Accepted Manuscript Culture conditions improvement of Crassostrea gigas using a potential probiotic Bacillus sp strain Kais Fdhila, Najla Haddaji, Ibtissem Chakroun, Amel Dhiaf, Mohammed Ezz Edine Macherki, Bochra Khouildi, Faouzi Lamari, Kamel Chaieb, Nabil Abid, Hajer Marzougui, Sadok Khouadja, Hechmi Missaoui PII:
S0882-4010(16)30899-3
DOI:
10.1016/j.micpath.2017.07.017
Reference:
YMPAT 2355
To appear in:
Microbial Pathogenesis
Received Date: 18 December 2016 Revised Date:
10 July 2017
Accepted Date: 10 July 2017
Please cite this article as: Fdhila K, Haddaji N, Chakroun I, Dhiaf A, Edine Macherki ME, Khouildi B, Lamari F, Chaieb K, Abid N, Marzougui H, Khouadja S, Missaoui H, Culture conditions improvement of Crassostrea gigas using a potential probiotic Bacillus sp strain, Microbial Pathogenesis (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.07.017. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Culture conditions improvement of Crassostrea gigas using a potential probiotic
2
Bacillus sp strain
3
Kais Fdhilaa, Najla Haddaji*a, Ibtissem Chakrouna, Amel Dhiafa, , Mohammed Ezz Edine
4
Macherkia, Bochra Khouildib., Faouzi Lamaria, Kamel Chaieba, Nabil Abida, Hajer
5
Marzouguib, Sadok Khouadjaa, Hechmi Missaouib.
6
a
7
Monastir.
8
b
Fisheries Laboratory, Higher Institute of Agriculture Tunis.
SC
9
RI PT
Laboratory of Analysis, Treatment and Valorization of pollutants Faculty of Pharmacy of
10 11
M AN U
12 13 14
⁎ Corresponding author:
16
Najla Haddaji
17
Laboratory of Analysis, Treatment and Valorization of Pollutants of the Environment and
18
Products (LATVPEP).
19
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Monastir. Monastir 5000. Tunisia
20
Tel.: (+216)73466244
21
Fax: (+216) 73461830
22
E-mail address:
[email protected].
24 25 26 27
EP
AC C
23
TE D
15
28 29 30 31 32 33 1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract
35
It is well demonstrated that some probiotics improve rearing water quality and thereby have
36
beneficial effects on reared organisms. We conducted this study to determine the effect of
37
Bacillus consortium on Crassostrea gigas reared in contemned seawater with indigo dye
38
priory treated with Bacillus or no treated. This effect was studied by assessing hemocytes
39
death using flow cytometry analysis. We found that the percentage of decolorization of
40
indigo dye in polluted seawater in presence of C. gigas increased from 41% to 90% when
41
using Bacillus consortium. In these conditions, the hemocytes mortality of reared C. gigas
42
decreased from 87% to 56%. We have demonstrated also that seawater contemned with
43
priory treated indigo with Bacillus consortium is less toxic than seawater contemned with
44
the no treated indigo. The percentage of hemocytes death is 81% for the contemned seawater
45
with indigo and 56% for no contemned seawater. This consortium shows a protector effect
46
of C. gigas against Vibrio harveyi contemning reared seawater.
47
Key words: Crassostrea gigas, Bacillus consortium, indigo.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
34
48 49 50
54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
EP
53
AC C
52
TE D
51
62 63 64 65 66 2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 67
1. Introduction Most of pollutants are thrown out on soil and get washed off during monsoon months and
69
are thereby conducted to lagoons and coastal seawater. They lead to ecological and sanitary
70
problems such as the decrease of aquatic biodiversity and the intoxication of aquatic
71
organisms particularly filter feeders like oysters. The world annual production of dyes is
72
estimated at more than 80000 tons used mainly in food industries, cosmetics, paper mills
73
and especially in textile industries which absorb alone more than 70% of the produced total
74
quantity [1]. The intense use of the synthetic dyes in these various industries generates
75
sources of considerable pollution of the environment. Indeed, 10 to 15% of the quantity of
76
dyes used is rejected into the natural environment [2]. These dyes, in addition to dangerous
77
pollution that they can generate, constitute because of their toxicity a potential danger to
78
both humans and environment [3]. Since the very early stages of the history of mankind,
79
several natural dyestuffs have been used. In fact, the art of dyeing with indigo dates back
80
several thousand years. The Indigo is classified as strongly toxic dyes [4]. The indigo can
81
cause a major problem for aquaculture in general and particularly in Crassostrea gigas.
