Emissions of automobiles fueled with alternative fuels based on engine technology: A review

Emissions of automobiles fueled with alternative fuels based on engine technology: A review

Accepted Manuscript Emissions of automobiles fueled with alternative fuels based on engine technology: a review Yisong Chen, Jinqiu Ma, Bin Han, Peng ...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 26 Views

Accepted Manuscript Emissions of automobiles fueled with alternative fuels based on engine technology: a review Yisong Chen, Jinqiu Ma, Bin Han, Peng Zhang, Haining Hua, Hao Chen, Xin Su PII:

S2095-7564(18)30343-X

DOI:

10.1016/j.jtte.2018.05.001

Reference:

JTTE 185

To appear in:

Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition)

Received Date: 20 February 2018 Revised Date:

18 May 2018

Accepted Date: 21 May 2018

Please cite this article as: Chen, Y., Ma, J., Han, B., Zhang, P., Hua, H., Chen, H., Su, X., Emissions of automobiles fueled with alternative fuels based on engine technology: a review, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2018.05.001. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1

Reviews

2

Emissions of automobiles fueled with

4

alternative fuels based on engine

5

technology: a review

SC

6

Yisong Chen, Jinqiu Ma, Bin Han, Peng Zhang, Haining Hua, Hao Chen*, Xin Su

M AN U

7 8 9

School of Automobile, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China

10 Article history

12

Received 20 Feb 2018

13

Received in revised form 18 May 2018

14

Accepted 21 May 2018

15

Available online

AC C

Highlights

EP

16

TE D

11

17

RI PT

3

18

Emissions of automobiles fueled with main alternative fuels are reviewed.

19

Emissions of NG/gasoline bi-fuel, NG and NG/diesel dual fuel engines are analyzed.

20

Emissions of SI engines fueled with oxygenated fuels are analyzed.

21

Emissions of CI engines fueled with oxygenated fuels are analyzed.

22 23

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Abstract

25

Diversification of alternative fuels for automobiles is not only an actual situation, but also a

26

development trend. Whether the alternative fuels are clean is an important issue. Emissions of

27

automobiles fueled with natural gas (NG), methanol, ethanol, biodiesel, dimethyl ether (DME) and

28

polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (PODEn) are investigated and reviewed based on engine

29

technology and fuel properties. Compared to gasoline, NG/gasoline bi-fuel and NG automobiles have

30

higher brake thermal efficiencies (BTE) and produce less HC, CO and PM emissions, while more NOx

31

emission. Compared to diesel, NG/diesel dual fuel automobiles have lower BTE and emit lower soot

32

and NOx emissions, but higher HC and CO emissions. Methanol and ethanol blending in gasoline can

33

obviously reduce the HC, CO and PM emissions of spark ignition (SI) automobiles. Methanol or

34

ethanol blending in diesel may prolong the ignition delay, shorten the combustion duration and improve

35

the BTE, resulting in lower soot emissions. However, the HC, CO and NOx emissions of methanol or

36

ethanol diesel blend fuels are uncertain due to low cetane number, high latent heat of vaporization.

37

Most biodiesel has higher viscosity, distillation temperature, cetane number and oxygen content than

38

diesel. Soot emission of biodiesel is lower than that of diesel, while NOx emission is higher. Both DME

39

and PODEn do not contain C-C bonds and their blend with diesel can prohibit the formation of soot.

40

PODEn has high cetane number and low viscosity, resulting in better ignitability and spray quality

41

respectively. PODEn blending shortens both the ignition delay and the combustion duration, improves

42

the BTE, and increases the temperature in the diffusion combustion phase, leading to a higher NOx

43

emission.

44

Keywords:

45

Natural gas; Methanol; Ethanol; Biodiesel; DME; PODEn; emission.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

24

46 47

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 29 82334471.

48 49 50

E-mail addresses: [email protected] (Y. Chen), [email protected] (H. Chen).

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

51

1

52

Since opening-up policy was implemented, China has experienced dramatic development, with

53

averaged 9.8% annual growth rates of gross domestic product (GDP), in comparison with the world’s

54

average of 3.3% (Xu et al., 2017). Problems of the world environment like global warming and energy

55

resources will cause great constraint on the world economy and may affect profoundly the basic

56

condition of human survival. As an important vehicle, automobile play an important role in people’s

57

daily life and commercial activities. Besides, automobile industry is in an up road of the overall industry

58

system (He et al.,2017).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Introduction

Traditional automobile fuels derived from non-renewable fossil oil. Automobiles emit huge amounts

60

of pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHG), such as NOx, PM, CO HC and CO2, and exert great

61

influence on atmosphere environment and global warming. To protect the environment and ease the

62

climate change, the automobile technology worldwide tends to develop in the directions of energy

63

diversification and power electrification. Electrification of automobiles has been considered as the most

64

effective way and the ultimate solution. However, even if the technologies of power battery, electric

65

motor and electronic control continuously improve, two significant problems still exist. One is that the

66

power structure is inadequate and the other is the power constraint if electric automobiles are widely

67

applied. Diversification of clean alternative fuels for automobiles is regarded as the best choice and

68

path in the transitional period between petroleum fuels and electrification.

AC C

EP

TE D

59

69

In general, alternative fuels include fossil and renewable fuels. They can also be classified into

70

gaseous and liquid alternative fuels. Specifically, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), natural gas (NG),

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

71

alcohols mainly involving methanol and ethanol, ethers mainly including dimethyl ether (DME) and

72

polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (PODEn), and biodiesel are in localized or industrial application. Gaseous fuels such as compressed natural gas (CNG) are promising alternative fuels which receive

74

more attention all over the world. Natural gas is a very promising and highly attractive fuel because of

75

its domestic availability, widespread distribution infrastructure, low cost, and clean-burning qualities to

76

be used as a transportation fuel (Wei and Peng, 2016). In that case, CNG is considered to be a

77

“cleaner” fuel compared to other fossil fuels. Therefore, it is used as an alternative fuel in motor

78

vehicles to reduce emissions of air pollutants in transportation (Wang et al., 2016a). Besides, it is also

79

applied in gasoline engine as a bi-fuel, added to diesel fuel and mixed with hydrogen to make better

80

engine and emission performance. Generally, there are three application modes of natural gas, which

81

are NG (CNG/LNG/HCNG), diesel/CNG dual fuel and CNG/gasoline bi-fuel.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

73

Among alternative fuels for gasoline, methanol (CH3OH) fuel has been considered to be one of the

83

most favorable fuels for internal combustion (IC) engines due to the high octane number and the high

84

intramolecular oxygen content (Avinash et al., 2014; Li, et al., 2010a; Zhen et al., 2013). A large

85

number of domestic and foreign scholars have studied the application of methanol on internal

86

combustion engine: it can be used with different application modes (mixed or pure methanol) in a

87

spark-ignition (SI) engine (Agarwal et al., 2014; Gravalos et al., 2013; Lennox et al., 2014; Liu et al.,

88

2007; Zhen and Wang, 2015) or with dual-fuel mode in a compression-ignition (CI) diesel engine (Pan

89

et al., 2015; Park et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2008a; Wei et al., 2015). Ethanol and methanol have similar

90

physical and chemical properties, is considered to replace fossil fuels of environmentally friendly fuel,

AC C

EP

82

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

91

which can be blended with other fuels at different proportions to improve engine emissions (Battal et al.,

92

2017; Oh et al., 2010; Shi et al., 2015; Turner et al., 2011). The chemical formula of dimethyl ether (DME) fuel is CH3OCH3; it is the simplest ether compound.

94

Among alternative fuels, the application of DME for diesel engines has been discussed by many

95

investigators because it has no carbon-carbon bonds and excellent self-ignition characteristics

96

compared to other fuels. Meanwhile, the cetane number of DME fuel is significantly higher than that of

97

conventional diesel fuel (Park, 2012; Park and Lee, 2013; Roh et al., 2015; Semelsberger et al., 2006;

98

Youn et al., 2011). Due to its fuel characteristics, DME is particularly suitable to be used as a complete

99

substitute for diesel in compression ignition (CI) engines. It can be used as a blend with diesel to

100

overcome limitations of using pure DME, such as poor viscosity, low density and its after-effects. DME

101

could also be used as an additive or as an ignition promoter in conventional diesel combustion and for

102

dual fuel operation (Lee et al., 2011; Su et al., 2016; Thomas et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2013, 2014). In

103

recent years, it has been found that the mixture of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (PODEn) is a

104

promising engine fuel. Chemical expression of PODEn is CH3O(CH2O)nCH3. As an oligomer of ether,

105

PODEn has a higher cetane number and oxygen content and does not contain C-C bonds, which has

106

the potential to reduce diesel smoke and PM emissions (Lei et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2016b, 2017b;

107

Pellegrini et al., 2012), and it can be mixed with diesel in any proportion (Burger et al., 2010; Härtl et al.,

108

2015; Liu et al., 2016a; Pellegrini et al., 2013). In fact, n from 3 to 8 of PODEn has an excellent

109

performance for diesel additives (Stroefer et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2013). At room temperature, the

110

PODEn-diesel mixture has excellent stability (Härtl et al., 2015; Pellegrini et al., 2012; Zhao et al.,

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

93

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

2013). Generally, it can be used as a clean diesel blending components due to its diesel similar

112

physical properties and do not need transformation of vehicle engine oil supply system (Liu et al., 2017;

113

Xie et al., 2017b).

RI PT

111

Biodiesel, also called fatty acid methyl esters, is mainly made from vegetable oils or animal fats and

115

is an ideal alternative fuel for diesel engines. Compared to petroleum diesel, biodiesel has higher

116

cetane number, about 10% intramolecular oxygen, almost no aromatic hydrocarbon and sulfur. This

117

leads to different fuel injection and spray properties, combustion characteristic, and exhaust emissions

118

from petroleum diesel fuel (Hasan and Rahman, 2017; He et al., 2007; Lou and Tan, 2016; Miri et al.,

119

2016; Xu et al., 2012). But there are some disadvantages of biodiesel which restrain its wide

120

application and hinder its use as a complete replacement for diesel, which include higher kinematic

121

viscosity, freezing temperature and density, as well as its low calorific value. Viscosity of biodiesel not

122

only affects flow at all temperatures a fuel may be exposed to but also strongly influences the

123

atomization of a fuel upon injection into the combustion chamber and ultimately the possible formation

124

of engine deposits (Knothe and Gazon, 2017). That is why many scientists and investigators have

125

studied blends of biodiesel with diesel by varying the proportions of biodiesel and diesel to investigate

126

their suitability as a fuel in existing diesel engines. These problems associated with biodiesel can be

127

overcome by using biodiesel-diesel blends (Nair et al., 2016; Sun et al., 2010; Yasin et al., 2015; Yusaf

128

et al., 2011).

