to optimize the experimental conditions that influence the chiral separation is

352

time-consuming, the use of experimental designs is recommended. Some methodologies

353

combined both strategies, i.e. the “one factor at time” approach was employed to fix some

354

variables influencing the enantiomeric resolution and subsequently a multivariate

355

optimization was used to select others. For example, the development of a stereoselective

356

MEKC method for the simultaneous determination of montelukast enantiomers and

357

diastereomers and its degradation products was based on the evaluation of the influence of

358

some parameters by the trial-and-error approach and the use of a full factorial design to

16

359

investigate the effect of buffer pH and voltage on the resolution between montelukast

360

enantiomers [54]. Under the best separation conditions (see Table 2), and after evaluating

361

the analytical characteristics and the robustness of the method, the developed methodology

362

was applied to the determination of the above-mentioned isomers in bulk drugs, pouches

363

and tablets. The combination of the “one factor at time” approach and a central composite

364

face centered design was also applied to the optimization of the enantiomeric separation of

365

tramadol, a drug marketed as racemate [55].

366

A relevant point in the pharmaceutical industry for the development of CE

367

methodologies suitable to evaluate the enantiomeric purity of drugs marketed as pure

368

enantiomers is the application of Quality by Design (QbD) approaches. In fact, better

369

analytical methods can be developed applying the QbD principles. Briefly, QbD involves

370

the definition of the analytical target profile (for example, the determination of the main

371

compound and its chiral impurity at the 0.1% level with a resolution value > 2.0 in an

372

analysis time < 10 min), the identification of the critical process variables (buffer

373

concentration and pH, chiral selector concentration, voltage, temperature, etc) affecting the

374

critical quality attributes (resolution and analysis time), and the establishment of the design

375

space (that reflects the experimental conditions under which the analytical target is

376

reached). Fractional factorial resolution designs are usually employed for the identification

377

of the critical parameters. The most relevant are subsequently optimized using central

378

composite face centered designs and Monte Carlo simulations to define the design space.

379

Different works published in the last years reported the application of QbD approaches to

380

the development of CE methodologies for the chiral purity determination of drugs such as

381

ambrisentan [56], levomepromazine [57], dextromethorphan [58], dapoxetine [59], and

17

382

levosulpiride [60]. In some of these works, the analytical target profile comprises not only

383

the determination of the enantiomeric impurity but also its simultaneous analysis with other

384

impurities [57, 59]. The experimental conditions selected (using the above-mentioned

385

experimental designs) in all these CE methodologies are detailed in Table 2. Placket-

386

Burman designs were performed to assess the robustness, and all the developed

387

methodologies were validated according to ICH guidelines. In all cases, the application of

388

these methodologies to pharmaceutical formulations allowed the determination of

389

enantiomeric impurities at levels of 0.1% [56, 57, 58], 0.27% [60] or in the 0.05-1.0%

390

range [59].

391

Despite the application of experimental designs is advisable, different works

392

reported systematic screenings using the principle of “one factor at time” to select the most

393

adequate experimental conditions for the determination of the enantiomeric purity of drugs

394

marketed as pure enantiomers. For instance, using acetyl-β-CD (A-β-CD) as chiral selector

395

in a basic buffer, it was possible to determine the chiral purity of valsartan in tablets at the

396

0.01% level without interferences from the excipients [61]. In spite of the migration order

397

was not the most adequate (the minor component migrated after the major one), this is the

398

contribution of chiral CE to pharmaceutical analysis reporting the lowest relative LOD in

399

the last five years. In addition, the application of this methodology to two commercial

400

brands of tablets enabled to determine the enantiomeric impurity at percentages of 0.12%

401

and 0.22% revealing that ICH guidelines were not accomplished [61]. In the case of the

402

enantiomeric purity control of R-cinacalcet in tablets, the use of an EKC methodology

403

based on the use of 2-hydroxypropyl-γ-CD (HP-γ-CD) as chiral selector allowed for the

404

first time the separation of these enantiomers allowing a favorable migration order, i.e. the

18

405

S-enantiomer was the first-migrating enantiomer [62]. All the tablets analyzed by this

406

method accomplished the ICH regulations since the enantiomeric impurity was in all cases

407

below a 0.1%.

408

As it has been mentioned in section 3, the combination of chiral CE with NMR and

409

molecular modeling studies makes possible to obtain data related to the mechanistic aspects

410

of selector-selectand interactions. Two works published in the last five years reported the

411

development, optimization and validation of EKC-UV methodologies for the enantiomeric

412

quality control of enantiomerically pure drugs and applied NMR and molecular modeling

413

for the characterization of intermolecular interactions between drugs and CDs [63, 64]. On

414

the one hand, Menéndez-López et al. developed an EKC method using two different CDs,

415

succinyl-γ-CD (succ-γ-CD) and S-γ-CD, as chiral selectors for the first CE separation of

416

colchicine enantiomers [63]. Although the enantiomeric impurity migrated in the first place

417

using S-γ-CD, just the use of succ-γ-CD allowed to detect this impurity at a level of 0.1%.

418

Apparent and averaged equilibrium constants for the enantiomer-Succ-γ-CD complexes

419

were calculated by NMR, suggesting that the electrophoretic mobility of these complexes

420

was the predominant factor in the enantiomer migration order. On the other hand, Szabó et

421

al. developed a pressure-assisted EKC-UV with sulfobutyl ether-β-CD (SBE-β-CD) as

422

chiral selector to carry out for the first time the determination of the enantiomeric purity of

423

rasagiline [64]. Binding affinities of the individual enantiomers towards the CD were

424

investigated using both NMR and molecular modeling demonstrating the formation of a

425

more stable inclusion complex between the CD and the enantiomeric impurity which was in

426

accordance with the enantiomer migration order obtained by CE analysis.

19

427

Although EKC with UV detection is the preferred system to perform the evaluation

428

of enantiomeric purity in pharmaceutical formulations (see Table 2), LIF has also been

429

used for the purity control of magnesium L-aspartate dihydrate in two batch samples and

430

three drugs products [65]. Data obtained by the developed EKC-LIF methodology, based

431

on the use of a basic buffer containing HP-β-CD, were compared to those obtained by using

432

a LC-fluorescence method with chiral derivatization. Although the LC method had a higher

433

sensitivity (LOQ of D-aspartate: 0.006% vs 0.03%), both methodologies were suitable for

434

the control of the enantiomeric purity.

435

It is worthy to note that even if some drugs are nowadays marketed as racemates,

436

the studies carried out to achieve their enantiomeric separation when the biological activity

437

of both enantiomers differs, present a high interest taking into account that they could be

438

marketed as pure enantiomers in a near future. Drug racemates enantiomerically separated

439

in the last years include the antihypertensive amlodipine [66], carvedilol [67] and

440

lercanidipine [68] using neutral CDs as chiral selectors such as methyl-β-CD (M-β-CD), β-

441

CD, (2,3,6-tri-O-methyl)-β-CD (TM-β-CD), respectively. The enantiomeric separation of

442

the β-blocker pindolol was also achieved by EKC using an octa(6-O-sulfo)-γ-CD (OS-γ-

443

CD) [69]. Analyte-chiral selector complexation constants were determined, and a software

444

tool was proposed to predict the separation time and other variables from the complexation

445

constants and mobilities of complexes of both enantiomers. Although these four drugs are

446

marketed as racemates, a higher pharmaceutical activity was reported for their (S)-

447

enantiomers. The antiparasitic praziquantel is also commercialized as racemate even though

448

the (R)-enantiomer is the only responsible for its activity. This drug is employed in the

449

prevention and treatment of the tropical disease schistosomiasis (bilharziasis). 20

The

450

quantitation of (R)-praziquantel in tablets was achieved by EKC using S-β-CD as chiral

451

selector [70]. Other antiparasitic compounds present in the samples did not cause

452

interferences.

453

CDs were not the only chiral selectors employed for the enantiomeric determination

454

of drug racemates. In fact, the use of a maltodextrin as chiral selector enabled the

455

simultaneous stereoselective separation of tramadol and methadone not only in tablets but

456

also in biological fluids such as urine and plasma [71]. This was the first time that this

457

chiral selector was used to separate methadone. Researchers claim that the use of

458

maltodextrins shows some advantages over other chiral selectors because they are cost-

459

effective and allow efficient chiral separations.

460

An interesting approach to determine the enantiomeric excess of chiral drugs is the

461

use of the velocity gap mode of CE (VGCE) [72]. This strategy enables to carry out the

462

enantiomeric excess measurement even when the chiral selector does not provide enough

463

resolving power. This is of high relevance in those cases where the content of one

464

enantiomer is significantly higher than the other one. VGCE is based on the fractionation of

465

a small part of the mixture that contains both enantiomers from the main component (which

466

is already enantiopure). Then, the enantioseparation of the small fraction can be achieved

467

due to less longitudinal dispersion. The suitability of this methodology was demonstrated

468

by analyzing levamlodipine besytate tablet as it is illustrated in Figure 2 [72].

469

The potential of a liposome electrokinetic capillary chromatography (LEKC) was

470

evaluated for the enantioseparation of different model drugs and applied to test the chiral

471

impurity of naproxen samples [73]. The chiral separation was carried out employing

472

liposomes comprised of phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol as pseudo-stationary phase 21

473

and SBE-β-CD as chiral selector. The results obtained demonstrated that the

474

enantioseparation increased by using this separation system in comparison with the use of

475

single SBE-β-CD system and SBE-SDS-MEKC system.

476

Even though the most popular approach in chiral separations by CE is based on

477

aqueous solvents, NACE has also been used in drug analysis. Different β-blockers and β -

478

agonists were enantioseparated using a NACE methodology based on the use of boric acid

479

derivatives as new chiral selectors. Lactobionic acid-boric 9 acid complex and D-(+)-

480

xylose-boric acid complex were applied to the chiral separation of propranolol [74] whereas

481

diacetone-D-mannitol-boric acid complex was employed to carry out the enantioseparation

482

of seven β-agonists [75]. In both cases, the chiral selectors were in situ synthesized. The

483

developed NACE methods were successfully applied to the chiral separation of propranolol

484

in tablets [74] and the determination of clenbuterol in an oral solution [75].

485

486

4.2. Bioanalysis

487

CE has also proven its powerfulness in the chiral separation of analytes present in

488

biological samples such as plasma, urine, or even single neurons. These remarkable

489

research works are included in Table 3 and will be further detailed paying attention to

490

different aspects as the chiral selector used or the sensitivity reached. UV, MS and LIF

491

have been the detector systems used in the analysis of biological samples. It is relevant to

492

highlight that in most cases at least a preconcentration strategy was employed.

493

EKC-UV is typically used in combination with preconcentration strategies in the

494

bioanalysis field. This mode has been used to analyze mainly urine and plasma but analysis 22

495

of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) has also been reported [77]. There, authors separated

496

methadone enantiomers using carboxymethyl-β-CD (CM-β-CD) in an acidic medium,

497

included a FASS procedure, reaching LOQs in the µg/mL range. Authors applied the

498

method to analyze EBC collected from patients following methadone maintenance therapy.

