Gyral and Sulcal Cortical Thinning in Adolescents with First Episode Early-Onset Psychosis

Gyral and Sulcal Cortical Thinning in Adolescents with First Episode Early-Onset Psychosis

Gyral and Sulcal Cortical Thinning in Adolescents with First Episode Early-Onset Psychosis Joost Janssen, Santiago Reig, Yasser Alemán, Hugo Schnack, ...

653KB Sizes 0 Downloads 64 Views

Gyral and Sulcal Cortical Thinning in Adolescents with First Episode Early-Onset Psychosis Joost Janssen, Santiago Reig, Yasser Alemán, Hugo Schnack, J. M. Udias, Mara Parellada, Montserrat Graell, Dolores Moreno, Arantzazu Zabala, Evan Balaban, Manuel Desco, and Celso Arango Background: Psychosis is associated with volumetric decreases of cortical structures. Whether these volumetric decreases imply abnormalities in cortical thickness, surface, or cortical folding is not clear. Due to differences in cytoarchitecture, cortical gyri and sulci might be differentially affected by psychosis. Therefore, we examined differences in gyral and sulcal cortical thickness, surface, folding, and volume between a minimally treated male adolescent population with early-onset first-episode psychosis (EOP) and a healthy control group, with surface-based morphometry. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging brain scans were obtained from 49 adolescent EOP patients and 34 healthy control subjects. Subjects were younger than 18 years (age range 12 years–18 years), and EOP patients had a duration of positive symptoms of ⬍6 months. Results: Early-onset first-episode psychosis was associated with local bilateral cortical thinning and volume deficits in both the gyri and sulci of the superior temporal cortex and the inferior, middle, medial, and superior prefrontal cortex. In the pars triangularis and opercularis cortex of patients, gyral cortical thickness was thinner, whereas sulcal thickness was not. Patients exhibited cortical thinning together with a decreased degree of cortical folding in the right superior frontal cortex. Conclusions: Cortical thinning of both gyri and sulci seem to underlie most cortical volume deficits in adolescent patients with EOP. Except for the right superior frontal region, the degree of cortical folding was normal in regions showing decreased cortical thickness, suggesting that the process of cortical thinning in adolescent patients with EOP primarily takes place after the formation of cortical folds. Key Words: Adolescence, cortical folding, cortical thickness, magnetic resonance imaging, psychosis, surface-based morphometry, volume

A

dult-onset psychosis is associated with structural brain abnormalities such as volume deficits (1), cortical thinning (2,3), abnormal folding of the cortex (4), and more shallow sulci (5). In adolescents, investigation of the relationship between psychosis and brain structure benefits from minimal confounding from factors such as extensive medicinal treatment and substance abuse. In adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia (all patients had more than 6 months of disease duration), regional cortical volume deficits have been reported (6 –10). Changes in cortical thickness, surface area, and/or cortical folding might underlie these volume deficits. In addition, cortical folds are made up of gyral hills and sulcal valleys that are different in cytoarchitecture in the normal human brain (11). These cytoarchitectural differences might affect disease-related cortical thinning (12). It is therefore of interest to determine whether decreased cortical thickness, if present, affects both gyri and sulci. Finally, the gyri and sulci mostly develop prenatally (13); if From the Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery (JJ, SR, YA, MD); Adolescent Unit (JJ, SR, YA, MP, DM, AZ, CA), Department of Psychiatry, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, CIBERSAM; Grupo de Física Nuclear (JMU), Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad Complutense de Madrid; Department of Psychiatry (MG), Hospital Universitario Infantil Niño Jesus, Madrid; Psychiatry Section (AZ), Neuroscience (UPV-EHU), University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain; Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience (HS), Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; and the Behavioral Neurosciences Program (EB), McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Address correspondence to Joost Janssen, Ph.D., Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Department of Experimental Medicine, Surgery and Psychiatry, Adolescent Unit, C/Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain; E-mail: [email protected]. Received Mar 31, 2009; revised Jul 10, 2009; accepted Jul 19, 2009.

0006-3223/09/$36.00 doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.07.021

an abnormal degree of folding of the cortex is present in areas of decreased cortical thickness, then this might indicate that cortical thinning is associated with early stages of cortical development. Previous reports have shown decreased cortical thickness in medial frontal areas in schizophrenic children with a history of poor antipsychotic treatment response (14,15). A recent study demonstrated widespread decreased cortical thickness, particularly in the superior temporal and prefrontal cortex, in adolescent patients with schizophrenia (16). Concerning cortical folding, most reports describe a decrease in adult and adolescent patients with psychosis (4,17–19). However, to the best of our knowledge, we do not know of a published study that has directly combined measurements of gyral and sulcal cortical thickness, surface area, the degree of cortical folding, and volume, all made within the same adolescent patients with psychosis. Therefore, we used surface-based morphometry (SBM) in a large sample of adolescents with a first-episode early-onset psychosis (EOP) and healthy control subjects, all male and younger than 18 years of age. The EOP patients had a duration of positive symptoms of ⬍6 months, which minimized confounding from gender, treatment, and disease duration. We sought to compare gyral and sulcal thickness, surface, the degree of cortical folding, and volume between groups.

