Chitosan nanoparticles for the delivery of a new compound active against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Chitosan nanoparticles for the delivery of a new compound active against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Journal Pre-proof Chitosan nanoparticles for the delivery of a new compound active against multidrugresistant Staphylococcus aureus Laura Freitas de A...

2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 24 Views

Journal Pre-proof Chitosan nanoparticles for the delivery of a new compound active against multidrugresistant Staphylococcus aureus Laura Freitas de Andrade, Alexsandra Conceição Apolinário, Carlota de Oliveira Rangel-Yagui, Marco Antônio Stephano, Leoberto Costa Tavares PII:

S1773-2247(19)31087-1

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101363

Reference:

JDDST 101363

To appear in:

Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology

Received Date: 31 July 2019 Revised Date:

21 October 2019

Accepted Date: 28 October 2019

Please cite this article as: L.F. de Andrade, Alexsandra.Conceiçã. Apolinário, C. de Oliveira RangelYagui, Marco.Antô. Stephano, L.C. Tavares, Chitosan nanoparticles for the delivery of a new compound active against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101363. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

1 2

Chitosan nanoparticles for the delivery of a new compound active against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

3 4 5 6

Laura Freitas de Andrade, Alexsandra Conceição Apolinário, Carlota de Oliveira Rangel-Yagui, Marco Antônio Stephano, Leoberto Costa Tavares*

7 8

Department of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

9

**Correspondence Author:

10

[email protected]

11

University of Sao Paulo

12

Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 580

13

05508-000 - São Paulo, SP, Brazil

14

+ 55 11 30912385

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33

Abstract: Chitosan is a biopolymer with antimicrobial, analgesic activity, tissue regenerator properties and biofilm protection. The N’-((5-nitrofuran-2-yl)methylen)-2-benzhydrazide, a novel active compound against multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (5-NFB), was incorporated in Polysorbate 20 micelles and further loaded in chitosan nanoparticles (Ch-5-NFB-NP), prepared by ionic gelation varying NaCl concentration. The nanoparticles were characterized by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) to determine size, polydispersity index (PDI) and ζ-potential. Encapsulation Efficiency (EE%) was determined by indirect method and morphology by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). Antimicrobial activity tests against Staphylococcus aureus strains ATCC 29213, hVISA and ORSA were performed with 5-NFB, Ch-5-NFB-NP and empty chitosan nanoparticles (Ch-NP) using colorimetric and microdilution methods by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). In the optimal experiment, the Ch-5-NFB-NP were obtained with average diameter of 321 nm, PDI of 0.18, ζ-P of +37 mV; EE% of 44% and the morphology by SEM showed spherical and regular shaped nanoparticles. The best results for bacterial growth inhibition against all strains tested were observed for Ch-5-NFB-NP. The nanoparticles were lyophilized with different lyoprotectants and the best freeze-dried samples were obtained with lactose and saccharose, keeping the Ch-5-NFB-NP characteristics. Therefore, owing to the antibacterial activity, tissue regenerator property and protective biofilm effect, the Ch-5-NFB-NP are a promising alternative to treat multidrug-resistant infections, especially in burned patients.

34 35 36

Keywords: Nifuroxazide; Chitosan; Nanoparticles; Drug delivery; Multidrug-resistant bacteria; Lyophilization.

2

37

1. INTRODUCTION

38

Antibiotic resistance is one of the main concerns in global health and bacterial resistant

39

strains results in many deaths in hospitals [1]. Infections by multidrug-resistant bacteria is

40

responsible for 700 thousand deaths per year worldwide and this number may increase giving the

41

indiscriminate use of antibiotics in therapeutics and farming, as well as incorrect discharge of

42

these substances[1]. Among the most threatening bacteria, one can highlight penicillin resistant

43

Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus, in particular the following strains:

44

methicilin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), oxacillin resistant S. aureus (ORSA), vancomycin

45

intermediate S. aureus (VISA) and heterogeneous vancomycin intermediate S. aureus (hVISA).

46

Multidrug-resistant strains of anaerobic and facultative aerobic bacteria as S. aureus usually

47

infect burns and cutaneous lesions of large extension, leading to high rates of sepsis in patients

48

and, consequently, high morbidity and mortality [2]. Within this context, novel molecules and/or

49

pharmaceutical formulations with significative activity against these resistant strains are of great

50

interest.

51

Our group has recently synthesized a 5-nitro-2-heterocyclic compound analog to

52

nifuroxazide

(Fig.

1)

that

presented

significant

activity

against

multidrug-resistant

53

microorganisms as S. aureus, S. epidermidis and C. albicans [3]. Although the mechanism of

54

action of this class is not fully elucidated, the bactericidal effect seems to be related to the

55

reduction of the nitro group (-NO2) leading to the generation of free radicals that, in turn,

56

interfere with the cellular metabolism, as DNA and RNA structures and mitochondrial

57

respiration. The nitro-group is more selective to bacterial, fungal and protozoan cells than human

58

cells and the major reduction potential of nitro group is directly linked to increased cellular death

59

[4].

60

61 62 63

Figure 1- Chemical structure of nifuroxazide and its 5-NFB analog: N’-((5-nitrofuran-2-

64

yl)methylene)-2-benzhydrazide.

