Decreased Paradoxic Pulse from Increased Venous Return in Severe Asthma

Decreased Paradoxic Pulse from Increased Venous Return in Severe Asthma

Decreased Paradoxic Pulse from Increased Venous Return in Severe Asthma Pierre Squara, M.D.;* ]ean-Fra~ois Dhainaut, M.D.;t Bruno Schremmer, M.D.;t Je...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 8 Views

Decreased Paradoxic Pulse from Increased Venous Return in Severe Asthma Pierre Squara, M.D.;* ]ean-Fra~ois Dhainaut, M.D.;t Bruno Schremmer, M.D.;t Jean-Pierre Sollet, M.D.;* and Gerard Bleichner, M.D.*

During severe asthma, paradoxic pulse may result from increased impedance to left ventricular ejection, mechanical impairment of left ventricular 6lling by ventricular interdependence or decreased pulmonary venous return augmented by hypovolemia. We studied the effect of reversible blood volume expansion by MAST in8ation during severe attacks of asthma. Ten patients with clinically detectable paradoxic pulse of more than 20 mm Hg were studied. All had a history of reversible bronchial asthma with evidence of respiratory and circulatory failure. Standard therapy for asthma was started. We observed no difference in respiratory and heart rates during MAST

pulse is frequently associated with acute P aradoxic asthma and is considered an index of the severity 1-s

of both airway obstruction and its cardiovascular consequences. IHl Paradoxic pulse reflects a decreased arterial systolic pressure in inspiration and an increase during expiration and is defined as the maximum difference of systolic arteriai pressure within a respiratory cycle. Prior studiess-21 implied that the inspiratory fall is the major factor, and that it is caused by inspiratory decrease in LVSV due to three main mechanisms: (1) decreased pulmonary venous return, (2) enhanced ventricular interdependence and (3) increased left ventricle afterload. Rapid volume expansion has never been evaluated as a treatment of circulatory failure in severe asthma. If the above mechanisms are correct, rapid filling therapy may result in the following hypotheses: (a) increased mean systemic venous pressure could possibly reduce respiratory variations of systemic venous return, (b) increased venous return and presumably increased RV volume could accentuate ventricular interdependence and tend to increase paradoxic pulse, (c) increased RV preload could partially compensate for the increased RV afterload and, increased mean pulmonary vascular bed volume and pressure could maintain a better LV preload throughout the respiratory cycle and reduce paradoxic pulse. *MedicaiiCU, Victor Dupouy Hospital, Argenteuil, France. tMedical ICU, Cochin Port-Royal University Hospital, Paris, France. Manuscript received February 16; revision accepted July 5.

ioDation. Paradoxic pulse was consistently decreased during MAST ioDation; paradoxic pulse returned to baseline values after MAST deRation. The decrease in paradoxic pulse was produced by an increased inspiratory systolic arterial pressure. We conclude that a reduction in pulmonary venous return is more important than ventricular interdependence in producing paradoxic pulse during severe asthma. (Chest 1990; 97:377-83) MAST= military antishock trouser; AN OVA= analysis of variance; LVSV =left ventricular stroke volume; PVR =pulmonary venous return; IVC =inferior vena cava

Since rapid fluid infusion in acute asthma could lead to possible beneficial or deleterious effects on hemodynamics, we have utilized the progressive inflation of MAST which provides a rapidly reversible filling. 22 During MAST inflation, if paradoxic pulse were to decrease, hypotheses a and c would each or both be true and therefore rapid filling therapy could be of importance in acute asthma. PATIENTS AND METHODS

lbtients We prospectively studied all patients admitted to the hospital for asthma between August 1986 and January 1988. The following protocol was accepted by the ethical committee of our institution. To be included in the study, patients met the fi,Jiowing criteria: (I) age between 15 and 65 years old; (2) no evidence of previous t:ardiac or renal disease; (3) a clear past history of reversible airway obstruction of allergic or idiopathic etiology; (4) evidence for actual episode of asthma; (5) no chest x-ray evidence of emphysema, chronic bronchopathy, interstitial or other restrictive pathology; (6) paradoxic pulse greater than 20 mm Hg using sphygmomanometry; (7) informed consent from patient or family for children. All patients were examined by a senior intensivist before entry in the protocol and admitted immediately to the intensive care unit. Standard therapy for asthma was initiated: nasal administration of humidified oxygen; intravenous hydrocortisone, 600 mw'24 h; and continuous salbutamol intravenous infusion at an initial dose of 0.25 mg/h and increased if no clinical improvement occurred. The pmtocol was started without delay. The total time for completing the pmhx:ol was less than 10 min. In all patients the standard therapy was effective and all recovered. One patient with a previous history of epilepsy needed transient mechanical ventilation because of an episode of grand mal seizure, 15 min after the MAST procedure.

