fog retrieval for the Atacama Desert

fog retrieval for the Atacama Desert

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Remote Sensing of Environment journal homepage: www.elsevi...

4MB Sizes 2 Downloads 56 Views

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Remote Sensing of Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rse

A new high spatial resolution low stratus/fog retrieval for the Atacama Desert

T

Lukas W. Lehnerta,b,∗, Boris Thiesb, Jörg Bendixb a b

Department of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Luisenstr. 37, 80333 Munich, Germany Faculty of Geography, Philipps-University of Marburg, Deutschhausstr. 10, 35037 Marburg, Germany

A R T I C LE I N FO

A B S T R A C T

Keywords: Landsat Low stratus Fog Atacama desert Cloud optical depth Effective radius Liquid water path

The Atacama Desert is considered as one of the driest places on Earth. At the coastline, however, small-scale fog oases harbor a specialized vegetation and fauna, living from moisture by fog, which is used by humans to feed water demands of industrial projects. To date, knowledge about fog and low stratus (FLS) clouds as well as their physical properties is limited in that only local observations or spatial products from satellites with coarse resolutions are available generally failing to capture local patterns resulting from the complex topography. Consequently, we provide the first climatology of FLS with 30 m spatial resolution based on over 400 Landsat scenes acquired since 1986. The new product provides valuable estimates of FLS optical and micro-physical properties. FLS over the Pacific Ocean featured cloud optical depth values around 13.5 declining over land to 4.2. Effective radii were around 5.3 μm. Liquid water path was between 71.0 gm−2 over the Ocean and 14.9 gm−2 over land surfaces. The climatologies of the new Landsat product were successfully validated against those of the MODIS cloud property product over homogeneous surfaces. Over areas with heterogeneous topographies, the new product outperforms existing ones with coarse spatial resolutions if compared against in situ measurements. This shows the general need for cloud products with high spatial resolutions in areas where the development of small scale clouds is favored e.g., by a complex topography leading to systematical biases in existing retrievals.

1. Introduction Fog provides the most important source of freshwater for ecosystems in one of the driest regions on earth, the Atacama Desert. Near the coastline, high fog water fluxes allow the existence of ecosystems diverse in specialized organisms (Borthagaray et al., 2010; Muenchow et al., 2013; Rundel et al., 1996) in a surrounding characterized by the near absence of life where fog is missing (Navarro-Gonzalez, 2003; Garreaud et al., 2010). However, fog in these areas does not only play a role in natural ecosystems, it is also crucial for local human societies because fog water is collected to feed industrial needs (Carter et al., 2007). In the coastal area of the Atacama Desert, fog occurrences are often patchy and local distances between areas with high and low occurrence are short (Cereceda et al., 2002; Lehnert et al., 2018; Sträter et al., 2010). This leads to small-scale fog oases (locally called ‘Loma’). One of the most famous fog oasis is in the National Park Fray Jorge (Squeo et al., 2016; Garreaud et al., 2008), but there are numerous other examples such as Las Lomitas in the Pan de Azúcar National Park (Lehnert et al., 2018) or Alto Patache to the south of Iquique (Muñoz-Schick



et al., 2001). Fog occurrence is typically monitored at climate stations equipped with instruments such as fog collectors or visibility sensors (e.g., Gultepe et al., 2015; Schemenauer and Cereceda, 1994). Those measurements have several drawbacks: first, energy consumption and maintenance costs are high which is problematic in remote areas. Subsequently, available time series are short. Second, the instruments report only point based information which may not necessarily be representative for larger areas if fog heterogeneity is high. This leads to the general problem that spatially-explicit estimates of fog water fluxes can only be generated if a dense network of stations is available. An alternative approach is using satellite data to evaluate spatiotemporal patterns of fog occurrences. Among the existing products based on geostationary data, Cermak and Bendix (2008), Cermak et al. (2009) and Egli et al. (2016) provided fully automatic FLS retrievals for central Europe using Meteosat 8 data and Cereceda et al. (2008) provided a frequency map of low clouds for northern Chile using GOES images. For the Namib Desert, a FLS retrieval based on Meteosat data has been provided by Andersen and Cermak (2018). However, the spatial resolution of current geostationary sensors (2 to 4 km) is by far

Corresponding author. Department of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Luisenstr. 37, 80333 Munich, Germany. E-mail address: [email protected] (L.W. Lehnert).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111445 Received 18 January 2019; Received in revised form 12 September 2019; Accepted 23 September 2019 0034-4257/ © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445

L.W. Lehnert, et al.

2.1. Study area

too coarse to provide reliable spatial estimations above rugged terrain such as nearby the coast of the Atacama Desert. Products of low Earth orbiters with higher spatial resolutions would be an alternative. Based on 1 km AVHRR data, Bendix (2002) created a 10-year FLS climatology for Central Europe. Beside the FLS frequency, he also investigated the micro-physical properties to characterize the potential water input provided by FLS. However, Lehnert et al. (2018) showed that a 1 km spatial resolution provided by AVHRR or MODIS is not sufficient to capture local FLS patterns in the Atacama Desert. Consequently, we developed a novel fog/low stratus product based on Landsat data with 30 m spatial resolution. The disadvantage of Landsat is its long revisiting time. However, as Landsat has been available for decades, a high number of scenes is available. In addition to the long time series provided by the Landsat mission, its advantage is that it can provide new in-sights into the spatially heterogeneous cloud frequencies and mirco-physical parameters which are essential for ecosystems and human societies. Based on over 400 Landsat scenes acquired between 1986 and 2018, we provide the first FLS frequency maps at 30 m spatial resolution of the southern part of the Atacama Desert. Climatologies of FLS optical and micro-physical properties are also presented. In this context, we hypothesize that (1) FLS optical and micro-physical properties in the new product are similar to those from existing ones with lower spatial but higher temporal resolution over spatially homogeneous areas such as the Pacific Ocean. In contrast, (2) FLS optical and micro-physical properties differ largely between the low and high resolution products over spatially heterogeneous areas, where Landsat estimates show a close correlation to in situ data. This would generally highlight the need for high spatial resolution atmospheric remote sensing in areas where clouds are heavily influenced by complex topographies.

