Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity

Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal stru...

707KB Sizes 2 Downloads 53 Views

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

REVIEW GLUCOCORTICOID REGULATION OF BRAIN-DERIVED NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR: RELEVANCE TO HIPPOCAMPAL STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL PLASTICITY D. SURI AND V. A. VAIDYA *

tion of potential therapeutic targets for disorders associated with the dysfunction of stress hormone pathways. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Steroid hormones and BDNF. Ó 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai 400005, India

Abstract—Glucocorticoids serve as key stress response hormones that facilitate stress coping. However, sustained glucocorticoid exposure is associated with adverse consequences on the brain, in particular within the hippocampus. Chronic glucocorticoid exposure evokes neuronal cell damage and dendritic atrophy, reduces hippocampal neurogenesis and impairs synaptic plasticity. Glucocorticoids also alter expression and signaling of the neurotrophin, brainderived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Since BDNF is known to promote neuroplasticity, enhance cell survival, increase hippocampal neurogenesis and cellular excitability, it has been hypothesized that specific adverse effects of glucocorticoids may be mediated by attenuating BDNF expression and signaling. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of literature examining the influence of glucocorticoids on BDNF, and to address whether specific effects of glucocorticoids arise through perturbation of BDNF signaling. We integrate evidence of glucocorticoid regulation of BDNF at multiple levels, spanning from the well-documented glucocorticoid-induced changes in BDNF mRNA to studies examining alterations in BDNF receptormediated signaling. Further, we delineate potential lines of future investigation to address hitherto unexplored aspects of the influence of glucocorticoids on BDNF. Finally, we discuss the current understanding of the contribution of BDNF to the modulation of structural and functional plasticity by glucocorticoids, in particular in the context of the hippocampus. Understanding the mechanistic crosstalk between glucocorticoids and BDNF holds promise for the identifica-

Key words: hormone, glucocorticoid receptor, neurotrophin, tropomyosin-related kinase B, mitogen-activated protein kinase, stress. Contents Introduction 00 Glucocorticoids 00 BDNF 00 Regulation of BDNF 00 Glucocorticoid regulation of BDNF expression 00 Influence of glucocorticoids on Bdnf transcription 00 Influence of glucocorticoids on exon-specific Bdnf transcript variants 00 Influence of glucocorticoids on Bdnf mRNA stability 00 Influence of glucocorticoids on BDNF translation, processing, trafficking and secretion 00 Stress regulation of BDNF 00 Glucocorticoid receptors and BDNF 00 Glucocorticoid regulation of BDNF signaling 00 Glucocorticoids and BDNF crosstalk: implications for hippocampal structural and functional plasticity 00 GC and BDNF interactions in the context of cell survival and structural plasticity 00 GC and BDNF interaction in the context of synaptic plasticity and hippocampal-dependent behavior 00 Conclusions 00 References 00

*Corresponding author. Tel: +91-22-22782608; fax: +91-2222804610. E-mail address: [email protected] (V. A. Vaidya). Abbreviations: ADX, adrenalectomy; AP-1, activator protein-1; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; CREB, cyclic AMP response element-binding protein; CRH, corticotrophin-releasing hormone; DG, dentate gyrus; EPSP, excitatory postsynaptic potential; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GCs, glucocorticoids; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; GREs, glucocorticoid response elements; HPA, hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenal; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; LTP, long-term potentiation; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MKP-1, MAP kinase phosphatase-1; MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; MR, mineralocorticoid receptor; NF-jB, nuclear factor-jB; p75NTR, p75 neurotrophin receptor; PC, prohormone convertases; PI3-Akt, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-Akt; PLCc, phospholipase C-c; PVN, paraventricular nucleus; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator; TrkB, tropomyosin-related kinase B.

INTRODUCTION Steroid hormones serve as a major stress response pathway, evoking widespread responses across the body including the brain, thus priming a fight or flight response (reviewed in Joe¨ls, 2011). Of the steroid hormones, glucocorticoids (GCs) that are secreted by the adrenal cortex in response to physical and psychological stressors, mediate pleiotrophic effects on both the periphery and the central nervous system, evoking diverse changes from the modulation of glucose uptake to influencing cognitive performance (reviewed in

0306-4522/12 $36.00 Ó 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065 1

2

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

Sapolsky et al., 2000). While in the short term these essential hormones play a critical role in promoting stress coping (reviewed in de Kloet, 2008), prolonged elevation of GCs as observed following chronic stress, hypothalamo–pituitary dysregulation, long-term clinical administration, or in Cushing’s syndrome, is associated with several maladaptive changes (reviewed in McEwen, 2008). Chronically elevated GCs have an adverse impact on structural and functional plasticity in limbic brain regions, such as the hippocampus, including spine loss and dendritic atrophy (Liston and Gan, 2011; reviewed in Fuchs et al., 2001), neuronal cell death (Sapolsky et al., 1990; Haynes et al., 2004), impaired long-term potentiation (LTP) (Pavlides et al., 1993, 1996) and decreased neurogenesis (reviewed in Schoenfeld and Gould, 2012). While various studies (Cameron and Gould, 1994; Sousa et al., 2000; Lee et al., 2012) have examined the effects of GCs on plasticity in the brain, a clear mechanistic understanding of the underlying molecular mediators is currently lacking. Growth factors and neurotrophins are key regulators of neuronal plasticity (reviewed in Poo, 2001). In particular, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is reported to strongly influence synaptogenesis and spine formation (reviewed in Yoshii and Constantine-Paton, 2010), neuronal survival (reviewed in Lipsky and Marini, 2007), LTP and neuronal excitability (reviewed in Minichiello, 2009), as well as adult hippocampal neurogenesis (reviewed in Schmidt and Duman, 2007). Given the opposing effects of GCs and BDNF on many of the same measures of structural plasticity and cellular excitability, it has been hypothesized that specific adverse effects of GCs may involve attenuation of BDNF expression or signaling (reviewed in Smith, 1996). While such a link has been speculated upon in the literature (reviewed in Smith, 1996; Kunugi et al., 2010), thus far there is limited evidence that indicates a role for altered BDNF function in contributing to the damaging effects of GCs. In this regard it is important to understand the regulation of BDNF and its signaling pathway by GCs. For the purpose of our review, we explore the relationship between GCs and the BDNF pathway, with a view to addressing whether alterations in BDNF signaling may serve to mediate effects of GCs, in particular within the hippocampus.

GLUCOCORTICOIDS Exposure to stress activates the hypothalamo– pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis. Physiological and psychological stressors strongly activate the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus, via activatory inputs from brain stem nuclei and the amygdala resulting in the release of corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) (reviewed in Jankord and Herman, 2008). CRH circulating through the hypophyseal portal system, acts on the pituitary, inducing the release of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) which promotes GC release from the adrenal cortex (reviewed in Herman and Cullinan, 1997). GCs are adrenal cortex-derived

steroid hormones, predominant among which are cortisol in humans and corticosterone in rodents. Classically, GCs mediate their responses via the type I mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and the type II glucocorticoid receptor (GR) (reviewed in De Kloet et al., 2005). MR has a high affinity for corticosterone, as well as aldosterone, whereas GR has a higher affinity for dexamethasone and an approximately 10-fold lower affinity than MR for corticosterone (Reul and de Kloet, 1985). On ligand binding, GC receptors undergo conformational changes and translocate to the nucleus, where they bind to their consensus sequences, the glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) as homo(Beato, 1989) or hetero-dimers (Trapp et al., 1994), thus triggering transcription of target genes (reviewed in Zanchi et al., 2010). GC receptors can also bind negative GREs, thus repressing the transcription of genes primarily by two mechanisms, namely by competition for binding with a transcription factor at an overlapping binding site, or by interaction with adjacent transcription factors to impede their action (reviewed in Dostert and Heinzel, 2004). Stimulation of GC receptors has been linked to discrete physiological outcomes, suggesting that the specific receptor recruited, or the stoichiometry of GC receptors stimulated, may evoke distinct functional consequences (reviewed in De Kloet and Derijk, 2004). The differing affinity of GC receptors, as well as the tissue-specific stoichiometric expression of the GR and MRs, is hypothesized to endow neuronal cells with a wide dynamic range of potential biochemical outcomes mediated through the regulation of different GC-responsive target genes (reviewed in De Kloet and Derijk, 2004). While the classical view of GC action is through relatively slow-onset genomic effects, it is important to note that specific effects of GCs, including their effects on the hypothalamic release of CRH (reviewed in Dallman, 2005), rapid effects on behavior (Oitzl and de Kloet, 1992; Kruk et al., 2004) and cellular excitability (Karst et al., 2005), often occur across a time frame of a few seconds or minutes indicating likely nongenomic action. The fast actions of GCs could involve a role for cytoplasmic MR and GR monomer interactions with cytoplasmic proteins (reviewed in Dostert and Heinzel, 2004), or could be through membrane GC receptors (reviewed in Losel and Wehling, 2003). Studies have indicated the presence of plasma membrane-associated putative GC receptors that on binding the ligand influence a pertussis toxin (PTX)sensitive G-protein-coupled pathway linked to protein kinase C (PKC) (reviewed in Losel and Wehling, 2003). GCs act to aid the body in coping with the demands imposed by stress exposure, mobilizing energy stores, and suppressing non-vital body functions such as inflammatory responses and reproduction (reviewed in Sapolsky et al., 2000). In addition, GCs also perform the crucial task of negative feedback regulation of the HPA axis, thus preventing the uncontrolled activation of the stress response. Feedback regulation occurs not only at the level of the hypothalamus and the pituitary, but also via multiple other cortical and subcortical structures (reviewed in Herman et al., 2003). In particular, the

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

3

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

hippocampus is one of the crucial sites in the brain implicated in mediating feedback control of the HPA axis (reviewed in Herman et al., 2003). While the high-affinity MR is largely expressed in limbic areas like the hippocampus, lateral septum and the amygdala, the low-affinity GR is more ubiquitously present (Reul and de Kloet, 1985). MR is generally saturated under basal GC levels (Arriza et al., 1988), whereas under conditions of stress-induced elevation of GCs or at circadian peaks the low-affinity GR receptor is recruited (Kitchener et al., 2004) and plays a crucial role in many of the stress-associated neurological effects observed. The hippocampus harbors a high density of both the MR and GR receptors, which on binding GCs repress the hypothalamic release of CRH via multi-synaptic inputs (Radley and Sawchenko, 2011). Under conditions of prolonged stress, the ensuing persistent elevation of GCs, often in conjugation with excitatory amino acids, can mediate a variety of adverse structural and cellular changes including dendritic atrophy and neuronal damage in the hippocampus (Sapolsky et al., 1990; Haynes et al., 2004, reviewed in Fuchs et al., 2001), which may potentially compromise hippocampal function. Prolonged elevation of GC levels evokes extensive cellular damage and loss in hippocampal CA subfields, including cell layer irregularity, soma shrinkage/ condensation, nuclear pyknosis and dendritic atrophy of CA3 pyramidal neurons (Sapolsky et al., 1990; Haynes et al., 2004). Strikingly, hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) granule cell neurons do not appear to be as susceptible to the damaging effects of sustained GC exposure (Uno et al., 1989; Sapolsky et al., 1990). However, loss of circulating GCs by adrenalectomy (ADX) evokes extensive cell death of the mature granule cell neurons in the DG (Sloviter et al., 1989; Cameron and Gould, 1994), but is known to enhance proliferation of progenitors within the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the DG subfield (Cameron and Gould, 1994). Further, chronic GC exposure negatively regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis by reducing the proliferative rate of hippocampal progenitors (Cameron and Gould, 1994). The effects of GCs on cell proliferation, dendritic architecture and neuronal survival vary across distinct hippocampal cellular populations. GCs by disrupting hippocampal glucose utilization (Virgin et al., 1991) are also hypothesized to render neurons vulnerable to metabolic (Lawrence and Sapolsky, 1994) and excitotoxic (Roy and Sapolsky, 2003) insults. In addition, GCs mediate robust effects on hippocampal cellular excitability with a bimodal effect of GCs on LTP, with both ADX and exposure to high GC levels impairing hippocampal LTP (Pavlides et al., 1993). Persistently elevated GC levels also lower the expression of GRs in the hippocampus (Kitchener et al., 2004), thus further impairing feedback response and resulting in a selfsustaining cycle of HPA axis dysregulation. Several previous reviews (Joe¨ls, 2008; Conrad, 2008) have focused on the consequences of short- and long-term GC administration on neuronal damage, dendritic atrophy and functional plasticity, primarily within limbic neurocircuitry and in the context of chronic stress. For

the purposes of this review we have chosen to restrict ourselves to examining the literature that links GCs to the regulation of the neurotrophin BDNF, and its potential contribution to the effects of GCs.