82
The Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas is one of the most important cultured species, with a
83
high value and strong market demand [5]. Oyster farming practices usually include
84
numerous transfers of oysters at all life stages, especially of spat and juveniles grown in
85
hatchery and nursery systems before being transferred to oyster farming areas in open
86
seawater [6]. Along with these farming practices, oysters must adapt to new abiotic and
87
biotic environments. Biotic changes include interactions with new, potentially pathogenic or
88
toxic microorganisms that infect oysters through the feeding and filtration process. The most
89
important factor affecting aquaculture is the incidence of microbial pathologies, mainly
90
bacterial in origin. Vibrio harveyi, and Vibrio anguillarum are most frequently isolated
91
marine Vibrio species [7] [8], having been associated with large-scale losses of larval and
92
juvenile penaeids [9] and also causing several opportunistic diseases to fishes [10] [11].
93
Vibrios are gram-negative, ubiquitous in marine and estuarine ecosystems as well as
94
aquaculture farms, and comprise one of the major microbiota of these ecosystems. Many
95
vibrios are serious pathogens for animals reared in aquaculture [12] [13]. Vibriosis, caused
96
by infection by Vibrio spp, is one of the most prevalent diseases in fishes and other
97
aquaculture-reared organisms and is widely responsible for mortality in cultured aquaculture
98
systems worldwide [14] [15].
99
Disease outbreaks in shellfish aquaculture are managed using methods such as disease
100
avoidance, frequent water changes, good husbandry, and the use of immune-stimulants and
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
68
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT antibiotics [16]. Antibiotics have been used widely in aquaculture systems as a method for
102
disease control. However, because of the emergence of antibiotic resistance and concerns
103
about environmental pollution, alternatives to the use of antibiotics are needed [17], [18].
104
One of these alternative methods is the use of nonpathogenic microorganisms called
105
probiotics. Bacillus sp. is widely used as probiotic in aquaculture but it is not autochthonous
106
in gastrointestinal tract. However, it may be active during intestinal transit [19]. In a recent
107
study, two marine bacteria, Bacillus pumilus RI0695 and Phaeobacter gallaeciensis were
108
previously reported to provide significant protection of the Eastern oyster larvae
109
Crassostreae virginica when challenged with the shellfish pathogen Vibrio tubiashii [20].
110
Additionally, Bacillus sp. had been shown to have health benefits for Dicentrachus labrax
111
larvaes [21]. Probiotics have been tested successfully in shellfish culture. Chniti et al. (2003)
112
[22] isolated two yeasts and one bacterial strain (designated SS1, AY1, and SY9, resp.) from
113
the digestive tract of abalone (Haliotis midae). A diet was formulated with a mixture of the
114
three putative probiotics. Each probiont was added to the feed to achieve a final
115
concentration of approximately 107 cells g−1 of dry feed. The growth rate of small (20 mm)
116
and large (67 mm) abalone was improved by 8% and 34%, respectively, in eight months
117
cultures. Furthermore, abalones supplemented with probiotics had a survival rate of 62% to
118
the pathogenic bacterium Vibrio anguillarum compared to 25% survival of untreated
119
animals. Another study describes that the daily application of Phaeobacter inhibens and B.
