Culture conditions improvement of Crassostrea gigas using a potential probiotic Bacillus sp strain

Culture conditions improvement of Crassostrea gigas using a potential probiotic Bacillus sp strain

Accepted Manuscript Culture conditions improvement of Crassostrea gigas using a potential probiotic Bacillus sp strain Kais Fdhila, Najla Haddaji, Ibt...

838KB Sizes 0 Downloads 14 Views

Accepted Manuscript Culture conditions improvement of Crassostrea gigas using a potential probiotic Bacillus sp strain Kais Fdhila, Najla Haddaji, Ibtissem Chakroun, Amel Dhiaf, Mohammed Ezz Edine Macherki, Bochra Khouildi, Faouzi Lamari, Kamel Chaieb, Nabil Abid, Hajer Marzougui, Sadok Khouadja, Hechmi Missaoui PII:

S0882-4010(16)30899-3

DOI:

10.1016/j.micpath.2017.07.017

Reference:

YMPAT 2355

To appear in:

Microbial Pathogenesis

Received Date: 18 December 2016 Revised Date:

10 July 2017

Accepted Date: 10 July 2017

Please cite this article as: Fdhila K, Haddaji N, Chakroun I, Dhiaf A, Edine Macherki ME, Khouildi B, Lamari F, Chaieb K, Abid N, Marzougui H, Khouadja S, Missaoui H, Culture conditions improvement of Crassostrea gigas using a potential probiotic Bacillus sp strain, Microbial Pathogenesis (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.07.017. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Culture conditions improvement of Crassostrea gigas using a potential probiotic

2

Bacillus sp strain

3

Kais Fdhilaa, Najla Haddaji*a, Ibtissem Chakrouna, Amel Dhiafa, , Mohammed Ezz Edine

4

Macherkia, Bochra Khouildib., Faouzi Lamaria, Kamel Chaieba, Nabil Abida, Hajer

5

Marzouguib, Sadok Khouadjaa, Hechmi Missaouib.

6

a

7

Monastir.

8

b

Fisheries Laboratory, Higher Institute of Agriculture Tunis.

SC

9

RI PT

Laboratory of Analysis, Treatment and Valorization of pollutants Faculty of Pharmacy of

10 11

M AN U

12 13 14

⁎ Corresponding author:

16

Najla Haddaji

17

Laboratory of Analysis, Treatment and Valorization of Pollutants of the Environment and

18

Products (LATVPEP).

19

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Monastir. Monastir 5000. Tunisia

20

Tel.: (+216)73466244

21

Fax: (+216) 73461830

22

E-mail address: [email protected].

24 25 26 27

EP

AC C

23

TE D

15

28 29 30 31 32 33 1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract

35

It is well demonstrated that some probiotics improve rearing water quality and thereby have

36

beneficial effects on reared organisms. We conducted this study to determine the effect of

37

Bacillus consortium on Crassostrea gigas reared in contemned seawater with indigo dye

38

priory treated with Bacillus or no treated. This effect was studied by assessing hemocytes

39

death using flow cytometry analysis. We found that the percentage of decolorization of

40

indigo dye in polluted seawater in presence of C. gigas increased from 41% to 90% when

41

using Bacillus consortium. In these conditions, the hemocytes mortality of reared C. gigas

42

decreased from 87% to 56%. We have demonstrated also that seawater contemned with

43

priory treated indigo with Bacillus consortium is less toxic than seawater contemned with

44

the no treated indigo. The percentage of hemocytes death is 81% for the contemned seawater

45

with indigo and 56% for no contemned seawater. This consortium shows a protector effect

46

of C. gigas against Vibrio harveyi contemning reared seawater.