BDNF BDNF is the most abundantly expressed member of the nerve growth factor family, referred to as the neurotrophins. Neurotrophins are known to exert a powerful influence on development (reviewed in Bernd, 2008), survival (reviewed in Lipsky and Marini, 2007) and plasticity (Causing et al., 1997; Bergami et al., 2008) of neurons within the immature and adult nervous system. The Bdnf gene has a complex structure with multiple exons, each with their individual promoters, which are alternatively spliced to generate exon-specific Bdnf transcript variants with one common Bdnf coding exon (Aid et al., 2007). The Bdnf gene has been characterized in the mouse, rat and human (Liu et al., 2005; Aid et al., 2007). In the rat, the Bdnf gene through the alternate splicing of eight distinct non-coding 50 exons (I–VIII) to a common 30 exon (IX) can generate multiple exon-specific Bdnf transcripts. Each 50 untranslated exon has a unique promoter, while the common 30 exon (IX) is responsible for coding the mature BDNF protein. BDNF mediates its effects by binding to its receptor tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB), and through the activation of signaling cascades, predominant among which are Ras-Raf-MEK (MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase)/ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase)) kinase, phospholipase C-c (PLCc) and the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase–Akt (v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog) (PI3–Akt) pathways (Chao, 2003; Reichardt, 2006). The activation of these signaling pathways culminates in target protein phosphorylation, and thus functional modulation of downstream molecules involved in vesicular mobility, glutamatergic neurotransmission and neurotransmitter release (reviewed in Yoshii and Constantine-Paton, 2010). BDNF can also interact with the low-affinity p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) (Fayard et al., 2005), which is a member of the tumor necrosis receptor family. Several different pathways including the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling cascade, nuclear factor-jB (NF-jB) activation, ceramide signaling and Rho family GTPase activation lie downstream of ligand-mediated activation of p75NTR (reviewed in Roux and Barker, 2002; Reichardt, 2006). Interestingly, there are several points for crosstalk between the TrkB and p75NTR cascades (Bibel et al., 1999), and often neurotrophin-mediated effects through these two pathways exert opposing actions (reviewed in Miller and Kaplan, 2001). For example, TrkB receptor activation almost always promotes neuronal survival and differentiation (review Barnabe´-Heider and Miller, 2003), while the engagement of p75NTR frequently, but not invariably, promotes apoptosis (Lee et al., 2001; Teng et al., 2005). In the hippocampus in particular, BDNF is robustly expressed and released in response to activity and plays an important role in activity-dependent sculpting

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

4

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

and refinement of synapses, and in the enhancement of synapse number and density (reviewed in Kuczewski et al., 2009). Cellular excitability itself is potentiated by BDNF through the enhancement of presynaptic vesicle release (Jovanovic et al., 2000) and postsynaptic glutamatergic currents (Kovalchuk et al., 2002). A form of cellular plasticity strongly influenced by BDNF signaling is adult hippocampal neurogenesis, where BDNF acts to promote the birth (Lee et al., 2002; Scharfman et al., 2005), survival (Sairanen et al., 2005) and maturation (Chan et al., 2008; Bergami et al., 2008) of new neurons in the hippocampal neurogenic niche. BDNF expression is modulated by stress (Tsankova et al., 2006; Nair et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2010), and has been implicated in the pathophysiology of mood disorders (reviewed in Duman and Monteggia, 2006), and in the mechanism of action of antidepressant agents (Li et al., 2008). Studies have demonstrated that direct BDNF infusion into the hippocampus enhances cellular excitability, and when accompanied by a weak stimulus induces robust LTP (Figurov et al., 1996), widely considered to be the cellular correlate of memory. BDNF effects on LTP are correlated with an improvement in performance on hippocampal-dependent learning tasks (Cirulli et al., 2004). Conversely, a loss of BDNF signaling in the hippocampus results in dampened LTP, as well as impairments in cognitive function (Minichiello et al., 1999). BDNF plays a pivotal role in the modulation of structural and synaptic plasticity (reviewed in Yoshii and Constantine-Paton, 2010), as well as mood (Duman and Monteggia, 2006) and memory (reviewed in Tyler et al., 2002), and its expression is strongly regulated by diverse external stimuli that are known to influence these parameters (reviewed in Tardito et al., 2006).

REGULATION OF BDNF The regulation of BDNF expression and signaling occurs at multiple levels (Fig. 1), from transcriptional control of the distinct exon-specific Bdnf transcripts to sortilindependent modulation of BDNF trafficking. The complex gene structure of Bdnf allows exon-specific Bdnf promoters to be differentially recruited by distinct transcription factors both under basal conditions, and in response to stimuli (Timmusk et al., 1995; Tao et al., 2002; Dias et al., 2003). While the Bdnf gene has been relatively well characterized, an in-depth analysis of the distinct transcription factors that combinatorially control the regulation of the multiple Bdnf transcript variants is still limited. The best understanding currently exists for the role of cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) (Tao et al., 1998), upstream stimulatory factors, calcium response factors (Shieh et al., 1998; Tao et al., 2002) and the transcriptional repressor methylCpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) (Chen et al., 2003), in the regulation of the expression of specific Bdnf transcript variants. In addition to the usage of multiple promoters, the Bdnf gene also has two alternate polyadenylation sites (Timmusk et al., 1993), which further add to the diversity of Bdnf transcripts through the

formation of either the long or short 30 UTR form of the specific Bdnf transcript. It has been hypothesized that the complex architecture of the Bdnf gene may endow neuronal cells with the ability to differentially target select Bdnf transcripts to specific cellular locations (Chiaruttini et al., 2008; Baj et al., 2012), and modulate their stimulus-responsivity and translatability (Lauterborn et al., 1996; Tao et al., 2002). The evidence of RNAbinding proteins that contribute to the differential localization of specific Bdnf mRNA variants is currently limited, with a role thus far indicated for the RNA-binding protein translin in dendritic trafficking of Bdnf transcripts (Chiaruttini et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2011). Transcriptional control of Bdnf expression through the recruitment of distinct promoters and usage of different polyadenylation sites could influence Bdnf mRNA stability, translatability and the kinetics of stimuli-responsivity, thus providing the possibility of powerful control in the modulation of the expression of this key neurotrophin. In addition to the transcriptional regulation of Bdnf expression, regulation of BDNF can also occur at the level of BDNF synthesis, trafficking, secretion and processing (Fig. 1). Bdnf transcripts with the long versus short 30 UTRs differentially influence the translatability and stability of Bdnf mRNA (Fukuchi and Tsuda, 2010). Short 30 UTR Bdnf transcripts are linked to basal BDNF synthesis and the long 30 UTR Bdnf mRNAs have been associated with rapid, activity-responsive translation (Lau et al., 2010) which can be spatially restricted, for example to active dendrites (An et al., 2008; Oe and Yoneda, 2010). BDNF is a secreted protein, which is synthesized as pro-BDNF and then undergoes further proteolytic processing to form mature BDNF (Seidah et al., 1996; Lu, 2003). Pro-BDNF trafficking occurs primarily through the regulated secretory pathway, which can be strongly influenced by signaling cascades (Goodman et al., 1996; Kru¨ttgen et al., 1998; reviewed in Thomas and Davies, 2005). The trafficking of proBDNF into the regulated secretory pathway undergoe modulation by the intracellular chaperone sortilin and by carboxypeptidase E (Chen et al., 2005). Neuronal cells are capable of secretion of both processed mature BDNF, as well as the precursor pro-BDNF (Yang et al., 2009). Conversion of pro-BDNF to BDNF is mediated via furin and prohormone convertases (PC) within cells (Seidah et al., 1996), and extracellularly through the plasmin–tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) system (Lee et al., 2001) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (Lee et al., 2001; Hwang et al., 2005). Pro-BDNF can bind to p75NTR (Fayard et al., 2005) and induce signaling (reviewed in Roux and Barker, 2002; Reichardt, 2006). Regulation at the level of intracellular and extracellular proteolytic processing of BDNF could provide for powerful control of the consequences of BDNF signaling on neuronal survival and cellular excitability (reviewed in Chao and Bothwell, 2002). Regulation of BDNF signaling could also occur through a modulation of the expression and alternate splicing, translation and trafficking of the TrkB and p75NTRs, and through the regulation of their downstream signaling cascades and interactions with intracellular adaptor

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

5

Fig. 1. The regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) synthesis, processing, trafficking, secretion and signaling by glucocorticoids (GCs). The regulation of BDNF synthesis and function by GC can occur at multiple levels, from transcriptional control of the distinct exon-specfic Bdnf transcripts to signaling at the postsynaptic neuron. (1) Bdnf transcription can be modulated by GCs either by direct binding to putative glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) present on the promoter regions or by interfering with the activity of other transcription factors reported to contribute to Bdnf transcription, such as the activator protein-1 (AP-1) complex and CREB. (2) In addition to the transcriptional regulation of Bdnf, glucocorticoids can also potentially alter the translation of the Bdnf gene by modulating the activity of the translational machinery. (3) BDNF is a secreted protein, which is synthesized as pro-BDNF and then undergoes proteolytic processing to form the mature BDNF protein. Conversion of pro-BDNF to mature BDNF is mediated via multiple intracellular and extracellular proteases including furin and prohormone convertases (PC) within cells, and the plasmin–tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) system and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) extracellularly. GCs can modulate the levels or the activity of the intracellular and extracellular proteases and thus regulate the levels of available mature BDNF. (4) Mature BDNF binds to intracellular chaperones which allow sorting of BDNF to regulated secretory pathway or the constitutive pathway. Pro and mature-BDNF are packaged and trafficked either to the dendrites or axons. (5) BDNF is released in response to activity and post-synaptically interacts with its cognate receptor tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB) or the low-affinity receptor p75NTR to activate distinct signaling cascades. (6) BDNF binding to TrkB, activates the MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway, phospholipase C-c (PLCc) and the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3-kinase) pathways. The activation of these signaling pathways culminates in functional modulation of downstream target molecules involved in synaptic plasticity, neuronal survival and cellular excitability. GCs potentially modulate the activity of these signaling pathways at multiple levels. GCs prevent TrkB interactions with specific adaptor proteins such as Shp2 thus impairing activation of the MAP kinase pathway. Further, GCs promote the transcription of MAP kinase inhibitor protein MAP kinase phosphatase 1 (MKP 1) which serves to terminate MAP kinase signaling. In addition, GCs also impair TrkB and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) interaction, thus attenuating PLCc pathway activation. Given is a symbolic representation of mature BDNF (mBDNF), pro BDNF, GR, GC, p75 NTR and TrkB. Red circles denote sites in the BDNF synthesis, processing or signaling pathway which are potential direct targets for the modulatory effects of GCs on the BDNF pathway. Red question marks denote putative targets for GC modulation of the BDNF pathway based on indirect evidence of reported effects of GCs in other systems.

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

6

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

proteins (Fig. 1). TrkB exists as both the catalytic fulllength variant (TrkB.FL) and the alternatively spliced truncated forms (TrkB.T1 and T2) (Fryer et al., 1996; Strohmaier et al., 1996), which lack the tyrosine kinase domain, and have been suggested to exert a dominant negative role (Eide et al., 1996). Evidence also indicates that truncated TrkB forms may signal through distinct pathways, for example by the modulation of inositol1,4,5-trisphosphate-dependent calcium release, and through extracellular or intramembrane interactions with p75NTR (Baxter et al., 1997; Rose et al., 2003; Michaelsen et al., 2010). Modulation of the balance of full-length versus truncated TrkB expression could evoke distinct biochemical and functional outcomes of BDNF signaling (Sherrard et al., 2009; Vidaurre et al., 2012). The regulation of BDNF occurs both at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels providing multiple sites of action through which GCs may modulate BDNF expression and signaling (Fig. 1).

GLUCOCORTICOID REGULATION OF BDNF EXPRESSION Influence of glucocorticoids on Bdnf transcription Several studies (Barbany and Persson, 1992; Smith et al., 1995b; Schaaf et al., 1997, 1998; Hansson et al., 2000, 2006; Vellucci et al., 2001) have examined the consequences of systemic administration with the GCs corticosterone and dexamethasone, on the expression of Bdnf mRNA within multiple brain regions, predominantly focusing on the hippocampus. Corticosterone has been shown to decrease the levels of Bdnf mRNA in the hippocampal DG subfield following either acute (2–8 h) (Barbany and Persson, 1992; Smith et al., 1995b; Schaaf et al., 1997, 1998; Hansson et al., 2000, 2006; Vellucci et al., 2001) or chronic (7 days) (Smith et al., 1995b) administration. Decreased Bdnf mRNA levels within the hippocampal subfields following acute corticosterone treatment are observed fairly rapidly (Schaaf et al., 1998), and are accompanied by a decrease in hippocampal BDNF protein levels (Schaaf et al., 1998). Decreased Bdnf mRNA levels have also been noted following treatment with dexamethasone (21 days) in the frontal cortex and hippocampus (Dwivedi et al., 2006). While most studies have shown a decline in hippocampal Bdnf mRNA expression following GC administration (Barbany and Persson, 1992; Smith et al., 1995b; Schaaf et al., 1997, 1998; Hansson et al., 2000, 2006; Vellucci et al., 2001), results differ in the hippocampal subfields in which changes in Bdnf mRNA were noted. These discrepancies may be a consequence of differences in the animal models used, time points examined or in corticosterone dose. Further, a history of prior GC exposure may significantly alter responses to future GC exposure, as has been suggested by reports of a downregulation of cortical Bdnf mRNA expression on acute exposure to corticosterone 14 days following chronic corticosterone treatment (Gourley et al., 2009). Strikingly, the developmental time-point examined appears to dramatically influence the nature of the GC regulation of Bdnf, with no change in hippocampal Bdnf expression

following early postnatal treatment (Roskoden et al., 2004) and a significant decline in response to adult-onset treatment (Barbany and Persson, 1992; Smith et al., 1995b; Schaaf et al., 1997, 1998; Hansson et al., 2000, 2006; Vellucci et al., 2001; Dwivedi et al., 2006). However, most studies have largely looked at the immediate consequences of GC treatment on Bdnf expression, and have not addressed whether GC exposure may evoke slow-emerging but persistent changes in Bdnf expression. Intriguingly, a few studies have demonstrated that a history of prenatal dexamethasone exposure induced a decline in cortical and hippocampal basal Bdnf mRNA in juvenile animals (Nagano et al., 2012), and altered the stimulus-evoked regulation of Bdnf exon IV expression (Hossain et al., 2008). This raises the interesting possibility that the effects of early GC treatment may only manifest at later ages. The in vivo repressive effects of GCs on Bdnf expression have also been corroborated in studies using in vitro models (Kino et al., 2010). Dexamethasone has been shown to suppress Bdnf mRNA and protein expression in rat cortical neuronal cells, whereas the endogenous glucocorticoid corticosterone showed a biphasic effect (Kino et al., 2010). In contrast to the emerging consensus from several reports that GCs reduce Bdnf mRNA expression in both cortical (Dwivedi et al., 2006; Gourley et al., 2009) and hippocampal brain regions (Barbany and Persson, 1992; Smith et al., 1995b; Schaaf et al., 1997, 1998; Hansson et al., 2000, 2006; Vellucci et al., 2001), the effects of ADX have been far less consistent (Barbany and Persson, 1992, 1993; Chao and McEwen, 1994; Smith et al., 1995b; Lauterborn et al., 1998). Specific studies have shown a significant downregulation of cortical and hippocampal Bdnf expression following ADX (Barbany and Persson, 1992, 1993) which can be rescued by dexamethasone treatment (Barbany and Persson, 1992). However, there are contradictory studies that indicate no change in Bdnf expression in these brain regions (Lauterborn et al., 1995; Smith et al., 1995b; Vaidya et al., 1997), and a few reports that indicate an opposing upregulation of BDNF mRNA following ADX (Chao and McEwen, 1994; Lauterborn et al., 1998). These discrepancies are difficult to resolve since most studies have examined Bdnf expression using in situ hybridization or real-time PCR, similar time-points after ADX, and predominantly in rat models. However, all the reports that indicate ADX-evoked changes in hippocampal basal Bdnf mRNA levels report only relatively small hippocampal subfield-specific effects (Chao and McEwen, 1994; Lauterborn et al., 1998), hinting at the possibility that the GCs may not exert a strong tonic control on basal Bdnf mRNA expression. It is possible that the effects of ADX may only be unmasked in the context of stimulus-responsive Bdnf mRNA regulation. ADX animals exhibit a robust potentiation of the activity-mediated Bdnf mRNA upregulation in the hippocampus in paroxysmal after discharge or hilus lesion models (Lauterborn et al., 1995, 1998). In contrast, ADX attenuates the effects of kainate treatment on Bdnf mRNA expression (Barbany and Persson, 1992). In

