Complexes of amine cations with lasalocid A, a microbial ionophore

Complexes of amine cations with lasalocid A, a microbial ionophore

0064OiW85 S3.00+.00 Q 1985Pcrgaa~x1 RedaLtd. Temhedim Vol. 41, No. 20. pp. 4437 to 4442, 1985 Printed in GreatBritin. Caplexes of Amine Cations wit...

488KB Sizes 0 Downloads 40 Views

0064OiW85 S3.00+.00 Q 1985Pcrgaa~x1 RedaLtd.

Temhedim Vol. 41, No. 20. pp. 4437 to 4442, 1985 Printed in GreatBritin.

Caplexes

of Amine Cations with

Lasalocid A. a Ulcrobial IomplWe Rafaelita C.R. Cueco and Grover W. Everett* Department of Chemistry. Laurence,

of Kansas

University

Kansas

66045

(Received in USA 26 April 1985)

- Complexes

Abstract prepared diverse

steric

solvents

of

molecular

weight

Lasalocid

as chloroform

A-1 have

of organic canplexes

dissolve

and are characterized NMR data

and 13C nmr spectroscopy.

that

a carboxylic

di-,

lonophore

and trivalent

metal

solvent

across

natural

by bind

data show

by microorganisms,

produced

cations

in

the cations

weight -via hydrogen bonds to 03, 06, and OB. Molecular complexes are appreciably dissociated in chloroform solution.

A (I)‘, mono-,

with

readily

in this

indicate

been

substituents

A anion

none of these

transporting

such

CR-NH;l[lasalocid

a series

The crystalline

properties.

low polarity data

the stoichiometry

where R represents

and electronic

the lasalocid that

having

and characterized,

is

capable

of

qembranes.2-4

and artificial

I Crystallographic abbreviated

studies5-9

LAS, reveal

that

each of

which has a cyclic

oxygens

lie

on the inside

04,

06,

07’

05’

oxygen

of

of the lasalocid

the cations

are sandwiched

in all

but one case,

conformation of

stabilized

the

cation

cation

in all

in only

by intramolecular

leaving

the complex,

and OB bind

is bound to the

the Na+, Ag+, and Ba2+ complexes

a hydrophobic

six

of

hydrogen

outer

The five

structures.

and in no case

is

hereafter

0’

Most of

bonds.

surface.

the published

two structures,

A anion,

by two LAS ligands, the

oxygen.3

A carboxylate

involved

in cation

binding. In the solution differs

Prom that

laboratory

phase

in which

determined

remaining

having

attached

the general

Mn2+, Cd3’,

their

reported

lsolatfon

result

of

crystallographic that

the

amine

conformation CWIplSXeS

cation

of

of metal

the

is

several of

binds

two ligands

ability

well

chiral

crystallization the LAS-cation

used

Another solution

“take

are

involving

intramolecular

via

04.

06’

crystalline

and characterized

to bind and transport and the existence

and 07

complexes for

established.2-4*‘2-‘4 of

crystalline

ones for of complex

In 1:'

amine cations.

of 1:l

complexes

1977,

M - Ca2+,

Host of the

in solution

Westley

et --

LAS-amine complexes.

which resolution

of

one diastereomer

the racemic of

the

and

a1.15

first

A number of amine occurred

complex.

An x-ray

of R-(*I-1-amino-1-(4-brcmophenyllethane

showed The overall

LAS -via hydrogen bonds Prom -NH3+ to 03’ 06’ and Og’ in this complex was Pound to be the same as that

LAS backbone

cations.

binding

study”

binding

studies,

clearly Prom this

cation

recent a dynamic,

turns”

In both these

for

ligation paper”

or half-integer.

amines,

and characterlzatlon

study15

charge.

in chloroform

at 03 and OB.

its

biogenic

preferential

LAS oxygens

cation

of

in a recent

Hn+(LASjn . X CHC13 were prepared

known for

amines were used including as the

in which at least

in membrane transport

the

that

where the pattern

are summarized

the specific

Here X 1s an integer

A is also

instances

These

and the

to the cation

work has involved

role

that

polarity

stolchianetry

and La3+.