47

Key words: Crassostrea gigas, Bacillus consortium, indigo.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

34

48 49 50

54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61

EP

53

AC C

52

TE D

51

62 63 64 65 66 2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 67

1. Introduction Most of pollutants are thrown out on soil and get washed off during monsoon months and

69

are thereby conducted to lagoons and coastal seawater. They lead to ecological and sanitary

70

problems such as the decrease of aquatic biodiversity and the intoxication of aquatic

71

organisms particularly filter feeders like oysters. The world annual production of dyes is

72

estimated at more than 80000 tons used mainly in food industries, cosmetics, paper mills

73

and especially in textile industries which absorb alone more than 70% of the produced total

74

quantity [1]. The intense use of the synthetic dyes in these various industries generates

75

sources of considerable pollution of the environment. Indeed, 10 to 15% of the quantity of

76

dyes used is rejected into the natural environment [2]. These dyes, in addition to dangerous

77

pollution that they can generate, constitute because of their toxicity a potential danger to

78

both humans and environment [3]. Since the very early stages of the history of mankind,

79

several natural dyestuffs have been used. In fact, the art of dyeing with indigo dates back

80

several thousand years. The Indigo is classified as strongly toxic dyes [4]. The indigo can

81

cause a major problem for aquaculture in general and particularly in Crassostrea gigas.

82

The Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas is one of the most important cultured species, with a

83

high value and strong market demand [5]. Oyster farming practices usually include

84

numerous transfers of oysters at all life stages, especially of spat and juveniles grown in

85

hatchery and nursery systems before being transferred to oyster farming areas in open

86

seawater [6]. Along with these farming practices, oysters must adapt to new abiotic and

87

biotic environments. Biotic changes include interactions with new, potentially pathogenic or

88

toxic microorganisms that infect oysters through the feeding and filtration process. The most

89

important factor affecting aquaculture is the incidence of microbial pathologies, mainly

90

bacterial in origin. Vibrio harveyi, and Vibrio anguillarum are most frequently isolated

91

marine Vibrio species [7] [8], having been associated with large-scale losses of larval and

92

juvenile penaeids [9] and also causing several opportunistic diseases to fishes [10] [11].

93

Vibrios are gram-negative, ubiquitous in marine and estuarine ecosystems as well as

94

aquaculture farms, and comprise one of the major microbiota of these ecosystems. Many

95

vibrios are serious pathogens for animals reared in aquaculture [12] [13]. Vibriosis, caused

96

by infection by Vibrio spp, is one of the most prevalent diseases in fishes and other

97

aquaculture-reared organisms and is widely responsible for mortality in cultured aquaculture

98

systems worldwide [14] [15].

99

Disease outbreaks in shellfish aquaculture are managed using methods such as disease

100

avoidance, frequent water changes, good husbandry, and the use of immune-stimulants and

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

68

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT antibiotics [16]. Antibiotics have been used widely in aquaculture systems as a method for

102

disease control. However, because of the emergence of antibiotic resistance and concerns

103

about environmental pollution, alternatives to the use of antibiotics are needed [17], [18].

104

One of these alternative methods is the use of nonpathogenic microorganisms called

105

probiotics. Bacillus sp. is widely used as probiotic in aquaculture but it is not autochthonous

106

in gastrointestinal tract. However, it may be active during intestinal transit [19]. In a recent

107

study, two marine bacteria, Bacillus pumilus RI0695 and Phaeobacter gallaeciensis were

108

previously reported to provide significant protection of the Eastern oyster larvae

109

Crassostreae virginica when challenged with the shellfish pathogen Vibrio tubiashii [20].

110

Additionally, Bacillus sp. had been shown to have health benefits for Dicentrachus labrax

111

larvaes [21]. Probiotics have been tested successfully in shellfish culture. Chniti et al. (2003)

112

[22] isolated two yeasts and one bacterial strain (designated SS1, AY1, and SY9, resp.) from

113

the digestive tract of abalone (Haliotis midae). A diet was formulated with a mixture of the

114

three putative probiotics. Each probiont was added to the feed to achieve a final

115

concentration of approximately 107 cells g−1 of dry feed. The growth rate of small (20 mm)

116

and large (67 mm) abalone was improved by 8% and 34%, respectively, in eight months

117

cultures. Furthermore, abalones supplemented with probiotics had a survival rate of 62% to

118

the pathogenic bacterium Vibrio anguillarum compared to 25% survival of untreated

119

animals. Another study describes that the daily application of Phaeobacter inhibens and B.

