Journal of the Less-Common Metals, 164 & 165 (1990) 768-775
768
Field-induced
transformations
spin ordering D. Petitgrand, Laboratoire
of the
in NdaCu04
A.H. Moudden*,
P. Galez and P. Boutrouille
LBon Brillouin, CEA-CNRS,
CEN/Saclay,
F-91191 Gif/Yvette
Abstract Using elastic neutron scattering, we show first that at zero field NdpCuOq
undergoes
ated with the Cu++
successive magnetic spins .
phase transitions
A phase I with LaaNiOd
associ-
magnetic
type structure is stabilized between TN x 250K and Tl x 80K and a phase II with a La&u04 tween TI and Tz M 30K.
magnetic type structure is formed beBelow Tz a phase III with a magnetic
structure similar to that of phase I, is stabilized down to the lowest temperatures.
When a small magnetic field, up to about 2 Tesla,
is continuously
applied perpendicular
(1, -l,O),
the magnetic
continuously
reflections
to the tetragonal
(l/2,1/2,1)
axis along
with odd integers 1
vanish in the stability region of phases I and III , while
the intensity of those with even integers 1 increases . However in the region of phase II the opposite occurs: even 1 reflections continuously vanish and odd 1 reflections are enhanced. The results indicate that at relatively
small field of about 0.7 Tesla, a single magnetic
domain with collinear spins is stabilized.
Further, detailed studies of
the reversibility of these transformations
upon the applied field show
no significant hysteresis, suggestive of a continuous
transformation
from non collinear spins structures at zero field into their collinear analogues at high field.
* On leave of absence from Laboratoire
de Physique des Solides
Orsay. 0022-5088/90/$3.50
0 Elsevier Sequoia, Printed in The Netherlands
169
1. Introduction The magnetic
properties
NdzCu04
parents
It was shown magnetic
of the electron
and PrzCu04 in particular
phase transitions
doped
have been NdzCuOd
that
associated
superconductors’
extensively
studied2-?
undergoes
3
at least
with the ordering
of the Cu++
spins. A phase I with LazNi04 magnetic type structure is stabilized between TN M 25OK and T1 NN80K and a phase II with a La2Cu04 magnetic type structure is formed between Tl and T2 M 30K. Below Tz a phase III, with a magnetic stucture similar to that of phase I, is stabilized down behaviour, P&u04 La2NiOl
magnetic
temperatures. been
speculated7 phase
any
lattice have
distortion been
eracy
which
with
difficult
the magnetic
structures
domains
state
versibility
The
distor-
two systems
at all temperatures. spatial
degen-
somewhat
more
difficult
have been
used
to solve
however
because
averaging, should
of the
the question
of whether
be described
in terms
is still to be answered. a relatively
struc-
Using
small magnetic
elastic
of
neutron
field induces
spin reorientation,
and by a detailed
studies
of this transformation
we will show that
it is very likely to
be a transformation
from non collinear
structure
stable
magnetic
structure.
spins in a tetragonal
at zero field into a collinear
out on the Laboratoire The incident
spins
has
did not detect
introduces
two systems,
in Nd2CuOa
we will show that
a continuous
symmetry
structure
lowest
in La2Co04.
No detectable
as we115.
non collinear of these
of multi
or multi-q
scattering,
and
structure
problem
the magnetic single-q
makes
successive occur’
studies’
peaks.
structure
to the
in Nd2CuOd
which
diffraction
the tetragonal
down
an underlying
to those
in PrzCu04
of the nuclear
Collinear
the magnetic
X-ray
250K
reorientation
or superlattice
reported
basically
from
similar
high resolution
from
spin
as resulting
The tetragonality to solve.
structure
successive
transitions
Detailed tion
type
The
tural
remain
to the lowest temperatures. In contrast to this undergoes a unique magnetic transition5 into
neutron
The neutron
scattering
Leon Brillouin momentum
of the remagnetic
spins in an orthorhombic experiments
4F2 triple
were carried
axis spectrometer
was ki = 2.662A1-i
and a pyrolytic
graphite PG filter was used to suppress higher order contaminations. The single crystal of Nd2CuOd of about 10 x 10 x 10mm3 was placed in a superconducting magnet with the (1, -1,0) axis vertical so that magnetic reflections with indices (h/2, h/2,1), referring to the nuclear space group 14/mmm, can be measured.
.
2. Results and Discussions In figure 1 we show the temperature
variation of the integrated
intensity of the magnetic Bragg reflections (l/2,1/2,1) zero filed using scans along
I
(0, 0,1) direction. Clearly the anomalies t
’
, measured at
I
I
H=O
0 0
Fig I.
50
The temperature
100 150 200 250 300 Temperature [K]
dependence
of the integrated
intensity
of the
mug~etic (1/2,1/2,a) re~2ec tions at ~ero~e~d, shows the e~‘ste~ce of at least 9 different magnetic phases I, II and III. The intermediate phase
II is characterized
peak (l/2,1/2,0) perature phases
by the existence
of the
magnetic
wh’zch is absent in both the high and low temI and III. The solid lines are a guide for the
eye.
seen in the variation are indicative of 3 magnetic phases as reported earlier3~***. The phase I and III stable above 80K and below 30K respectively are compatible with a LasNi04 magnetic type structure. The intermediate phase II characterized by the presence of the magnetic Bragg peak (l/2,1/2,0) between 30 and 80K, is compatible with a LazCu04 magnetic type structure. In figure 2 we
report the analogous data when a magnetic field of 2 Tesla is applied parallel to (1, -1,0) . The magnetic reflection (l/2,1/2,0) is completely suppressed, however one can still distinguish between 3 different temperature regions. The high and low temperature regions (I, III) are now specifically characterized by magnetic reflections (l/2,1/2,1) with even integers 1 only, whereas the intermediate phase (II) is characterized by odd integers 1 only.