Methods and Materials Sample The total sample included 83 male subjects (49 patients and 34 healthy control subjects). The patients were recruited from the two child and adolescent psychiatry inpatient units in Madrid (Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón and Hospital Universitario Infantil Niño Jesus). These two units serve a population of approximately five million people. All male patients consecutively seen at these facilities between April 2002 and November 2005 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria described in the following text were invited to participate in the study. Fifty-eight patients were eligible for the study; however, 7 BIOL PSYCHIATRY 2009;66:1047–1054 © 2009 Society of Biological Psychiatry

1048 BIOL PSYCHIATRY 2009;66:1047–1054 patients refused a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan because of fear. Furthermore, 2 subjects were excluded because of insufficient image quality for neuroimaging analyses, leaving a sample of 49 patients. The inclusion criteria for patients were male gender and presence of positive psychotic symptoms before the age of 18 years (within a DSM-IV diagnosis) for ⬍6 months at the time of assessment on enrollment in the study. Exclusion criteria were presence of a concomitant Axis I disorder, mental retardation, a pervasive developmental disorder, neurological diseases, or a history of head trauma with loss of consciousness. All patients had a thorough medical examination as part of our standard clinical guidelines protocol. Patients with substance abuse and/or dependence were generally excluded; however, those with substance use who continued to show positive symptoms after 14 days of a negative urine drug screen were retained. Thirty-four healthy control subjects were recruited from the same schools and residential areas as the patients. The inclusion criteria for control subjects were male; age similar to patients; and absence of psychiatric and/or neurological disorders or a family history of an Axis I or Axis II diagnosis, head trauma, or mental retardation. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of both participating clinical centers. After the study was thoroughly explained to the subjects, written informed consent was obtained from both the legal representatives and the patients. All the subjects met MRI safety criteria. Clinical Assessment All patients met DSM-IV criteria for a first episode of psychosis, assessed with the Kiddie-SADS-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) (20). Control subjects were also assessed with the K-SADS-PL to rule out current and previous illness. Clinical diagnostic interviews were performed during the initial hospitalization by four experienced psychiatrists trained in this interview. Diagnostic consensus was reached in cases where presence or absence of psychiatric diagnoses was in doubt. Psychotic symptoms were assessed with the validated Spanish version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (21). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (22) for the four psychiatrists who administered the scale ranged from .72 to .96. The parental socioeconomic status was measured with the HollingsheadRedlich scale (23). Stability of Diagnosis The age at onset of psychosis was defined as the age at which the patient experienced positive psychotic symptoms for the first time (delusions or hallucinations of any kind that qualify for a DSM-IV diagnosis) (Supplement 1). This information was gathered during the K-SADS interview with parents or legal guardians present. Duration of psychosis was defined as the time between age at onset of psychosis and scan acquisition. Duration of treatment was defined as the time between initiation of antipsychotic treatment and scan acquisition. Medication At the time of the baseline assessment, all patients were taking antipsychotic medication. Eighty percent (n ⫽ 39) of the sample (n ⫽ 49) were receiving only one antipsychotic, and the other 20% (n ⫽ 10) were receiving two antipsychotics simultaneously. With the exception of two cases, patients were receiving a second-generation antipsychotic. Distribution of the antipsychotic treatment was as follows: 51% (n ⫽ 25) risperidone, 33% www.sobp.org/journal

J. Janssen et al. Table 1. Demographic and Clinical Variables of the 49 Male Patients with First-Episode EOP and the 34 Male Healthy Control Subjects

Age (Range) Handedness (r/l/ambidexter)a IQb (Range) Level of Education (Yrs) Parental Socioeconomic Statusc Age at Onset of Psychosis (Yrs)d (Range) Duration of Psychosis (Weeks)ef (Range) Duration of Treatment (Weeks)g (Range) CPE PANSS Positive symptoms Negative symptoms General psychopathology

EOP n ⫽ 49

Control Subjects n ⫽ 34

15.8 (1.5) (12–18) 42/4/0 89 (17) (70–134) 8.5 2.7

15.1 (1.7) (12–17) 26/4/1 98 (16) (73–129) 8.5 2.9

15.4 (1.5) (10–17) 12.0 (9.0) (0–24) 2.3 (2.0) (0–11) 401.05 (782.62) 25.6 (5.4) 22.7 (7.0) 48.7 (9.6)

Values are mean (SD) for continuous variables. EOP, early-onset psychosis; CPE, chlorpromazine equivalents; PANSS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. a Missing data for six subjects. b The IQ was estimated by the cubes and vocabulary tests that are part of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III/Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. c Parental socioeconomic status was measured with the HollingsheadRedlich scale. d Age at onset of psychosis was defined as the age at which positive symptoms appeared for the first time. e Missing data for one subject. f Duration of psychosis was defined as the time between first appearance of positive symptoms and scan acquisition. g Duration of treatment was defined as the time between start of antipsychotic treatment and scan acquisition.

(n ⫽ 16) quetiapine, 29% (n ⫽ 14) olanzapine, 4% (n ⫽ 2) ziprasidone, and 4% (n ⫽ 2) haloperidol. The chlorpromazine equivalent dose (CPE) (24,25) was calculated from the dose of antipsychotics received (Table 1). The mean daily antipsychotic dose in chlorpromazine equivalents was 401.05 mg ⫾ 782.62 mg. Estimation of IQ See Supplement 1. MRI Acquisition All participants were scanned on a 1.5-T Philips MRI scanner (Philips Gyroscan; Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). Two MR sequences were applied to all the participants: a T1-weighted, 3-dimensional, gradient echo scan with 100 1.5-mm contiguous axial slices (echo time [TE], 4.6 msec; repetition time [TR], 9.3 msec; flip angle, 30°; field of view (FOV), 256 mm; and in-plane voxel size, .98 mm ⫻ .98 mm) and a T2-weighted Turbo Spin Echo scan with 3.5-mm contiguous axial slices (turbo factor, 15; TE, 120 msec; TR, 5809 msec; FOV, 256 mm; and in-plane voxel size, .98 mm ⫻ .98 mm). Both T1- and T2-weighted images were used for clinical neurodiagnostic evaluation by an independent neuroradiologist. No participants showed clinically significant brain pathology. The cortical surface reconstruction algorithms we employed during SBM analysis (see following) are computer-intensive. The cortical surface reconstructions were performed in parallel on a Linux cluster composed of 24 SUN V20z nodes, each of them with two dual core AMD Opteron