120

pumillus RI06-95 mixed with algal feed to culture tanks in the hatchery increased survival of

121

oyster larvae to experimental challenge with V. coralliilyticus RE22 [23]. Probiotic

122

microorganisms have the ability to release chemical substances with bactericidal or

123

bacteriostatic effect on pathogenic bacteria that are in the intestine of the host, thus

124

constituting a barrier against the proliferation of opportunistic pathogens. In general, the

125

antibacterial effect is due to one or more of the following factors: production of antibiotics,

126

bacteriocins, siderophores, enzymes (lysozymes, proteases) and/or hydrogen peroxide, as

127

well as alteration of the intestinal pH due to the generation of organic acids [18]. According

128

to these data, the genus Bacillus is one of dominant probiotics, which was commonly used in

129

aquaculture. More and more studies confirmed that endogenous or exogenous Bacillus

130

strains could be effective in improving growth, immunity and disease resistance of shellfish

131

[24] [25] [20].

132

This study thus investigated the possible protection effect of Bacillus sp for Crassostrea

133

gigas reared in indigo polluted seawater and infected with Vibrio Harvey.

134

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

101

2. Materials and methods 4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 135

2.1.Samples collection and bacterial characterization Three Bacillus strains, isolated from Tunisian hypersaline environments in a previous study

137

in our laboratory [26], are used in this study as Bacillus consortium. Sequencing analyses

138

showed that these bacteria corresponded to the genus Bacillus sp such as Bacillus subtilis, B.

139

cereus, B. coagulans [26]. These strains were preserved in our laboratory and their purity

140

was routinely checked. Stock cultures were stored at 80°C in powdered skimmed milk

141

suspension with 25% glycerol. Bacillus strains were isolated, in this study, on nutrient plates

142

and inoculated in nutrient broth prepared with seawater. It was incubated for 24 hours at

143

20°C [27].

144

Vibrio harveyi ATCC 14126 was routinely cultured in marine broth. It is used for control as

145

positive pathogen.

SC

RI PT

136

2.2.Screening and identification of micro-organisms with bioremediation activity

147

Indigo was submitted to decimal dilution in a mineral liquid medium (MLM) prepared as

148

described previously by [28] up to a concentration of 1.75 mg/ml.

149

Isolated bacteria from sludge and wastewater of industrial textile plant were inoculated in

150

flasks containing MlM medium with 1.75 mg/ml indigo dye concentration. Then flasks were

151

incubated at 37°C under shaking conditions (120 rpm) in a rotary shaker. Samples were

152

collected at different time to determine decolorization. Optical densities (OD) were

153

determined using a spectrophotometer, Shimadzu UV-240I PC model Kyoto, Japan) at the

154

max λ max 664 nm. The percentage of decolorization was calculated as following:

155

decolorization (%) = [absorbance at t0 – absorbance at t1] * 100/ absorbance at t0.

TE D

2.3.Oysters challenge

EP

156

M AN U

146

Crassortrea gigas were purchased from a rearing plant in a lagoon after an acclimatization

158

period of one week at 25°C in aquariums containing 10 liters of seawater. Experiments were

159

carried out in six aquariums, each containing six specimens.

160

Aquarium 1 : containing C. gigas and seawater; Aquarium 2: containing C. gigas, seawater

161

and indigo (1.74 mg/ml); Aquarium 3: containing C. gigas, seawater and filtrate from a

162

culture of Bacillus consortium where indigo was degraded; Aquarium 4: Same content as

163

the second aquarium but reared seawater is inoculated with Bacillus consortium (10 ml of

164

Bacillus suspension 106 CFU/ml); Aquarium 5: seawater inoculated with Bacillus

165

consortium (10 ml of Bacillus suspension 106 CFU/ml); Aquarium 6: the same content as

166

the fifth aquarium but oysters are infected with V. harveyi ATCC 14126; Aquarium 7: the

167

same content as the sixth aquarium but oysters are infected with V. harveyi ATCC 14126and

168

added with Bacillus consortium (10 ml of Bacillus suspension 106 CFU/ml).

