Decoding a Salmonella Typhi Regulatory Network that Controls Typhoid Toxin Expression within Human Cells

Decoding a Salmonella Typhi Regulatory Network that Controls Typhoid Toxin Expression within Human Cells

Article Decoding a Salmonella Typhi Regulatory Network that Controls Typhoid Toxin Expression within Human Cells Graphical Abstract Authors Casey C...

3MB Sizes 0 Downloads 38 Views

Article

Decoding a Salmonella Typhi Regulatory Network that Controls Typhoid Toxin Expression within Human Cells Graphical Abstract

Authors Casey C. Fowler, Jorge E. Gala´n

Correspondence [email protected]

In Brief Typhoid toxin, a central Salmonella Typhi virulence factor, is an unusual AB-type toxin in that it is exclusively expressed by intracellular bacteria. Here, Fowler and Gala´n develop a genetic screen and unveil the regulatory mechanisms that control typhoid toxin intracellular expression. Toxin expression requires bacterial localization within Salmonellacontaining vacuoles.

Highlights d

Developed a genetic method to probe the regulation of intracellular typhoid toxin expression

d

The PhoP/Q two-component system and SlyA activate toxin expression during infection

d

The histone-like protein H-NS silences toxin expression under non-inducing conditions

d

Toxin expression requires bacterial localization within Salmonella-containing vacuoles

Fowler & Gala´n, 2018, Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76 January 10, 2018 ª 2017 Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.12.001

Cell Host & Microbe

Article Decoding a Salmonella Typhi Regulatory Network that Controls Typhoid Toxin Expression within Human Cells Casey C. Fowler1 and Jorge E. Gala´n1,2,* 1Department

of Microbial Pathogenesis, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06536, USA Contact *Correspondence: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.12.001 2Lead

SUMMARY

Salmonella Typhi is the cause of typhoid fever, a major global health concern. An essential virulence factor of this pathogen is typhoid toxin. In contrast to most AB-type toxins, typhoid toxin is exclusively expressed by intracellular bacteria. The regulatory networks that ensure this unique gene expression pattern are unknown. Here, we developed FASTINSeq, a genome-wide screening approach to identify S. Typhi genes required for typhoid toxin expression within infected cells. We find that typhoid toxin expression is controlled by a silencing and countersilencing mechanism through the opposing actions of the PhoP/PhoQ two-component regulatory system and the histone-like protein H-NS. The screen also identified bacterial mutants that alter the proportion of intracellular S. Typhi that reside within an intravacuolar environment, which was essential for toxin expression. Collectively, these data describe a regulatory mechanism that allows a bacterial pathogen to exclusively express a virulence factor when located within a specific intracellular compartment.

INTRODUCTION Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) and the related serovar S. Paratyphi cause typhoid fever in humans, which is a major global public health concern (Dougan and Baker, 2014; Parry et al., 2002; Crump et al., 2004). An essential virulence factor for both of these typhoidal S. enterica serovars is typhoid toxin, a unique A2B5 toxin that when administered to experimental animals can reproduce many of the specific symptoms of typhoid fever (Gala´n, 2016; Song et al., 2013; Spano et al., 2008). Typhoid toxin has a unique architecture as it is composed of a pentameric (B) subunit, made up of PltB, linked to two enzymatic (A) subunits, the ADP ribosyl transferase PltA and the DNase CdtB (Song et al., 2013). A unique aspect in the biology of typhoid toxin is its exclusive production by intracellularly localized bacteria (Haghjoo and Gala´n, 2004; Spano et al., 2008). After its synthesis, typhoid toxin is secreted by a specialized

protein secretion system into the lumen of the Salmonella-containing vacuole (SCV) (Hodak and Gala´n, 2013) where it is packaged into vesicle carrier intermediates that transport it to the extracellular space (Chang et al., 2016; Spano et al., 2008). Intoxication of infected cells can only occur via autocrine or paracrine pathways. Toxin targeting to cells and its packaging into the vesicle carrier is mediated by its pentameric PltB B subunit, which interacts with specific cell surface or luminal vacuolar glycan receptors (Chang et al., 2016; Deng et al., 2014; Song et al., 2013). These receptors must have N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) as their terminal moiety, a predominant characteristic of human sialoglycans that is in contrast to sialoglycans in most other mammalian species, which are terminated in N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) (Chang et al., 2016; Deng et al., 2014). An intriguing corollary of typhoid toxin’s unique biology is that infected cells that do not express extracellular receptors for toxin uptake would be immune to the toxin and thus able to sustain toxin production without their intoxication. This could be particularly relevant during the chronic phase of S. Typhi infection when the toxin’s activity is thought to play an important role (Gala´n, 2016), a phase critical to its success as a human pathogen (Gonzalez-Escobedo et al., 2011; Gopinath et al., 2012). In this context, the coordination of toxin expression in the intracellular environment with its subsequent packaging into vesicle carrier intermediates must be central to the remarkable biology of this toxin. However, the regulatory mechanisms responsible for this coordination have not been elucidated. Although it is well established that intracellular bacterial pathogens encode virulence factors that, like typhoid toxin, are uniquely expressed within cells, less is known about the regulatory networks that ensure this pattern of gene expression. Here we report the results of a genetic screen to identify genes required for typhoid toxin gene expression during S. Typhi infection of cultured human cells. Our screen identified not only genes that control typhoid toxin gene expression, but also genes that affect the proportion of bacteria expressing the toxin. Our results show that typhoid toxin expression is controlled by a regulatory network involving a silencing and counter-silencing mechanism through the opposing actions of the PhoP/PhoQ two-component regulatory system and the histone-like protein H-NS. Furthermore, we found that toxin expression requires a specific intracellular environment that ensures its packaging into vesicle carrier intermediates.

Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018 ª 2017 Elsevier Inc. 65

Figure 1. The FAST-INSeq Method to Identify S. Typhi Mutants that Affect Typhoid Toxin Expression in Infected Human Cells (A) Schematic of the FAST-INSeq method. A random library of INSeq-compatible transposon mutants in the pltB:gfp reporter strain was used to infect Henle-407 cells for 18 hr. Bacteria from infected cells were sorted by FACS and the high and low-fluorescence pools were analyzed by INSeq. Schematic of hypothetical results in which the abundance of individual insertions transposon within genes that allow (black arrows) or prevent (red arrows) typhoid toxin expression are depicted. (B) FACS analysis of pltB:gfp in S. Typhi constitutively expressing of mCherry isolated from infected Henle-407 cells. A histogram is shown depicting the GFP fluorescence intensities of individual bacteria 18 hr post infection, with gates showing the fraction of the population exhibiting high and low levels of GFP. (C) Circular diagram showing the distribution of transposon mutants within the S. Typhi genome in the mutant library. The outer track (black) shows the full S. Typhi genome, the next two tracks (red and blue) show the distribution of genes by DNA strand, and the inner track (green) shows the distribution of transposon insertions in the library (inoculum pool) used for the screen. (D) Plot showing the normalized numbers of sequencing reads of transposon insertions within each S. Typhi gene in the inoculum pool versus the post-infection pool. Green and red dots represent genes required for chemotaxis and the function of the SPI-1 T3SS, respectively. See also Figure S1 and Tables S1–S4.

RESULTS FAST-INSeq: A Method to Identify Genes Required for Typhoid Toxin Expression within Infected Cells To dissect the regulatory circuit that controls typhoid toxin expression in S. Typhi, we developed an approach (fluorescence-activated sorting of transposon mutants coupled with insertion site sequencing: FAST-INSeq) to screen for genes necessary for the control of typhoid toxin gene expression within cultured epithelial cells (Figure 1A). To implement this approach we constructed an S. Typhi reporter strain in which the coding sequence of the typhoid toxin subunit pltB was replaced at its native genomic locus by a gene encoding superfolder GFP. To 66 Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018

test the behavior of the reporter strain, we infected cultured epithelial cells and examined the expression of the GFP reporter by a quantitative fluorescence assay. As predicted, expression of the typhoid toxin reporter was not detected when the reporter strain was grown in vitro and was highly induced following infection of cultured Henle-407 human epithelial cells (Haghjoo and Gala´n, 2004; Spano et al., 2008) (Figure S1A). To gain insight into the proportion of bacteria expressing typhoid toxin, we introduced into the S. Typhi pltB:gfp reporter strain a plasmid that constitutively expresses the red fluorescent protein mCherry (Spano et al., 2011) and determined the number of green (typhoid toxin-expressing) and red (all) bacteria in infected cells using flow cytometry. We found that a small (10%) but significant