129

2

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

114

Emissions of NG automobiles based on engine technology

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

130

2.1

131

In general, NG vehicles have lower emissions compared to gasoline or diesel engines (Kakaee and

132

Paykani, 2013). Specifically, a decreasing trend is found for PAHs, SO2 and CO concentrations, while

133

the NOx level is increased in comparison to those before the implementation of CNG (Ravindra et al.,

134

2006). Due to the high octane number of NG, engines can be operated with a higher compression ratio

135

(CR) for a better thermal efficiency (Liu et al., 2012). CRs of NG engines are commonly designed in the

136

range of 11~13, which are higher than those of gasoline engines. CRs and application modes of NG

137

(CNG/LNG/HCNG) sole fuel, diesel/CNG dual fuel and CNG/gasoline bi-fuel engines are shown in Fig.

138

1.

139

140

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Pure NG (CNG/LNG)

Fig. 1 CRs and application modes for NG automobiles with different engine modes.

7

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

141

Fig. 2 Typical natural gas composition by volume (Kakaee et al., 2014)

SC

142

It has been reported that the engine performance and emission are greatly affected by varying

144

compositions of natural gas (Fig. 2). The most important NG fuel property is the Wobbe number (WN).

145

Generally, it was agreed by researchers that the fuels with higher hydrocarbons, higher WN, and

146

higher energy content exhibited better fuel economy and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. NOx

147

emissions were also increased for gases with higher levels of higher WN, while total hydrocarbons

148

(THCs) and CO showed some reductions (Kakaee et al., 2014). The results indicate that higher WN

149

improves the combustion and the efficiency as well.

TE D

M AN U

143

Lean burn is an effective way to decrease the NOx emissions, while it results in high cyclic variation.

151

Dilution is another method to achieve lean burn and low NOx emissions. Common dilution gases are N2,

152

CO2 and Ar. The results show that the thermal efficiency first increases and then decreases as the

153

dilution ratio (DR) of Ar increases and NOx emissions decrease significantly (Li et al., 2015). Ar dilution

154

is superior in maintaining higher thermal efficiencies than CO2 and N2 for NG engines (Li et al., 2015).

155

Lean burn as well as EGR successfully satisfied the legal emission regulation when the level of dilution

156

was increased to the dilution limit, although there was a slight reduction in efficiency (Lee et al., 2014).

AC C

EP

150

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

157

2.2

158

Natural gas/diesel dual fuel is an operation mode in which natural gas is introduced into the intake air

159

of the inlet manifold and then ignited by the direct injected diesel in the cylinder. This mode has both

160

economic and environmental benefits. Due to the high auto-ignition temperature, NG can hardly be

161

burned through compression on diesel engines. In dual fuel mode, diesel acts as the ignition source

162

and NG provides the main energy if needed for combustion. Generally, dual fuel engine exhibited

163

longer ignition delay than diesel; had lower thermal efficiency than diesel at low and partial loads and

164

higher at medium and high loads; emitted less NOx emissions than diesel engine, while more HC and

165

CO emissions (Abdelaal et al., 2013; Abdelghaffar, 2011; Cheenkachorn et al., 2013).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

NG/diesel dual fuel

The application of dual fuel mode significantly decreases the NOx, CO2 and PM emissions

167

(Cheenkachorn et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2013; Lounici et al., 2014; Meng et al., 2016), compared to

168

diesel engines. The trade-off relationship between NOx and PM emission is solved. However, the

169

hydrocarbon (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions may increase by several times in comparison

170

to normal diesel combustion (Liu et al., 2013). The brake thermal efficiency (BTE) of dual fuel mode is

171

lower at low and intermediate loads, while under high engine load conditions it is similar or a little

172

higher when compared with normal diesel mode (Lounici et al., 2014). Dual fuel mode showed a

173

simultaneous reduction of soot and NOx species over a large engine operating area (Lounici et al.,

174

2014; Meng et al., 2016). In sum, trade-off relationship between soot and NOx emissions of diesel

175

engines can be solved by using dual fuel mode, whereas the BTE of engine decreases and HC

AC C

EP

TE D

166

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

176

emission increases. Nithyanandan et al. (2016) found that the use of CNG affects the morphology and nanostructure of

178

PM, and hence the oxidation reactivity of the soot. In Singh’s study (Singh et al., 2016), CMD (count

179

mean diameter) graph showed that average size of particulate emitted CNG engines were much

180

smaller compared to mineral diesel particulate. The addition of compressed natural gas lowers CO2

181

emission and decreases opacity of exhaust gases in all load modes, the best positive impact has been

182

achieved with the highest CNG portions (Vygintas et al., 2017). Liu et al. (2015) found that the

183

developed dual fuel model is capable to predicate the flame propagation and emissions formation

184

process in the dual fuel engine. Flame quench region of the fuel-lean mixture within the squish volume

185

is the dominant source of CO emissions a low engine speed condition. However, bulk gas complete

186

oxidation is impeded by the failure to transition into strong high temperature combustion in the cylinder

187

center region, which accounts for the majority of CO emissions at high engine speed. NO formation

188

region follows the development of the high temperature field for both low and high engine speed, which

189

is generated by the combustion of the pilot diesel. Therefore, the injection strategy and quantity of the

190

pilot fuel significantly determine the final exhaust NOx emissions during dual fuel operation conditions.

191

On the whole, NG/diesel dual fuel automobiles simultaneously reduce CO2, NOx and PM emissions

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

177

192

compared to diesel ones, while increase the HC and CO emissions.

193

2.3

194

Laminar burning velocity of NG is lower than that of methane, which is 48 cm/s (Korb et al., 2016). The

HCNG

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

velocity of H2 is 290 cm/s and accordingly its addition in NG will surely accelerate the combustion

196

speed, shorten the combustion duration and hence improve the thermal efficiency. Higher efficiency is

197

generally correlated with higher NOx emission, lower HC and CO emissions, and lower brake specific

198

fuel consumption (BSFC). Compared to NG, HNG present higher peak combustion pressure and

199

combustion temperature, and more concentrated heat release as shown in Fig. 3 (Korb et al., 2016).

200

(a)

RI PT

195

M AN U

SC

(b)

TE D

201

Fig. 3 Comparison of combustion characteristics between NG and HNG (Korb et al., 2016). (a) In-cylinder pressure and mean

203

temperature. (b) Mass fraction burned and ROHR.

204

EP

202

Mathai et al. ( 2012) made a comparative evaluation of performance, emission, lubricant and deposit

206

characteristics of spark ignition engine fueled with CNG and 18% hydrogen-CNG and found that

207

HCNG fueled engine decreased BSFC, CO and HC emissions with the increase of NOx emission.

208

Another study showed the effects of 0, 5%, 10% and 15% blends of hydrogen by energy with CNG on

209

bi-fuel NA SI engine using SPFIS (Nitnaware et al., 2016). MBT spark timing shown improvement in

210

performance parameters with reduction in NOx emission. Carbon based emission reduced and NOx

AC C

205

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

emission increased with increase in hydrogen addition. The optimum maximum brake torque (MBT)

212

spark timing of 25°CA BTDC and injection pressure 2.6 bar is observed for 5% hydrogen addition at

213

2500 rpm. Zareei et al. (2012) indicated that thermal efficiency, combustion performance, NOx

214

emissions improved with the increase of hydrogen addition level. The HC and CO emissions first

215

decrease with the increasing hydrogen enrichment level, but when hydrogen energy fraction exceeds

216

12.44%, it begins to increase again at idle and stoichiometric conditions.

218

Fig. 4 Comparison of emissions for NG vehicles.

AC C

217

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

211

219

In sum, NG automobiles with different types of engines have different environmental effects,

220

summarized in Fig. 4. As a whole, improvement of BTE brings high NOx emission and low HC, CO and

221

PM emissions for SI engines. NG/diesel dual fuel engines are modified on diesel engines and the

222

condition is complicated. Both NOx and PM emissions of dual fuel engines are reduced compared to

223

diesel. The decrease of BTE of dual fuel engine causes high HC and CO emissions.

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

224

3

225

The most common alcohols used on automobiles are methanol and ethanol. Although methanol can be

226

produced from a wide variety of renewable sources and alternative fossil fuel based feedstocks, in

227

practice methanol is mainly produced from natural gas and in China from coal (Chen et al., 2014;

228

Sayah and Sayah, 2011; Vancoillie et al., 2013). Fuel ethanol can be produced from both edible

229

feedstocks such as corn, wheat and stale grain and non-edible crops such as cassava and sweet

230

sorghum.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Emissions of automobiles fueled with alcohols based on engine technology

Methanol is a colorless, polar and flammable liquid which has higher octane number and heat of

232

vaporization values as compared to gasoline (Zhen and Wang, 2015). It is known that ethanol and

233

methanol have higher laminar flame speed, higher octane number and higher intramolecular oxygen

234

contents than those of gasoline. Accordingly, the combustion duration will be surely shortened. Lennox

235

et al. (2014) and Agarwal et al. (2014) studied the effects of methanol/gasoline blends on engine

236

performance, combustion and emission characteristics, and compared with pure gasoline. The result

237

showed that methanol/gasoline blends can reduce the combustion duration and exhaust gas

238

temperature, increase the peak heat release rate (PHRR), and increase the BTE. Wu et al. (2016)

239

experimentally investigated the effects of pure methanol on the combustion performance under idle

240

condition based on a SI engine. The results showed that the SI engine fueled with methanol illustrated

241

better lean burn performance than the engine fueled with gasoline. Compared with the engine fueled

242

with gasoline, the indicated thermal efficiency (ITE) of engine fueled with methanol was increased; the

243

flame development and propagation periods were shortened. On the whole, the combustion duration is

AC C

EP

TE D

231

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

shortened and the heat release is concentrated when alcohols are blended in gasoline. As a result, the

245

combustion process is improved. Although the BTEs of alcohols/gasoline blends increase, engine

246

power and torque decrease with the increase fraction of alcohol, due to the low heating value (Liu et al.,

247

2007). Using methanol/gasoline blends on a spark-ignition engine can significantly reduce CO and HC

248

emissions (Agarwal et al., 2014; Gravalos et al., 2013; Lennox et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2007; Wang et al.,

249

2015). Battal et al. (2017), Turner et al. (2011) and Oh et al. (2010) investigated the effects of

250

ethanol/gasoline mixtures on the performance and emissions at a spark-ignition engine. It is shown

251

that the benefits of adding ethanol into gasoline are reduced combustion duration and increased

252

in-cylinder pressure and combustion efficiency. Experiments and theoretical calculations showed that

253

ethanol added fuels show reduction in CO, CO2 and NOx emissions without significant loss of power

254

compared to gasoline. But it was measured that the reduction of the temperature inside the cylinder

255

increases HC emission.

