Journal of Hazardous Materials, 5 (1982) 297-308 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
Al/Cu20
THERMITE
COMPATIBILITY
STUDIES BY X-RAY PHOTOELECTRON
297
AND X-RAY INDUCED
AUGER SPECTROSCOPY
P.S. WANG, L.D. HAWS and W.E. MODDEMAN Mound Facility*,
Monsanto
Research
Corporation,
Miamisburg,
Ohio 45342
A. RENGAN Research
Institute,
University
of Dayton,
Dayton,
Ohio 45469
ABSTRACT
The surface
chemistry
of A1/Cu20
thermite
in powdered
pellets was studied before and after accelerated spectroscopy energies
(XPS) and with x-ray
mixtures
and in pressed
agings with x-ray photoelectron
induced Auger spectroscopy
of the XPS or XAES signals were observed
The kinetic
(XAES).
for Al Is, Cu 2p
0.l 2P3,2'
l/2'
cu L-MM, 0 Is, Al K-LL, C Is and Cu 3s. The A1203
film thicknesses on Al metal surfaces were deduced from signal inten+3 and Al in XPS of Al 2s and from Al K-LL XAES signals. The
sity ratios of Al oxide thicknesses
on Al powders
to form the thermitic
with Cu20 at room temperature, tion of the Al and increased powders
from the manufacturer
layer was found to protect for several
months
Stearic
the Al fuel; further aging of these pellets
acid, the organic
by unpaired
impurities
of thermite
was found to double the oxide layer.
showed a negligible
The CuO impurity
broadened
induced oxida-
Hot pressing
change in composition
This oxide at 180°C
and thickness
of the
The bulk of the pellet was found to be stable and of good quality
surface oxide.
signal.
composition,
the oxide film thickness.
at 425°C to form pellets
Mixing Al
were measured.
additive
electron
were removed
to Al powders,
in Cu20 was observed spin-spin
was detected
in the Cu 2p
interaction
during the high temperature
by the C 1s
signal which was
3/2 in the 0.1~~ dg orbital; pressing
both
operation.
INTRODUCTION The A1/Cu20
thermite
heat is released
2Al + 3Cu20
is a valuable
chemical
for each gram of A1/Cu20
heat source because
mixture
according
580 cal of
to the reaction:
A1203 + 6Cu.
(1)
*Mound Facility is operated by Monsanto Research Corporation Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC04-76-DP00053. 0304-3894/82/0000-0000/$02.75
0 1982
for the U.S.
Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company
298
Aluminum
powder,
being very sensitive
to oxygen or other oxidizers,
grows a film of A1203 on its surface may or may not protect under various in addition
the aluminum
fabrication
and storage
to the problem
problems
A1203 has much higher melting
quality
To increase pressed
of various
fabrication,
and storage
surface
is indeed critical
metal.
process
The main interest
inevitably
We are concerned
has on the quality
powders
to
by x-ray photoelectron
particles
in our thermite
promotes
Stearic
acid has been pro-
may also be informative. of aluminum
fabrication,
(XPS), or electron
it is
a certain
and surface
the thicknesses
(ESCA), and x-ray induced Auger electron
need to be
Therefore,
on the size and geo-
as a lubricant
during production,
spectroscopy
powders
with the degree of in-
of the thermite.
by the manufacturer
of this study is to measure
oxide layers on aluminum
thermite
to 425°C or above, depending
the role played by this "impurity"
analysis
to 660°C for aluminum
shapes for special use.
This heating
in aluminum
fluence this heating added to aluminum
the
of the fact that
of the oxide film on the aluminum
desired
to heat the powders
degree of oxidation
because
and compatibility.
metry to be consolidated.
tector;
(205OOC compared
the energy output per unit volume,
to pellets
necessary
can be anticipated
point
during the stages of production, the material
fuel)
If the layer grows too thick,
conditions.
the thickness
Consequently,
metal).
This oxide film
to the air.
(which is our thermite
inside
of losing too much of the fuel and thus lowering
compatibility
heat output,
after exposure metal
immediately
spectroscopy
spectroscopy
and storage for chemical
(XAES).