proportion of bacteria exhibited little to no green fluorescence (Figure 1B), indicating that a subset of intracellular S. Typhi do not express typhoid toxin. We then generated a library of 200,000 insertion mutants in the S. Typhi pltB:gfp reporter strain using a mariner transposon modified to be compatible with insertion sequencing (INSeq), a method that enables monitoring the relative abundances of insertion sites in transposon mutant libraries using next-generation DNA sequencing (Gawronski et al., 2009; Goodman et al., 2009; van Opijnen et al., 2009). Henle-407 cells were infected with the pooled S. Typhi pltB:gfp transposon insertion mutant library for 18 hr, at which time the bacteria were recovered from infected cell lysates and sorted using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), an approach that has been previously used to isolate bacterial mutants with a particular gene expression profile (Valdivia and Falkow, 1996, 1997). We applied FACS to separate bacteria in which the pltB:gfp reporter was strongly induced (high-fluorescence pool) from bacteria showing little or no gfp expression (low-fluorescence pool) (Figure S1B). The distribution and abundance of transposon insertion sites in these two pools was then determined using INSeq. The central premise of this approach was that transposon insertions in genes that are important for the intracellular induction of typhoid toxin expression would disrupt pltB:gfp reporter expression and would therefore be over-represented in the low-fluorescence pool. To track the mutant population throughout the screen, we also used INSeq to quantify the transposon insertion sites in the full library (inoculum pool) as well as in the pool of mutants recovered from infected cells prior to sorting (post-infection pool). INSeq analysis of the inoculum pool showed the presence of at least two unique insertions within all but 387 of the 4,274 annotated genes of the S. Typhi genome, with an average of 20 unique insertions per gene totaling 90,000 independent insertions within coding regions (Figure 1C; Tables S1 and S2). Comparison of the composition of each of the pools across biological replicates indicated that the results were highly reproducible (Figure S1C). To benchmark our screening protocol, we first compared the mutant population in the inoculum with that of the pool of mutants recovered 18 hr post infection (hpi) (Figure 1D). We reasoned that this comparison should identify well-characterized genes expected to be necessary for S. Typhi to enter and replicate within mammalian cells. Insertion mutations in a small number of genes were over-represented in the post-infection pool. This group was primarily composed of genes involved in chemotaxis (Figure 1D and Table S3), which is in agreement with previous reports indicating that S. Typhimurium chemotaxis mutants exhibit a mild hyperinvasive phenotype (Jones et al., 1992). Insertions within a much larger number of genes (200) were recovered in significantly reduced numbers after infection, indicating a defect in their ability to invade, survive, or replicate within cultured cells (Table S4). It is noteworthy that homologs of each of these genes are present in the genome of S. Typhimurium, indicating that the fundamental mechanisms by which typhoidal and non-typhoidal salmonellae invade epithelial cells are largely conserved despite the disparate virulence properties of these pathogens. As expected, within this group were insertions within genes in the Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1), which encode a

type III secretion system (T3SS) that is required by S. Typhi to invade non-phagocytic cells (Gala´n, 2001; Gala´n and Curtiss, 1991) (Figures 1D and S1D). This system mediates bacterial entry by delivering the effector proteins SopE2 and SopB, which redundantly modulate Rho-family guanosine triphosphatase function (Gala´n, 2001). Furthermore, entry is also enhanced by the activity of the effector protein SipA, which modulates actin polymerization. As predicted by their redundant activities, insertions within sopE2 and sopB did not significantly affect the ability of S. Typhi to invade and replicate within cultured cells. In contrast, insertions within the actin-nucleating effector protein SipA was recovered in significantly lower numbers, which is consistent with its role in bacterial entry (Figure S1D). In addition to the SPI-1 T3SS, insertions within genes associated with other functions such as motility, nucleotide metabolism, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis, and cell envelope maintenance or remodeling were recovered in significantly lower numbers in the post-infection pool compared with the inoculum pool, suggesting their direct or indirect involvement in S. Typhi infection, survival, or replication within cultured cells. Collectively, these results indicate that our library had very good genome coverage and that our results were highly reproducible between replicates, and provide proof of concept for the encompassing nature of the genetic screen. Identification of S. Typhi Genes that Affect Typhoid Toxin Expression within Infected Human Cells To identify genes involved in the regulation of typhoid toxin gene expression, we used INSeq to compare the distribution and abundance of transposon insertion sites in the low- and highfluorescence pools described above (Figure 2A). Our analysis identified 14 genes in which transposon insertions were overrepresented in the low-fluorescence pool, suggesting that these genes are important for the intracellular induction of typhoid toxin expression. These genes encode transcriptional regulatory proteins (phoP, phoQ, and slyA), components of an ABC transporter (yrbD, yrbE, and yrbF), a putative flavodoxin of unknown function (yqcA), the SPI-2 T3SS effector sifA, and the magnesium transporter mgtA, as well as genes required for purine biosynthesis (purL, purF, purC, purM, and purH) (Table 1). To validate these findings, we generated S. Typhi isogenic mutant strains carrying deletions of each of the genes or pathways identified by the screen and examined the expression of pltB following infection of Henle-407 cells (Figure 2B). Deletions of slyA and the phoP-phoQ locus led to severely reduced pltB reporter expression compared with wild-type, indicating that these genes are important for the control of typhoid toxin gene expression. In contrast, deletion of the remaining genes identified in our screen had little or no effect on pltB:lacZ expression levels during infection (Figure 2B). Given that our analysis determined that induction of typhoid toxin gene expression is not uniform and that a population of S. Typhi does not express the toxin genes during infection (Figure 1B), we reasoned that some of these genes might alter the proportion of bacteria expressing typhoid toxin, which would not necessarily be evident when analyzing the average levels of gene expression in the entire population of mutant bacteria recovered from infected cells. To test this hypothesis, we examined by flow cytometry the proportion of typhoid toxin-expressing bacteria in S. Typhi Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018 67

Table 1. Genes Identified by FAST-INSeq as Important for Typhoid Toxin Expression in Infected Human Cells Gene

H.f. Insertions

H.f. Reads

L.f. Insertions

L.f. Reads

Ratioa

Gene Regulation phoP

2

4

12

358

phoQ

5

22

33

1,246

slyA

2

18

4

135

>50 >50 8

Purine Biosynthesis purF

20

189

22

1,814

10

purH

17

253

19

1,766

7

purL

35

478

29

1,644

3

purC

12

134

10

445

3

purM

16

151

13

483

3

YrbDEF Transporter yrbE

10

52

5

340

7

yrbF

10

101

5

410

4

yrbD

17

214

10

677

3

Other 7

87

4

555

6

sifA

14

129

6

581

5

mgtA

13

51

8

237

5

yqcA

a

Ratio of normalized INSeq sequencing reads from transposon insertions within the indicated gene in the low-fluorescence (L.f.) pool compared with the high-fluorescence (H.f.) pool.

Figure 2. Identification of S. Typhi Genes that Affect Typhoid Toxin Expression in Infected Cells (A) Plot showing the normalized numbers of sequencing reads of transposon insertions within each S. Typhi gene in the high-fluorescence versus the lowfluorescence pools. Open and black circles represent genes required for biotin biosynthesis or that were over-represented in the low-fluorescence pool, respectively. (B) Expression of the pltB:lacZ reporter in wild-type (WT) S. Typhi and the indicated isogenic mutant strains. The levels of b-galactosidase activity in the inoculum and in bacteria isolated from infected cells were normalized by the number of colony-forming units (CFU). Values represent the mean ± SD for three independent determinations. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences from the wild-type control (**p < 0.001, *p < 0.05; n.s.s., not statistically significant). (C) FACS analysis of typhoid toxin expression of the indicated S. Typhi strains 18 hr post infection. Histograms show the GFP fluorescence intensities of individual bacteria, with gates showing high- and low-fluorescence populations. Data for the wild-type sample, also shown in Figure 1B, is presented again for clarity. See also Figures S2 and S6; Table S5.

mutant strains expressing the pltB:gfp reporter and mCherry under a constitutive promoter (Figure 2C). We found that, as expected, pltB:gfp expression was not detectable above 68 Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018

background in the DphoP-phoQ mutant strain. In the DslyA mutant strain, the fraction of S. Typhi that expressed the toxin reporter was similar to wild-type, but the population that expressed the toxin exhibited an 10-fold reduction in GFP levels compared with wild-type. This phenotype suggested that slyA is not important for determining whether or not typhoid toxin is expressed, but is important for achieving high levels of induction in toxin-expressing S. Typhi. In contrast, we found that the DyrbE mutation resulted in a substantial increase in the fraction of S. Typhi that did not express the typhoid toxin reporter during infection compared with wild-type. Importantly, however, the GFP levels observed for the toxin-expressing population were indistinguishable from wild-type. These results indicate that our screen identified mutants that result in decreased levels of typhoid toxin expression as well as mutants that affect the proportion of S. Typhi that express the toxin genes during infection. The FAST-INSeq screen also identified several mutants that were under-represented in the low-fluorescence pool compared with the high-fluorescence pool, suggesting that these mutants might promote typhoid toxin expression (Figure 2A and Table S5). The strongest such phenotypes were observed for the five genes encoding enzymes required for the biosynthesis of biotin, an enzyme co-factor that is required for the synthesis of fatty acids (Streit and Entcheva, 2003). While transposon insertions in each of these genes were very well represented in the high-fluorescence pool, they were essentially absent from the low-fluorescence pool, suggesting that disruption of biotin biosynthesis significantly affects the population of S. Typhi that

