Detection and Control of a Nosocomial Respiratory Syncytial Virus Outbreak in a Stem Cell Transplantation Unit: The Role of Palivizumab

Detection and Control of a Nosocomial Respiratory Syncytial Virus Outbreak in a Stem Cell Transplantation Unit: The Role of Palivizumab

Detection and Control of a Nosocomial Respiratory Syncytial Virus Outbreak in a Stem Cell Transplantation Unit: The Role of Palivizumab Christelle Kas...

179KB Sizes 1 Downloads 32 Views

Detection and Control of a Nosocomial Respiratory Syncytial Virus Outbreak in a Stem Cell Transplantation Unit: The Role of Palivizumab Christelle Kassis,1 Richard E. Champlin,2 Ray Y. Hachem,1 Chitra Hosing,2 Jeffrey J. Tarrand,3 Cheryl A. Perego,1 Joyce L. Neumann,2 Issam I. Raad,1 Roy F. Chemaly1 Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common community-acquired virus that causes upper and lower respiratory tract infections in children, hematologic malignancy patients, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Nosocomial transmission of RSV in immunocompromised patients can significantly affect morbidity, mortality, and duration of hospitalization. Stringent infection control measurements are needed to control further hospital transmission. Prophylactic palivizumab was found to result in a significant reduction in hospitalization rates in high-risk children. In this article, we report a nosocomial outbreak of RSV in an adult HSCT unit (4 pods) from January 16 to February 4, 2004, including the infection control interventions used and the prophylactic administration of palivizumab in high-risk patients. Active surveillance identified 5 cases, a substantial increase from previous seasons (2 or 3 cases per season). All infected patients were isolated to 1 nursing pod and placed on contact isolation. All patients on the HSCT unit underwent rapid RSV antigen screening using nasal washes; this was repeated 1 week later, and 1 additional RSV case was identified. Patients identified to be at increased risk for RSV infection received prophylactic palivizumab. Routine screenings of the staff and visitors were undertaken. All patient and visitor areas were thoroughly cleaned with bleach. We educated health care workers about RSV transmission, highlighting proper hand hygiene and contact precautions. Four of 6 patients with RSV infection developed RSV pneumonia, and 2 of these patients died. Staff and visitors with upper respiratory symptoms were screened, and all were negative for RSV. Prophylactic palivizumab was administered in 16 patients who tested negative for RSV, but were considered to be at increased risk for RSV infection. None of these patients developed RSV infections. An RSV outbreak was controlled using prompt preventive measures, including cohorting patients, with a dedicated health care staff; contact isolation of patients; strict adherence to hand hygiene; and screening of visitors, family members, and health care staff for upper respiratory infection symptoms. Immunoprophylaxis with palivizumab, administered to high-risk patients, complemented strict infection control intervention. Thus, the role of palivizumab in the control of RSV hospital outbreaks merits further investigation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16: 1265-1271 (2010) Ó 2010 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

KEY WORDS: Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Outbreak

INTRODUCTION From the 1Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 2Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Financial disclosure: See Acknowledgments on page 1270. Correspondence and reprint requests: Roy F. Chemaly, MD, MPH, Department of Infectious Disease, Infection Control and Employee Health, Unit 402, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030 (e-mail: [email protected]). Received January 8, 2010; accepted March 10, 2010 Ó 2010 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation 1083-8791/$36.00 doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.03.011

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a well-known cause of lower respiratory tract infections in young children [1], and is now increasingly recognized as an important cause of respiratory infections in adults, especially in the elderly and immunocompromised patients [2]. By the age of 2 years, almost all children have been infected with RSV [3], but naturally acquired immunity is incomplete, and reinfection is common [4]. The clinical features of reinfections are generally mild in immunocompetent patients, and the duration of viral shedding is relatively short. However, RSV infections have been associated with high morbidity and mortality rates (70%-100%) and prolonged viral shedding in both autologous and allogeneic adult stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients [5,6]. The 1265