258

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

257

N2+ O ↔ NO + N

AC C

256

RI PT

244

(1)

N2 + O2 ↔ NO + O

(2)

N + OH ↔ NO + H

(3)

259

As for NOx emission, the condition is extremely complicated. In general, thermal NOx, prompt NOx,

260

and fuel NOx are the three formation processes. Thermal formation is representative when

261

temperatures are high and the relative air to fuel ratio is close to 1. The reactions that take part on this

262

mechanism were described firstly by Zeldovich (1946) and later extended by Bowman et al. (1975),

263

described from Eq. (1) to Eq. (3). Agarwal et al. (2014) indicated that gasohol produced lower mass

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

emissions of NO and smoke opacity. The result was attributed to the higher latent heat of vaporization

265

of methanol compared to gasoline. Particulate size-number concentration was lower for gasohol

266

blends in comparison to gasoline at all engine operating conditions. Wang et al. (2015) indicated that

267

evident decrease in NOx emission was noticed with M15 and M25 fueling, but in the case of M40, NOx

268

emissions were similar with gasoline. Mustafa et al. (2013) investigated the combustion and exhaust

269

emissions characteristics of a SI engine fueled with the ethanol/gasoline (E5, E10) and

270

methanol/gasoline (M5, M10) fuel blends. NOx emissions decreased for all wheel powers at the speed

271

of 80 km/h. It has been also observed that the usage of alcohol fuel instead of gasoline caused to

272

decrease the NOx, and to increase CO2 emission because of the improved and completed combustion

273

(Balki et al., 2014; Mustafa and Balki, 2014; Wu et al., 2016).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

264

The increase of methanol increases the formaldehyde emissions and methanol emission increases

275

with the increase of engine load under different speeds (Liu et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2015). Injection

276

and ignition parameters also have significant influence on the combustion and emission of engines

277

fueled with alcohol/gasoline blends. Advancing methanol injection timing decreased the HC and CO,

278

while increased the NOx emission (Qu et al., 2015). Retarding ignition timing decreased the HC and

279

NOx emissions and the effect of ignition timing changes on CO emission is small (Qu et al., 2015). The

280

HC, CO, and NOx emissions of rich mixture are higher than those of lean mixture. Increasing intake air

281

temperature decreased the HC and CO emissions. Retarding methanol injection timing, advancing

282

ignition timing, using lean mixture and reducing intake air temperature can decrease the formaldehyde

283

emission (Li et al., 2010b).

AC C

EP

TE D

274

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Alcohols can also be applied on diesel engines through two methods: dual fuel mode or

285

emulsification/micro-emulsification. For dual fuel mode, methanol is mainly used. Compared with

286

conventional diesel, the methanol/diesel dual fuel combustion mode significantly reduces NOx and PM

287

emissions (Pan et al., 2015; Park et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2008; Wei et al., 2015). Park et al. (2017).

288

When the amount of methanol is increased, cylinder pressure and temperature decreased. The

289

resulting decrease in the combustion efficiency lowered the NOx emission and BTE of the engine.

290

Wang et al. (2008a) found that the increase in methanol mass fraction lowers the polytropic index of

291

compression and the temperatures at BDC and TDC, as well as the oxygen concentration in the

292

mixture. This prolongs the ignition delay under the same engine load and speed condition by

293

comparison with diesel operation. The heat release rate changes from dual-peak mode to single-peak

294

mode. The high methanol mass fraction will realize a simultaneous reduction in both smoke and NOx

295

under all the operating conditions. Meanwhile, the NOx-smoke trade-off curve disappears in

296

combustion of the dual fuel, but CO and HC increase. Wei et al. (2015) investigated the combustion

297

and emission characteristics of a dual fuel diesel engine with high premixed ratio of methanol (PRM).

298

High PRM prolonged the ignition delay but shortened the combustion duration and decreased the

299

in-cylinder gas temperature. Both NOx and dry soot emissions were significantly reduced, while HC,

300

CO, formaldehyde emissions and NO2 in NOx increased significantly with the increase of PRM (Wei et

301

al., 2015). Pan et al. (2015) and Geng et al. (2014) found that there was a strong coupling between the

302

intake air temperature and the methanol fraction to performance and emissions of the engine. At dual

303

fuel operation mode, decreasing intake air temperature reduced the indicated thermal efficiency (ITE)

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

284

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

and exhaust gas temperature and the trend was more evidently as methanol energy fraction increased.

305

Decreasing of intake air temperature also prolonged the ignition delay, which caused a later

306

combustion phasing and smaller peak cylinder pressure. By the induction of methanol, NOx, NO and

307

smoke emissions decreased markedly, while NO2, CO, THC, formaldehyde and methanol emissions

308

increased. However, increasing the intake air temperature would inhibit the NO2, THC, CO,

309

formaldehyde and methanol emissions and increase NO, NOx and soot emissions. Overall,

310

methanol/diesel dual-fuel combustion performs better in terms of engine performance and emissions

311

reduction under rich mixture conditions (Amin et al., 2015). Chen et al. (2017b) and Li et al. (2016)

312

investigate the effects of diesel injection parameters on the rapid combustion and emissions of the

313

diesel-methanol dual-fuel engine. The experimental results show that the diesel injection parameters

314

affect rapid combustion fraction (α) greatly, which increases as the diesel injection pressure rises while

315

decreases as the diesel injection timing advanced or diesel injection quantity increases. Liu et al. (2015)

316

indicated that at low injection pressure, the IMEP of dual fuel mode is lower than that of pure diesel

317

combustion mode. COVIEMP of dual fuel mode firstly decreases and then increases with the increasing

318

of injection pressure. Their researches shows both of NOx and smoke emissions are reduced while CO

319

and HC emissions increased obviously in dual fuel mode (Liu et al., 2015). Smoke emission can be

320

further reduced by coupling the high diesel injection pressure and the advanced diesel injection timing.

321

However, NOx emission may be increased in this case (Park et al., 2017). The methanol

322

co-combustion ratio (CCR) is defined as the ratio of methanol energy to the total energy in the dual-fuel

323

mode. θin is the injection timing. Comparison between emissions of diesel/methanol dual fuel (DMDF)

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

304

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

324

engine and normal diesel is presented in Fig. 5(a) and Fig. 5(b).

325

(a)

326

SC

RI PT

(b)

Fig. 5 Comparison of emissions between diesel and DMDF (Li et al., 2016). (a) CO and HC emissions. (b) NOx and soot

328

emissions.

M AN U

327

Alcohols can hardly be mixed with diesel, because the alcohols are polar solvents and diesel is

330

non-polar fuel. Cosolvents and surfactants must be used to help the mixing of diesel and alcohols,

331

forming emulsified fuel or micro-emulsified fuel. Emulsified fuel is in the condition of milkiness and

332

opaque, and the mixing state is unstable. Micro-emulsified fuel is transparent and stable. Some studies

333

confirmed that diesel/biodiesel blend fuels can mixed with a low volume ratio alcohols, forming

334

micro-emulsified fuel. Further studies (Aydin et al., 2015, 2017; Shi et al., 2015) have found that

335

biodiesel/ethanol/diesel fuel blends can be directly used on a diesel engine for lower PM and THC

336

emissions. However, a major drawback is that ethanol is immiscible in diesel over a wide range of

337

temperatures and water content because of their difference in chemical structure and characteristic,

338

these can result in fuel instability (Prommes et al., 2007).

AC C

EP

TE D

329

339

Both methanol and ethanol can be applied on SI or CI engines. The ultimate aim is to improve the

340

oxygen content and thus the combustion efficiency. As a result, HC, CO and PM emissions are

341

reduced. Methanol/diesel dual fuel engine is an exceptional case, which is similar with NG/diesel dual

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

fuel. The BTE of methanol/diesel dual fuel engine declines compared to diesel, producing lower NOx

343

and soot emissions and higher HC and CO emissions.

344

4

345

Most researchers reported that use biodiesel in a conventional diesel engine brings about a

346

considerable reduction in CO, CO2 and PM (Hasan and Rahman, 2017; He et al., 2007; Lou and Tan,

347

2016; Miri et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2012). Feedstocks of biodiesel are very abundant and they can be

348

classified into three generations. The first generation refers to the edible crops such as soybean,

349

rapeseed and palm oil, the second includes oil plants such as jatropha curcas, pistacia chinensis and

350

sapium sebiferum, and the third is microalgae such as Scenedesmus obliquus. Production principle

351

can be summarized into a common formula, shown in Fig. 6. Abundant feedstocks result in significant

352

difference in chemical composition of biodiesel and thus its properties. Table 1 lists the composition

353

and properties of some typical biodiesel (Jain and Sharma, 2011; Serrano et al., 2013; Wang et al.,

354

2012). Biodiesel mainly contained the same five components: methyl palmitate (C17H34O2), methyl

355

stearate (C19H38O2, C18:0), methyl oleate (C19H36O2, C18:1), methyl linoleate (C19H34O2, C18:2) and

356

methyl linolenate (C19H32O2, C18:3) (Shi et al., 2018). The molecular structure of the above

357

components is exhibited in Fig. 7. Cetane number of methyl palmitate, methyl stearate, methyl oleate,

358

methyl linoleate and methyl linolenate are respectively 86, 101, 59, 38 and 23. It can be concluded that

359

the higher the mass fraction of saturated fatty acid methyl esters (S-FAMEs) in biodiesel is, the higher

360

the cetane number is and the better the oxidative stability is, while the worse the low temperature

RI PT

342

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

Emissions of automobiles fueled with biodiesel based on engine technology

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

fluidity is. To ensure the basic use on diesel engines, the low temperature fluidity of biodiesel must be

362

guaranteed and as a result the mass fraction of unsaturated FAMEs (U-FAMEs) is generally higher

363

than 70% by weight. Consequently, cetane number of biodiesel in common use is a little higher than

364

that of diesel, which contributes to a better ignitability. Fig. 8 presents the heat release and in-cylinder

365

temperature of a common rail diesel engine fueled with biodiesel and diesel. Biodiesel has higher

366

viscosity and distillation temperature, leading to a poor homogeneity of mixture gas and atomization

367

quality. Consequently, the HRR of biodiesel in the pre-mixed combustion phase is lower than that of

368

diesel, and so does the PHRR. With the proceeding of combustion, biodiesel produces more active

369

radicals and accelerates the speed of chemical reaction, resulting in higher HRR compared to diesel in

370

the diffusion combustion phase. As a result, the in-cylinder temperature of biodiesel is higher and thus

371

the NOx emission.

SC

M AN U

TE D EP

Fig. 6 Chemical reaction formula for biodiesel production

AC C

372 373

RI PT

361

20

Fig. 7 Chemical structure of five major components in biodiesel

M AN U

374 375

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Due to the high cetane number, SOC of biodiesel advances and the ignition delay shortens.

377

In-cylinder temperature of biodiesel is slightly higher than that of diesel (shown in phase Ⅰ from A to B,

378

Fig. 8). Lower LHV, higher viscosity and lower volatility commonly contribute to the slower combustion

379

and hence the lower PHRR and combustion temperature of biodiesel, compared to diesel (shown in

380

phase Ⅱ from B to C, Fig. 8). It can be concluded that the intensity of diffusion combustion for

381

biodiesel is obviously higher than that of diesel, leading to the higher PCT and combustion temperature

382

(shown in phase Ⅲ from C to D, Fig. 8). It is mainly because that the intramolecular oxygen increases

383

the OH intensity of biodiesel along the injector axial line and the active radicals surely accelerate the

384

combustion speed. Fast combustion promotes the complete combustion of biodiesel and the

385

combustion duration shortens. As a result, the in-cylinder temperature of biodiesel is lower than that of

386

diesel, as shown in the phase Ⅳ (Fig. 8).

