Tetrahedron Letters~0.46,pp. 5743-5750, 1966. PeqramonPressLtd. Printedin GreatBritain.
COl?STITUTION OF PROCERAGENIN A - A TRITERPRNOID SAPOGERI19FROM ALBIZZIA PROCERA BRNTH* Sujata Department
Roy and Aelt
Boy
of Chemistry, Botanical of India, Calcutta.
Survey
(Received 8 September1966) The isolation [&X26D
of proceragenin
13” (CHC13); ‘v’ in cm-’
A (Ia)
(KBr)
~C30H4604 (OH);
: 3550
membered laotone); 1360, 1380 (m-dlmethyl). 76.59;
Ii, 9.78;
found:
triterpenoid
aapogenln,
was reported
in a preliminary
with
its
structure
The ethanollc
from the seeds
extract
of the defatted
ethanolic
hydrochloric
and subsequent afforded
Anal. talc. ; H, 9.741,
a
nrocera
This
for
Benth
paper deals
elucidation.
a good amount of saponin,
sapogenin
1765 (a flve-
of Albiaeia
communicationl.
furnished
The acid
C, 76.34
m.p.294-296°r
acid
fraction
proceragenin
of A.
which on hydrolysis
gave acid
and neutral
on treatment
chromatographla
seeds
resolution
mooera
with
sapogenine.
with ethereal
diaeomethane
over acid-washed
A ae one of the constituents.
alumina
Roceragenin
l A part of the work was carried out at the Department of Chemistry, Bose Institute, Calcutta-g, India and was supported in part by the Ministry of Education, Government of India. The authors desire to express their sincere thanks to Dr. A.K.Barua, Reader In Chemistry, Bose Institute, Calcutta and to Rev. Dr. H. Santapau, Director, Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta for their keen interest and encouragement.
5743
A
No.46
5741
naa alao obtained from neutral sapogenin fraction on column chromatographyover acid-washedalumina. ProcerageninA, on hydrolysis with alcoholiccaustic potash, yielded an acid, which on treatmentwith diasomethaneor on standing with alcoholic hydrochloricacid gave back procerageninA.
This is perhaps
the reason why procerageninA is encounteredfrom both the acid and neutral sapogeninfractions during isolation. ProcerageninA (Ia), when treated with pyridine and acetic anhydride at O", furnished a mixture of diacetate (Ic) ~C34H5006, m.p. 246-248O,,@JE6- 38O (CSC13);‘3 in cm-l (KBr) : 1750 (a five-memberedlactone) ;
1725, 1240 (acetate carbonyl)] and
monoacetate (Ib) rCJ2Hq805, m.p. 301-304“,fi@'-
10' (CHC13);
'; in cm-' (KBr): 3600 (OH) ; 1765 (a five-memberedlactone) ; 1720, 1240 (acetatecarbonyl)J.
Acetylationof Ia or of Ib on
steam-bathfurnished only Ic. Ib on oxidationwith chromium trioxide-aceticacid at room temperatureafforded a neutral keto monoacetate. rc32~4605, m.p. 296-302O (decomp.);‘; in cm-1 (KBr): 1765 (a five-memberedlactone);1720, 1240 (acetatecarbonyl)_.7 Thus all the four oxygen atoms in procerageninA are accounted for as forming part of two hydroxyl groups and one la&one ring. The ethylenic linkage in Ia, indicatedby tetranitromethane colour, is very hindered. Ic did neither react with perbensoic 3,4,5,6,7. acid' nor did it react with selenium dioxide Lithium aluminiumhydride reduction of Ia furnished a tetrol (1Ia) f-C30H5004, m.p.306-310°,pJz5+
18.11° (pyridine);
No.46
3 in
5745
cm-' (KBr): 3400 (OH)J
which on acetylation by pyridiae and
acetic anhydride on steam-bath gave a triacetate (IIb) zC36H,3607, m.p. 197-1990, &f-+$8 + 43.2* (CHC13); 5 in cm-l (KBr): 3500 (OH); 1720, 1240 (acetate carbonyl)].
This clearly indicated that one
of the newly formed hydroxyl groups in the tetrol Is highly hindered and cannot be acetylated under the above condition.
The
tetrol triacetate (IIb) consumed one mole of perbenzoic acid at a rate*typical
of the triterpenes of the f-amyrin group having
a double bond at 12:13 position.
The unusually hindered nature
of the ethylenlc linkage in proceragenin A must be then due to the shielding effect of the lactone ring5.