65

3

66

The nifuroxazide analog N’-((5-nitrofuran-2-yl)methylene)-2-benzhydrazide (5-NFB) can be

67

considered a promising alternative to treat infections by multidrug-resistant microorganisms, it

68

was one of the most potent among the nitro-compound series previously studied [3]. However,

69

the high lipophilicity hinders further evaluation and potential application of this molecule. In this

70

sense, incorporation into nanostructures can be an alternative for the delivery of 5-NFB by

71

promoting higher solubility and improving bioavailability. Additionally, topical administration of

72

nanostructured antimicrobials is advantageous for effective treatment of local disease, such as

73

burned areas, due to their inherent ability to circumvent systemic cytotoxicity and ease of rapid

74

delivery at the site of infection [5,6].

75

Nanostructures based on chitosan biopolymer have been widely studied as drug delivery

76

systems owing to its biocompatibility and low toxicity [7]. Chitosan is an oligomer formed by D-

77

glucosamine and D-glucoacetamide units linked by glucosides β-(1 > 4) bonds (Fig. 2). It is

78

obtained by chitin deacetylation, which provides the polycationic character of chitosan by amines

79

protonation in acid environment [8]. This polymer is able to bind polyanions as sodium

80

tripolyphosphate (TPP), forming hydrogels that can be employed as biofilms, nanoparticles and

81

microparticles [8,9].

82

One interesting point of using chitosan as a biomaterial for nanostructures preparation is that

83

it has analgesic, healing and antibacterial pharmacological activities. The antimicrobial activity of

84

nicin and natamycin incorporated into chitosan nanoparticles, for example, was proved against

85

Salmonella enterica and Penicillium chrysogenum, with 50% and 12.5% of reduction in MIC

86

compared to free-nicin and free-natamycin [11]. Additionally, it presents mucoadhesive

87

proprieties with biofilm formation. All these properties have been encouraging the investigation

88

of chitosan as scaffold for tissue regeneration. The antibacterial activity of chitosan films and

89

chitosan nanoparticles is related to the positive charges of chitosan that bind to the negative

90

charges in bacteria, but the mechanisms of action is not fully known [10]. Chitosan nanoparticles

91

have also been widely studied to increase apparent solubility and bioavailability of drugs. The

92

mucoadhesive property and biofilm formation of chitosan enable higher and prolonged contact to

93

the administration route [12,13], what is of great interest for skin infections such as the ones

94

caused by S. aureus strains.

95

In this paper, we developed chitosan nanoparticles loaded with N’-((5-nitrofuran-2-

96

yl)methylene)-2-benzhydrazide (Ch-5-NFB-NP) by ionic gelation method aiming an stable

4

97

delivery systems. The 5-NFB-loaded chitosan NP were proved to be active in vitro against S.

98

aureus ATCC 29213, hVISA and ORSA strains. Additionally, we investigated the lyophilization

99

process for the nanoparticles developed using glycine, lactose and saccharose as lyoprotectants.

100 101

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

102

2.1. Materials

103

Chitosan (low molecular weight of 50 – 190 kDa and deacetylaytion degree of 75 – 85%),

104

sodium tripolyphosphate (85% of purity), Mueller Hington broth and bromocresol purple were

105

purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). N’-((5-nitrofuran-2-yl)methylen)-2-

106

benzhydrazyde compound (5-NFB) was previously synthesized by our group and duly purified by

107

DMF recrystallization and identified by NMR H1 and NMR C13 (Zorzi et al., 2014). All other

108

reagents were purchased from LabSynth (Diadema, SP, BRA).

109

2.2. Preparation of empty chitosan nanoparticles (Ch-NP) and chitosan/5-NFB nanoparticles

110

(Ch-5-NFB-NP)

111

The Ch-NP and Ch-5-NFB-NP preparation was adapted from a previously described method

112

[11]. Briefly, chitosan (2 mg/mL) was dissolved in acetic acid 1% (pH 5.2); ethanol (10%) and

113

Polysorbate 20 (1.4 mM) were added in the solution. Ch-NP were produced by the dropwise

114

addition of a TPP solution (1 mg/mL) up to 3:1 chitosan/TPP ratio, under magnetic stirring at

115

room temperature during 1 h. For the Ch-5-NFB-NP, a solution of 5-NFB in ethanol (1 mg/mL)

116

was slowly added to the chitosan/ethanol/Polysorbate 20 solution under magnetic stirring before

117

TPP addition. The effect of ionic strength on the Ch-5-NFB-NP colloidal stability was

118

investigated by varying the NaCl concentration (0.75 and 155 mM) in the chitosan and TPP

119

solutions.

120

NPs were purified by centrifugation at 13,000 x g in 10 µL of pure glycerol as support into

121

Eppendorf flasks for 15 minutes. The supernatant was used for indirect determination of the drug

122

encapsulation efficiency (EE%) and the precipitated nanoparticles were resuspended with

123

ultrapure water completing the previous volume.

124

2.3. Nanoparticles Characterization

5

125

The NPs samples were prepared as explained above and they were analyzed by photon

126

correlation spectroscopy (Dynamic Light Scattering) to determine average size and zeta potential

127

both using the Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd, Worcestershire,UK). The size and

128

polydispersity index were measured in an angle of 175º and 532 nm laser, using glass cuvettes.

129

Stokes Einstein equation provided the hydrodynamic diameter from diffusion coefficient values

130

(Equation 1). In addition, particle size distribution was provided by cumulant analysis method.

131

The mobility was then related to the ζ-potential using the Henry equation (Equation 2). All

132

measurements were performed at least three times.