AC C

EP

TE D

376

387 388 389 390

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

(a)

(b)

RI PT

391

393

SC

392

Fig. 8 Comparison of heat release and in-cylinder temperature between diesel and biodiesel. (a) Heat release. (b) Temperature.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

394

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

395

Table 1 Composition of biodiesel derived from three generation feedstocks. Vernicia

Idesia

Sapium

Scenedesmus

Xanthoceras

Armeniaca

(%)

fordii

polycarpa

sebiferum

obliquus

sorbifolia

sibirica

C14:0

/

/

/

/

/

0.03

C16:0

3.56

15.50

7.21

18.42

5.27

C16:1

/

6.65

/

2.31

/

C16:2

/

/

/

3.26

/

C18:0

2.62

1.39

2.28

3.43

1.92

C18:1

10.57

9.53

14.61

49.64

C18:2

14.64

64.81

31.72

11.30

C18:3

59.20

2.08

41.02

8.26

C20:0

/

/

/

/

C20:1

0.90

0.04

/

/

C20:3

/

/

/

Others

8.51

/

/

S-

6.18

16.89

9.49

93.61

83.11

90.51

Cetane number

37.0

45.0

CFPP

-11

-5

Oxidative

0.4

0.7

(Wang et al.,

(Wang et al.,

2012)

2012)

Ref.

Elaeis

chinensis

0.30

/

/

0.10

1.00

3.79

10.90

19.75

23.14

5.10

44.80

0.67

/

/

0.99

/

0.30

/

/

/

/

/

/

1.01

3.20

4.63

1.18

2.10

3.80

SC

curcas

M AN U

Rapeseed

guineensis

46.83

44.35

57.90

39.90

44.47

28.92

54.50

28.50

28.51

24.70

9.28

6.46

0.14

6.80

0.01

0.84

7.90

0.22

0.20

0.09

0.10

0.17

0.10

0.20

0.35

/

0.12

/

/

/

1

/

/

7.27

/

/

/

/

/

/

3.38

3.24

/

0.20

/

0.89

/

0.03

21.85

8.00

4.92

14.50

24.66

24.42

7.50

50.27

74.77

92.00

95.08

85.30

75.34

74.82

91.50

49.70

43.0

46.0

47.6

48.8

/

51.0

51.30

/

61.0

-11

-6

-8

-14

/

0

-3

/

12

0.8

1.2

1.7

2.7

2.9

3.3

4.2

4.6

7.7

(Wang et al.,

(Serrano et

(Jain and

TE D

24.00

AC C

stability

Pistacia

65.23

EP

U

Jatropha

31.17

FAMEs

FAMEs

Soybean

RI PT

Composition w

(Wang et al., (Serrano et al., (Wang et al., 2012)

2013)

2012)

2012)

(Wang et (Serrano et (Wang et al.,

al., 2013) Sharma, 2011) al., 2012)

al., 2013)

2012)

23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

There are many researches find that rapeseed biodiesel and its blends have higher cetane number,

397

increased oxygen content, higher density and viscosity, but inferior lower heating value, and

398

compressibility when compared to diesel fuel. Miri et al. (2016), Aldhaidhawi et al. (2017) and Ismet et

399

al. (2012) investigated the performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine

400

fueled with rapeseed biodiesel and its blends and compared with pure petroleum diesel fuel.

401

Researches results reveal that rapeseed biodiesel, either pure or blended with diesel, has lower heat

402

release rate, reduced ignition delay and lower thermal efficiency. Meanwhile, effective power and

403

torque decrease at all engine loads. Regarding gaseous emissions, rapeseed biodiesel increase NOx

404

emissions, other emissions such as those of CO and particulate matter PM are usually found to

405

significantly decrease with rapeseed biodiesel content.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

396

Qi el al. (2009; 2010) and Özener et al. (2014) investigated the effect of biodiesel produced from

407

soybean crude oil on the combustion characteristics, performance and exhaust emissions of a diesel

408

engine. The results showed that biodiesel exhibited the similar combustion stages to that of diesel,

409

however, biodiesel showed an earlier start of combustion. At lower engine loads, the peak cylinder

410

pressure, the peak rate of pressure rise and the peak of heat release rate during premixed combustion

411

phase were higher for biodiesel than for diesel. At higher engine loads, the peak cylinder pressure of

412

biodiesel was almost similar to that of diesel, but the peak rate of pressure rise and the peak of heat

413

release rate were lower for biodiesel. The power output of biodiesel was almost identical with that of

414

diesel. It is also observed that there is a significant reduction in CO and smoke emissions at high

415

engine loads, while NOx emissions increased. Moreover, biodiesel provided significant reduction in CO,

AC C

EP

TE D

406

24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

HC, NOx and smoke under speed characteristic at full engine load (Qi et al., 2009). Özer et al. (2016)

417

indicated that the maximum heat release rate and maximum in-cylinder pressure were mostly

418

increased with the combined effects of biodiesel fuel addition and EGR application. Improvements on

419

the THC emissions were obtained by the use of 20 vol.% soybean biodiesel fuel blend and increase of

420

EGR rate at the low and partial engine loads, while deterioration occurred at the high engine load when

421

the EGR was increased to over 5% rate.

SC

RI PT

416

Wei et al. (2017) investigated the influence of waste cooking oil (WCO) biodiesel on the combustion,

423

emissions characteristics of a diesel engine. The increase of in-cylinder pressure is mainly due to the

424

advanced start of combustion and more complete combustion when using biodiesel. Lower maximum

425

heat release rate is due to the less intense combustion in the premixed combustion phase. Earlier start

426

of combustion is mainly attributed to the higher bulk modulus and higher viscosity of biodiesel.

427

Biodiesel reduces the weighted particle mass concentration and the weighted geometric mean

428

diameter of the particles. Enweremadu and Rutto (2010) found that the engine performance of the

429

WCO biodiesel and its blends were only marginally poorer compared to diesel. From the standpoint of

430

emissions, NOx emissions were slightly higher while HC emissions were lower for WCO biodiesel when

431

compares to diesel fuel. Compared with other vegetable oils and petroleum diesel fuels, palm oil is

432

associated with better engine performance and shorter ignition delay. Use of palm oil also reduces

433

exhaust emission of HC, CO and smoke and exhaust gas temperatures, while significantly improve

434

levels of NOx (Leevijit et al., 2017; Mosarof et al., 2015; Ndayishimiye and Tazerout, 2011).

435

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

422

However, some researches showed that the addition of biodiesel reduces NOx emissions and

25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

increases in soot emissions (Nair et al., 2016; Yasin et al., 2015; Yusaf et al., 2011). Sun et al. (2010)

437

report that inconsistencies of NOx emission appear among studies due to different with engine type,

438

engine technology, and fuel feedstock.

439

5

RI PT

436

SC

Emissions of automobiles fueled with ethers based on engine technology

DME, CH3-O-CH3, has a higher cetane rating and oxygen content than diesel and has good

441

evaporation characteristics in the combustion chamber. Meanwhile, it has no direct C-C bonds which

442

produces considerably less pollutants like HC, smoke and particulate matter (PM) than conventional

443

fuels. This property makes it very attractive as a clean fuel for transportation and domestic utilization.

444

Therefore, it is an excellent, efficient alternative fuel for diesel engines. At present, most of

445

investigations focused on the pure DME combustion or effects of DME quality on CI engine fuel

446

economy and emissions (Hou et al, 2014; Su et al., 2014; Su and Chang, 2014; Park and Lee, 2013;

447

Youn et al., 2011). DME has good solubility with diesel (Wang et al., 2008b) (Fig. 9(a)). It is also found

448

that compared with diesel, BSECs of blend fuels firstly decrease and then increase, as shown in Fig.

449

9(b). Consequently, the sequence of BTE is diesel < DME10 < DME15 > DME20. This condition is

450

similar with PODEn. Adequate addition of DME can surely promote the complete combustion and

451

increase the BTE. Both NOx and soot emissions of DME/diesel blend fuels are lower than those of

452

diesel (Fig. 10).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

440

453

Youn et al. (2011) investigated the combustions and emissions characteristics of DME compared to

454

conventional diesel fuels. In combustion characteristics, the peak combustion pressure and the ignition

26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

delay of DME fuel is higher and faster than those of ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD), respectively. The

456

NOx emission of DME fuel shows slightly higher than that of diesel at the same engine load condition,

457

while HC and CO emissions were lower. Also, the soot emission of DME fuel is nearly zero level (Su

458

and Chang, 2014; Park and Lee, 2013). Hou et al. (2014) investigated combustion and emissions

459

characteristics of a turbocharged compression ignition engine fueled with DME and biodiesel blends.

460

The result shows that with the increase of DME proportion, ignition delay, the peak in-cylinder pressure,

461

peak heat-release rate, peak in-cylinder temperature decrease, and their phases retard. Compared to

462

biodiesel, NOx emissions of blends significantly decrease; HC emissions and CO emissions increase

463

slightly (Su et al., 2014). Zhao et al. (2014) investigated the effects of DME (dimethyl ether) premixing

464

ratio and cooled external EGR (exhaust gas recirculation) rate on combustion, performance and

465

emission characteristics of a DME-diesel dual fuel premixed charge compression ignition (PCCI)

466

engine. The result showed that HCCI combustion of the premixed gas promoted the in-cylinder

467

pressure and temperature, resulting in an earlier SOC and a shortened diesel ignition delay. The

468

decrease in the diesel fuel during the diffusion combustion improved the mixing uniformity between the

469

fuel and air. Thus, the combustion became more complete and the brake thermal efficiency improved.

470

A higher DME premixing ratio caused lower smoke and NOx emissions but higher HC and CO

471

emissions. PCCI engine with EGR exhibited an obvious postponed SOC and prolonged combustion

472

duration. Thus, the maximum values of in-cylinder pressure, mean charge temperature, heat release

473

rate and pressure rise rate all decreased. As the EGR rate increased, NOx emission decreased, but

474

smoke, CO and HC emission increased. Wang et al. (2013, 2014) found that both port DME quantity

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

455

27

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

and injection timing remarkably influenced the combustion process and exhaust emission of engine.

476

They had little impact on the peak position of HRR during low temperature reaction (LTR) phase.

477

However, the peak value of HRR increased and the crank-angle corresponding to the HRR peak

478

advanced with an incremental DME quantity or an early injection during high-temperature reaction

479

(HTR) phase. The peak value of HRR dropped with an incremental DME quantity or a late injection

480

during the diffusion combustion phase. Peak values of in-cylinder pressure and temperature increased

481

with an incremental DME quantity or an early injection. For the fixed injection timing, NOx emissions

482

presented a decreasing trend with a rise of DME quantity but this decreasing trend ceased at a higher

483

DME quantity. Smoke emission reduced, but CO and HC emissions increased with a rise of DME

484

quantity. Su et al. (2016) also found that the ethanol fraction have a more obvious effect on the

485

indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) for advanced in-cylinder injection timings than around the

486

top dead center (TDC) conditions. The application of the DME-ethanol dual-fuel combustion strategy

487

caused a significant reduction of indicated specific NOx without deterioration of indicated specific soot.