does not express the toxin genes during infection (Table S5 and Figure 2A). To verify this observation, we introduced a DbioB mutation into the S. Typhi pltB:gfp reporter strain and examined typhoid toxin expression at the single-bacterium level following infection using flow cytometry. Consistent with the results of the screen, we found that the population of bacteria that do not express pltB:gfp during infection was essentially absent in the DbioB mutant (Figure 2C). However, the DbioB mutant did not affect the fluorescence intensity of the toxin-expressing population, nor did it affect the average level of expression of a pltB:lacZ reporter during infection (Figures 2C and S2A). Furthermore, biotin depletion did not increase pltB:lacZ expression in bacteria grown under in vitro (non-inducing) conditions, indicating that biotin starvation does not stimulate typhoid toxin expression (Figures S2B and S2C). These results indicate that mutations that prevent biotin biosynthesis eliminate the population of S. Typhi that does not express typhoid toxin during infection, but does not directly affect typhoid toxin expression. Taken together, our genetic screen identified genes that are required for the expression of typhoid toxin and genes that affect the proportion of S. Typhi that express typhoid toxin. The Two-Component System PhoP/PhoQ and the Regulatory Protein SlyA Activate the Expression of Typhoid Toxin during S. Typhi Infection of Cultured Epithelial Cells Our genetic screen identified the PhoP/PhoQ (PhoPQ) twocomponent regulatory system as a potential requirement for typhoid toxin gene expression. This observation is intriguing as this global regulator controls the expression of numerous genes, including those involved in several aspects of Salmonella-host interactions (Dalebroux and Miller, 2014; Groisman, 2001; Kato and Groisman, 2008). To verify this observation, we determined the effects of deleting the phoPQ locus on the expression of b-galactosidase reporter fusions to pltB or cdtB (Figure 3A). Deletion of the phoPQ locus completely abolished expression of both the cdtB:lacZ and pltB:lacZ transcriptional reporters during infection of cultured epithelial cells, and expression of the reporters was restored upon introduction of a plasmid encoding phoPQ. To further explore the role of the PhoPQ system in typhoid toxin regulation, we expressed the constitutively active allele PhoQE232K (Dalebroux et al., 2014) and examined the expression of typhoid toxin following S. Typhi growth under in vitro (non-inducing) conditions (Figure 3B). We found that expression the constitutive phoQE232K allele resulted in a significant (>30-fold) increase over wild-type in the expression of the cdtB:lacZ and pltB:lacZ reporters. These results indicate that PhoPQ activation is sufficient to stimulate typhoid toxin expression under otherwise non-inducing conditions. Consistent with this observation, growth of S. Typhi under conditions that have previously been shown to stimulate PhoPQ activity, including growth in low concentrations of magnesium, acidic pH, or the presence of cationic antimicrobial peptides (Bader et al., 2005; Choi and Groisman, 2016; Garcı´a Ve´scovi et al., 1996; Prost et al., 2007), led to a significant increase in the expression of both transcriptional reporters, although acidic pH yielded more modest toxin expression (Figure 3C). This is consistent with a proteomics study that identified typhoid toxin components among S. Typhi proteins that are produced after growth under

low-magnesium conditions (Charles et al., 2009), and another study that reported elevated levels of typhoid toxin in S. Typhimurium grown under similar conditions (Guidi et al., 2013). However, the relevance of the latter study is uncertain, since utilized plasmid-encoded components in a heterologous system. The PhoPQ system controls the expression of a large number of genes, raising the possibility that its influence over typhoid toxin expression might be indirect. To explore this possibility, we first defined the locations of the promoters that control typhoid toxin expression using rapid amplification of cDNA ends. The genes encoding typhoid toxin, pltB, pltA, and cdtB, as well ttsA, a gene required for its secretion, reside on a small genomic islet where cdtB is transcribed from one strand and pltB, pltA, and ttsA are transcribed from the opposite strand (Figure S3A). We identified a single transcriptional start site for each strand that reside 122 bp and 62 bp upstream of the coding regions of cdtB and pltB, respectively (Figure S3A). Deletion of the pltB promoter region resulted in a complete loss of ttsA expression during infection (Figure S3B). These data therefore indicate that typhoid toxin transcription is controlled by two promoters: one that drives cdtB expression and one that drives the expression of a pltB-pltA-ttsA operon. We then conducted chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments to determine whether PhoP could directly bind the typhoid toxin promoters. Under low-magnesium (PhoP-activating) growth conditions, PhoP was found to bind both the pltB and cdtB promoter regions (Figure 3D). No binding was detected at either typhoid toxin promoter when S. Typhi was grown in the same medium containing a high concentration of magnesium (Figure 3D). Collectively, these data demonstrate that conditions that activate the PhoPQ system stimulate typhoid toxin expression and that PhoP is a direct activator of typhoid toxin expression. In addition to phoP and phoQ, the FAST-INSeq screen also identified slyA as significantly enriched in the pool of mutants that did not express typhoid toxin during S. Typhi infection. SlyA is a PhoP-activated transcriptional regulator that acts as a co-regulator for the expression of a subset of genes within the PhoP regulon (Navarre et al., 2005; Norte et al., 2003; Shi et al., 2004). To investigate SlyA’s role in typhoid toxin regulation, we examined the expression of pltB and cdtB in a DslyA mutant strain. In agreement with the results of the screen, we observed in infected cells significantly less pltB:lacZ expression for the DslyA mutant relative to wild-type (Figure 3E), although the reduction in expression was less pronounced than what we observed in the DphoPQ mutant (Figure 3A). In contrast, cdtB:lacZ expression during infection was not affected by the DslyA mutation, suggesting that SlyA is a co-activator of pltBpltA-ttsA expression but that it is not required for cdtB expression (Figure 3E). Similarly, the DslyA mutant exhibited decreased induction of pltB:lacZ expression compared with wild-type following in vitro growth in low-magnesium medium, but did not affect cdtB:lacZ expression under these conditions (Figure S3C). The reduced expression of pltB under inducing conditions in the DslyA mutant strain was reversed by introducing a plasmid encoding a wild-type copy of slyA (Figure S3D). Interestingly, overexpression of slyA under non-inducing growth conditions led to a substantial increase in both pltB:lacZ and cdtB:lacZ expression (Figure 4F). In the case of cdtB, this effect was not observed in a DphoPQ mutant background, suggesting that Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018 69

Figure 3. PhoPQ and SlyA Activate Typhoid Toxin Expression during Infection (A) Expression of the pltB:lacZ reporter in the indicated S. Typhi strains carrying a low-copy plasmid encoding phoPQ or the empty vector (EV). The levels of b-galactosidase activity in the inoculum and bacteria isolated from infected Henle-407 cells 20 hr post infection (hpi) were normalized by the number of CFU. (B and C) b-Galactosidase activity (Miller units) of the pltB:lacZ and cdtB:lacZ reporters in the indicated S. Typhi DphoPQ strains carrying a low-copy plasmid encoding phoPQ, phoPQE232K, or the empty vector (EV) (B) or grown in defined growth medium under conditions in which PhoPQ activity is either repressed (pH 7.2, 1 mM Mg2+) or stimulated (10 mM Mg2+, 5 mg/mL C18G, pH 4.9) (C). (D) PhoP binding to the promoter regions of the indicated genes in S. Typhi grown under conditions that stimulate (10 mM Mg2+) or repress (2 mM Mg2+) PhoPQ activity. The amount of DNA recovered for the indicated promoters was normalized to the input sample. Fold-enrichment values represent the ratio of this value to that of the rpoD control promoter. Asterisks denote promoters that were significantly enriched compared with the rpoD control under the indicated conditions. (E) Expression of the pltB:lacZ and cdtB:lacZ reporters in the indicated S. Typhi strains. The levels of b-galactosidase activity in the inoculum and bacteria isolated from infected cells were normalized by the number of CFU. (F) b-Galactosidase activity (Miller units) of the pltB:lacZ and cdtB:lacZ reporters in the indicated S. Typhi strains carrying a plasmid encoding slyA (slyA) or the empty vector (EV). Values represent the mean ± SD for three independent determinations. Statistical differences between the indicated samples are denoted as follows: ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01; n.s.s., not statistically significant. See also Figure S3.

the increased cdtB expression observed under these conditions was due to PhoPQ activation as a result of SlyA overexpression. Consistent with this hypothesis, we observed that SlyA overexpression also induced expression of other PhoP-activated genes, including those whose expression is thought to be SlyA independent (Figure S3E). In contrast to cdtB, overexpression of slyA in a DphoPQ background led to increased pltB expression (Figure 3F), indicating that SlyA can stimulate pltB expression in a PhoPQ-independent manner. Collectively, these results demonstrate that stimulation of the PhoPQ system following S. Typhi invasion of host cells directly activates typhoid toxin 70 Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018

expression and that SlyA is an important co-activator of the pltB but not of the cdtB promoter. H-NS Silences Typhoid Toxin Expression under Noninducing Conditions To gain further insight into the regulatory mechanisms that control typhoid toxin gene expression, we conducted a transposon mutagenesis screen to identify mutations that permit expression of the toxin genes under non-inducing conditions. For this screen we used the pltB:lacZ S. Typhi reporter strain in conjunction with a transposable element that carries an outward-facing, isopropyl

Figure 4. H-NS Silences Typhoid Toxin Expression under Non-inducing Conditions (A) H-NS binding to the promoter regions of the indicated S. Typhi genes after growth in a medium not permissive for typhoid toxin expression (pH 7.2, 2 mM Mg2+). Included in the analysis are the PhoP-activated genes pagC and mgtA as positive and negative controls, respectively. The amount of DNA recovered was normalized to the amount in the input sample. Fold-enrichment values represent the ratio of this value to that of the rpoD control promoter. Asterisks denote promoters that were significantly enriched compared with the rpoD control. (B and C) b-Galactosidase activity (Miller units) of the pltB:lacZ reporter in the indicated S. Typhi reporter strains grown under non-inducing conditions. Expression of the reporter in five independently generated Dhns/DphoPQ mutant strains is shown (B). Expression of the reporter in the Dhns/DphoPQ strain carrying a plasmid encoding hns or the empty vector (EV) (C). Asterisks denote statistical significance when compared with the wild-type sample. (D) Relative mRNA levels of the indicated genes in wild-type or Dhns/DphoPQ S. Typhi mutant strains grown under non-inducing conditions for toxin expression. PhoP-activated genes that are silenced by H-NS (pagC) or independent of H-NS (mgtA, slyB) were included as controls. Values shown represent the mean ± SD for three independent determinations. ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01; n.s.s., not statistically significant.