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

summary, the current literature provides support for the notion that the absence of circulating GCs may not exert a strong effect on basal Bdnf expression, but may alter the stimulus-responsivity of Bdnf promoters. Further, elevated circulating GCs appear to predominantly cause a robust downregulation of Bdnf transcript levels in cortical and hippocampal brain regions (Fig. 1(1)). Influence of glucocorticoids on exon-specific Bdnf transcript variants Though a detailed mechanistic understanding of how GCs influence specific Bdnf promoters is missing, several studies have demonstrated basal and stimulus-evoked alterations in Bdnf exon II and VI-containing transcripts by GCs (Dwivedi et al., 2006; Hansson et al., 2006). It is noteworthy that the Bdnf VI promoter contains a putative GRE (Fig. 1(1)) (Benraiss et al., 2001), which could allow for the possibility of direct genomic effects of GCs on Bdnf transcription through this specific Bdnf promoter. However, thus far no experiments have systematically addressed the role of GR or MR-mediated regulation of the Bdnf VI promoter GRE, and its contribution to basal or GC-mediated regulation of Bdnf expression. In addition to possible direct GRE-mediated transcriptional effects, GCs could also influence Bdnf expression by modulation of the activity of other transcription factors reported to contribute to Bdnf mRNA regulation, such as the activator protein-1 (AP-1) complex and CREB (reviewed in Kassel and Herrlich, 2007). Ligand bound GR has been suggested to repress AP-1-mediated transcriptional activation by c-Jun-containing AP-1 complexes (Unlap and Jope, 1994; Diefenbacher et al., 2008). Given that the Bdnf gene has a high density of AP-1-binding sites (Hayes et al., 1997), this raises the possibility that GC exposure may serve to repress AP-1-mediated increases in Bdnf expression. It has also been reported that GR and CREB show mutual interference of transcriptional activity (Stauber et al., 1992). Since CREB has been demonstrated to be an important regulator of Bdnf expression primarily via Bdnf promoters I and IV (Shieh et al., 1998; Tao et al., 1998), it is possible to speculate that elevated GC levels could influence the CREBmediated transcriptional regulation of Bdnf expression (Fig. 1(1)). These ideas are still relatively nascent, and require experimental evidence to demonstrate their validity. Such experiments are important because they could provide a mechanistic understanding of how GC perturbations influence the regulation of important target genes, including Bdnf, through interaction with key plasticity-associated transcription factors/complexes like CREB and AP-1. Influence of glucocorticoids on Bdnf mRNA stability Several studies have examined changes in Bdnf mRNA levels following GC exposure (Barbany and Persson, 1992; Smith et al., 1995b; Schaaf et al., 1997, 1998; Hansson et al., 2000, 2006; Vellucci et al., 2001). It has been suggested that changes in Bdnf mRNA expression levels predominantly arise as a consequence of altered transcription rather than through possible changes in mRNA stability. Experimental evidence however for this

7

idea is currently limited, and possible effects of GCs on both transcription and degradation of Bdnf mRNAs still need to be tested. It is unknown whether the stability of Bdnf transcript isoforms, containing either the short or the long 30 UTR, is altered by GC exposure. It is of interest to note that GCs have been shown to influence the stability of specific mRNAs including preproglucagon (Zhang et al., 2009) and CRH (Ma et al., 2001), suggesting that in addition to their well-studied transcriptional effects, GCs may also regulate mRNA levels by modulation of mRNA degradation. Influence of glucocorticoids on BDNF translation, processing, trafficking and secretion In addition to the effects at the level of Bdnf mRNA, GCs could also influence BDNF synthesis, secretion and processing (Fig. 1), however this has not been clearly addressed experimentally. GCs have been reported to inhibit specific components of protein translation complexes influencing the rate of translation initiation and protein synthesis (Shah et al., 2000), a role suggested to mediate some of their catabolic effects. Although GCs have been shown to influence the translation of several proteins, GC-evoked decline in BDNF protein levels has largely been attributed to be the consequence of decreased Bdnf transcript expression (Schaaf et al., 1998). It is also possible that GCs may regulate BDNF by influencing its secretion. GCs are known to regulate specific molecules that influence exocytosis such as annexin A1 (John et al., 2006; McArthur et al., 2009), which is reported to be a potent inhibitor of regulated exocytosis. However, to the best of our knowledge no experiments thus far have addressed whether the trafficking of BDNF in the secretory pathway, and its eventual release are modulated by GCs. BDNF undergoes proteolytic processing by intracellular enzymes collectively termed PC including PC1/2 and furin (Seidah et al., 1996), and in the extracellular space is processed by the plasmin–tPA system (Lee et al., 2001; Pang et al., 2004) and MMPs (Lee et al., 2001; Hwang et al., 2005) (Fig. 1(3)). Intriguing reports that corticosterone transcriptionally represses PC1 expression in the PVN (Dong et al., 1997), and that GCs impede plasmin function by inhibiting the plasminogen activator (Gelehrter et al., 1987) raise the possibility that BDNF processing may also be a possible target of GCs (Fig. 1(3)). The importance of regulation of BDNF trafficking has clearly emerged from studies demonstrating that BDNF polymorphisms (BDNFVal66Met) alter the regulated, in particular activity-dependent, secretion of BDNF (Egan et al., 2003) through perturbation of proBDNF–sortilin interaction (Chen et al., 2004), which could evoke differential functional outcomes (Chen et al., 2006). The above studies provide further impetus to address whether GCs can influence the trafficking and transport of BDNF, thus regulating BDNF secretion and function. Stress regulation of BDNF Exposure to acute or chronic stress is a physiological state in which enhanced levels of circulating GCs are

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

8

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

observed. While the purpose of this review is not to exhaustively cover studies that have examined the stress regulation of BDNF, we will compare and contrast some of the key changes observed in BDNF following stress with the results obtained following GC administration. It has been demonstrated by several studies that exposure to a variety of stressors both acute (single stress exposure, (2–8 h)) (Smith et al., 1995a; Ueyama et al., 1997; Lee et al., 2008) and chronic (10 days to 6 weeks) (Murakami et al., 2005; Tsankova et al., 2006; Nair et al., 2007; Rothman et al., 2012) can significantly downregulate both Bdnf mRNA expression and protein levels in the hippocampus. This decrease in Bdnf expression is seen predominantly in the DG and CA3 hippocampal subfields (Smith et al., 1995a; Murakami et al., 2005). However, the duration of stress differentially influences Bdnf expression with short-duration stressors of less than 60 min evoking an induction in hippocampal Bdnf expression and protein levels (Marmige`re et al., 2003; Molteni et al., 2009; Neeley et al., 2011). Overall, the evidence suggests that the effects of stress and GC exposure on Bdnf expression are similar within the hippocampus. In contrast, stress has been shown to cause an increase in Bdnf expression in the frontal cortex (Bland et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2006; Fanous et al., 2010), PVN (Smith et al., 1995a) and amygdala (Fanous et al., 2010; Lakshminarasimhan and Chattarji, 2012). This differs from reports following GC administration, which is largely associated with a decline in Bdnf expression in cortical brain regions, including the frontal cortex (Dwivedi et al., 2006; Gourley et al., 2009). The role of GCs in mediating the effects of stress on Bdnf expression has often been suggested, though few direct studies have addressed this experimentally. In ADX animals, the acute stress-mediated downregulation of Bdnf expression in the DG and CA3 hippocampal subfields is prevented (Smith et al., 1995b). However, restoration of basal levels of circulating corticosterone in ADX animals restores the stress-mediated repression of Bdnf expression (Smith et al., 1995b). These results suggest that basal circulating GCs are required for the effects of stress on hippocampal Bdnf expression. However, stress effects on Bdnf mRNA expression were observed in those ADX animals maintained on basal corticosterone but incapable of showing the stressmediated spike in circulating GCs. These studies support a role for additional factors in contributing to the effects of stress on hippocampal Bdnf expression.

GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTORS AND BDNF While many studies have examined whether changes in circulating GCs alter BDNF expression, relatively a few reports have explored the contribution of the GC receptors MR and GR to the regulation of BDNF (Chao and McEwen, 1994; Hansson et al., 2000; Kino et al., 2010). Pharmacological and genetic strategies (reviewed in Kolber et al., 2008; Arnett et al., 2011) targeting the GC receptors, provide powerful tools to address the contribution of GC receptors to BDNF regulation. In vitro

pharmacological studies demonstrated that aldosterone which has a higher affinity for the MR receptor increased Bdnf mRNA and protein levels in cultured cortical neurons, whereas dexamethasone which has a higher affinity for GR evoked a decline in Bdnf mRNA and protein (Kino et al., 2010). The role of GRs and MRs in the regulation of BDNF has also been examined in a study where ADX animals received corticosterone, aldosterone or RU28362, the synthetic GR agonist (Chao and McEwen, 1994). These studies (Chao and McEwen, 1994; Hansson et al., 2000; Kino et al., 2010) indicate that ligands for both MR and GR regulate hippocampal BDNF expression. However, treatment with the MR antagonists spironolactone (McCullers and Herman, 1998) or eplerenone (Hlavacova et al., 2010) does not appear to alter basal hippocampal Bdnf expression. These studies raise the possibility of differential effects of MR and GR on BDNF expression. Differential effects of GC receptors on BDNF are particularly relevant while considering the results of sustained GC exposure on BDNF, since the dose range utilized in most studies (Barbany and Persson, 1992; Smith et al., 1995b; Schaaf et al., 1997, 1998; Hansson et al., 2000, 2006; Vellucci et al., 2001) suggests a likely recruitment of GR to mediate the GC-evoked decline in BDNF. However, these possibilities need to be carefully examined by addressing whether the effects of chronic GC treatment are blocked by administration of selective GR or MR antagonists, and to address whether these GC receptors exert differential effects on BDNF in a region-specific manner. Many different GR and MR mutants have been generated (reviewed in Kolber et al., 2008; Arnett et al., 2011), including total and forebrain-selective (Boyle et al., 2005) knockouts, total (Ridder et al., 2005) and forebrain-selective (Wei et al., 2004) overexpressor mutants and DNA-binding mutants (Reichardt et al., 2000). While the focus of most studies with GR and MR mutants has been to examine HPA axis regulation, stress-responsivity and mood-related behavior (reviewed in Kolber et al., 2008), a few studies (Ridder et al., 2005; Molteni et al., 2010; Alboni et al., 2011) have addressed molecular changes including regulation of BDNF. GR (+/) heterozygous mice have been reported to show either no change in basal Bdnf mRNA (Molteni et al., 2010), or a reduction in BDNF protein levels in the hippocampus (Ridder et al., 2005), but exhibit an upregulation in the frontal and parietal cortex (Schulte-Herbru¨ggen et al., 2007; Molteni et al., 2010), and the hypothalamus (Schulte-Herbru¨ggen et al., 2007). The induction of Bdnf expression in the hypothalamus of GR+/ mice was also observed in conditional GR mutants (GRflox/+;Sim1Cre+) with a loss of GR restricted to the PVN (Jeanneteau et al., 2012). Further, reports from GR-impaired (GR-i) mice bearing a hypothalamic GR antisense RNA have demonstrated lower hippocampal expression of Bdnf IV mRNA and total Bdnf mRNA levels (Alboni et al., 2011). Such a decline in hippocampal Bdnf expression could also be secondary to alterations in circulating GC levels. Studies with GR-overexpressing mice indicated increased

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

hippocampal (Ridder et al., 2005) and amygdaloid (Schulte-Herbru¨ggen et al., 2006) BDNF expression. A caveat to keep in mind prior to interpretation of the molecular changes observed in GR mutants is whether changes in BDNF are a direct consequences of GR perturbation within the brain region examined, or secondary to alteration in circulating hormones, stressresponsivity and behavior (reviewed in Kolber et al., 2008). Future studies with conditional GR and MR mutants that restrict the genetic perturbation spatiotemporally would provide important insights into the manner in which GC receptors modulate BDNF expression and signaling.