488

In addition, a high ethanol fraction led to a low NOx for the same premixed combustion duration, while

489

HC and CO emissions increased slightly.

490

(a)

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

475

(b)

491 492

Fig. 9 Comparison of mutual solubility and BSEC between DME and diesel (Wang et al., 2008b). (a) Mutual solubility. (b) BSEC.

28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

(a)

(b)

RI PT

493

494

Fig. 10 Comparison of NOx and soot emissions between DME and diesel (Wang et al., 2008b). (a) NOx emission. (b) Soot

496

emission.

M AN U

SC

495

Although DME is usually thought to be an alternative fuel for CI engines, the SI DME engine could be

498

started successfully and realize the stabile running. Shi et al. (2018) investigated the combustion and

499

emissions characteristics of a SI engine fueled with gasoline-DME blends. Test results showed that the

500

addition of dimethyl ether resulted in the raised indicated mean effective pressure for the gasoline

501

engine. Over increased and decreased spark timing tended to cause the dropped indicated mean

502

effective pressure. The coefficient of variation in indicated mean effective pressure was diminished

503

with the spark timing advances and dimethyl ether addition. NOx and HC emissions were dropped with

504

the spark timing decrease. NOx emissions from the dimethyl ether-mixed gasoline engine are

505

decreased with the decrease of spark angle. Ji et al. (2011) indicated that thermal efficiency, NOx and

506

HC emissions are improved with the increase of DME addition level. The combustion performance was

507

improved when DME addition fraction was less than 10%. CO emission first decreased and then

508

increased with the increase of DME enrichment level at stoichiometric condition.

509

AC C

EP

TE D

497

PODEn, with the structure CH3-O-(CH2O)n-CH3 and with no C-C bond, are promising blend fuels for

29

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

diesel due to low viscosities and pour points, high oxygen contents and high CNs. The “n” of CH2O

511

group is from 1 to 8, and the main composition is from 2 to 6. Properties of PODEn components are

512

listed in Table 2. PODEn can also be soluble with diesel at any proportion. Added into the diesel

513

blending with 10% to 20%, PODEn can significantly reduce the diesel cold filter point, can improve the

514

diesel combustion in the engine quality, and improve thermal efficiency (Shi et al., 2012). Feng et al.

515

(2013) found that the ignition delay of PODE3-8-diesel mixed fuel is shortened, the fuel consumption is

516

increased, but the effective thermal efficiency is improved, compared with diesel fuel.

517

M AN U

SC

RI PT

510

Table 2 Properties of PODEn components (Chen et al., 2017a). Density (g/cm3)

Component

0.96

PODE3: CH3O(CH2O)3CH3

1.02

PODE4: CH3O(CH2O)4CH3 PODE5: CH3O(CH2O)5CH3

Oxygen content (%)

63

45.3

156

78

47.1

1.06

202

90

48.2

1.10

242

100

49.0

1.13

280

104

49.6

EP

PODE6: CH3O(CH2O)6CH3

Cetane number

105

TE D

PODE2: CH3O(CH2O)2CH3

Boiling point (℃)

Yang et al. (2015), investigated the performances of engine fueled with PODE2-4 blend fuel. The

519

result showed that with the increase of the mixing ratio of PODE2-4, the diesel engine power and torque

520

drop, but thermal efficiency increase. Xie et al. (2017) made a study about PODEn and its high

521

proportion of diesel blended fuel on the combustion and emission of the engine. It was found that the

522

engine was pulsed with pure PODEn, and its effective thermal efficiency was improved and discharged

523

relative to diesel oil. So PODEn can be used as an alternative fuel for diesel alone (Burger, 2010; Feng,

524

2013). The NOx-soot trade off relationship can be dramatically improved (Burger et al., 2010). The NOx

AC C

518

30

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

and soot emissions can meet Euro Ⅴ standards at high load and Euro Ⅵ standards at medium load.

526

Oxygenated fuel is an important method to inhibit the formation of soot emissions and improving air

527

entrainment by blending high volatility fuel is another approach. PODEn has lower distillation

528

temperature than diesel and thereby higher volatility (Liu et al., 2016a, 2017b). Furthermore, PODEn

529

has lower viscosity than diesel. As a result, blending PODEn in diesel is helpful to improve the forming

530

quality of air-fuel mixture and the spray quality.

SC

RI PT

525

Furthermore, Liu et al. (2017b) found the combustion efficiency can be dramatically improved which

532

leads to lower HC and CO emissions. In order to reduce emissions and improve thermal efficiency of

533

diesel engines, blends of GDP (gasoline/diesel/PODEn) were proposed and studied. GDP blends have

534

shorter ignition delay, lower max pressure rise rate and COVIMEP (coefficient of variation of indicated

535

mean effective pressure) than GD blends. GDP blends also have higher combustion efficiency and

536

thermal efficiency than GD blends, even slightly higher than diesel fuel. Pellegrini et al. (2013) studied

537

PODE3-5 on a diesel engine and the results showed that the use of 12.5% PODE3-5 mixture reduced

538

PM emissions; high mixing ratio PODE3-5/diesel could simultaneously optimize NOx, PM and noise, but

539

may cause problems with the engine hardware. Chen et al. (2017a) found that both soot and ultrafine

540

particles (UFP) emissions obviously decreased with the increase of PODEn ratio. At low engine loads,

541

the reduction effect for UFP is especially significant, as shown in Fig. 11.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

531

542 543 544 545

31

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

(a)

(b)

RI PT

546

547

Fig. 11 Comparison of UFPs between diesel and its blends with PODEn (Chen et al., 2017a).

549

(a) Number concentration. (b) Volume concentration.

SC

548

BTEs of PODEn/diesel blend fuels firstly increase compared to diesel with the blending ratio of

551

PODEn and then decrease, which is similar with DME. This condition is attributed to the lower LHV of

552

PODEn. The above reviews concluded that with the blending of PODEn, HC, CO and smoke emissions

553

decrease, while NOx emission increases. Compared to P20, BTE of P30 decreases and thus reduce

554

the NOx emission. High oxygen content still has obvious effect in reducing smoke emission.

TE D

EP

556

Fig. 12 Schematic diagram of soot formation process (Dale and Kenth, 2007).

AC C

555

M AN U

550

557

Fig. 12 indicates the soot formation process of diesel engine (Dale and Kenth, 2007). Alkynes are

558

polymerized into aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) through fuel pyrolysis. The growth of PAHs leads to

559

the formation of soot (core formation). On the whole, blending oxygenated fuel in diesel may provide

560

oxygen in the fuel-rich area of the diesel jet, which can inhibit the soot formation. Common ethers used

561

as diesel additive were DME with the molecular formula of CH3OCH3 and PODEn of CH3O(CH2O)nCH3.

562

There are no C-C bonds in both DME and PODEn and these ethers have the best effects in soot 32

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

reduction. Zhu et al. confirmed that the R-(C=O)O-R ′ group in biodiesel was less efficient in

564

suppressing the soot precursor’s formation than the R-OH group in n-pentanol (Zhu et al., 2016).

565

Further, it was confirmed that soot precursor generated in the biodiesel pyrolysis was proportional to

566

the concentration of unsaturated fatty acid methyl ester (the number of C=C double bonds) (Wang et

567

al., 2016b).

568

6.

569

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions derived from vehicles are the significant contributors to the global

570

warming and the climate change as shown in Fig.13. Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is

571

commonly used to evaluate the well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of alternative fuels.

SC

RI PT

563

573

AC C

572

EP

TE D

M AN U

Greenhouse gas emissions of alternative fuels based on life cycle assessment

Fig. 13 The transport sector as a major contributor to global energy-related CO2 emissions (Ashnani et al. 2015).

574

Ou and Zhang (2013) found that CHG-powered and LNG-powered vehicles emit 10%-20% and

575

5%-10% less GHGs than gasoline- and diesel-fueled vehicles respectively, which has the similar

576

results with Rose et al. (2013) that a 24% reduction of GHG emissions (CO2-equivalent) realized by

577

switching from diesel to CNG. Since NG has a lower carbon content than petroleum, gas to liquid

578

(GTL)-powered vehicles emit approximately 30% more GHGs than conventional fuel vehicles. The

33

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

579

carbon emission intensity of the LNG energy chain is highly sensitive to the efficiency of NG

580

liquefaction and the form of energy used in that process (Ou and Zhang, 2013). It was confirmed that biodiesel appears attractive since its use results in significant reductions of

582

GHG emissions in comparison to gasoline and diesel (Nanaki and Koroneos, 2012). Nocker and Torfs

583

(1998) made a comparison of LCA and external-cost analysis for biodiesel and diesel, which found that

584

both approaches confirm that although biodiesel offers advantages in terms of greenhouse gas

585

emissions, and it has similar or higher impacts on public health and the environment. However, from a

586

LCA perspective, it is not an accurate way for only focusing on the use phase of the fuels. Carneiro et

587

al. (2017) found that some biodiesel production pathways perform satisfactorily in terms of GHG

588

emissions compared to other biofuels, but some others can be even worst than fossil diesel, but

589

energy and GWP performances still can be improved if production pathways are carefully chosen and

590

optimized. Further, Collet et al., (2014) found that a large fraction of environmental impacts and

591

especially GHG emissions stem from the production of the electricity required for producing, harvesting

592

and transforming algae, in that case the source of electricity as well as algae production technology

593

may also play an important role in GHG reduction.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

581

594

As for ethanol, Blottnitz and Curran (2007) reported that bio-ethanol results in reductions in resource

595

use and global warming. A life cycle environmental impacts of selected U.S. ethanol production and

596

use pathways in 2022 was conducted and indicates that one kilometer traveled on E85 from the

597

feedstock-to-ethanol pathways evaluated has 43%-57% lower GHG emissions than a car operated on

598

conventional U.S. gasoline (base year 2005) (Hsu, et al. 2010). Even though bio-ethanol production

34

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

from sugarcane is considered to be a beneficial and cost-effective greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation

600

strategy, it is still a matter of controversy due to insufficient information on the total GHG balance of this

601

system (Lisboa et al. 2011). In sum, the utilization of alternative fuels including CNG, biodiesel, and

602

ethanol is helpfuel to control the GHG emissions.

603

7.

604

Diversification of fuels for automobiles is an inevitable strategy and trend of social and economic

605

sustainable development. Environmental pollution effects of automobiles fueled with alternative fuels

606

are extremely complicated, determined by fuel properties, engine technology and application modes.

607

In sum, improvement of BTE generally accompanies with the increase of NOx emission. High oxygen

608

content will surely prohibit the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and soot.

