- Email: [email protected]
Erratum to “Energy flow in a hadronic cascade: Application to hadron calorimetry” [Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 572 (2007) 633–653]
ARTICLE IN PRESS Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 593 (2008) 638
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/nima
Erratum
Erratum to ‘‘Energy flow in a hadronic cascade: Application to hadron calorimetry’’ [Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 572 (2007) 633– 653] Donald E. Groom Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 50R6008, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Four errors have been found in the paper, the first of which is serious:
1. In Fig. 13 the labels ‘‘Intrinsic em’’ and ‘‘Intrinsic had’’ were reversed. The difference in curvatures is essential to understanding Eq. (15). 2. In Table 3 there was an error in the upper right entry, which should be 372% rather than 318%, and 3. an error in footnote (a), which should read: a
sp0 ¼ s1 ðE=100 GeVÞs2 .
4. There was a sign error in footnote 4 on p. 635, which should read: 4
A slightly better fit is obtained with 0:126 0:0099 lnðE=100 GeVÞ.
E (GeV) 50
E - dependent variance contributions (arbitrarily normalized to same at 50 GeV)
40
0.03
100
200
Sampling Intrinsic em Intrinsic had
0.02
0.01
0.00
1/E (GeV−1) Fig. 13. Shapes of contributions to sampling and intrinsic variance. As 1=E ! 0, the slopes of the sampling and p0 contributions approach finite constants, since p=e ! 1 and f p0 ! 1, while the slope of the intrinsic hadronic contribution approaches zero (f h ! 0).
DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.11.070
Tel.: +1 510 486 6788; fax: +1 510 486 4799.
E-mail address: [email protected] 0168-9002/$ - see front matter & 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.05.045
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/nima
Erratum
Erratum to ‘‘Energy flow in a hadronic cascade: Application to hadron calorimetry’’ [Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 572 (2007) 633– 653] Donald E. Groom Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 50R6008, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Four errors have been found in the paper, the first of which is serious:
1. In Fig. 13 the labels ‘‘Intrinsic em’’ and ‘‘Intrinsic had’’ were reversed. The difference in curvatures is essential to understanding Eq. (15). 2. In Table 3 there was an error in the upper right entry, which should be 372% rather than 318%, and 3. an error in footnote (a), which should read: a
sp0 ¼ s1 ðE=100 GeVÞs2 .
4. There was a sign error in footnote 4 on p. 635, which should read: 4
A slightly better fit is obtained with 0:126 0:0099 lnðE=100 GeVÞ.
E (GeV) 50
E - dependent variance contributions (arbitrarily normalized to same at 50 GeV)
40
0.03
100
200
Sampling Intrinsic em Intrinsic had
0.02
0.01
0.00
1/E (GeV−1) Fig. 13. Shapes of contributions to sampling and intrinsic variance. As 1=E ! 0, the slopes of the sampling and p0 contributions approach finite constants, since p=e ! 1 and f p0 ! 1, while the slope of the intrinsic hadronic contribution approaches zero (f h ! 0).
DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.11.070
Tel.: +1 510 486 6788; fax: +1 510 486 4799.
E-mail address: [email protected] 0168-9002/$ - see front matter & 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2008.05.045