Methods Arterial pressure was monitored by radial cannulation and a CHEST I 97 I 2 I FEBRUARV.1990

377

oflbtimla

Table 1-Main C~ Patient No.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean ±SD

Table 2-Effecta of MAST on Rapiratory and Heart .Rate

Age (yr)

Lactate

Pa01

Pco1

HCO;

pH

Hemoglob

Respiratory Rate:/mn

25 30 25 15 15 23 50 19 43 27 27.2 11.4

2.8 2.8 3 6.1 5.2 7 3 3.7 2.3 4.4 4.03 1.59

66 60 64 66 55 43 57 64 61 33 56.9 10.85

45 40 44 66 40 78 42 48 47 52 50.2 13.12

23 24 19 19 21 18 22 21 23 25 21.5 2.32

7.31 7.36 7.32 7.17 7.25 7.05 7.33 7.29 7.29 7.3 7.267 0.092

15 14.3 14.7 14.2 13.8 13.6 11.6 15.8 15.5 15.4 14.39 1.23

Hewlett- Packard transducer positioned at the radial artery level with atmospheric pressure as a zero reference level. Electrocardiogram and radial arterial pressure were recorded on a Siemens Mingograph multichannel recorder. An arterial sample was obtained for analysis of blood gas and lactate. The patient wore a MAST (Gladiator shoclc suit~ Ten stable respiratory cycles were examined at three different periods: (1) baseline, (2) after MAST inftation and (3) after MAST deRation. ~ first inftated the bladders of the inftater fur the legs to 40 mm Hg pressure and then inftated the bladder of the inftater fur the abdomen to 30 mm Hg. The inftation procedure took less than 1 min. Stable respiratory cycles were selected and recorded. The bladders of the inftaters fur the abdomen and the legs were then simultaneously deflated. We measured for each of the ten respiratory cycles maximum (expiratory) and minimum (inspiratory) systolic and diastolic pressures. Pulse pressure at both expiration and inspiration was calculated: expiratory pulse pressure= maximum systolic minus maximum diastolic pres-

Heart Rate:/mn

Patient No.

Before During MAST MAST

After MAST

Before MAST

During MAST

10 17 20 10 25 26 26 25 23 19 23 11 11 11 18.3 6.05

10

7 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Mean ±SD

130 132 100 160 145 115 110 145 120 140 136 132.7 18.28

125 130 100 155 144 144 110 130 115

10 15 18 20 9

20 9

26 22 17 26

26 22 18 24

18.2 6.79

18.4 6.47

After MAST

130 132 100 157 145 145 112 140 120 142 128.9 132.3 16.97 17.31

sure; inspiratory pulse pressure= minimum systolic minus minimum diastolic pressure. Pressure variation between expiration and inspiration (delta pressure) was then calculated for each systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure using expiratory value minus inspiratory value of each pressure. ~ finally calculated means of each pressure for the ten respiratory cycles. StatistiCal Analysis

Results are presented as mean± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was .made by noilparametric AN OVA fur repeated measures. Where ANOVA revealed significant effects, Wilcoxon test was used to malce appropriate comparisons. The p<0.05 was considered as significant to reject the null hypothesis. Bonferroni correction was used to compensate multiple comparisons.

INSPIRATORY RADIAL PRESSURES 160

systolic pressure

100

diastolic pressure

60

140

90

50

120

80

40

100

80

pulse pressure

I

30

60

20

FIGURE 1. Effect of MAST ioDation on radial artery expiratory pressure. There was no significant difference during MAST inftation fur systolic, diastolic or pulse radial artery pressure before, during and after MAST. Mean systolic pressure: 150.1±23.4 mm Hg, 148.1±23.2 mm Hg, NS, 149.1±22.9 mm Hg. Mean diastolic pressure: 98.8±13.3 mm Hg, 97.7±14.6 mm Hg, NS, 97.8±12.4. Mean pulse pressure: 51.2± 12.8 mm Hg, 50.0± 11.8 mm Hg, NS, 51.32± 12.3 mm Hg.