TE D

M AN U

SC

Conclusions and suggestions

RI PT

599

(1) Natural gas is the most important and successful alternative fuel for automobiles. NG/gasoline

610

bi-fuel automobiles have higher BTE than gasoline ones, producing less HC, CO, and PM emissions,

611

while more NOx emission. Pure NG automobiles have similar regulations with bi-fuel mode compared

612

to gasoline automobiles. NG/diesel dual fuel automobiles are commonly compared with diesel ones,

613

emitting higher HC and CO emissions and lower NOx and PM emissions with BTE decreasing. HCNG

614

improves the BTE of NG engine and as a result the NOx emission increases significantly.

AC C

EP

609

615

(2) Methanol and ethanol are generally applied on SI automobiles, through mixing with gasoline in

616

certain volume proportion together with the additive. High intramolecular oxygen contents accelerate

617

the combustion speed, shorten the combustion duration and thus improve the BTE, promoting the

35

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

complete combustion. Accordingly, HC and CO decrease obviously. Methanol and ethanol can also be

619

used on diesel engines, although their ignitability is poor due to the low cetane number. However, high

620

oxygen contents are helpful for inhibiting the formation of PM and their effects on the combustion

621

process are similar. The solubility of alcohols in diesel is very poor and many additives including

622

cosolvents and surfactants must be used, leading to the poor application.

SC

RI PT

618

(3) Biodiesel is an ideal and renewable alternative fuel for diesel and its physical and chemical

624

properties are close to those of diesel. The most important advantage is that biodiesel can be mixed

625

with diesel in any volume ratio. Although the feedstocks for the production are extremely abundant,

626

most biodiesel has five major compositions and as a result its intramolecular oxygen content is 10% or

627

so by weight, accounting for more than 70% by weight. To balance the trade-off relationship between

628

properties including oxidation stability (induction period) and ignitability (cetane number) and low

629

temperature fluidity (freezing point), the mass fraction of U-FAMEs is controlled no less than 70%. High

630

viscosity and low volatility of biodiesel result in poor homogeneity of mixture gas and spray quality.

631

Biodiesel has lower BTE than diesel at low loads, and higher at medium and high loads. Biodiesel

632

produces higher NOx emission than diesel, while less HC, CO, and PM emissions.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

623

633

(4) DME and PODEn do not contain C-C bonds and have high oxygen contents. They are considered

634

as the most promising blend fuel in diesel. Both of them have higher BTE than diesel, due to the more

635

concentrated heat release and more completed combustion. DME blending in diesel can reduce both

636

NOx and soot emissions. PODEn blending can also decrease the soot or PM emission of diesel engine

637

significantly, while increase the NOx emission in general. In general, increasing the blending ratio of

36

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

DME and PODEn reduce the soot or PM emissions, mainly due to the increasing of intramolecular

639

oxygen content. However, BTE does not increase throughout with the blending ratio and HC and CO

640

will increase when BTE decreases.

RI PT

638

(5) In most cases, high BTE means high NOx emission and low soot (or PM) emission for diesel

642

automobiles, exhibiting a trade-off relationship between NOx and soot (or PM). Automobiles equipped

643

with dual fuel engines, including both NG/diesel and methanol/diesel dual fuel, simultaneously reduce

644

the NOx and PM (or soot) emissions compared to diesel. The decline of BTE leads to the higher HC

645

and CO emissions.

646

Conflict of interest

647

The authors do not have any conflict of interest with other entities or researchers.

648

Acknowledgments

649

This study was supported by National Engineering Laboratory for Mobile Source Emission Control

650

Technology (NELMS2017B02), and the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges,

651

Chang’an University (310822172203).

652

References

653

Abdelaal, M.M., Rabee, B.A., Hegab, A.H., 2013. Effect of adding oxygen to the intake air on a dual-fuel

655 656

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

654

SC

641

engine performance, emissions, and knock tendency. Energy 61, 612-620. Abdelghaffar, W.A., 2011. Performance and emissions of a Diesel engine converted to dual diesel-CNG fueling. European Journal of Scientific Research 56(22), 279-293.

657

Agarwal, A.K., Karare, H., Dhar, A., 2014. Combustion, performance, emissions and particulate

658

characterization of a methanol-gasoline blend (gasohol) fuelled medium duty spark ignition

37

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

659

transportation engine. Fuel Processing Technology 121, 16-24. Amin, Y., Madjid, B., Benjamin, L., et al., 2015. Performance and emissions of a dual-fuel pilot diesel ignition

661

engine operating on various premixed fuels. Energy Conversion and Management 106, 322-336.

662

Aldhaidhawi, M., Chiriac, R., Badescu, V., 2017. Ignition delay, combustion and emission characteristics of

663

diesel engine fueled with rapeseed biodiesel - a literature review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy

664

Reviews 73, 178-186.

666

Ashnani, M.H.M., Miremadi, T., Johari, A., et al., 2015. Environmental impact of alternative fuels and vehicle

SC

665

RI PT

660

technologies: a life cycle assessment perspective. Procedia Environmental Sciences 30, 205-210. Aydin, F., Ogüt, H., Kalogirou, S.A., et al., 2017. Effects of using ethanol-biodiesel-diesel fuel in single

668

cylinder diesel engine to engine performance and emissions. Renewable Energy 103, 688-694.

669

Aydin, H., Ilkilic, C., et al., 2015. Effect of ethanol blending with biodiesel on engine performance and exhaust

671 672

emissions in a CI engine. Applied Thermal Engineering 30, 1199-1204. Balki, M.K., Sayin, C., Canakci, M., 2014. The effect of different alcohol fuels on the performance, emission

TE D

670

M AN U

667

and combustion characteristics of a gasoline engine. Fuel 115, 901-906. Battal, D., Dervis, E., Hayri, Y., et al., 2017. The effect of ethanol-gasoline blends on performance and

674

exhaust emissions of a spark ignition engine through exergy analysis. Applied Thermal Engineering

675

120, 433-443.

EP

673

Blottnitz, H.V., Curran, M.A., 2007. A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation

677

fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner

678

Production 15(7), 607-619.

679 680 681 682 683

AC C

676

Bowman, C.T., 1975. A shock-tube investigation of the high-temperature oxidation of methanol. Combustion and Flame 25, 343-354. Burger, J., Siegert, M., Ströfer, E., et al., 2010. Poly (oxymethylene) dimethyl ethers as components of tailored diesel fuel: properties, synthesis and purify: cation concepts. Fuel 89(11), 3315-3319. Carneiro, M.L.N.M., Pradelle, F., Braga, S.L., et al., 2017. Potential of biofuels from algae: comparison with

38

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

684

fossil fuels, ethanol and biodiesel in europe and brazil through life cycle assessment (LCA).

685

Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 73, 632-653.

691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703

RI PT

Chen, H., Lu, Y.L., Zhang, P.H., et al., 2014. The controversial fuel methanol strategy in China and its evaluation. Energy Strategy Reviews 4, 28-33.

SC

690

rail diesel engine fueled with diesel/biodiesel/PODE blends. Energy & Fuels 31(11), 11710-11722 .

Chen, Z.F., Yao, C.D., Yao, A.R., et al., 2017b. The impact of methanol injecting position on

M AN U

689

Chen, H., He, J.J., Hua, H.N., 2017a. Investigation on combustion and emission performance of a common

cylinder-to-cylinder variation in a diesel methanol dual fuel engine. Fuel 191, 150-163. Collet, P., Lardon, L., Hélias, A., et al., 2014. Biodiesel from microalgae - life cycle assessment and recommendations for potential improvements. Renewable Energy 71(3), 525-533. Dale, R.T., Kenth, I.S., 2007. Soot processes in compression ignition engines. Progress in Energy and

TE D

688

engine fuelled with diesel and LNG (liquid natural gas). Energy 53, 52-57.

Combustion Science 33(3), 272-309.

Enweremadu, C.C., Rutto, H.L., 2010. Combustion, emission and engine performance characteristics of used cooking oil biodiesel - a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 14(9), 2863-2873.

EP

687

Cheenkachorn, K., Poompipatpong, C., Ho, C.G., 2013. Performance and emissions of a heavy-duty diesel

Feng, H.J., Sun, P., Liu, J.H., et al., 2013. Polymethoxy Two Methyl Ether Diesel Blend Fuel on Diesel Engine Combustion and Emissions. Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang.

AC C

686

Geng, P., Yao, C.D., Wei, L.J., et al., 2014. Reduction of PM emissions from a heavy-duty diesel engine with diesel/methanol dual fuel. Fuel 123, 1-11.

704

Gravalos, I., Moshou, D., Gialamas, T., et al., 2013. Emissions characteristics of spark ignition engine

705

operating on lowerehigher molecular mass alcohol blended gasoline fuels. Renewable Energy 50,

706

27-32.

707

Hasan, M.M., Rahman, M.M., 2017. Performance and emission characteristics of biodiesel–diesel blend and

708

environmental and economic impacts of biodiesel production: a review. Renewable & Sustainable

39

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

710 711 712

Energy Reviews 74, 938-948. Härtl, M., Seidenspinner, P., Jacob, E., et al., 2015. Oxygenate screening on a heavy-duty diesel engine and emission characteristics of highly oxygenated oxymethylene ether fuel OME1. Fuel 153, 328-335.

RI PT

709

He, M., Zhou, J., Liu, L., 2017. A study of supporting legal policies for improving China’s new energy

713

automobile

714

environmental subsidies of Germany legal system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42,

715

18699-18708.

on

environmental

benefits

equilibrium-enlightenment

from

the

SC

717

based

He, C., Ge, Y.S., Han, X.K., et al., 2007. Combustion characteristics of direct injection diesel engine fueled with biodiesel. Chinese Internal Combustion Engine Engineering 28(6), 7-10.

M AN U

716

industry

718

Hou, J., Wen, Z., Jiang, Z., et al., 2014. Study on combustion and emissions of a turbocharged compression

719

ignition engine fueled with dimethyl ether and biodiesel blends. Journal of the Energy Institute 87(2),

720

102-113.

Hsu, D.D., Inman, D., Heath, G.A., et al., 2010. Life cycle environmental impacts of selected U.S. ethanol

722

production and use pathways in 2022. Environmental Science & Technology 44(13), 5289-5297.

723

Ismet, celikten., Mutlu, E., Solmaz, H., 2012. Variation of performance and emission characteristics of a

724

diesel engine fueled with diesel, rapeseed oil and hazelnut oil methyl ester blends. Renewable Energy

725

48(6), 122-126.

727 728 729 730 731

EP

Jain, S., Sharma, M.P., 2011. Oxidation stability of blends of Jatropha biodiesel with diesel. Fuel 90(10),

AC C

726

TE D

721

3014-3020.

Ji, C., Liang, C., Wang, S., 2011. Investigation on combustion and emissions of DME/gasoline mixtures in a spark-ignition engine. Fuel 90(3), 1133-1138. Kakaee, A.H., Paykani, A., 2013. Research and development of natural-gas fueled engines in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 26, 805-821.