499

Concentrations of both enantiomers of methadone in EBC poorly correlated to the ones

500

obtained in urine and serum [77].

501

An API derived from pyroglutamic acid, containing two chiral centers, was also

502

enantioseparated by EKC-UV [78]. Researchers employed S-β-CD as chiral selector and

503

validated the method according to the ICH guidelines. Application was conducted to

504

quality control in bulk material and in the investigation of in vivo inversion in rat plasma, to

505

evaluate the degradation of this drug occurring upon metabolization. LODs as low as ppb

506

were obtained thanks to the utilization of cation-selective exhaustive injection (CSEI)-

507

sweeping. Results showed that there were no in vivo racemization upon the intake of this

508

drug, which confirmed the viability of the commercialization of this product as a single

509

enantiomer. Another metabolization study, this time of ketamine and its metabolites was

510

also conducted by EKC-UV using S-γ-CD [79]. Dogs treated with sevoflurane or

511

medetomidine co-administered with ketamine (racemic or (S)-ketamine). Results showed

512

stereoselective metabolism occurring for metabolites 6-hydroxynorketamine and 5,6-

513

dehydronorketamine in plasma but not for ketamine and norketamine, its main metabolite.

514

Using another sulfated CD, this time sulfated-β-CD (S-β-CD), researchers separated

515

pheniramine enantiomers in rat plasma employing an EKC-UV setup [80]. Large volume

516

sample stacking (LVSS) and CSEI-stacking gave rise to a considerable improvement in the

23

517

sensitivity of 600 and 4000 times, respectively, when compared to not using

518

preconcentration approach.

519

Bioanalysis is the application field in which EKC-MS has been used to a larger

520

extent. This is because higher sensitivity is needed in the analysis of biological samples.

521

Sensitivity is often times not met by EKC-UV even if preconcentration strategies are used.

522

This is the case of a work reporting the development of a method based on ITP and MS

523

detection. The LODs in the pg/mL level were enough to enable its application to study the

524

enantioselective metabolism of pheniramine and its metabolite, desmethyl pheniramine, in

525

human urine samples obtained at different times after administration of racemic

526

pheniramine [51]. This method achieved about 125 times better sensitivity than the above-

527

mentioned method for pheniramines, based on EKC-UV [80]. Note that together with Patel

528

et al. contribution [41], this is the lowest LODs reported for a bioanalysis application and

529

all applications included in the present article altogether. In a recent and very

530

comprehensive publication [46], Liu et al. used EKC-MS to enantioseparate the four

531

stereoisomers

532

hydroxyaspartate. Low concentration of chiral selector (β-CD) was used to minimize MS-

533

source contamination. LVSS with polarity switching enabled a 10-fold increase in

534

sensitivity, reaching LODs as low as 87 nM in rat cerebrospinal fluid samples (CSF).

of

9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl

chloride

(FMOC)

labeled

3-

535

Protein amino acids are paramount metabolites with high importance in living

536

organisms. A MEKC-MS approach using derivatization with FLEC for amino acid analysis

537

was developed by Prior et al. to analyze human CSF where levels of endogenous L-amino

538

acids were quantified [48]. Although low, levels of D-serine and D-glutamine were also

539

found in these samples. Another work by Prior et al. also reported the enantioseparation of 24

540

amino acids in CSF, this time, using FMOC as labelling agent and since it is not a chiral

541

labelling compound, a chiral selector, β-CD, was used [81]. Working with a concentration

542

of 10 mM β-CD did not cause much sensitivity decrement and was used filling up

543

completely the separation capillary. Another contribution focusing on amino acids and

544

related compounds was also reported [82]. There authors enantioseparated the constituents

545

of the phenylalanine-tyrosine metabolic pathway using an EKC-MS/MS platform combined

546

with LVSS. LODs of 40-150 nM were found. The method was validated in rat plasma in

547

which endogenous levels of L-phenylalanine and L-tyrosine could be measured. This

548

method is the one based on the use of largest amount of CD (180 mM M-β-CD + 40 mM

549

HP-β-CD). This might be considered as a disadvantage but thanks to the versatility and low

550

consumption of reagents in CE, especially when working in the partial filling technique

551

capillary, this drawback is reduced. The fact that molecules from the same metabolic

552

pathway are analyzed, i.e. closely structural-like compounds could have had an effect on

553

needing such large quantities of chiral selector and favor the enantiorecognition [82].

554

As anticipated earlier in this review article, CDs are by far the most used chiral

555

selectors, but some researchers also used alternative chiral selectors. For example,

556

Svidrnoch et al. who used vancomycin, a macrocyclic antibiotic having 18 chiral centers,

557

for the chiral separation of 2-hydroxyglutaric acid in an EKC-MS configuration [83].

558

Atypical levels of D-2-hydroxyglutaric acid were found in urine from child diagnosed with

559

hydroxyglutaric aciduria. This is a rapid and sensitive method to distinguish between D-

560

and L-2-hydroxyglutaraciduria. Another example is the work by Liu et al. developed a

561

MEKC-MS/MS method using poly-L,L-SULA as chiral selector, to study the

562

pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the enantiomers of both antidepressant drugs

25

563

venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine in human plasma [49]. The results suggested a

564

potential drug to drug interaction between indinavir (an inhibitor drug enabling to prevent

565

the breakage of polyproteins in patients with HIV) and these two antidepressants. This is

566

the only work reporting the use of chiral surfactants in the last years. These polymeric

567

surfactants are promising chiral selectors that are MS compatible but due to their limited

568

commercialization their application might be somehow compromised.

569

LIF detection offers high sensitivity and selectivity but demands sample

570

derivatization with a fluorescent tag. An EKC-LIF method by Patel et al. combined with

571

online preconcentration by LVSS improved the sensitivity 480 times also for the amino

572

acids aspartate and glutamate, reaching LODs in the sub-pM range [41] (Figure 3). This is

573

indeed the lowest LOD reported for chiral separations from last five years, together with

574

Pietansky et al [51]. Thanks to the high sensitivity of this approach it has been possible to

575

determine levels of D-aspartic and D-glutamic acids in single neurons isolated from the

576

neuronal model Aplysia californica. Differences in concentrations of these excitatory amino

577

acids were found depending on the clusters where the neurons were isolated from.

578

4.3. Food analysis

579

Chirality of a great variety of food components makes that their enantioselective

580

analysis has a significant role in food science and technology since it enables to obtain

581

information related to food quality, food processing, storage, or adulterations, among

582

others. Table 4 summarizes the characteristics of the most relevant and recent chiral CE

583

methodologies developed for food analysis in the last years. As this table shows, most of

584

these works are based on the use of CDs as chiral selectors and sometimes SDS is also

585

present in the BGE. As in pharmaceutical analysis, UV is the preferred detection system. 26

586

Different EKC methodologies have demonstrated their potential for the quality

587

control of food supplements [84, 85]. For instance, the enantioselective determination of

588

non-protein amino acids can provide information related to adulterations (the use of D-

589

enantiomers in the elaboration of dietary supplements is not allowed by legal regulations)

590

or food processing (fermentation, storage, etc). In this sense, different EKC methods based

591

on the use of anionic CDs (sulfated-α-CD (S-α-CD) or sulfated-γ-CD (S-γ-CD) depending

592

on the amino acid) were developed to carry out the enantiomeric separation of eight non-

593

protein amino acids previously labeled with FMOC [84]. After studying the effect of

594

different parameters, an optimized methodology using S-γ-CD as chiral selector was

595

applied to the enantiomeric analysis of citrulline in six food supplements. This method

596

enabled to reach LODs in the 10-7 M range. Data obtained demonstrated that the storage

597

time gave rise to a decrease in the amount of the L-enantiomer with respect to the labeled

598

content, but this effect could not be attributed to a racemization process since the D-

599

enantiomer was not detected in any of the samples analyzed [84]. Food supplements quality

600

can also be determined analyzing the origin of their constituents. A clear example of this

601

perspective is the enantioselective separation of 1,3-dimethylamylamine (DMAA) [85].

602

Using the combination of S-α-CD and S-β-CD in a chiral dual system and

603

benzyltriethylammonium chloride as chromophoric additive (to carry out an indirect UV

604

detection) it was possible to achieve the separation of the four DMMA diastereoisomers.

605

The application of this chiral method to the analysis of DMMA in dietary supplements

606

enabled to assume that DMMA probably was not of natural origin because its

607

diastereoisomeric ratios were identical to synthetic DMMA.

27

608

Geographical origin is also an important factor to determine the quality of

609

commercial tea products. One way to do that is using the content of cathechins and

610

methylxanthines as indicators. To do that, a MEKC method with HP-β-CD combined with

611

chemometric analysis was developed [86]. The presence of HP-β-CD in the BGE allowed

612

the enantioselective separation of some of the catechins ((+)-catechin, (‒)-catechin and (‒)-

613

epicatechin). Data obtained were evaluated using principal component and hierarchical

614

cluster analyses as exploratory techniques and by using discriminant models built using

615

linear and quadratic discriminant analyses. The results obtained demonstrated that the

616

developed methodology has a high potential to discriminate green tea samples according to

617

their geographical origin using catechines and methylxanthines as phytomarkers [86]. On

618

the other hand, the presence of (‒)-catechin and D-theanine (both considered as non-native

619

enantiomers) provides information of tea leaves treatment (fermentation, thermal treatment,

620

etc) which also enables to establish a tea classification. In this research line, Fiori et al.

621

developed a MEKC-UV methodology based on the use of SDS and 2,6-di-O-methyl-β-CD

622

(DM-β-CD) for the simultaneous enantioseparation of six major catechins and D,L-

623

theanine (previously derivatized with o-phtaldialdehyde in the presence of N-acetyl-L-

624

cystein) in green tea samples [87]. Once a set of different tea samples were analyzed, it was

625

possible to assign the presence of (‒)-catechin as indicator of a thermal degradation, and D-

626

theanine as marker of microbial or enzymatic processes.

627

The enantiomeric determination of protein amino acid in rice wine is an interesting

628

topic to obtain information about the wine age. For this reason, Miao et al. developed a

629

MEKC method for the determination of D-glutamic acid and D-aspartic acid (previously

630

derivatized with FMOC) in rice wine [88]. The method was based on the use of a dual

28

631

chiral system composed of β-CD and HP-β-CD, SDS, D-fructose (as additive) and

632

isopropanol (as organic modifier). Certain amounts of both D-amino acids were found in

633

the analyzed samples, but their percentage did not show a significant correlation with wine

634

age.

635

The potential of CE for the chiral analysis of lipids has also been demonstrated.

636

Analysis of hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids requires separating both regioisomers and

637

enantiomers which was achieved in 35 min using a BGE containing HP-γ-CD as chiral

638

selector and SDS [89]. To demonstrate the viability of this MEKC methodology, the chiral

639

analysis of 8-, and 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids in two species of red algae was carried

640

out.