The tetrol triacetate
on oxidation with chromium trioxlde-acetic acid at room temperature furnished a monoketotriacetate (11~) rC36H,3407, m.p. 226-228“. 13.88O (CHC13); 'v in cm-' (KBr) : 1720, 1240 (acetate
@]z3+
carbonyl)J
which on reduction with lithium aluminlum hydride
furnished the tetrol (IIa). bond of the dor
Evidence for the typical 12:13 double
p-amyrin nuc,leuswas obtained by oxidation of
either IIb or IIc with chromium trioxide - acetic acid on steambath to yield an m.p. 26%267O, ( 4.p
A,,
d,p
-unsaturated ketone (IId) zC36H5208,
243 m~~(logc
-unsaturated ketone)J.
4.1); 7 in cm-l (KBr): 1665
The U.V. absorption maximum Is
slightly at a lower wave length than is usually obeerved for 11-keto
Al2 -triterpenes of the
P-amyrin series*.
Lithium
aluminium hydride reduction and subsequent acid treatment of the Gl
-unsaturated ketone (IId) furnished a diene showing triple
ultraviolet absorption maxima at 243, 251, 261 IUJA characteristic
o*
A11:12,
13:18
the basis
-dienee
belonging
bond at the 12:13
the absence
of
acid
diketone
hydroxyl
of this groups
A-diketone
diketone
(Ie)
group thus
was not an 6-
clearly
A
a double
308-312°
or
at C2.
/3 -diketone
eXtinctiOll
amount of dioephenol
of an
in the above
chloride teat’
ketone)J.
both the
system
teat.
for
3-keto
hydroxyl
A and eliminating
group
the poaaibllity
ae the oxidation free
ring
The abeeoce
ferric
the second
-1 5 in cm
product
hydroxyl
group
to Cl or C2.
which gave violet
and ehowed absorption
a colourleas
that
of one secondary
Moreover,
p-diketone,
which showed
(deoomp.);
in nature.
Zimmermann oolour
in prooerageain
acid
of Ia with chromium
demonstrated
&or
gave poeitive
Id and Ie on heating
formation
having
furniahed
was shown by negative
not be attached
mOlecUhr
On
proceragenin
1710 (six-membered
In Ia are secondary
any subatitutlon
product
la&one);
ahowing the presence
at C3 position
could
cC30H4204 , m.p.
diketone
product
group,
Oxidation
at room temperature
or an enolieable
oxidation
of
(Ie)
system.
1770 (five-membered
Formation
g-amyrln
that
A did not consume any periodic
any o(-glycol
trloxide-acetic
of compounde.
is concluded
it
to the
type
poeition.
Proceragenin
(KBr):
g-amyrln
of above observations,
ie a triterpene
neutral
from
with alkali colour
furnished
with alcoholic
maximum at 281 UIJA (loge value
auggeated
that
was formed during
of the above diosphenol
only
a pale ferrio 3.5).
chloride But low
a very amall
eaponification.
can only
yellow
be explained
The if
the
The
*.. a!?@ w
coon
A
Ho
..*
I4
W
“OH
i
OH
NO.16
5748
relative ring
poeition
of one of the hydroxyl
in Ia be a8 shown in (i) .
should the
have the moiety
d-ketol
in alkaline
diosphenol
the tetrol
the moiety
(IIa)
which has previously (IIa)
furnished
a yellow
at 281 my
be deeignated
chloride
triterpene bond.
cannot
(secondary) y.-lactone
eumareeinolic Cl5 (cf.
groups
highly
group
hindered.
The aoid
which gave a violet
colour
maximum
hydroxyl acid’.‘)
eiareeinolic
and it
(excluding series
has already (i).
A
to be
the laotone
ring)
with a 12:15
double
been located The moiety
dlketoproceragenin
was neither
groups
’
show proceragenin
in the moiety
A because
to Zimmermann test
clearly
of the oleaoaoe
and the other
be in ring
of the free
group may
ae Z-hydroxyl
and showed abaorption
pentacyclic
One of the hydroxyl
C5 position
hydroxyl
must have
t 4 .O) .