C. Kassis et al.

disease incidence varies seasonally, with a peak from November to April in the northern hemisphere. Outbreaks of RSV infections have been reported among nursing home patients and institutionalized young adults [7-9], but few reports have documented nosocomial RSV outbreaks among HSCT patients [10-12]. Active infection control surveillance strategies of RSV and other community-acquired respiratory viruses play crucial roles in identifying nosocomial transmission and controlling outbreaks. Studies have suggested that hand washing after patient contact, the use of gowns and gloves, and cohorting of staff and patients are effective preventive strategies [13,14]. Palivizumab (Synagis. MedImmune, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA) is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the F glycoprotein of RSV; it was approved for the prophylaxis of RSV disease in high-risk infants [15-17]. However, its effectiveness in high-risk adults has never been evaluated. In this article, we describe an outbreak of nosocomial RSV among HSCT unit patients at our institution, which was managed using strict infection control interventions and palivizumab immunoprophylaxis in high-risk adult HSCT patients.

METHODS Epidemiologic Investigation The HSCT unit at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, Texas) is a 52-bed unit divided into 4 pods (NE, NW, SW, and SE). From October through March each year, we monitor community- or hospital-acquired respiratory viral infections in hematologic malignancy patients. Patients with symptoms of upper respiratory infection undergo RSV and influenza screening, performed using rapid antigen tests and cultures of nasal washes. At our institution, the incidence of hospitalacquired RSV infection peaks in January and February, with a steady rate of 0.2 and 0.3/1000 patients’ days in 2002 and 2003, respectively (Figure 1). However, in January and February 2004, active surveillance of symptomatic patients identified 5 HSCT patients with nosocomial RSV infections. This number represented a substantial increase in incidence of hospital-acquired RSV (0.74/1000 patients’ days) when compared to that of previous seasons. We initiated strict infection control measures and investigated the outbreak on February 4th. Identification of Additional Cases Nasal washes from all HSCT patients on all 4 pods were collected and sent for rapid RSV antigen screening tests on February 4th; the same day strict infection

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16:1265-1271, 2010

Infections per 1000 pt days

1266

0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 2002

2003

2004

Figure 1. Incidence of nosocomial RSV in stem cell transplant unit during the last 3 winter seasons

control measures were implemented. All health care workers who reported upper respiratory symptoms were restricted from patient contact and underwent rapid RSV antigen testing. A sign was placed at the entrance of each pod that stated that all visitors and family members were required to checkin at the nurses’ station prior to entering patient rooms. A questionnaire, ‘‘Visitor Questionnaire for Upper Respiratory Symptoms,’’ was distributed to all visitors at the nurses’ station. The questionnaire included 2 questions: ‘‘Do you currently have symptoms of a cold, that is, are you sneezing, coughing, have a runny nose, sore throat or fever?’’ and ‘‘Have you had close contact with someone that has a cold within the past 7 days?’’ All individuals who responded yes to either question were not granted visitation. All visitors who responded no were required to wear a sticker that read, ‘‘I have been screened today (date) and I am safe.’’ The nursing staff kept a record of all visitors who had been screened for upper respiratory signs. This system ensured that everyone entering patient rooms had undergone screening. One week later after the screening process had been established, all patients underwent follow-up rapid RSV antigen screening of nasal washes. Definitions Upper respiratory RSV infection was defined as rhinorrhea, nasal or sinus congestion, otitis media, pharyngitis, or cough with a clear chest radiograph, with or without fever. RSV pneumonia was defined as an acute respiratory illness in association with signs or symptoms of lower respiratory tract disease and new radiographic infiltrates. Infection was considered nosocomial if respiratory symptoms developed .5 days after hospital admission. Laboratory Methods Nasal washes were collected for rapid antigen detection using the Light Diagnostics Simufluor RSV/ FluA immunofluorescence assay kit (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA,USA; catalog no. 3129). All specimens were placed in a viral transport medium on ice or refrigerated immediately and transported to the

RSV Outbreak in a HSCT Unit

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16:1265-1271, 2010

laboratory on ice. Specimens were treated and centrifuged into pellets; any specimens that did not contain sufficient respiratory epithelial cells were recollected. Upon treatment with the Simufluor RSV/Flu A reagent, the RSV antigen-antibody complex exhibits an apple-green fluorescence, whereas uninfected cells will stain a dull red [18]. Results were obtained within 2 hours and immediately reported to the clinician. The sensitivity and specificity of this test is between 85% and 100% [18].

