Electronic switching in GeBiSeTe glasses

Electronic switching in GeBiSeTe glasses

Materials Science and Engineering, BI2 (1992) 2 1 9 - 2 2 2 219 Electronic switching in Ge-Bi-Se-Te glasses Syed Rahman and G. Sivarama Sastry Physi...

289KB Sizes 28 Downloads 129 Views

Materials Science and Engineering, BI2 (1992) 2 1 9 - 2 2 2

219

Electronic switching in Ge-Bi-Se-Te glasses Syed Rahman and G. Sivarama Sastry Physics Department, Osmania University, Hyderabad (India) (Received December 19, 1990; in revised form August 14, 1991 )

Abstract Thin Ge2c~BixSe7o_~Te m (x = 7, 9, 1 1 and 13) films were studied for their switching properties. It is shown that the switching characteristics can be varied by controlling the film thickness and concentration of bismuth. It was observed that films with x >/9 exhibited electronic switching. The results were analysed on the basis of a chemically ordered network model (CONM), where the formation of a sufficient number of heteropolar bonds is favoured over the formation of homopolar bonds.

1. Introduction

It is generally observed that most atomic impurities have little influence on the electrical properties of amorphous semiconductors, including chalcogenides. This is usually explained by Mott's 8-N rule [1], according to which the covalent bonding requirements of the impurities are satisfied and hence they do not form donors or acceptors. Chalcogenide glasses exhibit many useful electrical properties, including threshold and memory switching [2-4]. These electrical properties are influenced by structural effects associated with thermal effects and can be related to thermally induced transitions [5, 6]. In chalcogenide glass systems, glasses exhibiting no exothermic crystallization reaction above the glass transition temperature Tg appear to be of the threshold switching type, and the glasses exhibiting an endothermic crystallization reaction above Tg show a memory type of switching [7, 8]. Memory switches come from the boundaries of glassforming regions where glasses are more prone to crystallization. Threshold switches are made near the centre of the glass-forming region where the glasses are stable and show no tendency to crystallize when heated or cooled slowly [9]. It is very well established that some chalcogenide glasses, when prepared in the form of thin films, exhibited switching properties [10, 11]; these properties can be strongly modified by making compositional changes in these materials and offer the advantage of being fabricated with relative ease. Many glasses based on the Si-Te and Ge-Te systems exhibit the switching phenomenon [12, 13]. In this paper we report switching properties observed in Ge-Bi-Se-Te thin films, in which the bismuth content was varied from 7 to 13 at.%.

2. Experimental details

Bulk glasses in Ge20BixSel00_xTem system (7 ~
S. Rahman and (;. Sivarama Sastrv

220

/'

tflectronic switching it? glasse~s -2

GezoBix SeTo-x/ejo



-5 T~

ENDO

- 1 4 0 0 A°

o-1600~ a-2100~ Ge20 Bi7 Se63TelO

Tc

-4

-5

E 0

I

I

200

I 280

I

~ 3

I

0

I

I

4&O

t

I

520

I

600 C:~ 0

Temperature (~C¿

-6

Fig. 1. Differential scanning calorimetry thermogram of Ge20BigS%jTelo bulk glass.

-7

-8

,~o

~'0

.'o

7b

&

~b

4'0

.'0

~'0

vst vBz %3

,0

--c 0

2 O, DEORE ES

I 0 '25

I 0" 5

I

~l

0'75

t

I

I '0

1'25

1"5

log V (volts)

Fig. 2. X-ray diffraction of GeBiSeTe thin film.

Fig. 4. Variation of log I with log V in Ge2.BiTSe~3Tejofilm. trace from measurement o f thickness

-2

• _,oo -3

bottom electrode top electrode substrate hin Layer

¢/"

o-,500 A°

:-2o50

A

/

~ r

/

1/

1

-6

Fig. 3. Sandwich arrangement of the specimens for measuring the switching characteristics.

