Accepted Manuscript Creation of an arterialized cephalic vein as autologous bypass for below-kneereconstruction in critical limb ischemia Thermann F PII:
S0890-5096(18)30193-6
DOI:
10.1016/j.avsg.2017.12.019
Reference:
AVSG 3748
To appear in:
Annals of Vascular Surgery
Received Date: 26 November 2017 Revised Date:
11 December 2017
Accepted Date: 26 December 2017
Please cite this article as: F T, Creation of an arterialized cephalic vein as autologous bypass for below-knee-reconstruction in critical limb ischemia, Annals of Vascular Surgery (2018), doi: 10.1016/ j.avsg.2017.12.019. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Creation of an arterialized cephalic vein as autologous bypass for below-knee-reconstruction
2
in critical limb ischemia
3
Thermann F
5
Carl-von-Basedow-Hospital Merseburg
7
Teaching Hospital of the University Halle-Wittenberg
8
Weiße Mauer 52
9
06217 Merseburg
M AN U
10
SC
6
RI PT
4
Germany
11
correspondent author:
13
Thermann Florian, MD
14
Head of department of Vascular surgery, Carl-von-Basedow-Hospital Merseburg
15
Weiße Mauer 52
16
06217 Merseburg
17
Germany
18
phone: +49-3461-273101
19
fax:
AC C
EP
TE D
12
+49-3461-273102
20 21 22
conflict of interests: none
23
The patients consented to publishing this report.
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract
26
Two cases of below- knee-bypasses using an arterialized cephalic vein are presented. Both
27
patients had critical ischemia but no greater or lesser saphenous veins were useable.
28
According to ultrasound, the cephalic veins were thin but regularly positioned. Four weeks
29
after wrist fistula was created, ultrasound showed adequate maturation and the bypass
30
operations were performed. Both patients had uneventful courses and were discharged
31
after a few days with patent bypasses since then (35 and 18 months). As this report shows,
32
creation of a fistula can be a useful option to gain autologous bypass material in case of
33
critical limb ischemia.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
25
34
35
39
40
41 42
43
44
45
EP
38
AC C
37
TE D
36
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Introduction
47
Among vascular surgeons there is general consensus on the fact that in cases of below-knee
48
bypass reconstructions autologous material is preferred to grafts for reasons of better
49
patency and lower infection rates [1]. However, autologous material is rarely available;
50
either because the greater saphenous vein (GSV) has already been used for other
51
reconstructive operations or it was removed due to varicosis or its diameter is not sufficient
52
for the use of a bypass; similarly, the lesser saphenous vein (LSV) may be either not long
53
enough or of insufficient caliber. The deep femoral vein can be used also, but firstly the
54
preparing is much more invasive and secondly its length is not sufficient for a below-knee-
55
reconstruction. As another alternative the use of the cephalic vein has been described [2-4];
56
however, often it is a vein of small caliber (lower arm) and with a more vulnerable wall
57
compared to the veins of the leg. Furthermore its length is sometimes not sufficient for a
58
below-knee-reconstruction [4].
59
The use of a matured fistula vein as alternative bypass option has been described before [5;
60
6] but has not actually played a role in autologous bypass creation since. In our own vascular
61
center we have performed two bypass operations using a fistula vein of the arm. The aim of
62
this report is to give an idea in which situations fistula bypasses might be a useful option in
63
critical ischemia in order to widen the options for creating an autologous bypass.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
64
RI PT
46
65
Surgical procedure
66
For the bypass operations we used two teams. Accordingly, in both patients we could
67
harvest the fistula vein and open the situs at the leg at the same time. After tunneling and
68
pulling through the vein in a reversed manner, anastomoses were created simultaneously.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 69
Afterwards angiography was performed. Both patients were put on coumarins as we do in
70
every patient undergoing below-knee-bypass.
71
Patient one
73
An 80 years old patient who was in good health had pain at rest. Further diseases:
74
Hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage III. Angiography revealed obliteration of the
75
tibiofibular trunc. The right GSV had been used for cardiac surgery; the GSV of the left leg
76
was, as well as both LSV, of insufficient caliber (<0.2cm; preoperative ultrasound).
77
Interestingly, the patient had a wrist fistula of the left arm created 10 years previously due
78
to anticipated need for hemodialysis, which subsequently had not been necessary. The
79
fistula vein was well matured along the lower and upper arm (0.40 – 0.45 cm) which gave us
80
the idea of using it as a bypass vein (figure 1-3).
81
Postoperatively, there was a regular course of events. The renal parameters were stable
82
without any deterioration. The patient was discharged on post-operation-day (POD) twelve.
83
The bypass has remained patent since then (35 months post-op).
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
72
AC C
84
85
Patient two
86
A 60 year old male had pain at rest for several weeks. Besides hypertension he suffered from
87
no further diseases. Imaging revealed obliteration including the popliteal artery. Below-knee
88
reconstruction was necessary. None of the epifascial veins (GSV, LSV) were useable. The
89
cephalic vein of the left arm had a caliber of 0.20-0.25 cm with a regular anatomy from wrist
90
to shoulder so we considered it matureable by arterialization. The pain could be controlled
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT by painkillers. Creation of the fistula was performed as a regular wrist fistula four weeks
92
prior to the bypass-operation. By the time of the operation the caliber of the fistula vein had
93
grown to 0.45 cm (figure 4). The course of events following surgery was uncomplicated and
94
the patient could be discharged at POD ten. The bypass remains patent (18 months post-op).