378

Decreased Paradoxic Pulse in Sewn! Aslhma (Squara et al)

EXPIRATORY RADIAL PRESSURES 200 180

systolic pressure

-------------•

...

120

110

100

160 140

120

-----------~ ~

90 80

diastolic pressure

pulse pressure

80

~

70

!~f

60

~

50

~

40

I

.~•

I •

FIGURE 2. Effect of MAST inflation on radial artery inspiratory pressure. There was a significant increase (p<0.01) in systolic, diastolic and pulse pressure during MAST inflation. Before during and after MAST. Mean systolic pressure: 105±21.4 mm Hg, 122.5±22.7 mm Hg, p<0.01, 103.2±21.1 mm Hg. Mean diastolic pressure: 72.5± 12.2 mm Hg, 78.8± 14.1 mm Hg, p<0.01, 71.3± 12.0 mm Hg. Mean pulse pressure: 33± 12.9 mm Hg, 41.9± 11.1 mm Hg, p<0.01, 32± 12.4 mm Hg.

RESULTS

We included ten procedures for nine patients. A single patient was admitted twice in the same week for two distinct severe bronchial asthma episodes. All

{expiratory-inspiratory) delta systolic pressure

patients had evidence of respiratory and circulatory failure with alveolar hypoventilation, hypoxia, tachycardia and metabolic acidosis with hyperlactacidemia (Tables 1 and 2). No patient had hypotension (Fig 1) but during the inspiratory phase, five had systolic

RADIAL PRESSURE

delta diastolic pressure

delta pulse pressure 40 30

20

10

!

.··~ FIGURE 3. Effect of MAST inflation on radial artery difference pressure between inspiration and expiration {delta pressure). The lef\ side of the figure shows very significant (p
CHEST I 97 I 2 I FEBRUARY, 1990

379

pressure below 100 mm Hg and diastolic pressure less than 70 mm Hg. For these five patients the pulse pressure was below 30 mm Hg (Fig 2). We observed no difference in respiratory and heart rates during MAST inflation (Thble 2). Radial systolic, diastolic and pulse pressures were not significantly changed by MAST inflation during the expiratory phase (Fig 1 and 2) but all three parameters significantly increased during the inspiratory phase (Fig 1 and 2) for each individual patient. Pressure variations between inspiration and expiration (delta pressures) were markedly decreased by MAST inflation (Fig 3); delta systolic (ie, paradoxic pulse): 44.3±20.3 vs 27.5± 13.0 mm Hg; delta diastolic: 26.2±9.4 vs 19.5±7.4 mm Hg. Delta pulse pressure was also significantly decreased by MAST inflation (18.5± 11.8 vs 8.0±6.5 mm Hg). After MAST deflation, all patients returned to baseline values. The decrease in paradoxic pulse became significant after inflation of only the bladders of the inflaters for the legs (Fig 4). In three patients who were excluded from the protocol because of their refusal to wear the MAST, one liter of colloid fluid was infused rapidly for hypovolemia and it caused the same effect upon paradoxic pulse as wearing the MAST (Fig 5). DISCUSSION

We demonstrated a constant and significant increase in inspiratory systolic, diastolic and pulse arterial pressures during MAST inflation while expiratory pressures remained unchanged. In consequence, delta systolic (paradoxic pulse), delta diastolic and delta pulse pressures all decreased. All pressures returned to baseline values in inspiration after MAST deflation.

PP during MAST inflation

4. Decreased paradoxic pulse during MAST ioDation: leg ioDation= after only the bladders for the legs have been inflated. Total ioDation= after the bladders of the legs of the abdomen have been ioDated. *p<0.05, ••p
380

Respiratory and heart rates were unchanged during the whole MAST procedure, suggesting that there had been no change in airway obstruction during the limited duration of the protocol. Criticsm of Methodology