133 =

134





(Equation 1)

135

in which: kB = Boltzmann constant (1.38064852 × 10 − 23 J/K), T = temperature, η = absolute

136

viscosity of the PBS and Rh = hydrodynamic radius.

137 UE =

138

(

)

(Equation 2)

139

in which: UE = electrophoretic mobility, z = zeta potential, ε = dielectric constant, η = viscosity

140

and f(κa) = Henry’s function.

141 142

2.4. Encapsulation efficiency

143

The percentage of encapsulation efficiency (EE%) was calculated indirectly from the

144

difference between the initial total amount of 5-NFB added to the system and the amount of 5-

145

NFB in the supernatant after centrifugation (free compound), as presented in Eq. 3. The 5-NFB

146

concentration in supernatant was measured by UV spectrophotometry at 370 nm, in a UV/VIS

147

spectrophotometry (Spectra Max Plus 384– Molecular Devices).

148 149

EE% = Total amount of 5-NFB – Supernatant amount of 5-NFB x 100

150 151 152

Total amount of 5-NFB 2.6. Thermal analyses

(Equation 3)

6

153

Thermal analyses were performed to obtain important parameters for freeze-drying process

154

as collapse temperature (Tc), glass transition temperature (Tg) and eutectic temperature (Te) of

155

Ch-5-NFB-NP with the excipients glycine, saccharose and lactose at concentrations of 0, 2.5, 5

156

and 10 %. The Ch-5-NFB-NP was analyzed by DSC - Differential Scanning Calorimetry (Perkin

157

Elmer precisely, DSC 4000). The samples were frozen at -60 ºC and after that, heated to 20 ºC at

158

10 ºC/min to obtain the Tg.

159

To observe the behavior of Ch-5-NFB-NP in freeze-drying process and to obtain the Tc, the

160

samples were analyzed by freeze drying microscopy (FDM) (Lyostat 2, TMS94, Linkam

161

Instruments, Surrey, UK). The samples were frozen to -60 ºC and heated to 10 ºC at 10 ºC/min

162

with 100 mTorr of vacuum.

163

2.7. Nanoparticles freeze-drying

164

Freeze drying was performed in an FTS system TDS-00209-A (SP scientific, Warminster,

165

PA). Ch-5-NFB-NP samples with different concentrations of glycine, lactose and saccharose

166

were freeze-dried at -40 ºC in primary drying and 10 ºC in secondary drying, both at 100 mTorr.

167

The freeze-dried Ch-5-NFB-NP were analyzed by cake appearance; relative moisture using

168

moisture analyzer (Computrac®, Arizona Instrument) and reconstitution time with ultrapure

169

water. DLS and ζ-P measurements were also performed with the samples after reconstitution with

170

ultrapure water to evaluate nanoparticles size, PDI and surface charge.

171

2.8. Scanning Electronic Microscopy

172

One drop of the nanoparticle suspension (Ch-5-NFB-NP and Ch-NP samples) was poured on

173

a glass blade and dried into desiccator in the presence of phosphorus pentoxide. Following, the

174

samples were coated with platinum in equipment Bal-Tec/MED020 in the Laboratory of

175

Technological Characterization (Polytechnique Institute of University of Sao Paulo) and analyzed

176

by Scanning Electronic Microscopy (Quanta 650 FEG, FEI) at 5 kV.

177

2.5. Antimicrobial activity assay

178

S. aureus ATCC 29213, hVISA and ORSA strains were isolated from infected patients at the

179

University Hospital – University of Sao Paulo and maintained frozen in glycerol. Resistance of

180

hVISA and ORSA against oxacillin and vancomycin was determined by disc-diffusion method,

181

using 30 µg of vancomycin and 1 µg of oxacillin.

7

182

The S. aureus strains were cultivated in test tubes with TSB (tripcasein soy beef) for 24 h in

183

a B.O.D. incubator (biochemical oxygen demand) at 35 ºC. After that, 1 mL of each culture was

184

transferred to 4 mL of Mueller-Hington (MH) broth and cultivated in a B.O.D. incubator for 24 h

185

at 35 ºC. The turbidity of the cultures at 580 nm was then adjusted with culture medium to 0.5

186

according to the Mc Farland scale, in which the absorbance must be between 0.08 and 0.1,

187

resulting in a solution of 108 CFU/mL. Samples of 1 mL of this adjusted culture were diluted in

188

99 mL of NaCl 0.9% solution and, subsequently, samples of 1 mL of the diluted solutions were

189

diluted in 99 mL of MH broth, resulting in 104 CFU/mL final inocula. These final inocula were

190

used to minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations. MIC was determined by

191

colorimetric method using bromocresol purple as dye and mannitol as carbohydrate source [14].

192

Different concentrations of 5-NFB, Ch-5-NFB-NP and Ch-NP were tested against S. aureus

193

ATCC 29213, hVISA and ORSA by microdilution method in 96 wells microplates with MH broth

194

as culture medium, DMSO 4%, bromocresol purple 0.01% and mannitol 0.1%. Microplates were

195

incubated for 18 hours at 37 oC in a B.O.D. incubator and positive and negative controls were

196

present in all tests. The MICs were determined by the color change on the minimal concentration

197

from purple (no bacterial growth) to yellow (bacterial growth). The tests were made in triplicate.

198

The assay was performed with 5-NFB and Ch-5-NFB-NP at drug concentrations from 0.1 to 9

199

µM with 0.5 µM interval. Additionally, Ch-NP tests were performed at the same dilutions used

200

for Ch-5-NFB-NP.