AC C

157

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 169

2.4.Hemolymph collection C. gigas was collected from the lagoon of Bizerte (Tunisia). It is polluted with industrial and

171

domestic wastewater.

172

Hemolymph was collected from the adductor muscle following Chen method (1996). A

173

notch was filed on the dorsal side of the shell valve, adjacent to the adductor muscle. 2ml of

174

hemolymph were collected aseptically from each animal.

175

A total of 10 000 hemocytes were analyzed using a flow cytometer BD FAC Caliber

176

coupled with a Power Mac G3PC equipped with a Cell Quest Pro software

177

RI PT

170

2.5.Hemocytes viability assay

150 µl of hemolymph was mixed with 150 µl of an antiaggregant solution (AASH) and 5 ml

179

of propidium iodide 1mg/l (PI) (Sigma) at a final concentration of 20µg/ml. The Propodium

180

iodide binds to DNA double stranded and absorbs at wavelength above 630 nm. It enters and

181

stains the cells but can’t cross the membrane of viable cells. Tubes were incubated with PI

182

and AASH for 10 minutes at 20°C before analysis. Dead hemocytes are more fluorescent in

183

flow cytometer’s orange light detector.

184

We evaluate the percentage of dead heamocytes in proportion to the total number. 2.6. Statistical analysis

M AN U

185

SC

178

Past 3.05 and Graphpad prism 6.05 softwares are used for statistical analysis and graphics.

187

For all tests we used hypothetical risk α= 0.05 for alternative hypothesis acceptance. Bar

188

chartwas plotted with standard deviation show.

TE D

186

3. Results

190

3.1.Screening and identification of bacterial strains decolorizing indigo dye

EP

189

More than 1500 biomasses from textile wastewater and sludge were tested for their ability to

192

decolorize diluted indigo dye. Active strains associated with these biomasses were

193

identified. Gram negative rods shape bacteria and some Gram positive bacteria were

194

selected. Gram negative rods as Pseudomonas stutzeri ; Pseudomonas testosteroni;

195

Pseudomonas

196

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Sphingomonas paucimobilis; Aeromonas hydrophila. And for

197

Gram positive bacteria, we identified Staphylococcus epidermidi and Bacillus subtilis.We

198

have been interested to Bacillus sp strains.

199

AC C

191

vesicularis ;

Pseudomonasmaltophilia ;

Pseudomonas

acidovorans;

3.2.Biodegradation of indigo by Bacillus consortium

200

The percentage of decolorization of indigo dye in polluted seawater in presence of C. gigas

201

increased from 41% to 90% (Table 1, Aquarium 4) when using Bacillus consortium. These

202

bacteria can survive in seawater because of their sporulation characteristics. In the absence 6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT of Bacillus consortium, C. gigas and seawater microflora, the percentage of decolorized

204

indigo is 41% (Table 1, Aquarium 2).

205

The Bacillus consortium has also improved the seawater quality of the aquarium

206

contaminated with the previous product of indigo degradation: In aquarium 3, the percentage

207

of decolorization was 74 %. Treated C. gigas with indigo in aquarium 2 accumulated this

208

dye in its gills. This can have a harmful effect on consumers’ health. Table1 shows optical

209

density variation of indigo in reared seawater of C.gigas under different conditions.

210

RI PT

203

3.3.Crassostrea gigas hemocytes protection by Bacillus consortium

Rearing seawater of the aquarium 1 and 5 is not contaminated with indigo dye so a low

212

mortality of haemocytes was obtained in the aquarium1 and no mortality in the aquarium 5.