GLUCOCORTICOID REGULATION OF BDNF SIGNALING In addition to the regulation of BDNF mRNA and protein expression, GCs could impinge on BDNF signaling through modulation of the TrkB and P75NTR receptors, and their downstream cascades (Fig. 1(6)). Long-term treatment with corticosterone for 3–7 weeks caused a decline in TrkB protein, but not trkB mRNA levels in the frontal cortex and the hippocampus (Kutiyanawalla et al., 2011). However, it is important to note that the effects of corticosterone treatment may be age dependent. Adult rodents exhibited either no change, or an enhancement in trkB mRNA (Schaaf et al., 1997; Vellucci et al., 2001, 2002) but did not show a reduction in protein levels following chronic corticosterone administration (Kutiyanawalla et al., 2011), whereas postnatal rats showed a gradually emerging but robust increase in trkB mRNA levels in the hippocampus following corticosterone treatment from postnatal day 1 to 12 (Roskoden et al., 2004). However, ADX does not appear to change the basal expression of trkB mRNA in the adult hippocampus (Barbany and Persson, 1993). Thus far the effects of corticosterone on trkB expression in the aged brain are unknown. In this regard it is interesting to note that chronic mild repeated stress evoked a significant increase in trkB mRNA expression in the hippocampus of both young and aged animals (Shao et al., 2010). Further, acute stress has been shown to enhance hippocampal trkB mRNA expression (Shi et al., 2010) but also evokes a rapid downregulation of trkB transcript expression in the pituitary suggesting spatiotemporal differences in trkB transcriptional regulation following stress (Givalois et al., 2001). While most studies have examined the effects of GCs on the catalytic TrkB.FL (Barbany and Persson, 1993; Schaaf et al., 1997; Vellucci et al., 2001; Roskoden et al., 2004), a few studies thus far have addressed whether corticosterone or stress differentially influences trkB transcript variants (Vellucci et al., 2002; Shao et al., 2010). Chronic dexamethasone treatment for 5 days induced an increase in truncated trkB transcript expression with no effects noted on trkB.FL expression (Vellucci et al., 2002). Longer duration corticosterone treatment also did not alter hippocampal catalytic trkB expression (Kutiyanawalla et al., 2011). It has been shown that chronic, but not acute,

9

immobilization stress (Nibuya et al., 1999) and chronic unpredictable stress (Shao et al., 2010) enhanced catalytic trkB.FL mRNA expression, without influencing the expression of the truncated trkB mRNA transcripts. Unlike chronic stress, which appears to predominantly enhance hippocampal trkB mRNA expression (Nibuya et al., 1999; Li et al., 2007; Shao et al., 2010; Shi et al., 2010), relatively sustained corticosterone treatment has been largely associated with a decline in TrkB protein levels but no major changes in trkB mRNA expression (Kutiyanawalla et al., 2011). This suggests that the effects of stress on hippocampal trkB expression are unlikely to be mediated via corticosterone. A systematic characterization of the effects of GCs on the alternative splicing of the trkB transcripts has not been carried out. Further, an important question that is relatively unexplored is the influence of GCs on p75NTR expression. GCs could powerfully alter BDNF signaling by influencing the stoichiometry of the catalytic and truncated TrkB receptor, and the low-affinity p75NTR. While GCs have thus far not been shown to influence TrkB receptor trafficking, intriguing reports indicate that corticosterone can influence glutamate receptor dynamics through regulation of exocytotic/endocytotic pathways via the Rab GTPases (Liu et al., 2010). Support for the view that chronic GC administration is associated with reduced BDNF signaling comes from evidence that chronic corticosterone treatment in adult animals results in a significant decline in phospho-Trk (pTrk) expression within the hippocampus (Gourley et al., 2008b). Decreased pTrkB is accompanied by a reduction in phosphorylated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) levels in the DG. Attenuated BDNF signaling emerges only following fairly prolonged corticosterone treatment, and appears to be preceded by a decline in hippocampal TrkB protein levels (Gourley et al., 2008b). However in contrast, GC administration in vitro to cortical neurons and in vivo treatment to postnatal day 18 rats has been reported to increase pTrkB expression within the hippocampus in the absence of any change in BDNF (Jeanneteau et al., 2008). In ex vivo cortical slice preparations, dexamethasone treatment resulted in slow-onset increases in pTrkB, pPLC, pAKT and pERK (Jeanneteau et al., 2008). These results suggest that GCs selectively enhance phosphorylation of the Trk receptors and down-stream signaling proteins through GR-mediated genomic effects. The differing effects noted in pTrk expression following chronic GC treatment could be a consequence of the developmental stage in question. It can be hypothesized that GCs play a protective role against excitotoxic damage at early postnatal stages, as would be suggested by increased GC-evoked pTrkB and evidence of reduced susceptibility to glutamate-induced neurotoxicity (Mattson et al., 1995). In contrast, within the mature brain GCs through reductions in pTrkB signaling may serve to enhance vulnerability to excitotoxic damage (Stein-Behrens et al., 1992; MacPherson et al., 2005). While currently highly speculative, the evidence thus far suggests differing effects of GCs on both pTrkB as well as excitotoxic susceptibility, and the age-dependent

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

10

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

nature of such differences requires systematic experimental testing. Further, a recent study suggests that progressive enhancement of corticosterone levels can increase the basal activation of ERK suggesting that variation in corticosterone doses may have differential consequences (Munhoz et al., 2010). BDNF activates several intracellular cascades via the full-length TrkB receptor including MAPK pathways, PI3 kinase and PLCc (reviewed in Reichardt, 2006). The coupling of TrkB to these signaling pathways (Fig. 1(6)) is mediated via specific intracellular adaptor proteins including Grb2/Src homology-2 domain-containing phosphatase 2 (Shp2) complex for ERK1/2 activation and growth factor receptor-bound protein 2/son of sevenless (Grb2/SOS) complex recruitment for Ras activation (reviewed in Dance et al., 2008). For MAPK activation, Shp2 forms a signaling complex with TrkB and prolongs MAP kinase signaling by dephosphorylating and thus inactivating the MAP kinase inhibitor sprouty (Hanafusa et al., 2004). In vitro studies (Kumamaru et al., 2011) in cortical neurons have demonstrated that dexamethasone treatment inhibits the MAP kinase pathway by altering the TrkB association with Shp2, thus impairing the robust and prolonged activation of the MAP kinase pathway (Kumamaru et al., 2011). Though GCs do not alter the expression or the phosphorylation status of Shp2, they impair TrkB–Shrp2 association (Kumamaru et al., 2011) thus serving as brakes to terminate or limit the duration of BDNFmediated ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 1(6)). Further, MAP-kinase signaling which is downstream of BDNF could also be influenced by GCs through a modulation of MAP kinase phosphatase-1 (MKP-1) (Kassel et al., 2001) (Fig. 1(6)). Dexamethasone has been shown to reduce pERK levels by enhancing the transcription of the corticosteroid-inducible gene MKP-1 in a variety of cell types including mast cells (Kassel et al., 2001), smooth muscle (Manetsch et al., 2012), pancreatic islets (Nicoletti-Carvalho et al., 2010) and activated microglia (Zhou et al., 2007; Huo et al., 2011), likely through genomic effects via GR. Further, the proteasomal degradation of MKP-1 is also inhibited by GCs thus further serving to enhance MKP-1 levels and to reduce pERK signaling (Kassel et al., 2001). Future studies are required to address whether GC influence on MKP-1 and Shrp2 plays a role in the GC modulation of ERK signaling in the hippocampus and other brain regions. It is interesting to note that a recent study demonstrates that corticosterone treatment also increases MKP-1 expression within the frontal cortex and hippocampus (Munhoz et al., 2010). In addition to impacting ERK signaling, GCs have also been shown to perturb specific downstream targets of BDNF such as the BDNFinduced and ERK-mediated upregulation of the microRNA, miR-132 (Kawashima et al., 2010). Corticosterone treatment of cortical neurons in vitro significantly attenuated the upregulation of miR-132 by BDNF, likely through an attenuation of pERK signaling (Kawashima et al., 2010). It is important here to note that acute stressors have been reported to evoke a robust enhancement in pERK1/2 levels both within the

PVN of the hypothalamus (Sasaguri et al., 2005; Osterlund et al., 2011) and in the hippocampus (Yang et al., 2004). This differs from the reported effects of GCs, which appear to terminate or reduce ERK signaling (Gourley et al., 2008b). In fact, the effects of stress on PVN pERK expression were augmented in animals that had been adrenalectomized, but ADX animals showed no baseline change in PVN pERK1/2 expression (Osterlund et al., 2011). In contrast, within the hippocampus the effects of stress on pERK were prevented by GR antagonists (Yang et al., 2004). This suggests that GCs have region-specific roles in contributing to the effects of stress on pERK signaling, where in the hypothalamus they may serve to attenuate some of the effects of stress on pERK signaling (Osterlund et al., 2011), whereas in the hippocampus they are likely mediators of the induction of pERK by stress. A consensus on the contribution of GCs to the effects of stress on BDNF signaling is yet to emerge, with differing effects reported based on the nature of stressor and the brain region examined. The regulation of PLCc signaling by BDNF is also influenced by GCs (Fig. 1(6)), since dexamethasone treatment has been reported to reduce the BDNFdependent binding of PLC to TrkB in cultured cortical neurons (Numakawa et al., 2009). Cytosolic GR is reported to directly interact with TrkB, an interaction enhances the TrkB–PLCc signaling pathway (Numakawa et al., 2009). Chronic in vitro dexamethasone or corticosterone treatment by downregulation of GR levels, reduces the interaction of TrkB with GR, and serves to decrease the PLCc stimulation by BDNF (Numakawa et al., 2009) (Fig. 1(6)). The effects of GCs could be replicated through knockdown of GR, and the effects of GCs on reducing PLCc activation could be prevented by GR overexpression suggesting that the effects of GCs on the BDNF–PLC pathway were mediated via the TrkB– GR interaction (Numakawa et al., 2009). It is interesting to note recent reports (Jeanneteau et al., 2008) that suggest a direct effect of GCs on TrkB phosphorylation and activation. GCs may also influence BDNF signaling via the PI3-Kinase–Akt pathway (Zhang and Daynes, 2007). GCs have been shown to increase the expression of the phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5trisphosphate 5-phosphatase 1 (SHIP1), which is a negative regulator of the PI3 kinase pathway (Zhang and Daynes, 2007). GCs in addition to modulation of signaling through intracellular cascades coupled to the TrkB receptor could also influence the pathways downstream of the p75NTR such as the JNK signaling cascade, NF-jB activation, ceramide signaling and Rho family GTPases (reviewed in Roux and Barker, 2002; Reichardt, 2006). Corticosterone administration has been shown to increase JNK activation within the frontal cortex and the hippocampus in a dose-dependent fashion (Munhoz et al., 2010), and could thus influence p75NTR-evoked JNK recruitment. While several studies have examined the effects of corticosterone on JNK signaling and NF-jB activation in diverse cell types (Auphan et al.,

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

1995; Ramdas and Harmon, 1998; Li et al., 2001; Qi et al., 2005), these have not been in the context of addressing whether GCs influence p75NTR-mediated recruitment of these pathways. Thus, there is a lack of understanding of whether GCs could impinge on the low-affinity neurotrophin receptor-based signaling either via an influence at the level of the receptor itself, or through effects on downstream cascades. In summary, GC regulation of BDNF signaling could occur at multiple levels, through a modulation of the ligand via regulation of its expression, synthesis and secretion, proteolytic processing, modulation of receptor expression, trafficking and coupling to signaling cascades, and through interactions of specific adaptor proteins with the BDNF signaling pathways (Fig. 1). Emerging evidence suggests that GCs may influence BDNF signaling at several of these different levels. However, while substantial investigation has focused on examining regulation at the level of expression of BDNF, thus far limited studies have addressed whether synthesis, trafficking, secretion and proteolytic processing of BDNF are targeted by GCs. Further, investigation of the influence of GCs on BDNF receptors has been largely restricted to the TrkB pathway with little known about the influence of GCs on the lowaffinity p75NTR receptor. The evidence thus far provides strong impetus for future studies that address the mechanistic underpinnings of how GCs regulate both basal and stimulus-evoked BDNF signaling. In the absence of this detailed examination, conclusions regarding the contribution of GCs to the effects of stress on BDNF signaling are still premature, and the current literature does not provide an emerging consensus on whether the effects of stress on BDNF signaling in the brain are mediated via or independent of GCs.

GLUCOCORTICOIDS AND BDNF CROSSTALK: IMPLICATIONS FOR HIPPOCAMPAL STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL PLASTICITY GCs and BDNF both mediate a potent influence on various aspects of hippocampal structural (reviewed in Fuchs et al., 2001; reviewed in Yoshii and Constantine-Paton, 2010) and cellular plasticity (reviewed in Schoenfeld and Gould, 2012; reviewed in Schmidt and Duman, 2007), and hippocampaldependent function (reviewed in Kim and Diamond, 2002; Lu et al., 2008) and behavior (reviewed in Duman and Monteggia, 2006; Joe¨ls, 2008). These effects often tend to be opposing in nature. This has led to the working hypothesis that some of the effects of GCs on the hippocampus may be a consequence of evoking a decline in BDNF expression and BDNF-mediated functional outcomes (reviewed in Smith, 1996; Kunugi et al., 2010). The effects of GCs and BDNF on plasticity and hippocampal function have been extensively reviewed elsewhere (Poo, 2001; Schmidt and Duman, 2007; Joe¨ls, 2008; Yoshii and Constantine-Paton, 2010; Schoenfeld and Gould, 2012), and in this review we focus our attention on those studies that directly examine possible functional interactions between GCs and BDNF in their effects on hippocampal plasticity.