201 202

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

203

3.1. Nanoparticles preparation and characterization

204

The gelation method is based on ionic interactions between the positive charges of chitosan

205

amino groups with negative charges of sodium tripolyphosphate as crosslink agent, forming a

206

polyeletrolytic complex (PEC). Here the gelation method was adapted since the 5-NFB presents a

207

hydrophobic character and this method is more suitable for hydrophilic molecules, due to the

208

hydrophilic solvents used in the process. Therefore, a co-solvent (ethanol) and a surfactant

209

(Polysorbate 20) were used to improve the apparent solubility of 5-NFB, which was determined

210

to be 1 mg/mL. Aiming at biocompatible formulations for future application in burn patients,

211

nontoxic solvents, co-solvents and surfactants were employed.

8

212

According to Wu et al., 2005 [15], NaCl can be used to control size and PDI of chitosan

213

nanoparticles. In this paper, Ch-5-NFB-NP were prepared at different NaCl concentrations and

214

the effect on average size (d, nm), polydispersity index (PDI) encapsulation efficiency (EE%) and

215

ζ-potential can be observed in Table 1.

216 217 218 219 220

Table 1- CH-5-NFB-NP and Ch-NP characterization, as a function of NaCl concentration. Values of average size, polidispersity index, ζ-potential and encapsulation efficiency (EE%) for the chitosan nanoparticles. Error bars correspond to standard deviations of three measurements. System CH-5-NFB-NP CH-NP

NaCl (mM) 0 75 155 0

Average size (d, nm) 322 ± 17 523 ± 51 458 ± 75 320 ± 16

PDI 0.180 ± 0.004 0.230 ± 0.036 0.196 ± 0,04 0.202 ± 0.04

ζ-Potential (mV) EE (%)

+37.3 ± 5.8 +43.4 ± 5.5 +47.1 ± 4.6 +32.3 ± 6.9

44 ± 3 8±2 4±2 -

221 222 223

The target nanoparticle size varies depending on application. For systemic applications,

224

usually nanoparticles of up to 200 nm are desired to avoid nanoparticles accumulation and blood

225

vessels clogging [16]. For topical application such as skin lesions, on the other hand,

226

nanoparticles can present sizes larger than 200 nm to promote drug delivery locally [16].

227

Therefore, the nanoparticles obtained can be considered suitable for skin lesions treatment, since

228

sizes varied from 320 up to 523 nm. All systems presented monomodal size distributions with

229

only one peak for scattering intensity, indicating that systems were reasonably uniform in particle

230

size. Additionally, PDI values were below 0.230, what is considered adequate for pharmaceutical

231

application [17]. Regarding the ζ-Potential, it is accepted that absolute values above 30 mV

232

usually result in colloidal stability in charged systems [17]. The systems developed presented

233

values higher than + 30 mV corresponding to positively charged stable chitosan nanoparticles.

234

The nanoparticle size was found to increase with NaCl addition, probably due to

235

destabilization of nanoparticles charges by electrostatic shielding [18]. With the increased ionic

236

strength, chitosan molecules adopt less extended conformations and the increased shielding effect

237

of counter-ions results in less cross-linking points on chitosan to be accessed by TPP, increasing

238

particles size. The NaCl influence on ζ-potential was less significant and might be explained by

239

the increase in ionic strength at the superficial layer of the nanoparticle that influences chitosan

240

electrophoretic mobility [19].

9

241

As can also be seen in Table 1, encapsulation efficiency decreased with NaCl concentration,

242

what was not expected since nanostructures presented increased size with increasing salt

243

concentrations. We believe the salt might have an effect on polysorbate micelles that in turn are

244

responsible for 5-NFB solubilization. Since Polysorbate 20 concentration in the systems is above

245

its critical micellar concentration (CMC = 0.06 mM, Daltin, 2011), micelles are supposed to be

246

present. Owing to the hydrophobic effect, one would expect 5-NFB to partition preferentially to

247

the hydrophobic compartment of polysorbate micelles. In fact, polysorbate micelles were

248

identified in the system by DLS before TPP addition, with average diameters of 13.3 nm (empty

249

micelles) and 12.2 nm (micelles in the presence of 5-NFB). Therefore, we assumed that 5-NFB is

250

solubilized in Polysorbate micelles, which are further incorporated in chitosan nanoparticles. To

251

better prove our hypothesis, we compared chitosan nanoparticles prepared in the absence of

252

Polysorbate 20 with the Ch-NP with and without the 5-NFB (Table 2). As can be seen, an

253

increase in the nanoparticles size is observed in the presence of Polysorbate 20, probably due to

254

the chitosan gelation process in the presence of the surfactant micelles that are incorporated.

255

Regarding the NaCl effect on the micelles, it is well known that nonionic micelles of surfactants

256

with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) head groups suffer influence of salt addition due to the

257

dehydration of the PEO corona, since water molecules would rather interact with NaCl ions [20].

258

This effect might decrease the internal micellar volume for 5-NFB solubilization. Additionally,

259

increasing NaCl concentration might also lower the compound apparent water solubility.