The choice of MAST inflation for realizing a rapid filling test seems most appropriate in such patients. Indeed, this method has two advantages: (1) reversibility of volume loading in a situation in which vigorous fluid therapy may promote pulmonary edema, 9 and (2) the possibility for a patient to be his own control: the short duration of the protocol and the reversibility allowed us to check for the absence of other causes (such as airway obstruction improvement) to explain the variations of arterial pressures. The increased circulatory volume after MAST inflation is of debated importance. 23 If we consider the mean of reported values, the translocated fluid volume from lower extremities and abdomen to the central circulation is about 10 mllkg. However, there are considerable variations depending on circulating blood volume, baroreceptor activity and the protocol of MAST inflation, including the order of sequential inflation (first of the bladders of the inflaters for the legs and then of the bladder of the inflater for the abdomen) and pressure levels. 23 Reported physiologic adaptation following MAST inflation includes progressive increase in atrial natriuretic factor, 24 •215 decrease in vasopressin96 and decrease in renin activityZI which may all alter the hemodynamic status of the patient. However, limited duration of the protocol and return of hemodynamic values to baseline after MAST deflation led us to consider these responses as negligible.

Fluid therapy in 3 excluded

TO

250 cc

500 cc

750cc

patients

1000cc

5. Decreased paradoxic pulse after rapid fluid infusion in three patients excluded from the study because they refused wearing MAST.

FIGURE

Decr8ased Paradoxic Pulse In Sewll1l Asthma (Square et 81)

Decrease in Paradoxic Pulse due to an Inspiratory Increase in LVSV: The observed reduction in paradoxic pulse during MAST inflation paralleled the increase of inspiratory arterial pulse pressure. Theoretically, this may be due to either an increased inspiratory left ventricular stroke output or a decreased inspiratory systemic vascular distensibility. Our findings suggest a mechanism taking place only during inspiration and not during expiration. It is likely that MAST inflation would have acted on systemic arterial distensibility throughout the entire respiratory cycle. In addition, most of the clinical reports on hemodynamic consequences of MAST inflation at moderate pressure inflation, as used in our study, concluded that such external pressures only affect low pressure veins and not the high pressure arteries. 22 •23 This allows us to conclude that MAST inflation increases inspiratory left ventricular stroke output. Inspiratory Increase in LVSV Secondary to Increase in PVR: Because left ventricular afterload and contractility are unchanged during MAST inflation, it is therefore likely that MAST inflation increases inspiratory left ventricular preload. An inspiratory increased left ventricular preload may be due to a decreased ventricular interdependence or an increased PVR. Ventricular interdependence tends to increase during MAST inflation. All investigators observed an increase in venous return22 •23 and hence right ventricular volumes. 27 This strongly argues against ventricular interdependence as the dominant mechanism for paradoxic pulse in asthma and allows to consider an inspiratory increase in PVR as the main effect of MAST inflation. Inspiratory Increase in PVR as an Increase in RV Performance: An inspiratory increase in pulmonary venous return may result from one of the following: enhanced inspiratory RV performance or reduced inspiratory pulmonary venous pooling. The MAST inflation might increase the fraction of the lung in zone 3 and hence participate to increase the pulmonary venous flow for the same lung inflation. 28 •29 During our procedure there was no variation of the degree of airway obstruction, and possible modification of the lung zone characteristics may only be due to an increase in inspiratory RV output. Thus, even if an increased zone 3 may act as an amplifier, our findings are consistent with an inspiratory improvement of the RV performance. Increased RV Perfornumce as an Increase Preload: Theoretically, an increase in RV performance may be due to an increase in preload or a decrease in afterload, but during the study period there was no variation of the various factors known to overload the right ventricle during asthma: increased pulmonary resistance by pulmonary hyperinflation, hypoxia, hypercapnia and acidosis. 11•15•20 Recently, Jardin et al21 highlighted the