641

It is interesting to highlight that even though CDs are the most employed chiral

642

selectors and UV is the preferred detection system, an EKC methodology based on the use

643

of a (-)-(18-crown-6)-2,3,11,12-tetracarboxylic acid (18C6H4) as selector and MS as

644

detection system has also been reported for the enantiomeric determination of underivatized

645

D,L-amino acids in three varieties of vinegar samples [50]. To avoid the contamination of

646

the ionization source due to the presence of the crown ether and make possible EKC-MS

647

hyphenation, the partial filling technique was employed. This provided LODs in the µg/mL

648

level and enabled the analysis of L and D enantiomers which gave information on the

649

fermentation degrees during the manufacturing process. The applicability of this

650

methodology could be extended to the sensitive determination of D,L-amino acids in other

651

samples.

652

The possibilities of ligand exchange, both in CE and in CEC (LE-CE and LE-CEC),

653

for the chiral analysis of short chain organic acids have also been demonstrated in the last 29

654

years. Aydogan et al., applied the ligand exchange principle in an open tubular CEC

655

column using copper (II) as central ion and L-histidine as chiral ligand. Using this

656

approach, it was possible to carry out the determination of D- and L-malic acid enantiomers

657

in apple juice with different dilutions, as Figure 4 shows [90]. On the other hand,

658

Kamencev et al. developed an alternative LE-CE method based on the combination of

659

copper (II)/aluminum (III)/D-quinic acid system and hexadecyltrimethylammonium

660

hydroxide (CTA-OH) to revert the EOF for the simultaneous enantiomeric separation of

661

DL-tartaric and DL-malic acids in wines [91]. While D-malic acid was determined in a

662

broad range of concentrations in different wines, D-tartaric acid was detected just in two of

663

the samples analyzed (at concentrations of 90 and 200 mg/L). It is worth noting that

664

whereas the use of DL-malic acid is allowed for wine acidification, the use of DL-tartaric

665

acid is not allowed. For this reason, the developed methodology acquires a high relevance,

666

especially from the winemaking point of view, since it enables the wine quality control

667

through the enantioselective determination of these short chain organic acids.

668

Until now, all the mentioned methodologies are based on direct approaches, which

669

as highlighted in the section 2, are the most commonly used in chiral separations. However,

670

two indirect strategies have also been described in the last five years. In one of them, D,L-

671

aldoses

672

dimethylaminosulfonyl)-7-(3-aminopyrrolidin-1-yl)-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole, were separated

673

in phenylboronate buffer containing SDS [92]. Under these conditions, and using LIF as

674

detection system, the enantiomeric separation of D,L-galactose in the hydrolysate of

675

commercial red seaweed samples was performed. The other work was focused on the

676

derivatization of selenomethionine with FLEC and their enantioselective separation

diastereomers,

formed

by

30

derivatization

with

(S)-(+)-4-(N,N-

677

employing APFO as pseudostationary phase [93]. The developed MEKC-UV methodology

678

was subsequently applied to the determination of L-selenomethionine in food supplements.

679

These two works demonstrate the usefulness of MEKC indirect approaches to the quality

680

control of edible marina algae and food supplements.

681

4.4. Environmental and forensic analysis

682

Chiral CE has also demonstrated its potential in the development of analytical

683

methodologies to be applied in other fields such as environmental and forensic analysis.

684

Table 5 groups some of the most relevant works published in the last years in these fields.

685

In the environmental field, different types of environmental waters (lake, river, ground,

686

wastewater) were the samples most frequently analyzed. Amino acids, drugs and herbicides

687

were enantiomerically determined. Native and derivatized CDs were the preferred chiral

688

selectors in these works to be used as the sole selectors or in dual systems based on

689

mixtures with other CDs or bile salts. In general, UV detection was employed although the

690

use of LIF detection was also reported. Due to the limited concentration sensitivity of UV

691

detection in CE and the low levels of these compounds in the analyzed samples,

692

preconcentration methods were employed to achieve the required sensitivity. With this aim,

693

new periodic mesoporous organosilica materials were synthesized and evaluated as

694

sorbents to carry out the solid-phase extraction of drugs and herbicides from water samples.

695

These novel mesoporous materials were synthesized with neutral ligands to be applied to

696

the preconcentration of a mixture of seven drugs of different characteristics [94] considered

697

as emergent pollutants and with cationic ligands to achieve the preconcentration of a group

698

of six herbicides [95]. The simultaneous separation of the fourteen enantiomers of these

699

drugs and the twelve enantiomers of the herbicides by CE enabled the application of the 31

700

developed methodologies to the determination of these compounds in different water

701

samples at µg/L levels. S-β-CD was employed as chiral selector for the simultaneous

702

enantiomeric determination by EKC of the seven studied drugs in 16 min and this method

703

was further optimized and applied to the evaluation of the enantiomer stability and the

704

toxicity of duloxetine and econazole on Daphnia magna [96]. The stability of these drugs

705

was studied under abiotic and biotic conditions. Figure 5 represents the analysis of

706

mixtures of both drugs. Figure 5A corresponds to an aqueous standard solution and Figure

707

5B to culture medium at zero time. In Figure 5C it can be observed that econazole

708

concentration was unstable and disappeared at 72 h of culture media incubation, the same

709

as in presence of Dapnhnia magna as shown in Figure 5D. Duloxetine concentration

710

decreased in presence of Dapnhnia magna (Figure 5D) [96]. On the other hand, the

711

simultaneous enantiomeric separation by EKC of the six herbicides studied in 11 min

712

required the use of a dual chiral system based on a mixture of TM-β-CD and HP-β-CD.

713

Other mesoporous silica materials were also developed to make possible the chiral analysis

714

of β-blockers by CE in water samples after their preconcentration by solid-phase extraction

715

[97, 98]. M-β-CD was employed as chiral selector enabling the simultaneous determination

716

of propranolol, atenolol, metoprolol and pindolol enantiomers in spiked water samples at

717

µg/l levels.

718

LIF detection was employed in the analysis of different amino acids in water

719

samples from the Mono Lake in USA that can be considered as an analogue for

720

astrobiologically revelant targets [42]. Two different methods were developed. One of them

721

was a MEKC method based on the use of a mixture of γ-CD and sodium taurocholate as

722

chiral system to study neutral amino acids and the other one was an EKC methodology

32

723

consisting of the use of γ-CD to analyze acidic amino acids. Sample preparation was easy

724

since no desalting or preconcentration procedures were necessary due to a derivatization

725

step with 5-carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE). The use of CFSE increased the

726

sensitivity 2 orders of magnitude compared to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)

727

derivatization.

728

Other interesting application of chiral CE is forensic analysis. CE can provide

729

relevant information related to the consumption of legal or illicit drugs and their

730

toxicological effects or about their origin and synthesis, among others [13]. Table 5 groups

731

detailed information of some of the most recent works published in relation with this type

732

of analysis. Seized samples of stimulant drugs, human hair and human blood are the

733

samples attracting most interest. CDs were the preferred chiral selectors and UV and MS

734

detection systems were employed. An EKC-MS method using S-γ-CD as chiral selector

735

was developed to carry out the analysis of eight amphetamine-like stimulants [99]. A

736

chemically modified capillary containing sulfonated groups was employed to improve the

737

migration times repeatability. This method was applied to two types of seized samples of

738

methamphetamine in order to detect impurities. (-)-ephedrine and (+)-ephedrine were

739

detected as impurities in both samples. The development of other EKC-MS method also

740

based on the use of S-γ-CD as chiral selector was reported and applied to the analysis of

741

twenty seized methamphetamine samples [45]. Results enabled to conclude that three of the

742

twenty samples were a mixture of R-methamphetamine and S-methamphetamine while the

743

rest of the samples contained only the S-enantiomer. This method could be used in the

744

analysis

745

methylenedioxyamphetamine, among others, thanks to the use of TOF-MS which provides

of

other

chiral

abuse

drugs

33

such

as

amphetamine

and

3,4-

746

unequivocal analyte identification. Seized samples were also analyzed by EKC-UV using

747

HP-β-CD as chiral selector. The regioisomeric and enantiomeric analysis of 24 design

748

cathinones and phenethylamines in these samples was reported [100]. The method

749

developed in this work was compared to a LC methodology with UV detection, using a

750

BEH Phenyl column as chiral stationary phase. The CE method was more advantageous, as

751

it resolved all 24 regioisomers while the LC method resolved 18 out of 24.

752

Regarding human hair and blood samples, an EKC-UV method using S-γ-CD as

753

chiral selector was proposed for the chiral separation of ketamine and norketamine which is

754

its principal metabolite, in hair samples from twelve ketamine abusers [101]. Ketamine is a

755

dissociative drug with analgesic, anesthetic and sedative properties. In order to carry out the

756

analysis of these compounds, LLE was used prior to CE. This work provides a fast method

757

for the study of the enantioselective metabolism of ketamine (see Figure 6). Moreover, an

758

EKC-UV method was developed for the determination of methorphan and its most

759

important metabolites in post-mortem blood samples from ten subjects who died due to

760

heroin overdose [102]. Dextromethorphan which is the D-form, can be used as anti-cough

761

medications, the L-enantiomer, levomethorphan, is an opiate agonist and unlike the D-

762

enantiomer, it has narcotic activity. Firstly, a LLE was necessary to extract the compounds

763

for the analysis. HP-β-CD was used as chiral selector which allowed baseline

764

enantioseparation of methorphan enantiomers in 20 min.

765

5. Conclusions and future trends

766

The attractive features of CE make this analytical technique one of the best options

767

to carry out a chiral separation. The research works published demonstrate the relevant role

768

of chiral CE in different fields such as the pharmaceutical, food analysis, biomedical, 34

769

environmental or forensic. This fact is possible thanks to the use of different CE modes

770

such as EKC, MEKC or NACE, and a wide variety of commercially available chiral

771

selectors. In the last years, EKC using a single CD or a combination of CDs has been the

772

most popular choice to develop chiral methodologies although other chiral selectors such as

773

maltodextrins, crown ethers or CILs have also been used to a lesser extent. Even though the

774

search of novel chiral selectors has received a significant attention in the last years and a

775

high number of research articles have been published in this area, until now the applications

776

of novel chiral selectors in the enantiomeric analysis of real samples are scarce. New

777

developments mainly related to the use of novel CILs and NPs as chiral selectors will be

778

expected in the near future.

779

UV detection being the most common system in chiral CE is followed by the

780

coupling with other detectors such as LIF or MS. The combination of these two detection

781

systems with preconcentration strategies has enabled the development of the most sensitive

782

chiral methodologies by CE with LODs in the pg/mL and sub-nM level. It is not surprising

783

that the lowest LODs were reached in the bioanalysis field as it is in this case where the

784

highest sensitivity is usually required. Even though CE-MS is a very powerful tool, its

785

application in chiral separations is limited by the incompatibility of nonvolatile chiral

786

selectors with the MS source. The use of the partial filling and countercurrent techniques as

787

well as of volatile selectors enables to increase the applicability of CE-MS to perform a

788

chiral analysis. Future trends should be redirected to the development of MS compatible

789

chiral selectors. In this way and using more versatile and efficient preconcentration

790

strategies, it would be possible to determine a higher number of chiral compounds at trace

791

levels in a big variety of matrices.