The regional focus of this study is set to the southern part of the Atacama Desert in Chile (69°12′ W – 71°32′ W and 24°56′ S – 27°03’ S) which roughly corresponds to Landsat path 1, row 78 (NASA, 2019). The study area includes the Pan de Azúcar National Park famous for its fog oasis. Local terrain is characterized by a mountain ridge at the coast reaching altitudes above 700 m a.s.l. with steep slopes to the coast and gently declining ones toward the hinterland. Local climate is arid with occasional rainfall (long term average below 13 mm per year) and mean temperatures between 13 °C and 20 °C in July and January, respectively (Rundel et al., 1996; Thompson et al., 2003). As a consequence of the stable inversion layer and the cold Humboldt current, low stratus clouds develop frequently over the Pacific Ocean influencing the coastal areas if the clouds are advected. Beside those large scale clouds, heterogeneous small scale orographic fog develops during uplift at the coastal ridge leading to small scale fog oases (Lehnert et al., 2018) and providing water for local industrial projects (Carter et al., 2007). 2.2. Data All available Landsat satellite scenes acquired by Landsat 4, 5 and 8 have been downloaded from USGS Earth Explorer for the area of the Pan de Azúcar National Park. Landsat ETM + scenes have not been considered due to the scan line error causing stripes without any data in the images (e.g., Zhang et al., 2007). Scenes which were totally free of clouds were selected and processed separately. Altogether 499 scenes have been processed covering a time period from February 1986 to April 2018. Details on yearly and monthly frequencies of Landsat scenes are provided in Fig. 2. The MODIS cloud properties product (MOD06 & MYD06, collection 6, Platnick et al., 2017) has been used to validate the FLS climatology obtained by the Landsat data. Therefore, all available scenes for the area of investigation of the Aqua and Terra platform were downloaded and georeferenced using the MODIS Swath reprojection tool. As auxiliary data, the Aster digital elevation model was used (Tachikawa et al., 2011). NCEP reanalysis data were used for the vertical structure of the atmosphere at overpass times of Landsat (Kalnay et al., 1996) and the TOMS AURA program delivered the Ozone content of the atmosphere (Dobber et al., 2006; Levelt et al., 2006).

2. Methods This section first gives an overview about the study's area of interest followed by a description of the data used to develop the new FLS product. In the main part, a detailed description is presented how the micro-physical properties of FLS are derived and validated. A graphical description of the main processing steps is shown in Fig. 1.

2.3. Preprocessing of landsat data Clouds in the Landsat scenes have been identified using two different approaches (Fig. 1). The Fmask algorithm uses top of the atmosphere reflectance values and brightness temperatures and was applied to all pixels (Zhu and Woodcock, 2012). However, it is known that the algorithm fails to reliably distinguish between clouds and clear conditions at the coastline (Ernst et al., 2018) because of the bright background and the frequently occurring sea spray. Therefore, for each pixel a separate threshold (pixel-wise) was used in the coastal area, instead. A pixel in this study refers to a single raster grid cell (observation) in the Landsat (30 × 30 m) or MODIS (1000 × 1000 m) images. To derive the threshold between clouds and surface, the entire time series of collocated Landsat scenes has been used and separate histograms were computed for each pixel using the top of the atmosphere reflectances of the blue band. Here, bimodal distribution functions were observed where the lower and upper maximum values corresponded to reflectance values under clear sky and cloudy conditions, respectively. Consequently, the reflectance at the minimum frequency between both maximum values has been used as threshold to distinguish between clouds and clear sky conditions. Cloud-free scenes were atmospherically and topographically corrected to obtain accurate background reflectance values of the surface below the clouds (Fig. 1). We focused on the green and shortwave

Fig. 1. Flow chart of the methodology. 2

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445

L.W. Lehnert, et al.

2.4.1. Theoretical background Radiation interacts differently with clouds depending on the wavelengths. At wavelength below 0.7 μm , radiation is not absorbed by water clouds. Consequently, cloud albedo is a function of cloud optical depth (τ) as demonstrated by Stephens et al. (1984):

τ=

∫z

z2

1

Ac μ0 3LWC dz = 2ρre (1 − Ac ) β (μ0 )

(1)

Here, LWC is the liquid water content, re is the effective radius and ρ is the density of liquid water. Ac is the cloud top albedo at a nonabsorbing wavelength, μ0 is the cosine of the solar zenith angle and β (μ0 ) is the fraction of incident radiation scattered back to the satellite sensor. Cloud effective radius depends on the distribution of cloud droplet sizes: ∞

re =

∫0 r 3n (r )dr ∞ ∫0 r 2n (r )dr

(2)

Here, r is the droplet size and r (n) is the droplet size distribution. From equations (1) and (2) it follows:

re =

3 LWP 2 ρτ

(3)

Here, LWP is the liquid water path of the cloud column. Nakajima and King (1990) demonstrated that re and τ can be derived using a bi-spectral approach because τ is mainly influencing cloud albedo at nonabsorbing wavelength whereas re can be derived from the albedo in an absorbing channel in the shortwave infrared region of the electromagnetic radiation. Consequently, a radiative transfer model can be used to simulate cloud albedo values in relation to observing and illumination geometries, effective radius and optical depth. For further details, see Nakajima and King (1990), Nakajima et al. (1991) and Nakajima and Nakajma (1995). In general, the approach has been proven to provide reliable estimates compared to ground truth measurements (Nakajima and Nakajma, 1995). In their extensive validation study, the authors could demonstrate that mainly the sun zenith angle influenced the error rates with decreasing accuracy for angles >40 °. Since Landsat overpasses northern Chile at early afternoon, we assume that illumination geometries meet the requirements for accurate estimations.