Lasalocid prevlous

a number of state.

of LAS indicates

donor exchange occurs

while

are

we demonstrate

by both the solvent

Ca2+ and La 3+ complexes ligand

there

Pound in the solid

However,

unlike

the dlmeric

monomeric. 4437

Na+ and Ag’

complexes,

in

the amine complex

LAS is

4438

R. C. R.

of our work concerned

As an extension

cations in the solution

and G. W. EVERETT

GUECO

the

with

ligating

phase, it seemed appropriate

properties

to attempt

of LAS toward inorganic

to establish

how the lasalocid

anion binds organic amine cations in the solution phase. Thus we have prepared and characterized a series of complexes varied

of LAS having

systematically

over

the general

stoichiometry

a range of organic

(R-NHS)(LASl. where the R-group

substituents

varying

in steric

properties

is and

functional groups. RESULTS AND DISCDSSICU The procedure used for preparing LAS complexes described in this paper and in previous reports from this laboratory'"~" elemental

analyses

is designed

are consistent

to ensure

saturation

of the ionophore.

with the 1:l stoichiometry

(cationl(LAS).

In all

stoichianetric amount of water is associated with the complex. Results of elemental melting points of the complexes are given in Table I.

Effective molecular

cases,

In some cases a analyses and

weights in chloroform

solution are shown in Table II. The complexes are very soluble in organic solvents of low polarity such as chloroform and qethylene chloride and have moderate solubilities

in cyclohexane and carbon

tetrachloride.

Table

s

rn4+ %O

%O

c8p3+ + CZ”5-m3 pC4H9-NH,+

+ 'b"S-NH) lad-nr mahe

CC’)

of

(Catiml”+)w3), * 8 ComplaM

w.

zc found

2

*.

found

cakd. --

E

found

170-172(d)

67.18

66.72

9.45

9.25

2.30

1.97

187-189

66.64

66.50

9.59

9.84

2.22

2.19

202-204

68.00

67.61

9.67

9.60

2.20

2.15

196-198

68.74

68.86

9.87

10.10

2.11

2.07

158-160

69.33

69.05

9.02

9.10

2.02

1.95

201-203

71.22

71.00

9.64

9.56

1.89

1.84

70.85

70.99

9.20

9.48

1.97

1.80

112

69.97

70.17

9.23

9.50

1.94

1.70

158-159

66.17

66.00

9.25

9.50

1.98

1.68

67.80

67.48

8.81

9.00

1.88

1.81

69.51

69.40

9.92

10.01

2.03

1.82

l-

*

IJ

R-(+)a--thy1 bauylanina*H+ 4H20

characrsriz~timl

1.

H.P.

CatlO”

196-196 (lit.15 198-199)

w-;~~:hYY

sthyl-t-alaninate . II+

216-218 wt.‘5 220) 189-191

w

C&Xi.

rarnd

613

591

1

608

620

3 I( 6

636 664

622

142

126

8

712

100

10

744

132

Y&As

652

Complexes of amine cations with lasakid

Organic

amlnes with

diverse

ability

primary

but we were unable

amines,

eplnephrine amlnes

by the usual

having

complexes 4Table

II).

both

dlamlne,

or

complexes hydrogen

ccmp1e.l

-5

enantlomers

similar

2 and s

in

which

of

the chlral

assessed the

% -_.Y

- C4

cg

3-L

L

&_

121.5

N.U.5

176.5

118.1

160.8

123.0

131.3

119.9

m4sb

175.4

116.0

161.3

123.2

131.7

119.7

1

175.9

116.2

161.5

123.1

131.9

119.9

143.9

2

176.1

116.5

161.7

123.3

131.9

119.9

144.1

70.5

3

175.9

116.1

162.0

123.4

131.9

119.9

144.3

70.4

4

175.1

116.2

161.9

123.4

131.8

119.8

144.4

70.5

5

175.9

115.4

161.9

123.6

132.5

120.2

144.5

70.5

6

175.7

116.4

162.0

123.4

131.8

119.7

144.5

7

175.9

116.0

162.3

123.6

132.2

120.1

a

175.8

116.0

162.2

123.5

132.1

9

175.9

116.1

162.1

123.6

10

176.2

115.8

161.4

11

176.0

116.2

162.1

products

absorbances 1020(w);

occur

1048(s),

weight

groups

with 1:l

determinations were easily III).

one at each end.

