- Email: [email protected]
Erratum to “A numerical dynamo benchmark” [Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 128 (1–4) (2001) 25–34]
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 172 (2009) 356
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pepi
Erratum
Erratum to “A numerical dynamo benchmark” [Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 128 (1–4) (2001) 25–34] U.R. Christensen a,∗ , J. Aubert b , P. Cardin c , E. Dormy d , S. Gibbons e , G.A. Glatzmaier f , E. Grote g , Y. Honkura h , C. Jones i , M. Kono h , M. Matsushima h , A. Sakuraba j , F. Takahashi h , A. Tilgner k , J. Wicht a , K. Zhang l a
Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Max-Planck-Strasse 2, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany Dynamique des Fluides Géologiques, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 5, France LGIT, Observatoire de Grenoble, Université Joseph Fourier and CNRS, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 09, France d Département de Physique, École normale supérieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France e NORSAR, N-2027 Kjeller, Norway f Earth Sciences Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA g Theoretische Physik IV, Universität Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany h Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan i Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK j Department of Earth and Planetary Physics, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan k Institut für Geophysik, Universität Göttingen, Friedrich Hund Platz, 37077 Gottingen, Germany l Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK b c
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 18 September 2008 Accepted 19 September 2008
It has been pointed out to us that Table 4, which lists the recommended standard values for the solution to the benchmark problems, contains a typographical error. In case 1 the correct value for the kinetic energy Ekin is 30.773 ± 0.020 (not 30.733 ± 0.020). We thank Andrew Jackson for drawing attention to this error, which could be confusing when testing a dynamo code at a high precision level.
DOI of original article:10.1016/S0031-9201(01)00275-8. ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (U.R. Christensen). 0031-9201/$ – see front matter © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2008.09.014
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pepi
Erratum
Erratum to “A numerical dynamo benchmark” [Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 128 (1–4) (2001) 25–34] U.R. Christensen a,∗ , J. Aubert b , P. Cardin c , E. Dormy d , S. Gibbons e , G.A. Glatzmaier f , E. Grote g , Y. Honkura h , C. Jones i , M. Kono h , M. Matsushima h , A. Sakuraba j , F. Takahashi h , A. Tilgner k , J. Wicht a , K. Zhang l a
Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Max-Planck-Strasse 2, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany Dynamique des Fluides Géologiques, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 5, France LGIT, Observatoire de Grenoble, Université Joseph Fourier and CNRS, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 09, France d Département de Physique, École normale supérieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France e NORSAR, N-2027 Kjeller, Norway f Earth Sciences Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA g Theoretische Physik IV, Universität Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany h Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan i Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK j Department of Earth and Planetary Physics, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan k Institut für Geophysik, Universität Göttingen, Friedrich Hund Platz, 37077 Gottingen, Germany l Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, UK b c
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history: Received 18 September 2008 Accepted 19 September 2008
It has been pointed out to us that Table 4, which lists the recommended standard values for the solution to the benchmark problems, contains a typographical error. In case 1 the correct value for the kinetic energy Ekin is 30.773 ± 0.020 (not 30.733 ± 0.020). We thank Andrew Jackson for drawing attention to this error, which could be confusing when testing a dynamo code at a high precision level.
DOI of original article:10.1016/S0031-9201(01)00275-8. ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (U.R. Christensen). 0031-9201/$ – see front matter © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2008.09.014