1267

Infection control team was notified. Outbreak investigation was launched. All patients on all 4 pods were screened with rapid RSV Antigen test on a nasal wash

Pod NE

Pod NW

Patient 1

RESULTS

Pod SW

Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 5

Epidemiologic Investigations On January 16, 22, and 27, 2004, 3 patients admitted to the SW pod were diagnosed with nosocomial RSV infections. Patients 1 and 3 had evidence of pneumonia, whereas patient 2 had an upper respiratory infection with a negative chest X-ray. On January 28, patient 4, admitted to the SE pod, was diagnosed with pneumonia secondary to RSV. Five days later, on February 2nd, patient 5, admitted to the SW pod was diagnosed with RSV pneumonia (Figure 2). This increase in incidence of nosocomial RSV infection was higher than that in previous years, although not statistically significant. We initiated an outbreak investigation as part of our infection control plan when 2 or more nosocomial RSV or other respiratory virus infections are occurring in patients in the same vicinity and around the same period of time (Figure 1). All HSCT patients and health care workers on all 4 pods were screened using a rapid RSV antigen test of nasal washes. Six health care workers were found to have upper respiratory symptoms, but none were positive for RSV antigen. On February 4th, a sixth patient was diagnosed with a RSV upper respiratory tract infection (Figure 2). Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of all 6 patients. All patients were treated with aerosolized ribavirin and palivizumab for at least 7 days. Of the 4 patients with RSV pneumonia, 2 died. Interventions All RSV-infected patients, along with designated nurses, a respiratory care therapist, and a phlebotomist were moved to the RSV pod (SW). All patients on this pod with or without RSV infection were placed on contact isolation, with masks. No additional patients were admitted to the pod. All visitors with upper respiratory symptoms or a fever or who had been exposed to individuals with colds within the past 7 days were prohibited from entering patient rooms. The infection control practitioners conducted an intensive educational program for employees on all 4 pods that emphasized proper

Patient 4

Pod SE

Patient 6 1/16/2004 1/22/2004 1/27/2004 1/28/2004

2/2/2004

2/4/2004

Figure 2. Timeline of RSV infections among the 6 identified patients

hand hygiene, and strict adherence to contact isolation with mask. Housekeeping performed environmental decontamination with bleach, and established more frequent, rigorous cleaning schedules for patient rooms, nursing areas, restrooms, break rooms, and waiting areas. We then identified HSCT patients who may be at high risk for complications if RSV infection is acquired using the following criteria: allogeneic transplantation, preengraftment, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), high-dose steroids, or neutropenia with absolute neutrophil count \500 cells/mL. Sixteen patients met these criteria. All 16 were negative for RSV antigen and were given a single dose of 15 mg/kg of intravenous palivizumab. One week later, we performed follow-up screening of all HSCT patients; no new cases of RSV infection were identified. None of the 16 high-risk HSCT patients who had received palivizumab developed RSV infections (Tables 2 and 3 summarize all published RSV outbreaks in the pediatric and adult populations). Twenty days later, control measures were discussed and reviewed. Contact isolation was discontinued for all non-RSV-infected patients. Screening of symptomatic health care staff and visitors was continued. The use of masks and gloves during patient contact was reinforced.

DISCUSSION RSV is a frequent cause of both acute upper and lower respiratory tract infections, and the severity of clinical manifestation depends on patient age and health status. In immunocompromised patients, such as hematopoietic HSCT recipients, RSV upper respiratory disease may progress to fatal viral pneumonia [19]. In a previous study conducted at our institution,

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16:1265-1271, 2010

Sepsis complicated by multi-organ failure

C. Kassis et al.

62/ female

67/ male

Patient 5

Patient 6

All patients had an absolute lymphocyte count of <1000 cells/mL at time of diagnosis of RSV infection at a mean of 277 (range: 40-790). RSV indicates respiratory syncytial virus; CML, chronic myelogenous leukemia; HSCT, stem cell transplantation.