influence of the decreased extramural pressure in afterloading the RV, assuming that the pressure surrounding free wall of the RV (pleural pressure) was lower than the mean alveolar pressure surrounding intrapulmonary vessels. Regarding this mechanism, the abdominal compartment inflation of the MAST may increase intraabdominal pressure and consequently increase the pleural pressure by passive elevation of the diaphragm. We do not believe this phenomenon to be important because the inspiratory transdiaphragmatic pressure is very high during an asthmatic attack and would not be significantly affected by low pressure MAST inflation. In addition, most of the results were obtained solely after leg compartment inflation (Fig 4). This also is suggested in three additional patients, who exhibited the same trend of a decreased paradoxic pulse after 1 L of rapid colloid infusion (Fig 5). For these patients we have no additional information regarding variation of pleural pressure due to eventual airway obstruction improvement. A decrease in paradoxic pulse was, however, observed after the very short time necessary to infuse 250 ml and no clinically detectable modification in the degree of airway obstruction was observed. Paradoxic pulse is not a usual feature ofhypovolemia. However, MAST may correct paradoxic pulse in asthma by increasing systemic venous return without modifying airway obstruction. Thus, we can state that paradoxic pulse in asthma is due to the combination of airway obstruction and insufficient systemic venous return, that may be absolute (true hypovolemia) or relative in face ofincreased right ventricular afterload. These findings are consistent with other reports in cardiac tamponade where a decreased systemic venous return was shown to be an important factor in the genesis of paradoxic pulse.»:l2 The combined effects of asthma on systemic venous return, right heart, pulmonary capillary bed, pulmonary vein and left heart result in paradoxic pulse but the contribution of each specific effect is not known. In asthma, as in other situations of acute pulmonary hypertension, the · stroke volume is preserved though enlargement of the RV (Frank-Starling mechanism). Several inconstant factors reported during an asthmatic attack may act as limiting factors for such a RV dilation: hypovolemia, 33•34 tachycardia, 20 •21 lung hyperinflation, a.~ pericardia} stretching by thoracic hyperinflation35 or inspiratory collapse of the IVC. 20 •21 The positive abdominal pressure during inspiration also may affect venous leg return. The cumulative effect of these factors might induce a fall of inspiratory RV ejection and stroke output. The MAST inflation may restore a more adequate preload against hyperinflated lung-induced RV overload. The inspiratory collapse of the IVC is not necessarily the major cause of inspiratory decrease in RV filling; MAST inflation may maintain IVC open CHEST I 97 I 2 I FEBRUARY. 1990

381

a longer period of time during inspiration by increasing leg and abdominal venous pressure. Therapeutic Consequences Our patients all had evidence of severe asthma with alveolar hypoventilation and presumably inadequate cardiovascular adaptation as shown by metabolic acidosis with hyperlactacidemia, marked tachycardia, large paradoxic pulse and reduced inspiratory pulse pressure. Hyperlactacidemia in status asthmaticus is of debated mechanisms, 36-40 but a moderately increased cardiac output, insufficient in regard to hypoxemia and increased metabolic demands, has been reported. 20 The filling test with MAST in8ation improves cardiovascular adaptation during severe bronchial asthma. Nevertheless, increasing lung blood volume could potentially increase the pulmonary capillary pressure and the risk of bronchial or interstitial edema. 9 Alveolar capillary bed is exposed to alveolar pressure. However, we know little about the mean intra-alveolar pressure during acute asthma. 21 ·35 At inspiration, if air enters the alveolus in spite of bronchoconstriction, mean intra-alveolar pressure is obviously more negative than in the normal lung, but with hyperinRation, lung compliance decreases and then transpulmonary pressure (alveolar minus pleural pressures) becomes more negative. Thus, markedly negative pleural pressure might produce a strong pressure gradient between the capillary bed and LV promoting LV venous return rather than interstitial extravasation. However, it has been shown recently that patients with severe COPD and ischemic heart disease may exhibit LV failure that requires diuretics when LV is afterloaded by elevated transdiaphragmatic pressure (weaning from mechanical ventilation)41·42 and supports the hypothesis of an increased risk of pulmonary edema. In asthma, acute pulmonary edema has never been reported. Possibilities include the young age of these patients, the absence of prior LV diseases, and the high level of endogeneous and exogeneous J3 2-agonists. The role of superimposed hypovolemia and the possibly increased transpulmonary pressure protecting capillary bed from extravasation further protects them against pulmonary edema. In our patients with presumably normal heart, the net effect of both increased transpulmonary and transdiaphragmatic pressure seems predominantly an impaired LV filling in spite of an increased LV afterload. It also has been argued that coronary insufficiency may occur during severe asthma1·2 but this has not been substantiated in the literature. In our study, three patients had inspiratory diastolic radial pressure lower than 60 mm Hg and inadequate coronary blood Row might participate in cardiac dysfunction. We have no data regarding LV coronary perfusion pressure (ie, 382

