137
Equilibria, 27 (1986)137-151 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.. Amsterdam -Printedin The Netherlands
FluidPhase
DENSITIES AND HEAT CAPACITIES OF l-BUTANOL + n-DECANE FROM 298
K TO 400
K
JEFFREY A. GATES and ROBERT H. WOD Department of Chemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716 (USA)
JOSE CARLOS COBOS and CARLOS CASANOVA Departamento de Termologia, Universidadde Valladolid,Valladolid (Spain)
ALAINH.
ROUX, GERKVIEVE RUJX-DESGRANOESandJLAN-PIERRB E.GROLIER
Laboratoire de Thermodynamiqueet Cinetique Chimique, Universite de ClermontFerrand 2, 63170 Aubiire (France).
INTRODUCTION In our continuing effort to provide data for binary mixtures of type alcohol + an n-alkane we report here results of experimental measurements of density and heat capacity in a range of temperatures and pressures. Density measurementswere made with a new flow vibrating-tubedensimeter for operation to high temperatures and pressures constructed at the University of Delaware. Densities for pure l-butanol, pure n-decane and their binary mixtures were determined from 298 K to 400 K,
in the range of pressures 0.1 to 20 M Pa for
the pure liquid components and at pressures slightly above atmosphericpressure for the binaries. Volumetric heat capacities, Cp/V (Cp and V being the molar heat capacity at constant pressure and molar volume respectively), were measured with a new scanning calorimeter which can be operated from 278 to 358 K at atmospheric pressure ; these measurementswere made on pure components as well as their binary mixtures. EXPERIMENTAL
Densitg measurements Two flow vibrating-tubadensimeters were used. Density measurementsat pressure higher than atmospheric pressure were made at
the
University
of
Delaware with the densimeter described in details by Albert and Wood (1984). The problem of operating the densimeter in such a way to use water as the calibratingreference liquid has been solved by means of two sample-loops put in series and using an intermediate(water miscible) reference liquid (Albert
0378-3812/86/$03.50
0 1986 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
138 et al., 1985). A deneimeter of the Picker design (SODEV model 02D) was used at the University of Clermont-Ferrand, for measurements at 298.15 K and atmospheric pressure ;
details on this densimeter and its operation can be
found in the literature : for example Picker et al., (1974).
Voluwtric heat capacity aasuracnts Measurements of volumetric heat capacities at atmospheric pressure were made at the University of Clermont-Ferrand using a new differential scanning calorimeter (SETARAM) described elsewhere (Benoist et al., 1983 ; Roux et al., 1983). The main features are the sample size (-1 cm31 and the liquid thermostat.
A
liquid thermostat insures the thermal equilibrium of the
detection block to better than 1 m K.
The temperature of the block can be
controlled and programmedupon both heating and cooling. For a typical run the liquid sample being in the measuring cell,
the reference liquid in the
reference cell, the temperatureof the detection block containing the two cells is programmed with steps at definite values. At each step a small temperature increment is produced in order to perform the actual measurement of heat capacity.
All the operations,
e.g.
temperature scanning between steps,
temperature increments at each individual step,
data acquisition and data
hendling to obtain the volumetric heat capacity are monitored by means of a computer (H.P. 85). The apparatushas been operated in the range 278-358 K, the observed sensibility being 0.2 uW.
Liquid components used at University of Delaware were Fisher certified ACS grade ;
l-butanol with stated maximum water content 0.1 mole per cent and
n-decane with stated purity 99.4 moles per cent. Liquid components used at the University of Clermont-Ferrandwere from Fluka ;
l-butanol puriss grade with
stated purity >99 moles per cent and n-decane purum grade with stated purity >99roles per cent. All liquids were dried with molecular seive and used without further purification. Their densities and heat capacities were in all cases in good agreenantwith literature data as indicated in the following section.
RgsuLTs Experimentaldensities,o,and molar heat capacities, Cp of pure liquid components at atmospheric pressure are given in Table 1 with some literature values for comparison. Experimental densities of pure components at various temperatwes and pressures are given in Table 2.
139 TABLE 1 Experimental densities, p, and molar heat capacities, C at atmospheric P' pressure of I-butanol and n-decane.
P
cP
kg.m -3
J.K-'. mol-'
T
K
This work
I-butanol
n-decane
Literature
This work
Literature
805.75a
176.67
177.02b
323.15
195.78
197.61'
348.15
217.38
368.15
234.23
298.15
805.65
298.15
726.18
726.30'
313.56
314.549
726.25d
314.47h
726.11e
313.93i
726.22f 323.15
325.77
348.15
339.18
368.15
350.96
a Hales and Ellender (1976).
b
327.00h
Counsel1 et al. (1965). ' Selected Values (1953)
d Riddick and Bunger (1970). e Goates et al. (1979) f Hutchings and Van Hook (1985). g Selected Values (1979) h Measerly et al. (1967). i Grolier et al. (1984).