--7

. ....-~

0

~ 0'2

I 04

I 06

Vrl V-r2 [

I 018

VT3 I IO

I

1"2

log V (volts)

Fig. 5. Variation of log I with log V in Ge~0Bi~jS%~Te.~film. for measuring the switching characteristics is shown in Fig. 3. The current flows through the film from top to bottom. The thickness of the film was measured by multiple-beam interferometry.

3. Experimental results The variation of current I in Ge20Bi7Se63Te10 films with the applied voltage V is shown in Fig. 4. At first log I varies linearly with log V and then becomes nonlinear. At a certain voltage VB depending on the film thickness the films break down irreversibly with the emission of light. Though the wavelength of the emitted light was not measured, it was observed visually. Figures 5 and 6 show the variation of l o g / of Ge20BigSe~tTel0 and Ge2oBi13Se57Te10 films. It is seen

that log I varies linearly with log V and the dependence fits a relation of the type I = A Va where A and a are constants. The films show switching characteristics at a certain voltage VT which is found to be dependent on the film thickness, as can be seen from Figs. 5 and 6. The value of a is approximately unity below VT, indicating that the behaviour is almost ohmic up to the threshold value and becomes greater than unity beyond VT.

4. Discussion The switching phenomenon has been explained on the basis of two types of theories: (i) thermally initiated

S. Rahman and G. Sivarama Sastry -2

-31

E o

._1300A o t,-22oo~

Ge2oBqaSes-tTe,o

..P

//~

-5

~g 6

-7

VTtVT2 VT3

-8

ol2

o!4

0!6

0.~8

I I I Io

II 1.2

14

log V (volts) Fig. 6. Variation of log I with log V in Gez.Bi13S%7Tel. film.

[14, 15] owing to thermal instability and (ii) electronically initiated [16, 17] owing to the breakdown of the electronic equilibrium as a result of applied field or current. Boer and Ovshinsky [15] have shown that the switching phenomenon is initiated by a thermal process followed by an electronic process. Buckley and Holmberg [18] have observed threshold switching in chalcogenide thin films in a sandwich structure and concluded that the switching phenomenon is a bulk effect. In the present study the films were subjected to continuous voltage loading. The films with 7 at.% Bi showed irreversible breakdown after a certain voltage. However, for the films with 9, 11 and 13 at.% Bi, the log I vs. log V plots were exactly retraceable under repeated cycles of voltage loading. The films which exhibited switching only showed destructive and irreversible breakdown when voltages well above the threshold value were applied. The breakdown voltage was nearer the threshold voltage as the film thickness decreased. The films with 9, 11 and 13 at.% Bi which showed switching also emitted light during breakdown, just as the films with 7 at.% Bi. At breakdown, the light was emitted along the plane of the film and the duration of the light pulse was very short. The film remained amorphous in nature with no filament formation during breakdown. From the above results, it is observed that the addition of bismuth above a certain concentration leads to the appearance of the switching phemomenon in GeBiSeTe films. The origin of switching may be either thermal or electronic. If thermal effects are causing the switching, then it is possible that bismuth may be facilitating the process of crystallization and hence the formation of a conducting channel. For thermal switching to occur, the material should have strongly temperature-dependent electrical conductivity. However, the results of electrical conductivity of GeBiSeTe thin films [19] indicate that an electronic mechanism is more probable. Adler and coworkers [20, 21] have proposed