’ 3C nmr data)

and/or

c1)

capable

%a ---

of

The No are

forming

?9

c22

86.4

70.9

73.2

82.7

87.2

68.3

71.0

04.7

87.7

69.7

71.6

56.0

a2.a

87.2

70.0

71.5

218.2

56.2

83.1

87.6

69.6

71.2

218.3

56.4

83.0

87.7

70.1

71.0

218.2

56.3

83.2

81.2

70.0

70.9

217.8

51.2

83.5

87.7

70.4

71.5

56.3

83.2

87.3

70.1

70.7

56.5

83.1

87.7

70.3

71.1

56.6

81.0

87.5

68.9

71.0

210.7

56.7

83.1

87.7

70.1

71.2

48.6

218.0

56.2

03.4

87.9

70.1

71.5

49.2

21a.2

56.5

83.1

87.7

70.3

71.1

214.6

55.3

84.1

143.3

70.4

48.6

218.5

55.b

143.7

70.5

48.2

216.2

56.4

70.4

49.0

217.3

49.0 49.2 48.9 49.2

70.7

48.9

217.8

144.6

70.6

49.3

218.4

119.9

144.5

70.4

49.5

219.2

132.2

120.0

144.5

70.7

49.4

123.6

132.4

120.3

144.8

70.8

123.5

132.0

120.0

144.4

70.5

110.3(s),

144.3

complex

in order

The spectra

at the following 1048(s);

_%_

49.1

of NaLAS and of in 2.

L

72.)

CH3CH2NH2, were compared

reaction

weight

Cl3 and C,9 (Table

has functional

135.2

spectra

even

of monomeric.

-two LAS anions,

all

amine R-(-j-

a-methylbenxylamlne for

assess

with

bonds.

124.4

Infrared

except

by molecular

161.8

amlnes,

of molecular

to

obtained

The existence

binds

cation

the secondary

were readily

amine,

shifts

113.4Ill.3

“IA.9

of LAS with

by the results

apparently (as

obtained

complexes

13C nmr chemical

structures

in order

were readily

and l-adamantyl.

demonstrated

1,12-diaminododecane,

stoichiometrles for

as t-butyl

is

were chosen

complexes

a complex

Stolchlometrlc

such

4439

properties

Crystalline

to isolate

procedure.

of

and electronic

lonophore.

solution

Complexes

add1 tlonal

the

R-groups

These have very

long-chain found

large

in chloroform

prepared. unusual

of

steric

the coordinating

A

are

formed frax test

for

virtually

frequencies 1103(s);

1, to

(in

the cation

the

identical. cd’)

1248(w),

for 1254(w);

of one of the more reactive

occurrence

of

In the

Schlff

base

1000-2000

cm-’

2 and NaLAS. resPectlveIY: 1281(s),

1275(a);

1321(s),

or amide region, 1022(w), 1321(s);

4440

R. C. R. Gusto and G. W. EVERETT

1385(vs),

1383(vs);

Thus there

is

1429(vs),

no evidence

Binding ---Sites (4-br~~henyl)athane also

bind

of

complexes

the complexes

shifts

of

Spectra

III.

of

Chemical

III.

signals

It generally

closer

complexes

of

solution

binding

cation

Prom Table of

cation-bound

shifts

for

implies

near

C,2s

C2, C3, Cll,

Clg,

chemical

diFPerences

shift

Sfmilarly, the 05’ diPPerently with 06. relatively

small

13C nmr data

indicate

Chemical

very

for

Sites

solution

COmpariBOn. are

that

LAS

StrUctUres

in

POr Na+ in the

at Lou temperatures

which Strongly at 0,.

indicates

similar

T%+

Oqr and 07.