(ref. 1,2)
EXPERIMENTAL Sample preparation
and agin%
Theoretically
stoichiometric
were produced
by dry mixing
oxide in a V-blender and Cu20 powders cles.
Thermite
of theoretical
Reynolds
pellets
Aluminum
a 400-mesh
about 6 mm in diameter,
density were pressed
(11 wt % Al and 89 wt % Cu20)
XD28 aluminum
for 1 hr (ref. 3).
were sieved through
under dry nitrogen Thermite
thermite mixtures
from powders
flakes and Cerac "pure" cuprous flakes were used as received
screen to remove oversized about 2 mm in height, with preheated
at 425°C and 12,000 psi for 15 min
mixtures,
thermite
glass tubes separately. were aged at desired
pellets,
and aluminum
TWO environments
temperatures
and at 90%
graphite
dies
(ref. 3,4). powders
were used:
for desired
parti-
were sealed into
dry air and argon.
Samples
periods.
Spectrometer The XPS spectrometer with the accompanying detail
elsewhere
is a modified
AEI ES-100
argon ion sputtering
(ref. 5).
pumps, the vacuum achievable
The system
instrument.
capability
This spectrometer
has been discussed
in more
is pumped by two 250-liter/see turbomolecular -8 in the sample chamber being 10 The chamber torr.
299 reaches baking
temperatures
nitrogen
cryostations.
of more than 15O'C.
by using a titanium
in the system by baking,
Reactive
sublimation
vapors
can be minimized
pump, and by two liquid
The anode used for all the XPS measurements
was silicon.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Calculation
of surface oxide and carbon
The oxide thickness the following
d
0
(do) on aluminum
equation
film thicknesses particle
surfaces
can be calculated
from
(ref. 6-8):
= x0 In I(Io/Im) (I;/Iz) + 11
(2)
where
A is the mean free path of an Al 0 electron. are measured spec0 2 3 IO’ Irn troscopic signal intensities for Al 0 and Al metal, respectively, for our samples 2 3 m cc I and I are intensities for "infinitely" thick samples of such materials. The 0 m carbon film thickness (dc) can be calculated from (ref. 7,8):
d
I hc In {l - +
=c
}
(3)
C
m is the mean free path of an electron from carbon, and I and I are the c C C carbon signal intensities of the thermite sample and of the sample of "infinite"
where
h
carbon thickness,
respectively.
The mean free path of a photoelectron the material attenuation
through which
it passes.
of the photoelectron
A least-squares
fit model which has been developed
KLL Auger with
from the curve 1385 eV kinetic
on its kinetic
energy and
et al. (ref. 9) have studied
from Al 20 3 (kinetic energy
over 1600 eV to cover our kinetic was extrapolated
is dependent Battye
the
from 157 to 1404 eV).
was used to extend the data
energy range and our mean free path of A1203
(ref. 10).
A x0 of 16.5 i was obtained
for Al
energy and 18.1 i for Al 2s ESCA at 3615 eV kinetic
energy. To evaluate tween X
c
hc through
a carbon
of a photoelectron
layer, Wagner
to its kinetic
has shown that the relation
energy E is:
xc = KEp
(4)
where K and p are constants lengths
(ref. 11).
in stearic acid multilayers
respectively
(ref. 12).
Henke has shown that the attenuation
are 60 i and 90 i for 750 eV and 1350 eV,
This gives K = 0.62365
and p = 0.68983
Ac = 0.62365E0.68g83
xc
be-
and
(5) 0
was found to be 94.7 A for C 1s ESCA electrons.
