Creation of an Arterialized Cephalic Vein as Autologous Bypass for Below-Knee Reconstruction in Critical Limb Ischemia

Creation of an Arterialized Cephalic Vein as Autologous Bypass for Below-Knee Reconstruction in Critical Limb Ischemia

Accepted Manuscript Creation of an arterialized cephalic vein as autologous bypass for below-kneereconstruction in critical limb ischemia Thermann F P...

NAN Sizes 0 Downloads 31 Views

Accepted Manuscript Creation of an arterialized cephalic vein as autologous bypass for below-kneereconstruction in critical limb ischemia Thermann F PII:

S0890-5096(18)30193-6

DOI:

10.1016/j.avsg.2017.12.019

Reference:

AVSG 3748

To appear in:

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Received Date: 26 November 2017 Revised Date:

11 December 2017

Accepted Date: 26 December 2017

Please cite this article as: F T, Creation of an arterialized cephalic vein as autologous bypass for below-knee-reconstruction in critical limb ischemia, Annals of Vascular Surgery (2018), doi: 10.1016/ j.avsg.2017.12.019. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Creation of an arterialized cephalic vein as autologous bypass for below-knee-reconstruction

2

in critical limb ischemia

3

Thermann F

5

Carl-von-Basedow-Hospital Merseburg

7

Teaching Hospital of the University Halle-Wittenberg

8

Weiße Mauer 52

9

06217 Merseburg

M AN U

10

SC

6

RI PT

4

Germany

11

correspondent author:

13

Thermann Florian, MD

14

Head of department of Vascular surgery, Carl-von-Basedow-Hospital Merseburg

15

Weiße Mauer 52

16

06217 Merseburg

17

Germany

18

phone: +49-3461-273101

19

fax:

AC C

EP

TE D

12

+49-3461-273102

20 21 22

conflict of interests: none

23

The patients consented to publishing this report.

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract

26

Two cases of below- knee-bypasses using an arterialized cephalic vein are presented. Both

27

patients had critical ischemia but no greater or lesser saphenous veins were useable.

28

According to ultrasound, the cephalic veins were thin but regularly positioned. Four weeks

29

after wrist fistula was created, ultrasound showed adequate maturation and the bypass

30

operations were performed. Both patients had uneventful courses and were discharged

31

after a few days with patent bypasses since then (35 and 18 months). As this report shows,

32

creation of a fistula can be a useful option to gain autologous bypass material in case of

33

critical limb ischemia.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

25

34

35

39

40

41 42

43

44

45

EP

38

AC C

37

TE D

36

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Introduction

47

Among vascular surgeons there is general consensus on the fact that in cases of below-knee

48

bypass reconstructions autologous material is preferred to grafts for reasons of better

49

patency and lower infection rates [1]. However, autologous material is rarely available;

50

either because the greater saphenous vein (GSV) has already been used for other

51

reconstructive operations or it was removed due to varicosis or its diameter is not sufficient

52

for the use of a bypass; similarly, the lesser saphenous vein (LSV) may be either not long

53

enough or of insufficient caliber. The deep femoral vein can be used also, but firstly the

54

preparing is much more invasive and secondly its length is not sufficient for a below-knee-

55

reconstruction. As another alternative the use of the cephalic vein has been described [2-4];

56

however, often it is a vein of small caliber (lower arm) and with a more vulnerable wall

57

compared to the veins of the leg. Furthermore its length is sometimes not sufficient for a

58

below-knee-reconstruction [4].

59

The use of a matured fistula vein as alternative bypass option has been described before [5;

60

6] but has not actually played a role in autologous bypass creation since. In our own vascular

61

center we have performed two bypass operations using a fistula vein of the arm. The aim of

62

this report is to give an idea in which situations fistula bypasses might be a useful option in

63

critical ischemia in order to widen the options for creating an autologous bypass.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

64

RI PT

46

65

Surgical procedure

66

For the bypass operations we used two teams. Accordingly, in both patients we could

67

harvest the fistula vein and open the situs at the leg at the same time. After tunneling and

68

pulling through the vein in a reversed manner, anastomoses were created simultaneously.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 69

Afterwards angiography was performed. Both patients were put on coumarins as we do in

70

every patient undergoing below-knee-bypass.

71

Patient one

73

An 80 years old patient who was in good health had pain at rest. Further diseases:

74

Hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage III. Angiography revealed obliteration of the

75

tibiofibular trunc. The right GSV had been used for cardiac surgery; the GSV of the left leg

76

was, as well as both LSV, of insufficient caliber (<0.2cm; preoperative ultrasound).

77

Interestingly, the patient had a wrist fistula of the left arm created 10 years previously due

78

to anticipated need for hemodialysis, which subsequently had not been necessary. The

79

fistula vein was well matured along the lower and upper arm (0.40 – 0.45 cm) which gave us

80

the idea of using it as a bypass vein (figure 1-3).

81

Postoperatively, there was a regular course of events. The renal parameters were stable

82

without any deterioration. The patient was discharged on post-operation-day (POD) twelve.

83

The bypass has remained patent since then (35 months post-op).

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

72

AC C

84

85

Patient two

86

A 60 year old male had pain at rest for several weeks. Besides hypertension he suffered from

87

no further diseases. Imaging revealed obliteration including the popliteal artery. Below-knee

88

reconstruction was necessary. None of the epifascial veins (GSV, LSV) were useable. The

89

cephalic vein of the left arm had a caliber of 0.20-0.25 cm with a regular anatomy from wrist

90

to shoulder so we considered it matureable by arterialization. The pain could be controlled

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT by painkillers. Creation of the fistula was performed as a regular wrist fistula four weeks

92

prior to the bypass-operation. By the time of the operation the caliber of the fistula vein had

93

grown to 0.45 cm (figure 4). The course of events following surgery was uncomplicated and

94

the patient could be discharged at POD ten. The bypass remains patent (18 months post-op).