35

792

One of the main applications in pharmaceutical analysis has been the determination

793

of the enantiomeric purity of different drugs in pharmaceutical formulations with LODs at

794

the µg/mL level or relative LODs as low as 0.01%. To obtain low relative LODs in

795

pharmaceutical analysis is essential to ensure proper quality control of the enantiomeric

796

impurity to minimize detrimental effects of non-active substances. Bioanalysis is the field

797

in which more researchers have developed CE methods using MS detection. Amino acids

798

and drugs, among other compounds, are the most analyzed ones, being plasma and urine

799

from human or animal models the most analyzed samples. The low LODs achieved by

800

EKC-MS to study the enantioselective metabolism of pheniramine in urine (LOD of 80

801

pg/mL) or by EKC-LIF to determine D-glutamate and D-aspartate in single neurons (LODs

802

in the sub-pM range) can be highlighted. Although biofluids, EBC samples, and even single

803

neurons were analyzed in the last years, the analysis of tissues has not been reported. This

804

could be due to a more difficult sample preparation in the metabolite extraction from

805

tissues. This is something to keep in mind and hopefully future trends will also focus on

806

tissue analysis. This will definitely give insight on the chiral composition of the different

807

organs. Amino and organic acids were the compounds most frequently determined in food

808

samples. The lowest LODs achieved in this case were at the µg/mL and µM level. Several

809

types of water were analyzed in the environmental field to study the chiral separation of

810

different drugs and amino acids. LODs in the nM order were reached using MEKC or EKC

811

with LIF detection. Researchers working in the forensic field mainly focused their work on

812

the study of different drugs in seized samples as well as in human biological samples, being

813

ng/mL the lowest LODs achieved.

36

814

A notable number of research works published in the last years were focused on the

815

combined use of CE with NMR and molecular modeling studies in order to provide a

816

deeper knowledge on the enantioselective noncovalent intermolecular interactions taking

817

place in the chiral recognition mechanism. This is a very interesting area in which the full

818

potential of CE has not been demonstrated yet so new developments are expected in next

819

years.

820

821

Acknowledgements

822

Authors thank financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and

823

Competitiveness (project CTQ2016-76368-P) and the Comunidad of Madrid and European

824

funding from FSE and FEDER programs (project S2018/BAA-4393, AVANSECAL-II-

825

CM). S.B.B and M.C.P. also thank the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness

826

for their predoctoral (BES-2017-082458) and “Ramón y Cajal” (RYC-2013-12688)

827

research contracts, respectively. E.S.L. thanks the University of Alcalá for her postdoctoral

828

contract.

829 830

37

831

References

832

[1] E. Sánchez-López, M. Castro-Puyana, M.L. Marina, Electrophoresis. Capillary

833

Electrophoresis: Chiral separations, in: P. Worsfold, C. Poole, A. Townshend, M. Miró

834

(Eds), Encyclopedia of Analytical Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 3rd edn. vol. 2, 2019, pp.

835

334-345.

836

[2] G. Álvarez, L. Montero, L. Llorens, M. Castro-Puyana, A. Cifuentes, Recent advances

837

in the application of capillary electromigration methods for food analysis and Foodomics,

838

Electrophoresis 39 (2018) 136-159.

839

[3] A.A. Basheer, Chemical chiral pollution: Impact on the society and science and need of

840

the regulations in the 21st century, Chirality, 30 (2018) 402-406.

841

[4] S. El Deeb, H. Watzing, D.A. El-Hady, C. Sanger-van de Griend, G.H.K. Scriba,

842

Recent advances in capillary electrophoretic migration techniques for pharmaceutical

843

analysis (2013-2015), Electrophoresis, 37 (2016) 1591-1608.

844

[5] T.J. Ward, K.D. Ward, Chiral separations: a review of current topics and trends Anal.

845

Chem. 84 (2012) 626-635.

846

[6] R.B. Yu, J.P. Quirino, Chiral selectors in capillary electrophoresis: trends during 2017-

847

2018, Molecules 24 (2019) 1135.

848

[7] S.

849

chromatography and capillary electrochromatography. Electrophoresis 38 (2017) 1822-18-

850

29.

Fanali, An overview to nano-scale analytical techniques: Nano-liquid

38

851

[8] S. Fanali, B. Chankvetadze, Some thoughts about enantioseparations in capillary

852

electrophoresis, Electrophoresis 40 (2019) 2420-2437.

853

[9] B. Chankvetadze,

854

electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr. A. 1567 (2018) 2-25.

855

[10] M. Greño, M.L. Marina, M. Castro-Puyana, Enantioseparation by capillary

856

electrophoresis using ionic liquids as chiral selectors, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 48 (2018)

857

429-446.

858

[11] Q. Zhang, Ionic liquids in capillary electrophoresis for enantioseparation, TrAC-

859

Trends Anal. Chem. 10 (2018) 145-154.

860

[12] I.J. Stavrou, E.A. Agathokleous, C.P. Kapnissi-Christodoulou, Chiral selectors in CE:

861

Recent development and applications (mid-2014 to mid-2016), Electrophoresis 38 (2017)

862

786-819.

863

[13] Z. Aturki, A. Rocco, S. Fanali, Forensic drugs analysis: a review of miniaturized

864

separation techniques, LC-GC Eur. 28 (2015) 18-25.

865

[14] L. Hajba, A. Guttman, Recent advances in column coatings for capillary

866

electrophoresis of proteins, TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 90 (2017) 38-44.

867

[15] Sánchez-López, E.; Castro-Puyana, M.; Marina, M. L.; Crego, A. L. Chiral

868

Separations by Capillary Electrophoresis. In Analytical Separation Science; Anderson, J. L.

869

Berthod, A., Pino Estévez, V., Stalcup, A. M., Eds., 1st edn; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &

870

Co. KGaA: Weinheim, 2015; pp 731-744.

Contemporary theory of enantioseparations in capillary

39

871

[16] A. Salgado, B. Chankvetadze, Applications of nuclear magnetic resonance

872

spectroscopy for the understanding of enantiomer separation mechanisms in capillary

873

electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr A. 1467 (2016) 95-144

874

[17] G.K.E. Scriba, P. Jác, Cyclodextrins as chiral selectors in Capillary Electrophoresis

875

Enantioseparations, in: G.K.E. Scriba (Ed), Chiral Separations: Methods and Protocols,

876

Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1985, Chapter 18, Springer Science+Business Media,

877

New York, 2019, pp. 339-356.

878

[18] M. Greño, M. Castro-Puyana, M. Á. García, M. L. Marina, Analysis of antibiotics by

879

CE and CEC and their use as chiral selectors: An update, Electrophoresis 39 (2019) 235-

880

259.

881

[19] G.K.E. Scriba, Chiral recognition in separation sciences. Part I: Polysaccharide and

882

cyclodextrin selectors, TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 120 (2019) 115639.

883

[20] G.K.E. Scriba, Chiral recognition in separation sciences. Part II: Macrocyclic

884

glycopeptide, donor-acceptor, ion-exchange, ligand-exchange and micellar selectors.

885

TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 119 (2019) 115628.

886

[21] Z.K. Mao, Z.L. Chen, Advances in capillary electro-chromatography, J. Pharm. Anal.

887

9 (2019) 227-237

888

[22] I. Ali, M.M. Sanagi, H.Y. Aboul-Enein, Advances in chiral separations by nonaqueous

889

capillary electrophoresis in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, Electrophoresis 35

890

(2014) 926-936.

891

[23] C. Sonnendecke, S. Thurmann, C. Przybylski, F.D. Zitzmann, FD, N. Heinke, Y.

892

Krauke, K. Monks, A.A. Robitzki, D. Belder, W. Zimmermann, Large-ring cyclodextrins 40

893

as chiral selectors for enantiomeric pharmaceuticals, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 58 (2019)

894

6411-6414.

895

[24] S.A. Rizvi, S.A. Shamsi, Synthesis, characterization, and application of chiral ionic

896

liquids and their polymers in micellar electrokinetic chromatography, Anal. Chem. 78

897

(2006) 7061-7069.

898

[25] L.M. Yuan, Y. Zhou, X. Meng, Z.Y. Li, M. Zi, Y.X. Chang, (R)-N,N,N-Trimethyl-2-

899

Aminobutanol-Bis(Trifluoromethane-Sulfon)Imidate chiral ionic liquid used as chiral

900

selector in HPCE, HPLC and CGC. Anal. Lett. 39 (2006) 1439-1449.

901

[26] M. Greño, M.L. Marina, M. Castro-Puyana, Effect of the combined use of g-

902

cyclodextrin and a chiral ionic liquid on the enantiomeric separation of homocysteine by

903

capillary electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr. A 1568 (2018) 222-228.

904

[27] Q. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Xue, M. Rui, B. Gao, A. Li, J. Bai, Z. Yin, E.M.

905

Anochie,Enhanced enantioselectivity of native α-cyclodextrins by the synergy of

906

chiralionic liquids in capillary electrophoresis, J. Sep. Sci. 41 (2018) 4525-4532.

907

[28] J. Wahl, U. Holzgrabe, Capillary electrophoresis separation of phenethylamine

908

enantiomers using amino acid based ionic liquids, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 148 (2018)

909

245-250.

910

[29] S. Salido-Fortuna, M. Greño, M. Castro-Puyana, M. L. Marina, Amino acid chiral

911

ionic liquids combined with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin for drug enantioseparation by

912

capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. A 1607 (2019) 460375.

41

913

[30] N. Casado, A. Salgado, M. Castro-Puyana, M.A. García, M.L. Marina, Enantiomeric

914

separation of ivabradine by cyclodextrin-electrokinetic chromatography. Effect of amino

915

acid chiral ionic liquids. J. Chromatogr. A 1608 (2019) 460407.

916

[31] A. Hussain, M.F. Aljam, I. Hussain, I. Ali, Future of ionic liquids for chiral

917

separations in high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis, Crit.

918

Rev. Anal. Chem. 49 (2019) 289-305.

919

[32] S. Dixit, J.H. Park, Application of rifampicin as a chiral selector for enantioresolution

920

of basic drugs using capillary electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr. A 1453 (2016) 138-142.

921

[33] M.G. Jang, M.D. Jang, J.H. Park, Doxyciline as a new chiral selector in capillary

922

electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr. A 1508 (2017) 176-181

923

[34] Y. Tao, Y Du, J, Chen, G. Xu, K. Zhang, Q. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Du, Z, Feng, Y.

924

Zhang, Study on clarithromycin lactobionate based dual selector systems for the

925

enantioseparation of basic drugs in capillary electrophoresis, J. Sep. Sci. 38 (2015) 2900-

926

2906.