11

GC and BDNF interactions in the context of cell survival and structural plasticity BDNF functions as a powerful modulator of structural plasticity in the hippocampus (reviewed in Yoshii and Constantine-Paton, 2010) and mediates protective influences via enhancing neuronal survival (reviewed in Lipsky and Marini, 2007) in particular under conditions of metabolic (Nitta et al., 1999) and excitotoxic insults (Mattson et al., 1995). Conversely, sustained GC exposure leads to dendritic atrophy in hippocampal subfields (Sousa et al., 2000) and decreases neuronal cell survival (Sapolsky et al., 1990), and is also known to evoke a decline in Bdnf expression in hippocampal and cortical regions (Smith et al., 1995b; Dwivedi et al., 2006). While it is unclear whether the decline in Bdnf expression precedes the adverse consequences of GCs on cell survival and synaptic plasticity, as they have not been addressed in the same study, timelines from distinct studies support this possibility. Thus far few studies have tested whether preventing the GC-mediated decline in BDNF, or exogenous BDNF administration, is capable of attenuating the adverse effects of GCs on neuronal survival in vivo. In vitro studies have addressed this possibility by showing that the corticosterone-induced acceleration of neuronal death resulting from serum deprivation (Nitta et al., 1999) is accompanied by reductions in the levels of Bdnf mRNA and protein in cultured hippocampal neurons. Further, exogenously added BDNF attenuates the corticosterone-induced neuronal death, an effect prevented by a Trk inhibitor (Nitta et al., 1999). These observations support the notion that specific GC effects on neuronal cell death may involve a role for decreased BDNF signaling. GCs and BDNF exert distinct actions on hippocampal neurogenesis with GCs reducing new neuron formation (Cameron and Gould, 1994; Boku et al., 2009) and BDNF serving to promote neurogenesis (Lee et al., 2002; Scharfman et al., 2005). It is important to note that the effects of GCs largely involve a reduction in progenitor proliferation (Cameron and Gould, 1994; Boku et al., 2009), whereas BDNF appears to influence multiple progenitor stages altering proliferation (Lee et al., 2002; Scharfman et al., 2005) and also promotes progenitor survival (Sairanen et al., 2005) and neuronal differentiation (Chan et al., 2008). This raises the possibility that GCs and BDNF may influence distinct progenitor stages, and any functional interactions between these pathways to modulate new neuron generation have yet to be systematically tested. Insights into crosstalk between GC signaling and BDNF come from in vitro evidence (Kumamaru et al., 2008) demonstrating that the BDNF-mediated enhancement in neurite outgrowth of cortical neurons is blocked on pretreatment with dexamethasone. Strikingly, GCs besides blocking neurite outgrowth also prevent the effects of BDNF on the induction of key synaptic proteins namely synapsin and glutamate receptor subunits (Kumamaru et al., 2008). BDNF is also known to promote the formation of synapses and to potentiate the Ca2+ influx evoked by glutamate in mature cortical neurons, effects that were prevented in

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

12

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

the presence of dexamethasone (Kumamaru et al., 2008). These effects of GCs are mediated via an inhibition of BDNF-evoked MAP kinase signaling, and likely involve the GR receptor as they are prevented by GR receptor antagonists (Kumamaru et al., 2008). Crosstalk between GCs and BDNF is also supported by evidence from in vivo studies addressing the regulation of hypothalamic CRH expression (Jeanneteau et al., 2012). While BDNF enhances CRH, GR signaling causes a decline in PVN CRH expression. The BDNFmediated induction of CRH transcription involves a role for TrkB-mediated effects on CREB (Jeanneteau et al., 2012). GR abrogates the function of the CREB co-activator CRTC2 thus preventing the BDNF-mediated increases in CRH expression (Jeanneteau et al., 2012). This is an interesting example of how the GR and BDNF pathways may interact to differentially modulate target gene expression, and provide impetus for future studies to examine in depth the crosstalk between these pathways, in particular in the context of their modulation of hippocampal plasticity. GC and BDNF interaction in the context of synaptic plasticity and hippocampal-dependent behavior Both GCs and BDNF differentially modulate cellular excitability and influence LTP. High levels of GCs predominantly impair LTP production and alter Ca2+ influx (reviewed in Prager and Johnson, 2009). In contrast, BDNF largely serves to promote LTP (reviewed in Minichiello, 2009), and influences cellular excitability by strengthening postsynaptic glutamatergic currents through enhanced activation of glutamatergic receptors and calcium channels (Kovalchuk et al., 2002; reviewed in Minichiello, 2009), and by enhancing the release probability of presynaptic glutamatergic vesicles (Jovanovic et al., 2000). It has been reported that exposure to dexamethasone suppresses BDNF-induced presynaptic glutamate release in cortical neuronal cultures by attenuating the activation of the PLCc/Ca2+ system by BDNF treatment (Numakawa et al., 2009). The decreased activation of the PLCc system following dexamethasone treatment involves a reduction of GR expression, and an ensuing impairment in TrkB–GR interaction, which modulates the coupling of PLC to TrkB (Numakawa et al., 2009). It can be envisioned that the GC-mediated inhibitory effects on BDNF presynaptic neurotransmitter release could contribute to some of the negative effects of GCs on cellular excitability and synaptic plasticity. BDNF and GCs have also been shown to differentially influence the Ca2+-activated potassium channel SK2. BDNF-mediated enhancement of LTP is hypothesized to involve a role for the BDNF-mediated phosphorylation and inhibition of SK2 channel function (Krama´r et al., 2004). GCs have been demonstrated to enhance the mRNA expression of SK2 through transcriptional effects at the SK2 promoter (Kye et al., 2007). While the above studies (Kumamaru et al., 2008; Numakawa et al., 2009; Jeanneteau et al., 2012) point to possible stages in the BDNF signaling cascade for functional crosstalk with GCs and their receptors, further

studies are required to address the extent of contribution of BDNF to the effects of GCs on cellular excitability. Concomittant with the largely opposing effects on cellular excitability, GCs (reviewed in Prager and Johnson, 2009) and BDNF also demonstrate contrasting effects on the induction of LTP (Pavlides et al., 1993; Minichiello et al., 1999). It has been reported that exogenous corticosterone application to hippocampal slices significantly attenuates tetanus-induced LTP excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) slope and impairs paired-pulse facilitation in CA1 pyramidal neurons (Zhou et al., 2000). These changes arise associated with a significant reduction in Bdnf expression in the CA1 hippocampal subfield (Zhou et al., 2000). Strikingly, BDNF co-applied with corticosterone rescued the GC-mediated deficit in paired-pulse facilitation and normalizes the GC effects on EPSP slope (Zhou et al., 2000). Further, chronic BDNF infusion was also capable of ameliorating the chronic stress-induced impairments in hippocampal LTP and spatial learning and memory (Radecki et al., 2005). These results suggest that specific effects of GCs and stress on hippocampal synaptic plasticity are likely to involve an important role for BDNF. While GCs and BDNF exert largely opposing effects on LTP, their influence on learning and memory is not as distinct. While BDNF largely promotes learning and improves hippocampal-dependent cognitive function (reviewed in Tyler et al., 2002), the influence of GCs on learning and memory is highly dependent on dose, timing and context of GC administration with respect to the cognitive task (Korz and Frey, 2003; reviewed in Kim and Diamond, 2002). GC administration has been shown to both evoke impairments (reviewed in Sandi and Pinelo-Nava, 2007) and improve performance (Sandi et al., 1997) on hippocampal-dependent learning and memory paradigms. Animal models of depression and anxiety are associated with disrupted HPA axis function (Henn and Vollmayr, 2005; Touma et al., 2008; Bowens et al., 2011). Chronic GC administration itself serves as an animal model for depression (Gourley et al., 2008a,b), mimicking specific components of the endophenotypes observed in clinical depression. While animals exposed to elevated GC levels exhibit increased anxiety, anhedonia and depressive behaviors (Gourley et al., 2008a,b), BDNF administration evokes largely opposing effects with a decrease in anxiety and depressive behaviors (Shirayama et al., 2002). The mood-related behavioral effects of GCs and BDNF in animal models are predominantly contrasting in nature. Animal models of depression generated by elevating GC levels also show a robust decline in hippocampal BDNF that accompanies the behavioral changes in these models (Gourley et al., 2008a,b; Diniz et al., 2011). Strikingly, hippocampal BDNF infusion in animals receiving chronic corticosterone was capable of rescuing the depressivelike behavior evoked by GC exposure on the forced swim test (Gourley et al., 2008a). Future experiments are required to test whether the mood-modulating actions of GCs involve a role for abrogating or preventing the anti-depressant like effects of BDNF.

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

CONCLUSIONS In summary, the regulation of BDNF by GCs is likely to occur at multiple levels in the BDNF signaling pathway, with most evidence thus far for effects of GCs on Bdnf mRNA expression. Several studies also suggest that GCs may alter BDNF signaling by modulating downstream signal transduction cascades for the ERK, PLC and PI3–Akt pathways. However, few studies have thus far examined whether GCs influence BDNF synthesis, stability, trafficking, processing or release, or addressed effects at the levels of the TrkB receptor isoforms and p75NTR. Given the current working hypothesis that some of the negative effects of GCs on structural and synaptic plasticity arise by evoking a decline in BDNF signaling, it is essential to gain an indepth mechanistic insight of how GCs impinge on the regulation of BDNF at multiple levels. Further, it is important to understand the reciprocal crosstalk between GCs and their receptors, and BDNF signaling pathways, to place in context how these pathways may interact under physiological conditions including stress, and contribute to the genesis of pathophysiological states.

REFERENCES Aid T, Kazantseva A, Piirsoo M, Palm K, Timmusk T (2007) Mouse and rat BDNF gene structure and expression revisited. J Neurosci Res 85:525–535. Alboni S, Tascedda F, Corsini D, Benatti C, Caggia F, Capone G, Barden N, Blom JM, Brunello N (2011) Stress induces altered CRE/CREB pathway activity and BDNF expression in the hippocampus of glucocorticoid receptor-impaired mice. Neuropharmacology 60:1337–1346. An JJ, Gharami K, Liao GY, Woo NH, Lau AG, Vanevski F, Torre ER, Jones KR, Feng Y, Lu B, Xu B (2008) Distinct role of long 30 UTR BDNF mRNA in spine morphology and synaptic plasticity in hippocampal neurons. Cell Death Dis 134:175–187. Arnett MG, Kolber BJ, Boyle MP, Muglia LJ (2011) Behavioral insights from mouse models of forebrain- and amygdala-specific glucocorticoid receptor genetic disruption. Mol Cell Endocrinol 336:2–5. Arriza JL, Simerly RB, Swanson LW, Evans RM (1988) The neuronal mineralocorticoid receptor as a mediator of glucocorticoid response. Neuron 1:887–900. Auphan N, DiDonato JA, Rosette C, Helmberg A, Karin M (1995) Immunosuppression by glucocorticoids: inhibition of NF-kappa B activity through induction of I kappa B synthesis. Science 270:286–290. Baj G, D’Alessandro V, Musazzi L, Mallei A, Sartori CR, Sciancalepore M, Tardito D, Langone F, Popoli M, Tongiorgi E (2012) Physical exercise and antidepressants enhance BDNF targeting in hippocampal CA3 dendrites: further evidence of a spatial code for BDNF splice variants. Neuropsychopharmacology 37:1600–1611. Barbany G, Persson H (1992) Regulation of neurotrophin mRNA expression in the rat brain by glucocorticoids. Eur J Neurosci 4:396–403. Barbany G, Persson H (1993) Adrenalectomy attenuates kainic acidelicited increases of messenger RNAs for neurotrophins and their receptors in the rat brain. Neuroscience 54:909–922. Barnabe´-Heider F, Miller FD (2003) Endogenously produced neurotrophins regulate survival and differentiation of cortical progenitors via distinct signaling pathways. J Neurosci 23:5149–5160. Baxter GT, Radeke MJ, Kuo RC, Makrides V, Hinkle B, Hoang R, Medina-Selby A, Coit D, Valenzuela P, Feinstein SC (1997)

13

Signal transduction mediated by the truncated trkB receptor isoforms, trkB.T1 and trkB.T2. J Neurosci 17:2683–2690. Beato M (1989) Gene regulation by steroid hormones. Cell Death Dis 56:335–344. Benraiss A, Chmielnicki E, Lerner K, Roh D, Goldman SA (2001) Adenoviral brain-derived neurotrophic factor induces both neostriatal and olfactory neuronal recruitment from endogenous progenitor cells in the adult forebrain. J Neurosci 21:6718–6731. Bergami M, Rimondini R, Santi S, Blum R, Gotz M, Canossa M (2008) Deletion of TrkB in adult progenitors alters newborn neuron integration into hippocampal circuits and increases anxiety-like behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:15570–15575. Bernd P (2008) The role of neurotrophins during early development. Gene Expr 14:241–250. Bibel M, Hoppe E, Barde YA (1999) Biochemical and functional interactions between the neurotrophin receptors trk and p75NTR. EMBO J 18:616–622. Bland ST, Schmid MJ, Der-Avakian A, Watkins LR, Spencer RL, Maier SF (2005) Expression of c-fos and BDNF mRNA in subregions of the prefrontal cortex of male and female rats after acute uncontrollable stress. Brain Res 1051:90–99. Boku S, Nakagawa S, Masuda T, Nishikawa H, Kato A, Kitaichi Y, Inoue T, Koyama T (2009) Glucocorticoids and lithium reciprocally regulate the proliferation of adult dentate gyrus-derived neural precursor cells through GSK-3beta and beta-catenin/TCF pathway. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:805–815. Bowens N, Heydendael W, Bhatnagar S, Jacobson L (2011) Lack of elevations in glucocorticoids correlates with dysphoria-like behavior after repeated social defeat. Physiol Behav 105:958–965. Boyle MP, Brewer JA, Funatsu M, Wozniak DF, Tsien JZ, Izumi Y, Muglia LJ (2005) Acquired deficit of forebrain glucocorticoid receptor produces depression-like changes in adrenal axis regulation and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:473–478. Cameron HA, Gould E (1994) Adult neurogenesis is regulated by adrenal steroids in the dentate gyrus. Neuroscience 61:203–209. Causing CG, Gloster A, Aloyz R, Bamji SX, Chang E, Fawcett J, Kuchel G, Miller FD (1997) Synaptic innervation density is regulated by neuron-derived BDNF. Neuron 18:257–267. Chao HM, McEwen BS (1994) Glucocorticoids and the expression of mRNAs for neurotrophins, their receptors and GAP-43 in the rat hippocampus. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 26:271–276. Chao MV, Bothwell M (2002) Neurotrophins: to cleave or not to cleave. Neuron 33:9–12. Chao MV (2003) Neurotrophins and their receptors: a convergence point for many signalling pathways. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:299–309. Chan JP, Cordeira J, Calderon GA, Iyer LK, Rios M (2008) Depletion of central BDNF in mice impedes terminal differentiation of new granule neurons in the adult hippocampus. Mol Cell Neurosci 39:372–383. Chen WG, Chang Q, Lin Y, Meissner A, West AE, Griffith EC, Jaenisch R, Greenberg ME (2003) Derepression of BDNF transcription involves calcium-dependent phosphorylation of MeCP2. Science 302:885–889. Chen ZY, Patel PD, Sant G, Meng CX, Teng KK, Hempstead BL, Lee F (2004) Variant brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), (Met66) alters the intracellular trafficking and activity-dependent secretion of wild-type BDNF in neurosecretory cells and cortical neurons. J Neurosci 24:4401–4411. Chen ZY, Ieraci A, Teng H, Dall H, Meng CX, Herrera DG, Nykjaer A, Hempstead BL, Lee FS (2005) Sortilin controls intracellular sorting of BDNF to the regulated secretory pathway. J Neurosci 25:6156–6166. Chen ZY, Jing D, Bath KG, Ieraci A, Khan T, Siao CJ, Herrera DG, Toth M, Yang C, McEwen BS, Hempstead BL, Lee FS (2006) Genetic variant BDNF (Val66Met) polymorphism alters anxietyrelated behavior. Science 314:140–143. Chiaruttini C, Sonego M, Baj G, Simonato M, Tongiorgi E (2008) BDNF mRNA splice variants display activity dependent targeting to distinct hippocampal laminae. Mol Cell Neurosci 37:11–19.