P
19.8
0.7
9.7
740.95
806.02
813.20
820.06
20.5
0.2
10.2
20.5
19.8
9.7
734.01
10.2
P
0.6
FI
726.64
P k9.m-3
0.2
p1Pa
298.14 K
K P
801.40
794.16
786.74
723.11
715.52
707.44
kg.ni3
-
323.16
9.4
0.7
P
19.9
9.5
0.4
19.9
W
P
K
783.05
773.95
765.60
l-BUTANOL
20.17 20.19
10.1
0.5
20.0
10.1
696.97
706.34
a.5
P M Pa
688.17
n-DECANE
k9.ni3
-
348.16 P
K
767.55 767.59
757.86
747.52
692.95
683.40
672.39
k9i3
368.16
K
19.0 19.3
9.8 9.9
1.7
739.14 739.52
728.10 728.15
717.75
670.45 671.10
658.56 658.86 660.05 9.55 9.62 10.37
19.13 19.82
647.68
k9si3
P
399.81
1.7
P irl
Experimental densities, p, of liquid components at various temperatures and pressures.
TABLE 2
141 Excess molar volumes
(1)
VE = v - XI Vl - (1 - Xl) v2
were obtained from the densities of the mixtures according to relation
VE=xlMI
where Vi,
-1 -1 (P -PI I+
(I-
-1 -1 xl) M2 (P -P2 1
Mi and pi denote respectively the molar volume,
(2)
molar mass and
density of pure corrponenti (1 for l-butanol, 2 for n-decane) and XI is the mole fraction of l-butanol. Values of VE (Table 3) for l-butanol + n-decane for different sets of temperatures and pressures are shown in Fig. quantities were
fitted by
1.
For each set,
the excess
the method of unweighed least-squares with
a
smoothing polynomial of the type
VE = x1 (1 - xl) X Ai (1 - 2 x/ i=O
(3)
The coefficientsAi and the correspondingstandard deviations, s. are given in Table 4. These coefficientswere used to calculate the curves shown in Fig. 1. Molar heat capacities of pure components at various temperatures end atmospheric pressure are given graphically in Figs. 2 and 3. In these figures, the curves have been obtained by least-squaressmoothing of our data using the polynomial
Cp/J.K-1. mol-' = 1 Co (T/K-273.15) i=O
(4)
Correspondingcoefficientsare as follows : for l-butanol Co = 158.22; . Cl = 706.06 x 1O-3 ; C2 = 104.81 x 10-5 with standard deviation -3 o = 0.33 J.K-'.mol-' and for n-decane Co = 302.57 ; Cl = 415.46 x 10 ; C2 = 987.98 x lO-6 with standard deviation o= 0.058 J.K-'.mol-'.
Densities and volumetric heat capacities of pure liquids as well as of binary mixtures have been combined to capacities,C
generate a
series of
molar heat
at 298.15. 323.15, 348.15 and 368.15 K and atmosphericpressure P' E as well as the corresponding excess molar heat capacitie8.C given in P' Table 5.
142 TABLE 3 Excess molar volumes VE for I-butanol (I) + n-decane (2) at different temperaturesand pressures.
298.15 K
323.16 K
348.16 K
368.16 K
0.1 kl Pa
0.7 M Pa
0.4
0.5 PI Pa
VE
Xl
The
VE
Xl
-1 Ul13.11101
MPa
VE
VE
-1 Cll13.1d
-1 Cli13.11101
-1 cm3.nl,l
0.0456
0.0842
0.0489
0.1617
0.3530
0.4988
0.1387
0.2385
0.1358
0.3667
0.6276
0.9094
0.2551
0.3195
0.2456
0.5004
0.7955
1.1697
0.2910
0.3432
0.2748
0.5343
0.8118
1.1835
0.3925
0.3707
0.3933
0.5283
0.8846
1.2598
0.5475
0.3494
0.5538
0.5426
0.8307
1.1638
0.6553
0.3131
0.6555
0.4448
0.7142
1.0079
0.8564
0.1626
0.8671
0.2224
0.3357
0.4831
CpE
values were obtained according to CE P
=cP-x1 cPl -
(1 - x,1 co
(5)
where C refers to the mixture and subscripts 1 and 2 refer to l-butanol and P n-&cane respectively. At each temperatureand for each mixture, the excess quantities were fitted by the method of unweighed
least-squares with a
smoothingpolynomialof the type CE P
=
x1
(1 - xl)
!
i-0
Bi
(,‘+
(6)
143
Fig. I. Excess molar volumes Vg of I-butanol (1) + n-decane (2). Points are our experimntal data :V, at 298.15 K and 0.1 M Pa ;
0
,at 323.16 K and 0.7 M Pa ;A,
0
, at368.16K
at 348.16 K and 0.4 M Pa ;
and0.5MPa.