1, and it might

and induce

Were

in Table

amine Complexes

Similar

binding

coupling.

shifts

for

This

The ionic

be expected,

conformations

difference

C, 5 and Cl 8, ” NH: binds

hydrogen

2

in the

the observed ring

particular

interest,

shifts

assumed that

for

this

manner as its

to

cationslO, of 0.2-1.4

test could

and fc)

unlike

C.,5 implies

(b)

is

at 03,

08,

the

bromlnated

nmr spectrum whether

the unexplained

Tt+

LAS at 03 Larger

and NHI(+ in

large

large

ions

and probably are rather

diPference

is

is the only

cation

shift

view

diPPerenoea

differences

It

interact

OP (a)

cannot

the

in TP-C in

bound at 06.10n2’.

06.

g).

capable

differences

is

similar

at Cl3 for

electronic

cation

spin-

Overall,

be ascertained

are attributed

analog

in the

binds

solid

of

to

the

the

effects

of 1 is

Rf+)-1-amino-l-(4state.”

complexes.

If

solution

nmr data

be

bonds.

Canplex

and 08 in the solid

the other

only

might

to steric!

LAS in chloroform

state,

differ

Pour hydrogen

of the R-group.

related

from those

ammonium cation

and in general Some differences

of forming

influences

closely

deviations

imply

it

is

in the same

binding

at 03,

Complexes. of

1C2H5NH3)(LAS), 1,

solvent

be discerned.

ppm were observed

in chemical binds

T%+, NH&+ is not bound to

that

the unexpectedly

except

the possible

resonance.)

questionable

by paramagnetlc

carbons

differences

by the solvent

which has been shown to bind LAS at 03, 06,

the amine Cation

The carbon-13 (DMF) solution

at C,8,

and other

1 show no unusual

(4-phenyl)

for

all

the NH4+ cation

that,

implication

chemical

the R-(+I-a-methylbenzyl

061 and 08 for $&

Tt+,

1s obscured

amine complexes

currents, since

cation

The smaller

like

for

manner with

bond.

ainoe

the R-group,

braaophenyllethane

latter

of NH4LAS (largest

-2-l-*1 araaatic

that,

dfPPerence

this

that

by 0.5 ppm or less LAS in a similar

(05 and 06).

of Cl5 and Cl8 induced

the NH{ complex,

bind

Por Cl2 and C,3 suggest

among the other

Prom those

differ

ions

and C,5

shift

Among canplexes

changes

the

of Tf.+ binding

sites

(The C23 signal

shift

between rates

metal

given

for

signals

listed

of HLAS, indicating

have the

not

of the nmr data of the amine complexes.

and C22 indicate

However,

relaxatlon

Chemical

probably

Purpose. in Table

The latter

for

than to those

no evidence

these

C13,

chemical

whether NH; Porms a fourth

of

observed

A and 1.66 A, respectively2’

that

observed

chemical

coup1 ing constants

expected

shifts

203*205T%-‘3C

is

of the T%+ and NH4+ complexes

at 01, 04, or 07.

slightly

1).

this

are given

Of NaLAS except

but are

OP TLLAS In chloroform

interpretation

and 08 but not

the

that

Fig.

known regarding

due to

(1.54

(see

procedures

cations

seek the same LAS binding

This

0P oxygens Par Ct.

lattice

metal

There

to

NatAS, and T$LAS are also

chemical

definitely

splitting,

point

C12, C13, and C15. exception

similar

for

13C

oP LAS

ionophore.