J. Janssen et al. 270 operating at 2.0 GHz. Each node had 8 Gbp of RAM, making a total of 192 Gbp of RAM and 96 computing cores. Image Analysis SBM. Volume-based neuroimaging studies assessing the cortex usually express the results in units of cortical volume, which cannot be separated into thickness and surface. Voxelbased morphometry suffers the same limitation and results in probabilities of cortical gray matter volume, which might be hard to interpret. Surface-based morphometry resolves this limitation, measuring cortical gray matter volume in millimeters cubed and its constituent parameters, cortical thickness in millimeters and surface area in millimeters squared. Gyral and Sulcal Cortical Thickness, Surface, Volume. For each subject, cortical thickness was estimated as the distance in millmeters between the white matter (gray/white boundary) and gray matter (gray/cerebrospinal fluid boundary) cortical surface (26). The white and gray cortical surfaces were reconstructed from the raw unaligned images in native space, with the methods described by Fischl and Dale (26) and Dale et al. (27), as implemented in the FreeSurfer software package (version 4.0.5, http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu). The reconstruction process was supervised and corrected when necessary by an operator blind to the subject’s diagnosis. The reconstruction procedure was repeated until accurate white and gray surfaces were obtained. For each subject, the total intracranial volume was also estimated as described by Buckner et al. (28). The reconstructed surfaces enabled calculation of cortical thickness, surface area, and regional gray matter volume at every vertex (i.e., surface point) with methods developed by Fischl and Dale (26). For each subject, the cortical surface was separated into gyri and sulci by thresholding the cortical surface curvature values (Figure 1). The curvature threshold was fixed at 0, the surface point of inflexion

Figure 1. (A) The inflated right hemisphere of the study-specific average gray matter surface template overlayed with a thresholded curvature map. The curvature threshold was fixed at 0, the surface point of inflexion between gyri and sulci (dark gray). This is the point where the cortical surface passed from convex to concave or vice versa. Sulci contain, effectively, both sulcal wall and fundus. The superior frontal cluster (red) in which cortical thinning in 49 male adolescent patients with first episode early-onset psychosis compared with 34 male control subjects after correction for multiple comparisons and controlling for age was detected (see Results). (B) On the basis of the thresholded curvature map, the cluster of cortical thinning was divided in a sulcal (blue) and gyral (yellow) region. Thereafter, we compared mean sulcal and gyral cortical thickness between patients and control subjects (see Results). Idem for the other clusters where cortical thinning was detected.

BIOL PSYCHIATRY 2009;66:1047–1054 1049 between gyri and sulci. This is the point where the cortical surface passed from convex to concave or vice versa. Effectively, sulci contain both sulcal wall and fundus. Normalizing and Automatic Labeling of Gyri and Sulci. Before statistical analysis, all cortical surfaces were normalized from native space into Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space (29). In addition, for accurate localization of the results, a left and right hemispheric study-specific average gray matter surface template was created. To obtain this template, the normalized cortical surfaces of all control subjects and patients were automatically labeled into 32 regions with a Bayesian segmentation procedure designed to replicate the neuroanatomical labeling described by Desikan et al. (30). Thereafter, the gray matter surfaces and cortical labels from all the subjects were averaged to create the left and right studyspecific average gray matter surface template, labeled into the 32 regions. Before averaging, the accuracy of the labeling was checked in native space and manually edited if necessary. The normalized maps containing the cortical thickness values of each subject were smoothed with a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) kernel of 10 mm for statistical analyses. The Degree of Cortical Folding. The degree of cortical folding has traditionally been estimated by computing a ratio between the gray matter surface contour and an outer contour in successive coronal sections (13,31). Schaer et al. (32) extended these ideas to obtain a local estimate of the degree of cortical folding. With the reconstructed gray matter surfaces, we measured the degree of cortical folding with the method by Schaer et al. (32). This method has been previously validated in a juvenile clinical population (32). The degree of cortical folding was only studied in regions where cortical thinning was detected, to provide maximum information about those regions. Statistical Analyses Demographic and Clinical Data. Data were checked for normality and outliers. If the results were not normal, the values were transformed with a logarithmic transformation. To test for group differences in the demographic and clinical data, the Student t test was used for the normally distributed continuous variables, and ␹2 was used for discrete categorical variables. Confounds; Age and Intracranial Volume. For analyses of cortical thickness, surface, volume, and folding, age was entered a priori as a covariate, because age seems to be related to these SBM variables (33,34). In analyses of surface and volume, we also controlled for intracranial volume (35). For cortical thickness and folding, the relationship with intracranial volume is not clear (35). The results for cortical thickness and folding did not change after including intracranial volume as a covariate; the results without controlling for intracranial volume are reported here. Analysis of Thickness, Surface, Folding, and Volume. Step One: Comparison of Cortical Thickness Maps. In step one, we did two analyses. In the first analysis cortical thickness (not divided in gyri and sulci) maps for each hemisphere were compared between patients and control subjects at every vertex over the whole cortex. For the second analysis the comparison between patients and control subjects was made in the frontal and temporal regions only (see Figure 2 for the included cortical frontal and temporal regions). These regions were a priori selected on the basis of previous literature showing significant structural deficits in adolescent patients with psychosis (8,15,36). www.sobp.org/journal

1050 BIOL PSYCHIATRY 2009;66:1047–1054

J. Janssen et al.

Results Demographic and Clinical Data There were no significant group differences in handedness, years of education, and parental socioeconomic status (Table 1). Age was slightly higher in the control group (.7 years, p ⫽ .06). Patients had significantly lower estimated IQ compared with healthy control subjects (38,39), as expected from previous studies.