927

[35] S. Dixit, J.H, Park, Enantioseparation of basic chiral drugs on a carbamoylated

928

erythromycin-zirconia

929

Chromatogr. A 1416 (2015) 129-136.

930

[36] J. Liu, Y.X. Du, X.D. Sun, Z.J. Feng, X.F. Ma, J.T. Li, Synthesis and application of

931

amino triazolium-modified lactobionic acid as chiral selector in capillary electrophoresis, J.

932

Chromatogr. A 1594 (2019) 199-207.

hybrid

monolith

using

42

capillary

electrochromatography J.

933

[37] X. Yang, Z. Yang, T. Yu, Y.X. Du, J.Q. Chen, Z.R. Liu, Y. Xi, Study of the

934

enantioselectivity and recognition mechanism of chiral dual system based on chondroitin

935

sulfate D in capillary electrophoresis, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 410 (2018) 5889-5898.

936

[38] M.A. González-Curbelo, D.A.Varela-Martínez, B. Socas-Rodríguez, J.Hernández-

937

Borges, Recent applications of nanomaterials in capillary electrophoresis, Electrophoresis

938

38 (2017) 2431-2446.

939

[39] X. Sun, J. Guo, T. Yu, Y. Du, Z. Feng, S. Zhao, Z. Huang, J. Liu, A novel coating

940

method for CE capillary using carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin-modified magnetic

941

microparticles as stationary for electrochromatography enantioseparation, Anal. Bioanal.

942

Chem. 41 (2019) 1193-1202.

943

[40] C.Y. Liu, J.S. Zhang, X.J. Zhang, L.Z. Zhao, S. Li, Enantiomeric separation of

944

adrenaline, noradrenaline, and isoprenaline by capillary electrophoresis using streptomycin-

945

modified gold nanoparticles, Microchim. Acta 185 (2018) 227.

946

[41] A.V. Patel, T. Kawai, L. Wang, S.S. Rubakhin, J. V. Sweedler, Chiral measurement of

947

aspartate and glutamate in single neurons by large-volume sample stacking capillary

948

electrophoresis, Anal. Chem. 89 (2017) 12375-12382.

949

[42] J.S. Creamer, M.F. Mora, P.A. Willis, Enhanced resolution of chiral amino acids with

950

capillary electrophoresis for biosignature detection in extraterrestrial samples, Anal. Chem.

951

89 (2017) 1329-1337.

952

[43] Y. Jiang, M-Y. He, W-J. Zhang, P. Luo, D. Guo, X. Fang, W. Xu, Recent advances of

953

capillary electrophoresismass spectrometry instrumentation and methodology, Chin. Chem.

954

Lett. 28 (2017) 1640-1652. 43

955

[44] Y. Liu, S. A. Shamsi, Chiral capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry:

956

developments and applications in the period 2010-2015: A Review. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 54

957

(2016) 1771-1786.

958

[45] X. Cui, C. Liang, F. Gong, R. Wang, C. Ni, Y. Wu, G. Chen, Y. Zhang, Simultaneous

959

chiral analysis of amphetamine‐type stimulants and ephedrine by capillary electrophoresis

960

coupled to time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry, Chirality 30 (2018) 1079-1087.

961

[46] M. Liu, H. Zhao, Z. Zhang, X. Li, L. Mao, R. Zhang, Y. Wang, Derivatization reagent-

962

assisted enantioseparation of 3-hydroxyaspartate with two chiral centers in rat cerebrospinal

963

fluid by capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry, Anal. Chim. Acta 1047 (2019) 257-

964

266.

965

[47] R.C. Moldovan, E. Bodoki, T. Kacsó, A.C. Servais, J. Crommen, R. Oprean, M. Fillet,

966

A micellar electrokinetic chromatography–mass spectrometry approach using in-capillary

967

diastereomeric derivatization for fully automatized chiral analysis of amino acids, J.

968

Chromatogr. A 1467 (2016) 400-408.

969

[48] A. Prior, R.C. Moldovan, J. Crommen, A.C. Servais, M Fillet, G. J. de Jong, G. W.

970

Somsen, Enantioselective capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry of amino acids in

971

cerebrospinal fluid using a chiral derivatizing agent and volatile surfactant, Anal. Chim.

972

Acta 940 (2016) 150-158.

973

[49] Y. Liu, M. Jann, C. Vandenberg, C.B. Eap, S.A. Shamsi, Development of an

974

enantioselective

975

desmethylvenlafaxine

assay

for by

simultaneous micellar

separation

electrokinetic

44

of

venlafaxine

and

chromatography-tandem

Omass

976

spectrometry: Application to the analysis of drug–drug interaction, J. Chromatogr. A, 1420

977

(2015) 119-128.

978

[50] S. Lee, S.J. Kim, E. Bang, Y.C. Na, Chiral separation of intact amino acids by

979

capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry employing a partial filling technique with a

980

crown ether carboxylic acid, J. Chromatogr. A 1586 (2019) 128-138.

981

[51] J. Piestansky, K. Marakova, M. Koval, E. Havranek, P. Mikus, Enantioselective

982

column coupled electrophoresis employing large bore capillaries hyphenated with tandem

983

mass spectrometry for ultra-trace determination of chiral compounds in complex real

984

samples, Electrophoresis 36 (2015) 3069-3079.

985

[52] J.L. Guo, J.C. Wang, H. Lin, Y. Feng, H.Q. Shen, R.S. Huang, L. Liu, Z.X. Zhao,

986

Combination of capillary electrophoresis and molecular modeling to study the enantiomer

987

affinity pattern between beta-blockers and anionic cyclodextrin derivatives in a methanolic

988

and water background electrolyte, J. Sep. Sci 42 (2019) 1077-1087.

989

[53] M. Michalska, W. Bocian, E. Bednarek, B. Palys, J. Cielecka-Piontek,

990

Enantioselective recognition of sutezolid by cyclodextrin modified non-aqueous capillary

991

electrophoresis and explanation of complex formation by means of infrared spectroscopy,

992

NMR and molecular modelling, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 169 (2019) 49-59.

993

[54] S. Flor, M. Juan Huala, V. Tripodi, S. Lucangioli, Development of an enantioselective

994

capillary electrophoretic method for the simultaneous determination of montelukast

995

enantiomeric

996

Electrophoresis 37 (2016) 2420-2428.

and

diastereoisomeric

forms

45

and

its

main

degradation

product,

997

[55] A. Sarkany, G. Hancu,A. Carje, C. Dragut, L.A. Papp, Chiral separation of tramadol

998

enantiomers by capillary electrophoresis using cyclodextrins as chiral selectors and

999

experimental design method optimization, Chem. Pap. 64 (2010) 278-284.

1000

[56] S. Krait, M. Dousa, G.K.E. Scriba, Quality by Design-guided development of a

1001

capillary electrophoresis method for the chiral purity determination of ambrisentan,

1002

Chromatographia 79, (2016) 1343-1350]

1003

[57] S. Niedermeier, G.K.E. Scriba, A quality by design-based approach to a capillary

1004

electrokinetic assay for the determination of dextromepromazine and levomepromazine

1005

sulfoxide as impurities of levomepromazine, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 146 (2017) 402-409.

1006

[58] S. Krait, M. Heuermann, G.K.E. Scriba, Development of a capillary electrophoresis

1007

method for the determination of the chiral purity of dextromethorphan by a dual selector

1008

system using quality by design methodology, J. Sep. Sci. 41 (2018) 1405-1413.

1009

[59] H. Harnisch, G.K.E. Scriba, Capillary electrophoresis method for the determination of

1010

(R)-dapoxetine,

1011

propanol and 1-naphthol as impurities of dapoxetine hydrochloride, J. Pharm. Biomed.

1012

Anal. 162 (2019) 257-263.

1013

[60] S. Orlandini, B. Pasquini, M. Del Bubba, S. Pinzauti, S. Furlanetto, Quality by design

1014

in the chiral separation strategy for the determination of enantiomeric impurities:

1015

development of a capillary electrophoresis method based on dual cyclodextrin systems for

1016

the analysis of levosulpiride, J. Chromatogr. A 1380 (2015) 177-185

(3S)-3-(dimethylamino)-3-phenyl-1-propanol,(S)-3-amino-3-phenyl-1-

46

1017

[61] K.R. Lee, N.T. Nguyen, Y.J. Lee, S. Choi, J.S. Kang, W. Mar, K.H. Kim,

1018

Determination of the R-enantiomer of valsartan in pharmaceutical formulation by capillary

1019

electrophoresis, Arch. Pharm. Res. 38 (2018) 826-833.

1020

[62] P. Ginterova, J. Znaleziona, R. Knob, M. Dousa, J. Petr, J. Sevcik, Enantiomeric purity

1021

control of R-cinacalcet in pharmaceutical product by capillary electrophoresis, Chem. Pap.

1022

70 (2016) 1024-1030.

1023

[63] N. Menéndez-López, J. Valimaña-Traverso, M. Castro-Puyana, A. Salgado, M.Á.

1024

García, M.L. Marina, Enantiomeric separation of the antiuremic drug colchicine by

1025

electrokinetic chromatography. Method development and quantitative analysis, J. Pharm.

1026

Biomed. Anal. 138 (2017) 189-196.

1027

[64] Z.I. Szabó, R. Ludmerczki, B. Fiser, B. Noszál, G. Tóth, Chiral separation of

1028

rasagiline using sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin: capillary electrophoresis, NMR and

1029

molecular modeling study, Electrophoresis 40 (2019) 1897-1903.

1030

[65] O. Wahl, U. Holzgrabe, Evaluation of enantiomeric purity of magnesium-L-aspartate

1031

dihydrate, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 102 (2015) 100-109.

1032

[66] G. Hancu, M. Budău, L.K. Kántor, A. Cârje, Cyclodextrine screening for the chiral

1033

separation of amlodipine enantiomers by capillary electrophoresis, Adv. Pharm. Bull. 5

1034

(2015) 35-40.

1035

[67] G. Hancu, A. Cârje, LL. Iuga, I. Fülöp, Z.-I. Szabóa, Cyclodextrine screening for the

1036

chiral separation of carvedilol by capillary electrophoresis, Iran J. Pharm. Res. 14 (2015)

1037

425-433.

47

1038

[68] L.P. Lourenco, F.A. Aguiar, A.R.M. de Oliveira, C.M. Gaitani, Quantitative

1039

determination of lercanidipine enantiomers in commercial formulations by capillary

1040

electrophoresis, J. Anal. Methods Chem. (2015) 294270.

1041

[69] L. Kanizsová, M. Ansorge, I. Zusková, P. Dubský, Using single-isomer octa(6-O-

1042

sulfo)-β-cyclodextrin for fast capillary zone electrophoretic enantioseparation of pindolol:

1043

Determination of complexation constants, software-assisted optimization, and method

1044

validation, J. Chromatogr. A 21 (2018) 214-221.