The above observations a dihydroxy
acid
with chromium trioxlde-acetic
amorphous product
ferric
(log
by the fact
Thus the tetrol
be
the
(iv). strengthened
reagent.
been shown to
on oxidation
with alcoholic
in low yield,
The newly formed secondary
(v).
to aerial
did consume one mole of periodic to this
A
would furnish
susceptible
is further
the sake of convenience
tetrol
being
which should have thti moiety
whereae Ia was inert
for
Thus the diketoproceragenin
medium, may furnish,
The above conclusion that
and the lactone
which on saponification
The latter
(iii).
oxidation
(ii)
groups
A (Ie)
at (i)
responded
an CLor fl diketone.
of Ia can be located
None
at Cg (cf.
(eee paper on dumortierigenin5) and C 15 acidl’ and tomentoeio acid12) as the
No.46
3719
hydroxyl
groups
(whether
hindered
and cannot
on steam-bath.
d or p ) at these
be acetylated
Iecessarily
not be acetylated
steam-bath,
must be aituated
the potential
be in 1:5
diaxial
spontaneous
for
the former
(I)
the oleanane
carboxyl
for rather
has been reported
from nature
or any oxygen function
oleanolic requires
acid
formation
group attached
group is axial
the potential
nature
hydroxyl
of the tetrol axial
hindered
15-keto
(IIa)
reduction group.
C3-OH of proceragenin The low molecular
rotation
to those
uptil
in which there
is a
to C8. .of the
15 lactone
is further
aluminium-hydride)
alcohole
The
by the (11~)
by the
of the highly
(at O”) of the
a normal equatorial (+ 9.9’)
formation
( P).
substantiated
The ease of acetylation
of 3 P-oriented
of
now no
to Cl7 in triterpenes
difference
the
ground aa
in a triterpene
from monoketo triacetate
A suggests
for
two atruotures,
group at Cl5 to be axial
(Lithium
must
evidences
on biogenetic
/3 and the 28 _
of the Cl5 hydroxyl
expected
comparable
attached
A (Ia)
structural
In fact,
than at C8.
on
C6, Cl5 and Clq.
Of these
function
(IIa)
anhydride
With these
A as I and III.
a carboxyl
anhydride
group to account
(IV).
to be more probable
site
The carboxyl
axial
group of proceraganin
to deduce the permissible
appears
series
and acetic
with the ‘Z’-OH
proceragenin
Cl7 is the usual
and acetic
in any of the positions
of the acid
is possible
expressions
triterpene
position
are highly
group in the tetrol
by pyridine
carboxyl
lactonisation
at hand it
by pyridine
the Z-hydroxyl
which could
Further
positions
( p)
orientation.
of Ia an? Ib is and their
acetates.
5750
No.46
The fact that the Cl6 hydroxyl group in procerageninA reeisted acetylatiooat O" euggests its axial (4) configuration. Further the high negative Al value (- 159.32')of Cl6 hydroxgl group of procerageninA also calls for ita sxial configuration(cf. methyl echinocystateand genin A). The above discussionsshow procerageninA to be 28 -
15 la&one
of 15p, 16C-dihydroxy oleanolicacid (IV). IV is a new triterpene acid and is one of the constituentsof the acid sapogeninfraotion of A.
mocerf.
Though procerageninA is a facile lactonisationproduct
of IV, it is difficultto prove that it is not at all occurringin nature.
References : 1. S.Roy an? A.Roy, Experientia,(communicated). 2. L.Ruzicka,H.Silbermannand M.Furtner,Helv.Chim.Acta, 2, 482 (1932). 3. L.Ruzicka,G.Muller and H.Sohellenberg,Helv.Chim.Acta, 2, 767 (1939). 4. D.H.R.Bartonand C.J.W.Brooks,J.C.S., 257 (1951). 5. C.Djerassi,C.H;Robinsonand D.B.Thomas,J.A.C.S., 2, 5685 (1956). 6. G.Cainelli,A.Melera,D.Arigoni and O.Jeger, Belv.Chim.Acta,2, 2390 (1957). 7. S.K.Chakrabortiand A.K.Barua,Experientia,g, 8.
C.R.Woller,J.A.C.S.,_, 66
66 (1962).
1269 (1944).
9. D.H.R.Bartonand P.D.Mayo,J.C.S., 887 (1954). 10. L.Ruzicka,O.Jeger, A.Grob and H.Hosll, Helv.Chim.Acta, 3, 2283 (1943). 11.
L.Ruzicka,A.Grob, R.Egli and O.Jeger, Helv.Chlm.Acta, 26, 1218 (1943).
12. L.R.C.Row and G.S.R.S.Rao,TetrahedronLetters, 10.27, 12 (1960).
),