b-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible promoter that can drive the expression of downstream genes. S. Typhi mutant colonies able to express typhoid toxin were identified on LB indicator plates that contained X-Gal and IPTG. Screening more than 200,000 transposon mutants led to the identification of numerous colonies with increased pltB:lacZ expression. Mapping of the transposon insertion sites determined that in the majority of the identified mutants the transposon’s IPTG-inducible promoter inserted immediately upstream of the lacZ coding sequence, and therefore these mutants were not considered further. Several independent insertions were mapped to the region immediately upstream of slyA, placing its expression under the control of the IPTG-inducible promoter in the transposable element and indicating that, as shown above, overexpression of slyA results in increased typhoid toxin expression. Additional transposon insertions mapped to hns, which encodes a nucleoid-associated protein that modulates chromosomal structure (Fang and Rimsky, 2008; Stoebel et al., 2008) and silences the expression of horizontally acquired genes, which, like those encoding typhoid toxin, exhibit high AT content (Lucchini et al., 2006; Navarre et al., 2006). The increased pltB expression observed in these mutants did not require the addition of IPTG, indicating that stimulation of the expression of the pltB:lacZ

reporter is likely due to the loss of H-NS activity. Using ChIP, we determined that H-NS strongly binds both the pltB and the cdtB promoter regions, indicating that H-NS directly silences the typhoid toxin genes (Figure 4A). A previous screen conducted to identify mutations that allow expression of cdtB under noninducing conditions identified genes not detected in this screen (Haghjoo and Gala´n, 2007). The discrepancies between the two screens are likely due to differences in the genetic backgrounds and reporters used in the two studies. Each of the independent hns insertion mutants identified in the screen mapped to the 30 end of the hns coding region, suggesting that the mutations might result in a partial loss of H-NS function. To further investigate the role of H-NS in typhoid toxin regulation, we sought to generate an hns S. Typhi deletion mutant strain. hns has been reported to be essential for S. Typhimurium in a wild-type background but dispensable in a strain that lacks phoPQ (Navarre et al., 2006). We therefore deleted hns in a DphoPQ pltB:lacZ strain and examined the expression of the reporter in standard laboratory medium (non-inducing conditions). We found that the expression of pltB:lacZ in several independently generated Dhns/DphoPQ reporter strains was significantly (25-fold) higher than its expression in the wild-type strain grown under the same conditions (Figure 4B). The increase in pltB:lacZ expression under non-inducing conditions in the Dhns/DphoPQ strain was reversed upon hns complementation, confirming Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018 71

that the derepression of typhoid toxin expression in the hns mutant strain is due to the loss of H-NS (Figure 4C). Using qRT-PCR, we also observed that the transcript levels of the co-regulated ttsA and cdtB genes were markedly increased in the Dhns/DphoPQ strain when compared with wild-type after growth under non-inducing conditions (Figure 5D). We also compared the expression of other PhoP-regulated genes in the wild-type and Dhns/DphoPQ strains, including genes whose expression in S. Typhimurium is dependent (pagC) or independent (slyB and mgtA) of H-NS (Perez et al., 2008). We observed that expression of pagC was greatly increased in the Dhns/ DphoPQ background, while expression of slyB and mgtA was unchanged or slightly reduced (Figure 4D). These results demonstrate that PhoP-activated gene expression is not ubiquitously increased in this strain and that the observed derepression of typhoid toxin gene expression in this strain is the result of a loss of H-NS silencing. Taken together, these results indicate that in the absence of H-NS silencing the typhoid toxin genes are highly expressed, even in the absence of PhoPQ. Typhoid toxin expression is therefore controlled by a silencing and counter-silencing mechanism mediated by H-NS, PhoPQ, and the PhoPQ-regulated gene SlyA. Salmonella Typhi Localization within the SCV Is Required for Typhoid Toxin Expression As discussed above, we observed that a significant proportion of intracellular S. Typhi does not express typhoid toxin. This is in contrast to S. Typhi grown under inducing conditions in vitro, which leads to toxin expression in virtually the entire population (Figure S2D). This observation suggests that during infection a subset of intracellular S. Typhi does not receive the environmental cues required to stimulate toxin expression. To explore this premise, we examined typhoid toxin expression at the single-bacterium level during infection of Henle-407 cells using fluorescence microscopy. We found that the vast majority of infected cells contained exclusively S. Typhi that expressed high levels of the toxin reporter (Figure 5A). However, a small number of host cells contained very large numbers of bacteria (>100/cell in many cases) that did not express detectable levels of GFP (Figure 5B). The distribution and large numbers of bacteria observed in these cells suggested that the S. Typhi population that does not express the toxin genes might be localized within the host cell cytosol and not within a vacuole. Following invasion of host cells, Salmonella resides within a membrane-bound compartment. In cultured epithelial cells, however, a small proportion of the intracellular bacteria escape the phagosomal environment to reach the cellular cytosol where they replicate to high numbers (Knodler et al., 2010). To determine whether the S. Typhi population that does not express typhoid toxin is localized within the cytosol, we used fluorescence microscopy and a differential-staining protocol that distinguishes vacuolar and cytosolic Salmonella. We used pltB:gfp to identify the population of S. Typhi that expresses typhoid toxin and LPS staining after digitonin permeabilization to identify cytoplasmic bacteria (Checroun et al., 2006; Knodler et al., 2010). We observed two populations of S. Typhi: a more abundant population of vacuolar bacteria exhibiting high levels of GFP expression, and a minor population of densely clustered cytoplasmic bacteria in a small number of cells that had low or undetectable levels of GFP 72 Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018

expression (Figures 5C and S4). These data demonstrate that typhoid toxin is only expressed by S. Typhi located within the SCV and that the cues necessary to stimulate its expression are absent in the cell cytosol. During the screen for genes that control the expression of typhoid toxin, we observed that the population of S. Typhi that does not express the typhoid toxin genes was absent in biotin biosynthesis mutants, although these mutants do not appear to directly affect typhoid toxin expression. This observation, in conjunction with the observation that cytosolic bacteria are unable to express typhoid toxin, suggests that biotin biosynthesis might be required for S. Typhi to escape the SCV and/or to replicate within the cytosol. To test this hypothesis, we used fluorescence microscopy to examine typhoid toxin expression in cells infected with an S. Typhi DbioB mutant. Consistent with the observation that this mutant does not affect the expression of typhoid toxin, we found robust expression of the pltB:gfp reporter in intracellular bacteria. However, compared with cells infected with wild-type S. Typhi, we found drastically reduced numbers of bacteria that did not express typhoid toxin in the DbioB strain. The rare bacteria identified that were not expressing the toxin were filamentous (Figure S5A) and cytosolic (Figures S5B and S4C). Collectively, these data indicate that biotin biosynthesis is required for S. Typhi to grow in the host cell cytosol and further support the conclusion that S. Typhi exclusively expresses typhoid toxin within the SCV. DISCUSSION We have described here a regulatory network that effectively controls the exclusive expression of typhoid toxin within mammalian cells to ensure the coordination of typhoid toxin synthesis with its subsequent export from infected cells. We have found that S. Typhi decodes environmental cues that lead to typhoid toxin intracellular production through mechanisms involving the PhoP/PhoQ two-component transcriptional regulatory system. This system works in conjunction with an opposing silencing mechanism involving the histone-like protein H-NS that ensures the effective repression of typhoid toxin expression when S. Typhi is not in the appropriate environment for toxin production such as outside of host cells. Although we found that PhoP is able to bind the promoters that drive typhoid toxin transcription, our data indicate that in this regulatory network PhoP may be exerting its activity not as a direct transcriptional activator but rather by opposing the silencing activity of H-NS. Consistent with this notion, we found that in the absence of H-NS typhoid toxin expression is independent of PhoP/PhoQ, in agreement with recent findings indicating that a subset of S. Typhimurium’s PhoP regulon composed of horizontally acquired genes is regulated in this manner (Will et al., 2014; Zwir et al., 2012, 2014). The unique architecture of typhoid toxin suggests that this multi-subunit toxin may have emerged relatively recently (Gala´n, 2016). Consistent with this hypothesis, our results indicate that cdtB and the pltB pltA ttsA operon are regulated differently. Although transcription from both promoters is controlled by the PhoP/PhoQ system, they differ in their requirement for SlyA, thus indicating that both promoters have not yet converged into a single regulatory network. Alternatively, these differences

Figure 5. Typhoid Toxin Is Expressed by Intravacuolar but Not by Cytosolic S. Typhi (A and B) Henle-407 cells were infected with pltB:gfp S. Typhi constitutively expressing mCherry. At 18 hr post infection (hpi) the samples were fixed and S. Typhi were visualized using the mCherry (red) signal, while typhoid toxin expression was visualized using the GFP signal (green). A representative field in which all S. Typhi exhibit high levels of typhoid toxin expression is shown (A). A rare infected cell that contains large numbers of S. Typhi, distributed throughout much of the cell, which do not express the pltB:gfp typhoid toxin reporter is also shown (B). (C) HeLa cells were infected with an S. Typhi strain expressing pltB:gfp. At 12 hpi the samples were fixed and the cells were selectively permeabilized using digitonin. The nuclei of HeLa cells were visualized using DAPI staining (blue), which also faintly stained the S. Typhi chromosomal DNA. S. Typhi localized within the cell cytosol was visualized using an antibody against S. Typhi lipopolysaccharide (LPS; red) and typhoid toxin expression was visualized using the GFP signal (green). The image shown is a representative example of a rare infected cell that contains large numbers of cytoplasmic S. Typhi that exhibit little or no typhoid toxin expression. For all panels, brightness and contrast were optimized for each of the individual color channels to maximize visual clarity. Scale bars, 10 mm. See also Figures S4 and S5.

Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018 73

in the regulatory mechanisms may suggest the intriguing possibility that, in some instances, typhoid toxin may be assembled without its CdtB subunit. What might be the environmental cues that lead to typhoid toxin expression? The sensor kinase PhoQ has been shown to be able to sense several environment conditions, many of which we showed here were able to stimulate toxin expression. For example, the PhoP/PhoQ system is activated under low Mg2+ conditions, and we found that growth of S. Typhi in media containing low Mg2+ concentrations resulted in high levels of typhoid toxin expression. Interestingly, it has been previously shown that the high-affinity magnesium transporter MgtA is required by Salmonella to robustly express the PhoP regulon under lowmagnesium conditions (Park and Groisman, 2014), and our genetic screen showed that insertions within mgtA were overrepresented in the pool of mutants showing lower toxin expression. However, although a DmgtA S. Typhi mutant strains showed significantly reduced typhoid toxin expression after in vitro growth under low-magnesium growth conditions, this mutation had no effect on toxin expression after infection of cultured epithelial cells (Figure S6). However, beginning at 6 hpi, the DmgtA mutant strain was recovered at significantly reduced numbers compared with wild-type (Figure S6 and Table S4). The reduced replication of the DmgtA mutant within the SCV altered the proportion of intravacuolar versus cytoplasmic bacteria, thus altering the proportion of bacteria expressing typhoid toxin, which explains its detection in the original screen. These observations may also explain why other genes identified by our screen to affect typhoid toxin expression (Table 1) have no effect on typhoid toxin expression when individually tested (Figure 2 and Table S4). These observations also suggest that limited availability of magnesium may not be a relevant in vivo cue that leads to typhoid toxin expression and that another cue or combination of cues may be responsible for triggering toxin expression. Our data indicate that toxin expression strictly requires the environment of the SCV. We arrived at this conclusion through multiple pieces of evidence. We found that bacteria that escaped to the cell cytosol did not express typhoid toxin. This observation was further supported by the genetic screen, which identified insertions within the gene encoding the SPI-2 T3SS effector SifA as enriched in the pool of bacteria that failed to express the toxin. Previous studies have shown that mutations in this gene have a propensity to escape the SCV (Beuzon et al., 2000). Our screen also identified genes involved in biotin biosynthesis as specifically enriched in the population of bacteria that expressed typhoid toxin. We demonstrated that these mutants do not affect typhoid toxin expression, but rather affect the ability of the cytoplasmic population that fails to express typhoid toxin to grow and divide normally. Given the high degree of interconnectivity between regulatory networks and the presence of several global regulatory networks active in Salmonella during the intracellular phase of infection, it is noteworthy that each of the mutants that altered typhoid toxin expression levels identified by our two comprehensive genetic screens mapped to the PhoPQ/H-NS silencing/ counter-silencing circuit. Indeed, it is well documented that other regulatory networks co-regulate PhoP-activated genes or even regulate phoP/phoQ expression directly (Dalebroux and Miller, 74 Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018

2014; Groisman, 2001; Kato and Groisman, 2008), and yet none of those networks emerged from our screen. Our data suggest that typhoid toxin expression requires a high level of PhoQ stimulation, a feature presumably important in insulating toxin expression from crosstalk with other regulatory networks. These regulatory features provide a platform to ensure very tightly repressed toxin expression when it is not required, but very high levels of toxin expression from within SCVs. STAR+METHODS Detailed methods are provided in the online version of this paper and include the following: d d d

d

d d

KEY RESOURCES TABLE CONTACT FOR REAGENTS AND RESOURCE SHARING EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS B Bacterial Strains B Cell Lines METHOD DETAILS B Plasmids B Salmonella Typhi Infections B Transposon Mutagenesis B FAST-INSeq Screen B b-Galactosidase Assays B GFP Reporter Assays B Quantitative RT-PCR B Chromatin Immunoprecipitation B Fluorescence Microscopy B Analytical Flow Cytometry B Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS DATA AND SOFTWARE AVAILABILITY

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Supplemental Information includes six figures and six tables and can be found with this article online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.12.001. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank members of the Gala´n laboratory for careful review of the manuscript and Eduardo Groisman for useful suggestions and critical review of the manuscript. C.C.F. was supported in part by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. This work was supported by NIH grant AI079022 (to J.E.G.). AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS C.C.F. was involved in the design and interpretation of experiments and conducted all experiments shown. J.E.G. was involved in the design, interpretation, and supervision of this study. C.C.F and J.E.G. wrote the paper. Received: July 7, 2017 Revised: September 26, 2017 Accepted: November 21, 2017 Published: January 10, 2018 REFERENCES Bader, M.W., Sanowar, S., Daley, M.E., Schneider, A.R., Cho, U., Xu, W., Klevit, R.E., Le Moual, H., and Miller, S.I. (2005). Recognition of antimicrobial peptides by a bacterial sensor kinase. Cell 122, 461–472.

Beuzon, C.R., Meresse, S., Unsworth, K.E., Ruiz-Albert, J., Garvis, S., Waterman, S.R., Ryder, T.A., Boucrot, E., and Holden, D.W. (2000). Salmonella maintains the integrity of its intracellular vacuole through the action of SifA. EMBO J. 19, 3235–3249. Chang, S.J., Song, J., and Gala´n, J.E. (2016). Receptor-mediated sorting of typhoid toxin during its export from Salmonella typhi-infected cells. Cell Host Microbe 20, 682–689. Charles, R.C., Harris, J.B., Chase, M.R., Lebrun, L.M., Sheikh, A., LaRocque, R.C., Logvinenko, T., Rollins, S.M., Tarique, A., Hohmann, E.L., et al. (2009). Comparative proteomic analysis of the PhoP regulon in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi versus Typhimurium. PLoS One 4, e6994. Checroun, C., Wehrly, T.D., Fischer, E.R., Hayes, S.F., and Celli, J. (2006). Autophagy-mediated reentry of Francisella tularensis into the endocytic compartment after cytoplasmic replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 14578–14583.

Gopinath, S., Carden, S., and Monack, D. (2012). Shedding light on Salmonella carriers. Trends Microbiol. 20, 320–327. Groisman, E.A. (2001). The pleiotropic two-component regulatory system PhoP-PhoQ. J. Bacteriol. 183, 1835–1842. Guidi, R., Levi, L., Rouf, S.F., Puiac, S., Rhen, M., and Frisan, T. (2013). Salmonella enterica delivers its genotoxin through outer membrane vesicles secreted from infected cells. Cell Microbiol. 15, 2034–2050. Guzman, L.M., Belin, D., Carson, M.J., and Beckwith, J. (1995). Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J. Bacteriol. 177, 4121–4130. Haghjoo, E., and Gala´n, J.E. (2004). Salmonella typhi encodes a functional cytolethal distending toxin that is delivered into host cells by a bacterial-internalization pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4614–4619.

Choi, J., and Groisman, E.A. (2016). Acidic pH sensing in the bacterial cytoplasm is required for Salmonella virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 101, 1024–1038.

Haghjoo, E., and Gala´n, J.E. (2007). Identification of a transcriptional regulator that controls intracellular gene expression in Salmonella Typhi. Mol. Microbiol. 64, 1549–1561.

Crump, J.A., Luby, S.P., and Mintz, E.D. (2004). The global burden of typhoid fever. Bull. World Health Organ. 82, 346–353.

Hodak, H., and Gala´n, J.E. (2013). A Salmonella Typhi homologue of bacteriophage muramidases controls typhoid toxin secretion. EMBO Rep. 14, 95–102.

Dalebroux, Z.D., Matamouros, S., Whittington, D., Bishop, R.E., and Miller, S.I. (2014). PhoPQ regulates acidic glycerophospholipid content of the Salmonella Typhimurium outer membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1963–1968.

Jones, B.D., Lee, C.A., and Falkow, S. (1992). Invasion by Salmonella typhimurium is affected by the direction of flagellar rotation. Infect. Immun. 60, 2475–2480.

Dalebroux, Z.D., and Miller, S.I. (2014). Salmonellae PhoPQ regulation of the outer membrane to resist innate immunity. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 17, 106–113.

Kato, A., and Groisman, E. (2008). The PhoQ/PhoP regulatory network of Salmonella enterica. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 631, 7–21.

Demarre, G., Guerout, A.M., Matsumoto-Mashimo, C., Rowe-Magnus, D.A., Marlie`re, P., and Mazel, D. (2005). A new family of mobilizable suicide plasmids based on broad host range R388 plasmid (IncW) and RP4 plasmid (IncPalpha) conjugative machineries and their cognate Escherichia coli host strains. Res. Microbiol. 156, 245–255.