300
To measure
1: (the total intensity
molecular-weight and stearic
carbon-containing
compounds
thick carbon layer) high-
such as candle wax, Apiezon
acid were layered on a 5-mm x 5-mm aluminum
Proof of "infinite" KLL Auger aluminum counts-eV/sec
thickness
the signals
observing
of an aluminum
completely
An averaged
the signal.
the
value of 890
oxide layer of infinite
thickness
(10)
foils were aged at 400°C for 12 hr to con-
to aluminum
Values
of any metal signals.
by scanning
from these measurements.
layers of 5-mm x 5-mm aluminum
vert the surfaces
grease,
foil for measurements.
of the carbon layer was obtained
lines without
was obtained
To measure several
of an infinitely
oxide, which was proved by the absence
of 5725 and 573 counts-eV/sec
were obtained
for Al
KLL Auger and Al 2s ESCA, respectively. The total intensity by measuring
thick Al metal sample
of an "infinitely"
a fresh Al surface
(I:) was obtained An oxide build-up
cleaned by argon ion-etching.
curve was established
in Al 1s ESCA to calibrate possible surface oxide growth m The values of I are 4298 and 501 counts-eV/sec for during the measurements. m KLL Auger and Al 2s ESCA, respectively.
Surface
analysis
It is logical background
ESCA spectra
of aluminum
Carbon
powders
of (a) aluminum
alone as
Fig. 1 gives
flakes aged at 180°C and (b) thermite by Si K, under the same
conditions.
1s signal
- stearic
could be deconvoluted
acid in aluminum
into a doublet
in more than one chemical
carbon of a straight-chain 2a).
structures
for further study of thermite mixtures.
aged at 18O'C; both samples were irradiated
spectrometric
present
powders
to study the surface
knowledge
the overall powders
of aluminum
form.
hydrocarbon
The ratio of the straight-chain
carbon at 286.6 eV was 14:l.
powders.
structure,
This carbon photopeak
which is characteristic
of carbon
The two peaks noted can be attributed and carbon of a carboxylate
hydrocarbon
By comparing
the signal of the specially
prepared
to be from the stearic acid {CH3(CH2)16C02H}
to the aluminum
powders by the manufacturer.
stearic
(carbon 1s photopeak)
was subsequently
identified
(Fig.
at 284.8 eV to the carboxylate
this signal
standard
species
to
acid sample
The theoretical
with
(Fig. 2b), it added
ratio of the two
peaks should be 17:l. 'Ihe amount of stearic ture, as expected, temperature.
acid was found to be less at the higher
because
of removal by higher vapor pressure
Fig. 2c shows that only 75% of the stearic
sample after aging at 180°C in dry air for 40 days. at the higher
storage
temperature
the amount of carbon measured
tempera-
at the higher
acid remains
in the
The amount of carbon measured
in argon was found, in general,
at the same temperature
storage
for storage
to be less than in dry air.
Al IS
Flakes
Kinetic Energy, eV ___t
from aluminum
A1+3 KLL
AI-KLL
Al+3 KLL .
Fig. 1. Overall XPS spectra of (a) 180°C aged flaked aluminum and (b) 180°C aged thermite powder specimens. Both spectra were excited by SiKol radiation.
(b) Thermite Powder
(a) Aluminum
metal
302
I
264.8
eV
C-c, C-H of R Group
1 eV -
-
Binding Energy, eV
Fig. 2. ESCA carbon Is photopeak of stearic acid (a) aluminum flakes stored at room temperature, in: (b) stearic acid sample, and (c) aluminum powder stored at 180°C for 40 days in dry air.
303 Surface
change
powder before
in
aluminum
powders
aging is approximately
and tended to be destroyed
by aging.
alone.
carbon
Is signal intensity
aluminum
this period
during
Residual
for 40 days, powder
aging.
of added stearic
Fig. 3 shows such a change in the Table 1 gives results of layer thick-
stored at room temperature,
for the same samples.
The thicknesses
layers are also shown in Table 1.
Room Temperature
A6
Fig. 4 shows
powder stored at 180°C
stored at 180°C for 91 days, and flamed foil. peaks
acid
carbon after aging could be attrib-
from Al KLL Auger and Al 2s ESCA data.
KLL Auger of powder
the 2s photoelectron
layer on the aluminum
50-60 i thick because
uted to the x-ray tube or the atmosphere.
nesses during
The carbon
days
Kinetic Energy, eV _) Fig. 3. Carbon 1s XPS of aluminum powders aged at 180°C in air for various periods.