Fig. 2. Number of Landsat scenes per year (a) and month (b) used for the high spatial resolution low stratus/fog retrieval. Note that all scenes cover the same area around the fog oasis at Pan de Azúcar National Park.

infrared bands because those were later used to derive optical and micro-physical properties of clouds (see following sections). For the atmospheric correction, the 6S code (Vermote et al., 1997) has been used, which has been extended in that all absorption and reflection coefficients in the atmosphere are modeled for the altitude of each pixel, separately. Consequently, no constant atmospheric influence on radiation is assumed over the large altitudinal gradients present in northern Chile. To simulate atmospheric effects depending on altitude, 30 different altitudinal levels are simulated by the 6S code and polynomial regression models are fitted between altitude and the absorption and reflectance coefficients for the 30 levels. For a full description on the extended version of the 6S code see Curatola Fernández et al. (2015). For the topographic correction, the method originally developed by Minnaert (1941) was applied (Riaño et al., 2003). Therefore, the information from the meta-file shipped with the Landsat data has been used to retrieve illumination and observing geometries at overpass time.

2.4.2. Radiative transfer model to retrieve cloud optical depth and effective radius Cloud optical and micro-physical properties have been retrieved for all pixels covered by low clouds in all available Landsat scenes. Due to the stable inversion over the northern Chilean coast, it can be expected that cloud top temperatures of clouds below the inversion layer differ largely from higher clouds and that clouds below the inversion layer are mostly clouds in the water phase. The latter is important because the interaction of radiation with the cloud highly depends on the cloud phase. Subsequently, low clouds have been discriminated from higher ones applying a simple threshold classification based on the thermal channel information. From inspection of several histograms of scenes acquired in different seasons, the threshold was set to 260 K. Using the specific spectral response function of each Landsat sensor (Landsat 4, 5 and 8), extensive look-up tables for effective radius and cloud optical depth with respect to illumination and observing geometries have been created using the forward version of the radiative transfer model GTR 4.1 (Nakajima and King, 1990). As non-absorbing and absorbing channels, the green (center at approx. 0.56 μm) and the shortwave infrared (SWIR 2, center at approx. 2.2 μm) bands of the different Landsat sensors have been used, respectively. The original approach used bands with similar spectral configuration (center of nonabsorbing and absorbing channels: 0.75 μm and 2.16 μm, Nakajima and King, 1990; Nakajima et al., 1991; Nakajima and Nakajma, 1995). Consequently, we assume that the radiative transfer model is capable of

2.4. Derivation of cloud optical and micro-physical properties The two most important cloud optical and micro-physical properties are optical depth and effective radius. To derive both parameters, an approach has been used which was originally developed for AVHRR data (Nakajima and King, 1990; Nakajima et al., 1991; Nakajima and Nakajma, 1995). In this section, a brief summary of the theoretical background will be given followed by the implementation of the cloud retrieval for Landsat data.

3

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445

L.W. Lehnert, et al.

Fig. 3. Comparison of MODIS (left) and Landsat (right) optical depth (top panel), effective radius (center) and LWP (bottom). The red dot in the maps gives the location of the meteorological station measuring fog water fluxes. The maps show estimates averaged for data acquired since 1986 and 2002 for Landsat and MODIS, respectively. No valid data is available in the white parts of the Landsat maps because these areas lacked sufficiently large clouds in all Landsat overflights to average their properties to the MODIS grid cells. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.) 4

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445

L.W. Lehnert, et al.

3. Results

the Landsat spectral configuration without further changes. Illumination and observing geometries have been calculated for each pixel in each Landsat scene using the Fmask algorithm (Zhu and Woodcock, 2012). Using the inverted version of the radiative transfer model and the look-up tables, cloud effective radius and cloud optical depth for each cloud covered pixel have been estimated. The (LWP) has been calculated from cloud optical depth and effective radius solving equation (3) for LWP:

LWP =

2re τρ 3

3.1. Validation The climatologies of cloud optical depth, effective radius and LWP have been evaluated against the respective climatologies provided by MODIS cloud properties products. The spatial pattern of optical depth was similar between the new Landsat product and MODIS (Fig. 3); in the northern part, a clear gradient was observed from the Pacific Ocean with high optical depth values toward the Andes with low optical depth values. Landsat optical depth was generally slightly above the estimates by MODIS. Mean effective radius values estimated by MODIS were slightly higher and homogeneous over the Pacific Ocean compared to most areas over the continent. In contrast, no such clear spatial pattern was observed for the effective radius in the new Landsat product. However, the range of the mean effective radius was similar with slightly larger radii for Landsat compared to MODIS. Mean LWP derived by MODIS was highest over the Pacific Ocean and in the northern part of the coastal ridge. Over the ocean, a clear west to east gradient from the homogeneous open ocean toward the low values around the coastline was observed for MODIS. The mean estimates for Landsat were more heterogeneous over the ocean and had a pronounced maximum at the coastal ridge. In general, the LWP derived from Landsat was slightly higher compared to the MODIS estimates. Climatologies of LWP from MODIS and Landsat retrievals have been compared within three spatial subsets. The first subset was located over the Pacific Ocean, the second at the coastline and the third in the eastern part of the area covered by the new Landsat product (see map in Fig. 4). We found a good correlation between collocated pixels of MODIS and Landsat LWP values over the Pacific Ocean as shown by the nearly identical regression and 1:1 lines (Pearson ρ = 0.68, pvalue < 0.01, Fig. 4a). The frequency distribution of LWP values in the new Landsat product was slightly flatter compared to the MODIS product. The mean LWP values in both products were nearly identical (MODIS: 73.25 g m−2 , Landsat: 73.13 g m−2 ). In the coastal area, a weak positive correlation between MODIS and Landsat LWP values was observed (Pearson ρ = 0.18, p-value < 0.01, Fig. 4b). In general, Landsat LWP values were higher than those of the MODIS climatology (Mean values of LWP: MODIS: 45.53 g m−2 , Landsat: 73.46 g m−2 ). The histograms show that the distributions of Landsat and MODIS estimates only marginally overlapped. In the third validation region, no significant correlation between collocated Landsat and MODIS LWP values was observed (Pearson ρ = 0.05, p-value = 0.27, Fig. 4c). Here, both MODIS and Landsat LWP values were considerably lower than in both other regions with slightly higher Landsat estimates (Mean values of LWP: MODIS: 12.10 g m−2 , Landsat: 16.17 g m−2 ). The histograms of LWP values of both products revealed similar ranges. A good agreement was observed if monthly LWP values derived from Landsat were compared to fog water fluxes measured in situ (Fig. 5). In general, values in both data sets were high between June and September and low in Austral summer between January and March. A large disagreement between both products was observed for August when local fog water fluxes were highest but only intermediate LWP values were estimated by the new Landsat retrieval. Annual cycles of MODIS LWP values did not follow the annual cycle of the in situ measurements.