120
pumillus RI06-95 mixed with algal feed to culture tanks in the hatchery increased survival of
121
oyster larvae to experimental challenge with V. coralliilyticus RE22 [23]. Probiotic
122
microorganisms have the ability to release chemical substances with bactericidal or
123
bacteriostatic effect on pathogenic bacteria that are in the intestine of the host, thus
124
constituting a barrier against the proliferation of opportunistic pathogens. In general, the
125
antibacterial effect is due to one or more of the following factors: production of antibiotics,
126
bacteriocins, siderophores, enzymes (lysozymes, proteases) and/or hydrogen peroxide, as
127
well as alteration of the intestinal pH due to the generation of organic acids [18]. According
128
to these data, the genus Bacillus is one of dominant probiotics, which was commonly used in
129
aquaculture. More and more studies confirmed that endogenous or exogenous Bacillus
130
strains could be effective in improving growth, immunity and disease resistance of shellfish
131
[24] [25] [20].
132
This study thus investigated the possible protection effect of Bacillus sp for Crassostrea
133
gigas reared in indigo polluted seawater and infected with Vibrio Harvey.
134
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
101
2. Materials and methods 4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 135
2.1.Samples collection and bacterial characterization Three Bacillus strains, isolated from Tunisian hypersaline environments in a previous study
137
in our laboratory [26], are used in this study as Bacillus consortium. Sequencing analyses
138
showed that these bacteria corresponded to the genus Bacillus sp such as Bacillus subtilis, B.
139
cereus, B. coagulans [26]. These strains were preserved in our laboratory and their purity
140
was routinely checked. Stock cultures were stored at 80°C in powdered skimmed milk
141
suspension with 25% glycerol. Bacillus strains were isolated, in this study, on nutrient plates
142
and inoculated in nutrient broth prepared with seawater. It was incubated for 24 hours at
143
20°C [27].
144
Vibrio harveyi ATCC 14126 was routinely cultured in marine broth. It is used for control as
145
positive pathogen.
SC
RI PT
136
2.2.Screening and identification of micro-organisms with bioremediation activity
147
Indigo was submitted to decimal dilution in a mineral liquid medium (MLM) prepared as
148
described previously by [28] up to a concentration of 1.75 mg/ml.
149
Isolated bacteria from sludge and wastewater of industrial textile plant were inoculated in
150
flasks containing MlM medium with 1.75 mg/ml indigo dye concentration. Then flasks were
151
incubated at 37°C under shaking conditions (120 rpm) in a rotary shaker. Samples were
152
collected at different time to determine decolorization. Optical densities (OD) were
153
determined using a spectrophotometer, Shimadzu UV-240I PC model Kyoto, Japan) at the
154
max λ max 664 nm. The percentage of decolorization was calculated as following:
155
decolorization (%) = [absorbance at t0 – absorbance at t1] * 100/ absorbance at t0.
TE D
2.3.Oysters challenge
EP
156
M AN U
146
Crassortrea gigas were purchased from a rearing plant in a lagoon after an acclimatization
158
period of one week at 25°C in aquariums containing 10 liters of seawater. Experiments were
159
carried out in six aquariums, each containing six specimens.
160
Aquarium 1 : containing C. gigas and seawater; Aquarium 2: containing C. gigas, seawater
161
and indigo (1.74 mg/ml); Aquarium 3: containing C. gigas, seawater and filtrate from a
162
culture of Bacillus consortium where indigo was degraded; Aquarium 4: Same content as
163
the second aquarium but reared seawater is inoculated with Bacillus consortium (10 ml of
164
Bacillus suspension 106 CFU/ml); Aquarium 5: seawater inoculated with Bacillus
165
consortium (10 ml of Bacillus suspension 106 CFU/ml); Aquarium 6: the same content as
166
the fifth aquarium but oysters are infected with V. harveyi ATCC 14126; Aquarium 7: the
167
same content as the sixth aquarium but oysters are infected with V. harveyi ATCC 14126and
168
added with Bacillus consortium (10 ml of Bacillus suspension 106 CFU/ml).