213

We found that the indigo dye is very toxic for C. gigas and the mortality of haemocytes

214

increased in the aquarium 2 c contaminated with diluted indigo from1.2 aqua. (1) up to 87%

215

(aqua.2).

216

Rearing seawater contaminated with treated indigo using Bacillus consortium is less toxic to

217

C. gigas than that contaminated with untreated indigo. When added to contemned seawater

218

with indigo, Bacillus consortium decreased the hemocytes mortality of reared C. gigas from

219

87% to 56% (fig.1: Aquarium 2 and 4). It has also a protecting effect against pathogenic

220

bacteria V. harveyi ATCC 14126. Less mortality is obtained in the aqu.6 containing Bacillus

221

consortium than in the aqua.7. 4. Dicussion

M AN U

TE D

222

SC

211

Effluent from the textile industry is loaded of non-biodegradable dyes which make them

224

difficult to apply biological treatments. Several techniques have been employed to remove

225

dyes from wastewater. These effluents have an impact on aquaculture. Aquaculture is a fast-

226

growing food production sector and the use of probiotics for the improvement of aquatic

227

environmental quality as major areas for further research in disease control in aquaculture

228

[29], which would help to reduce the use of antimicrobial agents. However, the addition of

229

probiotics is now also a common practice in commercial shrimp hatcheries in Mexico [30].

230

The most studied probiotics are usually Bacillus and Lactobacillus species [31]. It has been

231

reported that use of Bacillus sp. improved water quality, survival and growth rates, increased

232

the health status of juvenile Penaeus monodon and reduced the pathogenic vibrios [32].

233

Indeed, the probiotic effect of Bacillus sp was reported under in vitro and in vivo condition

234

[33].

235

Bacillus strains isolated from lagoons can survive in seawater because of their tolerance to

236

high pH. It was found that they prefer pH>8.9. They also tolerate high salinity because of

AC C

EP

223

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT their origin: they were isolated from lagoons having a high salinity level [26]. These bacteria

238

can survive in seawater because of their sporulation characteristics. This Bacillus

239

consortium is as active as rot white fungi [34] but fungi need low pH and special nutrients to

240

grow. Experiences conducted by von Verschuer (2000) [35] to improve seawater quality

241

using Bacillus, had shown that they can easily multiply in seawater. So, Bacillus strains can

242

be used in rearing media of aquatic organisms like filter feeds. When added to rearing water

243

and is generally more effective in converting organic matter back to CO2 than Gram negative

244

bacilli. Venkateswara et al.(2007) [36] had reported that microorganisms with probiotic

245

effect can regulate microflora and improve the chemical quality of the water by

246

decomposing pollutants, minimizing the toxic gases like NH3, N2O, H2O2. According to

247

Kolndadacha et al. (2011) [37], Bacillus consortium improves water quality and increases

248

heamocytes viability from 56% to 87% when added to rearing water of C.gigas. It can be

249

considered as potential probiotic in rearing water of aquatic organisms. The percentage of

250

decolorization of indigo dye in polluted seawater in presence of C. gigas increased from

251

41% to 90% (Table 1, Aquarium 4) when using Bacillus consortium. Our results showed

252

that indigo biodegradation products are harmless for C. gigas and decrease haemocytes

253

mortality. Bacillus consortium is efficient in seawater control when added to the rearing

254

medium. Mahdhi at al. (2007) [26] found similar results during Dicentrarchus labrax

255

treatment by Bacillus. Bacillus strains isolated and used in this study may have an

256

interesting antagonistic activity against pathogens. They have biomedical and antibacterial

257

effects. In addition, they can be easily used in rearing seawater areas. These sporuling

258

bacteria can resist to hostile conditions. In this investigation, we have shown that Bacillus

259

sp. strains isolated from industrial textile waste water are able to degrade indigo. The

260

optimization of their biodegradation activity in mixture showed that they need high pH and

261

can be used in seawater. Experiments performed in rearing seawater of C. gigas with

262

previously biodegraded indigo product water condition using Bacillus biomass show that

263

indigo is more toxic for C. gigas and leads to higher haemocytes mortality rates than water

264

contaminated with previously biodegraded indigo product.