Figure 2. For the left hemisphere, lateral and medial views of the studyspecific average gray matter surface template. Colors represent the automatically labeled frontal and temporal cortex regions. The combined frontal and temporal regions were used a priori as a region of interest in step one of the statistical analysis (see Statistical Analysis). Included frontal regions: superior frontal, rostral and caudal middle frontal, pars opercularis, pars triangularis, pars orbitalis, lateral and medial orbitofrontal, precentral, paracentral, and frontal pole. Included temporal regions: superior, middle, and inferior temporal, fusiform, transverse temporal, entorhinal, temporal pole, and parahippocampal. Cortical labeling is based on the Desikan template; for further information on the labels, see Desikan et al. (30). The cingulate cortex was excluded from all analyses, due to its high anatomical variability (59). The medial wall is colored black; it was also excluded from all analyses. Idem for the right hemisphere (not shown).

In the second analysis we then compared cortical thickness maps at every vertex over the combined frontal and temporal cortex only. A General Linear Model was used in both the first and second analysis. Step One: Correction for Multiple Comparisons. In both the whole cortex and the combined frontal and temporal cortex analysis, we corrected for multiple comparisons by using Monte Carlo permutation testing. Monte Carlo permutation cluster analyses were performed with a vertex-wise threshold of .05 and a cluster threshold of .05. The Monte Carlo simulations were used to investigate whether the vertex-wise threshold confirmed the cluster threshold criteria used in the analyses. This statistical approach and cluster threshold has been used previously in studies investigating psychosis (37). Step 2: Within-Cluster Analysis of Mean Thickness, Surface, the Degree of Folding, and Volume. In this step we compared, group-wise, the mean gyral and sulcal thickness (Figure 2), surface, degree of cortical folding, and volume over the clusters of vertices that differed significantly between the groups in step one. Thus for each significant cluster from step one of the analysis and for every subject, gyral and sulcal thickness, surface, degree of folding, and volume were averaged over all vertices. Group differences for these variables were assessed by using analysis of covariance; we report both the ␣ and the effect size (ES) (partial H2). Relationship of the Results with Treatment and Estimated IQ To investigate whether group differences were correlated with dose of CPE or estimated IQ, we performed partial correlations within the patient group between the thickness, surface, folding, and volume variables and the dose of CPE and estimated IQ, controlling for age and intracranial volume. www.sobp.org/journal

Analysis of Thickness, Surface, Folding, and Volume Left Hemisphere. Step One: Comparison of Cortical Thickness Maps. A comparison of the cortical thickness maps between patients and control subjects over the whole left hemispheric cortex yielded two clusters where patients showed thinner cortex compared with control subjects (Figure 3). One cluster was located in the inferior/middle frontal cortex (corrected clusterbased p ⫽ .01, surface area 1167 mm2), and the other cluster was located in the superior temporal region (corrected cluster-based p ⫽ .005, surface area 1290 mm2). Comparing the cortical thickness maps between patients and control subjects over the combined left frontal and temporal cortex only (see Figure 2 for the included frontal and temporal regions) did not lead to the identification of any new clusters. There were no clusters detected where patients had increased cortical thickness relative to control subjects. Step 2: Within-Cluster Analysis of Mean Thickness, Surface, the Degree of Folding, and Volume. In the superior temporal cluster, both mean gyral (ES ⫽ .2) and sulcal (ES ⫽ .3) thickness as well as volume (ES ⫽ .1) were decreased in patients (Table 2). In the inferior/middle frontal cluster, mean gyral (ES ⫽ .2) and sulcal (ES ⫽ .1) thickness of the cortex were decreased and surface area (ES ⫽ .05) were increased in patients, effectively canceling out a volume effect (Table 3). No cluster showed a significant group difference in the degree of cortical folding. Right Hemisphere. Step One: Comparison of Cortical Thickness Maps. When comparing the cortical thickness maps between the patients and control subjects over the whole right hemisphere, three clusters where patients had thinner cortex— compared with control subjects—survived correction for multiple comparisons (Figure 3). One was located in the superior frontal gyrus (corrected cluster-based p ⫽ .0002, surface area 2006 mm2), another was located in the medium orbitofrontal area (corrected cluster-based p ⫽ .01, surface area 1137 mm2), and the third was located in the occipital lobe (corrected cluster-based p ⫽ .002, surface area 1440 mm2). Comparing the cortical thickness maps over the combined right frontal and temporal cortex (Figure 2) led to the detection of two additional clusters: one located in the inferior/middle frontal cortex (corrected cluster-based p ⫽ .01, surface area 834 mm2), and the other in the superior temporal region (corrected cluster-based p ⫽ .02, surface area 799 mm2). The fact that these two clusters were detected only after comparison of groups over the combined frontal and temporal cortex indicates that these clusters were statistically less strongly different between the groups compared with the superior frontal, medium orbitofrontal, and occipital clusters detected in the group comparison over the whole right hemisphere. There were no clusters detected where patients had increased cortical thickness relative to control subjects. Step 2: Within-Cluster Analysis of Mean Thickness, Surface, the Degree of Folding, and Volume. For the superior frontal (ES gyral ⫽ .2, sulcal ⫽ .2, volume ⫽ .2), medium orbitofrontal (ES