Upper respiratory tract infection 12 days Allogeneic matched unrelated HSCT/01/30/2004

61/ male Patient 4

CML

Pneumonia 27 days Allogeneic matched unrelated HSCT/01/07/2004

61/ male Patient 3

CML

Pneumonia 29 days Allogeneic matched unrelated HSCT/05/22/2003

26/ female Patient 2

Mantle cell Lymphoma

25 days

8 days

Upper respiratory tract infection Pneumonia

Aerosolized Ribavirin 2 gram q8 h for 10 days and Palivizumab 15 mg/kg X1 and infection resolved Aerosolized Ribavirin 2 gram q8 h for 14 days and Palivizumab 15 mg/kg X1 and infection resolved Aerosolized Ribavirin 2 gram q8 h for 14 days and IVIG 500 mg/kg q48 h for 3 doses and infection resolved Aerosolized Ribavirin 2 gram q8 h for 10 days and Palivizumab 15 mg/kg IV X1, treatment failed and patient died Aerosolized Ribavirin 2 gram q8 h for 14 days and IVIG 500 mg/kg q48 h for 3 doses, relapsed 6 days later, treatment was restated but patient died from respiratory failure Aerosolized Ribavirin 2 gram q8 h for 7 days and Palivizumab 15 mg/kg IV X1 and infection resolved Pneumonia 79 days

Allogeneic matched related HSCT/07/21/2003 Autologous peripheral HSCT/01/22/2004 Autologous peripheral HSCT/01/09/2004 Cutaneous T cell Lymphma Nodular Sclerosing Hodgkin Disease Multiple Myeloma 41/ male

Age/Gender

Patient 1

Type and Date of Transplant

Time from Admission to onset of RSV Underlying Malignancy Patients Characteristics

Table 1. Demographics and Characteristics of Patients with Nosocomial RSV Infections

Infection Type

Treatment Received and Outcome

Cause of Death

1268

RSV was isolated in 31% of 343 cases of respiratory illness from July 1, 2000, to July 30, 2002, in leukemia and HSCT patients [20]. Pneumonia developed in 36% (39 of 107) of RSV cases, and 6 of 36 (17%) patients treated for RSV pneumonia died. These high rates of pneumonia and death have been confirmed at other centers [21]. Early treatment (before respiratory failure occurs) with aerosolized ribavirin, alone or in combination with immunotherapy, is key to reducing mortality in patients with established pneumonia [22,23]. Furthermore, the early use of aerosolized ribavirin-based therapy in immunocompromised patients with isolated upper respiratory symptoms can decrease the rate of progression to pneumonia [20]. Thus, routine screening of HSCT patients with upper respiratory symptoms is important, especially during high seasonal peaks. In this article, we described an outbreak of nosocomial RSV in which 6 HSCT patients developed RSV infections. Two patients had isolated upper respiratory involvement, and 4 developed pneumonia. All 6 patients were promptly started on aerosolized ribavirin treatment, but 2 developed severe respiratory failure and died. Stringent infection control measures, including cohorting RSV-infected patients and healthy staff members to 1 pod, placing all patients on contact isolation, and screening visitors and staff, were implemented to control the outbreak. RSV is highly contagious, and rapid spread among hospitalized patients has been documented. The virus survives up to 7 hours on countertops, gloves, paper tissues, and clothes and 30 minutes on skin [24]. Transmission occurs primarily through inoculation of nasopharyngeal or ocular mucous membranes after contact with virus containing secretions or fomites [25]. Furthermore, transmission through large aerosol droplets has been implicated [26]. Hence, vigorous handwashing and strict application of contact isolation, including surgical masks and eye protection, may be the most important measures of preventing nosocomial spread [27,28]. Isolating patients and staff, in which patients are placed in private rooms or with other RSVinfected patients and health care workers are restricted from caring for uninfected patients, is extremely effective at controlling further nosocomial transmission [28,29]. Finally, restricting visitors with upper respiratory symptoms from patient contact and continuously educating all personnel and family members should be implemented in every outbreak setting [28]. However, in a recent neonatal intensive care unit RSV outbreak [30], the above infection control measures were not effective at preventing further RSV infections with significant morbidity. Palivizumab therapy was initiated for all infants admitted to the unit, and no further cases were noted. Palivizumab is