diastolic aortic pressure minus LV intramural diastolic pressure), but it is expected to be normal because of the negative LV intramural diastolic pressure during inspiration. 20 In contrast, RV coronary perfusion may be more markedly impaired in the face of increased oxygen demand due to RV overload. In RV, myocardial perfusion is both systolic and diastolic. 43 The decrease in inspiratory stroke volume causes a more important decrease in systemic arterial pressure than in RV intramural systolic pressure so that RV systolic coronary perfusion pressure may decrease. In our study, MAST inftation was of too short duration to in8uence significantly coronary perfusion, but prolonged MAST in8ation or Ruid therapy could nevertheless increase RV coronary (and also diaphragmatic) systolic perfusion pressure in such patients. In conclusion, the present study suggests that inadequate cardiac filling may be the predominant factor responsible for paradoxic pulse during a severe asthma attack. The finding is of therapeutic value in the presence of circulatory failure. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: We gratefully acknowledge James L. Jardin, M.D., for critical review of Rohotham, M.D., and Fran~·ois the manuscript. We also are indebted to Philippe Manet, M.D., and Jean Fran~is Formela, M.D., for assistance in analyzing data.

REFERENCES 1 Hopewell PC, Miller RT. Pathophysiology and management of severe asthma. Clio Chest Med 1984; 5:623-34 2 Dugue P, Ohresser P, Orehek J, Charpin J. Physiopathologie de l'etat de mal asthmatique. Bull Europ Physiopath Respir 1978; 14:347-66 3 Stempel DA, Mellon M. Management of acute severe asthma. Pediatr Clio North Am 1984; 31:879-90 4 Dornhorst AC. Pulsus paradoxus. Intensive Care Med 1986; 12:387-88 5 Shim C, Williams H. Pulsus paradoxus in asthma. Lancet 1978; 1:530-31 6 Knowles GK, Clark TJ. Pulsus paradoxus as a valuable sign indicating severity of asthma. Lancet 1973; 2:1356-59 7 Rebuck AS, Pengelly LD. Development of pulsus paradoxus in the presence of airways obstruction. N Eng! J Med 1973; 288:6669 8 Martin J, Jardim J, Sampson M, Engel LE. Factors influencing pulsus paradoxus in asthma. Chest 1981; 80:543-49 9 Stalcup SA, Mellins RB. Mechanical forces producing pulmonary edema in acute asthma. N Eng! J Med 1977; 297:592-95 10 Ruskin J, Bache RJ, Rembert JC, Greenfield JC. Effect of respiration on left ventricule stroke volume. Circulation 1973; 48:79-85 11 Rohotham JL, Mitzner W. A model of the effects of respiration on left ventricular performance. J Appl Physiol1979; 46:411-18 12 Rohotham JL, Lixfield W, Holland L, Mac Gregor D, Bryan CA, Rabson J. Effects of respiration on cardiac performance. J Appl Physiol 1978; 44:703-09 13 Rohotham JL, Wise RA, Bromberger-Barnea B. Effects of changes in abdominal pressure on left ventricular performance and regional blood Row. Crit Care Med 1985; 13:803-09 14 ScharfSM, Brown R, Saunders N, Green LH. Effects of normal and loaded spontaneous inspiration on cardiovascular function. J Appl Physiol1979; 47:582-88 15 Parsons GH, Green JF. Mechanisms of pulsus paradoxus in upper airway obstruction. J Appl Physiol1978; 45:598-603 Deaeased

Paradoxic Pulse In Sewre Aslhma (Squara et al)