BIOL PSYCHIATRY 2009;66:1047–1054 1051

J. Janssen et al.

Figure 3. Right hemisphere, lateral (A), frontal (B), and medial (C) views of the inflated study-specific average gray matter surface template overlayed with the thresholded curvature map. Red and blue colored clusters represent regions of decreased cortical thickness in 49 male adolescents with first episode early-onset psychosis compared with 34 male control subjects. Statistical analysis was performed by fitting a general linear model at every vertex, with age as a covariate, and correction for multiple comparisons was done with the Monte Carlo permutation method (see statistical analyses and Wisco et al. [37]). Red clusters were detected after the comparison of the groups over the whole cortex, and blue clusters were detected after the comparison of groups over the combined frontal and temporal cortex only (see Figure 2 for the included frontal and temporal regions). Blue clusters were statistically less strongly different between patients and control subjects compared with the red clusters. Labeled regions that contained parts of significant clusters are depicted as color-filled; the other labeled regions are depicted as color-outlined. Labels are those of the Desikan template, on the basis of gyral boundaries commonly employed in manual segmentations. On the basis of this template, the cortex was automatically labeled into 32 regions, which allowed for the accurate localization of the results. For further information on labels, see Desikan et al. (30). Lateral view (D) of the left hemisphere.

gyral ⫽ .2, sulcal ⫽ .1, volume ⫽ .1), occipital (ES gyral ⫽ .2, sulcal ⫽ .2, volume ⫽ .1), and superior temporal (ES gyral ⫽ .2, sulcal ⫽ .1, volume ⫽ .2) clusters, both mean gyral and sulcal thickness as well as volume were significantly decreased in patients (Table 2). For the inferior/middle frontal cluster, gyral thickness was significantly thinner in patients (ES .1), whereas sulcal thickness was not. In the superior frontal cluster, patients had a nearly significant lower degree of cortical folding with a small ES (p ⫽ .06, ES ⫽ .05, Table 3).

Relationship of the Results with Treatment and Estimated IQ No significant partial correlations between any of the SBM variables with dose of CPE or estimated IQ were found.

Discussion The main findings of this study were, firstly, that male adolescents with first-episode EOP showed decreased bilateral gyral and sulcal thickness and volume deficits in prefrontal and

Table 2. Gyral and Sulcal Cortical Thickness in Clusters of Decreased Cortical Thickness Thicknessa Gyrus b

% Vertices Cluster Left Hemisphere Superior temporal Inferior middle frontal Right Hemisphere Superior frontal Medium orbitofrontal Occipital Superior temporald Inferior middle frontald

Sulcus

Patients

CS

Patients

CS

Patients

CS

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

75 41

75 41

2.28 2.42

.21 .19

2.48c 2.66c

.23 .23

2.12 2.25

.12 .21

2.33c 2.44c

.18 .22

48 48 59 21 27

48 48 55 22 28

2.63 2.56 1.79 2.49 2.70

.25 .27 .16 .23 .26

2.86c 2.83c 1.95c 2.71c 2.81e

.23 .25 .21 .21 .28

2.42 2.41 1.70 2.29 2.39

.23 .25 .13 .31 .33

2.62c 2.67c 1.84c 2.51e 2.50

.22 .33 .15 .41 .40

CS, control subjects. Cortical thickness in millimeters. Percentage of total number of cluster vertices belonging to gyral part of cluster. c p ⬍ .001. d Clusters detected after combined frontal and temporal cortex analysis (see Figure 2 for included frontal and temporal regions). e p ⬍ .05. a

b

www.sobp.org/journal

1052 BIOL PSYCHIATRY 2009;66:1047–1054

J. Janssen et al.

Table 3. Cortical Surface, Volume, and the Degree of Cortical Folding in Clusters of Cortical Thinning Surfacea Patients Cluster Left Hemisphere Superior temporal Inferior middle frontal Right Hemisphere Superior frontal Medium orbitofrontal Occipital Superior temporalg Inferior middle frontalg

Mean

Volumeb CS

SD

923.4 825.4

146.7 180.8

1363.6 783.1 1,017.3 570.7 555.1

209.1 129.9 189.9 65.5 133.6

Mean

935.7 733.2e 1388.2 795.4 1,023.5 587.8 599.1

Patients

Foldingc CS

Patients

CS

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

100.9 167.9

1822.4 2170.9

325.3 493.2

1985.4d 2143.5

260.2 368.2

4.5 3.9

.3 .3

4.5 4.0

.2 .3

232.3 151.0 177.8 85.1 138.4

3,825.3 2,222.3 1705.4 1746.1 1859.6

580.2 395.1 358.1 287.4 473.8

4,269.5f 2,534.8d 1904.8d 2039.1f 2098.6e

617.7 565.1 389.7 345.2 401.7

2.4 2.1 2.5 4.4 3.8

.1 .1 .1 .3 .4

2.4 2.1 2.5 4.5 3.9

.1 .1 .1 .3 .4

a

Surface in mm2. Volume in mm3. c Folding is unitless. d p ⬍ .01. e p ⬍ .05. f p ⬍ .001. g Clusters detected after combined frontal and temporal cortex analysis (see Figure 2 for included frontal and temporal regions). b