265

These strains have no toxic effect on C. gigas. No haemocytes mortality occurred in our

266

assays. Similar results were found by Mahdhi et al. (2010) [26]. Bacillus consortium

267

selected in our study, showed an antagonism effect against fish and shellfish pathogens [26].

268

These results are in concordance with previous studies showed that B. cereus and B.

269

thuringiensis mixture treatment resulted in survival rate of 100%, compared with 75% in the

270

treatment without Bacillus. Authors concluded that B. cereus and B. thuringiensis have

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

237

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT potential applications for controlling pathogenic V. harveyi in shrimp aquaculture [38].

272

Furthermore, it was observed that the addition of B. subtilis to the rotifer culture water

273

resulted in a significant increase in rotifer numbers and a reduction of Vibrio levels. B.

274

subtilis appears to be a promising probiotic for rotifer cultures [39].

275

Uncontrolled effect of antibiotics, their bad use and their high coast lead us to us to propose

276

Bacillus consortium as an alternative substitute to antibiotics [40]. Several commercial

277

consortia of probiotics (Bacillus or nitrifying bacteria) such as "Biostar"; BRF-1A; BRF 13

278

A; Pond PrO-Vc are used to improve water quality and animal health. Experiments

279

performed in C. gigas rearing seawater show that indigo is more toxic for C.gigas and lead

280

to a higher haemocyte mortality rate than water contaminated with priory biodegradated

281

indigo product. Bacillus consortium added to contaminated seawater with indigo improves

282

seawater quality and results in a lower hemocytes mortality rate. It was reported that a

283

commercially prepared bacterial mixture of Bacillus spp. mixed into the rearing water

284

increased survival and production of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) [33]. Currently

285

there are no commercially available probiotics for shellfish aquaculture. Recent study

286

describes efforts to create a stable formulation of B. pumilus RI0695 for delivery at shellfish

287

hatcheries [20] [23]. Some effort to create a lyophilized probiotic formulation of P.

288

gallaeciensis that provides reduced mortality of C. virginica larvae when exposed to the

289

shellfish pathogen V. tubiashii RE22 [20].

SC

M AN U

5. Conclusion

TE D

290

RI PT

271

In this investigation, we have shown that three strains of Bacillus sp. isolates are able to

292

degrade indigo.

293

Experiments performed in rearing seawater showed that Bacillus consortium added to

294

contaminated seawater with indigo dye or with Vibrio harvey improves seawater quality and

295

results in lower haemocytes mortality rates.

296

Rearing seawater contemned with indigo product is more toxic for C. gigas and leads to

297

higher haemocyte mortality rates than water contaminated with previously biodegraded

298

indigo product.

299

Conflict of interest

300

No conflicts of interests exist.

301

Acknowledgement

302

We thank all the members of both laboratories for their collaboration.