16 Brinker JA, Weiss JL, Lappe DL, Rabson JL, Summer WR, Permutt S, et al. Leftward septal displacement during right ventricular loading in man. Circulation 1980; 61:~2 17 Buda AJ, Pinsky MR, Ingels NB, Daughters GT, Stinson EB, Alderman EL. Effect of intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular performance. N Eng! J Med 1979; 301:453-59 18 Scharf SM, Brown R, Tow DE, Parisi AF. Cardiac effects of increased lung volume and decreased pleural pressure in man. J Appl Physiol1979; 47:257-62 19 Robotham JL, Rabson J, Permutt S, Bromberger-Barnea B. Left ventricular hemodynamics during respiration. J Appl Physiol 1979; 47:1295-1303 20 Jardin F, Farcot JC, Boisante L, Prost JF, Gueret P, Bourdarias JP. Mechanism of paradoxic pulse in bronchial asthma. Circulation 1982; 66:887-94 21 Jardin F, Dubourg 0, Margairaz A, Bourdarias JP. Inspiratory impainnent in right ventricular perfonnance during acute asthma. Chest 1987; 92:789-95 22 Payen DM, Brun-Buisson C, Carli P, Huet Y, Levie) F, Cinotti L, et al. Hemodynamic, gas exchange and hormonal consequences of LBPP during PEEP ventilation. J Appl Physiol1987; 62:61-70 23 Kravik SE, Keil LC, Geelen G, Wade CE, Barnes PR, Spaul WA, et al. Effects of antigravity suit inflation on cardiovascular PRA and PVP responses in humans. J Appl Physiol1986; 61:76674 24 Anderson JV, Millar ND, O'Hare JP, Mackenzie JC, Corral) RJ, Bloom SR. Atrial natriuretic peptide: physiological release associated with natriuresis during water immersion in man. Clin Sci 1986; 71:319-22 25 Solomon LR, Atherton JC, Bobinski H, Green R. Effect of posture on plasma immunoreactive atrial natriuretic peptide concentration in man. Clin Sci 1986; 71:299-305 26 Norsk P, Ronde-Petersen F, WarbergJ. Central venous pressure and plasma arginine vasopressin during water immersion in man. Eur J Appl Physiol1985; 54:71-78 27 Dhainaut JF, Catoire P, Brunet F, Huyghebaert MF, Dall'ava J, Monsallier JF. Evaluation of right ventricular contractile fum.~ tion using end-systolic pressure volume relationships in patients with septic shock. Am Rev Respir Dis (Abstract). 1988; 137:114 28 Brower R, Wise RA, Hassapoyannes C, Bromberger-Barnea B,

29

30 31 32 33

34 35

36

37 38

39

40

41 42

43

Permutt S. Effect of lung inflation on lung blood volume and pulmonary venous How. J Appl Physiol 1985; 58:954-63 Mintz GS, Morris NK, Parry WR, Iskandrian AS, Kane SA. Real time inferior vena caval ultrasonography: normal and abnormal 6ndings and its use in assessing right-heart function. Circulation 1981; 64:1018-25 Shabetai R, Fowler NO, Fenton JC, Mazangkay M. Pulsus paradoxus. J Clin Invest 1965; 44:1882-98 Shabetai R, Fowler NO, Guerun M. The effect of respiration on aortic pressure and How. Am Heart J 1963; 65:525-33 Shabeta'i R, The hemodynamics of cardiac tamponade. Am J Cardiol1970; 26:480-89 Straub PW. Bohlman AA, Rossier PH. Hypovolemia in status asthmaticus. Lancet 1969; 2:923-26 Straub PW. Biihlman AA. Reduction of blood volume by voluntary hyperventilation. J Appl Physiol1970; 29:816-17 Permutt S. Relation between pulmonary arterial pressure and pleural pressure during the acute asthmatic attack. Chest 1973; 63:25s-27s Shires R, Jaffe BT. Metabolic studies in acute asthma before after treatment. Br J Dis Chest 1979; 73:66-70 Appel D, Rubenstein R, Schrager K, Williams MH. Lactic acidosis in severe asthma. Am J Med 1983; 75:580-84 Jardin F, Barthelemy M. Frequence de l'acidose metabolique au cours de l'etat de mal asthmatique. Presse Med 1977; 6:32932 Ron,:oroni AJ, Adrogue HJ, De Obrutsky, Marchisio ML, Herrera MR. Metabolic acidosis in status asthmaticus. Respiration 1976; 33:85-94 Braden GL, Johnston SS, Germain MJ, Fitzgibbons JP, Dawson JA. Lactic acidosis associated with the therapy of acute bronchospasm. N Eng) J Med 1985; 313:890-91 Permutt S. Circulatory effects of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:157-60 Lemaire F, Teboul JL, Cinotti L, Giotto G, Abrouk F, Steg G, et al. Acute left ventricular dysfunction during unsuccessful weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:171-79 Foex P. Right ventricular contraction. In Vincent JL, Suter PM. Update in intensive care and emergeD(.')' medicine, vol2. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987:72-80

CHEST I 97 I 2 I FEBRUARY, 1990

383