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

14

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

Chiaruttini C, Vicario A, Li Z, Baj G, Braiuca P, Wu Y, Lee FS, Gardossi L, Baraban JM, Tongiorgi E (2009) Dendritic trafficking of BDNF mRNA is mediated by translin and blocked by the G196A (Val66Met) mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 16481–16486. Cirulli F, Berry A, Chiarotti F, Alleva E (2004) Intrahippocampal administration of BDNF in adult rats affects short-term behavioral plasticity in the Morris water maze and performance in the elevated plus-maze. Hippocampus 14:802–807. Conrad CD (2008) Chronic stress-induced hippocampal vulnerability: the glucocorticoid vulnerability hypothesis. Rev Neurosci 19:395–411. Dallman MF (2005) Fast glucocorticoid actions on brain: back to the future. Front Neuroendocrinol 26:103–108. Dance M, Montagner A, Salles JP, Yart A, Raynal P (2008) The molecular functions of Shp2 in the Ras/Mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK1/2) pathway. Cell Signal 20:453–459. De Kloet ER, Derijk R (2004) Signaling pathways in brain involved in predisposition and pathogenesis of stress-related disease: genetic and kinetic factors affecting the MR/GR balance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1032:14–34. De Kloet ER, Joels M, Holsboer F (2005) Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:463–475. De Kloet ER (2008) About stress hormones and resilience to psychopathology. J Neuroendocrinol 20:885–892. Dias BG, Banerjee SB, Duman RS, Vaidya VA (2003) Differential regulation of brain derived neurotrophic factor transcripts by antidepressant treatments in the adult rat brain. Neuropharmacology 45:553–563. Diefenbacher M, Sekula S, Heilbock C, Maier JV, Litfin M, van Dam H, Castellazzi M, Herrlich P, Kassel O (2008) Restriction to Fos family members of Trip6-dependent coactivation and glucocorticoid receptor-dependent trans-repression of activator protein-1. Mol Endocrinol 22:1767–1780. Diniz L, Dos Reis BB, de Castro GM, Medalha CC, Viana MB (2011) Effects of chronic corticosterone and imipramine administration on panic and anxiety-related responses. Braz J Med Biol Res 44:1048–1053. Dong W, Seidel B, Marcinkiewicz M, Chre´tien M, Seidah NG, Day R (1997) Cellular localization of the prohormone convertases in the hypothalamic paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei: selective regulation of PC1 in corticotrophin-releasing hormone parvocellular neurons mediated by glucocorticoids. J Neurosci 17:563–575. Dostert A, Heinzel T (2004) Negative glucocorticoid receptor response elements and their role in glucocorticoid action. Curr Pharm Des 10:2807–2816. Duman RS, Monteggia LM (2006) A neurotrophic model for stressrelated mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry 59:1116–1127. Dwivedi Y, Rizavi HS, Pandey GN (2006) Antidepressants reverse corticosterone-mediated decrease in brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression: differential regulation of specific exons by antidepressants and corticosterone. Neuroscience 139: 1017–1029. Egan MF, Kojima M, Callicott JH, Goldberg TE, Kolachana BS, Bertolino A, Zaitsev E, Gold B, Goldman D, Dean M, Lu B, Weinberger DR (2003) The BDNF val66met polymorphism affects activity-dependent secretion of BDNF and human memory and hippocampal function. Cell Death Dis 112:257–269. Eide FF, Vining ER, Eide BL, Zang K, Wang XY, Reichardt LF (1996) Naturally occurring truncated trkB receptors have dominant inhibitory effects on brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling. J Neurosci 16:3123–3129. Fanous S, Hammer Jr RP, Nikulina EM (2010) Short- and long-term effects of intermittent social defeat stress on brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in mesocorticolimbic brain regions. Neuroscience 167:598–607. Fayard B, Loeffler S, Weis J, Vo¨gelin E, Kru¨ttgen A (2005) The secreted brain-derived neurotrophic factor precursor pro-BDNF binds to TrkB and p75NTR but not to TrkA or TrkC. J Neurosci Res 80:18–28.

Figurov A, Pozzo-Miller LD, Olafsson P, Wang T, Lu B (1996) Regulation of synaptic responses to high-frequency stimulation and LTP by neurotrophins in the hippocampus. Nature 381:706–709. Fryer RH, Kaplan DR, Feinstein SC, Radeke MJ, Grayson DR, Kromer LF (1996) Developmental and mature expression of fulllength and truncated TrkB receptors in the rat forebrain. J Comp Neurol 374:21–40. Fuchs E, Flu¨gge G, Ohl F, Lucassen P, Vollmann-Honsdorf GK, Michaelis T (2001) Psychosocial stress, glucocorticoids, and structural alterations in the tree shrew hippocampus. Physiol Behav 73:285–291. Fukuchi M, Tsuda M (2010) Involvement of the 30 -untranslated region of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene in activity-dependent mRNA stabilization. J Neurochem 115:1222–1233. Gelehrter TD, Sznycer-Laszuk R, Zeheb R, Cwikel BJ (1987) Dexamethasone inhibition of tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) activity: paradoxical induction of both tPA antigen and plasminogen activator inhibitor. Mol Endocrinol 1:97–101. Givalois L, Marmige`re F, Rage F, Ixart G, Arancibia S, TapiaArancibia L (2001) Immobilization stress rapidly and differentially modulates BDNF and TrkB mRNA expression in the pituitary gland of adult male rats. Neuroendocrinology 74:148–159. Goodman LJ, Valverde J, Lim F, Geschwind MD, Federoff HJ, Geller AI, Hefti F (1996) Regulated release and polarized localization of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in hippocampal neurons. Mol Cell Neurosci 7:222–238. Gourley SL, Kiraly DD, Howell JL, Olausson P, Taylor JR (2008a) Acute hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor restores motivational and forced swim performance after corticosterone. Biol Psychiatry 64:884–890. Gourley SL, Wu FJ, Kiraly DD, Ploski JE, Kedves AT, Duman RS, Taylor JR (2008b) Regionally specific regulation of ERK MAP kinase in a model of antidepressant-sensitive chronic depression. Biol Psychiatry 63:353–359. Gourley SL, Kedves AT, Olausson P, Taylor JR (2009) A history of corticosterone exposure regulates fear extinction and cortical NR2B, GluR2/3, and BDNF. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:707–716. Hanafusa H, Torii S, Yasunaga T, Matsumoto K, Nishida E (2004) Shp2, an SH2-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase, positively regulates receptor tyrosine kinase signaling by dephosphorylating and inactivating the inhibitor sprouty. J Biol Chem 279:22992–22995. Hansson AC, Cintra A, Belluardo N, Sommer W, Bhatnagar M, Bader M, Ganten D, Fuxe K (2000) Gluco- and mineralocorticoid receptor-mediated regulation of neurotrophic factor gene expression in the dorsal hippocampus and the neocortex of the rat. Eur J Neurosci 12:2918–2934. Hansson AC, Sommer WH, Metsis M, Stro¨mberg I, Agnati LF, Fuxe K (2006) Corticosterone actions on the hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression are mediated by exon IV promoter. J Neuroendocrinol 18:104–114. Haynes LE, Barber D, Mitchell IJ (2004) Chronic antidepressant medication attenuates dexamethasone-induced neuronal death and sublethal neuronal damage in the hippocampus and striatum. Brain Res 1026:157–167. Hayes VY, Towner MD, Isackson PJ (1997) Organization, sequence and functional analysis of a mouse BDNF promoter. Mol Brain Res 45:189–198. Henn FA, Vollmayr B (2005) Stress models of depression: forming genetically vulnerable strains. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:799–804. Herman JP, Cullinan WE (1997) Neurocircuitry of stress: central control of the hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenocortical axis. Trends Neurosci 20:78–84. Herman JP, Figueiredo H, Mueller NK, Ulrich-Lai Y, Ostrander MM, Choi DD, Cullinan WE (2003) Central mechanisms of stress integration: hierarchical circuitry controlling hypothalamo– pituitary–adrenocortical responsiveness. Front Neuroendocrinol 24:151–180.

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Hlavacova N, Bakos J, Jezova D (2010) Eplerenone, a selective mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, exerts anxiolytic effects accompanied by changes in stress hormone. J Psychopharmacol 24:779–786. Hossain A, Hajman K, Charitidi K, Erhardt S, Zimmermann U, Knipper M, Canlon B (2008) Prenatal dexamethasone impairs behavior and the activation of the BDNF exon IV promoter in the paraventricular nucleus in adult offspring. Endocrinology 149:6356–6365. Huo Y, Rangarajan P, Ling EA, Dheen ST (2011) Dexamethasone inhibits the Nox-dependent ROS production via suppression of MKP-1-dependent MAPK pathways in activated microglia. BMC Neurosci 12:49. Hwang JJ, Park MH, Choi SY, Koh JY (2005) Activation of the Trk signaling pathway by extracellular zinc. Role of metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem 280:11995–12001. Jankord R, Herman JP (2008) Limbic regulation of hypothalamo– pituitary–adrenocortical function during acute and chronic stress. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1148:64–73. Jeanneteau F, Garabedian MJ, Chao MV (2008) Activation of Trk neurotrophin receptors by glucocorticoids provides a neuroprotective effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:4862–4867. Jeanneteau FD, Lambert WM, Ismaili N, Bath KG, Lee FS, Garabedian MJ, Chao MV (2012) BDNF and glucocorticoids regulate corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) homeostasis in the hypothalamus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:1305–1310. Joe¨ls M (2008) Functional actions of corticosteroids in the hippocampus. Eur J Pharmacol 583:312–321. Joe¨ls M (2011) Impact of glucocorticoids on brain function: relevance for mood disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36:406–414. John CD, Theogaraj E, Christian HC, Morris JF, Smith SF, Buckingham JC (2006) Time-specific effects of perinatal glucocorticoid treatment on anterior pituitary morphology, annexin 1 expression and adrenocorticotrophic hormone secretion in the adult female rat. J Neuroendocrinol 18:949–959. Jovanovic JN, Czernik AJ, Fienberg AA, Greengard P, Sihra TS (2000) Synapsins as mediators of BDNF-enhanced neurotransmitter release. Nat Neurosci 3:323–329. Karst H, Berger S, Turiault M, Tronche F, Schutz G, Joels M (2005) Mineralocorticoid receptors are indispensable for nongenomic modulation of hippocampal glutamate transmission by corticosterone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:19204–19207. Kassel O, Sancono A, Kra¨tzschmar J, Kreft B, Stassen M, Cato AC (2001) Glucocorticoids inhibit MAP kinase via increased expression and decreased degradation of MKP-1. EMBO J 20:7108–7116. Kassel O, Herrlich P (2007) Crosstalk between the glucocorticoid receptor and other transcription factors: molecular aspects. Mol Cell Endocrinol 275:13–29. Kawashima H, Numakawa T, Kumamaru E, Adachi N, Mizuno H, Ninomiya M, Kunugi H, Hashido K (2010) Glucocorticoid attenuates brain-derived neurotrophic factor-dependent upregulation of glutamate receptors via the suppression of microRNA-132 expression. Neuroscience 165:1301–1311. Kim JJ, Diamond DM (2002) The stressed hippocampus, synaptic plasticity and lost memories. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:453–462. Kino T, Jaffe H, Amin ND, Chakrabarti M, Zheng YL, Chrousos GP, Pant HC (2010) Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 modulates the transcriptional activity of the mineralocorticoid receptor and regulates expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Mol Endocrinol 245:941–952. Kitchener P, Di Blasi F, Borrelli E, Piazza PV (2004) Differences between brain structures in nuclear translocation and DNA binding of the glucocorticoid receptor during stress and the circadian cycle. Eur J Neurosci 19:1837–1846. Kolber BJ, Wieczorek L, Muglia LJ (2008) HPA axis dysregulation and behavioral analysis of mouse mutants with altered GR or MR function. Stress 11:321–338. Korz V, Frey JU (2003) Stress-related modulation of hippocampal long-term potentiation in rats: involvement of adrenal steroid receptors. J Neurosci 23:7281–7287.