Chemical

shifts

very

decoupling

the ‘3C nmr spectrum

signal

they would

are

phase,

nmr spectra

resolved assignments 7.16-18

firm

the Na* and T11* complexes is

Proton

insufficiently

having

acid),

and monovalent

Houever,

a starting that

(80 MHz) are

111 that

of Tt* and NH; are similar

priori

of R(+l-l-amino-l-

in the solution

were examined.

off-resonance

nothing

of

solution

complexes

at OS, OS, 06, and 08.l’

provides radii

1705(s).

in Solution.

from the amine substltuent

amine cations

shows a pattern

bonding

routine

those

to

phase,

1707(s).

the cation

the amine-LAS interaction

13C signals

Por HLAS(lasalocid seen

Virtually

solution.

1597fvs);

has shown that

arising

of

shifts

is readily

of

spectrometer

amine

with the aid

hydrogen

in chloroform

read1 ly-observed

oP the

superposition assigned

used for the nature

the Bruker up-80

on

Chemical

1593(va),

between the amine and LAS.

LAS -via hydrogen bonds CO 03* 06, and 08.‘= Other amine Cations maY manner in the solid state, but as pointed out in the Introduction. tha same

to establish

of

1458(vs);

Crystallography

Amine Cations.

are not necessarily

1n an effort nmr spectra

1456(vs),

bond formation

binds

LAS in this

LAS oxygens

1429(s);

Por covalent

polarity On going

for

was also

ePfects fran

most carbons

chloroform oP 2.

examined in N,N-dimethylformamfde

on ligation,

such

as those

to DffF solutions,

Similar

changes

observed chemical

are observed

also

for shift uith

Complexes of amine cations with lasalocid A

7

13

15 16

6

120

160

4441

80

40

&

20-l4Hz carbon-l 3 nmr spectrum ,&~,,cO~GYg klm (tlhe in chloroform SolutlOn. k&k?ylk!ine~H)kA.S). adamantyl grou are assigned as follows: Al, Cl(52.1 PPm); A c2 + C8 + C9 (41.1 ppm); B 3, C3 + C5 + C7 (29.2 PP~); Aq, CQ + hj + Cl0 ( 3’5.8 PPm).

and do not necessarily

NaLAS”

of 2.3 ppm found and x

indicate

found for

for

Summary.

the

08 does

not bind

Crystalline,

1:l

changes (the

in ligation.

However.

corresponding

change

the amine In the more polar

remain

closely

complexes

prepared.

than to Porm hydrogen ions

fran

the chemical is only

solvent.

A

shift

change

0.6 ppm for

NaLAS)

Similar

SltUatiOn

was

the Un2+ cation”.

primary amines are readily other

result

C22 of 3 is exceptional

bonds.

associated.

of

IR spectra Moleoular Carbon-13

the lasalocid show that weight

A anion

data demonstrate

nmr data

A anion are involved ‘a1 and probably 06 of the lasalocld been found for a related complex in the solid state.

with

cations

the amine3 do not react in chloroform

that

of a

Variety

in chloroform

solution

in hydrogen bonding

of

with lasalocid indicate

to the cations

A

solution that

03,

as has

4442

R. C. R. Gueco and G.

W.

EVEXETT

Materials. NqI,ASwas purchased Prom Aldrich Chemical Company and used wlthoyt,,fur\h;; puriPl?XlZon 8l C nmr chemicalshifts were in good agreementwith reportedvalues, @ signals attribut%e to impuritiescould be detected. Some of the amine8 used are available as their hydrochloridesalts and, with the exceptionof Anlline*HClwas recrystallizedseveral times the exceptionof Rin ethyl ether. The ether then dried in vacua. ution of the amine Pono~ -The procedureused to prepare LAS complexesof amine cations ~:;Io~~~E~~a~~~~~t~d3~ev~ously for p reparatlon of LAS complexes of metal . ml aqueousso ut on containing10 mm01 of the amine hydrochloride is divided into three lo-ml portions. Each portion,in turn, la stirred vi orcusly for 2-3 hr with 25 ml of a chloroformor meth lene chloridesolution containing1 mm01 NaLf S. The non-aqueous layer is then washed several % imea with water and dried over molecular sieves. Subsequentfiltrationfollowed by removal of the solvent -in vacua affordsa crystallineproduct. Instrumentation. Carbon-13 nmr spectra were obtained on a Bruker WP-80 FT spectrometer ac Cu m Spectra were run at the ambient probe temperature of 39OC using 8~ data lemental inal sea were carried out on a Hewlett Packard Model 1858 C, H, N analyzer ocated in the Departmen f.of Medicinal Chemistry. Repeatedanalyses of the same instrumentspanneda ran e of 0.51 for C and 0.4sfor H and N. Nltro en analyadS-%lB Molecular weight determfnations were made in chloroformsolution a& 37°C using a Hewlettl&&% Model 302 vapor reaaure oamometer. The oamometerwas calibratedusing recrystallizedbenzil, and solutions were Pn the concentration range OP 1 to 10 mmolar. Infrared s ectra were run on KBr elleta using an IBM InstrumentsIR 32 FT apectrophotometer. All melting poPnta were measuredon a fhomas Hoover capillarymelting point apparatusand are uncorrected.