/

Electronic switching in glasses

221

that the capacity of chalcogenides to switch without immediate crystallization can be understood in terms of the electronic band structure. According to these authors, the likely stability condition for switching is that the highest occupied band in chalcogenides should result from interaction between the non-binding electrons, i.e. the lone pair of chalcogen atoms. This allows intense electronic excitation without disrupting the band structure of the materials. The results of Vezzoli [22-24] also seem to favour an electronic mechanism for switching in chalcogenides. In Ge20Se8. glass, only Ge-Se and Se-Se bonds are assumed to be present. When bismuth is incorporated in GeSeTe glass, bismuth is expected to combine preferably with selenium because the bond energy of the Bi-Se bond (40.7 kcal m o l ] ) is larger than that of the Bi-Ge bond (31 kcal mol- l ), followed by the decrease in the concentration of the Se-Se bonds [25]. Tellurium combines with germanium rather than bismuth, considering that the bond energy is 37.5 kcal mol- ~for the Ge-Te bond and 29.9 kcal mol-~ for the Bi-Te bond. The concentration of Ge-Se bonds is almost constant over the whole composition range, whereas that of the Bi-Se bonds increases and that of Se-Se bonds decreases monotonously with increasing bismuth content up to 9 at.%, where Se-Se and Te-Te bonds vanish. Under this reasoning, the addition of bismuth (greater than or equal to 9 at.%) in the GeBiSeTe glass system produces a large number of heteropolar bonds which contribute to the observed switching in thin films with 9-13 at.% Bi. The pre-switching and post-switching plots are not suggestive of a thermally governed effect.

5. Conclusions The electronic switching phenomenon was observed with emission of radiation in Ge20Bi~SeT0_~Tel0 (x/> 9) glassy thin films. The results were discussed on the basis of a chemically ordered network model (CONM).

Acknowledgment One of the authors (SR) wishes to thank the CSIR, New Delhi, for providing financial assistance.

References 1 N. E Mott, Philos. Mag., 19(1969) 835. 2 S. R. Ovshinsky and H. Fritzsche, Metall. Trans., 2 (1971) 641. 3 R. G. Neale, D. L. Nelson and G. E. Moore, Electronics, 49 (1970) 56.

222

S. RaMmm urn/(;. Sivarama Sastrv

4 D. Adler, Electronics, 4t)(1970) 61. 5 J. R. Bosnell and G. B. Thomas, Solid State Electron., 15 (1972) 1261. 6 G. B. Thomas, A. E Frat and J. R. Bosnell, Philos. Mag., 26 (1972)617. 7 R. H. Quinn and R. T. Johnson, J. Non-(Tyst. Solids, 7 (1972)617. 8 M. Lasocka and H. Matyja, J. Non-(o,st. Solids, 14 (1974) 41. 9 J.R. Bosnell and J. A. Savage, J. Muter. Sei., 7(1972) 1235. 10 S. R. Ovshinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett., 21 (1968) 145(/. 11 Y. Ashara and T. Izumitani, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 15 (1972) 109. 12 J.A. Savage, J. Mater. Sci., 7(1972) 1235. 13 J.A. Savage, J. Mater. Sci., 6 ( 1971 ) 964. 14 H. Fritzsche and S. R. Ovshinsky, J. Non-C~st. Solids, 4 (197(1) 464.

/

l:/ectrot ic sn'ilcl~it g in glusse~

15 K. W. Boer and S. R. Ovshinsky, .I. AI)plr IJh):~., /1:1970 2675. 16 D.C. Mattice, Phy.s'. Rev. Left., 22(1969) 936. 17 N. 1=. Mort, ('ontemp. Ph):s'., 10(1969) 125. 18 W. 1). Buckley and S. H. tlolmberg, Phys. Rev. Lelt., 32 (1974) 1429. 19 Syed Rahman, G. Sivarama Sastry and S. G. Sathyanarayan, submitted to .I. Non-Cryst. Solids. 20 D. Adler, M. S. Shut, M. Silva and S. R. Ovshmsky, J. App/. Phys., 51 (1980) 3289. 21 D. Adler, H. K. Henisch and N. F. Mott, Rev. Mod. Phys., 50 (1978) 203. 22 G.C. Vezzoli, J. Appl. Phys., 50{ 1979) 5810. 23 G.C. Vezzoli, Appl. Phys. Lett., 35 (1979) 288. 24 G. C. Vezzoli, Phys. Rev. B, 23 ( 1981 ) 879. 25 N. Thoge, T. Minami, Y. Yamamoto and M Tanaka, J. Appl. Phys., 51 (1982) 1048.