- Email: [email protected]
Erythrocyte Consumption of Nitric Oxide: Competition Experiment and Model Analysis
NITRIC OXIDE: Biology and Chemistry Vol. 5, No. 4, p. 425 (2001) All articles available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on
ERRATUM Volume 5, Number 1 (2001), in the article “Erythrocyte Consumption of Nitric Oxide: Competition Experiment and Model Analysis,” by Mark W. Vaughn, Kuang-Tse Huang, Lih Kuo, and James C. Liao, pages 18 –31 (doi: 10.1006/niox.2000.0328): On page 29, Eq. [A.11] should read 1 d 2 d 2kd 关SpNO兴0 a 2 ⫺kdt kHba 2 关oxyHb兴ext关NO兴 ⫹ e ⫽0 r 关NO兴 ⫺ 2 r dr dr Ᏸext 关NO兴maxᏰext
[A.11]
instead of 1 d 2 d 2关SpNO兴0 a 2 kHba 2 r 关NO兴 ⫺ 关oxyHb兴ext关NO兴 ⫹ e ⫺kdt ⫽ 0 2 r dr dr Ᏸext 关NO兴maxᏰext关oxyHb兴0 [A.11] and Eq. [A.14] should read k Hba 2 kHb,cyta 2 2kd 关SpNO兴0 a 2 aP , , , Ᏸext Ᏸcyt 关NO兴maxᏰext Ᏸext
[A.14]
k Hba 2 kHb,cyta 2 2关SpNO兴0 a 2 aP , , 关oxyHb兴0 , . Ᏸext Ᏸcyt 关NO兴maxᏰext Ᏸext
[A.14]
instead of
The correct expressions were used for the computations in this article, so these typographical errors have no bearing on the results or conclusions presented. The authors have also found that some readers have questions about the time– course data in Figs. 2 and 3, on pages 22 and 23, respectively. In these figures, time zero refers to the NO donor addition. Zero time is explicitly taken into account so that the decay of NO donor can tracked. However, to make comparisons between different blood samples straightforward, the metHb production at the first sample point is normalized to zero. This erratum is doi:10.1006/niox.2001.0388.
Copyright © 2001 by Academic Press All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
425
ERRATUM Volume 5, Number 1 (2001), in the article “Erythrocyte Consumption of Nitric Oxide: Competition Experiment and Model Analysis,” by Mark W. Vaughn, Kuang-Tse Huang, Lih Kuo, and James C. Liao, pages 18 –31 (doi: 10.1006/niox.2000.0328): On page 29, Eq. [A.11] should read 1 d 2 d 2kd 关SpNO兴0 a 2 ⫺kdt kHba 2 关oxyHb兴ext关NO兴 ⫹ e ⫽0 r 关NO兴 ⫺ 2 r dr dr Ᏸext 关NO兴maxᏰext
[A.11]
instead of 1 d 2 d 2关SpNO兴0 a 2 kHba 2 r 关NO兴 ⫺ 关oxyHb兴ext关NO兴 ⫹ e ⫺kdt ⫽ 0 2 r dr dr Ᏸext 关NO兴maxᏰext关oxyHb兴0 [A.11] and Eq. [A.14] should read k Hba 2 kHb,cyta 2 2kd 关SpNO兴0 a 2 aP , , , Ᏸext Ᏸcyt 关NO兴maxᏰext Ᏸext
[A.14]
k Hba 2 kHb,cyta 2 2关SpNO兴0 a 2 aP , , 关oxyHb兴0 , . Ᏸext Ᏸcyt 关NO兴maxᏰext Ᏸext
[A.14]
instead of
The correct expressions were used for the computations in this article, so these typographical errors have no bearing on the results or conclusions presented. The authors have also found that some readers have questions about the time– course data in Figs. 2 and 3, on pages 22 and 23, respectively. In these figures, time zero refers to the NO donor addition. Zero time is explicitly taken into account so that the decay of NO donor can tracked. However, to make comparisons between different blood samples straightforward, the metHb production at the first sample point is normalized to zero. This erratum is doi:10.1006/niox.2001.0388.
Copyright © 2001 by Academic Press All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
425