15

Kovalchuk Y, Hanse E, Kafitz KW, Konnerth A (2002) Postsynaptic induction of BDNF-mediated long-term potentiation. Science 295:1729–1734. Krama´r EA, Lin B, Lin CY, Arai AC, Gall CM, Lynch G (2004) A novel mechanism for the facilitation of theta-induced long-term potentiation by brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Neurosci 24:5151–5161. Kruk MR, Halasz J, Mellis W, Haller J (2004) Fast positive feedback between the adrenocortical stress response and a brain mechanism involved in aggressive behavior. Behav Neurosci 118:1062–1070. Kru¨ttgen A, Mo¨ller JC, Heymach Jr JV, Shooter EM (1998) Neurotrophins induce release of neurotrophins by the regulated secretory pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:9614–9619. Kuczewski N, Porcher C, Lessmann V, Medina I, Gaiarsa JL (2009) Activity-dependent dendritic release of BDNF and biological consequences. Mol Neurobiol 39:37–49. Kumamaru E, Numakawa T, Adachi N, Yagasaki Y, Izumi A, Niyaz M, Kudo M, Kunugi H (2008) Glucocorticoid prevents brain-derived neurotrophic factor-mediated maturation of synaptic function in developing hippocampal neurons through reduction in the activity of mitogen-activated protein kinase. Mol Endocrinol 22:546–558. Kumamaru E, Numakawa T, Adachi N, Kunugi H (2011) Glucocorticoid suppresses BDNF-stimulated MAPK/ERK pathway via inhibiting interaction of Shp2 with TrkB. FEBS Lett 585:3224–3228. Kunugi H, Hori H, Adachi N, Numakawa T (2010) Interface between hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in depression. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 64:447–459. Kutiyanawalla A, Terry Jr AV, Pillai A (2011) Cysteamine attenuates the decreases in TrkB protein levels and the anxiety/depressionlike behaviors in mice induced by corticosterone treatment. PLoS One 6:e26153. Kye MJ, Spiess J, Blank T (2007) Transcriptional regulation of intronic calcium-activated potassium channel SK2 promoters by nuclear factor-kappa B and glucocorticoids. Mol Cell Biochem 300:9–17. Lakshminarasimhan H, Chattarji S (2012) Stress leads to contrasting effects on the levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor in the hippocampus and amygdala. PLoS One 7:e30481. Lau AG, Irier HA, Gu J, Tian D, Ku L, Liu G, Xia M, Fritsch B, Zheng JQ, Dingledine R, Xu B, Lu B, Feng Y (2010) Distinct 30 UTRs differentially regulate activity-dependent translation of brainderived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:15945–15950. Lauterborn J, Berschauer R, Gall C (1995) Cell-specific modulation of basal and seizure-induced neurotrophin expression by adrenalectomy. Neuroscience 68:363–378. Lauterborn JC, Rivera S, Stinis CT, Hayes VY, Isackson PJ, Gall CM (1996) Differential effects of protein synthesis inhibition on the activity dependent expression of BDNF transcripts: evidence for immediate-early gene responses from specific promoters. J Neurosci 16:7428–7436. Lauterborn JC, Poulsen FR, Stinis CT, Isackson PJ, Gail CM (1998) Transcript-specific effects of adrenalectomy on seizure-induced BDNF expression in rat hippocampus. Mol Brain Res 55:81–91. Lawrence MS, Sapolsky RM (1994) Glucocorticoids accelerate ATP loss following metabolic insults in cultured hippocampal neurons. Brain Res 646:303–306. Lee CH, Yoo DY, Park OK, Park JH, Yi SS, Yoon YS, Won MH, Hwang IK (2012) Effects of adrenalectomy and replacement therapy of corticosterone on cell proliferation and neuroblast differentiation in the rat dentate gyrus. Neurochem Res 36:1767–1775. Lee J, Duan W, Mattson MP (2002) Evidence that brain-derived neurotrophic factor is required for basal neurogenesis and mediates, in part, the enhancement of neurogenesis by dietary restriction in the hippocampus of adult mice. J Neurochem 82:1367–1375. Lee R, Kermani P, Teng KK, Hempstead BL (2001) Regulation of cell survival by secreted proneurotrophins. Science 294:1945–1948.

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

16

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

Lee T, Saruta J, Sasaguri K, Sato S, Tsukinoki K (2008) Allowing animals to bite reverses the effects of immobilization stress on hippocampal neurotrophin expression. Brain Res 1195:43–49. Lee Y, Duman RS, Marek GJ (2006) The mGlu2/3 receptor agonist LY354740 suppresses immobilization stress-induced increase in rat prefrontal cortical BDNF mRNA expression. Neurosci Lett 398:328–332. Li X, Qiu J, Wang J, Zhong Y, Zhu J, Chen Y (2001) Corticosteroneinduced rapid phosphorylation of p38 and JNK mitogen-activated protein kinases in PC12 cells. FEBS Lett 492:210–214. Li XH, Liu NB, Zhang MH, Zhou YL, Liao JW, Liu XQ, Chen HW (2007) Effects of chronic multiple stress on learning and memory and the expression of Fyn, BDNF, TrkB in the hippocampus of rats. Chin Med J (Engl) 120:669–674. Li Y, Luikart BW, Birnbaum S, Chen J, Kwon CH, Kernie SG, BasselDuby R, Parada LF (2008) TrkB regulates hippocampal neurogenesis and governs sensitivity to antidepressive treatment. Neuron 59:399–412. Lipsky RH, Marini AM (2007) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in neuronal survival and behavior-related plasticity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1122:130–143. Liu QR, Walther D, Drgon T, Polesskaya O, Lesnick TG, Strain KJ, de Andrade M, Bower JH, Maraganore DM, Uhl GR (2005) Human brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) genes, splicing patterns, and assessments of associations with substance abuse and Parkinson’s disease. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 134:93–103. Liu W, Yuen EY, Yan Z (2010) The stress hormone corticosterone increases synaptic alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors via serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase (SGK) regulation of the GDIRab4 complex. J Biol Chem 285:6101–6108. Liston C, Gan WB (2011) Glucocorticoids are critical regulators of dendritic spine development and plasticity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:16074–16079. Losel R, Wehling M (2003) Nongenomic actions of steroid hormones. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:46–56. Lu B (2003) Pro-region of neurotrophins: role in synaptic modulation. Neuron 39:735–738. Lu Y, Christian K, Lu B (2008) BDNF: a key regulator for protein synthesis-dependent LTP and long-term memory? Neurobiol Learn Mem 89:312–323. Ma XM, Camacho C, Aguilera G (2001) Regulation of corticotropinreleasing hormone (CRH) transcription and CRH mRNA stability by glucocorticoids. Cell Mol Neurobiol 21:465–475. MacPherson A, Dinkel K, Sapolsky R (2005) Glucocorticoids worsen excitotoxin-induced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in hippocampal cultures. Exp Neurol 194:376–383. Manetsch M, Ramsay EE, King EM, Seidel P, Che W, Ge Q, Hibbs DE, Newton R, Ammit AJ (2012) Corticosteroids and b(2)-agonists upregulate mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase 1: in vitro mechanisms. Br J Pharmacol 166:2049–2059. Marmige`re F, Givalois L, Rage F, Arancibia S, Tapia-Arancibia L (2003) Rapid induction of BDNF expression in the hippocampus during immobilization stress challenge in adult rats. Hippocampus 13:646–655. Mattson MP, Lovell MA, Furukawa K, Markesbery WR (1995) Neurotrophic factors attenuate glutamate-induced accumulation of peroxides, elevation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration, and neurotoxicity and increase antioxidant enzyme activities in hippocampal neurons. J Neurochem 65:1740–1751. McArthur S, Yazid S, Christian H, Sirha R, Flower R, Buckingham J, Solito E (2009) Annexin A1 regulates hormone exocytosis through a mechanism involving actin reorganization. FASEB J 23: 4000–4010. McCullers DL, Herman JP (1998) Mineralocorticoid receptors regulate bcl-2 and p53 mRNA expression in hippocampus. Neuroreport 9:3085–3089. McEwen BS (2008) Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease: understanding the protective and damaging effects of stress and stress mediators. Eur J Pharmacol 583:174–185.

Michaelsen K, Zagrebelsky M, Berndt-Huch J, Polack M, Buschler A, Sendtner M, Korte M (2010) Neurotrophin receptors TrkB.T1 and p75NTR cooperate in modulating both functional and structural plasticity in mature hippocampal neurons. Eur J Neurosci 32: 1854–1865. Miller FD, Kaplan DR (2001) Neurotrophin signalling pathways regulating neuronal apoptosis. Cell Mol Life Sci 58:1045–1053. Minichiello L, Korte M, Wolfer D, Kuhn R, Unsicker K, Cestari V, Rossi-Arnaud C, Lipp HP, Bonhoeffer T, Klein R (1999) Essential role for TrkB receptors in hippocampus-mediated learning. Neuron 24:401–414. Minichiello L (2009) TrkB signalling pathways in LTP and learning. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:850–860. Molteni R, Calabrese F, Cattaneo A, Mancini M, Gennarelli M, Racagni G, Riva MA (2009) Acute stress responsiveness of the neurotrophin BDNF in the rat hippocampus is modulated by chronic treatment with the antidepressant duloxetine. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:1523–1532. Molteni R, Calabrese F, Chourbaji S, Brandwein C, Racagni G, Gass P, Riva MA (2010) Depression-prone mice with reduced glucocorticoid receptor expression display an altered stressdependent regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein. J Psychopharmacol 24:595–603. Munhoz CD, Sorrells SF, Caso JR, Scavone C, Sapolsky RM (2010) Glucocorticoids exacerbate lipopolysaccharide-induced signaling in the frontal cortex and hippocampus in a dose-dependent manner. J Neurosci 30:13690–13698. Murakami S, Imbe H, Morikawa Y, Kubo C, Senba E (2005) Chronic stress, as well as acute stress, reduces BDNF mRNA expression in the rat hippocampus but less robustly. Neurosci Res 53:129–139. Nagano M, Liu M, Inagaki H, Kawada T, Suzuki H (2012) Early intervention with fluoxetine reverses abnormalities in the serotonergic system and behavior of rats exposed prenatally to dexamethasone. Neuropharmacology 63:292–300. Nair A, Vadodaria KC, Banerjee SB, Benekareddy M, Dias BG, Duman RS, Vaidya VA (2007) Stressor-specific regulation of distinct brain-derived neurotrophic factor transcripts and cyclic AMP response element-binding protein expression in the postnatal and adult rat hippocampus. Neuropsychopharmacology 32:1504–1519. Neeley EW, Berger R, Koenig JI, Leonard S (2011) Strain dependent effects of prenatal stress on gene expression in the rat hippocampus. Physiol Behav 104:334–339. Nibuya M, Takahashi M, Russell DS, Duman RS (1999) Repeated stress increases catalytic TrkB mRNA in rat hippocampus. Neurosci Lett 267:81–84. Nicoletti-Carvalho JE, Lellis-Santos C, Yamanaka TS, Nogueira TC, Caperuto LC, Leite AR, Anheˆ GF, Bordin S (2010) MKP-1 mediates glucocorticoid-induced ERK1/2 dephosphorylation and reduction in pancreatic b-cell proliferation in islets from early lactating mothers. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 299: 1006–1015. Nitta A, Ohmiya M, Sometani A, Itoh M, Nomoto H, Furukawa Y, Furukawa S (1999) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor prevents neuronal cell death induced by corticosterone. J Neurosci Res 57:227–235. Numakawa T, Kumamaru E, Adachi N, Yagasaki Y, Izumi A, Kunugi H (2009) Glucocorticoid receptor interaction with TrkB promotes BDNF-triggered PLC-gamma signaling for glutamate release via a glutamate transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:647–652. Oe S, Yoneda Y (2010) Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-like sequences are involved in dendritic targeting of BDNF mRNA in hippocampal neurons. FEBS Lett 584:3424–3430. Oitzl MS, de Kloet ER (1992) Selective corticosteroid antagonists modulate specific aspects of spatial orientation learning. Behav Neurosci 106:62–71. Osterlund CD, Jarvis E, Chadayammuri A, Unnithan R, Weiser MJ, Spencer RL (2011) Tonic, but not phasic corticosterone, constrains stress activated extracellular-regulated-kinase 1/2

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx immunoreactivity within the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. J Neuroendocrinol 23:1241–1251. Pang PT, Teng HK, Zaitsev E, Woo NT, Sakata K, Zhen S, Teng KK, Yung WH, Hempstead BL, Lu B (2004) Cleavage of proBDNF by tPA/plasmin is essential for long-term hippocampal plasticity. Science 306:487–491. Pavlides C, Watanabe Y, McEwen BS (1993) Effects of glucocorticoids on hippocampal long-term potentiation. Hippocampus 3:183–192. Pavlides C, Ogawa S, Kimura A, McEwen BS (1996) Role of adrenal steroid mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors in longterm potentiation in the CA1 field of hippocampal slices. Brain Res 738:229–235. Poo MM (2001) Neurotrophins as synaptic modulators. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:24–32. Prager EM, Johnson LR (2009) Stress at the synapse: signal transduction mechanisms of adrenal steroids at neuronal membranes. Sci Signal 2:re5. Qi AQ, Qiu J, Xiao L, Chen YZ (2005) Rapid activation of JNK and p38 by glucocorticoids in primary cultured hippocampal cells. J Neurosci Res 80:510–517. Radecki DT, Brown LM, Martinez J, Teyler TJ (2005) BDNF protects against stress-induced impairments in spatial learning and memory and LTP. Hippocampus 15:246–253. Radley JJ, Sawchenko PE (2011) A common substrate for prefrontal and hippocampal inhibition of the neuroendocrine stress response. J Neurosci 31:9683–9695. Ramdas J, Harmon JM (1998) Glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis and regulation of NF-kappaB activity in human leukemic T cells. Endocrinology 139:3813–3821. Reichardt HM, Umland T, Bauer A, Kretz O, Schutz G (2000) Mice with an increased glucocorticoid receptor gene dosage show enhanced resistance to stress and endotoxic shock. Mol Cell Biol 20:9009–9017. Reichardt LF (2006) Neurotrophin-regulated signaling pathways. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361:1545–1564. Reul JM, de Kloet ER (1985) Two receptor systems for corticosterone in rat brain: microdistribution and differential occupation. Endocrinology 117:2505–2511. Ridder S, Chourbaji S, Hellweg R, Urani A, Zacher C, Schmid W, Zink M, Ho¨rtnagl H, Flor H, Henn FA, Schu¨tz G, Gass P (2005) Mice with genetically altered glucocorticoid receptor expression show altered sensitivity for stress-induced depressive reactions. J Neurosci 25:6243–6250. Rose CR, Blum R, Pichler B, Lepier A, Kafitz KW, Konnerth A (2003) Truncated TrkB-T1 mediates neurotrophin-evoked calcium signalling in glia cells. Nature 426:74–78. Roskoden T, Otten U, Schwegler H (2004) Early postnatal corticosterone administration regulates neurotrophins and their receptors in septum and hippocampus of the rat. Exp Brain Res 154:183–191. Rothman SM, Herdener N, Camandola S, Texel SJ, Mughal MR, Cong WN, Martin B, Mattson MP (2012) 3xTgAD mice exhibit altered behavior and elevated Ab after chronic mild social stress. Neurobiol Aging 33:830.e1–830.e12. Roux PP, Barker PA (2002) Neurotrophin signaling through the p75 neurotrophin receptor. Prog Neurobiol 67:203–233. Roy M, Sapolsky RM (2003) The exacerbation of hippocampal excitotoxicity by glucocorticoids is not mediated by apoptosis. Neuroendocrinology 77:24–31. Sairanen M, Lucas G, Ernfors P, Castren M, Castren E (2005) Brainderived neurotrophic factor and antidepressant drugs have different but coordinated effects on neuronal turnover, proliferation, and survival in the adult dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 25:1089–1094. Sapolsky RM, Uno H, Rebert CS, Finch CE (1990) Hippocampal damage associated with prolonged glucocorticoid exposure in primates. J Neurosci 10:2897–2902. Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU (2000) How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev 21:55–89.

