Email:
[email protected]
Login
Register
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Português
Home
Add new document
Sign In
Create An Account
Comparative Evaluation of Two Calix-Crown-6 Compounds for Cesium Transport from Acidic Feed Solutions
HOME
Comparative Evaluation of Two Calix-Crown-6 Compounds for Cesium Transport from Acidic Feed Solutions
Comparative Evaluation of Two Calix-Crown-6 Compounds for Cesium Transport from Acidic Feed Solutions
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 44 (2012) 961 – 963 (XURPHPEUDQH&RQIHUHQFH >3@ &RPSDUDWLYHHYDOXDWLRQRI...
Download PDF
143KB Sizes
1 Downloads
51 Views
Report
Recommend Documents
Evaluation of electrochemical properties for CrMoV steel in acidic solutions to determine embrittlement—I. Open circuit potential measurements in acidic aqueous solutions of various organic compounds
Evaluation of ammonium molybdophosphate-polyacrylonitrile (AMP-PAN) as a cesium selective sorbent for the removal of 137Cs from acidic nuclear waste solutions
Evaluation of graphitized carbon black as a selective adsorbent for extracting acidic organic compounds from water
A simulation-based comparative evaluation of transport protocols for SIP
Comparative evaluation of methods predicting water solubility for organic compounds
Design and evaluation of electric solutions for public transport
Comparative chemical clarification for silica removal from RO groundwater feed
Adsorption of cobal, zinc, barium and cesium from dilute solutions
Separation of cesium from fission product waste solutions
On two variational methods for obtaining solutions to transport problems
Evaluation of two calix-crown-6 ligands for the recovery of radio cesium from nuclear waste solutions: Solvent extraction and liquid membrane studies
Comparative evaluation of two rapid methods for differentiating mycobacteria
PDF Reader
Full Text
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Procedia Engineering 44 (2012) 961 – 963
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
2+
2+ 2+
+2
2&+ 2+
2+ &+2
&V&2 &+&1UHIOX[K SHQWDHWK\OHQHJO\FROGLWRV\ODWH
1877-7058 © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.637
2&+
2&+ 2
2
2
2
2
2
962
P.K. Mohapatra et al. / Procedia Engineering 44 (2012) 961 – 963
6FKHPH,
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
&VWUDQVSRUWHG
&0& &1& )LWWHGOLQHV
7LPHPLQXWHV
)LJ&RPSDUDWLYHSURILOHVRI&VWUDQVSRUWFRQWDLQLQJ[ 0 &1&DQG&0&LQ132(QGRGHFDQHDORQJZLWK$ODPLQH DVWKHFDUULHUVROYHQW)HHG0+125HFHLYHU'LVWLOOHGZDWHU
7DEOH 6ROYHQW H[WUDFWLRQ DQG WUDQVSRUW GDWD IRU &V, XVLQJ [ 0 FDOL[FURZQ H[WUDFWDQWLQ132(QGRGHFDQHFRQWDLQLQJ$ODPLQH ([WUDFWDQW
'([WU $T SKDVH '6WULS $T SKDVH 3FPV 0+12 'LVWLOOHGZDWHU
&1&
[
&0&
[
5HIHUHQFHV
'HIIFP V
[
[
0RODU YROXPH
P.K. Mohapatra et al. / Procedia Engineering 44 (2012) 961 – 963
::6FKXO]/$%UD\6HS6FL7HFKQRO =$VIDULHWDO$QDO&KHP 3.0RKDSDWUD36'KDPL63DQMD3-DJDVLD6&7ULSDWKL3.'H\DQG9. 0DQFKDQGD'HV:DWHU7UHDW '55DXW3.0RKDSDWUDDQG9.0DQFKDQGD-0HPEU6FL &5:LONHDQG3&KDQJ$,&K(- .H\ZRUGV&DOL[FURZQ5DGLRFHVLXP6XSSRUWHGOLTXLGPHPEUDQH:DVWHPDQDJHPHQW
963
×
Report "Comparative Evaluation of Two Calix-Crown-6 Compounds for Cesium Transport from Acidic Feed Solutions"
Your name
Email
Reason
-Select Reason-
Pornographic
Defamatory
Illegal/Unlawful
Spam
Other Terms Of Service Violation
File a copyright complaint
Description
Our partners will collect data and use cookies for ad personalization and measurement.
Learn how we and our ad partner Google, collect and use data
.
Agree & close