Curves represent the smoothing equation (3) with the coefficients given in Table 4.
240
16
Fig. 2. Hofar heat capacity of I-butanal aa a function of tamllerature. r)oint;s are our experimental data : l Using our density niewumments ;
0 using densities Literature
(2X%).
data : Z5 from Counsel1 et ax. (1965).
Curve represents +??Xt.
of Wales and Ellen&r
the smootking eqtiatian (4) witb the coefficients
given in the
145
50
0
Fig. 3. Molar heat capacity of n-decane
as a function
of temperature.
Points are our experimental data : l using our density measurements ; 0
using densities from Selected Values (1953).
Literature data
: A from Messerly et al. (1967).
Curve revesents the smoothing equation (4) with the coefficients given in the text.
146 TABLE 4 CoefficientsAi and standard deviations s for least-squaresrepresentations by smoothing equation (3), of ?
of I-butanol (1) + n-decane (2) at
different temperaturesand pressures.
A2
Al
*0
*3
A4
s
*5
&l-l
.~___________-.____-___-_~---~-~~-298.15 K
$)
1.4510
6.3827
0.3369
0.0072
2.2222
0.8048
0.5132
0.0011
3.4753
1.0472
4.8807
1.6693
3.1 M Pa
323.16 K 3.7 M Pa
348.16 K
2.4459
2.3390
0.0065
2.3586
3.0329
0.014
0.4 M Pa
368.16 K
9.1721
-
0.5 M Pa
The corresponding coefficients and standard deviations are given
in
Table 6. The C E curves are shown graphicallyin Fig. 4. P As can be seen from Fig. 1, althagh proper effects due to small pressure changes may not
be
negligible,
temperature, the maximum of
the
VE(x)-curve E
alcohol concentrations. At first, C
VE
appears to
increase with
being slightly shifted toward low increases strongly with increasing
temperature(see Fig. 4). However, fromThe measurementsat 369 K, the onset of a decrease of this quantity is evident.
In addition,
an
increasingly
significantnegative region of CpE(x) at low alcohol concentrationis observed. This negative region is a consequenceof the strong non-idealitywhich results from the formation of hydrogen bonds between alcohol molecules in both the pure liquid and the solution. The rather umymmetrical behavior of excess properties of alcohol + n-alkane solutions was predicted by Kehiaian and Treszczanowicz (19691,
using a simple association model and experimentally
shown by the early measurementsof Woycicka and Recko (1972) and Kalinowskaand
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.6
1 Xl
Fig. 4. Excess molar heat capacities CpE at atmospheric pressure of butanol (1)
t n-decane (2). Points are our experimentaldata
A,
et 348.15 K
; 0,
: V , at 298.15 K ; 0,
at 323.15 K
;
at 368.15 K. Curves represent the moothing equation (6)
with the coefficientsgiven in Table 6.
148 Modem
Woycicka
(1973).
capacities
have
permitted
solutions.
In
particular,
extremums (Roux-Desgranges the strong
self
the
concentration
terms
self
association
present
work
calorimetry
in
investigations
confirms
partial
of
that
of association
in
for
accurately
the very
and apparent 1985
the
Costas
and Patterson
alcohol ccupled
heat
flow
temperature
through
densitorretry
range
is
phenomena in alcohol
likely
of
show sharp
with
the
aid
molar heat
+ n-decane
(2)
capacities
at different
of
heat
to the
capacities
hydrogen and to
bonds.
(heat boost
in Our
capacity) theoretical
solutions.
E -1 C in J.K . mol -’ for 1-butanol (1) P temperatures and atmospheric pressure.