Knodler, L.A., Nair, V., and Steele-Mortimer, O. (2014). Quantitative assessment of cytosolic Salmonella in epithelial cells. PLoS One 9, e84681.

Deng, L., Song, J., Gao, X., Wang, J., Yu, H., Chen, X., Varki, N., Naito-Matsui, Y., Gala´n, J.E., and Varki, A. (2014). Host adaptation of a bacterial toxin from the human pathogen Salmonella Typhi. Cell 159, 1290–1299. Dougan, G., and Baker, S. (2014). Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and the pathogenesis of typhoid fever. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 68, 317–336. Fang, F.C., and Rimsky, S. (2008). New insights into transcriptional regulation by H-NS. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11, 113–120. Frohman, M.A., Dush, M.K., and Martin, G.R. (1988). Rapid production of fulllength cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 8998–9002. Gala´n, J.E. (2001). Salmonella interactions with host cells: type III secretion at work. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 53–86. Gala´n, J.E. (2016). Typhoid toxin provides a window into typhoid fever and the biology of Salmonella Typhi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6338–6344. Gala´n, J.E., and Curtiss, R., 3rd (1991). Distribution of the invA, -B, -C, and -D genes of Salmonella typhimurium among other Salmonella serovars: invA mutants of Salmonella typhi are deficient for entry into mammalian cells. Infect. Immun. 59, 2901–2908. Garcı´a Ve´scovi, E., Soncini, F.C., and Groisman, E.A. (1996). Mg2+ as an extracellular signal: environmental regulation of Salmonella virulence. Cell 84, 165–174.

Knodler, L.A., Vallance, B.A., Celli, J., Winfree, S., Hansen, B., Montero, M., and Steele-Mortimer, O. (2010). Dissemination of invasive Salmonella via bacterial-induced extrusion of mucosal epithelia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17733–17738. Lucchini, S., Rowley, G., Goldberg, M.D., Hurd, D., Harrison, M., and Hinton, J.C. (2006). H-NS mediates the silencing of laterally acquired genes in bacteria. PLoS Pathog. 2, e81. Maxson, M.E., and Darwin, A.J. (2004). Identification of inducers of the Yersinia enterocolitica phage shock protein system and comparison to the regulation of the RpoE and Cpx extracytoplasmic stress responses. J. Bacteriol. 186, 4199–4208. Miller, J.H. (1972). Experiments in Molecular Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press). Navarre, W.W., Halsey, T.A., Walthers, D., Frye, J., McClelland, M., Potter, J.L., Kenney, L.J., Gunn, J.S., Fang, F.C., and Libby, S.J. (2005). Co-regulation of Salmonella enterica genes required for virulence and resistance to antimicrobial peptides by SlyA and PhoP/PhoQ. Mol. Microbiol. 56, 492–508. Navarre, W.W., Porwollik, S., Wang, Y., McClelland, M., Rosen, H., Libby, S.J., and Fang, F.C. (2006). Selective silencing of foreign DNA with low GC content by the H-NS protein in Salmonella. Science 313, 236–238. Norte, V.A., Stapleton, M.R., and Green, J. (2003). PhoP-responsive expression of the Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium slyA gene. J. Bacteriol. 185, 3508–3514. Park, S.Y., and Groisman, E.A. (2014). Signal-specific temporal response by the Salmonella PhoP/PhoQ regulatory system. Mol. Microbiol. 91, 135–144.

Gawronski, J.D., Wong, S.M., Giannoukos, G., Ward, D.V., and Akerley, B.J. (2009). Tracking insertion mutants within libraries by deep sequencing and a genome-wide screen for Haemophilus genes required in the lung. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16422–16427.

Parry, C.M., Hien, T.T., Dougan, G., White, N.J., and Farrar, J.J. (2002). Typhoid fever. N. Engl. J. Med. 347, 1770–1782.

Gonzalez-Escobedo, G., Marshall, J.M., and Gunn, J.S. (2011). Chronic and acute infection of the gall bladder by Salmonella Typhi: understanding the carrier state. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 9–14.

Perez, J.C., Latifi, T., and Groisman, E.A. (2008). Overcoming H-NS-mediated transcriptional silencing of horizontally acquired genes by the PhoP and SlyA proteins in Salmonella enterica. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 10773–10783.

Goodman, A.L., McNulty, N.P., Zhao, Y., Leip, D., Mitra, R.D., Lozupone, C.A., Knight, R., and Gordon, J.I. (2009). Identifying genetic determinants needed to establish a human gut symbiont in its habitat. Cell Host Microbe 6, 279–289.

Prost, L.R., Daley, M.E., Le Sage, V., Bader, M.W., Le Moual, H., Klevit, R.E., and Miller, S.I. (2007). Activation of the bacterial sensor kinase PhoQ by acidic pH. Mol. Cell 26, 165–174.

Goodman, A.L., Wu, M., and Gordon, J.I. (2011). Identifying microbial fitness determinants by insertion sequencing using genome-wide transposon mutant libraries. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1969–1980.

Shi, Y., Latifi, T., Cromie, M.J., and Groisman, E.A. (2004). Transcriptional control of the antimicrobial peptide resistance ugtL gene by the Salmonella PhoP and SlyA regulatory proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 38618–38625.

Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018 75

Snavely, M.D., Gravina, S.A., Cheung, T.T., Miller, C.G., and Maguire, M.E. (1991). Magnesium transport in Salmonella typhimurium. Regulation of mgtA and mgtB expression. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 824–829.

Valdivia, R.H., and Falkow, S. (1996). Bacterial genetics by flow cytometry: rapid isolation of Salmonella typhimurium acid-inducible promoters by differential fluorescence induction. Mol. Microbiol. 22, 367–378.

Song, J., Gao, X., and Gala´n, J.E. (2013). Structure and function of the Salmonella Typhi chimaeric A(2)B(5) typhoid toxin. Nature 499, 350–354.

Valdivia, R.H., and Falkow, S. (1997). Fluorescence-based isolation of bacterial genes expressed within host cells. Science 277, 2007–2011.

Spano, S., Liu, X., and Gala´n, J.E. (2011). Proteolytic targeting of Rab29 by an effector protein distinguishes the intracellular compartments of humanadapted and broad-host Salmonella. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18418–18423. Spano, S., Ugalde, J.E., and Gala´n, J.E. (2008). Delivery of a Salmonella Typhi exotoxin from a host intracellular compartment. Cell Host Microbe 3, 30–38.

van Opijnen, T., Bodi, K.L., and Camilli, A. (2009). Tn-seq: high-throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nat. Methods 6, 767–772. Wang, R.F., and Kushner, S.R. (1991). Construction of versatile low-copynumber vectors for cloning, sequencing and gene expression in Escherichia coli. Gene 100, 195–199. Will, W.R., Bale, D.H., Reid, P.J., Libby, S.J., and Fang, F.C. (2014). Evolutionary expansion of a regulatory network by counter-silencing. Nat. Commun. 5, 5270–5277.

Stoebel, D.M., Free, A., and Dorman, C.J. (2008). Anti-silencing: overcoming H-NS-mediated repression of transcription in Gram-negative enteric bacteria. Microbiology 154, 2533–2545.

Zwir, I., Latifi, T., Perez, J.C., Huang, H., and Groisman, E.A. (2012). The promoter architectural landscape of the Salmonella PhoP regulon. Mol. Microbiol. 84, 463–485.

Streit, W.R., and Entcheva, P. (2003). Biotin in microbes, the genes involved in its biosynthesis, its biochemical role and perspectives for biotechnological production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 61, 21–31.

Zwir, I., Yeo, W.S., Shin, D., Latifi, T., Huang, H., and Groisman, E.A. (2014). Bacterial nucleoid-associated protein uncouples transcription levels from transcription timing. MBio 5, e01485-14.

76 Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76, January 10, 2018

STAR+METHODS KEY RESOURCES TABLE

REAGENT or RESOURCE

SOURCE

IDENTIFIER

Rabbit polyclonal anti-S. Typhi

Sifin

TS1605

Goat anti-rabbit Alexa-594

Thermo Fisher

Cat # A11012 RRID: AB_2534079

Mouse monoclonal M2 anti-FLAG

Sigma-Aldrich

Cat # F3165 RRID:AB_259529

Mouse monoclonal anti-GM130

BD Biosciences

Cat # 610823 RRID: AB_398142

Goat anti-mouse Alexa-647

Invitrogen

Cat # A-21240 RRID: AB_2535809

Antibodies

Bacterial and Virus Strains Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi ISP2825

Roy Curtis III

PMID: 1879916

SB2612 pltB:lacZ

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2625 pltB:lacZ DphoPQ

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2627 pltB:lacZ DslyA

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2890 pltB:lacZ DpurF

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2894 pltB:lacZ DyrbE

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2897 pltB:lacZ DyqcA

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2908 pltB:lacZ DsifA

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2954 pltB:lacZ DmgtA

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2884 pltB:lacZ DbioB

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2965 pltB:lacZ DphoPQ Dhns

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2718 pltB:gfp

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2900 pltB:gfp DphoPQ

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2886 pltB:gfp DslyA

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2895 pltB:gfp DyrbE

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2885 pltB:gfp DbioB

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2613 cdtB:lacZ

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2626 cdtB:lacZ DphoPQ

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2628 cdtB:lacZ DslyA

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2720 phoP-3xFLAG

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB2993 hns-3XFLAG

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB3235 cdtB-3xFLAG ttsA-3xFLAG