superior temporal regions and in a right occipital region. There was one exception: a right inferior-middle frontal region where gyral thickness was affected, whereas sulcal thickness was not. Secondly, in a right superior frontal region, decreased cortical thickness overlapped with a decreased degree in cortical folding (which was not significant but was close to significance) in our sample of male EOP patients. The results of the current study are consistent with previous studies reporting cortical thinning and volume deficits in prefrontal, temporal, and occipital subregions, in adolescents with psychosis (8,16) and in children and adults with first episode and chronic schizophrenia (1–3,15,40,41). One recent study used the same methodology for measuring cortical thickness as the current study but reported more widespread thinning in patients (16). This might be due to important differences between the study by Voets et al. (16) and the current one. Patients in the study by Voets et al. had a considerably longer mean disease duration compared with the patients in the current study (1.4 years vs. 13 weeks) and constituted a mixed gender sample. In addition, the acquisition protocol used by Voets et al. was optimized for SBM, which could have improved the sensitivity of their SBM analysis. Our results suggest that in male subjects with EOP, decreased thickness in both gyral and sulcal regions—more than a decrease in surface area—might underlie the volumetric deficits in these regions. For a left middle frontal region we found decreased thickness and increased surface area that effectively canceled out a patient/control difference in volume. This illustrates the power of decomposing volume into thickness and surface area. Furthermore, in a right inferior-middle frontal region, gyral thickness was more affected in patients compared with sulcal thickness. This is a provisional finding that needs replication. Morphological surface-based abnormalities in sulci have been reported in adult and adolescent patients with schizophrenia (5), but it was unclear whether these abnormalities overlapped with cortical thinning (5,12). Our finding suggests that for some cortical regions in male adolescents with EOP, cortical thinning is not uniform but might depend upon the relative gyral and sulcal presence in that region. The bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal and superior temporal regions where patients had decreased thickness include neural www.sobp.org/journal

circuitry related to diverse cognitive functions. For the right hemisphere, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has been strongly associated with executive, attentional, and working memory function, and the orbitofrontal cortex is known to play an important role in affective decision making (42). For the left hemisphere, our findings indicate cortical thinning in languagerelated regions (43). In adolescents with psychosis, language function might be impaired (44,45). In addition, functional as well as structural MRI studies have found abnormalities in brain structures belonging to the language network in adult and adolescent patients with psychosis (46 – 48). In patients, the degree of cortical folding was not abnormal in any region studied, although there was a nearly significant difference of small ES in one prefrontal region of cortical thinning. A decreased degree of cortical folding has been reported in adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia (19) and adult patients with chronic schizophrenia (4,49). Interestingly, the literature on cortical folding in those with increased genetic risk of psychosis shows predominantly increased prefrontal folding when compared with normal control subjects (50 –52). These findings might suggest a change in folding around the time of symptom onset. However, this is speculative, because cortical folding seems to be developmentally invariant (53). Although the current study did not measure the degree of cortical folding outside regions of decreased thickness, our results suggest that—in a right hemispheric superior frontal region— decreased cortical thickness might co-occur with a decreased degree of cortical folding in male adolescent patients with EOP. Few previous studies have investigated the relationship between cortical thickness and the degree of cortical folding, none of them in adolescents or adults with psychosis (54 –56). None of these studies found a clear linear correlation between thickness and the degree of folding, suggesting that the relationship between them is not straightforward (54). However, we found an identical inverse correlation in patients and control subjects between right superior frontal cortical thickness and degree of cortical folding, predicted by biological theories and models of cortical folding (11,57). Neurodevelopment of the human cortical folds takes place between the fourth month of gestation and the fourth postnatal month (13). Thus, an abnormal degree of cortical folding might be a strong indication of

J. Janssen et al. abnormal pre- and perinatal neurodevelopment. The fact that the degree of folding was generally not abnormal in regions of cortical thinning suggests that the patient-control differences in cortical thickness do not date from the period when gyri and sulci are forming. Thinning of the cortex in patients seems to stem from the later period after birth when, in healthy subjects, cortical thickness first increases and then decreases (34). The cortex might thus develop in a similar way in patients and control subjects during the early (pre- and postnatal) period, with the net tissue loss in patients resulting from events that happen during a later period. There are several caveats based on limitations of this study. Firstly, we did not have access to full-scale premorbid and current IQ for the patients. Patients underwent extensive neuropsychological testing. To reduce the time of assessment, we estimated IQ on the basis of two Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale subtests. Secondly, brain changes due to antipsychotic treatment cannot be ruled out (58). However, a strength of the current study is the short mean duration of exposure to antipsychotics. Given the magnitude of the anatomical ES we found and the relative short period of drug exposure, it is biologically unlikely that all of these differences are secondary to this confounding variable. Furthermore, we found no correlation within patients between anatomical variation in the relevant brain areas where significant group differences were found and dose of chlorpromazine equivalents used. Thirdly, our acquisition protocol was not optimized for SBM analyses (e.g., our scans did not have isotropic 1-mm voxel-resolution), which might have decreased the sensitivity of SBM. Fourthly, we analyzed cortical folding only in regions where differences in thickness were detected, which does not exclude the possibility of differences in folding in other areas of the cortex.