(4)

Using all processed Landsat scenes, frequencies of FLS and climatologies of effective radius, cloud optical depth and LWP have been calculated.

2.5. Validation The climatologies retrieved by the new Landsat FLS retrieval were compared to the climatologies of the MODIS cloud properties product. We did not directly compare single scenes because of the long temporal gap between Landsat and MODIS overflights in the area of investigation. For the comparison, the optical depth, effective radius and LWP estimates of each Landsat image were projected onto the MODIS grid. Each Landsat grid element was assigned to the spatially overlapping MODIS one and optical and micro-physical estimates were averaged with all other Landsat pixels located in the field of view of the corresponding MODIS pixel. Afterward, the mean values over time in each of the three variables were calculated for each pixel using all 499 projected Landsat images. Since MODIS will most likely miss clouds featuring small spatial extents, only those pixels were considered for the mean values, which were cloud-covered in more than 90% of the collocated Landsat pixels. This ensured that clouds with small spatial extents and presumably low optical depth, effective radius and LWP could not lead to a systematic bias in the mean values of the Landsat estimates spatio-temporally averaged to the MODIS pixels. From an analysis of orographic fog in the Pan de Azúcar National Park, we expect that the MODIS product will not be able to reproduce the heterogeneous fog occurrences at the coastal ridge (Lehnert et al., 2018). Therefore, we defined three validation areas. The first one was located over the Pacific Ocean where a good correlation between Landsat and MODIS must be retrieved if the new product is feasible, because little spatial homogeneity in clouds over the uniform sea allow the assumption that the higher spatial resolution of the Landsat compared to the MODIS data will not have an effect on the optical and micro-physical estimates. The second and third areas of validation are located over the coastal ridge and to the east of the Pan de Azúcar National Park in the western escarpment of the higher Andes, respectively. Since both regions are characterized by a heterogeneous terrain, no good correlation between MODIS and collocated Landsat pixels can be assumed but we hypothesize that the estimates are in the same range. The latter would show that the new Landsat retrieval is generally able to estimate optical and micro-physical parameters of FLS over land surfaces. In the area of investigation, one meteorological station is measuring fog water fluxes using a cylindrical fog collector (“harp-type”, Falconer and Falconer, 1980) since 2015. The monthly mean values of fog water fluxes for the overpass time of Landsat and MODIS have been calculated to compare the annual cycle of fog water fluxes and LWP derived from the Landsat and MODIS products. This comparison will be used to test if local annual cycles in the fog water fluxes are captured by the higher spatial resolution of Landsat.

3.2. Climatologies of the new Landsat retrieval Using all 499 Landsat scenes acquired between 1986 and 2018, climatologies of relative frequency, optical depth, effective radius and LWP of low clouds were analyzed. On average, 15.12 and 41.58 scenes per year and month were analyzed, respectively (Fig. 2). Highest relative cloud frequencies of 0.8 were detected at the western escarpment of the coastal ridge in the northern part of the Pan de Azúcar National 5

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445

L.W. Lehnert, et al.

Fig. 4. Comparison of MODIS and Landsat LWP for the three areas marked in the map. Solid and dashed red lines are linear regression and 1:1 lines, respectively. The histograms present LWP frequency distributions of the MODIS and Landsat climatologies in the respective area. The red dot in the map gives the location of the meteorological station measuring fog water fluxes. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 5. Annual cycle of mean fog water fluxes at the coastal ridge measured with a cylindrical fog collector between 2015 and 2018 (red lines). The solid and dashed lines represent fog water fluxes at Landsat and MODIS overpass time, respectively. The blue lines show the mean monthly LWP for the pixel of the meteorological station derived by Landsat (solid line) and MODIS (dashed line), respectively. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

6

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445

L.W. Lehnert, et al.

Figure 6. Relative frequency of low clouds derived from over 400 Landsat scenes since 1986. The red dot in the map gives the location of the meteorological station measuring fog water fluxes. The coastline and the border of the Pan de Azúcar National Park are shown to support orientation (black lines). Please note that a smaller spatial extent compared to the maps in Fig. 3 is shown here.