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16:1265-1271, 2010

1269

RSV Outbreak in a HSCT Unit

Table 2. Summary of RSV Outbreaks in the Pediatric Population

References (No.) Salcedo et al. [45] Cox et al. [46] Kilani [47] Heerens et al. [48] Heerens et al. [48] Abadesso et al. [30] Abadesso et al. [30] Halasa et al. [49] Kurz et al. [50]

Unit Level of Care (No. of Beds)

No. of RSV Infections after Administration of Palivizumab

No. of Infants Infected with RSV

No. of Deaths Secondary to RSV Infection

Jan-00

56

4

0

All infants

Nov/Dec 1999 2001 Feb-98

17 20 NA

7 8 3

1 1 1

8 (high risk) All infants none

0 0 N/A

Apr-98

NA

6

1

none

N/A

Nov-98 Apr-98 NA

NA 19 NA

3 8 9

0 1 0

N/A 0 0

Jan-07

11

1

0

none All infants All not infected infants All infants

Date of the Outbreak

NICU (17)/Intermediate care (15) NICU (18) NICU (20) Neonatal critical care center (NA) Neonatal critical care center (NA) NICU (26) NICU (26) NICU (37)/Intermediate care (19) NICU (12)

No. of Infants Who Received Prophylactic Palivizumab

No. of Infants on the Ward at Time of Outbreak

0

0

NICU indicates neonatal intensive care unit; NA, not available; N/A, not applicable; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.

a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits an epitope at the A antigenic site of the F protein of RSV subtypes A and B. Antibody binding to the F protein has 2 effects. First, it prevents cellular infection by preventing the viral membrane from fusing with the respiratory epithelial cell membrane. Second, it prevents cell-to-cell spread of the virus, which prevents the formation of syncytia and the release of inflammatory mediators in the lungs [31]. These properties provide the rationale for its clinical use. In the Impact-RSV trial [32], a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter study, prophylactic palivizumab resulted in a significant reduction in hospitalization rates in high-risk children; this finding led to its U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of palivizumab for RSV prophylaxis in high-risk children in June 1998. Palivizumab was administered intramuscularly each month during the cold season, at 5 doses of 15 mg/kg, in 1502 high-risk children; it resulted in a 55% reduction in the rate of RSV hospitalization (10.6% in the placebo group versus 4.8% in the palivizumab

group, P\.001). Premature children with no bronchopulmonary dysplasia experienced a 78% reduction in the RSV hospitalization rate (8.1% versus 1.8%, P \ .001), and children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia experienced a 39% reduction (12.8% versus 7.9%, P 5 .038). Subsequent studies confirmed these results [17,33-39]. The American Academy of Pediatrics acknowledges that palivizumab may be beneficial in children with severe immunodeficiencies [40]. In a decision analysis model designed to determine the effect of prophylactic palivizumab on mortality in pediatric stem cell transplant recipients, the absolute survival rate increased from 83% to 92% with palivizumab [41]. Palivizumab is used, alone or in combination with aerosolized ribavirin, in the treatment of, respectively, upper and lower RSV respiratory tract infections [20,23,42]. However, data on its use in adult HSCT patients remains limited. Palivizumab has an excellent safety profile, and may be beneficial at preventing and treating RSV infections in

Table 3. Summary of RSV Outbreaks in Adults RSV Outbreaks in Immunocompromised Adults

References

Unit Level of Care (No. of Beds)

Harrington et al. [11] BMT unit Jones et al. [51]

Date of the Outbreak

No. of Patients on the Ward at Time of Outbreak

No. of Patients Infected with RSV

Jan/Apr 1990

NA

31

Abdallah et al. [10]