AC C
157
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 169
2.4.Hemolymph collection C. gigas was collected from the lagoon of Bizerte (Tunisia). It is polluted with industrial and
171
domestic wastewater.
172
Hemolymph was collected from the adductor muscle following Chen method (1996). A
173
notch was filed on the dorsal side of the shell valve, adjacent to the adductor muscle. 2ml of
174
hemolymph were collected aseptically from each animal.
175
A total of 10 000 hemocytes were analyzed using a flow cytometer BD FAC Caliber
176
coupled with a Power Mac G3PC equipped with a Cell Quest Pro software
177
RI PT
170
2.5.Hemocytes viability assay
150 µl of hemolymph was mixed with 150 µl of an antiaggregant solution (AASH) and 5 ml
179
of propidium iodide 1mg/l (PI) (Sigma) at a final concentration of 20µg/ml. The Propodium
180
iodide binds to DNA double stranded and absorbs at wavelength above 630 nm. It enters and
181
stains the cells but can’t cross the membrane of viable cells. Tubes were incubated with PI
182
and AASH for 10 minutes at 20°C before analysis. Dead hemocytes are more fluorescent in
183
flow cytometer’s orange light detector.
184
We evaluate the percentage of dead heamocytes in proportion to the total number. 2.6. Statistical analysis
M AN U
185
SC
178
Past 3.05 and Graphpad prism 6.05 softwares are used for statistical analysis and graphics.
187
For all tests we used hypothetical risk α= 0.05 for alternative hypothesis acceptance. Bar
188
chartwas plotted with standard deviation show.
TE D
186
3. Results
190
3.1.Screening and identification of bacterial strains decolorizing indigo dye
EP
189
More than 1500 biomasses from textile wastewater and sludge were tested for their ability to
192
decolorize diluted indigo dye. Active strains associated with these biomasses were
193
identified. Gram negative rods shape bacteria and some Gram positive bacteria were
194
selected. Gram negative rods as Pseudomonas stutzeri ; Pseudomonas testosteroni;
195
Pseudomonas
196
Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Sphingomonas paucimobilis; Aeromonas hydrophila. And for
197
Gram positive bacteria, we identified Staphylococcus epidermidi and Bacillus subtilis.We
198
have been interested to Bacillus sp strains.
199
AC C
191
vesicularis ;
Pseudomonasmaltophilia ;
Pseudomonas
acidovorans;
3.2.Biodegradation of indigo by Bacillus consortium
200
The percentage of decolorization of indigo dye in polluted seawater in presence of C. gigas
201
increased from 41% to 90% (Table 1, Aquarium 4) when using Bacillus consortium. These
202
bacteria can survive in seawater because of their sporulation characteristics. In the absence 6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT of Bacillus consortium, C. gigas and seawater microflora, the percentage of decolorized
204
indigo is 41% (Table 1, Aquarium 2).
205
The Bacillus consortium has also improved the seawater quality of the aquarium
206
contaminated with the previous product of indigo degradation: In aquarium 3, the percentage
207
of decolorization was 74 %. Treated C. gigas with indigo in aquarium 2 accumulated this
208
dye in its gills. This can have a harmful effect on consumers’ health. Table1 shows optical
209
density variation of indigo in reared seawater of C.gigas under different conditions.
210
RI PT
203
3.3.Crassostrea gigas hemocytes protection by Bacillus consortium
Rearing seawater of the aquarium 1 and 5 is not contaminated with indigo dye so a low
212
mortality of haemocytes was obtained in the aquarium1 and no mortality in the aquarium 5.
213
We found that the indigo dye is very toxic for C. gigas and the mortality of haemocytes
214
increased in the aquarium 2 c contaminated with diluted indigo from1.2 aqua. (1) up to 87%
215
(aqua.2).