This study is supported by CIBER de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, and the Juan de la Cierva Programme of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation; CIBER CB06/01/0079; CDTEAM Programa CÉNIT of the Spanish Ministry of Industry; the Fundación Alicia Koplowitz; and Caja Navarra. EB was supported by a Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Foundation Chair in Biomedicine. Part of the computations of this work was done at the “High Capacity Cluster for Physical Techniques” of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), funded in part by the European Union (Fondo Europeo de Desarollo Regional program) and UCM. We would like to thank all the participants and their families. None of the authors have biomedical financial interests or other potential conflicts of interest relevant to the subject matter of this article. Supplementary material cited in this article is available online. 1. Glahn DC, Laird AR, Ellison-Wright I, Thelen SM, Robinson JL, Lancaster JL, et al. (2008): Meta-analysis of gray matter anomalies in schizophrenia: Application of anatomic likelihood estimation and network analysis. Biol Psychiatry 64:774 –781. 2. Kuperberg GR, Broome MR, McGuire PK, David AS, Eddy M, Ozawa F, et al. (2003): Regionally localized thinning of the cerebral cortex in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60:878 – 888. 3. Narr KL, Bilder RM, Toga AW, Woods RP, Rex DE, Szeszko PR, et al. (2005): Mapping cortical thickness and gray matter concentration in first episode schizophrenia. Cereb Cortex 15:708 –719. 4. Sallet PC, Elkis H, Alves TM, Oliveira JR, Sassi E, Campi de Castro C, et al. (2003): Reduced cortical folding in schizophrenia: An MRI morphometric study. Am J Psychiatry 160:1606 –1613.

BIOL PSYCHIATRY 2009;66:1047–1054 1053 5. Csernansky JG, Gillespie SK, Dierker DL, Anticevic A, Wang L, Barch DM, et al. (2008): Symmetric abnormalities in sulcal patterning in schizophrenia. Neuroimage 43:440 – 446. 6. Arango C, Kahn R (2008): Progressive brain changes in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 34:310 –311. 7. Burke L, Androutsos C, Jogia J, Byrne P, Frangou S (2008): The Maudsley Early onset schizophrenia study: The effect of age of onset and illness duration on fronto-parietal gray matter. Eur Psychiatry 23:233–236. 8. Douaud G, Smith S, Jenkinson M, Behrens T, Johansen-Berg H, Vickers J, et al. (2007): Anatomically related grey and white matter abnormalities in adolescent-onset schizophrenia. Brain 130:2375–2386. 9. James AC, James S, Smith DM, Javaloyes A (2004): Cerebellar, prefrontal cortex, and thalamic volumes over two time points in adolescent-onset schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 161:1023–1029. 10. James AC, Javaloyes A, James S, Smith DM (2002): Evidence for nonprogressive changes in adolescent-onset schizophrenia: Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging study. Br J Psychiatry 180:339 –344. 11. Welker W (1990): Why does cerebral cortex fissure and fold? In: Peters A, Jones EG, editors. A Review of Determinants of Gyri and Sulci, vol. 8b. New York: Plenum Press. 12. White T, Andreasen NC, Nopoulos P, Magnotta V (2003): Gyrification abnormalities in childhood- and adolescent-onset schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 54:418 – 426. 13. Armstrong E, Schleicher A, Omran H, Curtis M, Zilles K (1995): The ontogeny of human gyrification. Cereb Cortex 5:56 – 63. 14. Gogtay N, Sporn A, Clasen LS, Nugent TF, III, Greenstein D, Nicolson R, et al. (2004): Comparison of progressive cortical gray matter loss in childhood-onset schizophrenia with that in childhood-onset atypical psychoses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61:17–22. 15. Vidal CN, Rapoport JL, Hayashi KM, Geaga JA, Sui Y, McLemore LE, et al. (2006): Dynamically spreading frontal and cingulate deficits mapped in adolescents with schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:25–34. 16. Voets NL, Hough MG, Douaud G, Matthews PM, James A, Winmill L, et al. (2008): Evidence for abnormalities of cortical development in adolescent-onset schizophrenia. Neuroimage 43:665– 675. 17. Cachia A, Paillere-Martinot ML, Galinowski A, Januel D, de Beaurepaire R, Bellivier F, et al. (2008): Cortical folding abnormalities in schizophrenia patients with resistant auditory hallucinations. Neuroimage 39:927–935. 18. Harris JM, Yates S, Miller P, Best JJ, Johnstone EC, Lawrie SM (2004): Gyrification in first-episode schizophrenia: A morphometric study. Biol Psychiatry 55:141–147. 19. Penttila J, Paillere-Martinot ML, Martinot JL, Mangin JF, Burke L, Corrigall R, et al. (2008): Global and temporal cortical folding in patients with early-onset schizophrenia [published online ahead of print August 22]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 20. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, et al. (1997): Schedule for Affective disorders and schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:980 –988. 21. Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA (1987): The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 13:261–276. 22. Bartko JJ, Carpenter WT Jr (1976): On the methods and theory of reliability. J Nerv Ment Dis 163:307–317. 23. Hollingshead A, Redlich F (1958): Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community Study. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 24. Rey MJ, Schulz P, Costa C, Dick P, Tissot R (1989): Guidelines for the dosage of neuroleptics. I: Chlorpromazine equivalents of orally administered neuroleptics. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 4:95–104. 25. Woods SW (2003): Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry 64:663– 667. 26. Fischl B, Dale AM (2000): Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 11050 –11055. 27. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI (1999): Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9:179 –194. 28. Buckner RL, Head D, Parker J, Fotenos AF, Marcus D, Morris JC, et al. (2004): A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: Reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume. Neuroimage 23:724 –738. 29. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM (1999): Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9:195–207.