Fig. 5 shows of these oxide
304 TABLE 1 Aluminum-KLL environments
Auger and 2s ESCA results
for aluminum
powders
aged in different
do (A)
Sample d_ (%
KLL Auger
Aluminum powder in air at room temperature
64.4
8.7
11.1
Aluminum powder in air 40 days at 180°C
56.8
11.6
12.4
Aluminum powder in air 91 days at 180°C
62.3
13.0
13.0
Aluminum powder in air 136 days at 180°C
41.8
13.0
14.0
Aluminum powder in argon 40 days at 180°C
10.6
9.1
11.2
Aluminum powder in argon 91 days at 18O'C
16.9
9.1
10.8
Aluminum powder in argon 136 days at 18OOC
26.7
12.0
12.0
Aluminum
powders
from the manufacturer
Al 2s
have an oxide layer of about 9 i as
expected because of exposure to the air during storage. This layer increased to 0 0 about 12 A when aged about 40 days in air at 180°C and to 13 A in 3 mo. After 3 mo there seems to be no further of the sample tube
no oxygen was present, increase
storage
in the oxide layer
experimental
error.
because
The 2s signals
air).
(about 9 i), but the result derived
for 136 days could be an
The deviation
there is a certain
On the lower-energy
side of both the KLL and 2s signals, of the surface plasma.
Thermite
mixture
The overall Comparing
surface
higher
than
of results
degree of error
technique.
weak signal because to the main signals.
since
to two reasons:
are not well resolved;
in curve deconvolution
of the small size As expected,
from Al 2s ESCA are slightly
but show the same trend.
from KLL to 2s can be attributed
(2)
possibly
under argon at 180°C for 40 and 91 days showed no
The results
those from the Auger process
(1)
increase,
(which could not supply additional
The correction
there exists a
This needs to be corrected
term is smaller
for 2s than for KLL.
analysis
XPS spectrum
of thermite
Fig. la to lb, it is obvious
powders
aged at 180°C is shown in Fig. lb.
that in thermite
powders, Cu 2p l/2' cu 2P3,2' and Cu L M of Cu20 were detected. Unfortunately Cu 3s and Cu 3p happen 3 4,5 M4,5 to be at the same position as Al 2s and Al 2p, respectively.
305
1383.5
ev
1390.8
eV
Kinetic Energy, eV w Fig. 4. Al-KLL spectra of: (a) aluminum flakes stored at room temperature, (b) aluminum flakes after mixing with CuaO to form thermites at room temperature, (c) thermite powders aged at 180°C for 91 days in dry air.
306
1383.5
eV
Al+3
b)
Kinetic Energy, eV
w
Fig. 5. Al-KLL Auger spectra of: (a) Al/Cu20 thermite pellet after pressing at 425"C, (b) pellet aged at 18O'C for 27 days in dry air.
307
The carbon Is signal from thermite carbon Is signal
from aluminum flakes.
powder
flakes.
After the sample
signal
from aluminum
heated
to 18O"C, the signal was reduced
a small degree of oxidation removing
stearic
occurred
during
figure,
the mixing
This suggested
and the heating,
that
thereby
flakes before mixing with Cu20,
powders
to form thermite
aged at 180°C in dry air for 91 days.
that oxide
film thickness
increases
(b) powder
Just from this
after mixing and further
during aging.
Results Table 2.
to that
acid.
it is obvious
increases
of the
(either in dry air or argon) was
flakes after mixing with Cu20 at room temperature
and (c) thermite
one-fourth
almost to background.