Hematology/Oncology Feb/Apr 1997 ward (14) BMT unit May/Sep 2001

NA

Current study

BMT unit

52

Jan/Feb 2004

NA

No. of Patients No. of RSV No. of Deaths Who Received Infections after Secondary to Prophylactic Administration RSV Infection Palivizumab of Palivizumab 14 (all had None pneumonia) 0 None

N/A

8 (including 5 posttransplantation) 16 2 (Both had None pneumonia) 6 2 16 (high-risk)

N/A N/A 0

RSV Outbreaks in Immunocompetent Adults Sorvillo et al. [52] Huang et al. [53] Caram et al. [54]

Nursing home Psychiatry ward Long-term care facility

Mar/May Aug 2005 Jan/Feb 2008

NA 25 52

40 8 patients and 4 HCW 22

8 0 0

None None None

BMT indicates bone marrow transplant; NA, not available; N/A, not applicable; HCW, health care worker; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.

N/A N/A N/A

1270

C. Kassis et al.

immunocompromised adults but bearing in mind its prohibitive cost [43]. In the outbreak described in this article, palivizumab was prophylactically administered to all HSCT patients at high risk for RSV infection, including all allogeneic and preengraftment transplant recipients, GVHD patients on high-dose steroids, and severely neutropenic patients (absolute neutrophil count \500). No upper or lower RSV infections occurred in these patients. The use of prophylactic palivizumab may have contributed to preventing the further nosocomial spread of RSV, but the direct benefit from this intervention could not be assessed in our study as other simultaneous infection control measures were implemented as well. In conclusion, active surveillance of all symptomatic patients and health care workers, especially during RSV season, remains the cornerstone for identifying RSV outbreaks. The prevention strategy should include assiduous handwashing and strict contact isolation and mask use. Patients shed RSV asymptomatically for days before and after resolution of the infection; thus, efforts should be made to isolate these patients and assign designated personnel to care for them. Continuous screening of patients, health care workers, and visitors, especially during outbreaks, is extremely helpful in preventing further nosocomial RSV spread. Furthermore, intensive educational programs help increase awareness of RSV exposure among patients, caregivers, and family members [44]. Our experience suggests that prophylactic palivizumab should be administered to highrisk HSCT patients to contain nosocomial RSV transmission, in conjunction with the simple and inexpensive preventive measure of hand washing. Active surveillance for respiratory viruses should be implemented, as should rapid and strict adherence to all preventive infection control measures. Further studies are needed to assess the role of prophylactic palivizumab in nosocomial RSV and whether this intervention is cost effective.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Financial disclosure: The authors have nothing to disclose.

REFERENCES 1. Izurieta HS, Thompson WW, Kramarz P, et al. Influenza and the rates of hospitalization for respiratory disease among infants and young children. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:232-239. 2. Falsey AR, Treanor JJ, Betts RF, et al. Viral respiratory infections in the institutionalized elderly: clinical and epidemiologic findings. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:115-119. 3. Shay DK, Holman RC, Newman RD, et al. Bronchiolitis-associated hospitalizations among US children, 1980-1996. JAMA. 1999;282:1440-1446.