1045

[70] Z.I. Szabó, R. Gál, L. Szőcs, R. Ludmerczki, D.L. Muntean, B. Noszál, G. Tóth,

1046

Validated capillary electrophoretic method for the enantiomeric quality control of R-

1047

praziquantel, Electrophoresis 38 (2017) 1886-1894.

1048

[71] E. Nagdhdi, A.R. Fakhari, Simultaneous chiral separation of tramadol and methadone

1049

in tablets, human urine, and plasma by capillary electrophoresis using maltodextrin as the

1050

chiral selector, Chirality 30 (2018) 1161-1168.

1051

[72] H. Xiao, X. Fu, S. Liang, Y. Li, J.J. Bao, Y. Zhang, An approach to the determination

1052

of the enantiomeric excess at the extreme case by capillary electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr.

1053

A 1408 (2015) 205-254.

1054

[73] X. Li, Y. Du, Z. Feng, X. Sun, Z. Huang, A novel enantioseparation approach based

1055

on liposome electrokinetic capillary chromatography, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 145 (2017)

1056

186-194.

1057

[74] N. An, L. Wang, J. Zhao, L. Lv, N. Wanga, H. Guo, Enantioseparation of fourteen

1058

amino alcohols by nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis using lactobionic acid/D-(+)-xylos

1059

e–boric acid complexes as chiral selectors, Anal. Methods 8 (2016) 1127-1134. 48

1060

[75] L. Lv, L. Wang, J. Li, Y. Jiao, S. Gao, J. Wang, H. Yan, Enantiomeric separation of

1061

seven β-agonists by NACE-Study of chiral selectivity with diacetone-d-mannitol-boric acid

1062

complex, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 145 (2017) 399-405.

1063

[76] ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Impurities in New Drug Products Q3B(R2)

1064

(2006) International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for

1065

registration

1066

https://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q3B_R

1067

2/Step4/Q3B_R2__Guideline.pdf Accessed Aug 2019.

1068

[77] S. Hamidi, M. Khoubnasabjafari, K. Ansarin, V. Jouyban-Gharamaleki, A. Jouyban,

1069

Chiral separation of methadone in exhaled breath condensate using capillary

1070

electrophoresis, Anal. Methods 9 (2017) 2342-2350.

1071

[78] A.B. Martínez-Girón, M.L. Marina, A.L. Crego, Chiral separation of a basic drug with

1072

two chiral centers by electrokinetic chromatography for its pharmaceutical development, J.

1073

Chromatogr. A 1467 (2016) 427-435.

1074

[79] F.A. Sandbaumhüter, R. Theurillat, R.N. Bektas, A.P.N. Kutter, R. Bettschart-

1075

Wolfensberger, W. Thormann, Pharmacokinetics of ketamine and three metabolites in

1076

Beagle

1077

enantioselective capillary electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr. A 1467 (2016) 436-444.

1078

[80] Y. Yao, B. Zhang, S. Li, J. Yu, X. Guo, Enantioselective analysis of pheniramine in rat

1079

using large volume sample stacking or cation-selective exhaustive injection and sweeping

1080

coupled with cyclodextrin modified electrokinetic chromatography, Talanta 192 (2019)

1081

226-232.

dogs

of

under

pharmaceuticals

sevoflurane

vs.

for

medetomidine

49

human

comedication

use.

assessed

by

1082

[81] A. Prior, L. Sánchez-Hernández, J. Sastre-Toraño, M.L. Marina, G.J. de Jong, G.W.

1083

Somsen, Enantioselective analysis of proteinogenic amino acids in cerebrospinal fluid by

1084

capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry, Electrophoresis 37 (2016) 2410-2419.

1085

[82] E. Sánchez-López, A. Marcos, E. Ambrosio. M.L. Marina, A.L. Crego,

1086

Enantioseparation of the constituents involved in the phenylalanine-tyrosine metabolic

1087

pathway by capillary electrophoresis tandem mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A 1467

1088

(2016) 372-382.

1089

[83] M. Svidrnoch, A. Pribylka, V. Bekarek, J. Sevcik, V. Smolka, V. Maier,

1090

Enantioseparation of D,L-2-hydroxyglutaric acid by capillary electrophoresis with tandem

1091

mass spectrometry. Fast and efficient tool for D- and L-2-hydroxyglutaracidurias diagnosis,

1092

J. Chromatogr. A 1467 (2016) 383-390.

1093

[84] R. Pérez-Míguez, M.L. Marina, M. Castro-Puyana, Enantiomeric separation of non-

1094

protein amino acids by electrokinetic chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1467 (2016) 409-

1095

416.

1096

[85] A. Pribylka, M. Svidrnoch, J. Sevcık, V. Maier, Enantiomeric separation of 1,3-

1097

dimethylamylamine by capillary electrophoresis with indirect UV detection using a dual-

1098

selector system. Electrophoresis 36 (2015) 2866-2873.

1099

[86] B. Pasquini, S. Orlandini, M. Goodarzi, C. Caprini, R. Gotti, S. Furlanetto, Chiral

1100

cyclodextrin-modified micellar electrokinetic chromatography and chemometric techniques

1101

for green tea samples origin discrimination, Talanta 150 (2016) 7-13.

1102

[87] J. Fiori, B. Pasquini, C. Caprini, S. Orlandini, S. Furlanetto, R. Gotti, Chiral analysis

1103

of theanine and catechin in characterization of greentea by cyclodextrin-modified micellar 50

1104

electrokinetic

chromatographyand

high

performance

1105

Chromatogr. A 1562 (2018) 115-122.

1106

[88] Y.N. Miao, Q. Liu, W. Wang, L. Liu, L. Wang, Enantioseparation of amino acids by

1107

micellar capillary electrophoresis using binary chiral selectors and determination of D-

1108

glutamic acid and D-aspartic acid in rice wine, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 40

1109

(2017) 783-789.

1110

[89] S. Kodama, S. Nakajima, H. Ozaki, R. Takemoto, Y. Itabashi, A. Kuksis,

1111

Enantioseparation of hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids by hydroxypropyl-γ-cyclodextrin

1112

modified micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Electrophoresis 37 (2016) 23-24.

1113

[90] C. Aydogan, V. Karakoc, A. Denizli, Chiral ligand-exchange separation and

1114

determination of malic acid enantiomers in apple juice by open-tubular capillary

1115

electrochromatography. Food Chem. 187 (2015) 130-134

1116

[91] M. Kamencev, N. Komarova, O. Morozova, Enantioseparation of tartaric and malic

1117

acids in wines by Ligand Exchange Capillary Electrophoresis using uncoated fused silica

1118

capillary. Chromatographia 79 (2016) 927-93.

1119

[92] S. Yamamoto, Y. Tamata, K. Sejima, M. Kinoshita, S. Suzuki, Chiral separation of

1120

D/L-aldoses by micellar electrokinetic chromatography using a chiral derivatization reagent

1121

and a phenylboronic acid complex. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 407 (2015) 6201-6206.

1122

[93] R. Pérez-Míguez, M.L. Marina, M Castro-Puyana, A micellar electrokinetic

1123

chromatography approach using diastereomeric derivatization and a volatile surfactant for

1124

the enantioselective separation of selenomethionine, Electrophoresis 40 (2019) 1951-1958.

51

liquid

chromatography,

J.

1125

[94] J. Valimaña-Traverso, S. Morante-Zarcero, D. Pérez-Quintanilla, M.A. García, I.

1126

Sierra, M.L. Marina, Periodic mesoporous organosilica materials as sorbents for solid-

1127

phase extraction of drugs prior to simultaneous enantiomericseparation by capillary

1128

electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr. A 1566 (2018) 135-145.

1129

[95] J. Valimaña-Traverso, S. Morante-Zarcero, D. Pérez-Quintanilla, M.A. García, I.

1130

Sierra, M.L. Marina, Cationic amine-bridged periodic mesoporous organosilica materialsfor

1131

off-line solid-phase extraction of phenoxy acid herbicides from water samples prior to their

1132

simultaneous enantiomericdetermination by capillary electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr. A

1133

1566 (2018) 146-157.

1134

[96] J. Valimaña-Traverso, G. Amarieri, K. Boltes, M.A. García, I. Sierra, M.L. Marina,

1135

Enantiomer stability and combined toxicity of duloxetine and econazole on Daphnia magna

1136

using real concentrations determined by capillary electrophoresis, Sci. Total Environ. 670

1137

(2019) 770-778.

1138

[97] M. Silva, S. Morante-Zarcero, D. Pérez-Quintanilla, M.L. Marina, I. Sierra,

1139

Preconcentration of β -blockers using functionalized ordered mesoporous silica as sorbent

1140

for SPE and their determination in waters by chiral CE, Electrophoresis 38 (2017) 1905-

1141

1912.

1142

[98] M. Silva, S. Morante-Zarcero, D. Pérez-Quintanilla, M. L. Marina, I. Sierra,

1143

Environmental chiral analysis of β-blockers: evaluation of different n-alkyl-modified SBA-

1144

15 mesoporous silicas as sorbents in solid-phase extraction, Environ. Chem. 15 (2018) 362-

1145

371.

52

1146

[99] T. Mikuma, Y.T. Iwata, H. Miyaguchi, K. Kuwayama, K. Tsujikawa, T. Kanamori, H.

1147

Inouse, The use of a sulfonated capillary on chiral capillary electrophoresis/mass

1148

spectrometry of amphetamine-type stimulants for methamphetamine impurity profiling,

1149

Forensic Sci. Int. 249 (2015) 59-65.

1150

[100] L. Li, I.S. Lurie, Regioisomeric and enantiomeric analyses of 24 designer cathinones

1151

and phenethylamines using ultra high performance liquid chromatography and capillary

1152

electrophoresis with added cyclodextrins, Forensic Sci. Int. 254 (2015) 148-157.

1153

[101] N. Porpiglia, G. Musile, F. Bortolotti, E.F. De Palo, F. Tagliaro, Chiral separation

1154

and determination of ketamine and norketamine in hair by capillary electrophoresis,

1155

Forensic Sci. Int. 266 (2016) 304-310.

1156

[102] A. Bertaso, G. Musile, R. Gottardo, C. Seri, F. Tagliaro, Chiral analysis of

1157

methorphan in opiate-overdose related deaths by using capillary electrophoresis, J

1158

Chromatogr. B 1000 (2015) 130-135.

1159

1160

1161

53

1162

Figure Captions

1163 1164

Figure 1. Percentage of the number of research papers published from 2015 to 2019

1165

dealing with chiral analysis using different separation techniques obtained from Web of

1166

Science Thomson Reuters database (Accessed August 2019). The keywords employed were

1167

“chiral analysis” and “liquid chromatography”, “capillary electrophoresis”, “gas

1168

chromatography”, or “supercritical fluid chromatography”.

1169

Figure 2. Electropherogram corresponding to enantiomeric excess measurement of

1170

levamlodipine besylate tablets (4.312 mg/mL) obtained using 3.0 % (w/v) α-CD as chiral

1171

selector in velocity gap mode of CE. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [72].