732

Kakaee, A.H., Paykani, A. Ghajar, M., 2014. The influence of fuel composition on the combustion and

733

emission characteristics of natural gas fueled engines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

40

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

734

38, 64-78. Knothe, G., Razon, L.F., 2017. Biodiesel fuels. Progress in Energy & Combustion Science 58, 36-59.

736

Korb, B., Kawauchi, S., Wachtmeister, G., 2016. Influence of hydrogen addition on the operating range,

738 739 740 741

emissions and efficiency in lean burn natural gas engines at high specific loads. Fuel 164, 410-418. Lee, S., Oh, S., Choi, Y., et al., 2011. Performance and emission characteristics of a CI engine operated with n-Butane blended DME fuel. Applied Thermal Engineering 31(11-12), 1929-1935.

Lee, S., Park, S. Kim, C., et al., 2014. Comparative study on EGR and lean burn strategies employed in an

SC

737

RI PT

735

SI engine fueled by low calorific gas. Applied Energy 129, 10-16.

Leevijit, T., Prateepchaikul, G., Maliwan, K., et al, 2017. Comparative properties and utilization of

743

un-preheated degummed/esterified mixed crude palm oil-diesel blends in an agricultural engine.

744

Renewable Energy 101, 82-89.

M AN U

742

Lennox, S., Lukács, K., Akos, B., et al., 2014. Performance, combustion and emission characteristics of

746

n-butanol additive in methanol–gasoline blend fired in a naturally-aspirated spark ignition engine. Fuel

747

Processing Technology 118, 318-326.

750 751 752 753

reactions of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers. Acta Chimica Sinica 67(8), 767-772.

EP

749

Lei, Y., Sun, Q., Chen, Z., et al., 2009. Theoretical calculations on the thermodynamics for the synthesis

Li, J., Gong, C.M., Su, Y., et al., 2010a. Effect of injection and ignition timings on performance and emissions from a spark-ignition engine fueled with methanol. Fuel 89(12), 3919-3925.

AC C

748

TE D

745

Li, J., Gong, C.G., Wang, E.Y., et al., 2010b. Emissions of formaldehyde and unburned methanol from a spark-ignition methanol engine during cold start. Energy Fuels 24, 863-870.

754

Li, G., Zhang, C.H., Li, Y.Y., et al., 2016. Effects of diesel injection parameters on the rapid combustion and

755

emissions of an HD common-rail diesel engine fueled with diesel-methanol dual-fuel. Applied Thermal

756

Engineering 108, 1214-1225.

757 758

Li, W.F., Liu Z.C., Tian, J., et al., 2015. Effects of argon dilution on the thermal efficiency and exhaust emissions of a NG engine. International Journal of Automotive Technology 16(5), 721-31.

41

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Liu, J.H., Yao, A.R., Yao, C.D., et al., 2015. Effects of diesel injection pressure on the performance and

760

emissions of a HD common-rail diesel engine fueled with diesel/methanol dual fuel. Fuel 140,

761

192-200.

762 763

RI PT

759

Liu, H.Y., Wang, Z., Li, B.W., et al., 2016a. Exploiting new combustion regime using multiple premixed compression ignition (MPCI) fueled with gasoline/diesel/PODE (GDP). Fuel 186, 639-647.

Liu, H.Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, J., 2017a. Study on combustion and emission characteristics of

765

polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers/diesel blends in light-duty and heavy-duty diesel engines. Applied

766

Energy 185, 1393-1402.

769 770 771 772

M AN U

768

Liu, J.L, Wang, H., Li, Y., et al., 2016b. Effects of diesel/PODE (polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers) blends on combustion and emission characteristics in a heavy duty diesel engine. Fuel 177, 206-216. Liu, H., Wang, Z., Wang, J., et al., 2017b. Improvement of emission characteristics and thermal efficiency in diesel engines by fueling gasoline/diesel/PODEn blends. Energy 97, 105-112. Liu, S.H, Eddy, R., Cuty, C., et al., 2007. Study of spark ignition engine fueled with methanol/gasoline fuel

TE D

767

SC

764

blends. Applied Thermal Engineering 27, 1904-1910. Lisboa, C.C., Butterbachbahl, K., Mauder, M., et al., 2011. Bioethanol production from sugarcane and

774

emissions of greenhouse gases - known and unknowns. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 3(4),

775

277-292.

777 778 779 780 781

Liu, J., Yang, F.Y., Wang, H.W., et al., 2013. Effects of pilot fuel quantity on the emissions characteristics of a

AC C

776

EP

773

CNG/diesel dual fuel engine with optimized pilot injection timing. Energy 110, 201-206. Liu, J., Zhang, X., Wang, T., et al., 2015. Experimental and numerical study of the pollution formation in a diesel/CNG dual fuel engine. Fuel 159, 418-429. Liu, S.H, Eddy, R., Cuty, C., et al., 2007. Study of spark ignition engine fueled with methanol/gasoline fuel blends. Applied Thermal Engineering 27, 1904-1910.

782

Liu, Y., Dong, Y., Yeom, J.K., et al., 2012. An experimental investigation of the engine operating limit and

783

combustion characteristics of the RI-CNG engine. Journal of Mechanical Science & Technology 26(11),

42

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

785 786 787 788

3673-379. Lou, D., Tan, P., 2016. Present and future of the studies for diesel engines using biodiesel fuel. Automotive Safety and Energy 7(2), 123-134.

RI PT

784

Lounici, M.S., Loubar, K., Tarabet, L., et al., 2014. Towards improvement of natural gas-diesel dual fuel mode: an experimental investigation on performance and exhaust emissions. Energy 64, 200-211. Mathai, R., Malhotra, R.K., Subramanian, K.A., et al., 2012. Comparative evaluation of performance,

790

emission, lubricant and deposit characteristics of spark ignition engine fueled with CNG and 18%

791

hydrogen-CNG. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37(8), 6893-6900.

SC

789

Meng, X.Y., Li, Y.X., Nithyanandan, K., et al., 2016. Combustion and emission characteristics of a ci engine

793

operating in diesel-1-butanol/CNG dual fuel mode with low and high CNG substitution rates in light

794

load operation. In: ASME 2016 Internal Combustion Engine Fall Technical Conference, Greenville,

795

South Carolina, 2016.

M AN U

792

Miri, S.M., Seyedi, S.R.M., Ghobadian, B., 2016. Effects of biodiesel fuel synthesized from non-edible

797

rapeseed oil on performance and emission variables of diesel engines. Journal of Cleaner Production

798

142, 3798-3808.

TE D

796

Mosarof, M.H., Kalam, M.A., Masjuki, H.H., et al, 2015. Implementation of palm biodiesel based on economic

800

aspects, performance, emission, and wear characteristic. Energy Conversion & Management 105,

801

617-629.

803

AC C

802

EP

799

Mustafa, C., Ahmet, N.O., Ertan, A., et al., 2013. Impact of alcohol-gasoline fuel blends on the exhaust emission of an SI engine. Renewable Energy 52, 111-117.

804

Mustafa, K., Balki, C., 2014. The effect of compression ratio on the performance, emissions and combustion

805

of an SI (spark ignition) engine fueled with pure ethanol, methanol and unleaded gasoline. Energy 71,

806

194-201.

807 808

Nair, J.N., Kaviti, A.K., Daram, A.K., 2016. Analysis of performance and emission on compression ignition engine fuelled with blends of neem biodiesel. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum 26(4), 927-931.

43

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

810 811 812 813 814

Nanaki, E.A., Koroneos, C.J., 2012. Comparative LCA of the use of biodiesel, diesel and gasoline for transportation. Journal of Cleaner Production 20(1), 14-19. Ndayishimiye, P., Tazerout, M., 2011. Use of palm oil-based biofuel in the internal combustion engines:

RI PT

809

performance and emissions characteristics. Energy 36(3), 1790-1796.

Nithyanandan, K., Lin, Y.L., Donahue, R., et al., 2016. Characterization of soot from diesel-CNG dual-fuel combustion in a CI engine. Fuel 184, 145-152.

Nitnaware, P.T., Suryawanshi, J.G., 2016. Effects of MBT spark timing on performance emission and

816

combustion characteristics of SI engine using hydrogen-CNG blends. International Journal of

817

Hydrogen Energy 41(1), 666-674.

819

M AN U

818

SC

815

Nocker, L.D., Torfs, R. 1998. Comparison of LCA and external-cost analysis for biodiesel and diesel. In: 2nd International Conference LCA in Agriculture, Agro-industry and Forestry, Brussels, 1998. Oh, H., Bae, C., Min, K., et al., 2010. Spray and combustion characteristics of ethanol blended gasoline in a

821

spray guided DISI engine under lean stratified operation. SAE International Journal of Engines 3,

822

213-222.

825 826

alternative vehicle fuels in China. Applied Energy 90(1), 218-224.

EP

824

Ou X., Zhang X., 2013. Life-cycle analyses of energy consumption and GHG emissions of natural gas-based

Özener, O., Yüksek, L., Ergenç, A.T., et al., 2014. Effects of soybean biodiesel on a DI diesel engine performance, emission and combustion characteristics. Fuel 115, 875-883.

AC C

823

TE D

820

827

Özer, C., Öztürk, E., Solmaz, H., et al., 2016. Combined effects of soybean biodiesel fuel addition and EGR

828

application on the combustion and exhaust emissions in a diesel engine. Applied Thermal Engineering

829

95, 115-124.

830 831 832 833

Pan, W., Yao, C.D., Han, G.P., et al., 2015. The impact of intake air temperature on performance and exhaust emissions of a diesel methanol dual fuel engine. Fuel 162, 101-110. Park, S., Cho J., Park, J., et al., 2017. Numerical study of the performance and NOx emission of a diesel-methanol dual-fuel engine using multi-objective Pareto optimization. Energy 124, 272-283.

44

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

835 836 837

Park, S., 2012. Optimization of combustion chamber geometry and engine operating conditions for compression ignition engines fueled with dimethyl ether. Fuel 97, 61-71. Park, S.H., Lee, C.S., 2013. Combustion performance and emission reduction characteristics of automotive

RI PT

834

DME engine system. Progress in Energy & Combustion Science 39(1), 147-168.

Pellegrini, L., Marchionna, M., Patrini, R., et al., 2012. Combustion behaviour and emission performance of

839

neat and blended polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers in a light-duty diesel engine. SAE Paper,

840

2012-01-1053.

842 843 844

Pellegrini, L., Marchionna, M., Patrini, R., et al., 2013. Emission performance of neat and blended polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers in an old light-duty diesel car. SAE Paper, 2013-01-1035.

M AN U

841

SC

838

Prommes, K., Apanee, L., Samai J., 2007. Solubility of a diesel-biodiesel-ethanol blend, its fuel properties, and its emission characteristics from diesel engine. Fuel 86, 1053-1061. Qi, D.H., Chen, H., Geng, L.M., et al., 2010. Experimental studies on the combustion characteristics and

846

performance of a direct injection engine fueled with biodiesel/diesel blends. Energy Conversion &

847

Management 51(12), 2985-2992.