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16:1265-1271, 2010

4. Fenton C, Scott LJ, Plosker GL. Palivizumab: a review of its use as prophylaxis for serious respiratory syncytial virus infection. Paediatr Drugs. 2004;6:177-197. 5. Sable CA, Hayden FG. Orthomyxoviral and paramyxoviral infections in transplant patients. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 1995;9: 987-1003. 6. Whimbey E, Champlin R, Englund J, et al. Combination therapy with aerosolized ribavirin and intravenous immunoglobulin for respiratory syncytial virus disease in adult bone marrow transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995; 16:393. 7. Falsey AR, Hennessey PA, Formica MA, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly and high-risk adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1749-1759. 8. Osterweil D, Norman D. An outbreak of an influenza-like illness in a nursing home. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38:659-662. 9. Falsey AR. Noninfluenza respiratory virus infection in long-term care facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991;12:602-608. 10. Abdallah A, Rowland KE, Schepetiuk SK, To LB, Bardy P. An outbreak of respiratory syncytial virus infection in a bone marrow transplant unit: effect on engraftment and outcome of pneumonia without specific antiviral treatment. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;32:195-203. 11. Harrington RD, Hooton TM, Hackman RC, et al. An outbreak of respiratory syncytial virus in a bone marrow transplant center. J Infect Dis. 1992;165:987-993. 12. Jalal H, Bibby DF, Bennett J, et al. Molecular investigations of an outbreak of parainfluenza virus type 3 and respiratory syncytial virus infections in a hematology unit. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;1690-1696. 13. Isaacs D, Dickson H, O’Callaghan C, Sheaves R, Winter A, Moxon ER. Handwashing and cohorting in prevention of hospital acquired infections with respiratory syncytial virus. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:227-231. 14. Madge P, Paton JY, McColl JH, Mackie PL. Prospective controlled study of four infection control procedures to prevent nosocomial infection with respiratory syncytial virus. Lancet. 1992;340:1079-1083. 15. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases, Committee on Foetus and Newborn. Prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections: indications for the use of palivizumab and update on the use of RSV-IG IV. Pediatrics. 1998;102:1211-1216. 16. Carbonell X, Giuffre L, Kimpen J, et al. Guidelines for the use of Synagis palivizumab—a humanized monoclonal antibody, for the prevention of RSV disease in high-risk infants: a consensus opinion. Infect Med. 1999;16:1-5. 17. Meissner HC, Welliver RC, Chartrand SA, et al. Immunoprophylaxis with palivizumab, a humanized respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody, for prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection in high risk infants: a consensus opinion. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18:223-231. 18. Landry ML, Ferguson D. SimuFluor respiratory screen for rapid detection of multiple respiratory viruses in clinical specimens by immunofluorescence staining. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38:708-711. 19. Couch RB, Englund JA, Whimbey E. Respiratory viral infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised persons. Am J Med. 1997;102:2-9. 20. Chemaly RF, Ghosh S, Bodey GP, et al. Respiratory viral infections in adults with hematologic malignancies and human stem cell transplantation recipients: a retrospective study at a major cancer center. Medicine (Baltimore). 2006;85:278-287. 21. Raboni SM, Nogueira MB, Tsuchiya LR, et al. Respiratory tract viral infections in bone marrow transplant patients. Transplantation. 2003;76:142-146. 22. Whimbey E, Englund JA, Couch RB. Community respiratory virus infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer. Am J Med. 1997;102:10-18. 23. Ghosh S, Champlin RE, Englund J, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus upper respiratory tract illnesses in adult blood and marrow

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16:1265-1271, 2010

24. 25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31. 32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

transplant recipients: combination therapy with aerosolized ribavirin and intravenous immunoglobulin. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;25:751-755. Hall CB, Douglas RG Jr. Modes of transmission of RSV. J Pediatr. 1981;99:100. Hall CB, Douglas RG Jr., Schnabel KC, Geiman JM. Infectivity of respiratory RSV by various routes of inoculation. Infect Immun. 1982;33:779. Hall CB, Douglas RG Jr., Geiman JM. Quantitative shedding patterns of respiratory syncytial virus in infants. J Infect Dis. 1975;132:151. Gala CL, Hall CB, Schnabel KC, et al. The use of eye nose goggles to control nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus infection. JAMA. 1986;256:2706. Tablan OC, Anderson LJ, Besser R, et al. Guidelines for preventing health care-associated pneumonia, 2003: recommendations of CDC and healthcare infection control practice advisory committee. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004;53:1. Krasinski K, LaCouture R, Holzman RS, et al. Screening for respiratory syncytial virus and assignment to a cohort at admission to reduce nosocomial transmission. J Pediatr. 1990; 116:894. Abadesso C, Almeida HI, Virella D, Carreiro MH, Machado MC. Use of palivizumab to control an outbreak of syncytial respiratory virus in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Hospital Infect. 2004;58:38-41. Scott LJ, Lamb HM. Palivizumab. Drugs. 1999;58:305-311. The Impact-RSV Study Group. Palivizumab, a humanized respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody, reduces hospitalization from respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants. Pediatrics. 1998;102:531-537. Singelton R, Dooley L, Bruden D, et al. Impact of palivizumab prophylaxis on respiratory syncytial virus hospitalizations in high risk Alaska Native infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003;22(6): 540-555. Palivizumab Outcomes Study Group. Palivizumab prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus disease in 2000-2001: results from The Palivizumab Outcomes Registry. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003;35:484-489. Cohen AH, Sorrentino M, Powers T. Effectiveness of palivizumab for preventing serious RSV disease. J Respir Dis. 2000;2: S30-S32. Lacaze-Masmonteil T, Roze JC, Fauroux B. French Pediatricians’ Group of Synagis Patients’ Name-Based Programs. Incidence of respiratory syncytial virus-related hospitalizations in high-risk children: follow-up of a national cohort of infants treated with palivizumab as RSV prophylaxis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2002;34:181-188. Pedraz C, Carbonell-Estrany X, Figueras-Aloy J, et al. Effect of palivizumab prophylaxis in decreasing respiratory syncytial virus hospitalizations in premature infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003; 22:823-827. Grimaldi M, Gouyon B, Sagot P, et al. Palivizumab efficacy in preterm infants with gestational age \ or 5 30 weeks without bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007;42:189-192.