September (Table 1). Homogeneous values of mean cloud optical depth were observed over the Pacific Ocean with values around 9 (Fig. 7). At the coast, the optical depth declined and increased to the east of the coastal ridge, where optical depth locally peaked with values up to 18. In general, the optical depth was heterogeneous over land. To the east of the Pan de Azúcar National Park, optical depth declined, again. Differences in monthly mean effective radii were small with values around 5.32 μm (Table 1) and the spatial pattern of the effective radius was unpronounced (Fig. 8). Over the Pacific Ocean, intermediate radii around 5.6 μm were observed. Mean effective radii of low clouds were highest in the northern part of the Pan de Azúcar National Park with values up to 8 μm. Annual LWP values were highest over the Pacific Ocean followed by coastal ridge (Table 1). Clouds over the Atacama Desert featured lowest water contents. Annual cycles of LWP were pronounced with water rich clouds in austral winter and clouds with low water contents between January and March. LWP peaked over the Pacific Ocean and over the coastal ridge in May and September, respectively. Mean values of LWP ranged between 12 g m−2 and 108 g m−2 (Fig. 9). Intermediate values were estimated for the open Pacific Ocean, while values of LWP were highest for the low clouds to the east of the coastal ridge and in the southern central part of the Pan de Azúcar National Park. Toward the Andes, LWP of low clouds declined.

Park and above the open Pacific Ocean (Fig. 6). Toward the Andes, the lowest relative frequencies of low clouds were observed while those over the coastal area were intermediate. Relative cloud frequencies at the western escarpment of the coastal ridge in the southern part of the Pan de Azúcar National Park were considerably lower compared to the central and northern part of the ridge. Average optical depth ranged between 8.03 in January and 13.13 in

Table 1 Average optical and micro-physical properties of low clouds for the full extension of the retrieval and for the three validation regions shown in the map in Fig. 4. Variable

Region

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

τ

Full a b c Full a b c Full a b c

8.03 8.82 11.60 3.55 5.22 5.21 5.65 5.18 34.33 42.44 57.71 12.50

8.10 10.76 8.49 4.46 4.92 4.96 4.64 5.72 33.61 53.23 27.64 16.65

8.92 11.57 8.90 5.26 4.75 4.81 4.44 5.09 38.53 54.64 30.45 19.35

11.16 15.15 12.41 3.86 5.17 5.31 5.08 5.12 53.86 76.95 56.17 13.59

11.63 19.17 11.63 3.43 5.25 6.22 5.12 4.75 58.21 111.66 53.07 12.75

10.35 13.74 10.84 3.40 4.89 4.83 4.86 5.34 44.20 60.35 46.03 12.82

Variable

Region

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Year

τ

Full a b c Full a b c Full a b c

11.74 13.78 17.07 3.59 5.42 5.22 6.28 4.82 60.56 69.29 98.45 12.04

10.15 15.14 12.34 3.93 5.05 5.41 5.59 6.06 47.69 75.56 66.93 16.36

13.13 14.94 16.58 4.90 5.63 5.64 6.51 5.32 70.83 80.43 103.02 17.94

10.24 14.40 11.47 6.11 5.33 5.78 5.43 5.07 47.38 77.06 53.69 20.50

9.58 12.09 12.04 3.91 5.58 6.29 5.57 5.02 48.68 70.41 63.46 15.03

10.44 12.10 12.09 4.28 5.73 6.44 5.87 6.54 53.55 72.87 60.96 18.91

9.99 13.51 12.59 4.22 5.32 5.57 5.59 4.99 47.64 71.00 63.37 14.92

re

LWP

re

LWP

3.3. Cross sections of cloud frequencies and LWP Cloud frequencies along cross sections over the Atacama Desert clearly differed between MODIS and Landsat data (Fig. 10). For MODIS, frequencies of low clouds immediately dropped to almost zero to the east of the coastline in both profiles. However, if the Atacama Desert was covered by low clouds in MODIS, the LWP of the clouds increased from the coastline and reached a maximum LWP value between 17 to 25 km eastward. Landsat low cloud frequencies reached maximum values immediately after the coastline at the ridge and decreased toward the hyper-arid part of the Atacama Desert. The LWP followed the general pattern of cloud frequencies, but reached its peaks to the east of the maximum of the cloud frequencies after the coastal ridge. Terrain 7

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445

L.W. Lehnert, et al.

Fig. 7. Mean optical depth of low clouds and fog derived from over 400 Landsat scenes since 1986. The red dot in the map gives the location of the meteorological station measuring fog water fluxes. The coastline and the border of the Pan de Azúcar National Park are shown to support orientation (black lines). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

4. Discussion

influenced the low cloud properties in the Landsat product in that windward effects of the first mountain ridges in Fig. 10b led to higher LWP values. In the Landsat satellite scenes, distinguishing between sea spray and clouds was nearly impossible distorting the cross sections. Consequently, LWP and cloud frequencies from Landsat close to the coastline have been removed from the analysis.

The new Landsat FLS retrieval provides climatologies which are in excellent agreement to the existing MODIS cloud properties product if both products are compared over homogeneous sea surfaces. Here, the optical depth, effective radius and the LWP estimates are in the same range and show comparable patterns. In contrast, climatologies of both products over heterogeneous surfaces such as the coastal area of the Fig. 8. Mean effective radius (μm) of low clouds and fog derived from over 400 Landsat scenes since 1986. The red dot in the map gives the location of the meteorological station measuring fog water fluxes. The coastline and the border of the Pan de Azúcar National Park are shown to support orientation (black lines). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

8

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445

L.W. Lehnert, et al.