'H=ZT'
0-
1 2i
0
Fig 8. The temperature magnetic
50
100 150 200 250 300 Temperature [K]
dependence
(l/2,1/2,1)
of the integrated intensities
of the
re+!Iec tions is shown when a magnetic field
H = 2 Tesla is applied along the (1, - 1,O) direction.
The mag-
is ~~~preas~d~ however one can stdl netic resection (l/2,1/2,0) distinguish 3 diflerent temperature regions. The high and low temperature regions (I, III) are now specifically characterized by magnetic reflections (l/2,1/2, a) with even integer 1 only, whereas the intermediate phase (II) is characterized by odd integer I only.
112
This field-induced be accounted
selection
assuming,
netic structures
discussed
at H=2 Tesla correspond of type
the collinear
previously
LazCuOd
to a single domain
in the region
of collinear
Bragg
peaks.
the magnetic
of the integrated
A small
field of about
reflections
(l/2,1/2,1)
small
filed of about
peaks
I and III, and
II. temperature intensity
region
T x
of the magnetic
1 Tesla is sufficient with even integer
those corresponding to odd integer T M 1OOK , figure 4 shows the relatively
of the magspins and per-
in the regions
In figure 3 we show, in the intermediate 50K, the field dependence
version
at zero field. The observed
to the field, of type LanNiOd
pendicular
1 , can unambiguously
rule odd/even
exclusively
to suppress 1 and enhance
1 . In the high temperature region opposite selection rule. Again a
1 Tesla
suppresses
in this
region
the
1000
3
*i 800 $
600
0
Fig 3. The magnetic shown
1
2 3 4 Magnetic Field [T]
field dependence
in the intermediate
5
of the integrated
temperature
region
intensities
(50K)
is
, A small
field of about I Tesla is suficient to suppress the magnetic reflections (l/2,1/2,1) with even integer 1 and enhance those corresponding to odd integer 1 . The solid lines are a guide for the eye.
113
magnetic
reflections
(l/2,1/2,1)
with
odd
integers
1 and
enhances
the even-l-reflections. The variation upon
the
temperature scanning spins
magnetic
region up and
versibility
of the integrated
applied
(III).
down
No significant the magnetic
is very suggestive
at all temperature
picture
which considers
spins equally unlikely.
including
field within phases
I and
with their
field.
The I
I
expect
is observed 2 Tesla.
to observe
II. The
re-
alternating
with collinear
domains
seems very
irreversible
transdomain I
I
I
T= 100 K
1000
0
II
I
O
Fig 4. The magnetic shown
This
size of one antiferromagnetic I
low when
of the Cu++
domains
90” rotatedd
peaks
5 , for the
reorientation
at zero field magnetic
distributed under
of the magnetic in figure
hysteresis
of a continuous
In this case one would
formations
intensity
field is shown
1
field
I
I
I
2 3 4 Magnetic Field [T] dependence
in the high temperature
of the integrated region I .
L
5
intensities
is
1000
rh
‘2
600
3 600 a .$ 400 @lI 2 200
0
B B B
A
B
= 21 K = [i/2 l/2 13 Increasing H Decreasing H
B t.2
g
Is
4
0
0
0
Fig 5.
The
variation
of
0.5 1.0 1.5 magnetic Field [T] the
integrated intensities
2.0
of the magnetic
peaks
upon the ~~~~~e~magnetic field is shown in the low temperatature region
(III).
No significant hysteresis is observed when scanning
up and down the magnetic field within 2 Tesla.
would increase to the detriment of its 90’ counter part.
Further a
single domain with collinear spins could be stabilized at zero field after recycling the crystal at high field. This is not what we observe, the zero field state is always observed
with no odd/even
selection
rule. 3. Conclusion In conclusion we suggest that the magnetic phases I, II and III of Nd&.?uO~ at zero field have non collinear spins . The phases I and III must be a coherent superposition with its 90° rotated domain. superposition
of the La&u04
of the LaaNiO*
collinear structure
Whereas the phase II is a coherent collinear structure with its 90” counter
part . The field induced magnetic transformations we have observed in the three phases can be seen as a continuous reorientation of the spins from the non collinear magnetic
type structure at zero field
into their collinear version at high field. The magnetic field induces double-q to single-q tr~sformations.
References
1 Y. Tokura, H. Takagi and S. Uchida, Nature 377, 345 (1989); H. Takagi et al Phys. Rev. Lett. 39,1197, 2 G.M. Luke et al , Nature 338,49
(1989)
(1989)
3 J. Akimitsu et al, J. Phys. Sot. Japn. 58, 2646 (1989) 4 Y. Endoh, M. Matsuda, K. Yamada, K. Kakurai, Y. Hidaka, G. Shirane and R.J. Birgeneau, Phys. Rev. B. 40, 7023 (1989) 5 D.E. Cox, A.I. Goldman, M.A. Subramanian, J. Gopalakrishnan and A.W. Sleight, Phys. Rev. B. 40, 6998 (1989) 6 K. Yamada et al, Phys. Rev. B. 39, 2336 (1989) 7 S. Skanthakumar et al, Physica C 160, 120, (1989) 8 M. Matsuda et al (1990) ( to be published)