1172

Figure 3. Comparison of EKC-LIF and LVSS-EKC-LIF in the analysis of D,L-aspartate

1173

(Asp) and D,L-glutamate (Glu). CE conditions: 110 mg/mL QA-β-CD in 60 mM 2-(N-

1174

morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (pH 6.0) plus 10 mM KBr; applied voltage, -26 kV;

1175

temperature, 18°C; LVSS injection, 20 psi × 1 min; detection, emission wavelength at 440

1176

± 8 nm. Peaks in the electropherograms: (1) L-Asp, (2) D-Asp, (3) D-Glu, and (4) L-Glu.

1177

Adapted with permission from Ref. [41].

1178

Figure 4. Electropherograms corresponding to the chiral analysis of malic acid by OT-

1179

CEC. (A) Enantiomeric mixture of malic acid, (B, C, and D) the standard solution from

1180

apple juice diluted 10, 20 and 40-fold, respectively. CEC conditions: ACN/5.0 mM CuSO4,

1181

20.0 mM (NH4)2SO4 (60/40%); applied voltage, 20 kV; injection: -12 kV during 0.05 min;

1182

detection, 214 nm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [90]

1183

Figure 5. Analysis of duloxetine and econazole racemates (both at a racemic concentration

1184

of 20 mg/L) in (A) an aqueous standard solution; (B) culture medium at zero time; (C) 54

1185

culture medium at 72 h incubation (abiotic conditions); (D) culture medium in presence of

1186

Daphnia magna at 72 h incubation. EKC conditions: 1.5% S-β-CD in 25 mM phosphate

1187

buffer (pH 3.0); applied voltage, -20 kV; temperature, 30°C; injection, 50 mbar × 10 s,

1188

detection, 210 nm. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [96].

1189

Figure 6. Analysis of ketamine and norketamine in three different hair sample from

1190

ketamine abusers. EKC conditions: 0.1% S-γ-CD in 15 mM Tris phosphate (pH 2.5);

1191

applied voltage, 20 kV; temperature, 20°C; injection, 7 kV × 20 s, detection, 200 nm.

1192

Reproduced with permission from Ref. [101].

55

Table 1. Some of the most representative and recent review articles on general aspects of enantiomeric separations by CE. Year

Title

Ref.

2019

Some thoughts about enantioseparations in capillary electrophoresis

[8]

2019

Chiral selectors in capillary electrophoresis: trends during 2017–2018

[6]

2018

Contemporary theory of enantioseparations in capillary electrophoresis

[9]

2018 2018 2017

Enantioseparation by capillary electrophoresis using ionic liquids as chiral selectors Ionic liquids in capillary electrophoresis for enantioseparation Chiral selectors in CE: recent development and applications (mid-2014 to mid2016)

[10] [11] [12]

]Table 2. Characteristics of the most representative CE methodologies developed for pharmaceutical analysis. Analyte

Sample

Montelukast enantiomeric and diastereoisomeric forms

Bulk product, chewable tablets and oral granules (pouches)

Tramadol

Pharmaceutical formulations (capsules and tablets)

CE modedetection

MEKC-UV

EKC-UV

BGE

LOD

Application

Ref.

CS: 10 mM SBE-β-CD +10 mM TM-β-CD B: 10 mM SDS + 20 mM borate (pH 9.0)

0.30 µg/mL (RLOD 0.02%)

Determination of montelukast enantiomeric and diastereoisomeric forms and its main degradation product in bulk product, chewable tablets and oral granules

[54]

CS: 5 mM CM-β-CD B:25 mM Borate pH (11.0)

0.02 mg/mL ((S,S)tramado) 0.024 mg/mL ((R,R)tramadol)

Enantioseparation of two tramadol enantiomers

[55]

Ambrisentan

A chemical supplier sample

EKC-UV

CS: 30 mM γ-CD B: 50 mM acetate (pH 4.0)

0.2 µg/mL

Levomepromazine

Injection solution and a reference substance of the European Pharmacopoeia

EKC-UV

CS: 3.6 mg/mL HP-γ-CD B: 100 mM citric acid (pH 2.85)

0.03% (dextromepromazine)

Dextromethorphan

Capsules

EKC-UV

Dapoxetine

Tablets

EKC-UV

CS: 20 mg/mL S-β-CD + 10 mg/mL M-α-CD B: 50 mM phosphate (pH 7.0)

0.3 µg/mL (0.02%) (levomethorphan)

CS: 45 mg/mL S-γ-CD and

0.66 µg/mL ((R)-

Evaluation of the enantiomeric purity of (S)-ambrisentan in a chemical supplier sample Determination of dextromepromazine and the oxidation product levomepromazine sulfoxide in levomepromazine Determination of the enantiomeric purity of dextromethorphan in capsules Determination of the

[56]

[57]

[58] [59]

40.2 mg/mL DM-β-CD (50%) B: 50 mM phosphate (pH 6.3) CS: 10 mM S-β-CD + 34 mM M-β-CD B: 5 mM Britton Robinson (pH 3.45)

dapoxetine) 1.2 µg/mL for enantiomeric impurity (R-levosulpiride)

Levosulpiride

Pharmaceutical formulations

EKC-UV

Valsartan

Tablets

EKC-UV

CS: 10 mM A-β-CD B: 25 mM phosphate (pH 8)

0.01% (R-valsartan)

Cinacalcet

Tablets

EKC-UV

CS: 0.5% (w/v) HP-γ-CD B: 150 mM phosphate (pH 2.5) + 20% (v/v) of methanol

0.1% ((S)-cinacalcet)

Colchicine

Pharmaceutical formulations

EKC-UV

CS: 7 mM Succ-γ-CD B: 50 mM borate (pH 9.0)

0.3 mg/L ((R)colchicine)

Rasagiline

Tablets

EKC-UV

2 µg/mL ((S)rasagiline)

Mn-L-Asp

Batch samples and drug products

EKC-LIF

CS: 30 mM SBE-β-CD B: 50 mM glycine-HCl (pH 2) CS: 18 mM HP-β-CD B: 50 mM phosphate (pH 7.0) + 18% (v/v) DMSO

Amlodipine

Tablets

EKC-UV

CS: 20 mM M-β-CD B: 50 mM phosphate (pH 3.0)

Carvedilol

Tablets

EKC-UV

CS: 10 mM β-CD B: 25 mM phosphate (pH 2.5)

Lercanidipine

Tablets

EKC-UV

CS: 10 mM of TM-β-CD B: 200 mM acetate (pH 4.0)

LOQ: 0.03 % (Mn-DAsp) 2.31 µg/mL ((R)amlodipine) 2.43 µg/mL ((S)amlodipine) 1.13 µg/mL ((R)carvedilol) 1.18 µg/mL ((S)carvedilol) 0.8 µg/mL ((S)lercanidipine)

purity of dapoxetine in tablets Quantification of levosulpiride in pharmaceutical formulations Determination of the (R)-enantiomer of valsartan in tablets Quantification of cinacalcet in tablets Quantification of colchicine in pharmaceutical formulations Determination of (S)rasagiline in tablets Quantification of Mn-LAsp in batch samples and drug products

[60]

[61]

[62]

[63]

[64] [65]

Determination of amlodipine enantiomers in tablets

[66]

Quantification of carvedilol in tablets

[67]

Quantification of lercanidipine in tablets

[68]

Pindolol

Pills

EKC-UV

CS: 6 mM OS-γ-CD B: 40/80 mM Sodium/MOPS pH (7.12)

Praziquantel

Tablets

EKC-UV

CS: 15 mM S-β-CD B: 50 mM phosphate (pH 2.0)

Tramadol and methadone

Tablets

EKC-UV

Levamlodipine besylate

Tablets

EKC-UV

Naproxene

Bulk sample

LEKC-UV

Propranolol

Tablets

NACE-UV

Clenbuterol

Oral solution

NACE-UV

0.6 µg/mL ((R)lercanidipine) 0.6 µg/mL ((R)pindolol) 0.6 µg/mL ((S)pindolol)

Enantioseparation of pindolol enantiomers in pills

[69]

0.75 µg/mL

Separation of the Praziquantel enantiomers in tablets

[70]

CS: 20% (w/v) Maltodextrin (DE=4-7) B: 100mM phosphate (pH 8.0)

2 µg/mL (tramadol) 1.5 µg/mL (methadone)

Determination of tramadol and methadone in different samples

[71]

CS: 3.0% (w/v) α-CD B: not stated

1 % ((R)levamlodipine)

Quantification of levamlodipine besylate in tablets

[72]

4.5 µg/mL

Enantioseparation of Naproxene in bulk sample

[73]

0.25 µg/mL (((R)propranolol) 0.50 µg/mL ((S)propranolol)

Quantification of propranolol in tablets

[74]

0.25 µg/mL

Separation of clenbuterol agonists in oral solution

[75]

CS: 2% SBE-β-CD (w/v) + 1.2% (w/v) nanoliposome B: 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 5.2) CS: 8 mM lactobionic acid, 100 mM boric acid B: 14.4 mM triethylamine in methanol CS:80 mM diacetone-Dmannitol B: 100 mM boric acid + 50.4 mM triethylamine in methanol

Abbreviations: A-β-CD, acetyl-β-CD; B, buffer; CM-β-CD, carboxymethyl-β-CD; CS, chiral selector; DE, dextrose equivalent; DM-β-CD, 2,6-dimethyl-βCD; HP-γ-CD, 2-hydroxypropyl-γ- CD; γ-CD,γ -CD; M-α-CD, methyl-α-CD; M-β-CD, methyl-β- CD; MOPS, 3-(N-morpholino) propanesulphonic acid;

OS-γ-CD, octa (6-O-sulfo) γ- CD; Succ-γ-CD, succinyl-γ- CD; S-β-CD: sulfated β- CD; S-γ-CD, sulfated γ- CD; SBE-β-CD, sulfobutyl ether-β-CD; TM-βCD, 2,3,6-tri-O-methyl-β-CD; SDS, sodium dodecyl sulphate.