Fig. 9. Mean LWP (g m−2 ) of low clouds and fog derived from over 400 Landsat scenes since 1986. The red dot in the map gives the location of the meteorological station measuring fog water fluxes. The coastline and the border of the Pan de Azúcar National Park are shown to support orientation (black lines). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

developing in an environment strongly influenced by the terrain are generally smaller in spatial extent and consequently challenge their detection by sensors with coarse spatial resolution. At the coastal region of the Atacama simulations by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF, Skamarock and Klemp, 2008) model demonstrate that topography leads to the development of small-scale orographic fog (Lehnert et al., 2018). In addition, radiation fog develops in valleys in the region (Cereceda et al., 2002). MODIS misses both small scale cloud types due to its coarse spatial resolution because optical and micro-physical properties of clouds appearing at sub-pixel scales are not estimated by the MODIS cloud properties approach even if they are detected in the 250 m cloud mask (Platnick et al., 2003). Here, Landsat is able to detect such small cloud patches as demonstrated by the cloud frequencies in those areas. In addition, we did not observe a general trend to over- or underestimate cloud micro-physical properties in the Landsat retrieval over land surface if compared to the MODIS product. This would indicate that the background reflectance of the surface below the cloud causes higher uncertainties in our new product over Land surface compared to the Pacific Ocean. However, it must be noted that due to the rugged terrain in the area of investigation, it was impossible to compare the results over homogeneous land and sea surfaces. The explanation that differences between products are caused by the spatial resolution of the data, is also supported by the comparison of LWP values of both products to in situ measurements of fog water fluxes. Here, it was demonstrated that pronounced annual cycles of fog water fluxes at the heterogeneous coastal ridge (at the fog oasis) are not captured in the MODIS LWP product. In contrast, the Landsat LWP followed the general pattern. We therefore conclude that the differences between MODIS and Landsat FLS retrievals are primarily caused by the spatial resolution of the sensors which confirms the results of the recent comparison study provided by Lai et al. (2019). However, it must be noted that measurements of fog water fluxes are only available since 2015 and that only a hitherto unknown proportion of low clouds touches the ground and contributes to local fog water fluxes. To estimate

Atacama Desert differ largely. In theory, several reasons may cause these differences. First, the overpass time between MODIS and Landsat differs. Terra MODIS passes the area between 2 and 3 a.m. GMT and 14 and 15 p.m. GMT, Aqua MODIS at about 5 to 6 a.m. GMT and 17 to 18 p.m. GMT. In contrast, Landsat overflights are between 13 and 14 p.m. GMT. Since diurnal cycles of fog water fluxes are unpronounced (Lehnert et al., 2018), it is implausible that differences in overflight time only affect the estimations of cloud micro-physical parameter of clouds over land surface. The second theoretical reason for the observed differences between the new Landsat and the existing MODIS product is that both sensors differ in their spectral configuration. In contrast to Landsat providing two thermal channels at maximum, MODIS records brightness temperature values in 15 different parts of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum. Differences in brightness temperature values of MODIS bands are then used to detect e.g., the cloud phase more precisely than using a simple brightness temperature threshold as in the new Landsat product (Platnick et al., 2003). This may cause that falsely detected water clouds may bias Landsat cloud frequencies and LWP values. Over the Atacama Desert and the adjacent Pacific Ocean, the stable inversion leads to clouds with generally low cloud top altitudes (Bretherton et al., 2004). Therefore, we do not consider the cloud phase detection approach in the area of investigation as a major influencing factor on cloud climatologies in general and on our product of optical and microphysical properties of low clouds in specific. However, if the new cloud retrieval will be applied to data from other parts of the earth, the discrimination between water and ice clouds may be more critical to retrieve valid estimates. The third theoretical reason for the observed differences between the new and the existing product is that spatial resolutions of both products differ. MODIS provides data in 1000 m spatial resolution which is sufficient to detect the large-scale clouds prevailing over homogeneous surfaces such as the Pacific Ocean. In contrast clouds

9

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445

L.W. Lehnert, et al.

Fig. 10. West to east cross sections from the Pacific Ocean toward the Atacama Desert. MODIS and Landsat frequencies of low clouds (blue color) and mean LWP of low clouds (red color) are shown as dashed and solid lines, respectively. The locations of the profile are marked as red lines in the map. Terrain is shown in brown. The reason for the gap in the profiles at the coastline is that clouds could not be separated from sea spray properly. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

fog water fluxes at surface from remotely sensed data, additional investigations are required in future. These must consider vertical cloud profiles (for a first example see Lehnert et al., 2018) to partition the total water amount as described by the LWP into the liquid water content of the different cloud levels. In this study, we provide the first cloud properties product with sufficiently high spatial resolution to capture small scale differences in clouds caused e.g., by a roughed terrain. The product proved to be superior to existing products in areas with extremely high spatial heterogeneity in cloud occurrences and cloud micro-physical properties such as our area of interest, the fog oasis in the Pan de Azúcar National Park in Chile. However, using data from the Landsat program implies several drawbacks compared to data from platforms with short revisit times. The revisit time of Landsat is approx. 16 days. Consequently, the number of scenes which are available for this analysis is considerably lower than if low spatial resolution data such as from geostationary satellites would have been used. Nevertheless, the analysis of the frequencies of available data shows that the product captures seasonal differences because the number of available scenes only marginally differed among months. The differences among years were larger as a consequence of times with lower continuity in the Landsat program. Therefore, the product is not useful to assess any changes in cloud

micro-physics over time. Likewise, the product can not be used to investigate the diurnal cycle of clouds because overflight times of Landsat are almost constant. The new Landsat based climatologies of FLS optical and microphysical properties can be compared to climatologies of existing products developed for other parts of the earth. For instance, Dong et al. (2005) measured properties of low-level clouds for a six years period in the Great Plains, USA. Their mean effective radius with 8.1 – 9.0 μm (depending on the season and day/night time) is slightly lower compared to the one retrieved by the new Landsat product. The optical depth, however, was higher for the clouds over the Great Plains compared to the clouds over the Atacama Desert as retrieved by the new Landsat product (21.4 – 28.5). As a consequence, the LWP values measured by Dong et al. (2005) are higher compared to the new Landsat product. Using a satellite based retrieval to determine optical and microphysical properties of stratus clouds with 2.5° resolution, Zuidema and Hartmann (1995) obtained a mean LWP of 120 g m−2 for their three areas of investigation, the Peruvian, the Namibian and the Californian coast. Consequently, their values are slightly higher than the estimates of the new Landsat fog retrieval. The difference in both products, however, can be explained by the lower spatial resolution which does 10