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

SB3206 cdtB-3xFLAG ttsA-3xFLAG DPpltB

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

E. coli b-2163 Dnic 35

Didier Mazel

PMID: 15748991

Chemicals, Peptides, and Recombinant Proteins Digitonin

Sigma-Aldrich

Cat # D141

DAPI

Sigma-Aldrich

Cat # 10236276001

Terminal Transferase

New England BioLabs

Cat # M0315S

MmeI

New England BioLabs

Cat # R0637S

Sau3AI

New England BioLabs

Cat # R0169S

BamHI

New England BioLabs

Cat # R3136S

ONPG

Sigma-Aldrich

Cat # N1127

X-gal

American BIO

Cat # AB02400

IPTG

Sigma-Aldrich

Cat # I6758

TRIzol

Thermo Fisher

Cat # 15596026 (Continued on next page)

Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76.e1–e5, January 10, 2018 e1

Continued REAGENT or RESOURCE

SOURCE

IDENTIFIER

iScript cDNA synthesis kits

BIO-RAD

Cat # 1708891

iTaq Universal SYRB Green Supermix

BIO-RAD

Cat # 1725121

Critical Commercial Assays

Experimental Models: Cell Lines Henle-407 (Human epithelial cells)

Roy Curtiss III

N/A

HeLa (human epithelial cells)

ATCC

CCL-2 RRID:CVCL_0030

pSB4004 pWSK-PrpsM-mCherry

Gala´n Laboratory

PMID: 22042847 (Spano et al., 2011)

pSB3784 pBAD-tetR-empty vector

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

pSB4785 pBAD-slyA

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

pWSK129 pWSK-empty vector

Sidney Kushner

PMID: 2055470

pSB5091 pWSK-phoPQ

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

Oligonucleotides See Table S6. Recombinant DNA

pSB5093 pWSK-phoPQE232K

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

pSB4702 pWSK-slyA

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

pSB5090 pWSK-hns

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

pSB4807 pSAM-cmR

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

pSB4700 pAJD428-ampR-kanR

Gala´n Laboratory

This study

GraphPad Prism

GraphPad Software

https://www.graphpad.com/ scientific-software/prism/

MicroManager

Ronald Vale lab, UCSF

https://micro-manager.org

Adobe Photoshop

Adobe

www.adobe.com

Adobe Illustrator

Adobe

www.adobe.com

INSeq_pipeline_v2 package

Andrew Goodman lab, Yale University

N/A

FlowJo

FlowJo, LLC

https://www.flowjo.com

Software and Algorithms

CONTACT FOR REAGENTS AND RESOURCE SHARING Requests and inquiries for reagents and resource sharing should be directed to the Lead Contact, Dr. Jorge Gala´n (jorge.galan@ yale.edu). EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS Bacterial Strains All S. Typhi strains described (listed in the Key Resources Table) were derived from the wild-type isolate ISP2825 (Gala´n and Curtiss, 1991) and were constructed using standard recombinant DNA and allelic exchange procedures using the E. coli b-2163 Dnic35 as the conjugative donor strain (Demarre et al., 2005). Strains were routinely cultured in LB broth at 37 C. Where indicated, a chemically defined growth medium was used that is based on N minimal medium (Snavely et al., 1991), containing 0.2% glucose as a carbon source, supplemented with the indicated concentrations of MgCl2 and adjusted to pH 7.2 unless otherwise stated. Cell Lines The Henle-407 and HeLa cell lines employed in this study were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, GIBCO) supplemented with 10% bovine calf serum (BCS, Gemini Bioproducts) at 37 C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. Both cell lines were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination. HeLa cells were obtained from the ATCC and Henle-407 cells were obtained from the Roy Curtiss library collection. See the Key Resources Table.

e2 Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76.e1–e5, January 10, 2018

METHOD DETAILS Plasmids All plasmids (listed in Key Resources Table) were constructed using standard recombinant DNA techniques. The plasmid used to over-express slyA was constructed by inserting the slyA coding sequence downstream of the PBAD promoter in a tetracycline-resistant derivative of the pBAD30 plasmid (Guzman et al., 1995). All plasmids used for complementation experiments were derived from the low copy plasmid pWSK129 (Wang and Kushner, 1991), into which the indicated genes and their native promoters were cloned. Salmonella Typhi Infections To infect Henle-407 and HeLa cells, overnight cultures of S. Typhi were diluted 1/20 into fresh LB containing 0.3 M NaCl and grown to an OD600 of 0.9. Cells were infected for 1 hour in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 50 (FASTINSeq screen and western blot analysis) or 20 (all other experiments). Cells were then washed three times with HBSS and incubated in culture medium containing 100 mg/ml gentamycin to kill extracellular bacteria. After 1 hour, cells were washed and fresh medium was added containing 5 mg/ml gentamycin to avoid repeated cycles of reinfection. Transposon Mutagenesis Transposon mutagenesis for the FAST-INSeq screen was conducted using a mariner transposon delivered by pSB4807, a modified version of the pSAM_Bt plasmid (Goodman et al., 2009) in which the ermR cassette was replaced by a cmR cassette. This suicide vector was mobilized into the pltB:gfp S. Typhi strain by conjugation using E. coli b-2163 Dnic35 as the donor strain. Mutants were selected by plating on LB agar plates containing 30 mg/ml chloramphenicol. A total of 200,000 mutants were collected and multiple aliquots of this library were stocked for subsequent use in the screen (described below). Transposon mutagenesis for the in vitro screen seeking mutants that activate typhoid toxin expression under non-inducing conditions was conducted in a similar manner but using a mini Tn5 transposon from pSB4700, a modified version of the pAJD428 plasmid (Maxson and Darwin, 2004), and pltB:lacZ S. Typhi as the host strain. In this screen, mutants were selected on LB plates containing 40 mg/ml kanamycin, which also contained 1 mM IPTG (to induce expression from the transposable element’s outward-facing Ptac promoter) and 40 mg/ml X-gal (to identify mutants exhibiting pltB:lacZ expression under these non-inducing conditions). Individual blue colonies were picked, colony purified two times, and assayed using quantitative b-galactosidase assays to identify active mutants. The transposon insertion sites of selected mutants were identified by isolating their genomic DNA, which was partially digested with the restriction enzyme Sau3AI (New England Biolabs). Digested genomic DNA was ligated to DNA adaptors that had been digested with BamHI (New England Biolabs) and ligation products were PCR-amplified using primers that anneal to the adaptor sequences. PCR products were then sequenced using an outward-facing primer within the transposable element. A total of >200,000 mutant colonies were screened in this manner. FAST-INSeq Screen Five 15 cm dishes were seeded with 1x107 Henle-407 cells each and grown for 24 hours prior to infection using the transposon mutant library described above. Aliquots of the inoculum used for infection were collected for subsequent INSeq preparation (inoculum pool). 18 hours post infection, the cells were washed three times with PBS, detached from plates using dilute trypsin and pelleted by centrifugation at 150 x g for 5 minutes. Cells were lysed using a 5 min incubation in 0.1% sodium deoxycholate (in PBS) supplemented with 100 mg/ml DNase I to degrade and solubilize the genomic DNA released from lysed host cells. The lysate was centrifuged at 5,000 x g for 5 minutes to isolate S. Typhi from the soluble cellular debris. The S. Typhi-containing pellet was re-suspended in PBS and further purified from cellular debris using two spins at 150 x g for 5 minutes (discarding the pellet fraction) and one spin at 3,200 x g for 20 minutes (discarding the supernatant). An aliquot of the recovered S. Typhi was amplified by growth in LB at 37 C and subsequently prepared for INSeq sequencing (post-infection pool) and the remainder was washed and diluted in PBS to a concentration of 2x106 bacteria/ml for FACS. A total of 6x106 S. Typhi mutants were sorted according to their fluorescence intensity in the GFP channel (488 nm excitation, 515/20 with 505LP emission) using a BD FACS Aria II flow cytometer. The isolated low fluorescence and high fluorescence pools were amplified by growth in LB at 37 C and subsequently prepared for INSeq sequencing. The screen was conducted using the same mutant library on three independent occasions. For INSeq sequencing, genomic DNA was extracted from each of the mutant pools, digested with MmeI (New England Biolabs) and barcoded samples were prepared for sequencing as described previously (van Opijnen et al., 2009). The purified 121 bp DNA products containing barcodes to identify the individual mutant pools were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 system at the Yale Center for Genomic Analysis. The sequencing data were analyzed using the INSeq_pipeline_v2 package (Goodman et al., 2011) which separated sequencing reads by pool, mapped/quantified insertions and grouped insertions by gene. For each pool, the total number of sequencing reads was normalized to be 2,176,000 (an average of 500/gene). To identify genes in which insertions were enriched in a statistically significant manner in one pool compared to another, a value of 50 (10% of the average number of reads per gene) was added to the normalized number of reads in both pools. Ratios of the log-transformed read numbers for the two pools were then calculated and genes with values that were an average of more than two standard deviations from the mean over the three replicates of the screen were considered to be significantly enriched.

Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76.e1–e5, January 10, 2018 e3

b-Galactosidase Assays For in vitro grown samples, unless otherwise stated, overnight cultures were washed two times, diluted 1/20 into fresh medium and grown for 8 hours at 37 C at which point 10 or 20 ml of the culture was added to 90 ml of permeabilization buffer (100 mM Na2HPO4, 20 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.8 mg/ml hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide [CTAB], 0.4 mg/ml sodium deoxycholate, 5.4 mL/ml b-mercaptoethanol) and assayed as described below. For samples collected from infected cells, 3x105 Henle-407 cells were plated in 6-well plates and grown for 24 hours prior to infection with the indicated strains. Following infections, cells were washed two times with PBS, released from the plates using dilute trypsin and pelleted by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 150 x g. Cells were then lysed in 0.1% sodium deoxycholate (in PBS) supplemented with 100 mg/ml DNase I and the lysate was centrifuged at 5,000 x g for 5 minutes to pellet the bacteria. The bacteria were re-suspended in PBS, a small aliquot of which was diluted to calculate the total number CFU recovered. The remainder of the bacteria were re-suspended in 100 ml of permeabilization buffer and assayed as described below. Assays were conducted at 20 hpi other than the experiment depicted in Figure 2B, which was conducted at 8 hpi to avoid biases introduced by the low rates of survival of some of the mutant strains assessed in this experiment at later time points. b-galactosidase assays were conducted using a modified version of the protocol developed by Miller (Miller, 1972). Briefly, samples were permeabilized for 20 minutes at room temperature in the buffer described above. 600 ml of substrate buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 2.7 mL/mL b-mercaptoethanol, 1 mg/ml ONPG [o-nitrophenyl-b-D-galactopyranoside, Sigma]) was then added to initiate the reactions. Once the samples developed an obvious yellow colour, the reactions were quenched using 700 ml of 1M Na2CO3 and the reaction time was noted. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 5 minutes and the OD420 of the samples was measured. Miller units were calculated as: (1000 * OD420) / (reaction time [minutes] * culture volume assayed [ml] * OD600 [culture]). Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to determine the statistical significance of the indicated pairwise comparisons. GFP Reporter Assays 4x106 Henle-407 cells were plated in 10 cm dishes and grown for 24 hours prior to infection with the pltB:gfp S. Typhi strain. At the indicated time points post infection, the intracellular bacteria were recovered and the total number of CFU was determined as described above for b-galactosidase assays. The bacteria were suspended in 200 mL PBS and added to 96-well black clear bottom plates (Corning) and the fluorescence intensity of GFP was determined using a Tecan Infinite m1000 plate reader (488/5 excitation, 510/5 emission). Quantitative RT-PCR Samples were grown as described and total RNA was isolated using RNAprotect Bacteria Reagent and RNeasy purification kits (QIAGEN) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Because the RNAprotect reagent caused lysis of the Dhns/DphoPQ strain, RNA was instead isolated from all strains using TRIzol (Thermo Fisher) according to manufacturer’s instructions for the experiments employing this mutant. Following DNase I treatment, cDNA was synthesized using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (BIO-RAD) and qPCR was conducted using iTaq Universal SYRB Green Supermix (BIO-RAD) and the iCycler IQ system (BIO-RAD). Transcript levels were normalized using the levels of 16S RNA and two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to determine the statistical significance of the indicated pairwise comparisons between samples. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments were performed using strains that featured C-terminal 3xFLAG epitope-tagged versions of phoP or hns integrated at the native genomic locus. Overnight cultures were washed, diluted 1/20 in 6 mL of defined growth medium containing the indicated concentration of MgCl2 and grown for 4.5 hours at 37 C. Samples were fixed by adding formaldehyde to a final concentration of 1% for 15 minutes, at which time fixation was quenched by adding 125 mM glycine and samples were washed three times with PBS. Bacterial pellets were re-suspended in 1.8 mL of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, complete protease inhibitor cocktail [Sigma]), lysed using a One Shot Cell Disruptor (Constant Systems Ltd) and sonicated (15% amplitude, 3 minutes, 15 second pulses) using a Branson Digital Sonifier to fragment genomic DNA to an average size of 500 bp. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 15 minutes and a 50 mL aliquot was taken (input DNA). 10 mL of anti-FLAG M2 Affinity Gel (Sigma) was added to the remaining sample, which was incubated for 2 hours at 4 C with agitation. Samples were then washed twice in lysis buffer, twice in LiCl/detergent buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 250 mM LiCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1% Triton X-100), once in TE (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA), and eluted in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 1% SDS (65 C for 15 minutes with agitation). Eluted immunoprecipitates were incubated at 65 C for 9 hours to reverse crosslinks and DNA was purified using silica spin columns. qPCR using iTaq Universal SYRB Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) and the CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) was then used to quantify the promoter regions corresponding to the indicated genes. Fold enrichment values were calculated as: (IPgene / IPrpoD ) / (Inputgene / InputrpoD). One-way t tests were used to determine the statistical significance of the enrichment of the tested promoter regions. Fluorescence Microscopy To image fluorescent bacteria, Henle-407 cells plated on glass coverslips were infected with the indicated S. Typhi pltB:gfp strains carrying a plasmid that drives constitutive mCherry expression. At the indicated time point post-infection, the samples were washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, washed thoroughly with PBS and mounted on slides. Slides were imaged using an Eclipse TE2000 inverted microscope (Nikon) with an Andor Zyla 5.5 sCMOS camera driven by Micromanager software (https://www. e4 Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76.e1–e5, January 10, 2018

micro-manager.org). Selective digitonin permeabilization experiments to visualize cytoplasmic S. Typhi were conducted similarly to previously described methods (Checroun et al., 2006; Knodler et al., 2010). Briefly, cells were plated on coverslips and infected with the indicated pltB:gfp S. Typhi strains as described above. At 12 hours post infection, an optimal time point to capture both high levels of typhoid toxin expression and relatively frequent instances of S. Typhi in the host cell cytosol, cells were washed twice with HBSS, permeabilized using 20 mg/ml digitonin (Sigma) in HBSS for 1 minute, and washed twice with HBSS. Cells were then incubated in a 1:10,000 dilution of rabbit polyclonal anti-S. Typhi LPS antibody (Sifin) and a 1/200 dilution of a mouse anti-GM130 antibody (BD Biosciences) in HBSS for 15 minutes at 37 C (5% CO2 incubator). Coverslips were then washed thoroughly using PBS and fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde. Samples were then stained using Alexa-594 conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (1:2,000 dilution, Thermo Fisher), an Alexa-647 conjugated anti-mouse antibody (1:2,000 dilution, invitrogen) and DAPI (Sigma) to stain DNA for 2 hours at room temperature, washed extensively using PBS, mounted on coverslips, and imaged as described above. The fraction of infected cells containing cytoplasmic bacteria was quantified using this approach, using the GM130 signal to identify permeabilized cells, the DAPI signal to identify infected cells and LPS staining to identify infected cells containing cytoplasmic bacteria. Data shown for each strain represent the average +/- the standard error of the mean for four independent experiments wherein the total number of cells containing cytoplasmic bacteria was determined for at least 100 infected and permeabilized cells. Digitonin concentrations that were sufficient to permeabilize Henle-407 cells displaced the cells from the coverslips; this phenomenon has been described previously for other epithelial cell lines (Knodler et al., 2014). HeLa cells, which are commonly used for experiments to visualize cytoplasmic Salmonellae, were therefore used for these experiments. For all images, brightness and contrast were optimized for each of the individual color channels to maximize visual clarity. Analytical Flow Cytometry For in vitro grown samples, overnight cultures of pltB:gfp were washed twice and re-suspended in the defined medium described above containing the indicated concentrations of MgCl2. Bacteria were then washed twice and re-suspended in PBS to a final concentration of 106 bacteria/ml for flow cytometry analysis. For samples isolated from infected cells, the indicated pltB:gfp strains carrying a plasmid driving constitutive mCherry expression were used to infect Henle-407 cells as described above. At 18 hours post infection, bacteria were isolated and prepared for flow cytometry as described for the FAST-INSeq screen. For each sample the fluorescence intensity in the GFP channel (488 nm excitation, 515/20 with 505LP emission) was analyzed for 10,000 bacteria using a BD FACS Aria II flow cytometer. For samples isolated from infected cells, only particles with mCherry levels (532 nm excitation, 610/20 with 600LP emission) above the background levels observed for mCherry-negative control samples were analyzed. Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends An overnight culture of wild-type S. Typhi (ISP2825) was washed twice and diluted 1/20 into fresh defined medium containing 10 mM MgCl2. Following 5 hours of growth at 37 C, total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Thermo Fisher) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The transcriptional start sites at the typhoid toxin locus were then mapped using previously described methods (Frohman et al., 1988). Briefly, gene-specific cDNA was synthesized using primers that anneal to the coding sequences of pltB, cdtB and ttsA respectively. Homopolymeric tails were added to the 30 ends of the cDNA using terminal transferase (New England Biolabs), which permitted subsequent PCR amplification of the cDNAs, the products of which were sequenced to identify the transcriptional start sites. QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Details of the statistical tests used to evaluate the significance of all observations (including the statistical test, precision and dispersion metrics, the n values used as well as how significance is defined), is provided in the corresponding figure legends. The methods of statistical analysis are also described for individual experimental approaches in the Method Details section above. DATA AND SOFTWARE AVAILABILITY The following software was used in this study: Graphpad Prism (plotting data), Micro-Manager (image acquisition), Adobe Illustrator and Adobe Photoshop (image preparation), FlowJo (analysis of flow cytometry data) and the INSeq_pipeline_v2 package provided by the Andrew Goodman laboratory (analysis of INseq data). See Key Resources Table.

Cell Host & Microbe 23, 65–76.e1–e5, January 10, 2018 e5