216
Rearing seawater contaminated with treated indigo using Bacillus consortium is less toxic to
217
C. gigas than that contaminated with untreated indigo. When added to contemned seawater
218
with indigo, Bacillus consortium decreased the hemocytes mortality of reared C. gigas from
219
87% to 56% (fig.1: Aquarium 2 and 4). It has also a protecting effect against pathogenic
220
bacteria V. harveyi ATCC 14126. Less mortality is obtained in the aqu.6 containing Bacillus
221
consortium than in the aqua.7. 4. Dicussion
M AN U
TE D
222
SC
211
Effluent from the textile industry is loaded of non-biodegradable dyes which make them
224
difficult to apply biological treatments. Several techniques have been employed to remove
225
dyes from wastewater. These effluents have an impact on aquaculture. Aquaculture is a fast-
226
growing food production sector and the use of probiotics for the improvement of aquatic
227
environmental quality as major areas for further research in disease control in aquaculture
228
[29], which would help to reduce the use of antimicrobial agents. However, the addition of
229
probiotics is now also a common practice in commercial shrimp hatcheries in Mexico [30].
230
The most studied probiotics are usually Bacillus and Lactobacillus species [31]. It has been
231
reported that use of Bacillus sp. improved water quality, survival and growth rates, increased
232
the health status of juvenile Penaeus monodon and reduced the pathogenic vibrios [32].
233
Indeed, the probiotic effect of Bacillus sp was reported under in vitro and in vivo condition
234
[33].
235
Bacillus strains isolated from lagoons can survive in seawater because of their tolerance to
236
high pH. It was found that they prefer pH>8.9. They also tolerate high salinity because of
AC C
EP
223
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT their origin: they were isolated from lagoons having a high salinity level [26]. These bacteria
238
can survive in seawater because of their sporulation characteristics. This Bacillus
239
consortium is as active as rot white fungi [34] but fungi need low pH and special nutrients to
240
grow. Experiences conducted by von Verschuer (2000) [35] to improve seawater quality
241
using Bacillus, had shown that they can easily multiply in seawater. So, Bacillus strains can
242
be used in rearing media of aquatic organisms like filter feeds. When added to rearing water
243
and is generally more effective in converting organic matter back to CO2 than Gram negative
244
bacilli. Venkateswara et al.(2007) [36] had reported that microorganisms with probiotic
245
effect can regulate microflora and improve the chemical quality of the water by
246
decomposing pollutants, minimizing the toxic gases like NH3, N2O, H2O2. According to
247
Kolndadacha et al. (2011) [37], Bacillus consortium improves water quality and increases
248
heamocytes viability from 56% to 87% when added to rearing water of C.gigas. It can be
249
considered as potential probiotic in rearing water of aquatic organisms. The percentage of
250
decolorization of indigo dye in polluted seawater in presence of C. gigas increased from
251
41% to 90% (Table 1, Aquarium 4) when using Bacillus consortium. Our results showed
252
that indigo biodegradation products are harmless for C. gigas and decrease haemocytes
253
mortality. Bacillus consortium is efficient in seawater control when added to the rearing
254
medium. Mahdhi at al. (2007) [26] found similar results during Dicentrarchus labrax
255
treatment by Bacillus. Bacillus strains isolated and used in this study may have an
256
interesting antagonistic activity against pathogens. They have biomedical and antibacterial
257
effects. In addition, they can be easily used in rearing seawater areas. These sporuling
258
bacteria can resist to hostile conditions. In this investigation, we have shown that Bacillus
259
sp. strains isolated from industrial textile waste water are able to degrade indigo. The
260
optimization of their biodegradation activity in mixture showed that they need high pH and
261
can be used in seawater. Experiments performed in rearing seawater of C. gigas with
262
previously biodegraded indigo product water condition using Bacillus biomass show that
263
indigo is more toxic for C. gigas and leads to higher haemocytes mortality rates than water
264
contaminated with previously biodegraded indigo product.