Remote Sensing of Environment 236 (2020) 111445

L.W. Lehnert, et al.

only allow to retrieve optical and micro-physical properties of large clouds. Consequently, retrievals with coarse resolutions may suffer from overestimation because small and thin clouds are not considered. This clearly demonstrates the need for high resolution cloud retrievals in areas with heterogeneous cloud coverage. For Central Europe, Bendix (2002) presented a fog climatology based on AVHRR data and reported mean values of optical depth, effective radius and LWP which are in the range of our findings. In contrast to our finding that effective radii are constant over the Pacific Ocean and the Atacama Desert, there was a clear negative trend of effective radii from the coastal areas toward the more continental parts in Europe.

radiative properties. J. Clim. 18 (9), 1391–1410. Egli, S., Thies, B., Drönner, J., Cermak, J., Bendix, J., 2016. A 10 year fog and low stratus climatology for Europe based on Meteosat Second generation data. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 143 (702), 530–541. Ernst, S., Lymburner, L., Sixsmith, J., oct, 2018. Implications of pixel quality flags on the observation density of a continental Landsat archive. Remote Sens. 10 (10), 1570. Falconer, R.E., Falconer, P.D., 1980. Determination of cloud water acidity at a mountain observatory in the Adirondack Mountains of New York State. J. Geophys. Res. C Ocean. 85 (C12), 7465–7470. Garreaud, R., Barichivich, J., Christie, D.A., Maldonado, A., 2008. Interannual variability of the coastal fog at Fray Jorge relict forests in semiarid Chile. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosciences 113, G04011. Garreaud, R.D., Molina, A., Farias, M., 2010. Andean uplift, ocean cooling and Atacama hyperaridity: a climate modeling perspective. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 292 (1–2), 39–50. Gultepe, I., Zhou, B., Milbrandt, J., Bott, A., Li, Y., Heymsfield, A., Ferrier, B., Ware, R., Pavolonis, M., Kuhn, T., Gurka, J., Liu, P., Cermak, J., 2015. A review on ice fog measurements and modeling. Atmos. Res. 151, 2–19. Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K.C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., Joseph, D., 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77 (3), 437–471. Lai, R., Teng, S., Yi, B., Letu, H., Min, M., Tang, S., Liu, C., 2019. Comparison of cloud properties from Himawari-8 and FengYun-4A geostationary satellite radiometers with MODIS cloud retrievals. Remote Sens. 11 (14), 1703. Lehnert, L.W., Thies, B., Trachte, K., Achilles, S., Osses, P., Baumann, K., Schmidt, J., Samolov, E., Jung, P., Leinweber, P., Karsten, U., Büdel, B., Bendix, J., 2018. A case study on fog/low stratus occurrence at Las Lomitas, Atacama Desert (Chile) as a water source for biological soil crusts. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 18 (1), 254–269. Levelt, P.F., Van den Oord, G.H.J., Dobber, M.R., Malkki, A., Visser, H., de Vries, J., Stammes, P., Lundell, J.O.V., Saari, H., 2006. The ozone monitoring instrument. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44 (5), 1093–1101. Minnaert, M., 1941. The reciprocity principle in lunar photometry. Astrophys. J. 93, 403. Muenchow, J., Brauning, A., Rodriguez, E.F., von Wehrden, H., 2013. Predictive mapping of species richness and plant species' distributions of a Peruvian fog oasis along an altitudinal gradient. Biotropica 45 (5), 557–566. Muñoz-Schick, M., Pinto, R., Mesa, A., Moreira-Muñoz, A., 2001. Oasis de neblina” en los cerros costeros del sur de Iquique, región de Tarapacá, Chile, durante el evento El Niño 19971998. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 74 (2). Nakajima, T., King, M.D., 1990. Determination of the optical thickness and effective particle radius of clouds from reflected solar radiation measurements. Part I: Theory. J. Atmos. Sci. 47 (15), 1878–1893. Nakajima, T., King, M.D., Spinhirne, J.D., Radke, L.F., 1991. Determination of the optical thickness and effective particle radius of clouds from reflected solar radiation measurements. Part II: marine stratocumulus observations. J. Atmos. Sci. 48 (5), 728–751. Nakajima, T.Y., Nakajma, T., 1995. Wide-area determination of cloud microphysical properties from NOAA AVHRR measurements for FIRE and ASTEX regions. J. Atmos. Sci. 52 (23), 4043–4059. NASA, 2019. Landsat 7 science data users handbook. URL. https://landsat.usgs.gov/landsat-7data-users-handbook. Navarro-Gonzalez, R., 2003. Mars-like soils in the Atacama Desert, Chile, and the dry limit of microbial life. Science 302 (5647), 1018–1021. Platnick, S., King, M., Ackerman, S., Menzel, W., Baum, B., Riedi, J., Frey, R., 2003. The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 41 (2), 459–473. Platnick, S., Meyer, K.G., King, M.D., Wind, G., Amarasinghe, N., Marchant, B., Arnold, G.T., Zhang, Z., Hubanks, P.A., Holz, R.E., Yang, P., Ridgway, W.L., Riedi, J., 2017. The MODIS cloud optical and microphysical products: collection 6 updates and examples from Terra and Aqua. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55 (1), 502–525. Riaño, D., Chuvieco, E., Salas, J., Aguado, I., 2003. Assessment of different topographic corrections in Landsat-TM data for mapping vegetation types. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 41 (5), 1056–1061. Rundel, P.W., Dillon, M.O., Palma, B., 1996. Flora and vegetation of Pan de Azúcar national Park in the Atacama Desert of northern Chile. Gayana. Bot. 53 (2), 295–315. Schemenauer, R.S., Cereceda, P., 1994. A proposed standard fog collector for use in high-elevation regions. J. Appl. Meteorol. 33 (11), 1313–1322. Skamarock, W.C., Klemp, J.B., mar, 2008. A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications. J. Comput. Phys. 227 (7), 3465–3485. Squeo, F.A., Loayza, A.P., Lopez, R.P., Gutierrez, J.R., 2016. Vegetation of bosque Fray Jorge national Park and its surrounding matrix in the coastal desert of north-central Chile. J. Arid Environ. 126, 12–22. Stephens, G.L., Ackerman, S., Smith, E.A., 1984. A shortwave parameterization revised to improve cloud absorption. J. Atmos. Sci. 41 (4), 687–690. Sträter, E., Westbeld, A., Klemm, O., 2010. Pollution in coastal fog at Alto Patache, northern Chile. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 17 (9), 1563–1573. Tachikawa, T., Hato, M., Kaku, M., Iwasaki, A., 2011. Characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). IEEE International, pp. 3657–3660. Thompson, M.V., Palma, B., Knowles, J.T., Holbrook, N.M., 2003. Multi-annual climate in parque nacional Pan de Azúcar, Atacama Desert, Chile. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 76, 235–254. Vermote, E.F., Tanre, D., Deuze, J.L., Herman, M., Morcette, J.J., 1997. Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum, 6S: an overview. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 35 (3), 675–686. Zhang, C., Li, W., Travis, D., 2007. Gaps-fill of slc-off landsat etm plus satellite image using a geostatistical approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 28 (22), 5103–5122. Zhu, Z., Woodcock, C.E., 2012. Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 118, 83–94. Zuidema, P., Hartmann, D.L., 1995. Satellite determination of stratus cloud microphysical properties. J. Clim. 8 (6), 1638–1657.