95
Post-op Duplex ultrasound shows the distal anastomosis (figure 5).
RI PT
91
96
SC
97
M AN U
98
99
100
104
105
106
107 108
109
110
EP
103
AC C
102
TE D
101
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Discussion
112
We generally use the GSV or the LSV; if necessary we create spliced veins in order to gain the
113
necessary length for a crural bypass. The deep femoral vein (DFV) we find too short and of a
114
caliber which is too wide to use as bypass-option for below knee reconstructions.
115
Furthermore the harvesting is more onerous than in superficial veins. We use the DFV in
116
case of infection of grafts especially in the groin.
117
Creating a fistula first in order to develop a useable bypass vein has scarcely been reported
118
before [5; 6]. Before using the Cephalic vein (CV), of course it has to be considered that the
119
patient needs an additional operation (even though it may be a small one) and that in case
120
of necessary hemodialysis in the future there are less options for access. Furthermore the CV
121
can either be too short for a bypass or of atypical configuration (draining into the basilic
122
vein, no regular anatomy regarding length or location) [4]. Consequently, the vein should not
123
be used in such cases. Another disadvantage is that in cases of critical ischemia, patients
124
usually cannot wait for another 4-5 weeks until the vein is adequately matured for the
125
bypass-operation. On the other hand, creating a fistula first can make a CV useable for
126
bypass surgery which often is not the case in “unprepared” CV (small caliber, thin wall [4]).
127
Furthermore, the direction of maturation (from distal to proximal) makes the vein perfectly
128
shaped for a bypass (large caliber at the proximal anastomosis) so avoiding a caliber
129
mismatch.
130
As others do we perform a meticulous ultrasound investigation preoperatively in order to
131
describe and judge the epifascial veins with the aim of avoiding graft material. In the two
132
cases described, using the CV after the creation of an AV-fistula was a very good option that
133
made it possible to perform below-knee-reconstructions without using prosthetic grafts. In
134
both cases, the course of events was uncomplicated.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
111
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT As the length of the CV is limited, it may be necessary to adapt the operative technique
136
accordingly; in patient two we performed a distal origin bypass to reduce the needed
137
distance.
138
Naturally, the decision for this special procedure cannot be made for every patient; on the
139
contrary, we think that only in few patients (need for below knee-reconstruction; no
140
epifascial veins; time frame for arterial reconstruction within 4-5 weeks) is this kind of
141
bypass-creation suitable.
142
The question remains why this technique has been forgotten over the last decades. Among
143
the reasons are the creation of better graft prostheses (heparin bonded, preformed cuff,
144
tapered grafts, etc.) with improved patency rates compared to former grafts, which may
145
have left behind the urgent need for more complicated ways of creating autologuous
146
bypasses, supported by the respective companies [7]. However, we think that every vascular
147
surgeon should know and keep in mind as many techniques as possible, including the one
148
described by this case report.
151
152
153 154
155
156
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
150
AC C
149
RI PT
135
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 157
References
158
1. Londrey GL, Ramsey DE, Hodgson K J, Barkmeier LD, Sumner DS. Infrapopliteal bypass for
159
severe ischemia: comparison of autogenous vein, composite, and prosthetic grafts. J Vasc
160
Surg 1991;13:631–6
2. Arvela E, Söderström M, Albäck A, Aho PS, Venermo M, Lepäntalo M. Arm vein
162
conduit vs. prosthetic graft in infrainguinal revascularization for critical leg ischemia. J
163
Vasc Surg 2010 Sept; 52: 616-23
SC
RI PT
161
3. Browning N, Zammit M, Rodriguez D, Sauvage L, Loudenback D, Raghavan A. Use of
165
arm veins for lower extremity arterial bypass – results, anatomical features and
166
technical considerations. S Afr J Surg 2000; 38: 36-41
M AN U
164
4. Dae-Joon Park, Yang-Jin Park, Kyoung Won Yoon, Seon-Hee Heo, Dong-Ik Kim, Young-
168
Wook Kim. Lower Extremity Arterial Bypass with Arm Vein Conduits and Literature
169
Review. Vasc Specialist Int 2016; 32: 160-5
TE D
167
5. Flamme A, Van Overbeke H, De Witte J, Decat M, Muysoms F, Claeys D. Technical
171
note: the use of arterialized arm veins in infrainguinal bypass. Acta Chir Belg 1995;
172
95: 106-8
174
6. Stefanov G, Cheshmedzh M, Andreev A, Denchev B, et al. Arterialized cephalic vein as
AC C
173
EP
170
a femoropopliteal bypass graft: A case report. Int J Angiol. 2007 Winter;16(4):146-8.
175
7. Avgerinos E, Sachdey U, Naddaf A, Doucet D, Mohapatra A, Leers S, et al.
176
Autologuous alternative veins may not provide better outcomes than prosthetic
177
conduits for below-knee-bypass when GSV is unavailable. J Vasc Surg 2015; 62: 385-
178
91
179 180
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure legends figure 1 Patient 1: fistula vein of the left arm marked preoperatively
Patient 1: anatomy of the distal situs
figure 3
figure 4
M AN U
Patient 2: prepared vein: before use as below knee bypass
SC
Patient 1: intraoperative angiography depicting the distal anastomosis
RI PT
figure 2
figure 5
AC C
EP
TE D
Patient 2: Duplex ultrasound of the distal anastomosis (ATA = tibial anterior artery)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figures
AC C
EP
Figure 2
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Figure 1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
Figure 4
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Figure 3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Figure 5