260 261 262 263

Table 2- Chitosan nanoparticles (CH-NP) average size and polydispersity index (PDI) in the presence or not of polysorbate 20 (P20). Error bars correspond to standard deviations of three measurements. System CH-NP without P20 CH-NP with P20 CH-5-NFB-NP with P20

Average size (d, nm) 209.2 ± 1.7 320.2 ± 3.1 321.5 ± 3.2

PDI 0.157 ± 0.02 0.202 ± 0.01 0.180 ± 0.01

264 265

Our results show the influence of salt concentration in chitosan nanoparticles size, PDI

266

and zeta potential. More important, we show that for systems with nonionic surfactants, salt

267

addition is deleterious, especially if the drug is preferentially incorporate in the surfactant

268

micelles. Also, we show that chitosan nanoparticles can be an alternative for hydrophobic drugs

269

incorporation when the drug is initially solubilized in surfactant micelles.

10

270

3.2. Thermal analyses

271

The DSC analyses were performed with Ch-5-NFB-NP at different concentrations of

272

saccharose, lactose and glycine (0, 2.5, 5 and 10%) to determine the glass transition temperature

273

(Tg’) and eutectic temperature (Teut) (Table 3). The lyophilization with optical microscopy was

274

performed with the samples to determine the collapse temperature (Tcol). The Tg’ is defined by

275

the transition of viscous state (bloody) to stiff state of amorphous solid in freezing process, with

276

viscosity increase. The Teut is the collapse temperature of crystalline compounds between

277

freezing and melting point of these compounds. The Tcol is the temperature that the frozen

278

structure does not support itself in the primary drying because of high water mobility [21].

279

Determination of Tg’, Teut and Tcol is very important for freeze-drying processes because

280

the amorphous or crystalline solid have to be in stiff state during primary freeze-drying. If the

281

primary drying occurs above Tg’, Teut and Tcol, the water is sufficient free in interstitial region

282

and can no longer keep its original configuration, leading to a collapse duo to low matrix

283

viscosity above these temperatures. So, the freeze-drying has to occur below Tg’, Teut and Tcol.

284

According to DSC analyses, the sample CH-5-NFB-NP 2.5% glycine did not present a Tg’. The

285

samples CH-NP, Ch-5-NFB-NP 10% lactose, CH-5-NFB-NP 10% glycine and all concentrations

286

of CH-5-NFB-NP saccharose did not present Teut. The Teut demonstrated in CH-5-NFB-NP

287

evidence the crystalline character of 5-NFB in CH-5-NFB-NP.

288 289

The Tcol was determined base optical cryomicroscopy images (Figure 2) to preview the minimal temperature that freeze-drying process have to occur without “cake” collapse.

11

290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299

Figure 2- Microscope images of lyophilization process of CH-5-NFB-NP without excipients. a) liquid structure; b) frozen structure; c) freeze-drying layer; d) microcollapse; e) macrocollapse; f) total collapse. This experiment was performed with glycine, lactose and saccharose at 2.5, 5 and 10%.

Table 3- Values of Teut, Tg’and Tcol (°C) for CH-5-NFB-NP with lactose, saccharose, glycine and water as excipients. Excipient

Tcol

-3.4 -2.4 -

-38.8 -39.9 -44.4 -35.0

-35.5 -28.0 -37.3 -26.4

5% 2.5% 10%

-

-35.0 -37.0 -37.0

-26.6 -23.2 -3.9

5% 2.5%

-5.2 -7.8

-24.0 -

-11.3 -38.5

-

1.4

-

-24.3

Saccharose

Glycine

Lactose

Water

300

Tg’

Concentration 10% 5% 2.5% 10%

Teut

12

301

In freeze-drying process, the higher the Tg’ and Tcol’ temperatures the faster and cheaper is

302

the process. Temperatures below -40 °C are not viable, since the process becomes slow and

303

expansive. The higher Tg’ was observed with Ch-5-NFB-NP 5% glycine (Tg’= -24 °C) and the

304

higher Tcol was observed with CH-5-NFB-NP 10% glycine (-3.9 °C).

305

3.3 Freeze-drying

306

In freeze-drying process excipients are usually employed as bulking agents, lyoprotectants

307

and cryoprotectants. Among them, one can cite polysaccharides, saccharides, proteins and

308

aminoacids. The bulking agents are responsible to provide volume to dry matrix, replacing the

309

water and forming a crystalline structure that supports the cake. Additionally, cryoprotectants

310

protect the active agent during freeze-drying process [20]. The primary freeze-drying process

311

occurred with about 20 hours and the cakes were kept under vacuum (Figure 3).

312

1

2

3

4 313 314 315 316 317

Figure 3- Lyophilized cakes of CH-5-NFB-NP with different excipients. Line 1: water; Line 2: glycine at 2.5, 5 and 10%; Line 3: lactose at 2.5, 5 and 10%; Line 4: 2.5, 5 and 10%.

13

318

The glycine cakes were adequate, with no shrinkages and cracks, considered ideal to the

319

formulation preservation, transportation and commercialization. The CH-5-NFB-NP lyophilized

320

cakes with lactose and saccharose were acceptable, but presented shrinkages and cracks, most of

321

them not associated with collapse. These phenomena are related with stress in primary drying, in

322

which the water in the sample leaves the structure causing stress and forming shrinkages and/or

323

cracks. Shrinkages are usually associated to low concentrations of bulking agents and cracks are

324

associated to high concentrations. However, these events are acceptable and do not interfere in

325

product quality, except to possible cake deconfiguration during transportation [22].