95

Post-op Duplex ultrasound shows the distal anastomosis (figure 5).

RI PT

91

96

SC

97

M AN U

98

99

100

104

105

106

107 108

109

110

EP

103

AC C

102

TE D

101

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Discussion

112

We generally use the GSV or the LSV; if necessary we create spliced veins in order to gain the

113

necessary length for a crural bypass. The deep femoral vein (DFV) we find too short and of a

114

caliber which is too wide to use as bypass-option for below knee reconstructions.

115

Furthermore the harvesting is more onerous than in superficial veins. We use the DFV in

116

case of infection of grafts especially in the groin.

117

Creating a fistula first in order to develop a useable bypass vein has scarcely been reported

118

before [5; 6]. Before using the Cephalic vein (CV), of course it has to be considered that the

119

patient needs an additional operation (even though it may be a small one) and that in case

120

of necessary hemodialysis in the future there are less options for access. Furthermore the CV

121

can either be too short for a bypass or of atypical configuration (draining into the basilic

122

vein, no regular anatomy regarding length or location) [4]. Consequently, the vein should not

123

be used in such cases. Another disadvantage is that in cases of critical ischemia, patients

124

usually cannot wait for another 4-5 weeks until the vein is adequately matured for the

125

bypass-operation. On the other hand, creating a fistula first can make a CV useable for

126

bypass surgery which often is not the case in “unprepared” CV (small caliber, thin wall [4]).

127

Furthermore, the direction of maturation (from distal to proximal) makes the vein perfectly

128

shaped for a bypass (large caliber at the proximal anastomosis) so avoiding a caliber

129

mismatch.

130

As others do we perform a meticulous ultrasound investigation preoperatively in order to

131

describe and judge the epifascial veins with the aim of avoiding graft material. In the two

132

cases described, using the CV after the creation of an AV-fistula was a very good option that

133

made it possible to perform below-knee-reconstructions without using prosthetic grafts. In

134

both cases, the course of events was uncomplicated.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

111

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT As the length of the CV is limited, it may be necessary to adapt the operative technique

136

accordingly; in patient two we performed a distal origin bypass to reduce the needed

137

distance.

138

Naturally, the decision for this special procedure cannot be made for every patient; on the

139

contrary, we think that only in few patients (need for below knee-reconstruction; no

140

epifascial veins; time frame for arterial reconstruction within 4-5 weeks) is this kind of

141

bypass-creation suitable.

142

The question remains why this technique has been forgotten over the last decades. Among

143

the reasons are the creation of better graft prostheses (heparin bonded, preformed cuff,

144

tapered grafts, etc.) with improved patency rates compared to former grafts, which may

145

have left behind the urgent need for more complicated ways of creating autologuous

146

bypasses, supported by the respective companies [7]. However, we think that every vascular

147

surgeon should know and keep in mind as many techniques as possible, including the one

148

described by this case report.

151

152

153 154

155

156

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

150

AC C

149

RI PT

135

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 157

References

158

1. Londrey GL, Ramsey DE, Hodgson K J, Barkmeier LD, Sumner DS. Infrapopliteal bypass for

159

severe ischemia: comparison of autogenous vein, composite, and prosthetic grafts. J Vasc

160

Surg 1991;13:631–6

2. Arvela E, Söderström M, Albäck A, Aho PS, Venermo M, Lepäntalo M. Arm vein

162

conduit vs. prosthetic graft in infrainguinal revascularization for critical leg ischemia. J

163

Vasc Surg 2010 Sept; 52: 616-23

SC

RI PT

161

3. Browning N, Zammit M, Rodriguez D, Sauvage L, Loudenback D, Raghavan A. Use of

165

arm veins for lower extremity arterial bypass – results, anatomical features and

166

technical considerations. S Afr J Surg 2000; 38: 36-41

M AN U

164

4. Dae-Joon Park, Yang-Jin Park, Kyoung Won Yoon, Seon-Hee Heo, Dong-Ik Kim, Young-

168

Wook Kim. Lower Extremity Arterial Bypass with Arm Vein Conduits and Literature

169

Review. Vasc Specialist Int 2016; 32: 160-5

TE D

167

5. Flamme A, Van Overbeke H, De Witte J, Decat M, Muysoms F, Claeys D. Technical

171

note: the use of arterialized arm veins in infrainguinal bypass. Acta Chir Belg 1995;

172

95: 106-8

174

6. Stefanov G, Cheshmedzh M, Andreev A, Denchev B, et al. Arterialized cephalic vein as

AC C

173

EP

170

a femoropopliteal bypass graft: A case report. Int J Angiol. 2007 Winter;16(4):146-8.

175

7. Avgerinos E, Sachdey U, Naddaf A, Doucet D, Mohapatra A, Leers S, et al.

176

Autologuous alternative veins may not provide better outcomes than prosthetic

177

conduits for below-knee-bypass when GSV is unavailable. J Vasc Surg 2015; 62: 385-

178

91

179 180

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure legends figure 1 Patient 1: fistula vein of the left arm marked preoperatively

Patient 1: anatomy of the distal situs

figure 3

figure 4

M AN U

Patient 2: prepared vein: before use as below knee bypass

SC

Patient 1: intraoperative angiography depicting the distal anastomosis

RI PT

figure 2

figure 5

AC C

EP

TE D

Patient 2: Duplex ultrasound of the distal anastomosis (ATA = tibial anterior artery)

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figures

AC C

EP

Figure 2

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Figure 1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

Figure 4

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Figure 3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Figure 5