1.

The numberingscheme used here is that roposed earlier: Weatley. J.W.J. Antibiot.1976, 29. 584. Oxygen numbers are shown in parenPheses.

2.

Weatley. J.W. "Pal ether Antibiotics: Naturally OccurringAcid Icnophorea";Vol. I and II; Marcel Dekker:Base 1, 1982. Ovchinnikov,Y.A. in "Frontiersin Bioor anic Chemistryand,y7\ecularBiology";Ovchinnikov, Y.A.and Kolosov, M.N.,Eda. Chapter 8: &sevier:Amsterdam, .

3. 4.

Poonia, N.S.:Bajaj, A.V. Chem. Rev. 1979, 79, 389.

5.

Smith, G.D.;Daux, W.L.;Fortier. S. J. Am. Chem. Sot. 1978, 100. 6725.

6.

Chiang, C.C.;Paul, I.C.Science (Washington,D.C.)1977, 196, 1441.

7.

Schmidt, P.G.;Wang, A.H.-J.;Paul, I.C.J. Am. Chem. Sot. 1974, 96, 6189. Maier, C.A.:Paul, I.C.J. Chem. Sot. Chem. Commun. 1971, 181.

a. 9. 10.

Johnson. S.H.;Herrin, J.; Liu. S.J.:Paul, I.C.J. Am. Chem. Sot. 1970, 92, 4428. Hanna, D.A.;Yeh, C; Shaw, J.; Everett, C.W.Biochem. 1983, 22, 5619.

11. Everett, C.W.;Parker, S.B.;Wllllama, R.J.P.Biochem. 1983, 22, 6149. 12.

Melnik E I . Lindenbaum. S.; Sternaon. L.A.;Ovchinnlkov, ~::;~:.&~:i;~, 684. 2.33:

Y.A.

Bicchlm. et

13. ~:~",~:~.",~F~a1MsBS:11i~~~,EjIjj.Sternson. L.A.; Lindanbaum. S; Ovchinnikov, Y.A. Biochim. et 14. Kinael Pharmac&%

Melnik E.1 * Lindenbaum, S.; Sternson, L.A.;Ovchinnikov, Y.A. Internat. J. 1982, 13. 97:'

15. Weatley, J.W.;Evans, R.H.,Jr.: Blount, J.F.J. Am. Chem. Sot. 1977, 99, 6057. 16. Seto. H.; Westley, J.W.;Pitcher, R.G.J. Antlbiot. 1978, 31. 289. 17. Anteunis, M.J.O.Bioorg. Chem.w,

5, 327.

18. Patel, D.J.:Shen. C. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1976, 73, 1786, 4277. 19. Lallemand, J.-Y.:Michon, V.J.Chem.Rea.. miniprint 1978, 2081. 20. Cotton, F.A.;Wilkinson,G. "AdvancedInorganicChemistry";4th Ed.: John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1980. 21. Lallemand, J.-Y.;Rao, R.; Prange, T. Nouv. J. Chlm. 1980, 4, 315.