326

All cakes were immediately resuspended in ultrapure water and the characteristics of the

327

reconstituted systems are presented in Table 4. Glycine is widely employed as bulking agent in

328

freeze-drying process due to its low Tg’ and Tcol’, resulting in elegant cakes. Additionally,

329

glycine is safe and biocompatible as an excipient. In our case glycine did not result in adequate

330

systems after the nanoparticles reconstitution. The CH-5-NFB-NP with glycine 2.5% and 5%

331

presented aggregates a few minutes after reconstitution, as can be seen for the high PDI values

332

observed for both samples. Only the highest concentration of glycine (10%) was able to stabilize

333

the CH-5-NFB-NP, visually preserving colloidal stability. In neutral pH, glycine is totally ionized

334

and the negative charges of the carboxylic groups can electrostatically interact with the positive

335

nanoparticles surface. As a consequence, glycine may shields the nanoparticles surface resulting

336

in lower zeta potential value, since the amine groups of glycine that will be at the nanoparticles

337

surface are weaker than amine groups of chitosan. At lower zeta potential values, nanoparticles

338

aggregation was observed.

339 340

Table 4- Lyophilized CH-5-NFB-NP characteristics after resuspension. Lyophilized Sample

Average size (d.nm)

PDI

Zeta Potential (mV)

CH-5-NFB-NP

Not resuspend

-

-

Relative Moisture (%) 3.5

CH-5-NFB-NP

607.0 ± 21.5

glycine 2.5%

(aggregates)

0.765 ± 0.19

+12.9 ± 4.75

3.55

CH-5-NFB-NP

352.4 ± 5.23

glycine 5%

(aggregates)

0.440 ± 0.09

+16.4 ± 4.64

2.49

14

CH-5-NFB-NP glycine 10% CH-5-NFB-NP lactose 2.5% CH-5-NFB-NP lactose 5% CH-5-NFB-NP lactose 10% CH-5-NFB-NP saccharose 2.5% CH-5-NFB-NP saccharose 5% CH-5-NFB-NP saccharose 10%

305.1 ± 3.24

0.251 ± 0.021

+20.3 ± 4.31

2.18

295.5 ± 4.21

0.239 ± 0.034

+31.1 ± 5.31

3.67

299.2 ± 2.49

0.228 ± 0.018

+29.7 ± 4.24

2.80

336.7 ± 3.29

0.259 ± 0.016

+20.9 ± 4.68

1.38

317.4 ± 2.23

0.233 ± 0.019

+33.0 ± 6.26

5.41

331.1 ± 4.5

0.229 ± 0.035

+31.8 ± 5.13

3.73

347.1 ± 2.56

0.253 ± 0.024

+22.6 ± 4.39

3.13

341 342

Both saccharose and lactose were able to preserve the nanoparticles characteristics at all

343

concentrations, except the saccharose 2.5% that resulted in a high moisture (5.41 %) for

344

lyophilized products[20]. For these lyoprotectants, the only interactions are the hydrogen bonds

345

among water molecules and the nanoparticles. Based on our results and previous ones by Allison,

346

Brynildsen and Collins et al. (2011)[23], we believe that saccharose at 5 and 10% can be

347

considered the best lyoprotectant since it demonstrated to be useful for bacterial resistance

348

combat, in which the saccharides were responsible to “wake-up” the latent bacteria, facilitating

349

the bactericidal agents activity.

350

3.4 Scanning Electron Microscopy, (SEM)

351

The morphology of CH-NP and Ch-5-NFB-NP were observed by SEM and, based on the

352

images obtained (Figure 4), both CH-NP and Ch-5-NFB-NP can be considered spherical and with

353

an average diameter of 450 nm, what is significantly larger that the values obtained by DLS

354

measurements (320 nm). We believe this difference might result from the staining process and

355

also from some degree of polymer melting during SEM analysis, owing to the increase in sample

15

356

temperature with the laser beam incidence on the nanoparticles. Nonetheless, SEM is important

357

to confirm the nanoparticles shape, whereas DLS is more adequate to estimate the polymer

358

nanoparticles average size.

359 360 361

Figure 4- Scanning electron microscopy images. a) CH-NP (scale bar = 10 µm) and b) CH-5NFB-NP (scale bar = 5 µm).

362 363

3.5. Antimicrobial activity assay

364

The antimicrobial activity of 5-NFB, CH-5-NFB-NP and CH-NP 5-NFB was determined

365

against strains of S. aureus ATCC 29213, hVISA and ORSA by minimal inhibitory concentration

366

(MIC) and results are presented in Table 5.

367 368 369 370 371

372 373

Table 5- Minimal inhibitory concentration of 5-NFB, CH-5-NFB-NP and CH-NP against S. aureus strains ATCC 29213, hVISA and ORSA, considering 5-NFB MIC present into nanoparticles and nanoparticles MIC (Nps). Error bars correspond to standard deviations of three measurements. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

1.4 – 1.5

CH-5-NFB-NP 5-NFB MIC (µg/mL) 0.4 – 0.5

CH-5-NFB-NP Nps MIC (µg/mL) 10.9 – 14.6

CH-NP Nps MIC (µg/mL) 24.3 – 40.4

Hvisa

1.4 – 1.5

0.8 – 0.9

14.6 – 21.9

24.3 – 32.3

ORSA

2.2 – 2.3

0.6 – 0.8

18.3 – 21.9

24.3 – 32.3

S. aureus strain

5-NFB (µg/mL)

ATCC 29213

16

374

According to the results, 5-NFB showed higher activity against ATCC 29213 and hVISA

375

strains and was less active against ORSA. Previously, our group demonstrated that the 5-NFB