298.15 K
323.15 K
348.15 K
358.15 K
0.0456
8.96
8.20
2.65
0.16
0.1387
13.23
17.70
17.19
9.88
0.2551
14.61
20.86
23.50
20.23
0.2910
14.70
21.09
24.19
21.70
0.3925
14.81
21.20
25.04
24.31
0.5475
13.44
19.22
22.94
23.06
0.6553
11.58
16.81
20.13
20.23
0.8564
5.48
8.58
10.59
11.05
Xl
of
have quantitatively
TABBLE 5 Excess
heat
alcohol
1985) attributed
(1985)
dependence
solutions
region
capacities
Recently ,
alcohol.
measuring
dilute
; Tanaka et al.,
and temperature in
an extended
data
et al.,
model,
explained
techniques
take
association
Kehiaian-Treszczanowicz
of
flow to
I
498.40 182.23
-827.12
-245.90
298.15
323.15
348.15 368.75 7640.52
-2466.13
-26626.7
-2296.24
399.84
8262.07
3550.07
-2008.84
1173.91
40847.3
3083.11
-2867.59
0.22
0.27
-30545.4
8988.5
0.27
0.10
-1308.62
869.62
(CpE) J.K-' .mol -'
s
Coefficients Bi and standard deviationss for least-squares representations by smoothing equation E of I-butanol (1) + n-decane (2) at different temperatures and atmospheric pressure. of c P
TABLE 6 (6),
150
We gratefully ackmwledge the assistance of the France-American Commissionof the Directionde la Cooperationet des RelationsInternationales (Ministere de 1'EducationNaticnale) and of the Cormnission des Relations Internationales (Universitdde Clermont-Ferrand 2) during the realizationof this work. This work was supportedby the NationalScience Fundationunder grant numberCHE 800 96 72. Financialsupportreceivedwithin the frameworkof the Spanish-Frenchprogram for scientificand technicalcooperation("Action IntigrQ" between UniversiM
de
Clermont-Ferrand2
and Universidad de
Valladolid)is also gratefullyacknowledged.
Albert,J.H. and Wood, R-H., 1984. Rev. Sci. Instrum.,55(O) :
589-593.
Albert, J.H., Gates, J.A., Wood, R.H. and Grolier,J.-P.E.,1985.Fluid Phase Equilibria,20 : 321-330. Benoist,L., Mercier,J., Roux, A.H., Roux-Desgranges, G. and Grolier,J.-P.E., 1983. 5 ConvegnoNazionaledi Calorimetriaad AnalisiTermica (AICAT), Trieste (14-16December1983)
Cc&as,
M.
:
240-243.
and Patterson,D., 1985.J. Chem. Sot. FaradayTrans.I, 81 : 635-
654. Counsell, J.F.. Hales, J.L. and Martin,J.F., 1965. Trans.Farad. Sot. 61 : 1869-1875. Goat.!%., J.R., Ott, J.B. and Grigg, R.B., 1979. J. Chem. Thwmodyn.,
13 : 907-
913. Crolier, J.-P.E.,Inglese.A. and Wilhelm,A., 1984. J. Chem. Thermodyn.,16 : 67-n. Hales, J.L. and Ellen&r, J.H., 1976. J. Chem. Thermodyn.,8 : 1177-1184. Hutchings,R.S.,andVm Hook, W.A., Kalimwska, B. and Woycicka,M., 845-850.
1973.
1985.
Fluid Phase Equilibria,21 : 166-170.
Bull. Acad. Polon.Sci. Ser. Chim., 21 :
151
Kehiaian, H. and Treszczanowicz, A.J., 1969. Bull. Sot. Chim. France, 5 : 1561-1568.
Messerly, J .F., Guthrie, G.B., Todd, S.S.
and Finke, H.T., 1967. J. Chem. Eng.
Data, 12 : 338-346. Picker, P., Tremblay. E. and Jolicoeur, C., 1974. J. Solution Chem., 3 : 3i’7384.
Riddick, J.A. and Bunger, W.B.. 1970. Organic Solvents (3rd edn.) Tech. Chem. Ser., Vol. 2, Wiley-Interscience, New-York.
Roux, A.H., Roux-Dasgranges, G., Grolier, J.-P.E. and Viallard, A., 1983. Calorinetrieet Analyss Thermique.Journ6es de La Gaillarde (16-17 May 1963). Volume XIV : 142-150.
Roux-Desgranges,G., Grolier, J.-P.E., Villamanan,M.A. and Casanova,C., 1985. Fluid Phase Equilibria (in press).
Selected Values of PhYsical and Thermodynamic Properties of
Hydrocarbons and
Related Corrpounds, 1953. American Petroleum InstituteReserach Project 44. Carnegie Press. Pittsburg. Table 20d (part 11, p. 288.
Selected Values of Properties of Hydrocarbonsand Related Conpounds. American Petroleum Institute Research Project 44.
Thermodynamic Research
Center, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas. Table 23-2 (l-2051,page 1, dated 31 October 1979.
Tanaka, R., Toyama, S. and Murskami, S., 1965. Chemistry Letters : 943-944.
Woycicka, M.K. and Recko, W.M., 783-788.
1972. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Ser. Chim., 20 :