www.sobp.org/journal

1054 BIOL PSYCHIATRY 2009;66:1047–1054 30. Desikan RS, Segonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. (2006): An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31: 968 –980. 31. Zilles K, Armstrong E, Schleicher A, Kretschmann HJ (1988): The human pattern of gyrification in the cerebral cortex. Anat Embryol 179:173–179. 32. Schaer M, Cuadra MB, Tamarit L, Lazeyras F, Eliez S, Thiran JP (2008): A surface-based approach to quantify local cortical gyrification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27:161–170. 33. Kochunov P, Mangin JF, Coyle T, Lancaster J, Thompson P, Riviere D, et al. (2005): Age-related morphology trends of cortical sulci. Hum Brain Mapp 26:210 –220. 34. Shaw P, Kabani NJ, Lerch JP, Eckstrand K, Lenroot R, Gogtay N, et al. (2008): Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 28:3586 –3594. 35. Rakic P (1988): Specification of cerebral cortical areas. Science 241:170 – 176. 36. Janssen J, Reig S, Parellada M, Moreno D, Graell M, Fraguas D, et al. (2008): Regional gray matter volume deficits in adolescents with firstepisode psychosis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 47:1311–1320. 37. Wisco JJ, Kuperberg G, Manoach D, Quinn BT, Busa E, Fischl B, et al. (2007): Abnormal cortical folding patterns within Broca’s area in schizophrenia: Evidence from structural MRI. Schizophr Res 94:317–327. 38. Goldberg TE, Karson CN, Leleszi JP, Weinberger DR (1988): Intellectual impairment in adolescent psychosis. A controlled psychometric study. Schizophr Res 1:261–266. 39. Kenny JT, Friedman L, Findling RL, Swales TP, Strauss ME, Jesberger JA, et al. (1997): Cognitive impairment in adolescents with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 154:1613–1615. 40. Honea R, Crow TJ, Passingham D, Mackay CE (2005): Regional deficits in brain volume in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies. Am J Psychiatry 162:2233–2245. 41. Thompson PM, Vidal C, Giedd JN, Gochman P, Blumenthal J, Nicolson R, et al. (2001): Mapping adolescent brain change reveals dynamic wave of accelerated gray matter loss in very early-onset schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:11650 –11655. 42. Chudasama Y, Robbins TW (2006): Functions of frontostriatal systems in cognition: Comparative neuropsychopharmacological studies in rats, monkeys and humans. Biol Psychol 73:19 –38. 43. Marslen-Wilson WD, Tyler LK (2007): Morphology, language and the brain: The decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362:823– 836. 44. DeLisi LE (2001): Speech disorder in schizophrenia: Review of the literature and exploration of its relation to the uniquely human capacity for language. Schizophr Bull 27:481– 496. 45. White T, Ho BC, Ward J, O’Leary D, Andreasen NC (2006): Neuropsychological performance in first-episode adolescents with schizophrenia: A

www.sobp.org/journal

J. Janssen et al.

46.

47.

48.

49.

50.

51.

52.

53. 54.

55.

56.

57. 58.

59.

comparison with first-episode adults and adolescent control subjects. Biol Psychiatry 60:463– 471. Allen P, Laroi F, McGuire PK, Aleman A (2008): The hallucinating brain: A review of structural and functional neuroimaging studies of hallucinations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:175–191. Hubl D, Koenig T, Strik W, Federspiel A, Kreis R, Boesch C, et al. (2004): Pathways that make voices: White matter changes in auditory hallucinations. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61:658 – 668. Shergill SS, Kanaan RA, Chitnis XA, O’Daly O, Jones DK, Frangou S, et al. (2007): A diffusion tensor imaging study of fasciculi in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 164:467– 473. Wheeler DG, Harper CG (2007): Localised reductions in gyrification in the posterior cingulate: Schizophrenia and controls. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 31:319 –327. Harris JM, Moorhead TW, Miller P, McIntosh AM, Bonnici HM, Owens DG, et al. (2007): Increased prefrontal gyrification in a large high-risk cohort characterizes those who develop schizophrenia and reflects abnormal prefrontal development. Biol Psychiatry 62:722–729. Harris JM, Whalley H, Yates S, Miller P, Johnstone EC, Lawrie SM (2004): Abnormal cortical folding in high-risk individuals: A predictor of the development of schizophrenia? Biol Psychiatry 56:182–189. Vogeley K, Tepest R, Pfeiffer U, Schneider-Axmann T, Maier W, Honer WG, et al. (2001): Right frontal hypergyria differentiation in affected and unaffected siblings from families multiply affected with schizophrenia: A morphometric MRI study. Am J Psychiatry 158:494 – 496. Van Essen DC (1997): A tension-based theory of morphogenesis and compact wiring in the central nervous system. Nature 385:313–318. Bearden CE, van Erp TG, Dutton RA, Lee AD, Simon TJ, Cannon TD, et al. (2009): Alterations in midline cortical thickness and gyrification patterns mapped in children with 22q11.2 deletions. Cereb Cortex 19:115–126. Lin JJ, Salamon N, Lee AD, Dutton RA, Geaga JA, Hayashi KM, et al. (2007): Reduced neocortical thickness and complexity mapped in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Cereb Cortex 17:2007– 2018. Thompson PM, Lee AD, Dutton RA, Geaga JA, Hayashi KM, Eckert MA, et al. (2005): Abnormal cortical complexity and thickness profiles mapped in Williams syndrome. J Neurosci 25:4146 – 4158. Toro R, Burnod Y (2005): A morphogenetic model for the development of cortical convolutions. Cereb Cortex 15:1900 –1913. Lieberman JA, Tollefson GD, Charles C, Zipursky R, Sharma T, Kahn RS, et al. (2005): Antipsychotic drug effects on brain morphology in firstepisode psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 62:361–370. Fornito A, Yucel M, Wood SJ, Adamson C, Velakoulis D, Saling MM, et al. (2008): Surface-based morphometry of the anterior cingulate cortex in first episode schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp 29:478 – 489.