303

References

AC C

EP

291

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

[1] Zollinger H. Color chemistry: syntheses, properties, and applications of organic dyes and pigments: John Wiley & Sons; 2003. [2] Cooper P. Colour in dyehouse effluent: Society of dyers and colourists; 1995. [3] Anliker R. Ecotoxicology of dyestuffs—a joint effort by industry. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 1979;3:59-74. [4] Mittal A, Mittal J, Kurup L. Batch and bulk removal of hazardous dye, indigo carmine from wastewater through adsorption. Journal of hazardous materials. 2006;137:591-602. [5] Castagna M, Gibbons M, Kurkowski K. Culture: application. The eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica Maryland Sea Grant, College Park, Maryland. 1996:675-90. [6] Helm MM, Bourne N, Lovatelli A. Hatchery culture of bivalves: a practical manual: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations; 2004. [7] Arias C, Macián M, Aznar R, Garay E, Pujalte M. Low incidence of Vibrio vulnificus among Vibrio isolates from sea water and shellfish of the western Mediterranean coast. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 1999;86:125-34. [8] Frans I, Michiels CW, Bossier P, Willems K, Lievens B, Rediers H. Vibrio anguillarum as a fish pathogen: virulence factors, diagnosis and prevention. Journal of fish diseases. 2011;34:643-61. [9] Diggles B, Moss G, Carson J, Anderson C. Luminous vibriosis in rock lobster Jasus verreauxi (Decapoda: Palinuridae) phyllosoma larvae associated with infection by Vibrio harveyi. Diseases of aquatic organisms. 2000;43:127-37. [10] Hispano C, Nebra Y, Blanch AR. Isolation of Vibrio harveyi from an ocular lesion in the short sunfish (Mola mola). Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists (United Kingdom). 1997. [11] Alcaide E, Gil-Sanz C, Sanjuan E, Esteve D, Amaro C, Silveira L. Vibrio harveyi causes disease in seahorse, Hippocampus sp. Journal of Fish Diseases. 2001;24:311-3. [12] Austin B, Austin D. Vibriosis, Bacterial fish pathogens and disease i n farmed wild fish. Chapter. 1993;13:263-87. [13] Bergh Ø, Nilsen F, Samuelsen OB. Diseases, prophylaxis and treatment of the Atlantic halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus: a review. Diseases of Aquatic organisms. 2001;48:5774. [14] Lavilla-Pitogo CR, Leaño EM, Paner MG. Mortalities of pond-cultured juvenile shrimp, Penaeus monodon, associated with dominance of luminescent vibrios in the rearing environment. Aquaculture. 1998;164:337-49. [15] Chen F-R, Liu P-C, Lee K-K. Lethal attribute of serine protease secreted by Vibrio alginolyticus strains in kuruma prawn Penaeus japonicus. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C. 2000;55:94-9. [16] Elston RA, Ford SE. Shellfish diseases and health management. Shellfish aquaculture and the environment. 2011:359-94. [17] Austin B. Antibiotic pollution from fish farms: effects on aquatic microflora. Microbiological Sciences. 1984;2:113-7. [18] Verschuere L, Rombaut G, Sorgeloos P, Verstraete W. Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews. 2000;64:65571. [19] Gatesoupe F. The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture. 1999;180:147-65. [20] Dao CA. Chemical investigation of candidate probiotics in aquaculture and formulation of a probiotic agent for oyster larviculure: University of Rhode Island; 2015. [21] Mahdhi A, Kamoun F, Messina C, Bakhrouf A. Probiotic properties of Brevibacillus brevis and its influence on sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larval rearing. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2012;6:6487-95.