17

Sandi C, Loscertales M, Guaza C (1997) Experience-dependent facilitating effect of corticosterone on spatial memory formation in the water maze. Eur J Neurosci 9:637–642. Sandi C, Pinelo-Nava MT (2007) Stress and memory: behavioral effects and neurobiological mechanisms. Neural Plast 2007:78970. Sasaguri K, Kikuchi M, Hori N, Yuyama N, Onozuka M, Sato S (2005) Suppression of stress immobilization-induced phosphorylation of ERK 1/2 by biting in the rat hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Neurosci Lett 383:160–164. Schaaf MJ, Hoetelmans RWM, de Kloet ER, Vreugdenhil E (1997) Corticosterone regulates expression of BDNF and trkB but not NT-3 and trkC mRNA in the rat hippocampus. J Neurosci Res 48:334–341. Schaaf MJM, de Jong J, de Kloet ER, Vreugdenhil E (1998) Downregulation of BDNF mRNA and protein in the rat hippocampus by corticosterone. Brain Res 813:112–120. Scharfman H, Goodman J, Macleod A, Phani S, Antonelli C, Croll S (2005) Increased neurogenesis and the ectopic granule cells after intrahippocampal BDNF infusion in adult rats. Exp Neurol 192:348–356. Schmidt HD, Duman RS (2007) The role of neurotrophic factors in adult hippocampal neurogenesis, antidepressant treatments and animal models of depressive-like behavior. Behav Pharmacol 18:391–418. Schoenfeld TJ, Gould E (2012) Stress, stress hormones, and adult neurogenesis. Exp Neurol 233:12–21. Schulte-Herbru¨ggen O, Chourbaji S, Ridder S, Brandwein C, Gass P, Ho¨rtnagl H, Hellweg R (2006) Stress-resistant mice overexpressing glucocorticoid receptors display enhanced BDNF in the amygdala and hippocampus with unchanged NGF and serotonergic function. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31:1266–1277. Schulte-Herbru¨ggen O, Hellweg R, Chourbaji S, Ridder S, Brandwein C, Gass P, Ho¨rtnagl H (2007) Differential regulation of neurotrophins and serotonergic function in mice with genetically reduced glucocorticoid receptor expression. Exp Neurol 204:307–316. Seidah NG, Benjannet S, Pareek S, Chretien M, Murphy RA (1996) Cellular processing of the neurotrophin precursors of NT3 and BDNF by the mammalian proprotein convertases. FEBS Lett 379:247–250. Shah OJ, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS (2000) Among translational effectors, p70S6k is uniquely sensitive to inhibition by glucocorticoids. Biochem J 347:389–397. Shao SH, Shi SS, Li ZL, Zhao MS, Xie SY, Pan F (2010) Aging effects on the BDNF mRNA and TrkB mRNA expression of the hippocampus in different durations of stress. Chin J Physiol 53:285–293. Sherrard RM, Dixon KJ, Bakouche J, Rodger J, Lemaigre-Dubreuil Y, Mariani J (2009) Differential expression of TrkB isoforms switches climbing fiber-Purkinje cell synaptogenesis to selective synapse elimination. Dev Neurobiol 69:647–662. Shi SS, Shao SH, Yuan BP, Pan F, Li ZL (2010) Acute stress and chronic stress change brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and tyrosine kinase-coupled receptor (TrkB) expression in both young and aged rat hippocampus. Yonsei Med J 51:661–671. Shieh PB, Hu SC, Bobb K, Timmusk T, Ghosh A (1998) Identification of a signaling pathway involved in calcium regulation of BDNF expression. Neuron 20:727–740. Shirayama Y, Chen AC, Nakagawa S, Russell DS, Duman RS (2002) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor produces antidepressant effects in behavioral models of depression. J Neurosci 22:3251–3261. Sloviter RS, Valiquette G, Abrams GM, Ronk EC, Sollas AL, Paul LA, Neubort S (1989) Selective loss of hippocampal granule cells in the mature rat brain after adrenalectomy. Science 243:535–538. Smith MA, Makino S, Kim SY, Kvetnansky R (1995a) Stress increases brain-derived neurotropic factor messenger ribonucleic acid in the hypothalamus and pituitary. Endocrinology 136:3743–3750. Smith MA, Makino S, Kvetnansky R, Post RM (1995b) Stress and glucocorticoids affect the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic

Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065

18

D. Suri, V. A. Vaidya / Neuroscience xxx (2012) xxx–xxx

factor and neurotrophin-3 mRNAs in the hippocampus. J Neurosci 15:1768–1777. Smith MA (1996) Hippocampal vulnerability to stress and aging: possible role of neurotrophic factors. Behav Brain Res 78:25–36. Sousa N, Lukoyanov NV, Madeira MD, Almeida OF, Paula-Barbosa MM (2000) Reorganization of the morphology of hippocampal neurites and synapses after stress-induced damage correlates with behavioral improvement. Neuroscience 97:253–266. Stauber C, Altschmied J, Akerblom IE, Marron JL, Mellon PL (1992) Mutual cross-interference between glucocorticoid receptor and CREB inhibits transactivation in placental cells. New Biol 4:527–540. Stein-Behrens BA, Elliott EM, Miller CA, Schilling JW, Newcombe R, Sapolsky RM (1992) Glucocorticoids exacerbate kainic acidinduced extracellular accumulation of excitatory amino acids in the rat hippocampus. J Neurochem 58:1730–1735. Strohmaier C, Carter BD, Urfer R, Barde YA, Dechant G (1996) A splice variant of the neurotrophin receptor trkB with increased specificity for brain-derived neurotrophic factor. EMBO J 15:3332–3337. Tao X, Finkbeiner S, Arnold DB, Shaywitz AJ, Greenberg ME (1998) Ca2+ influx regulates BDNF transcription by a CREB family transcription factor-dependent mechanism. Neuron 20:709–726. Tao X, West AE, Chen WG, Corfas G, Greenberg ME (2002) A calcium-responsive transcription factor, CaRF, that regulates neuronal activity-dependent expression of BDNF. Neuron 33:383–395. Tardito D, Perez J, Tiraboschi E, Musazzi L, Racagni G, Popoli M (2006) Signaling pathways regulating gene expression, neuroplasticity, and neurotrophic mechanisms in the action of antidepressants: a critical overview. Pharmacol Rev 58:115–134. Teng HK, Teng KK, Lee R, Wright S, Tevar S, Almeida RD, Kermani P, Torkin R, Chen ZY, Lee FS, Kraemer RT, Nykjaer A, Hempstead BL (2005) ProBDNF induces neuronal apoptosis via activation of a receptor complex of p75NTR and sortilin. J Neurosci 25:5455–5463. Thomas K, Davies A (2005) Neurotrophins: a ticket to ride for BDNF. Curr Biol 15:262–264. Timmusk T, Palm K, Metsis M, Reintam T, Paalme V, Saarma M, Persson H (1993) Multiple promoters direct tissue-specific expression of the rat BDNF gene. Neuron 10:475–489. Timmusk T, Lendahl U, Funakoshi H, Arenas E, Persson H, Metsis M (1995) Identification of brain-derived neurotrophic factor promoter regions mediating tissue-specific, axotomy-, and neuronal activity-induced expression in transgenic mice. J Cell Biol 128:185–199. Touma C, Bunck M, Glasl L, Nussbaumer M, Palme R, Stein H, Wolfersta¨tter M, Zeh R, Zimbelmann M, Holsboer F, Landgraf R (2008) Mice selected for high versus low stress reactivity: a new animal model for affective disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33:839–862. Trapp T, Rupprecht R, Castre´n M, Reul JM, Holsboer F (1994) Heterodimerization between mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptor: a new principle of glucocorticoid action in the CNS. Neuron 13:1457–1462. Tsankova NM, Berton O, Renthal W, Kumar A, Neve RL, Nestler EJ (2006) Sustained hippocampal chromatin regulation in a mouse model of depression and antidepressant action. Nat Neurosci 9:519–525. Tyler WJ, Alonso M, Bramham CR, Pozzo-Miller LD (2002) From acquisition to consolidation: on the role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling in hippocampal-dependent learning. Learn Mem 9:224–237. Ueyama T, Kawai Y, Nemoto K, Sekimoto M, Tone´ S, Senba E (1997) Immobilization stress reduced the expression of neurotrophins and their receptors in the rat brain. Neurosci Res 28:103–110.

Unlap T, Jope RS (1994) Dexamethasone attenuates kainateinduced AP-1 activation in rat brain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 24:275–282. Uno H, Tarara R, Else JG, Suleman MA, Sapolsky RM (1989) Hippocampal damage associated with prolonged and fatal stress in primates. J Neurosci 9:1705–1711. Vaidya VA, Marek GJ, Aghajanian GK, Duman RS (1997) 5-HT2A receptor-mediated regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in the hippocampus and the neocortex. J Neurosci 17:2785–2795. Vellucci SV, Parrott RF, Mimmack ML (2001) Down-regulation of BDNF mRNA, with no effect on trkB or glucocorticoid receptor m RNAs, in the porcine hippocampus after acute dexamethasone treatment. Res Vet Sci 70:157–162. Vellucci SV, Parrott RF, Mimmack ML (2002) Chronic dexamethasonetreatment alters mineralocorticoid receptor, truncated trkB and selected glutamate receptor subunit mRNA expression in the porcine hippocampus. Neuropeptides 36:291–298. Vidaurre OG, Gasco´n S, Deogracias R, Sobrado M, Cuadrado E, Montaner J, Rodrı´ guez-Pen˜a A, Dı´ az-Guerra M (2012) Imbalance of neurotrophin receptor isoforms TrkB-FL/TrkB-T1 induces neuronal death in excitotoxicity. Cell Death Dis 3:e256. Virgin Jr CE, Ha TP, Packan DR, Tombaugh GC, Yang SH, Horner HC, Sapolsky RM (1991) Glucocorticoids inhibit glucose transport and glutamate uptake in hippocampal astrocytes: implications for glucocorticoid neurotoxicity. J Neurochem 57:1422–1428. Wei Q, Lu XY, Liu L, Schafer G, Shieh KR, Burke S, Robinson TE, Watson SJ, Seasholtz AF, Akil H (2004) Glucocorticoid receptor overexpression in forebrain: a mouse model of increased emotional lability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:11851–11856. Wu YC, Williamson R, Li Z, Vicario A, Xu J, Kasai M, Chern Y, Tongiorgi E, Baraban JM (2011) Dendritic trafficking of brainderived neurotrophic factor mRNA: regulation by translindependent and -independent mechanisms. J Neurochem 116:1112–1121. Yang CH, Huang CC, Hsu KS (2004) Behavioral stress modifies hippocampal synaptic plasticity through corticosterone-induced sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. J Neurosci 24:11029–11034. Yang J, Siao CJ, Nagappan G, Marinic T, Jing D, McGrath K, Chen ZY, Mark W, Tessarollo L, Lee FS, Lu B, Hempstead BL (2009) Neuronal release of proBDNF. Nat Neurosci 12:113–115. Yoshii A, Constantine-Paton M (2010) Postsynaptic BDNF-TrkB signaling in synapse maturation, plasticity, and disease. Dev Neurobiol 70:304–322. Zanchi NE, Filho MA, Felitti V, Nicastro H, Lorenzeti FM, Lancha Jr AH (2010) Glucocorticoids: extensive physiological actions modulated through multiple mechanisms of gene regulation. J Cell Physiol 224:311–315. Zhang TY, Daynes RA (2007) Glucocorticoid conditioning of myeloid progenitors enhances TLR4 signaling via negative regulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt pathway. J Immunol 178:2517–2526. Zhang R, Packard BA, Tauchi M, D’Alessio DA, Herman JP (2009) Glucocorticoid regulation of preproglucagon transcription and RNA stability during stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:5913–5918. Zhang Y, Gu F, Chen J, Dong W (2010) Chronic antidepressant administration alleviates frontal and hippocampal BDNF deficits in CUMS rat. Brain Res 1366:141–148. Zhou J, Zhang F, Zhang Y (2000) Corticosterone inhibits generation of long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slice: involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Brain Res 885:182–191. Zhou Y, Ling EA, Dheen ST (2007) Dexamethasone suppresses monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 production via mitogen activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 dependent inhibition of Jun N-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in activated rat microglia. J Neurochem 102:667–678.

(Accepted 30 August 2012) (Available online xxxx) Please cite this article in press as: Suri D, Vaidya VA. Glucocorticoid regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor: Relevance to hippocampal structural and functional plasticity. Neuroscience (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.065