376

activity against ATCC 29213 (5.8 µM) is superior to nifuroxazide (16.0 – 4.0 µM) and

377

vancomycin (<20 µM) [3]. The CH-5-NFB-NP activity was 3 times higher than 5-NFB (in

378

relation to CH-5-NFB-NP/ 5-NFB MIC) and 2 times higher than CH-NP (in relation to CH-5-

379

NFB-NP/ Nps MIC) against ATCC 29213; 2 times higher than 5-NFB (in relation to CH-5-NFB-

380

NP/ 5-NFB MIC) and 1.7 times higher than CH-NP (in relation to Ch-5-NFB-NP/ Nps MIC)

381

against hVISA; 3 times higher than 5-NFB (in relation to CH-5-NFB-NP/ 5-NFB MIC) and 1.3

382

times higher than CH-NP against ORSA (in relation to CH-5-NFB-NP/ Nps MIC). Our results

383

point to a synergistic effect of 5-NFB and chitosan nanoparticles since the concentration of

384

compound and chitosan nanoparticles in the CH-5-NFB-NP necessary to inhibit the bacterial

385

growth is lower than 5-NFB and Ch-NP isolated effects. The antibacterial mechanism of 5-NFB

386

is related to reduction of nitro group in toxic radicals that interferes in DNA and RNA cellular

387

synthesis [3]; the antibacterial mechanism of chitosan, on the other hand, is related to its

388

protonated amino groups that may interact with negative charges of bacterial proteins and other

389

cellular constituents [8]. This is very interesting regarding antibacterial resistance, when two or

390

more antibacterial agents used together with distinct mechanisms may decrease the antimicrobial

391

resistance [24]. These results demonstrated that this formulation could be effective to eliminate

392

resistant infections.

393 394

4. CONCLUSIONS

395

In this paper, we present a novel formulation for a promising antibacterial compound, 5-

396

NFB: N’-((5-nitrofuran-2-yl)methylene)-2-benzhydrazide. Since it is a hydrophobic compound,

397

we solubilized it in Polysorbate 20 micelles that were further incorporated in chitosan

398

nanoparticles. The CH5-NFB-NP presented a diameter of 321 nm, PDI of 0.18, ζP +37 mV and

399

an encapsulation efficiency of 44%, resulting in good parameters to topical application and

400

nanoparticles stability. Samples were successfully lyophilized using saccharose or lactose as bulk

401

agents. and SEM analyses showed spherical and regular nanoparticles. The CH-5-NFB-NP

402

presented increased activity in comparison to the free compound and empty chitosan

403

nanoparticles (CH-NP) against all S. aureus strains, including multidrug-resistant strains (hVISA

404

and ORSA). In addition, our results point to a synergic antimicrobial activity between chitosan

17

405

nanoparticles and 5-NFB. Therefore, CH-5-NFB-NP demonstrated to be a promising alternative

406

for the treatment of S. aureus infections, especially in skin burned areas. On a broader

407

perspective, several papers present interesting results in the design and preparation of chitosan

408

nanoparticles. However, they are usually designed for the incorporation of drugs based on

409

entrapment and/or electrostatic interactions of the drugs with the cross-linked chitosan net. This

410

is the first time a complex system based on the encapsulation of a hydrophobic drug into

411

Polysorbate micelles with further entrapment in chitosan nanoparticles is described. It opens the

412

possibility of other hydrophobic drugs incorporation into similar systems.

413

Acknowledgments

414

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Coordination for the Improvement of

415

Higher Education Personnel - CAPES (Process 001) and the National Council for Scientific

416

and Technological Development-CNPQ.

417

REFERENCES

418 419

[1]

World Health Organization (WHO), Antimicrobial resistance: Global report on surveillance, 2014.

420 421

[2]

A. Gragnani, M. L. Gonçalves, G. Feriani, L.M. Ferreira, Análise microbiológica em queimaduras, Rev. Basileira Cir. Plástica. 20 (2005) 237–240.

422 423 424 425

[3]

R. Zorzi, S. Dória, F. Palace-Berl, K. F. M. Pasqualoto, L. De Sá, A. Murillo, D.C. Siqueira, L. C. Tavares. Exploring 5-nitrofuran derivatives against nosocomial pathogens : Synthesis , antimicrobial activity and chemometric analysis, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry. 22 (2014) 2844–2854. doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2014.03.044.

426 427 428 429

[4]

F.R. Paula, G.H.G Trossini, E.I. Ferreira, S.H.P Serrano, C.M.S. Menezes, L.C. Tavares. Theoretical and voltammetric studies of 5-nitro-heterocyclic derivates with potential trypanocidal activities. J. Braz. Chem. Society. 21 (2010). 740-749. doi: 10.1590/S010350532010000400022.

430 431

[5]

N. Durán, M. Durán, L. Tasic, P.D. Marcato, Tecnologia de nanocristais em fármacos, Quim. Nova. 33 (2010) 151–158. doi:10.1590/S0100-40422010000100028.

432 433 434 435

[6]

T. Ramasamy, H.B. Ruttala, B. Gupta, B.K. Poudel, H.G. Choi, C.S. Yong, J.O. Kim, Smart chemistry-based nanosized drug delivery systems for systemic applications: A comprehensive review, J. Control. Release. 258 (2017) 226–253. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.04.043.

436

[7]

A.C. Anselmo, S. Mitragotri, An overview of clinical and commercial impact of drug

18

437 438

delivery systems, J. Control. Release. 190 (2014) 15–28. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.053.