AC C

304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

[22] Macey B, Coyne V. Improved growth rate and disease resistance in farmed Haliotis midae through probiotic treatment. Aquaculture. 2005;245:249-61. [23] Sohn S. Evaluation of the efficacy of candidate probiotics for disease prevention in shellfish hatcheries: University of Rhode Island; 2016. [24] Karim M, Zhao W, Rowley D, Nelson D, Gomez-Chiarri M. Probiotic Strains for Shellfish Aquaculture: Protection of Eastern Oyster, Crassostrea virginica, Larvae and Juveniles Againsl Bacterial Challenge. Journal of Shellfish Research. 2013;32:401-8. [25] Nemutanzhela ME, Roets Y, Gardiner N, Lalloo R. The use and benefits of Bacillus based biological agents in aquaculture. Sustainable Aquaculture Techniques: Intech; 2014. [26] Mahdhi A, Harbi B, Esteban MÁ, Chaieb K, Kamoun F, Bakhrouf A. Using mixture design to construct consortia of potential probiotic Bacillus strains to protect gnotobiotic Artemia against pathogenic Vibrio. Biocontrol science and technology. 2010;20:983-96. [27] Cabo M, Murado M, González MP, Pastoriza L. A method for bacteriocin quantification. Journal of applied microbiology. 1999;87:907-14. [28] Chniti N, Chriaa J, Dhief A, Bakhrouf A. Biodegradation of indigo and textile wastewater by acclimated biomasses. Journal Européen d'Hydrologie (France). 2003. [29] Subasinghe R. Fish health and quarantine. FAO Fisheries circular. 1997:45-9. [30] Rico-Mora R, Voltolina D, Villaescusa-Celaya JA. Biological control of Vibrio alginolyticus in Skeletonema costatum (Bacillariophyceae) cultures. Aquacultural Engineering. 1998;19:1-6. [31] Cordero H, Esteban MÁ, Cuesta A. Use of probiotic bacteria against bacterial and viral infections in shellfish and fish aquaculture. Sustain Aquac Tech. 2014;8:23. [32] Dalmin G, Kathiresan K, Purushothaman A. Effect of probiotics on bacterial population and health status of shrimp in culture pond ecosystem. Indian journal of experimental biology. 2001;39:939-42. [33] Balcázar JL, De Blas I, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Cunningham D, Vendrell D, Múzquiz JL. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Veterinary microbiology. 2006;114:173-86. [34] Gomaa EZ. Chitinase production by Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus licheniformis: their potential in antifungal biocontrol. The Journal of Microbiology. 2012;50:103-11. [35] von Verschuer C. Looking from within and without: Ancient and Medieval External Relations. Monumenta Nipponica. 2000;55:537-66. [36] Chandregowda V, Venkateswara Rao G, Chandrasekara Reddy G. Convergent approach for commercial synthesis of gefitinib and erlotinib. Organic Process Research & Development. 2007;11:813-6. [37] Kolndadacha O, Adikwu I, Okaeme A, Atiribom R, Mohammed A, Musa Y. The role of probiotics in aquaculture in Nigeria-a review. Continental Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 2011;5:8-15. [38] Masitoh MM, Hariati A, Fadjar M. Antimicrobial Activity of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis on Pathogenic Vibrio harveyi in Litopenaeus vannamei. 2016. [39] Murillo I, Villamil L. Bacillus cereus and Bacillus subtilis used as probiotics in rotifer(Brachionus plicatilis) cultures. Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development. 2011. [40] Rodgers C, Furones M. Antimicrobial agents in aquaculture: practice, needs and issues. Options Méditerranéennes. 2009;86:41-59.

AC C

353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table1 optical density variation of indigo in reared seawater of C.gigas under different conditions: Aquarium 2: C. gigas, seawater and indigo (1.74 mg/ml); Aquarium 3: C. gigas, seawater and previously degraded indigo using Bacillus consortium; Aquarium 4: Same content as the second aquarium but inoculated with Bacillus

RI PT

consortium (10 ml of Bacillus suspension 1012 CFU/ml).

Day1

Day2

Aquarium 2

0.1200±0,003

0.0700±0.003

Aquarium 3

0.0270±0,001

0.0070±0.001

74.0854±1,470

Aquarium 4

0.1260±0,003

0.0129±<0.001

89.7552±0,144

41.4377±4,550

SC

M AN U TE D EP AC C

Decolorization

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 1 : Percentage of decolorization of reared seawater under different conditions: Aquarium 2: C. gigas, seawater and indigo (1.74 mg/ml); Aquarium 3: C. gigas, seawater and previously degraded indigo using Bacillus consortium; Aquarium 4: Same content as

TE D

the second aquarium but inoculated with Bacillus consortium (10 ml of Bacillus

AC C

EP

suspension 1012 CFU/ml). Bars represent the SD for each point.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 2: Bacillus Protection of heamocytes of Crassostrea gigas reared in seawater

AC C

EP

TE D

contaminated with indigo. 1; 2;....7: Aquarium number. Bars represent the SD for each point.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT HIGHLIGHTS •

Bacillus sp used as safe probiotic



Vibrio harveyi is widespread in aquaculture



Indigo is a strongly toxic dyes



Bacillus sp had an effect on immunity and resistance to Vibrio harveyi of Crassostrea gigas reared in

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

indigo polluted seawater