265
These strains have no toxic effect on C. gigas. No haemocytes mortality occurred in our
266
assays. Similar results were found by Mahdhi et al. (2010) [26]. Bacillus consortium
267
selected in our study, showed an antagonism effect against fish and shellfish pathogens [26].
268
These results are in concordance with previous studies showed that B. cereus and B.
269
thuringiensis mixture treatment resulted in survival rate of 100%, compared with 75% in the
270
treatment without Bacillus. Authors concluded that B. cereus and B. thuringiensis have
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
237
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT potential applications for controlling pathogenic V. harveyi in shrimp aquaculture [38].
272
Furthermore, it was observed that the addition of B. subtilis to the rotifer culture water
273
resulted in a significant increase in rotifer numbers and a reduction of Vibrio levels. B.
274
subtilis appears to be a promising probiotic for rotifer cultures [39].
275
Uncontrolled effect of antibiotics, their bad use and their high coast lead us to us to propose
276
Bacillus consortium as an alternative substitute to antibiotics [40]. Several commercial
277
consortia of probiotics (Bacillus or nitrifying bacteria) such as "Biostar"; BRF-1A; BRF 13
278
A; Pond PrO-Vc are used to improve water quality and animal health. Experiments
279
performed in C. gigas rearing seawater show that indigo is more toxic for C.gigas and lead
280
to a higher haemocyte mortality rate than water contaminated with priory biodegradated
281
indigo product. Bacillus consortium added to contaminated seawater with indigo improves
282
seawater quality and results in a lower hemocytes mortality rate. It was reported that a
283
commercially prepared bacterial mixture of Bacillus spp. mixed into the rearing water
284
increased survival and production of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) [33]. Currently
285
there are no commercially available probiotics for shellfish aquaculture. Recent study
286
describes efforts to create a stable formulation of B. pumilus RI0695 for delivery at shellfish
287
hatcheries [20] [23]. Some effort to create a lyophilized probiotic formulation of P.
288
gallaeciensis that provides reduced mortality of C. virginica larvae when exposed to the
289
shellfish pathogen V. tubiashii RE22 [20].
SC
M AN U
5. Conclusion
TE D
290
RI PT
271
In this investigation, we have shown that three strains of Bacillus sp. isolates are able to
292
degrade indigo.
293
Experiments performed in rearing seawater showed that Bacillus consortium added to
294
contaminated seawater with indigo dye or with Vibrio harvey improves seawater quality and
295
results in lower haemocytes mortality rates.
296
Rearing seawater contemned with indigo product is more toxic for C. gigas and leads to
297
higher haemocyte mortality rates than water contaminated with previously biodegraded
298
indigo product.
299
Conflict of interest
300
No conflicts of interests exist.
301
Acknowledgement
302
We thank all the members of both laboratories for their collaboration.