RSV Outbreak in a HSCT Unit

1271

39. Cohen SA, Zanni R, Cohen A, et al. Palivizumab use in subjects with congenital heart disease: results from the 20002004 Palivizumab Outcomes Registry. Pediatr Cardiol. 2008; 29:382-387. 40. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases and Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Revised indications for the use of palivizumab and respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin intravenous for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections. Pediatrics. 2003;12:1442-1446. 41. Thomas NJ, Hollenbeak CS, Ceneviva GD, et al. Palivizumab prophylaxis to prevent respiratory syncytial virus mortality after pediatric bone marrow transplantation: a decision analysis model. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2007;29:227-232. 42. Boeckh M, Berrey MM, Bowden RA, et al. Phase 1 evaluation of the respiratory syncytial virus-specific monoclonal antibody palivizumab in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:350-354. 43. Georgescu G, Chemaly RF. Palivizumab: where to from here? Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009;9:139-147. 44. Forbes M. Strategies for preventing respiratory syncytial virus. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(Suppl 8). 45. Salcedo S, Vinzo J, Calico I, et al. Administration of palivizumab during a nosocomial outbreak in a neonatal unit Abstract P241, presented at the XVII European Congress of Perinatal Medicine, Porto Portugal. Prenatal Neonatal Med. 2000;5:180. 46. Cox RA, Rao P, Brandon-Cox C. The use of palivizumab monoclonal antibody to control an outbreak of respiratory syncytial virus infection in a special care baby unit. J Hosp Infect. 2001; 48:186-192. 47. Kilani RA. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) outbreak in the NICU: description of eight cases. J Trop Pediatr. 2002;48: 118-122. 48. Heerens AT, Marshall DD, Bose CL. Nosocomial respiratory syncytial virus: a threat in the modern neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol. 2002;22:306-307. 49. Halasa NB, Williams JV, Wilson GJ, et al. Medical and economic impact of a respiratory syncytial virus outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24:1040-1044. 50. Kurz H, Herbich K, Janata O, et al. Experience with the use of palivizumab together with infection control measures to prevent respiratory syncytial virus outbreaks in neonatal intensive care units. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70:246-252. 51. Jones BL, Clark S, Curran ET, et al. Control of an outbreak of respiratory syncytial virus infection in immunocompromised adults. J Hosp Infect. 2000;44:53-57. 52. Sorvillo FJ, Huie SF, Strassburg MA, et al. An outbreak of respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia in a nursing home for the elderly. J Infect. 1984;9:252-256. 53. Huang F-L, Chen P-Y, Shi ZY, et al. An unusual respiratory syncytial virus nosocomial outbreak in an adult psychiatry ward. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2009;62:61-62. 54. Caram LB, Chen J, Taggart EW, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus outbreak in a long-term care facility detected using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction: an argument for realtime detection methods. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:482-485.