5. Conclusions The high spatial resolution of the new Landsat product provides new insights into cloud frequencies and mirco-physical parameters which are essential for ecosystems and human societies. For instance, local freshwater fisheries nearby the Pan de Azúcar National Park depend on water collected from fog (Carter et al., 2007). Therefore, knowledge about the frequencies and the water content of the clouds is key, which has so far been missing due to the low spatial resolution of existing products which apparently do not reliably detect clouds in heterogeneous areas and consequently do not consider their optical and micro-physical properties. In addition, clouds generally feed back with climate. The usage of the coarse resolution cloud products will lead to a systematic underestimation of the effect of clouds on water and energy fluxes. Therefore, cloud products with higher spatial resolutions are urgently required in future. Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge financial support from the German Science Foundation (DFG) priority research program SPP-1803 “EarthShape: Earth Surface Shaping by Biota” (project CRUSTWEATHERING: BE1780/44-1). We are also grateful to the Chilean National Park Service (CONAF) for providing access to the sample locations and on-site support of our research. References Andersen, H., Cermak, J., 2018. First fully diurnal fog and low cloud satellite detection reveals life cycle in the Namib. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11 (10), 5461–5470. Bendix, J., 2002. A satellite-based climatology of fog and low-level stratus in Germany and adjacent areas. Atmos. Res. 64 (1–4), 3–18. Borthagaray, A.I., Fuentes, M.A., Marquet, P.A., 2010. Vegetation pattern formation in a fogdependent ecosystem. J. Theor. Biol. 265 (1), 18–26. Bretherton, C.S., Uttal, T., Fairall, C.W., Yuter, S.E., Weller, R.A., Baumgardner, D., Comstock, K., Wood, R., Raga, G.B., 2004. The EPIC 2001 stratocumulus study. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 85 (7), 967–978. Carter, V., Schemenauer, R.S., Osses, P., Streeter, H., 2007. The Atacama Desert fog collection project at falda verde, Chile. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Fog, Fog Collection and Dew. La Serena, Chile. pp. 22–27. Cereceda, P., Larrain, H., Osses, P., Farías, A., Egaña, I., 2008. The spatial and temporal variability of fog and its relation to fog oases in the Atacama Desert, Chile. Atmos. Res. 87 (3–4), 312–323. Cereceda, P., Osses, P., Larrain, H., Farias, M., Lagos, M., Pinto, R., Schemenauer, R.S., 2002. Advective, orographic and radiation fog in the Tarapaca region, Chile. Atmos. Res. 64 (1–4) PII S0169–8095(02)00097–2. Cermak, J., Bendix, J., 2008. A novel approach to fog/low stratus detection using Meteosat 8 data. Atmos. Res. 87, 279–292. Cermak, J., Eastman, R.M., Bendix, J., Warren, S.G., 2009. European climatology of fog and low stratus based on geostationary satellite observations. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 135 (645), 2125–2130. Curatola Fernández, G.F., Obermeier, W.A., Gerique, A., Sandoval, M.F.L., Lehnert, L.W., Thies, B., Bendix, J., 2015. Land cover change in the Andes of southern Ecuador - patterns and drivers. Remote Sens. 7 (3), 2509–2542. Dobber, M., Dirksen, R., Levelt, P., Van den Oord, G.H.J., Voors, R., Kleipool, Q., Jaross, G., Kowalewski, M., Hilsenrath, E., Leppelmeier, G., de Vries, J., Dierssen, W., Rozemeijer, N., 2006. Ozone monitoring instrument calibration. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44 (5), 1209–1238. Dong, X., Minnis, P., Xi, B., 2005. A climatology of midlatitude continental clouds from the ARM SGP central facility: Part I: low-level cloud macrophysical, microphysical, and

11