Fig. 4 shows Al-KLL Auger of (a) aluminum aluminum
is approximately
Also, it is skewed when compared
derived
from the Al-KLL Auger for thermite
The oxide film of the powders
powders
at room temperature
are tabulated
in
was found to be about
TABLE 2 Aluminum-KLL conditions
Auger results
for aluminum/cuprous
oxide thermite
do (i,
Sample Powder in air at room temperature
10.8
Powder in air 40 days at 18O'C
21.4
Powder in air 91 days at 180°C
24.8
Powder in air 136 days at 180°C
23.8
Powder in argon 136 days at 18OOC
22.1
Air, room temperature,
22.3 pellet
Air, 27 days at GO'C,pellet surface
25.4
Air, 27 days at 6O"C, fractured pellet
23.1
Air, 27 days at 18O"C, pellet surface
25.7
Argon, 131 days at 18O"C, pellet
28.1 surface
Argon, 131 days at 180°C, fractured
23.4 pellet
aged at various
11 A, which means that just mixing creates
an oxidation
layer increases
reaction
aluminum
powder
that increases
and Cu20 at room temperature
the oxide layer by 2 i.
The oxide
to about 21 i for the first 40 days at 180°C in air and levels
off after 3 mo at 24-25 A.
In argon at 180°C for 136 days, the oxide layer was
found to be about 22 i. Fig. 5 shows the Al-KLL Auger of a thermite
pellet
(b) after aging at 180°C for 27 days in dry air. that aging of the pellet ness; but comparing induces
shows an insignificant
Fig. 5a to Fig. 4b proves
some oxidation
and increases
In order to press thermite up to 425OC.
This increased
aging of the pellets
(a) after pressing,
Comparing
change in the oxide layer thickthat pressing
of the pellet
it was necessary
to bring the temperature
the oxide film from about 11 to about 22 i.
caused little increase As expected,
the pellet was found to be thinner
indeed
the oxide layer considerably.
pellets,
than 6 i in 131 days at 18O'C.
and
(a) and (b) indicates
in oxide layer thickness
Further
- no more
the oxide layer in the bulk part of
than that on the surface.
The results
are
shown in Table 2.
REFERENCES 1 K. Siegbahn, C. Nordling, A. Fahlman, R. Nordberg, K. Hamrin, J. Hedman, G. Johansson, T. Bergmark, S. Karlsson, I. Lindgren and B. J. Lindberg, Atomic Molecular and Solid State Structure Studies by Means of Electron Spectroscopy, Almquist and Wiksells, Uppsala, 1967. 2 K. Siegbahn, C. Nordling, G. Johansson, J. Hedman, P. F. Heden, K. Hamrin, U. Gelius, T. Bergmark, L. Werne, R. Maune and Y. Baer, ESCA Applied to Free Molecules, North Holland-American Elsevier, Amsterdam, New York, 1969. 3 L. 0. Haws, M. D. Kelly, J. H. Mohler and A. Latkin, Consolidated Al/&20 Thermites, presented at the 6th Int. Pyrotechnic Seminar, Estes Park, Colorado, July 17-21, 1978, MLM-2531(OP). 4 A. Gibson and J. R. Marshall, Monsanto Research Corporation, private communication. 5 T. M. Wittberg, J. R. Hoenigman, W. E. Moddeman, C. R. Cothern and M. R. Gulett, J. Vat. Sci. Technol., 15(1978) 348. 6 T. A. Carlson and G. E. McGuire, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 1(1972/1973) 161. 7 P. S. Wang, L. D. Haws, W. E. Moddeman and A. Rengan, Aluminum Particle Surface Studies in Al/Cu20 by Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis and Auger Electron Spectroscopy, MLM-2664 (November 9, 1979), 23 pp. 8 W. E. Moddeman, A. Rengan, P. S. Wang and L. D. Haws, Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Explosives and Pyrotechnics, San Francisco, California, February 14-16, 1979. 9 F. L. Battye, T. Liesegang, C. G. Leckey and J. G. Jerkin, Phys. Lett., 49A(1974) 155. 10 A. Rengan and W. E. Moddeman, X-ray Photoelectron Studies on the Thermite Mixture of Aluminum and Cuprous Oxide, UDRI-TR-77-30, University of Dayton Research Institute (19771 _ 11 C. D. Wagner, Anal. Chem., 49(19771 1292. 12 B. L. Henke, J. Phys. (Paris), C4(1971) 155.