Table 3. Characteristics of the most representative methodologies developed by CE for bioanalysis. Analyte

Sample

CE modedetection

BGE

LOD

Methadone

EBC

EKC-UV

CS: (0.8%) CM-β-CD B: 100 mM phosphoric acidTEA (pH 2.5)

LLOQ: 0.15 µg/mL

API derived from pyroglutamic acid

Rat plasma

EKC-UV

CS: 2.5% (w/v) S-β-CD B: 50 mM phosphate (pH 2.5)

0.15-0.17 µg/mL

CS: 0.66 % (w/v) S-γ-CD B: disodium hydrogenphosphate buffer (pH 3.0)

3 ng/mL

Ketamine and metabolites

Dog plasma

EKC/UV

Pheniramine

Rat plasma

EKC/UV

Pheniramine and metabolites

Human urine

EKC/MS

3-hydroxyaspartate

Rat CSF

EKC/MS

CS: 6 mM β-CD B: 49 mM NH4Ac + 15% (v/v) isopropanol

87 nM

Proteinogenic amino acids

Human CSF

EKC/MS

CS: 10 mM β-CD B: 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 8) + 15%

0.5-84.3 µM

CS: 30 mg/mL S-β-CD B: 30 mM phosphate buffer (pH 3.0) CS: 5 mg/mL CM-β-CD B: 25 mM ε-aminocaproic acid + 25 mM acetic acid (pH 4.5) + 0.05 % (w/v) methylhydroxyethylcellulose

LLOQ: 10 ng/mL

80 pg/mL

Application Quantification of methadone enantiomers in EBC Study on drug enantiomeric inversion in vivo Determination of ketamine and metabolites in dog plasma under sevoflurane or medetomidine and ketamine intake Pharmacokinetic study on rats treated with racemic pheniramine Determination of pheniramine and its metabolites in urine of healthy patients after pheniramine intake Simultaneous determination of four isomers of 3hydroxyaspartate in rat CSF Enantioselective analysis of proteinogenic amino

Ref. [77]

[78]

[79]

[80]

[51]

[46]

[81]

Phenylalanine, tyrosine, DOPA, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine

2-hydroxyglutaric acid

Rat plasma

Human urine

EKC-MS/MS

(v/v) isopropanol

acids in CSF

CS: 180 mM M-β-CD + 40 mM HP-β-CD B: 2 M formic acid (pH 1.2)

Chiral separation of the constituents of the PheTyr metabolic pathway in rat plasma

40-150 nM

EKC/MS

CS: 25 mM vancomycin B: 50 mM ammonium acetate (pH 4.5)

31-38 nM

10.5-15 ng/mL 15 ng/mL

Sub-pM

Venlafaxine and metabolites

Human plasma

MEKC/MS

CS: 15 mM poly-L,L-SULA B: 20 mM ammonium acetate + 25 mM TEA (pH 8.5)

Aspartate and glutamate

Single neurons from Aplysia californica

EKC/LIF

CS: 110 mg/mL QA-β-CD B:60 mM MES (pH 6.0) + 10 mM KBr

Determination of 2hydroxyglutaric acid in urine of healthy patients and children with abnormal excretion of 2hydroxyglutaric acid Determination of venlafaxine and metabolites in plasma of healthy patients after venlafaxine intake with or without indinavir Study on excitatory amino acids in neurons isolated from different neurological clusters of sea slug

[82]

[83]

[49]

[41]

Abbreviations: API, active pharmaceutical ingredient; B, buffer; CM-β-CD, carboxymethyl-β-CD; CS: chiral selector; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; EBC, exhaled breath condensate; HP-β-CD, hydroxypropyl-β-CD; S-β-CD: sulfated-β-CD; S-γ-CD, highly sulfated-γ-CD; LLOQ, lower limit of quantification; MES, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid; M-β-CD, methyl-β-CD, poly-L,L-SULA, poly-sodium N-undecenoyl-l,l-leucylalaninate; QA-β-CD, quaternary ammonium β-cyclodextrin; S-β-CD, sulfated-β-CD; TEA, triethylamine.

Table 4. Characteristics of the most representative methodologies developed by CE for food analysis. Analyte

Sample

CE modedetection

BGE

LOD

D,L-Citrulline

Food supplements

EKC-UV

CS: 10 mM S-γ-CD B: 100 mM formate (pH 3.0)

0.21 µM (D-Cit) 0.18 µM (L-Cit)

7.82-9.24 µg/mL

Application Analysis of D- and Lcitrulline in food supplements Determination of the stereoisomeric composition of DMAA in food supplements to verify their potential natural origin Analysis of the principal catechins and methylxanthines in green tea samples Chiral analysis of theanine and catechin in the characterization of green tea samples

Ref. [84]

1,3Dimethylamylamine

Food supplements

EKC-UV

CS: 1.1% (w/v) S-α-CD + 0.2 % (w/v) S-β-CD B: 5 mM phosphate/ Tris (pH 3.0) and 10 mM BTEAC

Catechins

Green tea

MEKC-UV

CS: 25 mM HP-β-CD B: 90 mM SDS + 25 mM borate-phosphate (pH 2.5)

-

Theanine and catechins

Green tea

MEKC-UV

CS: 28 mM DM-β-CD B: 65 mM SDS + 25 mM borate-phosphate (pH 2.5)

0.1-02 µg/mL

MEKC-UV

CS: 35 mM β-CD + 6 mM HPβ-CD + 25 mM D-fructose B: 30 mM SDS + 100 mM borate (pH 9.5) + 15% IPA (v/v)

2.5 µM

Determination of D-Glu and D-Asp in rice wine

[88]

MEKC-UV

CS: 30 mM HP-γ-CD B: 75 mM SDS + 30 mM phosphate-15 mM borate (pH 9.0)

0.95-0.99 µg/mL

Determination of the enantiomeric composition of the hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids found in red algae

[89]

EKC-MS

CS: 30 mM (18C6H4)

0.07-1.03 µg/mL

Determination of D- and

[50]

Glutamic acid and aspartic acid

8- and 12Hydroxyeicosatetrae noic acids Proteinogenic amino

Rice wine

Marine Red Algae (Gracilaria vermiculophylla and Gracilaria arcuata) Vinegars

[85]

[86]

[87]

acids

B: 1M formate

D- and L-Malic acid

Apple juice

LE-CEC-UV

D- and L-Tartaric acid and D- and Lmalic acid

Wine

LECE-UV

CS: 5 mM Cu (II) sulfate B: 20 mM ammonium sulfate (60:40 v/v) (pH 3.0) CS: 100 mM D-quinic acid, 10 mM Cu (II), 0.5 mM Al (III) and 0.5 mM CTA-OH B: 20 mM acetate

1.5 mg/L (D-tartaric acid) 3 mg/L (D-malic acid)

L-amino acids in vinegars Determination of malic acid enantiomers in apple juice Determination of Denantiomers of both acids in wines.

[90]

[91]

Abbreviations: B, buffer, BTEAC: benzyltriethylammonium chloride, CS: chiral selector, Cit: citrulline, CTA-OH, hexadecyltrimethylammonium hydroxide; 18C6H4, (−)-(18-crown-6)-2,3,11,12-tetracarboxylic acid; DM-β-CD, 2,6-di-O-methyl-β-cyclodextrin; HP-β-CD, 2-hydroxypropyl-βcyclodextrin; IPA, isopropanol; LECE, ligand exchange capillary electrophoresis; LE-CEC, ligand exchange capillary electrochromatography;, SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate; S-α-CD, sulfated-α- CD; S-β-CD, sulfated-β-CD.

Table 5. Characteristics of the most representative methodologies by CE in other fields. Analyte Duloxetine, terbutaline, econazole, propranolol, verapamil, metoprolol and betaxolol Fenoprop, mecoprop, dichloroprop, 2-(4chlorophenoxy) propionic acid, 2-(3chlorophenoxy)propi onic acid and 2phenoxypropionic acid Duloxetine and econazole Pindolol, atenolol, propranolol and metoprolol Pindolol, atenolol, propranolol and metoprolol

Sample

Wastewater of different treatment plants

River water and wastewater of effluent treatment plants from different Spanish regions

CE modedetection

BGE

LOD

Application

Ref.

EKC-UV

CS: 2% (w/v) S-β-CD B: 25 mM phosphate (pH 3.0)

0.4-1.5 mg/L

Enantiomeric determination of drugs in waste water

[94]

EKC-UV

CS: 20 mM of TM-β-CD + 7 mM of HP-β-CD B: 50 mM phosphate (pH 7.0)

0.1-4.3 µg/L

Enantiomeric determination of phenoxy acid herbicides in water samples

[95]

Daphnia magna

EKC-UV

CS: 15% (w/v) S-β-CD B: 25 mM phosphate (pH 3.0)

0.3-1,1 mg/L

River and ground water

EKC-UV

CS: 1.25% (w/v) M-β-CD B: 50 mM phosphate (pH 2.5)

1-1.6 µg/L

EKC-UV

CS: 1.25% (w/v) M-β-CD B: 50 mM phosphate (pH 2.5)

0.4- 0.6 µg/L

River water and sewage water of the waste water treatment plant (effluent water)

Enantiomer stability and combined toxicity of duloxetine and econazole on Daphnia magna Determination of βblockers in environmental waters Chiral analysis of β blockers in river and sewage water

[96]

[97]

[98]

Neutral amino acids CS: 30 mM γ-CD and 30 mM sodium taurocholate B: 80 mM tetraborate (pH 9.2) and 5% (v/v) ACN Acidic amino acids CS: 30 mM γ-CD B: 80 mM tetraborate (pH 9.2) CS: 20 mM S-γ-CD B: 10 mM formic acid (pH 2.5)

Amino acids

Lake water

Neutral amino acids: MEKCLIF Acidic amino acids: EKC-LIF

8 Amphetaminerelated stimulants

Seized samples

EKC-MS

Amphetamine‐type stimulants and ephedrine

Seized samples

EKC-MS

CS: 0.26% (w/v) S-γ-CD B: 50 mM ammonium formate (pH 2.2)

3.24-8.57 µg/mL

EKC-UV

CS: 80 mM HP-β-CD B: Celixir initiator solution (pH 2.5)

5 µg/mL

24 Design cathinones and phenethylamines

Ketamine and norketamine

Methorphan

Seized samples

Human hair

Human blood

EKC-UV

EKC-UV

CS: 0.1% (w/v) S-γ-CD B: 15 mM Tris-phosphate (pH 2.5) CS: 5 mM HP-β-CD B: 150 mM phosphate (pH 4.4) containing 20% (v/v) of MeOH

Neutral amino acids: 5-100 nM Acidic amino acids: 500-750 nM

2 µg/mL (for (-)ephedrine and (+)pseudoephedrine)

Chiral separation of DLamino acids in lake water

Analysis of seized samples of methamphetamine Analysis of seized samples of amphetamine‐type stimulants and ephedrine Regioisomeric and enantiomeric analysys of cathinones and phenethylamines in seized samples

[42]

[99]

[45]

[100]

0.08 ng/mL

Determination of ketamine in hair from ketamine abusers

[101]

8 ng/mL

Analysis of post-mortem blood samples of corpses overdosed by heroin

[102]

Abbreviations: ACN, acetonitrile; B, buffer; CS, chiral selector; S-γ-CD, sulfated-γ- CD; HP-β-CD, (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin; M-β-CD, methylated-β- CD; LIF, laser-induced fluorescence; S-β-CD: sulfated-β-CD; TM-β-CD, (2,3,6-tri-O-methyl)-β-CD.

Figure 1.

73

Figure 2.

74

Figure 3.

75

Figure 4.

76

Figure 5.

77

Figure 6.

78

Highlights • Most relevant and recent contributions of Chiral CE were reviewed • Fundamentals and characteristics of Chiral CE were described • Most recent technological and methodological developments were presented • Applications in the pharmaceutical, food, biomedical or other fields were included

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.