TE D

845

Qi, D.H., Geng, L.M., Chen, H., et al., 2009. Combustion and performance evaluation of a diesel engine

849

fueled with biodiesel produced from soybean crude oil. Renewable Energy 34(12), 2706-2713.

850

Qu, X., Gong, C.M., Liu, J.J., et al., 2015. Regulated and unregulated emissions from a DISI methanol engine under homogenous combustion and light load. Fuel 158, 166-175.

AC C

851

EP

848

852

Ravindra, K., Wauters, E., Tyagi, S.K., et al., 2006. Assessment of air quality after the implementation of

853

compressed natural gas (CNG) as fuel in public transport in Delhi, India. Environmental Monitoring &

854

Assessment 115(1), 405-17.

855

Roh, H.G., Lee, D., Chang, S.L., 2015. Impact of DME-biodiesel, diesel-biodiesel and diesel fuels on the

856

combustion and emission reduction characteristics of a CI engine according to pilot and single

857

injection strategies. Journal of the Energy Institute 88(4), 376-385.

858

Rose, L., Hussain, M., Ahmed, S., et al., 2013. A comparative life cycle assessment of diesel and

45

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

859

compressed natural gas powered refuse collection vehicles in a Canadian city. Energy Policy 52(3),

860

453-461.

866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876

RI PT

Serrano, M., Bouaid, A., Martinez, M., et al., 2013. Oxidation stability of biodiesel from different feedstocks:

SC

865

Power Sources 156(2), 497-511.

influence of commercial additives and purification step. Fuel 113, 50-58.

Shi, X.Y., Pang, X.B., Mu, Y.J., et al., 2015. Emission reduction potential of using ethanol-biodiesel-diesel

M AN U

864

Semelsberger, T.A., Borup, R.L., Greene, H.L., 2006. Dimethyl ether (DME) as an alternative fuel. Journal of

fuel blend on a heavy-duty diesel engine. Atmospheric Environment 40, 2567-2574. Shi, G.F., Chen, Y.Z., Chen, X.F., et al., 2012. Research progress in polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers. Natural gas chemical industry 37(2), 74-78.

Shi, L., Ji, C.W., Wang, S.F., et al., 2018. Combustion and emissions characteristics of a SI engine fueled

TE D

863

in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15, 3570-3574.

with gasoline-DME blends under different spark timings. Fuel 211, 11-17. Singh, A.P., Pal, A., Agarwal, A.K., 2016. Comparative particulate characteristics of hydrogen, CNG, HCNG, gasoline and diesel fueled engines. Fuel 185, 491-499.

EP

862

Sayah, A.K., Sayah, A.K., 2011. Wind-hydrogen utilization for methanol production: an economy assessment

Su, H.P., Chang, S.L., 2014. Applicability of dimethyl ether (DME) in a compression ignition engine as an alternative fuel. Energy Conversion & Management 86(10), 848-863.

AC C

861

877

Su, H.P., Shin, D., Park, J., 2016. Effect of ethanol fraction on the combustion and emission characteristics of

878

a dimethyl ether-ethanol dual-fuel reactivity controlled compression ignition engine. Applied Energy

879

182, 243-252.

880 881 882 883

Su, H.P., Yoon, S.H., Cha, J., et al., 2014. Mixing effects of biogas and dimethyl ether (DME) on combustion andemission characteristics of DME fueled high-speed diesel engine. Energy 66, 413-422. Sun, J., Caton, J.A., Jacobs, T.J., 2010. Oxides of nitrogen emissions from biodiesel-fuelled diesel engines. Progress in Energy & Combustion Science 36(6), 677-695.

46

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Stroefer, E., Hasse, H., Blagov, S., et al., 2010. Method for producing polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers from

885

methanol and formaldehyde. Available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7671240B2/en

886

(Accessed 19 March 2018).

887 888

RI PT

884

Turner, D., Xu, H.M., Roger F., et al., 2011. Combustion performance of bio-ethanol at various blend ratios in a gasoline direct injection engine. Fuel 90, 1999-2006.

Thomas, G., Feng, B., Veeraragavan, A., et al., 2014. Emissions from DME combustion in diesel engines and

890

their implications on meeting future emission norms: a review. Fuel Processing Technology 119,

891

286-304.

894 895 896 897

M AN U

893

Vancoillie, J., Demuynck, J., Sileghem, L., et al., 2013. The potential of methanol as a fuel for flex-fuel and dedicated spark-ignition engines. Energy 102, 140-149.

Vygintas, D., Martynas, R., Nadež, Z., 2017. Energy efficiency improvement adding various amounts of CNG in the naturally aspirated compression ignition engine. Procedia Engineering 187, 222-228. Wang, L.B., Yu, H.Y., He, X.F., et al., 2012. Influence of fatty acid composition of woody biodiesel plants on

TE D

892

SC

889

the fuel properties. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology 40(4), 397-404. Wang, L.J., Song, R.Z., Zou, H.B., 2008a. Study on combustion characteristics of a methanol -diesel

899

dual-fuel compression ignition engine. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D:

900

Journal of Automobile Engineering 222(4), 619-627.

902 903 904

Wang, Y., Li, G.B., Zhu, W., et al., 2008b. Study on the application of DME/diesel blends in a diesel engine.

AC C

901

EP

898

Fuel processing technology 89, 1272-1280. Wang, Y., Xing, Z., Xu, H., et al., 2016a. Emission factors of air pollutants from CNG-gasoline bi-fuel vehicles: part I. black carbon. Science of the Total Environment 572, 1161.

905

Wang, X., Ge, Y.S. Liu, L., et al., 2015. Evaluation on toxic reduction and fuel economy of a gasoline direct

906

injection- (GDI-) powered passenger car fueled with methanol–gasoline blends with various

907

substitution ratios. Applied Energy 157, 134-143.

908

Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Xiao, F., et al., 2014. Combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine with

47

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

909

DME as port premixing fuel under different injection timing. Energy Conversion & Management 77,

910

52-60.

912 913 914

Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Yang, Z., 2013. Dimethyl ether energy ratio effects in a dimethyl ether-diesel dual fuel

RI PT

911

premixed charge compression ignition engine. Applied Thermal Engineering 54(2), 481-487. Wang, Z., Li, L., Wang, J.X., et al., 2016b. Effect of biodiesel saturation on soot formation in diesel engines. Fuel 175, 240-248.

Wei, L., Cheung, C.S., Ning, Z., 2017. Influence of waste cooking oil biodiesel on combustion, unregulated

916

gaseous emissions and particulate emissions of a direct-injection diesel engine. Energy 127, 175-185.

917

Wei, L., Peng, G., 2016. A review on natural gas/diesel dual fuel combustion, emissions and performance.

922 923 924 925 926 927 928

M AN U

921

diesel engine using high premixed ratio of methanol and diesel fuel. Fuel 140, 156-163. Wu, B., Wang, L.J., Shen, X.W., 2016. Comparison of lean burn characteristics of an SI engine fueled with

TE D

920

Wei, L.J., Yao, C.D., Wang, Q.G., et al., 2015. Combustion and emission characteristics of a turbocharged

methanol and gasoline under idle condition. Applied Thermal Engineering 95, 264-270. Xie, M., Ma, Z.J., Wang, Q.H., et al., 2017. Investigation of engine combustion and emission performance fuelled with neat PODE and PODE/diesel blend. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University 51(3), 32-37.

EP

919

Fuel Processing Technology 142, 264-278.

Xu, H.E., Liang, Z., Zhao, L.M., et al., 2012. Experimental research on spray, ignition and combustion characteristics of biodiesel blend. Chinese Internal Combustion Engine Engineering 33(5), 41-45.

AC C

918

SC

915

Xu, Z., Luo, D.K., et al., 2017. Driving force of rising renewable energy in China: environment, regulation and employment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68, 48-56.

929

Yang, H., Li, X.H., Mu, M.F., 2015. Experiments on the performances and emissions of diesel engine fuelled

930

with diesel/polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers blends. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy 6(3),

931

280-285.

932

Yasin, M.H.M, Paruka, P., Mamat, R., et al., 2015. Effect of low proportion palm biodiesel blend on

933

performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine. Energy Procedia 75, 92-98.

48

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Youn, I.M., Su H.P., Roh, H.G., et al., 2011. Investigation on the fuel spray and emission reduction

935

characteristics for dimethyl ether (DME) fueled multi-cylinder diesel engine with common-rail injection

936

system. Fuel Processing Technology 92(7), 1280-1287.

937 938

RI PT

934

Yusaf, T.F., Yousif, B.F., Elawad, M.M., 2011. Crude palm oil fuel for diesel-engines: experimental and ANN simulation approaches. Energy 36(8), 4871-4878.

Zareei, J., Yusoff A.H., Abdullah, S., et al., 2012. Comparing the effects of hydrogen addition on performance

940

and exhaust emission in a spark ignition fueled with gasoline and CNG. Applied Mechanics and

941

Materials 165, 120-124.

943 944 945

Zeldovich, Y.B., 1946. The Oxidation of Nitrogen on Combustion and Explosions. Academy of Science of the

M AN U

942

SC

939

USSR, Moscow.

Zhao, Y.P., Xu, Z., Chen, H., et al., 2013. Mechanism of chain propagation for the synthesis of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers. Journal of Energy Chemistry 22(6), 833-836. Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Li, D., et al., 2014. Combustion and emission characteristics of a DME (dimethyl

947

ether)-diesel dual fuel premixed charge compression ignition engine with EGR (exhaust gas

948

recirculation). Energy 72, 608-617.

951 952

EP

950

Zhen X.D., Wang, Y., 2015. An overview of methanol as an internal combustion engine fuel. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 52, 477-493. Zhen, X.D., Wang, Y., Xu, S.Q., 2013. Numerical analysis on knock for a high compression ratio

AC C

949

TE D

946

spark-ignition methanol engine. Fuel 103, 892-898.

953

Zhu, L., Xiao, Y., Cheung, C.S., et al., 2016. Combustion, gaseous and particulate emission of a diesel

954

engine fueled with n-pentanol (C5 alcohol) blended with waste cooking oil biodiesel. Applied Thermal

955

Engineering 102, 73-79.

956 957 958

49

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

959

Dr. Yisong Chen is lecturer in Chang’an University, School of Automotive. He received his PhD degree in

961

vehicle engineering from Hunan University in China at 2014, done postdoctoral research at Tsinghua

962

University form 2014 to 2015. His research interests include alternative fuels of automobiles, life cycle

963

assessment of automotive and strategic research into the automotive industry in China.

M AN U

SC

960

965

TE D

964

Dr. Hao Chen is an associate professor in Chang’an University, School of Automotive. He obtained his

967

PhD degree and Master degree in vehicle engineering from Chang’an University. He is interested in

968

the fields of alternative fuels of automobiles, diesel engine, engine and fault diagnosis, life cycle

969

assessment of automotive, etc.

AC C

EP

966

50