Erratum to “Tuning metalloporphyrin and metallophthalocyanine redox potentials using ligand electrochemical (EL) and Hammett (σp) parametrization” [Coord. Chem. Rev. 216–217 (2001) 45–54]

Erratum to “Tuning metalloporphyrin and metallophthalocyanine redox potentials using ligand electrochemical (EL) and Hammett (σp) parametrization” [Coord. Chem. Rev. 216–217 (2001) 45–54]

Coordination Chemistry Reviews 222 (2001) 273 www.elsevier.com/locate/ccr Erratum Erratum to ‘‘Tuning metalloporphyrin and metallophthalocyanine red...

37KB Sizes 0 Downloads 46 Views

Coordination Chemistry Reviews 222 (2001) 273 www.elsevier.com/locate/ccr

Erratum

Erratum to ‘‘Tuning metalloporphyrin and metallophthalocyanine redox potentials using ligand electrochemical (EL) and Hammett (|p) parametrization’’ [Coord. Chem. Rev. 216–217 (2001) 45–54] Christos Alexiou, A.B.P. Lever* Department of Chemistry, York Uni6ersity, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, ON, Canada M3J IP3

The publisher regrets that in the Summary (Section 3) an argument was inadvertently inverted. It should have read: Recall that small coefficients, B 1, infer that the axial ligand forms a more stable complex with the higher oxidation state ion than with the lower oxidation state ion [54], relative to the RuIII/RuII ratio, and vice versa for large coefficients, \ 1.



PII of original article: S 0 0 1 0 - 8 5 4 5 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 3 5 0 - 2. * Corresponding author. Tel.: + 1-416-736-5246; fax: + 1-416-736-5936. E-mail address: [email protected] (A.B.P. Lever).

0010-8545/01/$ - see front matter © 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. PII: S 0 0 1 0 - 8 5 4 5 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 4 2 9 - 5