303
References
AC C
EP
291
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
[1] Zollinger H. Color chemistry: syntheses, properties, and applications of organic dyes and pigments: John Wiley & Sons; 2003. [2] Cooper P. Colour in dyehouse effluent: Society of dyers and colourists; 1995. [3] Anliker R. Ecotoxicology of dyestuffs—a joint effort by industry. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 1979;3:59-74. [4] Mittal A, Mittal J, Kurup L. Batch and bulk removal of hazardous dye, indigo carmine from wastewater through adsorption. Journal of hazardous materials. 2006;137:591-602. [5] Castagna M, Gibbons M, Kurkowski K. Culture: application. The eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica Maryland Sea Grant, College Park, Maryland. 1996:675-90. [6] Helm MM, Bourne N, Lovatelli A. Hatchery culture of bivalves: a practical manual: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations; 2004. [7] Arias C, Macián M, Aznar R, Garay E, Pujalte M. Low incidence of Vibrio vulnificus among Vibrio isolates from sea water and shellfish of the western Mediterranean coast. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 1999;86:125-34. [8] Frans I, Michiels CW, Bossier P, Willems K, Lievens B, Rediers H. Vibrio anguillarum as a fish pathogen: virulence factors, diagnosis and prevention. Journal of fish diseases. 2011;34:643-61. [9] Diggles B, Moss G, Carson J, Anderson C. Luminous vibriosis in rock lobster Jasus verreauxi (Decapoda: Palinuridae) phyllosoma larvae associated with infection by Vibrio harveyi. Diseases of aquatic organisms. 2000;43:127-37. [10] Hispano C, Nebra Y, Blanch AR. Isolation of Vibrio harveyi from an ocular lesion in the short sunfish (Mola mola). Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists (United Kingdom). 1997. [11] Alcaide E, Gil-Sanz C, Sanjuan E, Esteve D, Amaro C, Silveira L. Vibrio harveyi causes disease in seahorse, Hippocampus sp. Journal of Fish Diseases. 2001;24:311-3. [12] Austin B, Austin D. Vibriosis, Bacterial fish pathogens and disease i n farmed wild fish. Chapter. 1993;13:263-87. [13] Bergh Ø, Nilsen F, Samuelsen OB. Diseases, prophylaxis and treatment of the Atlantic halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus: a review. Diseases of Aquatic organisms. 2001;48:5774. [14] Lavilla-Pitogo CR, Leaño EM, Paner MG. Mortalities of pond-cultured juvenile shrimp, Penaeus monodon, associated with dominance of luminescent vibrios in the rearing environment. Aquaculture. 1998;164:337-49. [15] Chen F-R, Liu P-C, Lee K-K. Lethal attribute of serine protease secreted by Vibrio alginolyticus strains in kuruma prawn Penaeus japonicus. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C. 2000;55:94-9. [16] Elston RA, Ford SE. Shellfish diseases and health management. Shellfish aquaculture and the environment. 2011:359-94. [17] Austin B. Antibiotic pollution from fish farms: effects on aquatic microflora. Microbiological Sciences. 1984;2:113-7. [18] Verschuere L, Rombaut G, Sorgeloos P, Verstraete W. Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews. 2000;64:65571. [19] Gatesoupe F. The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture. 1999;180:147-65. [20] Dao CA. Chemical investigation of candidate probiotics in aquaculture and formulation of a probiotic agent for oyster larviculure: University of Rhode Island; 2015. [21] Mahdhi A, Kamoun F, Messina C, Bakhrouf A. Probiotic properties of Brevibacillus brevis and its influence on sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larval rearing. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2012;6:6487-95.
AC C
304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
[22] Macey B, Coyne V. Improved growth rate and disease resistance in farmed Haliotis midae through probiotic treatment. Aquaculture. 2005;245:249-61. [23] Sohn S. Evaluation of the efficacy of candidate probiotics for disease prevention in shellfish hatcheries: University of Rhode Island; 2016. [24] Karim M, Zhao W, Rowley D, Nelson D, Gomez-Chiarri M. Probiotic Strains for Shellfish Aquaculture: Protection of Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica, Larvae and Juveniles Againsl Bacterial Challenge. Journal of Shellfish Research. 