439 440 441

[8]

S.K. Shukla, A.K. Mishra, O.A. Arotiba, B.B. Mamba, Chitosan-based nanomaterials : A state-of-the-art review, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 59 (2013) 46–58. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.04.043.

442 443 444

[9]

S. Naskar, S. Sharma, K. Kuotsu, Chitosan-based nanoparticles: An overview of biomedical applications and its preparation, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 49 (2019) 66–81. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2018.10.022.

445 446

[10]

R.C.F. Cheung, T.B. Ng, J.H. Wong, W.Y. Chan, Chitosan: An Update on Potential Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Applications, 2015. doi:10.3390/md13085156.

447 448 449 450

[11]

O.M. Sharaf, M.S. Al-Gamal, G.A. Ibrahim, N.M. Dabiza, S.S. Salem, M.F. El-ssayde, A.M. Youssef Evaluation and Characterization of some protective culture Metabolites in free and nano-chitosan-loaded forms against Common Contaminants of Egyptian Cheese. Carbohydrate Polymers (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115094

451 452 453

[12]

B.S. Kang, S.E. Lee, C.L. Ng, J.K. Kim, J.S. Park, Exploring the Preparation of Albendazole-Loaded Chitosan-Tripolyphosphate Nanoparticles, Materials (Basel). 8 (2015) 486–498. doi:10.3390/ma8020486.

454 455 456

[13]

P. Calvo, M.J. Alonso,.C. Ramunan-Lopez, J.L. Vila-Jato, Novel Hydrophilic Chitosan– Polyethylene Oxide Nanoparticles as Protein Carriers, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 63 (1997) 125– 132. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970103)63:1<125::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-4.

457 458 459 460 461

[14]

L.O. Tippett, L.D. Zeleznick, C. A. Robb, Modification of the microtiter technique for antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing by incorporation of indicators., Appl. Microbiol. 20 (1970) 342–5. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=376936&tool=pmcentrez&ren dertype=abstract.

462 463 464

[15]

Y. Wu, W. Yang, C. Wang, J. Hu, S. Fu, Chitosan nanoparticles as a novel delivery system for ammonium glycyrrhizinate, Int. J. Pharm. 295 (2005) 235–245. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.01.042.

465 466 467

[16]

M. Gaumet, A. Vargas, R. Gurny, F. Delie, Nanoparticles for drug delivery : The need for precision in reporting particle size parameters, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 69 (2008) 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.08.001.

468 469

[17]

M. R. Sanchéz-Domingues, Nanocolloids: Meeting point for scientists and technologists, Elsevier, Oxford, 2016.

470 471 472 473

[18]

J. Du, R. Sun, S. Zhang, L.F. Zhang, C.D. Xiong, Y.X. Peng, Novel polyelectrolyte carboxymethyl konjac glucomannan-chitosan nanoparticles for drug delivery. I. Physicochemical characterization of the carboxymethyl konjac glucomannan-chitosan nanoparticles, Biopolymers. 78 (2005) 1–8. doi:10.1002/bip.20119.

19

474 475 476

[19]

E.D. J. Irigoyen, S. E. Moya, J. J. Iturri, I. Larena, O. Azzaroni, Specific ζ-potential response of layer-by-layer coated colloidal particles triggered by polyelectrolyte ion interactions, Langmuir. 25 (2009) 3374–3380. doi:10.1021/la803360n.

477 478 479

[20]

J.A. Molina-Bolívar, J. Aguiar, C. Carnero Ruiz, Growth and hydration of triton X-100 micelles in monovalent alkali salts: A light scattering study, J. Phys. Chem. B. 106 (2002) 870–877. doi:10.1021/jp0119936.

480 481

[21]

T. Jennings, Lyophilization: introduction and basic principles, Informa Healthcare USA, Inc, New York, 2008.

482 483 484

[22]

S.M. Patel, S.L. Nail, M.J. Pikal, R. Geidobler, G. Winter, A. Hawe, J. Davagnino, S. Rambhatla Gupta, Lyophilized Drug Product Cake Appearance: What Is Acceptable?, J. Pharm. Sci. 106 (2017) 1706–1721. doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2017.03.014.

485 486

[23]

K.R. Allison, M.P. Brynildsen, J.J. Collins, Metabolite-enabled eradication of bacterial persisters by aminoglycosides, Nature. 473 (2011) 216–220. doi:10.1038/nature10069.

487 488 489

[24]

T. Bollenbach, Antimicrobial interactions: Mechanisms and implications for drug discovery and resistance evolution, Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 27 (2015) 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2015.05.008.

490 491 492

Highlights ““Chitosan nanoparticles for the delivery of a new compound active against multidrugresistant Staphylococcus aureus” Laura Freitas de Andrade, Alexsandra Conceição Apolinário, Carlota de Oliveira RangelYagui, Marco Antonio Stephano, Leoberto Costa Tavares. • • •

The efficient loading of lipophilic compound 5-NFB into chitosan nanoparticles; Efficient lyophilization of Ch-5-NFB-NP with lactose and sacharose as bulk agents; Great activity of Ch-5-NFB-NP against multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Conflict of Interest Statement

“Chitosan nanoparticles for the delivery of a new compound active against multidrugresistant Staphylococcus aureus” The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Laura Freitas de Andrade Alexsandra Conceição Apolinário Carlota de Oliveira Rangel-Yagui Marco Antonio Stephano Leoberto Costa Tavares