2013;32:401-8. [25] Nemutanzhela ME, Roets Y, Gardiner N, Lalloo R. The use and benefits of Bacillus based biological agents in aquaculture. Sustainable Aquaculture Techniques: Intech; 2014. [26] Mahdhi A, Harbi B, Esteban MÁ, Chaieb K, Kamoun F, Bakhrouf A. Using mixture design to construct consortia of potential probiotic Bacillus strains to protect gnotobiotic Artemia against pathogenic Vibrio. Biocontrol science and technology. 2010;20:983-96. [27] Cabo M, Murado M, González MP, Pastoriza L. A method for bacteriocin quantification. Journal of applied microbiology. 1999;87:907-14. [28] Chniti N, Chriaa J, Dhief A, Bakhrouf A. Biodegradation of indigo and textile wastewater by acclimated biomasses. Journal Européen d'Hydrologie (France). 2003. [29] Subasinghe R. Fish health and quarantine. FAO Fisheries circular. 1997:45-9. [30] Rico-Mora R, Voltolina D, Villaescusa-Celaya JA. Biological control of Vibrio alginolyticus in Skeletonema costatum (Bacillariophyceae) cultures. Aquacultural Engineering. 1998;19:1-6. [31] Cordero H, Esteban MÁ, Cuesta A. Use of probiotic bacteria against bacterial and viral infections in shellfish and fish aquaculture. Sustain Aquac Tech. 2014;8:23. [32] Dalmin G, Kathiresan K, Purushothaman A. Effect of probiotics on bacterial population and health status of shrimp in culture pond ecosystem. Indian journal of experimental biology. 2001;39:939-42. [33] Balcázar JL, De Blas I, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Cunningham D, Vendrell D, Múzquiz JL. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Veterinary microbiology. 2006;114:173-86. [34] Gomaa EZ. Chitinase production by Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus licheniformis: their potential in antifungal biocontrol. The Journal of Microbiology. 2012;50:103-11. [35] von Verschuer C. Looking from within and without: Ancient and Medieval External Relations. Monumenta Nipponica. 2000;55:537-66. [36] Chandregowda V, Venkateswara Rao G, Chandrasekara Reddy G. Convergent approach for commercial synthesis of gefitinib and erlotinib. Organic Process Research & Development. 2007;11:813-6. [37] Kolndadacha O, Adikwu I, Okaeme A, Atiribom R, Mohammed A, Musa Y. The role of probiotics in aquaculture in Nigeria-a review. Continental Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 2011;5:8-15. [38] Masitoh MM, Hariati A, Fadjar M. Antimicrobial Activity of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis on Pathogenic Vibrio harveyi in Litopenaeus vannamei. 2016. [39] Murillo I, Villamil L. Bacillus cereus and Bacillus subtilis used as probiotics in rotifer(Brachionus plicatilis) cultures. Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development. 2011. [40] Rodgers C, Furones M. Antimicrobial agents in aquaculture: practice, needs and issues. Options Méditerranéennes. 2009;86:41-59.
AC C
353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table1 optical density variation of indigo in reared seawater of C.gigas under different conditions: Aquarium 2: C. gigas, seawater and indigo (1.74 mg/ml); Aquarium 3: C. gigas, seawater and previously degraded indigo using Bacillus consortium; Aquarium 4: Same content as the second aquarium but inoculated with Bacillus
RI PT
consortium (10 ml of Bacillus suspension 1012 CFU/ml).
Day1
Day2
Aquarium 2
0.1200±0,003
0.0700±0.003
Aquarium 3
0.0270±0,001
0.0070±0.001
74.0854±1,470
Aquarium 4
0.1260±0,003
0.0129±<0.001
89.7552±0,144
41.4377±4,550
SC
M AN U TE D EP AC C
Decolorization
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 1 : Percentage of decolorization of reared seawater under different conditions: Aquarium 2: C. gigas, seawater and indigo (1.74 mg/ml); Aquarium 3: C. gigas, seawater and previously degraded indigo using Bacillus consortium; Aquarium 4: Same content as
TE D
the second aquarium but inoculated with Bacillus consortium (10 ml of Bacillus
AC C
EP
suspension 1012 CFU/ml). Bars represent the SD for each point.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 2: Bacillus Protection of heamocytes of Crassostrea gigas reared in seawater
AC C
EP
TE D
contaminated with indigo. 1; 2;....7: Aquarium number. Bars represent the SD for each point.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT HIGHLIGHTS •
Bacillus sp used as safe probiotic
•
Vibrio harveyi is widespread in aquaculture
•
Indigo is a strongly toxic dyes
•
Bacillus sp had an effect on immunity and resistance to Vibrio harveyi of Crassostrea gigas reared in
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
indigo polluted seawater